@elyx-code/project-logic-tree 0.0.6565 → 0.0.6567

package/dist/index.js

@@ -48230,9 +48230,8 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -53919,9 +53918,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -63216,9 +63214,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -78891,9 +78888,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -81077,9 +81073,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -105850,9 +105845,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -108069,9 +108063,8 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -111366,9 +111359,8 @@ This is likely an incorrect strategy, either the '${this.type}' entity doesn't n
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -122418,9 +122410,8 @@ You shouldn't have to manually update a 'parent' property. The equivalent result
       O.RemoveValueReader
     )
   )) {
-    return this.checkCanEditWithCounterpartAndSideEffects(
+    return this.checkCanEditFromScopeOwnerWithSideEffects(
       this,
-      i,
       O.RemoveValueReader,
       a
     ) ? this.writesValues.includes(i) ? (this.writesValues = this.writesValues.filter(
@@ -124093,7 +124084,7 @@ function jxt(d, u) {
         let K = M.defaultValue || null;
         if (!K) {
           const q = Mr.new(u);
-          q.parent = M.toReference(), q.id = V.UUID.uuid(), K = se(
+          q.name = ie.EntityTemplate, q.parent = M.toReference(), q.id = V.UUID.uuid(), K = se(
             q,
             d.project
           ), K.hydrateAncestors(), K.setParent(
@@ -128049,13 +128040,14 @@ function cUt(d) {
     ...d.listUpdated,
     ...d.listAffected
   ].forEach((a) => {
+    var e;
     const l = Oi(a);
     if (!l || i.has(l.id))
       return;
-    const c = d.project.get(a.id);
+    const c = d.project.get(a.id) || d.project.getDeleted(a.id);
     if (!c)
       throw new Error(
-        `Could not find active version of entity ${a.id} in project, which is present in the change set.`
+        `[getTouchedCanvasEntitiesFromChangeSet] Could not find active version of ${a.type} ${a.id} in project, which is present in the change set.${a.parent ? ` With parent ${(e = a.parent) == null ? void 0 : e.type} ${ee(a.parent)}` : ""}`
       );
     i.add(l.id), u.push(c);
   }), R(u);
@@ -136668,7 +136660,7 @@ const mG = {
           z.error("Error: ", E), z.error("Errored entity: ", T);
         }
       }
-    }), l;
+    }), l.open = !1, l;
   }
   toBuiltInShallowRecord() {
     const i = {};