@elyx-code/project-logic-tree 0.0.6617 → 0.0.6619

package/dist/index.js

@@ -50165,7 +50165,7 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? T.setParent(a, null) : T.setParent(this.parent, null), c && T.subscribe(), T.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(T, k.Added);
+    a ? T.setParent(a, i) : T.setParent(this.parent, null), c && T.subscribe(), T.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(T, k.Added);
     const A = (_ = this.dataType) == null ? void 0 : _.clone(
       i,
       T,
@@ -52175,7 +52175,7 @@ Please consider than any updates might affect the overlap with the signature of
       v,
       y
     );
-    a ? A.setParent(a, null) : A.setParent(this.parent, null), c && A.subscribe(), A.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(A, k.Added);
+    a ? A.setParent(a, i) : A.setParent(this.parent, null), c && A.subscribe(), A.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(A, k.Added);
     const b = (x = this.inputs) == null ? void 0 : x.map(
       (j) => j.clone(
         i,
@@ -54387,7 +54387,7 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? b.setParent(a, null) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
+    a ? b.setParent(a, i) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
     const _ = (x = this.inputs) == null ? void 0 : x.map(
       (j, Z) => j.clone(
         i,
@@ -56118,7 +56118,7 @@ Specifically for return statements the parent needs to always be the 'function-d
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? b.setParent(a, null) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
+    a ? b.setParent(a, i) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
     const _ = (B = this.dataType) == null ? void 0 : B.clone(
       i,
       b,
@@ -57461,7 +57461,7 @@ You can attach new logic to the existing 'global-event' but creating a new calla
       v,
       y
     );
-    a ? _.setParent(a, null) : _.setParent(this.parent, null), c && _.subscribe(), _.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(_, k.Added);
+    a ? _.setParent(a, i) : _.setParent(this.parent, null), c && _.subscribe(), _.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(_, k.Added);
     const $ = (B = this.inputs) == null ? void 0 : B.map(
       (j, Z) => j.clone(
         i,
@@ -59201,7 +59201,7 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       v,
       y
     );
-    a ? _.setParent(a, null) : this.parent && _.setParent(this.parent, null), c && _.subscribe(), _.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(_, k.Added);
+    a ? _.setParent(a, i) : this.parent && _.setParent(this.parent, null), c && _.subscribe(), _.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(_, k.Added);
     const $ = (B = this.dataType) == null ? void 0 : B.clone(
       i,
       _,
@@ -60966,7 +60966,7 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? b.setParent(a, null) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
+    a ? b.setParent(a, i) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
     const _ = (x = this.inputs) == null ? void 0 : x.map(
       (j, Z) => j.clone(
         i,
@@ -64453,7 +64453,7 @@ If an entity is called by another, they must be in the same scope, which means t
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? b.setParent(a, null) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
+    a ? b.setParent(a, i) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
     const _ = (B = this.andChildrenGroup) == null ? void 0 : B.map(
       (q) => q.clone(i, b, V.UUID.uuid(), c)
     ), $ = (j = this.orChildrenGroup) == null ? void 0 : j.map(
@@ -79402,7 +79402,7 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? T.setParent(a, null) : T.setParent(this.parent, null), c && T.subscribe(), T.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(T, k.Added);
+    a ? T.setParent(a, i) : T.setParent(this.parent, null), c && T.subscribe(), T.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(T, k.Added);
     const A = (x = this.defaultValue) == null ? void 0 : x.clone(
       i,
       T,
@@ -81894,7 +81894,7 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? T.setParent(a, null) : T.setParent(this.parent, null), c && T.subscribe(), T.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(T, k.Added);
+    a ? T.setParent(a, i) : T.setParent(this.parent, null), c && T.subscribe(), T.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(T, k.Added);
     const A = (B = this.dataType) == null ? void 0 : B.clone(
       i,
       T,
@@ -105581,7 +105581,7 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? b.setParent(a, null) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
+    a ? b.setParent(a, i) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
     const _ = (B = this.inputsDeclarations) == null ? void 0 : B.map(
       (q, H) => q.clone(
         i,
@@ -106703,7 +106703,7 @@ const u4t = /* @__PURE__ */ Object.freeze(/* @__PURE__ */ Object.defineProperty(
       y,
       e
     );
-    a && b.setParent(a, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
+    a && b.setParent(a, i), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
     const _ = (x = this.functions) == null ? void 0 : x.map(
       (j, Z) => j.clone(
         i,
@@ -108837,7 +108837,7 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? b.setParent(a, null) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
+    a ? b.setParent(a, i) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
     const _ = (x = this.inputs) == null ? void 0 : x.map(
       (j, Z) => j.clone(
         i,
@@ -110561,7 +110561,7 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       y,
       e
     );
-    T.hydrateAncestors(), a && T.setParent(a, null), c && T.subscribe(), T.addSelfToProject(i), T.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(T, k.Added);
+    T.hydrateAncestors(), a && T.setParent(a, i), c && (T.subscribe(), T.addSelfToProject(i)), T.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(T, k.Added);
     const A = (b = this.defaultValue) == null ? void 0 : b.clone(
       i,
       T,
@@ -111832,7 +111832,7 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? T.setParent(a, null) : T.setParent(this.parent, null), c && T.subscribe(), T.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(T, k.Added);
+    a ? T.setParent(a, i) : T.setParent(this.parent, null), c && T.subscribe(), T.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(T, k.Added);
     const A = (b = this.dataType) == null ? void 0 : b.clone(
       i,
       T,
@@ -113125,7 +113125,7 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       y,
       e
     );
-    return T.initChildren(i), a && T.setParent(a, null), i == null || i.add(T, k.Added), c && T.subscribe(), i == null || i.attemptAutoclose(O.CloneEntity, this.id), T;
+    return T.hydrateAncestors(), a && T.setParent(a, i), c && (T.subscribe(), T.addSelfToProject(i)), T.initChildren(i), i == null || i.attemptAutoclose(O.CloneEntity, this.id), T;
   }
   // This function merges a given source entity with the current one
   // The goal is to keep the current instance with the current id
@@ -114568,7 +114568,7 @@ Specifically for break statements the parent needs to always be the 'loop' entit
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? b.setParent(a, null) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
+    a ? b.setParent(a, i) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
     const _ = (B = this.dataType) == null ? void 0 : B.clone(
       i,
       b,
@@ -116147,7 +116147,7 @@ Specifically for continue statements the parent needs to always be the 'loop' en
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? b.setParent(a, null) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
+    a ? b.setParent(a, i) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
     const _ = (B = this.dataType) == null ? void 0 : B.clone(
       i,
       b,
@@ -117299,7 +117299,7 @@ ${Wa(
       T,
       y
     );
-    a && A.setParent(a, null), i == null || i.add(A, k.Added), c && A.subscribe();
+    a && A.setParent(a, i), i == null || i.add(A, k.Added), c && A.subscribe();
     const b = (($ = this.dataType) == null ? void 0 : $.clone(
       i,
       A,
@@ -123114,7 +123114,7 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       y,
       e
     );
-    a ? b.setParent(a, null) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
+    a ? b.setParent(a, i) : b.setParent(this.parent, null), c && b.subscribe(), b.initChildren(i), i == null || i.add(b, k.Added);
     const _ = (x = this.inputs) == null ? void 0 : x.map(
       (j, Z) => j.clone(
         i,