@ericrisco/rsc 3.0.14 → 3.0.15
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/manifest.json
CHANGED
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ Ask only what the docs cannot answer, in plain words (`technical_level` in
|
|
|
27
27
|
server in the office.
|
|
28
28
|
- **Read or write?** Reports and questions need reading. Entering invoices needs writing, and
|
|
29
29
|
writing is a separate, explicit decision (below).
|
|
30
|
-
- **Who administers it?** Themselves, an IT person, an accounting firm, the vendor's distributor.
|
|
31
|
-
That person often holds the keys, and step 5 writes the message for them.
|
|
32
30
|
|
|
33
31
|
## 1. Research: the docs decide, never memory
|
|
34
32
|
|
|
@@ -128,20 +126,12 @@ Most small-business software was never meant to be connected. The safe pattern:
|
|
|
128
126
|
|
|
129
127
|
4. **Reach it privately.** Same network, or a private mesh (the `TAILSCALE` tool). Never open the
|
|
130
128
|
database port to the internet.
|
|
131
|
-
5. **
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
129
|
+
5. **Check the support terms.** Many vendors restrict direct database access. If they do, use
|
|
130
|
+
their export or their API instead.
|
|
133
131
|
|
|
134
132
|
## 5. Guide the user, in their words
|
|
135
133
|
|
|
136
|
-
Say what you found, which route you chose and why, and what happens next, in short sentences.
|
|
137
|
-
the next step belongs to someone else, write the message for them, ready to send:
|
|
138
|
-
|
|
139
|
-
```text
|
|
140
|
-
Hi <name>, we want our assistant to READ <data> from <program> for <purpose>.
|
|
141
|
-
Could you create a read-only user (SELECT only, no write permissions) on <database or a copy of
|
|
142
|
-
it>, and tell us the server name and port? We will not modify anything. If your support terms
|
|
143
|
-
prefer another method (an export, an official API), we are happy to use that instead.
|
|
144
|
-
```
|
|
134
|
+
Say what you found, which route you chose and why, and what happens next, in short sentences.
|
|
145
135
|
|
|
146
136
|
## 6. Leave it written down
|
|
147
137
|
|
|
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ should_trigger:
|
|
|
17
17
|
- prompt: "Hook up our WhatsApp Business number so the agent can see incoming orders."
|
|
18
18
|
why: "A named tool where the route is not obvious (the Business app versus the Cloud API). Research decides, and reading orders is the first, read-only step."
|
|
19
19
|
|
|
20
|
-
- prompt: "Mi TPV no tiene API. ¿
|
|
21
|
-
why: "Non-obvious trigger: no
|
|
20
|
+
- prompt: "Mi TPV no tiene API. ¿Cómo hago que el agente vea las ventas?"
|
|
21
|
+
why: "Non-obvious trigger: no API is not the end. The route comes from the product's export features or a read-only copy of its database, found in the vendor's docs."
|
|
22
22
|
|
|
23
23
|
- prompt: "Connect the agent to our Access database, the one the old stock program uses."
|
|
24
24
|
why: "A legacy file database. Copy the .mdb/.accdb, read it with mdbtools or convert it, and never write into the program's file."
|
|
@@ -55,4 +55,4 @@ capability:
|
|
|
55
55
|
- "Chooses a read-only route and never proposes writing into the program's database; if writing comes up, it goes through the official import format"
|
|
56
56
|
- "Proposes reading a nightly copy with a SELECT-only user, reached privately, never the live database exposed to the internet"
|
|
57
57
|
- "Builds 01-TOOLS/<TOOL>/ from the template with a test_connection that proves reading works AND that a write is refused, telling a permission error apart from any other failure"
|
|
58
|
-
- "
|
|
58
|
+
- "Explains the chosen route in plain words and records the connection in 02-DOCS"
|