@equal-experts/kuat-react 0.2.2 → 0.2.4

package/docs/content/content-marketing-sales.md

@@ -0,0 +1,454 @@
+# Kuat Design System Marketing, Sales & Knowledge Content Guide
+
+---
+**Version:** 1.0  
+**Last Updated:** December 2024  
+**Type:** Specialized Guidelines  
+**Audience:** Marketing, Sales, PR, Business Development, Content Marketers  
+**Dependencies:** [`content-foundations.md`](./content-foundations.md) (read first)
+
+---
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+**⚠️ Important:** You must read [`content-foundations.md`](./content-foundations.md) before using this guide.
+
+This guide builds on the universal brand voice principles. It assumes you understand:
+- Core voice principles
+- Universal content principles
+- Audience considerations
+- Common anti-patterns
+- Quality tests
+
+---
+
+## Quick Reference: Marketing Content at a Glance
+
+**Marketing content should:**
+- Build awareness and reputation
+- Demonstrate expertise through evidence
+- Generate leads and opportunities
+- Educate external audiences
+- Position the Kuat Design System as a valuable solution
+
+**Tone range:** Confident to conversational (depends on content type)  
+**Key balance:** Expertise + Clarity = Credibility  
+**Primary audience:** Prospective users, existing users, practitioners, industry peers
+
+---
+
+## Content Type Decision Tree
+
+**What are you creating?**
+
+→ **Proving capability to prospects?** → Case Studies  
+→ **Sharing expertise/insights?** → Blogs  
+→ **Teaching methodology?** → Playbooks  
+→ **Persuading to choose us?** → Pitch Decks  
+→ **Engaging community?** → Social Media  
+→ **Sharing internally?** → Internal Communications  
+→ **Positioning thought leadership?** → Whitepapers/Research  
+→ **Website copy?** → Web Copy  
+→ **Email campaigns?** → Email Marketing
+
+---
+
+## Case Studies
+
+**Tone:** Straightforward and factual with focus on storytelling, results, and value
+
+**Purpose:** Demonstrate how the Kuat Design System helped teams achieve their goals
+
+**Target Audience:**
+- Prospective users evaluating design systems
+- Current users considering expanded usage
+- Internal teams learning from implementations
+
+### Key Characteristics
+
+✅ **Do:**
+- Tell a story: Challenge → How we solved it → Results
+- Highlight the design system's role and value
+- Make understandable by anyone (even without technical knowledge)
+- Include specific, measurable business results
+- Show how teams became more efficient
+
+❌ **Don't:**
+- Use buzzwords without evidence
+- Skip the measurable outcomes
+- Ignore team contributions
+- Write only for technical audiences
+
+### Required Structure
+
+1. **Context Setting** - What was the situation?
+2. **Challenge Identification** - What specific problems needed solving?
+3. **Our Approach** - How did the design system help?
+4. **Solution and Implementation** - What did we build/change?
+5. **Measurable Business Results** - What was the impact?
+
+### Example - GOOD
+
+```markdown
+# Accelerating Development with the Kuat Design System
+
+## The Challenge
+
+A fintech startup was struggling with inconsistent UI components across their React and Vue applications. Their design and development teams were spending 4-5 days per sprint aligning on implementation details for similar components, and design-to-code handoff was taking 2-3 days per feature.
+
+The lack of a centralized design system meant:
+- Inconsistent user experiences across products
+- Duplicate component development
+- Slow feature delivery
+- High maintenance costs
+
+## Our Approach
+
+We implemented the Kuat Design System, providing a unified component library for both React and Vue applications. The system uses shared CSS variables from `@equal-experts/kuat-core`, ensuring visual consistency while allowing framework-specific implementations.
+
+## The Solution
+
+Over three months, we:
+- Established the Kuat Design System with React and Vue packages
+- Migrated 12 existing components to the new system
+- Created comprehensive documentation for designers and developers
+- Integrated the system into existing workflows (Figma plugins, PR templates)
+- Trained the team on component usage and contribution
+
+The team actively participated in component design decisions and contributed new components, ensuring they deeply understood the system.
+
+## Results
+
+**Development Impact:**
+- Component development time reduced by 60%
+- Design-to-code handoff time reduced from 2-3 days to 2-3 hours
+- Consistent UI patterns across all applications
+- 40% reduction in UI-related bugs
+
+**Team Efficiency:**
+- Designers and developers aligned on patterns from day one
+- New team members onboarded 3x faster
+- Component reuse increased from 15% to 78%
+
+**Business Impact:**
+- Features shipped 2 weeks faster on average
+- Reduced design system maintenance overhead by 50%
+- Improved user experience consistency scores by 35%
+
+**Team Quote:**
+"The Kuat Design System didn't just give us components—it gave us a shared language. Our design and development teams now work together seamlessly, and we're shipping features faster than ever."
+— Lead Product Designer
+```
+
+### Tips for Writing Great Case Studies
+
+**Start with the business problem, not the technology:**
+- ❌ "The team's component library was outdated"
+- ✅ "Inconsistent components were causing 4-5 days of alignment work per sprint"
+
+**Use specific numbers:**
+- ❌ "We significantly improved their development speed"
+- ✅ "Component development time reduced by 60%"
+
+**Show real value:**
+- ❌ "We built a design system"
+- ✅ "The design system reduced design-to-code handoff from 2-3 days to 2-3 hours"
+
+---
+
+## Blogs (External & Internal)
+
+**Tone:** Purposeful and informative with author's personality shining through
+
+**Purpose:** Share insights, answer questions, demonstrate thought leadership
+
+**Target Audience:**
+- Practitioners seeking to learn
+- Potential users researching topics
+- Industry peers engaging with ideas
+- Internal teams sharing knowledge
+
+### Key Characteristics
+
+✅ **Do:**
+- Let author's style and voice come through
+- Answer specific questions audience may have
+- Make it insightful and understandable
+- Include concrete examples and evidence
+- Provide practical takeaways
+- Add compelling calls to action
+
+❌ **Don't:**
+- Write generic content that could be from anyone
+- Make unsupported claims
+- Use promotional language excessively
+- Skip the evidence and examples
+
+### Required Structure
+
+1. **Captivating Introduction** - Pique curiosity with a story, question, or surprising insight
+2. **Clear Problem/Question** - State what you're addressing
+3. **Evidence-Based Insights** - Share what you've learned with specific examples
+4. **Practical Takeaways** - Give readers something actionable
+5. **Compelling CTA** - Invite further engagement
+
+### Example - GOOD
+
+```markdown
+# Why Your Design System Might Be Failing (And How to Fix It)
+
+Three months into a design system project, a product manager pulled me aside. "We built this beautiful component library," she said, "but nobody's using it. What went wrong?"
+
+I've heard this story too many times. Organizations invest heavily in design systems, expecting them to accelerate development and ensure consistency. Instead, they get dusty documentation and frustrated designers building components from scratch.
+
+## The problem isn't the system itself
+
+In my experience across 15+ design system projects, failure rarely stems from technical implementation. The best-designed component library in the world won't succeed if teams don't adopt it.
+
+Here's what I've learned about why design systems fail—and more importantly, how to prevent it.
+
+## Start with actual problems, not aspirations
+
+**The Failure Pattern:**
+"We need a design system" becomes the goal, rather than solving real team problems.
+
+**What Works Instead:**
+A fintech client came to us wanting a comprehensive design system. Through interviews with their product teams, we discovered the real pain: designers and developers were spending 4-5 days per sprint aligning on implementation details for similar components.
+
+We started small: standardized their 3 most-used components with clear documentation and Figma-to-code handoff. Adoption was immediate because it solved a daily frustration. We expanded from there, letting actual usage guide priorities.
+
+**The lesson:** Design systems should solve problems teams already have, not problems you think they'll have.
+
+## Embed adoption into existing workflows
+
+**The Failure Pattern:**
+"Build it and they will come" - assuming documentation alone drives adoption.
+
+**What Works Instead:**
+At a UK retail company, we embedded design system adoption into their existing workflow:
+- PR templates included component library checklist
+- Design reviews specifically flagged inconsistent patterns
+- Slack bot suggested relevant components during discussions
+- Monthly "component clinic" pairing sessions
+
+Six months in, component reuse increased from 12% to 78%. Teams adopted the system because it made their existing work easier, not because we asked them to change their process.
+
+**The lesson:** Don't add design systems on top of existing workflow. Integrate them into how teams already work.
+
+## Measure impact continuously
+
+**The Failure Pattern:**
+Success measured by component count or documentation pages, not actual business value.
+
+**What Works Instead:**
+We helped a healthcare client track:
+- Time-to-implement common patterns (decreased 60%)
+- Design-dev alignment meetings (reduced from 12 hours to 3 hours per sprint)
+- Accessibility violations in production (dropped 85%)
+- Designer satisfaction with handoff process (improved from 4.2 to 8.7/10)
+
+These metrics showed real value to leadership and helped secure ongoing investment.
+
+**The lesson:** Measure the problems you're solving, not just the assets you're building.
+
+## Key Takeaways
+
+Design systems succeed when they:
+1. Solve real problems teams experience daily
+2. Integrate into existing workflows seamlessly
+3. Show measurable impact on team effectiveness
+4. Grow based on actual usage, not assumptions
+
+Start small, embed deeply, measure continuously. That's the path to a design system that actually gets used.
+
+---
+
+**Facing design system challenges?** I'd love to hear what's working (or not working) for your team. [Email me](mailto:...) or connect on [LinkedIn](link).
+
+Want to learn more about the Kuat Design System? [Get in touch with our team](link).
+```
+
+---
+
+## Social Media Content
+
+**Tone:** Conversational, friendly, informal
+
+**Purpose:** Engage audience, build community, share insights, drive traffic
+
+**Target Audience:**
+- Practitioners and potential users
+- Prospective users researching online
+- Industry peers and community
+- Existing users staying engaged
+
+### Platform-Specific Guidelines
+
+#### LinkedIn
+
+**Tone:** Professional but conversational and warm
+
+**Best Practices:**
+- Direct posts at audience using "you"
+- Ask questions to drive engagement
+- Use 3-5 relevant hashtags
+- Aim for 1,200-1,500 characters for longer posts
+- Include images or documents when possible
+- Post during business hours
+
+**Example - GOOD:**
+
+```
+Are you building a design system that supports multiple frameworks? 🤔
+
+We've seen this pattern across 15+ teams: you start with React, then need Vue support, and suddenly you're maintaining two separate component libraries.
+
+Here's what we're learning from teams getting it right:
+
+→ Share design tokens (colors, spacing, typography) across frameworks
+→ Use a monorepo structure to keep code close but separate
+→ Document patterns, not just components
+→ Build framework-specific implementations on shared foundations
+
+The teams that succeed treat the design system as a shared language, not a shared codebase.
+
+What challenges are you facing with multi-framework design systems? Let's discuss in the comments. 👇
+
+#DesignSystems #React #Vue #FrontendDevelopment #UIComponents
+```
+
+---
+
+## Internal Communications
+
+**Tone:** Friendly, approachable, authentic
+
+**Purpose:** Share knowledge, build community, facilitate discussion internally
+
+**Target Audience:**
+- Team members globally
+- Practice communities
+- Leadership and teams
+
+### Key Characteristics
+
+✅ **Do:**
+- Share quickly, don't over-polish
+- Reflect your authentic voice
+- Be concise and straightforward
+- Use humor and informal language
+- Focus on lessons learned
+- Be generous with knowledge
+
+❌ **Don't:**
+- Share sensitive information
+- Badmouth colleagues
+- Forget the whole team can see it
+- Make others look bad
+
+---
+
+## Writing Best Practices
+
+### General Guidelines
+
+✅ **DO:**
+- Write for all readers (skimmers and deep readers)
+- Focus on key message upfront
+- Use active voice predominantly
+- Be clear, concise, and specific
+- Write like a human, not a corporation
+- Adapt to your audience
+- Be consistent in tone and style
+- Use descriptive headers and structure
+- Lead with most interesting content
+- Use plain English where possible
+- Show examples, don't just tell principles
+
+❌ **DON'T:**
+- Use passive voice unnecessarily
+- Assume prior knowledge without context
+- Use jargon without explanation
+- Overuse "we" (can seem boastful)
+- Mix tones and styles inconsistently
+- Write vague or fluffy content
+- Be overly promotional
+- Make unsupported claims
+- Write generic content
+- Use buzzwords as a crutch
+
+### Active vs Passive Voice
+
+**Active Voice (GOOD):**
+- "The design system reduced development time by 40%"
+- "Teams adopted the components within 2 weeks"
+- "The component library improved consistency across applications"
+
+**Passive Voice (AVOID):**
+- "Development time was reduced by 40%"
+- "Components were adopted within 2 weeks"
+- "Consistency was improved across applications"
+
+### Accessibility and Inclusivity
+
+✅ **DO:**
+- Use gender-neutral language
+- Avoid idioms or explain them for global audience
+- Use disability-aware language
+- Be thoughtful with technical terms
+- Make content accessible to all readers
+
+❌ **DON'T:**
+- Use gendered pronouns as default
+- Reinforce stereotypes about roles or capabilities
+- Use disability as metaphor
+- Make assumptions about identity or background
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checklist for Marketing Content
+
+Before publishing, verify:
+
+**Purpose and Audience:**
+- [ ] Clear purpose and audience identified
+- [ ] Content serves specific business goal
+- [ ] Tone appropriate for content type and audience
+
+**Content Quality:**
+- [ ] Specific and detailed (not generic)
+- [ ] Evidence-based claims with examples
+- [ ] Active voice used predominantly
+- [ ] Plain English where possible
+- [ ] No unsupported claims or vague promises
+
+**Accessibility:**
+- [ ] Gender-neutral language used
+- [ ] No unnecessary jargon
+- [ ] Inclusive and accessible language
+
+**Mechanics:**
+- [ ] Proper attribution for quotes/sources
+- [ ] Style guide followed (numbers, dates, punctuation)
+- [ ] Proofread for spelling and grammar errors
+- [ ] Links work and are descriptive
+
+**Call to Action:**
+- [ ] Compelling CTA present (if appropriate)
+- [ ] Clear next steps for reader
+
+---
+
+## Additional Resources
+
+- **Content Foundations:** See [content-foundations.md](./content-foundations.md) for universal principles
+- **Product Content Guide:** See [content-product-ux.md](./content-product-ux.md) for product interface content
+- **Design System Overview:** See [../design/design-system.md](../design/design-system.md) for design token usage
+- **Component Guidelines:** See [../technical/component-guidelines.md](../technical/component-guidelines.md) for component patterns
+
+---
+
+**Remember:** Marketing content builds reputation and trust. Be generous with knowledge, specific with evidence, clear in tone, and valuable to your audience. When in doubt, ask: "Would this make someone want to use the Kuat Design System?"
+
+For universal principles and detailed quality tests, always reference [`content-foundations.md`](./content-foundations.md).
+