@elizaos/plugin-research 0.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +400 -0
- package/dist/index.cjs +9366 -0
- package/dist/index.cjs.map +1 -0
- package/dist/index.js +9284 -0
- package/dist/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/package.json +80 -0
- package/src/__tests__/action-chaining.test.ts +532 -0
- package/src/__tests__/actions.test.ts +118 -0
- package/src/__tests__/cache-rate-limiter.test.ts +303 -0
- package/src/__tests__/content-extractors.test.ts +26 -0
- package/src/__tests__/deepresearch-bench-integration.test.ts +520 -0
- package/src/__tests__/deepresearch-bench-simplified.e2e.test.ts +290 -0
- package/src/__tests__/deepresearch-bench.e2e.test.ts +376 -0
- package/src/__tests__/e2e.test.ts +1870 -0
- package/src/__tests__/multi-benchmark-runner.ts +427 -0
- package/src/__tests__/providers.test.ts +156 -0
- package/src/__tests__/real-world.e2e.test.ts +788 -0
- package/src/__tests__/research-scenarios.test.ts +755 -0
- package/src/__tests__/research.e2e.test.ts +704 -0
- package/src/__tests__/research.test.ts +174 -0
- package/src/__tests__/search-providers.test.ts +174 -0
- package/src/__tests__/single-benchmark-runner.ts +735 -0
- package/src/__tests__/test-search-providers.ts +171 -0
- package/src/__tests__/verify-apis.test.ts +82 -0
- package/src/actions.ts +1677 -0
- package/src/benchmark/deepresearch-benchmark.ts +369 -0
- package/src/evaluation/research-evaluator.ts +444 -0
- package/src/examples/api-integration.md +498 -0
- package/src/examples/browserbase-integration.md +132 -0
- package/src/examples/debug-research-query.ts +162 -0
- package/src/examples/defi-code-scenarios.md +536 -0
- package/src/examples/defi-implementation-guide.md +454 -0
- package/src/examples/eliza-research-example.ts +142 -0
- package/src/examples/fix-renewable-energy-research.ts +209 -0
- package/src/examples/research-scenarios.md +408 -0
- package/src/examples/run-complete-renewable-research.ts +303 -0
- package/src/examples/run-deep-research.ts +352 -0
- package/src/examples/run-logged-research.ts +304 -0
- package/src/examples/run-real-research.ts +151 -0
- package/src/examples/save-research-output.ts +133 -0
- package/src/examples/test-file-logging.ts +199 -0
- package/src/examples/test-real-research.ts +67 -0
- package/src/examples/test-renewable-energy-research.ts +229 -0
- package/src/index.ts +28 -0
- package/src/integrations/cache.ts +128 -0
- package/src/integrations/content-extractors/firecrawl.ts +314 -0
- package/src/integrations/content-extractors/pdf-extractor.ts +350 -0
- package/src/integrations/content-extractors/playwright.ts +420 -0
- package/src/integrations/factory.ts +419 -0
- package/src/integrations/index.ts +18 -0
- package/src/integrations/rate-limiter.ts +181 -0
- package/src/integrations/search-providers/academic.ts +290 -0
- package/src/integrations/search-providers/exa.ts +205 -0
- package/src/integrations/search-providers/npm.ts +330 -0
- package/src/integrations/search-providers/pypi.ts +211 -0
- package/src/integrations/search-providers/serpapi.ts +277 -0
- package/src/integrations/search-providers/serper.ts +358 -0
- package/src/integrations/search-providers/stagehand-google.ts +87 -0
- package/src/integrations/search-providers/tavily.ts +187 -0
- package/src/processing/relevance-analyzer.ts +353 -0
- package/src/processing/research-logger.ts +450 -0
- package/src/processing/result-processor.ts +372 -0
- package/src/prompts/research-prompts.ts +419 -0
- package/src/providers/cacheProvider.ts +164 -0
- package/src/providers.ts +173 -0
- package/src/service.ts +2588 -0
- package/src/services/swe-bench.ts +286 -0
- package/src/strategies/research-strategies.ts +790 -0
- package/src/types/pdf-parse.d.ts +34 -0
- package/src/types.ts +551 -0
- package/src/verification/claim-verifier.ts +443 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
#!/usr/bin/env bun
|
|
2
|
+
/**
|
|
3
|
+
* Debug script to test research query handling
|
|
4
|
+
*/
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
import { ResearchService } from '../service';
|
|
7
|
+
import { elizaLogger, IAgentRuntime } from '@elizaos/core';
|
|
8
|
+
import { ResearchConfig, ResearchStatus } from '../types';
|
|
9
|
+
import { Character } from '@elizaos/core';
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
// Create a minimal runtime for testing
|
|
12
|
+
const createTestRuntime = (): IAgentRuntime => {
|
|
13
|
+
const testCharacter: Character = {
|
|
14
|
+
name: 'TestResearcher',
|
|
15
|
+
bio: ['A test researcher for debugging'],
|
|
16
|
+
system: 'You are a research assistant focused on technical topics.',
|
|
17
|
+
messageExamples: [],
|
|
18
|
+
postExamples: [],
|
|
19
|
+
topics: ['technology', 'science', 'research'],
|
|
20
|
+
adjectives: ['analytical', 'thorough'],
|
|
21
|
+
knowledge: [],
|
|
22
|
+
plugins: ['research'],
|
|
23
|
+
};
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
return {
|
|
26
|
+
agentId: 'test-agent-id',
|
|
27
|
+
character: testCharacter,
|
|
28
|
+
getSetting: (key: string) => {
|
|
29
|
+
// Return actual environment variables
|
|
30
|
+
const value = process.env[key];
|
|
31
|
+
elizaLogger.debug(`[Runtime] getSetting(${key}) = ${value ? '<REDACTED>' : 'null'}`);
|
|
32
|
+
return value || null;
|
|
33
|
+
},
|
|
34
|
+
getService: (name: string) => {
|
|
35
|
+
return null;
|
|
36
|
+
},
|
|
37
|
+
providers: [],
|
|
38
|
+
actions: [],
|
|
39
|
+
evaluators: [],
|
|
40
|
+
plugins: [],
|
|
41
|
+
services: new Map(),
|
|
42
|
+
messageManager: {
|
|
43
|
+
createMemory: async () => true,
|
|
44
|
+
getMemories: async () => [],
|
|
45
|
+
getMemoriesByRoomIds: async () => [],
|
|
46
|
+
getCachedEmbeddings: async () => [],
|
|
47
|
+
searchMemoriesByEmbedding: async () => [],
|
|
48
|
+
},
|
|
49
|
+
descriptionManager: {
|
|
50
|
+
createMemory: async () => true,
|
|
51
|
+
getMemories: async () => [],
|
|
52
|
+
getMemoriesByRoomIds: async () => [],
|
|
53
|
+
getCachedEmbeddings: async () => [],
|
|
54
|
+
searchMemoriesByEmbedding: async () => [],
|
|
55
|
+
},
|
|
56
|
+
documentsManager: {
|
|
57
|
+
createMemory: async () => true,
|
|
58
|
+
getMemories: async () => [],
|
|
59
|
+
getMemoriesByRoomIds: async () => [],
|
|
60
|
+
getCachedEmbeddings: async () => [],
|
|
61
|
+
searchMemoriesByEmbedding: async () => [],
|
|
62
|
+
},
|
|
63
|
+
knowledgeManager: {
|
|
64
|
+
createMemory: async () => true,
|
|
65
|
+
getMemories: async () => [],
|
|
66
|
+
getMemoriesByRoomIds: async () => [],
|
|
67
|
+
getCachedEmbeddings: async () => [],
|
|
68
|
+
searchMemoriesByEmbedding: async () => [],
|
|
69
|
+
},
|
|
70
|
+
loreManager: {
|
|
71
|
+
createMemory: async () => true,
|
|
72
|
+
getMemories: async () => [],
|
|
73
|
+
getMemoriesByRoomIds: async () => [],
|
|
74
|
+
getCachedEmbeddings: async () => [],
|
|
75
|
+
searchMemoriesByEmbedding: async () => [],
|
|
76
|
+
},
|
|
77
|
+
useModel: async (modelType: any, params: any) => {
|
|
78
|
+
// Log model calls to see what's happening
|
|
79
|
+
elizaLogger.info('[Debug] Model called with:', {
|
|
80
|
+
modelType,
|
|
81
|
+
query: params?.messages?.[params.messages.length - 1]?.content
|
|
82
|
+
});
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
// Return a simple response to avoid errors
|
|
85
|
+
return 'Based on the search results, here is a concise answer to your query.';
|
|
86
|
+
},
|
|
87
|
+
stop: async () => {},
|
|
88
|
+
} as any as IAgentRuntime;
|
|
89
|
+
};
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
async function debugResearch() {
|
|
92
|
+
elizaLogger.info('=== Starting Research Debug ===');
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
const runtime = createTestRuntime();
|
|
95
|
+
const service = new ResearchService(runtime);
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
const testQuery = "Compare the environmental and economic impacts of different renewable energy storage technologies for grid-scale deployment";
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
elizaLogger.info(`Original Query: "${testQuery}"`);
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
try {
|
|
102
|
+
// Create a research project
|
|
103
|
+
const project = await service.createResearchProject(testQuery, {
|
|
104
|
+
searchProviders: ['web'],
|
|
105
|
+
maxSearchResults: 5,
|
|
106
|
+
evaluationEnabled: false,
|
|
107
|
+
});
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
elizaLogger.info('Project created:', {
|
|
110
|
+
id: project.id,
|
|
111
|
+
query: project.query,
|
|
112
|
+
status: project.status,
|
|
113
|
+
metadata: {
|
|
114
|
+
domain: project.metadata.domain,
|
|
115
|
+
taskType: project.metadata.taskType,
|
|
116
|
+
queryPlan: {
|
|
117
|
+
mainQuery: project.metadata.queryPlan.mainQuery,
|
|
118
|
+
subQueries: project.metadata.queryPlan.subQueries.map(sq => ({
|
|
119
|
+
query: sq.query,
|
|
120
|
+
purpose: sq.purpose,
|
|
121
|
+
})),
|
|
122
|
+
},
|
|
123
|
+
},
|
|
124
|
+
});
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
// Wait a bit for the research to start
|
|
127
|
+
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 2000));
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
// Check the project status
|
|
130
|
+
const updatedProject = await service.getProject(project.id);
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
if (updatedProject) {
|
|
133
|
+
elizaLogger.info('Project after 2 seconds:', {
|
|
134
|
+
status: updatedProject.status,
|
|
135
|
+
phase: updatedProject.phase,
|
|
136
|
+
sources: updatedProject.sources.length,
|
|
137
|
+
findings: updatedProject.findings.length,
|
|
138
|
+
});
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
// Log the first few sources if any
|
|
141
|
+
if (updatedProject.sources.length > 0) {
|
|
142
|
+
elizaLogger.info('First few sources found:',
|
|
143
|
+
updatedProject.sources.slice(0, 3).map(s => ({
|
|
144
|
+
title: s.title,
|
|
145
|
+
url: s.url,
|
|
146
|
+
}))
|
|
147
|
+
);
|
|
148
|
+
}
|
|
149
|
+
}
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
// Stop the service
|
|
152
|
+
await service.stop();
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
} catch (error) {
|
|
155
|
+
elizaLogger.error('Debug failed:', error);
|
|
156
|
+
}
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
elizaLogger.info('=== Debug Complete ===');
|
|
159
|
+
}
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
// Run the debug
|
|
162
|
+
debugResearch().catch(console.error);
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,536 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Deep Research Plugin - DeFi & Code Research Scenarios
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## DeFi Research Scenarios
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
### 1. Smart Contract Security Analysis
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
**Topic**: "Critical vulnerabilities in DeFi lending protocols 2024"
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
#### Research Configuration
|
|
10
|
+
```typescript
|
|
11
|
+
const defiSecurityResearch = {
|
|
12
|
+
query: "DeFi lending protocol vulnerabilities reentrancy flash loan attacks 2024",
|
|
13
|
+
config: {
|
|
14
|
+
maxSearchResults: 25,
|
|
15
|
+
searchProviders: ['academic', 'security', 'github'],
|
|
16
|
+
enableCodeAnalysis: true,
|
|
17
|
+
prioritizeSources: ['audit reports', 'CVE databases', 'security blogs']
|
|
18
|
+
}
|
|
19
|
+
};
|
|
20
|
+
```
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
#### Expected Research Flow
|
|
23
|
+
1. **Planning Phase**: Identify major lending protocols (Aave, Compound, MakerDAO)
|
|
24
|
+
2. **Searching Phase**:
|
|
25
|
+
- Security audit reports from Certik, Trail of Bits, ConsenSys
|
|
26
|
+
- GitHub security advisories
|
|
27
|
+
- Immunefi bug bounty reports
|
|
28
|
+
3. **Analyzing Phase**: Categorize vulnerabilities by severity and exploit type
|
|
29
|
+
4. **Synthesizing Phase**: Create vulnerability taxonomy and mitigation strategies
|
|
30
|
+
5. **Reporting Phase**: Generate security assessment with code examples
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
#### Expected Findings
|
|
33
|
+
```markdown
|
|
34
|
+
## Critical DeFi Vulnerabilities Report
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
### 1. Reentrancy Attacks in Lending Protocols
|
|
37
|
+
- **Affected Protocols**: [List of vulnerable protocols]
|
|
38
|
+
- **Severity**: Critical
|
|
39
|
+
- **Example Code**:
|
|
40
|
+
```solidity
|
|
41
|
+
// Vulnerable pattern
|
|
42
|
+
function withdraw(uint amount) external {
|
|
43
|
+
require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount);
|
|
44
|
+
(bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}("");
|
|
45
|
+
require(success);
|
|
46
|
+
balances[msg.sender] -= amount; // State update after external call
|
|
47
|
+
}
|
|
48
|
+
```
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
### 2. Oracle Manipulation Vectors
|
|
51
|
+
- Flash loan price manipulation techniques
|
|
52
|
+
- Time-weighted average price (TWAP) vulnerabilities
|
|
53
|
+
- Mitigation strategies and secure oracle patterns
|
|
54
|
+
```
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
### 2. Yield Farming Strategy Optimization
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
**Topic**: "Optimal yield farming strategies across Ethereum L2s comparative analysis"
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
```typescript
|
|
61
|
+
// Research configuration for yield optimization
|
|
62
|
+
const yieldResearch = {
|
|
63
|
+
query: "Arbitrum Optimism Polygon zkSync yield farming APY comparison 2024",
|
|
64
|
+
config: {
|
|
65
|
+
maxSearchResults: 30,
|
|
66
|
+
includeMetrics: ['APY', 'TVL', 'risk scores', 'impermanent loss'],
|
|
67
|
+
timeframe: 'last_30_days',
|
|
68
|
+
chains: ['arbitrum', 'optimism', 'polygon', 'zksync']
|
|
69
|
+
}
|
|
70
|
+
};
|
|
71
|
+
```
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
#### Research Objectives
|
|
74
|
+
- Compare yield opportunities across L2 ecosystems
|
|
75
|
+
- Analyze risk-adjusted returns
|
|
76
|
+
- Identify sustainable vs. unsustainable yields
|
|
77
|
+
- Gas cost optimization strategies
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
#### Expected Deliverables
|
|
80
|
+
1. **Yield Comparison Matrix**
|
|
81
|
+
```
|
|
82
|
+
| Protocol | Chain | APY | TVL | Risk | Gas Cost |
|
|
83
|
+
|----------|----------|--------|---------|------|----------|
|
|
84
|
+
| GMX | Arbitrum | 15-25% | $450M | Med | $0.50 |
|
|
85
|
+
| Velodrome| Optimism | 20-40% | $300M | High | $0.30 |
|
|
86
|
+
```
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
2. **Risk Assessment Framework**
|
|
89
|
+
- Smart contract risk scores
|
|
90
|
+
- Liquidity depth analysis
|
|
91
|
+
- Historical volatility metrics
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
3. **Optimal Strategy Recommendations**
|
|
94
|
+
- Capital allocation models
|
|
95
|
+
- Rebalancing frequencies
|
|
96
|
+
- Cross-chain arbitrage opportunities
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
### 3. MEV (Maximum Extractable Value) Research
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
**Topic**: "MEV extraction strategies and protection mechanisms in DeFi"
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
```typescript
|
|
103
|
+
const mevResearch = {
|
|
104
|
+
query: "MEV sandwich attacks frontrunning protection Flashbots private mempools",
|
|
105
|
+
config: {
|
|
106
|
+
includeSources: ['research papers', 'MEV dashboards', 'protocol documentation'],
|
|
107
|
+
codeExamples: true,
|
|
108
|
+
realTimeData: true
|
|
109
|
+
}
|
|
110
|
+
};
|
|
111
|
+
```
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
#### Research Areas
|
|
114
|
+
1. **MEV Attack Vectors**
|
|
115
|
+
- Sandwich attacks on DEX trades
|
|
116
|
+
- Liquidation frontrunning
|
|
117
|
+
- Time-bandit attacks
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
2. **Protection Mechanisms**
|
|
120
|
+
- Private mempools (Flashbots Protect)
|
|
121
|
+
- Commit-reveal schemes
|
|
122
|
+
- Fair ordering protocols
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
3. **Code Implementation Examples**
|
|
125
|
+
```solidity
|
|
126
|
+
// MEV Protection Pattern
|
|
127
|
+
contract MEVProtectedDEX {
|
|
128
|
+
mapping(bytes32 => uint256) private commitments;
|
|
129
|
+
uint256 constant COMMIT_PERIOD = 2 blocks;
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
function commitTrade(bytes32 commitment) external {
|
|
132
|
+
commitments[commitment] = block.number;
|
|
133
|
+
}
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
function revealAndExecute(
|
|
136
|
+
uint256 amountIn,
|
|
137
|
+
uint256 minAmountOut,
|
|
138
|
+
address tokenIn,
|
|
139
|
+
address tokenOut,
|
|
140
|
+
uint256 nonce
|
|
141
|
+
) external {
|
|
142
|
+
bytes32 commitment = keccak256(
|
|
143
|
+
abi.encodePacked(msg.sender, amountIn, minAmountOut, tokenIn, tokenOut, nonce)
|
|
144
|
+
);
|
|
145
|
+
require(commitments[commitment] + COMMIT_PERIOD <= block.number, "Too early");
|
|
146
|
+
// Execute trade
|
|
147
|
+
}
|
|
148
|
+
}
|
|
149
|
+
```
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
## Code & Development Research Scenarios
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
### 4. Solidity Gas Optimization Techniques
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
**Topic**: "Advanced Solidity gas optimization patterns and assembly tricks 2024"
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
```typescript
|
|
158
|
+
const gasOptimizationResearch = {
|
|
159
|
+
query: "Solidity gas optimization assembly inline yul storage packing bitwise operations",
|
|
160
|
+
config: {
|
|
161
|
+
focusAreas: ['storage optimization', 'computation efficiency', 'calldata optimization'],
|
|
162
|
+
includeCodeSnippets: true,
|
|
163
|
+
benchmarkData: true
|
|
164
|
+
}
|
|
165
|
+
};
|
|
166
|
+
```
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
#### Expected Research Output
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
```markdown
|
|
171
|
+
## Solidity Gas Optimization Guide
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
### 1. Storage Packing Optimization
|
|
174
|
+
```solidity
|
|
175
|
+
// Before: 3 storage slots (96,000 gas)
|
|
176
|
+
contract Inefficient {
|
|
177
|
+
uint256 a; // Slot 0
|
|
178
|
+
uint128 b; // Slot 1
|
|
179
|
+
uint128 c; // Slot 2
|
|
180
|
+
}
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
// After: 2 storage slots (64,000 gas)
|
|
183
|
+
contract Optimized {
|
|
184
|
+
uint256 a; // Slot 0
|
|
185
|
+
uint128 b; // Slot 1 (packed)
|
|
186
|
+
uint128 c; // Slot 1 (packed)
|
|
187
|
+
}
|
|
188
|
+
```
|
|
189
|
+
|
|
190
|
+
### 2. Assembly Optimization Patterns
|
|
191
|
+
```solidity
|
|
192
|
+
// Memory-efficient array operations
|
|
193
|
+
function sumArray(uint256[] calldata arr) external pure returns (uint256 sum) {
|
|
194
|
+
assembly {
|
|
195
|
+
let len := calldataload(add(arr.offset, sub(0, 0x20)))
|
|
196
|
+
let data := arr.offset
|
|
197
|
+
for { let i := 0 } lt(i, len) { i := add(i, 1) } {
|
|
198
|
+
sum := add(sum, calldataload(add(data, mul(i, 0x20))))
|
|
199
|
+
}
|
|
200
|
+
}
|
|
201
|
+
}
|
|
202
|
+
```
|
|
203
|
+
|
|
204
|
+
### 3. Bitwise Operations for Flag Management
|
|
205
|
+
```solidity
|
|
206
|
+
// Using single uint256 for 256 boolean flags
|
|
207
|
+
uint256 private flags;
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
function setFlag(uint8 index, bool value) external {
|
|
210
|
+
if (value) {
|
|
211
|
+
flags |= (1 << index); // Set bit
|
|
212
|
+
} else {
|
|
213
|
+
flags &= ~(1 << index); // Clear bit
|
|
214
|
+
}
|
|
215
|
+
}
|
|
216
|
+
```
|
|
217
|
+
```
|
|
218
|
+
|
|
219
|
+
### 5. Cross-Chain Bridge Architecture Analysis
|
|
220
|
+
|
|
221
|
+
**Topic**: "Secure cross-chain bridge implementations: Architecture patterns and vulnerabilities"
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
```typescript
|
|
224
|
+
const bridgeResearch = {
|
|
225
|
+
query: "cross-chain bridge architecture security LayerZero Wormhole Axelar implementation",
|
|
226
|
+
config: {
|
|
227
|
+
technicalDepth: 'deep',
|
|
228
|
+
includeArchitectureDiagrams: true,
|
|
229
|
+
securityFocus: ['validator sets', 'message verification', 'liquidity management']
|
|
230
|
+
}
|
|
231
|
+
};
|
|
232
|
+
```
|
|
233
|
+
|
|
234
|
+
#### Research Deliverables
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
1. **Architecture Comparison**
|
|
237
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
238
|
+
graph TD
|
|
239
|
+
A[User on Chain A] --> B[Bridge Contract A]
|
|
240
|
+
B --> C{Validator Network}
|
|
241
|
+
C --> D[Bridge Contract B]
|
|
242
|
+
D --> E[User on Chain B]
|
|
243
|
+
|
|
244
|
+
subgraph "Security Layers"
|
|
245
|
+
F[Message Hashing]
|
|
246
|
+
G[Multi-Sig Validation]
|
|
247
|
+
H[Time Locks]
|
|
248
|
+
I[Fraud Proofs]
|
|
249
|
+
end
|
|
250
|
+
```
|
|
251
|
+
|
|
252
|
+
2. **Implementation Patterns**
|
|
253
|
+
```typescript
|
|
254
|
+
interface CrossChainMessage {
|
|
255
|
+
sourceChain: string;
|
|
256
|
+
destChain: string;
|
|
257
|
+
nonce: bigint;
|
|
258
|
+
sender: Address;
|
|
259
|
+
receiver: Address;
|
|
260
|
+
payload: Bytes;
|
|
261
|
+
signatures: Signature[];
|
|
262
|
+
}
|
|
263
|
+
|
|
264
|
+
class BridgeValidator {
|
|
265
|
+
async validateMessage(message: CrossChainMessage): Promise<boolean> {
|
|
266
|
+
// Verify signatures
|
|
267
|
+
const signers = await this.recoverSigners(message);
|
|
268
|
+
|
|
269
|
+
// Check if enough validators signed
|
|
270
|
+
const validSigners = signers.filter(s => this.isValidator(s));
|
|
271
|
+
return validSigners.length >= this.requiredSignatures;
|
|
272
|
+
}
|
|
273
|
+
}
|
|
274
|
+
```
|
|
275
|
+
|
|
276
|
+
### 6. Zero-Knowledge Proof Implementation Research
|
|
277
|
+
|
|
278
|
+
**Topic**: "Implementing ZK proofs in DeFi: Privacy-preserving trading and compliance"
|
|
279
|
+
|
|
280
|
+
```typescript
|
|
281
|
+
const zkResearch = {
|
|
282
|
+
query: "zero knowledge proofs DeFi implementation Tornado Cash privacy DEX zk-SNARKs Circom",
|
|
283
|
+
config: {
|
|
284
|
+
includeImplementations: ['Circom circuits', 'Solidity verifiers', 'client libraries'],
|
|
285
|
+
useCases: ['private trading', 'compliant privacy', 'proof of solvency'],
|
|
286
|
+
performanceMetrics: true
|
|
287
|
+
}
|
|
288
|
+
};
|
|
289
|
+
```
|
|
290
|
+
|
|
291
|
+
#### Expected Research Findings
|
|
292
|
+
|
|
293
|
+
```javascript
|
|
294
|
+
// Example: Private Balance Proof Circuit
|
|
295
|
+
pragma circom 2.0.0;
|
|
296
|
+
|
|
297
|
+
template PrivateBalance() {
|
|
298
|
+
signal input balance;
|
|
299
|
+
signal input commitment;
|
|
300
|
+
signal input nullifier;
|
|
301
|
+
signal output validProof;
|
|
302
|
+
|
|
303
|
+
// Commitment = Poseidon(balance, nullifier)
|
|
304
|
+
component hasher = Poseidon(2);
|
|
305
|
+
hasher.inputs[0] <== balance;
|
|
306
|
+
hasher.inputs[1] <== nullifier;
|
|
307
|
+
|
|
308
|
+
// Verify commitment matches
|
|
309
|
+
validProof <== hasher.out - commitment;
|
|
310
|
+
validProof === 0;
|
|
311
|
+
}
|
|
312
|
+
|
|
313
|
+
// Corresponding Solidity Verifier
|
|
314
|
+
contract PrivateBalanceVerifier {
|
|
315
|
+
function verifyProof(
|
|
316
|
+
uint256[2] memory a,
|
|
317
|
+
uint256[2][2] memory b,
|
|
318
|
+
uint256[2] memory c,
|
|
319
|
+
uint256[1] memory input
|
|
320
|
+
) public view returns (bool) {
|
|
321
|
+
// Groth16 verification logic
|
|
322
|
+
}
|
|
323
|
+
}
|
|
324
|
+
```
|
|
325
|
+
|
|
326
|
+
### 7. DeFi Protocol Integration Patterns
|
|
327
|
+
|
|
328
|
+
**Topic**: "Best practices for composable DeFi protocol integration and adapter patterns"
|
|
329
|
+
|
|
330
|
+
```typescript
|
|
331
|
+
const integrationResearch = {
|
|
332
|
+
query: "DeFi composability adapter pattern protocol integration Uniswap Aave Compound interfaces",
|
|
333
|
+
config: {
|
|
334
|
+
patterns: ['adapter', 'proxy', 'diamond', 'plugin'],
|
|
335
|
+
examples: ['flash loan arbitrage', 'yield aggregation', 'leveraged farming'],
|
|
336
|
+
gasAnalysis: true
|
|
337
|
+
}
|
|
338
|
+
};
|
|
339
|
+
```
|
|
340
|
+
|
|
341
|
+
#### Integration Pattern Examples
|
|
342
|
+
|
|
343
|
+
```solidity
|
|
344
|
+
// Universal DeFi Adapter Pattern
|
|
345
|
+
interface IDeFiAdapter {
|
|
346
|
+
function deposit(address asset, uint256 amount) external returns (uint256 shares);
|
|
347
|
+
function withdraw(address asset, uint256 shares) external returns (uint256 amount);
|
|
348
|
+
function getBalance(address user, address asset) external view returns (uint256);
|
|
349
|
+
function getAPY(address asset) external view returns (uint256);
|
|
350
|
+
}
|
|
351
|
+
|
|
352
|
+
// Aave Adapter Implementation
|
|
353
|
+
contract AaveAdapter is IDeFiAdapter {
|
|
354
|
+
ILendingPool constant aave = ILendingPool(0x...);
|
|
355
|
+
|
|
356
|
+
function deposit(address asset, uint256 amount) external returns (uint256) {
|
|
357
|
+
IERC20(asset).transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount);
|
|
358
|
+
IERC20(asset).approve(address(aave), amount);
|
|
359
|
+
aave.deposit(asset, amount, msg.sender, 0);
|
|
360
|
+
return IERC20(aToken[asset]).balanceOf(msg.sender);
|
|
361
|
+
}
|
|
362
|
+
}
|
|
363
|
+
|
|
364
|
+
// Composable Yield Optimizer
|
|
365
|
+
contract YieldOptimizer {
|
|
366
|
+
mapping(string => IDeFiAdapter) public adapters;
|
|
367
|
+
|
|
368
|
+
function rebalance(string[] memory protocols, uint256[] memory allocations) external {
|
|
369
|
+
// Withdraw from all positions
|
|
370
|
+
// Recalculate optimal allocation
|
|
371
|
+
// Deposit to new positions
|
|
372
|
+
}
|
|
373
|
+
}
|
|
374
|
+
```
|
|
375
|
+
|
|
376
|
+
### 8. Real-time DeFi Analytics Pipeline
|
|
377
|
+
|
|
378
|
+
**Topic**: "Building real-time DeFi analytics: Event processing and data pipeline architecture"
|
|
379
|
+
|
|
380
|
+
```typescript
|
|
381
|
+
const analyticsResearch = {
|
|
382
|
+
query: "DeFi analytics real-time event processing The Graph Protocol Dune Analytics architecture",
|
|
383
|
+
config: {
|
|
384
|
+
technologies: ['event streaming', 'GraphQL', 'time-series databases'],
|
|
385
|
+
metrics: ['TVL tracking', 'volume analysis', 'user behavior', 'risk metrics'],
|
|
386
|
+
scalability: 'high'
|
|
387
|
+
}
|
|
388
|
+
};
|
|
389
|
+
```
|
|
390
|
+
|
|
391
|
+
#### Analytics Architecture
|
|
392
|
+
|
|
393
|
+
```typescript
|
|
394
|
+
// Event Processing Pipeline
|
|
395
|
+
class DeFiEventProcessor {
|
|
396
|
+
private eventQueue: Queue<ContractEvent>;
|
|
397
|
+
private processors: Map<string, EventProcessor>;
|
|
398
|
+
|
|
399
|
+
async processBlock(blockNumber: number) {
|
|
400
|
+
const events = await this.fetchBlockEvents(blockNumber);
|
|
401
|
+
|
|
402
|
+
for (const event of events) {
|
|
403
|
+
const processor = this.processors.get(event.name);
|
|
404
|
+
if (processor) {
|
|
405
|
+
const metric = await processor.process(event);
|
|
406
|
+
await this.publishMetric(metric);
|
|
407
|
+
}
|
|
408
|
+
}
|
|
409
|
+
}
|
|
410
|
+
}
|
|
411
|
+
|
|
412
|
+
// GraphQL Schema for DeFi Analytics
|
|
413
|
+
type DeFiProtocol {
|
|
414
|
+
id: ID!
|
|
415
|
+
name: String!
|
|
416
|
+
tvl: BigDecimal!
|
|
417
|
+
volume24h: BigDecimal!
|
|
418
|
+
users24h: Int!
|
|
419
|
+
pools: [LiquidityPool!]!
|
|
420
|
+
historicalData(first: Int, skip: Int): [ProtocolDayData!]!
|
|
421
|
+
}
|
|
422
|
+
|
|
423
|
+
type LiquidityPool {
|
|
424
|
+
id: ID!
|
|
425
|
+
token0: Token!
|
|
426
|
+
token1: Token!
|
|
427
|
+
reserve0: BigDecimal!
|
|
428
|
+
reserve1: BigDecimal!
|
|
429
|
+
volumeUSD: BigDecimal!
|
|
430
|
+
apr: BigDecimal!
|
|
431
|
+
}
|
|
432
|
+
```
|
|
433
|
+
|
|
434
|
+
## Advanced Research Combinations
|
|
435
|
+
|
|
436
|
+
### 9. AI-Powered Smart Contract Auditing
|
|
437
|
+
|
|
438
|
+
**Topic**: "Machine learning approaches to smart contract vulnerability detection"
|
|
439
|
+
|
|
440
|
+
```typescript
|
|
441
|
+
const aiAuditResearch = {
|
|
442
|
+
query: "ML smart contract audit vulnerability detection neural networks static analysis Slither",
|
|
443
|
+
config: {
|
|
444
|
+
approaches: ['static analysis', 'symbolic execution', 'deep learning'],
|
|
445
|
+
datasets: ['verified contracts', 'known vulnerabilities', 'audit reports'],
|
|
446
|
+
tools: ['Slither', 'Mythril', 'ML frameworks']
|
|
447
|
+
}
|
|
448
|
+
};
|
|
449
|
+
```
|
|
450
|
+
|
|
451
|
+
### 10. Decentralized Orderbook Implementation
|
|
452
|
+
|
|
453
|
+
**Topic**: "High-performance decentralized orderbook designs for DeFi"
|
|
454
|
+
|
|
455
|
+
```typescript
|
|
456
|
+
const orderbookResearch = {
|
|
457
|
+
query: "decentralized orderbook implementation Serum dYdX performance optimization L2",
|
|
458
|
+
config: {
|
|
459
|
+
focus: ['data structures', 'matching algorithms', 'state management'],
|
|
460
|
+
performance: ['latency', 'throughput', 'gas efficiency'],
|
|
461
|
+
examples: ['on-chain', 'hybrid', 'rollup-based']
|
|
462
|
+
}
|
|
463
|
+
};
|
|
464
|
+
```
|
|
465
|
+
|
|
466
|
+
## Research Integration Examples
|
|
467
|
+
|
|
468
|
+
### Automated Research Pipeline for DeFi Protocols
|
|
469
|
+
|
|
470
|
+
```typescript
|
|
471
|
+
// Automated weekly DeFi protocol research
|
|
472
|
+
async function automatedDeFiResearch(runtime: IAgentRuntime) {
|
|
473
|
+
const protocols = ['Uniswap', 'Aave', 'Curve', 'Compound', 'MakerDAO'];
|
|
474
|
+
const researchService = runtime.getService<ResearchService>('research');
|
|
475
|
+
|
|
476
|
+
for (const protocol of protocols) {
|
|
477
|
+
// Security research
|
|
478
|
+
const securityProject = await researchService.createResearchProject(
|
|
479
|
+
`${protocol} security vulnerabilities exploits 2024`,
|
|
480
|
+
{ maxSearchResults: 20 }
|
|
481
|
+
);
|
|
482
|
+
|
|
483
|
+
// Performance research
|
|
484
|
+
const performanceProject = await researchService.createResearchProject(
|
|
485
|
+
`${protocol} gas optimization performance improvements`,
|
|
486
|
+
{ maxSearchResults: 15 }
|
|
487
|
+
);
|
|
488
|
+
|
|
489
|
+
// Integration research
|
|
490
|
+
const integrationProject = await researchService.createResearchProject(
|
|
491
|
+
`${protocol} integration patterns composability best practices`,
|
|
492
|
+
{ maxSearchResults: 10 }
|
|
493
|
+
);
|
|
494
|
+
}
|
|
495
|
+
|
|
496
|
+
// Generate comparative report
|
|
497
|
+
await generateComparativeReport(protocols);
|
|
498
|
+
}
|
|
499
|
+
```
|
|
500
|
+
|
|
501
|
+
### Real-time Vulnerability Monitoring
|
|
502
|
+
|
|
503
|
+
```typescript
|
|
504
|
+
// Monitor for new DeFi vulnerabilities
|
|
505
|
+
class DeFiSecurityMonitor {
|
|
506
|
+
constructor(private researchService: ResearchService) {}
|
|
507
|
+
|
|
508
|
+
async monitorVulnerabilities() {
|
|
509
|
+
const criticalTerms = [
|
|
510
|
+
'critical vulnerability',
|
|
511
|
+
'exploit',
|
|
512
|
+
'hack',
|
|
513
|
+
'security incident',
|
|
514
|
+
'emergency pause'
|
|
515
|
+
];
|
|
516
|
+
|
|
517
|
+
for (const term of criticalTerms) {
|
|
518
|
+
const project = await this.researchService.createResearchProject(
|
|
519
|
+
`DeFi ${term} last 24 hours`,
|
|
520
|
+
{
|
|
521
|
+
maxSearchResults: 50,
|
|
522
|
+
timeframe: '24h',
|
|
523
|
+
priority: 'high'
|
|
524
|
+
}
|
|
525
|
+
);
|
|
526
|
+
|
|
527
|
+
// Alert on critical findings
|
|
528
|
+
project.on('finding', (finding) => {
|
|
529
|
+
if (finding.relevance > 0.9) {
|
|
530
|
+
this.sendSecurityAlert(finding);
|
|
531
|
+
}
|
|
532
|
+
});
|
|
533
|
+
}
|
|
534
|
+
}
|
|
535
|
+
}
|
|
536
|
+
```
|