@erclx/aitk 3.55.0 → 3.56.0

package/claude/.claude-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "aitk",
   "description": "Automated governance, versioning, and discovery tools for Claude Code.",
-  "version": "3.55.0",
+  "version": "3.56.0",
   "author": {
     "name": "Eric Le",
     "url": "https://github.com/erclx"

package/claude/skills/claude-orchestrate/SKILL.md

@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ Write no shape for a correction. A correction is a sentence, and a format for ad
 4. Hand off. Read `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/orchestrator-dispatch.md` and follow it: check the branch is unclaimed, check the row's file set against every track in flight, then dispatch a background worker with `claude --bg`. Fall back to the human-launch line it replaces when the check refuses, the sets overlap, or a stated reason serializes the row behind something already out.
 5. Review the PR. When a worker opens a PR, run `claude-pr-review` to post findings to it. This is the deep, independent pass. The worker's autoship self-review was only the green gate.
    - Learning that a PR moved is the mechanical half, so read `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/orchestrator-poll.md` and start the poll it carries on the first dispatch rather than checking the board by hand. That runbook holds the routing, and a summary of it here is a second source that drifts from it.
-6. Dispatch the handback. A pass posting anything owed, a finding at any severity or a testing question, tells the session holding that branch to run `claude-address-review`, rather than waiting for a person to relay it. Re-review when the answer lands, then the human merges. Tell the trailing worker to rebase when its branch shares a seam with the merged one.
+6. Dispatch the handback. A pass posting anything owed, a finding at any severity or a testing question, tells the session holding that branch to run `claude-address-review`, rather than waiting for a person to relay it. Re-review when the worker's own message says the address pass finished, per the channel `claude-worker` states, rather than polling for an answer nothing else marks as landed. Then the human merges. Tell the trailing worker to rebase when its branch shares a seam with the merged one.
    - Read the threshold off `claude-pr-review`, which states it once and governs the heading with it, so an open heading and an owed dispatch answer the same question and either one is enough to send
    - Resolve the target at the moment of sending with `aitk sessions list --branch`, never from a mapping written down earlier, since names rotate as sessions end and one recorded earlier in a session has failed inside the hour. The runbook read at step 5 routes on the count and the confidence it answers with
    - Open the message with the worktree and branch the sender believes the reader holds, asking to be corrected, whenever that mapping is inferred rather than confirmed

package/claude/skills/claude-orchestrate/references/orchestrator-dispatch.md

@@ -81,6 +81,48 @@ The last bullet is the one under pressure, since the dispatch that first proved
 
 Report the dispatch as loudly as the human-launch line it replaces: name the branch, the model, the task, and the session name, so a person reading the transcript can follow what fired without watching it happen.
 
+## Dispatch to address a review
+
+`claude-address-review` is a single pass, not a chain, so a launch naming it
+alone reaches no `claude-worker` and takes no role, which owes no message
+either. `#1251`'s replacement session was launched that way, onto the branch a
+review had already posted findings against, and it answered by posting a
+thread reply and telling its controller nothing. Reach the role directly on
+this launch instead of wrapping a second chain around one skill that has none
+of its own.
+
+The branch already exists here, opened by whatever built it, so this shape
+skips the plan-derived name the build shape resolves above. Take `<branch>`
+off the pull request's own head ref. Enter the worktree the original build
+left on disk, `.claude/worktrees/<slug>/`, with `EnterWorktree`'s `path` form
+when it is still there, or `git worktree add .claude/worktrees/<slug>/
+<branch>` when it was cleaned up, so `<slug>` is that directory name either
+way.
+
+`EnterWorktree` refuses that path in the ordinary case, because the original
+build session stays registered against its own worktree after going idle and
+holds a harness-level lock the roster does not report. Work in the folder
+directly with `Bash`, `Read`, and `Edit` instead of retrying the tool, which
+is the route two workers already took today on two different branches.
+
+```bash
+claude --bg --model <model> -n "worker-<slug>" "Enter the worktree for <branch> at .claude/worktrees/<slug>/, creating it from that branch if the folder is gone. Run /aitk:claude-worker, then /aitk:claude-address-review. Your controller is the session whose sessionId is <dispatcher-id>. Resolve its current name from that id at the moment you send, and never resolve an addressee by name prefix. Message it when the address pass finishes, carrying what was addressed and the PR's CI state, and message it again if you stop on a question."
+```
+
+`<dispatcher-id>` and `<model>` resolve the same way the build shape resolves
+them above.
+
+Take this shape wherever a review needs answering and no live session already
+holds the branch. Where one does, message it to run `claude-address-review`
+instead, per the loop's own step 6, since a session already there needs no
+second one dispatched onto the same branch.
+
+That check is blind to a session working through the direct-path fallback
+above, since a session that never runs `EnterWorktree` never moves its
+registered branch off `main`, so `aitk sessions list --branch` reports nothing
+holding it. A dispatch landing on a branch worked that way collides with
+nothing the check can see.
+
 ## Fall back to the human
 
 Hand the row to the human-launch line in step 4 instead of dispatching when any of these hold, and name which one: the collision check refused, the row's file set overlaps a track already out, or a stated reason holds the row behind one.

package/claude/skills/claude-worker/SKILL.md

@@ -34,10 +34,11 @@ running and re-invoking it would restart the build.
 
 ## The channel
 
-The controlling session cannot watch this one build, so two messages are owed and
-nothing else.
+The controlling session cannot watch this one build, so three messages are owed
+and nothing else.
 
 - Announce the pull request as the ship chain's pull request step returns, carrying the number, the branch, and the task it closes. That transition is the one moment only this session knows, and the controller's review poll no longer starts on a dispatch because of it.
+- Announce when an address-review pass finishes, as `claude-address-review` Step 8 returns, carrying what was addressed and the PR's new CI state. That transition is the other moment only this session knows, and it is what tells the controller to re-review rather than leaving it to poll for an answer nothing marks as landed.
 - Send a block out as a message before it becomes an interactive prompt. A session already waiting on input never reaches the tool round that drains an inbound message, so a relayed answer arrives under the open question and changes nothing.
 - Send nothing on progress. A worker reporting progress rebuilds, on this side of the channel, the poll the announcement retired on the other.
 

package/docs/operating-model.md

@@ -94,13 +94,19 @@ reply that changes an outcome, such as a worker naming the plan question that
 already declined a finding, still belongs back on the PR, since the session
 holding it ends and the thread is what a later reader opens.
 
-Two messages travel the other way and the worker owes both. It announces its own
-pull request as the ship chain opens one, naming the number, the branch, and the
-task it closes. That is the one transition only that session can observe, since
-a worker that finishes goes idle rather than exiting, and one sat unnoticed for
-eighteen minutes before the announcement existed.
-
-The second reports a block before that block becomes an interactive prompt. A
+Three messages travel the other way and the worker owes all three. It announces
+its own pull request as the ship chain opens one, naming the number, the
+branch, and the task it closes. That is the one transition only that session
+can observe, since a worker that finishes goes idle rather than exiting, and
+one sat unnoticed for eighteen minutes before the announcement existed.
+
+It announces again when an address-review pass finishes, naming what it
+addressed and the pull request's new CI state. That transition is the other
+one only the worker can observe, and it replaces the same idle-poll gap on the
+review's return leg, after a worker once addressed a posted review by
+answering on the thread alone and telling its controller nothing.
+
+The third reports a block before that block becomes an interactive prompt. A
 queued message drains at the next tool round and a session already waiting on
 input never reaches one, so an answer relayed to an open prompt renders beneath
 the question and changes nothing. Nothing is sent on progress, which would

package/package.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "@erclx/aitk",
   "type": "module",
-  "version": "3.55.0",
+  "version": "3.56.0",
   "description": "Infrastructure and quality tooling for developer workflows",
   "license": "MIT",
   "bin": {