@event4u/agent-config 1.16.0 → 1.18.0

package/scripts/ai_council/one_off_archive/2026-05/_one_off_context_layer_v1_review.py

@@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
+"""Council review of road-to-context-layer-maturity.md draft v1 + PR #36.
+
+Both reviewers ran independent preview-reviews on PR #36 and converged on
+the same gap: rule layer is mature, context layer is unproven. The host
+agent distilled the convergence into road-to-context-layer-maturity.md
+(draft v1, 6 phases, lightweight tier).
+
+Council task: validate v1 against (a) the two preview-reviews summarised
+inline, (b) the actual PR #36 shape (description + diff stat), and (c)
+the existing always-budget contract. Together with the host agent,
+define the binding step list before lock.
+
+Single round, structured per-phase verdict. Saves the session under
+agents/council-sessions/.
+
+Invocation:
+    .venv/bin/python -m scripts.ai_council._one_off_context_layer_v1_review
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import subprocess
+import sys
+from pathlib import Path
+
+from scripts.ai_council.bundler import bundle_prompt
+from scripts.ai_council.clients import (
+    AnthropicClient,
+    OpenAIClient,
+    load_anthropic_key,
+    load_openai_key,
+)
+from scripts.ai_council.orchestrator import (
+    CostBudget,
+    CouncilQuestion,
+    consult,
+    estimate,
+)
+from scripts.ai_council.pricing import estimate_cost, load_prices
+from scripts.ai_council.project_context import detect_project_context
+from scripts.ai_council.session import SessionManifest, save as save_session
+
+REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]
+ROADMAP_PATH = REPO_ROOT / "agents/roadmaps/road-to-context-layer-maturity.md"
+
+ORIGINAL_ASK = (
+    "Two independent preview-reviews on PR #36 converged on the same "
+    "finding: rule layer is now mature; context layer is unproven. The "
+    "host agent distilled the convergence into a 6-phase lightweight "
+    "roadmap (road-to-context-layer-maturity.md draft v1). Council task: "
+    "validate v1 against the reviewers' findings, the PR's actual shape, "
+    "and the always-budget contract; together with the host agent, "
+    "define the binding step list."
+)
+
+REVIEW_PROMPT_HEADER = """\
+# Council Review — road-to-context-layer-maturity.md draft v1 + PR #36
+
+## Background (verbatim, do not re-frame)
+
+Two preview-reviews of PR #36 (`feat/better-basement` branch, 174 files,
++20k/-3.6k diff, structural-optimization roadmap closed + 1.16.0
+follow-ups Phase 1+2 closed) produced converging findings.
+
+### Reviewer #1 — 3-Layer Architecture lens
+
+- PR #36 is not a feature PR; it is the first **post-maturity
+  architecture move**.
+- Names a 3-Layer Architecture: **Rule** (Obligation / MUST), **Context**
+  (Decision Logic / HOW to think), **Examples** (Pattern Memory / HOW it
+  looks). Phase 2A revert proved the boundary matters — moving Iron-Law
+  prose into context made the rule unsafe.
+- Lauds: contexts/communication/ as a previously-unsolved area;
+  always-budget guard + golden tests as a maturity signal.
+- Gaps: (a) no Level-2 context-loading design (chain, priority,
+  budget, activation order); (b) no outcome measurement — golden tests
+  measure structure, not whether the agent decides better; (c)
+  context-activation clarity unclear (when, how many concurrently);
+  (d) Iron Laws must stay in Rule, never migrate to Context; (e)
+  Examples-as-demos under-leveraged.
+- Verdict: 9.6/10. Recommendation: do NOT add features/skills/rules;
+  perfect Context, make Examples real demos, make Decision-System
+  visible.
+
+### Reviewer #2 — Consolidation / scope-discipline lens
+
+- PR #36 is correctly framed as "Structural optimization foundation +
+  regression gates + command surface reduction", not a feature PR.
+- Lauds: Phase 2A abort + honest Model-(b) finding (Context Tax >
+  rule-slim gain); roadmap reflexion depth (council rounds, locked
+  decisions, file-ownership matrix); test gates; 1.16-followup clean
+  closure.
+- Gaps: (1) PR size 174 files reduces reviewability; (2) roadmaps
+  too heavy — auditable but not consumable for normal feature work,
+  needs complexity standard; (3) always-budget headroom 1,552 chars
+  (96.8% utilization) — slimming hebel exhausted, new strategy needed
+  (demote / merge / hard-compress / shared-context amortization);
+  (4) slow-rollout protocol compressed under autonomy mandate;
+  (5) one-off scripts accumulating in scripts/ai_council/.
+- P0 before merge: PR description rewrite, one-off-script decision,
+  honest budget block, Phase 2A as finding.
+- Verdict: 8.8/10 current, 9.1/10 with cleanup. "Inhaltlich stark.
+  Strategisch richtig. Aber zu groß und zu meta-lastig."
+
+### Convergence
+
+- Both: don't add more rules / skills / commands.
+- Both: context activation / loading / budget = the unsolved next
+  question.
+- Both: praise audit honesty, criticise size/concentration.
+- Both: PR #36 should ship after cleanup, not be expanded.
+
+## PR #36 shape
+
+- 174 files changed · +20,120 / −3,629
+- Branch: feat/better-basement → main (open)
+- Title: docs(roadmap): add structural-optimization v3.1 + 1.16.0 follow-ups v1.1
+
+(Full diff stat appended below; PR body appended below.)
+
+## Your task
+
+Review **road-to-context-layer-maturity.md draft v1** (full text appended
+below) against:
+
+1. **Reviewer convergence:** does v1 close every gap both reviewers
+   named, or does it merely paraphrase them?
+2. **PR #36 fit:** is Phase 0 (PR closeout) sufficient to ship #36
+   honestly, or are items missing that the diff exposes?
+3. **Always-budget contract:** is Phase 4 (Always-Budget v2)
+   structurally sound, or does it re-walk Phase 2A's path?
+4. **Lightweight-tier discipline:** does the roadmap itself follow
+   the standard it locks in Phase 5, or does it cheat its own gate?
+5. **Sequencing:** is `0 → 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5` the right order, or
+   should something move?
+
+## Output contract (STRICT)
+
+For EACH of the six phases, produce:
+
+```
+### Phase N — <title>
+
+**Verdict:** <ACCEPT | PARTIAL | REJECT>
+**What v1 gets right (1 sentence):** ...
+**What v1 misses or over-reaches (1-2 sentences):** ...
+**Concrete change to v2 (binding):** ...
+```
+
+Then a final block:
+
+```
+### Greenlight verdict
+
+<one of: FULL GREENLIGHT — lock v1 / CONDITIONAL GREENLIGHT — apply N
+revisions then lock / BLOCKED — major rework needed>
+
+**Binding revisions for v2 (numbered, ≤ 8):** ...
+**Estimated total effort:** <engineer-days>
+**One-line strategic risk you would still fly with:** ...
+```
+
+Total response budget: ≤ 1800 words. Do not re-write the roadmap. Do
+not propose a separate roadmap unless you mark BLOCKED.
+"""
+
+
+def _read(path: Path) -> str:
+    return path.read_text(encoding="utf-8") if path.exists() else ""
+
+
+def _diff_stat() -> str:
+    proc = subprocess.run(
+        ["git", "diff", "--stat", "origin/main..HEAD"],
+        cwd=REPO_ROOT, check=True, capture_output=True, text=True,
+    )
+    lines = proc.stdout.splitlines()
+    if len(lines) > 60:
+        return "\n".join(lines[:30] + ["... [middle truncated] ..."] + lines[-15:])
+    return proc.stdout
+
+
+def _pr_body() -> str:
+    try:
+        proc = subprocess.run(
+            ["gh", "pr", "view", "36", "--json", "body", "--jq", ".body"],
+            cwd=REPO_ROOT, check=True, capture_output=True, text=True,
+        )
+        return proc.stdout
+    except subprocess.CalledProcessError:
+        return "[gh pr view 36 unavailable]"
+
+
+def main() -> int:
+    anthropic = AnthropicClient(api_key=load_anthropic_key(), model="claude-sonnet-4-5")
+    openai = OpenAIClient(api_key=load_openai_key(), model="gpt-4o")
+    members = [anthropic, openai]
+
+    roadmap_text = _read(ROADMAP_PATH)
+    if not roadmap_text:
+        print(f"[error] roadmap not found: {ROADMAP_PATH}", file=sys.stderr)
+        return 1
+
+    bundle_text = "\n\n---\n\n".join([
+        REVIEW_PROMPT_HEADER,
+        "## PR #36 — diff --stat (origin/main..HEAD)\n\n```\n" + _diff_stat() + "\n```",
+        "## PR #36 — body (verbatim)\n\n" + _pr_body(),
+        "## Roadmap v1 (verbatim, the artefact to validate)\n\n" + roadmap_text,
+    ])
+    context = bundle_prompt(bundle_text)
+    project = detect_project_context(REPO_ROOT)
+    table = load_prices()
+
+    question = CouncilQuestion(
+        mode="prompt",
+        user_prompt=context.text,
+        max_tokens=4096,
+    )
+
+    estimates = estimate(
+        question, members, table, project=project, original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK,
+    )
+    print("=== ESTIMATE (single round, max tokens) ===")
+    total_est = 0.0
+    for c, e in zip(members, estimates):
+        print(f"  {c.name}/{c.model}: ~{e.input_tokens} in + {e.output_tokens} out = ${e.total_usd:.4f}")
+        total_est += e.total_usd
+    print(f"  TOTAL per round (max): ${total_est:.4f}")
+    print()
+
+    budget = CostBudget(
+        max_input_tokens=200_000,
+        max_output_tokens=80_000,
+        max_calls=20,
+        max_total_usd=2.50,
+    )
+
+    rounds_collected: list[list] = []
+
+    def _on_round_complete(round_idx: int, round_responses) -> None:
+        rounds_collected.append(list(round_responses))
+        print(f"=== ROUND {round_idx + 1} COMPLETE ===")
+        for r in round_responses:
+            if r.error:
+                print(f"  [error] {r.provider}/{r.model}: {r.error}")
+                continue
+            actual = estimate_cost(r.provider, r.model, r.input_tokens, r.output_tokens, table)
+            print(f"  [done] {r.provider}/{r.model}: {r.input_tokens} in / "
+                  f"{r.output_tokens} out · {r.latency_ms} ms · ${actual.total_usd:.4f}")
+        print()
+
+    print("=== CONSULT (1 round) ===")
+    consult(
+        members, question, budget,
+        rounds=1,
+        on_round_complete=_on_round_complete,
+        table=table, project=project, original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK,
+    )
+
+    if not rounds_collected:
+        print("[error] no rounds completed", file=sys.stderr)
+        return 1
+
+    actual_total = 0.0
+    for round_responses in rounds_collected:
+        for r in round_responses:
+            if r.error:
+                continue
+            actual = estimate_cost(r.provider, r.model, r.input_tokens, r.output_tokens, table)
+            actual_total += actual.total_usd
+    print(f"=== TOTAL ACTUAL: ${actual_total:.4f} ===")
+
+    final_round = rounds_collected[-1]
+    if not [r for r in final_round if not r.error]:
+        return 1
+
+    manifest = SessionManifest(
+        mode="prompt",
+        artefact=str(ROADMAP_PATH.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)),
+        original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK,
+        members=[f"{r.provider}/{r.model}" for r in final_round],
+        rounds=len(rounds_collected),
+        cost_usd_estimated=total_est,
+        cost_usd_actual=actual_total,
+        extra={"purpose": "Council review of road-to-context-layer-maturity v1 + PR #36"},
+    )
+    session_dir = save_session(manifest=manifest, responses=rounds_collected)
+    print(f"[saved] {session_dir.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)}/")
+    return 1 if any(r.error for round_r in rounds_collected for r in round_r) else 0
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    raise SystemExit(main())

package/scripts/ai_council/one_off_archive/2026-05/_one_off_followups_review.py

@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+"""Council review of road-to-1-16-followups.md (draft v1).
+
+The followups roadmap distils 14 numbered findings (F1-F14) from two
+external review rounds of release 1.16.0 into three phases:
+- Phase 0: reviewer P0/P1/P2 stack (README sync, budget headroom,
+  council labelling, release-tag gate). Effort <= 1 hour.
+- Phase 1: load_context: rollout to three medium-risk policy rules
+  + non-destructive-by-default failure-mode-only split + 1.15-followups
+  archive verification. Effort ~2 days.
+- Phase 2: README "Start here" anchor, host-agent wording precision,
+  golden-test failure-mode coverage. Effort ~0.5 days.
+
+Single round. Both members produce a structured per-phase verdict and
+together with the host agent define the binding step list before the
+roadmap is locked.
+
+Invocation:
+    .venv/bin/python -m scripts.ai_council._one_off_followups_review
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import sys
+from pathlib import Path
+
+from scripts.ai_council.bundler import bundle_roadmap
+from scripts.ai_council.clients import (
+    AnthropicClient,
+    OpenAIClient,
+    load_anthropic_key,
+    load_openai_key,
+)
+from scripts.ai_council.orchestrator import (
+    CostBudget,
+    CouncilQuestion,
+    consult,
+    estimate,
+)
+from scripts.ai_council.pricing import estimate_cost, load_prices
+from scripts.ai_council.project_context import detect_project_context
+from scripts.ai_council.session import SessionManifest, save as save_session
+
+REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]
+ROADMAP_PATH = REPO_ROOT / "agents/roadmaps/road-to-1-16-followups.md"
+
+ORIGINAL_ASK = (
+    "Two external review rounds on release 1.16.0 produced 14 numbered "
+    "findings (F1-F14) and a P0/P1/P2 fix stack. The host agent distilled "
+    "them into road-to-1-16-followups.md (draft v1, 3 phases, 7 risks). "
+    "Council task: evaluate the F1-F14 capture quality, the phase split, "
+    "the gating between this roadmap and road-to-structural-optimization "
+    "v3.1, and the per-step contracts. Together with the host agent, "
+    "define the binding step list before lock-in."
+)
+
+REVIEW_PROMPT = """\
+# Council Review — road-to-1-16-followups.md draft v1
+
+Context for both reviewers:
+
+- A separate roadmap (`road-to-structural-optimization.md`) was \
+  finalised at v3.1 in a prior session. You both reviewed it across \
+  five rounds. v3.1 is locked. **Do not re-litigate it.** This review \
+  is about a *different*, *narrower* roadmap that addresses post-1.16.0 \
+  PR feedback.
+- Reviewer 1 (consolidation-quality lens) scored 1.16.0 at 9.5/10. \
+  Concerns: surface still large, README dense, context-layer rollout \
+  pace, "agent runs / implements" overclaim risk, golden-test failure-\
+  mode bias. Strategy notes (F5-F8): roll out load_context: slowly, \
+  prepare a second command-collapse phase, ship outcome demos, do not \
+  inflate the README.
+- Reviewer 2 (commit-level audit, raw.githubusercontent.com verified) \
+  scored 1.16.0 at A-. Concrete findings:
+  - **F9 (P0):** README on `main` shows pre-1.15.0 wording \
+    ("Teach your AI agents Laravel...", "124 Skills · 46 Rules · \
+    73 Commands · 46 Guidelines"). The 1.16.0 release tag has the \
+    correct text but is not an ancestor of `main`. Reviewer-supplied \
+    cherry-pick SHAs: 1053d56, d26bf68, 2fa8022, c282ae3.
+  - **F10 (P1):** `tests/test_always_budget.py` top-5 cap headroom is \
+    ~141 chars after `no-cheap-questions` was added. Target: >= 2,000 \
+    chars headroom. Q3=A from structural-optimization v3.1 excludes \
+    safety-floor rules from slim work.
+  - **F11 (P2):** AI Council Phase 3-4 (debate, persistence, special \
+    modes) grew without external-user signal. Reviewer fix: experimental \
+    banner, no code cut.
+  - **F14:** 1.16.0 tag points to commit 08daac9 which is not on `main`. \
+    Workflow gap.
+- Three Reviewer-1 strategy items (F5/F6/F7) and one (F8) on golden \
+  tests are also captured. The host agent placed them as: F5/F6/F7 = \
+  out-of-scope strategy notes (next-roadmap-generation seed); F8 = \
+  Phase 2.3.
+
+You both reviewed v3.1 already. **Stop re-reviewing v3.1.** Pick a \
+binding verdict per phase of *this* followups roadmap, and together \
+with the host agent define the final step list.
+
+## Output Contract (STRICT)
+
+For each phase, produce exactly this block:
+
+```
+### Phase <0|1|2>: <theme>
+
+**Verdict:** <ACCEPT | ACCEPT_WITH_REVISIONS | REJECT>
+**Capture quality (F-items folded into this phase):** <COMPLETE | PARTIAL — list missing> 
+**Gate correctness:** <CORRECT | UNDER-GATED | OVER-GATED>
+**Per-step contract clarity:** <SUFFICIENT | NEEDS_TIGHTENING — name steps>
+**Required revisions (numbered, 1-3 max):**
+  1. <one sentence — smallest change>
+  2. <...>
+  3. <...>
+**Risk register coverage:** <SUFFICIENT | MISSING — name risk>
+```
+
+Verdict definitions:
+- **ACCEPT** — phase ships as written; no revisions required.
+- **ACCEPT_WITH_REVISIONS** — phase ships after the listed revisions \
+  land. Each revision must be one specific, actionable change.
+- **REJECT** — phase is structurally wrong; describe the structural \
+  fault in <= 2 sentences in the revisions block.
+
+## The Three Phases
+
+The roadmap text follows this prompt verbatim. Read it first, then \
+render the three blocks above for Phase 0, Phase 1, Phase 2.
+
+## Cross-cutting questions (answer after the three blocks)
+
+```
+### Cross-cutting
+
+**Is the F1-F14 placement correct?** \
+  <YES | NO — list misplaced F-numbers and where they should go>
+**Is the gating to road-to-structural-optimization v3.1 correct?** \
+  <YES | NO — Phase 1 currently gates on v3.1 Phase 0.4 worked example>
+**Is anything missing entirely from the F1-F14 capture that the \
+  source feedback raised?** \
+  <NO | YES — list missing observation + which phase/risk it belongs to>
+**Is anything over-scoped (should not be a roadmap item at all)?** \
+  <NO | YES — list and justify>
+**Reviewer-1 strategy items F5/F6/F7 placement (out-of-scope, \
+  next-roadmap-generation seed) — correct?** \
+  <YES | NO — propose alternative placement>
+```
+
+## Final Output
+
+After the three phase blocks and the cross-cutting block, add:
+
+```
+### Consensus verdict
+
+**Overall recommendation:** <one of: LOCK_AS_IS | LOCK_AFTER_REVISIONS \
+  | RESCOPE_REQUIRED>
+**Phase-0 launchable now?** <YES | NO — reasons>
+**Phase-1 unblocked once structural v3.1 Phase 0.4 lands?** \
+  <YES | NO — reasons>
+**Total residual revisions:** <count and sum of effort estimates>
+**Single biggest risk in this followups roadmap that the host agent \
+  has under-weighted:** <one sentence>
+```
+
+Be decisive. The host agent will integrate your two verdicts; \
+divergence triggers a tie-break round, but only if you actually \
+disagree on a *blocking* item. Total response budget: <= 1500 words \
+per reviewer.
+"""
+
+
+def main() -> int:
+    anthropic = AnthropicClient(api_key=load_anthropic_key(), model="claude-sonnet-4-5")
+    openai = OpenAIClient(api_key=load_openai_key(), model="gpt-4o")
+    members = [anthropic, openai]
+
+    context = bundle_roadmap(ROADMAP_PATH)
+    project = detect_project_context(REPO_ROOT)
+    table = load_prices()
+
+    user_prompt = REVIEW_PROMPT + "\n\n---\n\n" + context.text
+
+    question = CouncilQuestion(
+        mode="roadmap",
+        user_prompt=user_prompt,
+        max_tokens=4096,
+    )
+
+    estimates = estimate(
+        question, members, table, project=project, original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK,
+    )
+    print("=== ESTIMATE (single round, max tokens) ===")
+    total_est = 0.0
+    for c, e in zip(members, estimates):
+        print(f"  {c.name}/{c.model}: ~{e.input_tokens} in + {e.output_tokens} out = ${e.total_usd:.4f}")
+        total_est += e.total_usd
+    print(f"  TOTAL per round (max): ${total_est:.4f}")
+    print()
+
+    budget = CostBudget(
+        max_input_tokens=200_000,
+        max_output_tokens=80_000,
+        max_calls=20,
+        max_total_usd=2.50,
+    )
+
+    rounds_collected: list[list] = []
+
+    def _on_round_complete(round_idx: int, round_responses) -> None:
+        rounds_collected.append(list(round_responses))
+        print(f"=== ROUND {round_idx + 1} COMPLETE ===")
+        for r in round_responses:
+            if r.error:
+                print(f"  [error] {r.provider}/{r.model}: {r.error}")
+                continue
+            actual = estimate_cost(r.provider, r.model, r.input_tokens, r.output_tokens, table)
+            print(f"  [done] {r.provider}/{r.model}: {r.input_tokens} in / "
+                  f"{r.output_tokens} out · {r.latency_ms} ms · ${actual.total_usd:.4f}")
+        print()
+
+    print("=== CONSULT (1 round, followups roadmap review) ===")
+    consult(
+        members, question, budget,
+        rounds=1,
+        on_round_complete=_on_round_complete,
+        table=table, project=project, original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK,
+    )
+
+    if not rounds_collected:
+        print("[error] no rounds completed", file=sys.stderr)
+        return 1
+
+    actual_total = 0.0
+    for round_responses in rounds_collected:
+        for r in round_responses:
+            if r.error:
+                continue
+            actual = estimate_cost(r.provider, r.model, r.input_tokens, r.output_tokens, table)
+            actual_total += actual.total_usd
+    print(f"=== TOTAL ACTUAL: ${actual_total:.4f} ===")
+
+    final_round = rounds_collected[-1]
+    if not [r for r in final_round if not r.error]:
+        return 1
+
+    manifest = SessionManifest(
+        mode="roadmap",
+        artefact=str(ROADMAP_PATH.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)),
+        original_ask=ORIGINAL_ASK,
+        members=[f"{r.provider}/{r.model}" for r in final_round],
+        rounds=len(rounds_collected),
+        cost_usd_estimated=total_est,
+        cost_usd_actual=actual_total,
+        extra={"purpose": "Council review of road-to-1-16-followups.md draft v1"},
+    )
+    session_dir = save_session(manifest=manifest, responses=rounds_collected)
+    print(f"[saved] {session_dir.relative_to(REPO_ROOT)}/")
+    return 1 if any(r.error for round_r in rounds_collected for r in round_r) else 0
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    raise SystemExit(main())