@esoteric-logic/praxis-harness 3.4.0 → 3.5.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/base/skills/px-prompt/SKILL.md +5 -5
- package/bin/prompt-compile.js +1 -1
- package/lib/assemblers.js +26 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/prompts/work/maximus/projects/benefeds/space-instructions-perplexity.md +8 -0
- package/prompts/work/maximus/projects/benefeds/system-prompt.md +10 -0
- package/prompts/work/maximus/projects/dha-tricare/prompt-config.yaml +12 -6
- package/prompts/work/maximus/projects/dha-tricare/space-instructions-perplexity.md +13 -5
- package/prompts/work/maximus/projects/dha-tricare/system-prompt.md +10 -0
|
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Platform outputs use suffixed filenames so users can distinguish them at a glanc
|
|
|
42
42
|
| Platform | Output Filename | Budget |
|
|
43
43
|
|----------|----------------|--------|
|
|
44
44
|
| Claude Projects | `system-prompt.md` | 5,000 chars |
|
|
45
|
-
| Perplexity Spaces | `space-instructions-perplexity.md` | 4,
|
|
45
|
+
| Perplexity Spaces | `space-instructions-perplexity.md` | 4,500 chars |
|
|
46
46
|
|
|
47
47
|
Each project has exactly **2 output files** — one per platform, same filenames regardless of mode.
|
|
48
48
|
- `system-prompt.md` — standalone: hand-written, compiled: generated from profile blocks
|
|
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ Read the full `system-prompt.md` as source.
|
|
|
370
370
|
|
|
371
371
|
### 3a. Generate Perplexity Space instructions
|
|
372
372
|
|
|
373
|
-
**Target:** `space-instructions-perplexity.md` | **Budget:** under 4,
|
|
373
|
+
**Target:** `space-instructions-perplexity.md` | **Budget:** under 4,500 chars
|
|
374
374
|
|
|
375
375
|
**Include:** identity, domain expertise, research domains, source priority, answer format, key frameworks (by name only), reasoning approach, accuracy standards, anti-hallucination rules
|
|
376
376
|
**Exclude:** internal templates, scoring matrices, reference file content, deployment details, full tables
|
|
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ Think step-by-step: Understand the question → search sources → analyze findi
|
|
|
415
415
|
|
|
416
416
|
After generating, check:
|
|
417
417
|
- `system-prompt.md` under 5,000 chars
|
|
418
|
-
- `space-instructions-perplexity.md` under 4,
|
|
418
|
+
- `space-instructions-perplexity.md` under 4,500 chars
|
|
419
419
|
|
|
420
420
|
If over budget: flag and suggest sections to trim.
|
|
421
421
|
|
|
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ Check each file against these criteria:
|
|
|
509
509
|
|
|
510
510
|
**Budget checks:**
|
|
511
511
|
- `system-prompt.md` under 5,000 chars?
|
|
512
|
-
- `space-instructions-perplexity.md` under 4,
|
|
512
|
+
- `space-instructions-perplexity.md` under 4,500 chars?
|
|
513
513
|
|
|
514
514
|
**Currency checks (via Perplexity):**
|
|
515
515
|
- Are domain-specific terms, standards, and versions still current?
|
|
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ Show a structured report:
|
|
|
522
522
|
|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|
|
523
523
|
| Quality Controls section | PASS | Present in system-prompt.md |
|
|
524
524
|
| Anti-Hallucination | FAIL | Missing — will add |
|
|
525
|
-
| Budget: Perplexity | PASS | 2,392 / 4,
|
|
525
|
+
| Budget: Perplexity | PASS | 2,392 / 4,500 chars |
|
|
526
526
|
| File naming | FAIL | Uses old convention — will rename |
|
|
527
527
|
| Knowledge files | WARN | 0 reference files — consider adding |
|
|
528
528
|
```
|
package/bin/prompt-compile.js
CHANGED
package/lib/assemblers.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -148,6 +148,20 @@ function assembleClaudeProject(blocks, projectConfig, vars) {
|
|
|
148
148
|
for (const block of formatBlocks) lines.push(block.content, '');
|
|
149
149
|
}
|
|
150
150
|
|
|
151
|
+
// Deal context — auto-injected from deal config vars
|
|
152
|
+
if (projectConfig.deal && vars.agency) {
|
|
153
|
+
lines.push('## Deal Context');
|
|
154
|
+
lines.push(`**Customer**: ${vars.agency}`);
|
|
155
|
+
if (vars.program_name) lines.push(`**Program**: ${vars.program_name}`);
|
|
156
|
+
if (vars.incumbent) lines.push(`**Incumbent**: ${vars.incumbent}`);
|
|
157
|
+
if (vars.contract_value) lines.push(`**Value**: ${vars.contract_value}`);
|
|
158
|
+
if (vars.naics) lines.push(`**NAICS**: ${vars.naics}`);
|
|
159
|
+
if (vars.pop) lines.push(`**POP**: ${vars.pop}`);
|
|
160
|
+
if (projectConfig.deal_type) lines.push(`**Type**: ${projectConfig.deal_type}`);
|
|
161
|
+
if (projectConfig.capture_phase) lines.push(`**Phase**: ${projectConfig.capture_phase}`);
|
|
162
|
+
lines.push('');
|
|
163
|
+
}
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
151
165
|
// Additional context
|
|
152
166
|
const append = (projectConfig.overrides || {}).claude_project_append || {};
|
|
153
167
|
if (append.additional_context) {
|
|
@@ -222,6 +236,18 @@ function assemblePerplexitySpace(blocks, projectConfig, vars) {
|
|
|
222
236
|
lines.push('');
|
|
223
237
|
}
|
|
224
238
|
|
|
239
|
+
// Deal context — auto-injected from deal config vars
|
|
240
|
+
if (projectConfig.deal && vars.agency) {
|
|
241
|
+
lines.push('## Deal Context');
|
|
242
|
+
lines.push(`Customer: ${vars.agency}`);
|
|
243
|
+
if (vars.program_name) lines.push(`Program: ${vars.program_name}`);
|
|
244
|
+
if (vars.incumbent) lines.push(`Incumbent: ${vars.incumbent}`);
|
|
245
|
+
if (vars.contract_value) lines.push(`Value: ${vars.contract_value}`);
|
|
246
|
+
if (projectConfig.deal_type) lines.push(`Type: ${projectConfig.deal_type}`);
|
|
247
|
+
if (projectConfig.capture_phase) lines.push(`Phase: ${projectConfig.capture_phase}`);
|
|
248
|
+
lines.push('');
|
|
249
|
+
}
|
|
250
|
+
|
|
225
251
|
// Research Domains
|
|
226
252
|
const append = (projectConfig.overrides || {}).perplexity_space_append || {};
|
|
227
253
|
if (append.research_domains) {
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -12,6 +12,14 @@ SSEB simulation: score only what's on the page against Section M. Ratings: Outst
|
|
|
12
12
|
11-section assessment (Customer/Architecture/Process/Artifacts/Planning/Assumptions/Risks/Dependencies/Cyber/Cost/Competitive). PAMASI maturity: P→A→M→A→S→I. Gates: Shaping=P, Mid Capture=A-M, Pre-Proposal=S, Pre-Submission=I.
|
|
13
13
|
BLUF every paragraph. FBP every claim. Active voice, SHALL→WILL, 70/30 mission/company. Ban "robust/world-class/seamless/leverage/synergy." Hierarchy: Approach→Framework→Methodology→Process (never conflate).
|
|
14
14
|
|
|
15
|
+
## Deal Context
|
|
16
|
+
Customer: Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
|
|
17
|
+
Program: BENEFEDS
|
|
18
|
+
Incumbent: FedPoint Systems LLC (Long Term Care Partners / John Hancock)
|
|
19
|
+
Value: $500M ceiling
|
|
20
|
+
Type: recompete
|
|
21
|
+
Phase: Shaping
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
15
23
|
## Research Domains
|
|
16
24
|
- OPM BENEFEDS contract history and performance (SAM.gov, FPDS)
|
|
17
25
|
- FedPoint federal performance and ATO certifications
|
|
@@ -46,6 +46,16 @@ Match response length to question complexity. Lead with the answer. No preamble
|
|
|
46
46
|
|
|
47
47
|
11-section scorecard (R/Y/G) + PAMASI stage + phase verdict (On Track/Needs Work/Off Track). Gate verdicts: Pass/Conditional/No Pass/Stop & Reset.
|
|
48
48
|
|
|
49
|
+
## Deal Context
|
|
50
|
+
**Customer**: Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
|
|
51
|
+
**Program**: BENEFEDS
|
|
52
|
+
**Incumbent**: FedPoint Systems LLC (Long Term Care Partners / John Hancock)
|
|
53
|
+
**Value**: $500M ceiling
|
|
54
|
+
**NAICS**: 518210, 524292, 541512
|
|
55
|
+
**POP**: Jan 2023 – Dec 2026
|
|
56
|
+
**Type**: recompete
|
|
57
|
+
**Phase**: Shaping
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
49
59
|
## Knowledge Files
|
|
50
60
|
Upload these alongside this prompt:
|
|
51
61
|
- **references/maturity-questions.md** — maturity-questions
|
|
@@ -10,7 +10,13 @@ platforms:
|
|
|
10
10
|
- claude-project
|
|
11
11
|
- perplexity-space
|
|
12
12
|
|
|
13
|
-
vars:
|
|
13
|
+
vars:
|
|
14
|
+
agency: "Defense Health Agency (DHA)"
|
|
15
|
+
program_name: "TRICARE Managed Care Support / Health IT Services"
|
|
16
|
+
incumbent: "Humana Government Business (East), TriWest Healthcare Alliance (West), Leidos (MHS GENESIS)"
|
|
17
|
+
contract_value: "T-5: $70.9B (East) + $65.1B (West) + $6.9B (MHS GENESIS)"
|
|
18
|
+
naics: "524114"
|
|
19
|
+
pop: "T-5 active through ~2032. T-6 recompete expected ~2031."
|
|
14
20
|
|
|
15
21
|
knowledge_files:
|
|
16
22
|
- file: references/dha-tricare-intel.md
|
|
@@ -33,8 +39,8 @@ knowledge_packs:
|
|
|
33
39
|
overrides:
|
|
34
40
|
perplexity_space_append:
|
|
35
41
|
research_domains: |
|
|
36
|
-
- DHA TRICARE T-5/T-6 contract developments (SAM.gov,
|
|
37
|
-
- DHA strategic plan,
|
|
38
|
-
- TRICARE beneficiary experience
|
|
39
|
-
- MHS GENESIS modernization
|
|
40
|
-
- Maximus federal health IT
|
|
42
|
+
- DHA TRICARE T-5/T-6 contract developments (SAM.gov, FPDS)
|
|
43
|
+
- DHA strategic plan, GAO findings, congressional oversight
|
|
44
|
+
- TRICARE beneficiary experience and provider networks
|
|
45
|
+
- MHS GENESIS modernization
|
|
46
|
+
- Maximus federal health IT past performance
|
|
@@ -12,12 +12,20 @@ SSEB simulation: score only what's on the page against Section M. Ratings: Outst
|
|
|
12
12
|
11-section assessment (Customer/Architecture/Process/Artifacts/Planning/Assumptions/Risks/Dependencies/Cyber/Cost/Competitive). PAMASI maturity: P→A→M→A→S→I. Gates: Shaping=P, Mid Capture=A-M, Pre-Proposal=S, Pre-Submission=I.
|
|
13
13
|
BLUF every paragraph. FBP every claim. Active voice, SHALL→WILL, 70/30 mission/company. Ban "robust/world-class/seamless/leverage/synergy." Hierarchy: Approach→Framework→Methodology→Process (never conflate).
|
|
14
14
|
|
|
15
|
+
## Deal Context
|
|
16
|
+
Customer: Defense Health Agency (DHA)
|
|
17
|
+
Program: TRICARE Managed Care Support / Health IT Services
|
|
18
|
+
Incumbent: Humana Government Business (East), TriWest Healthcare Alliance (West), Leidos (MHS GENESIS)
|
|
19
|
+
Value: T-5: $70.9B (East) + $65.1B (West) + $6.9B (MHS GENESIS)
|
|
20
|
+
Type: new-start
|
|
21
|
+
Phase: Shaping
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
15
23
|
## Research Domains
|
|
16
|
-
- DHA TRICARE T-5/T-6 contract developments (SAM.gov,
|
|
17
|
-
- DHA strategic plan,
|
|
18
|
-
- TRICARE beneficiary experience
|
|
19
|
-
- MHS GENESIS modernization
|
|
20
|
-
- Maximus federal health IT
|
|
24
|
+
- DHA TRICARE T-5/T-6 contract developments (SAM.gov, FPDS)
|
|
25
|
+
- DHA strategic plan, GAO findings, congressional oversight
|
|
26
|
+
- TRICARE beneficiary experience and provider networks
|
|
27
|
+
- MHS GENESIS modernization
|
|
28
|
+
- Maximus federal health IT past performance
|
|
21
29
|
|
|
22
30
|
## How to Answer
|
|
23
31
|
No flattery or filler. Be skeptical, concise.
|
|
@@ -46,6 +46,16 @@ Match response length to question complexity. Lead with the answer. No preamble
|
|
|
46
46
|
|
|
47
47
|
11-section scorecard (R/Y/G) + PAMASI stage + phase verdict (On Track/Needs Work/Off Track). Gate verdicts: Pass/Conditional/No Pass/Stop & Reset.
|
|
48
48
|
|
|
49
|
+
## Deal Context
|
|
50
|
+
**Customer**: Defense Health Agency (DHA)
|
|
51
|
+
**Program**: TRICARE Managed Care Support / Health IT Services
|
|
52
|
+
**Incumbent**: Humana Government Business (East), TriWest Healthcare Alliance (West), Leidos (MHS GENESIS)
|
|
53
|
+
**Value**: T-5: $70.9B (East) + $65.1B (West) + $6.9B (MHS GENESIS)
|
|
54
|
+
**NAICS**: 524114
|
|
55
|
+
**POP**: T-5 active through ~2032. T-6 recompete expected ~2031.
|
|
56
|
+
**Type**: new-start
|
|
57
|
+
**Phase**: Shaping
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
49
59
|
## Knowledge Files
|
|
50
60
|
Upload these alongside this prompt:
|
|
51
61
|
- **references/maturity-questions.md** — maturity-questions
|