@elyx-code/project-logic-tree 0.0.6566 → 0.0.6567

package/dist/index.js

@@ -48230,9 +48230,8 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -53919,9 +53918,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -63216,9 +63214,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -78891,9 +78888,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -81077,9 +81073,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -105850,9 +105845,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -108069,9 +108063,8 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -111366,9 +111359,8 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -122418,9 +122410,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -136669,7 +136660,7 @@ const mG = {
           z.error("Error: ", E), z.error("Errored entity: ", T);
         }
       }
-    }), l;
+    }), l.open = !1, l;
   }
   toBuiltInShallowRecord() {
     const i = {};