@elitedcs/ghl-mcp 3.76.0 → 3.77.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +58 -0
- package/README.md +1 -1
- package/dist/index.js +8681 -2023
- package/guide/guide.html +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills/blueprint/README.md +1 -1
- package/skills/blueprint/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/skills/blueprint/references/approval-view.md +2 -2
package/CHANGELOG.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,63 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
# Changelog
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
+
## 3.77.1 — the Blueprint can build a client account, and had been saying it could not
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
If you ran the Blueprint, it planned the account, showed you the two checklists, and then
|
|
6
|
+
printed this at the bottom:
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
> _v1 stops here. When you approve, the automatic list is ready for one-shot staging (phase 2)._
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
**That was wrong, and it had been wrong for months.** The Blueprint builds. You approve the
|
|
11
|
+
plan, it dry-runs the automatic list without writing anything, shows you exactly what it
|
|
12
|
+
would create, and on your go it builds: pipelines and stages, custom fields, tags, custom
|
|
13
|
+
values, calendars, forms, funnel structure, templates, and workflows chained and verified,
|
|
14
|
+
each object read back before anything that depends on it is created.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
The plan-only sentence was true of the first version. The builder was finished afterwards
|
|
17
|
+
and nobody removed the old wording. It was in four files, and those files ship inside the
|
|
18
|
+
package, so it has been on your machine reading the wrong thing to you the whole time.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
**Two of them were worse than a stale sentence.** One instructed the assistant to tell you
|
|
21
|
+
execution was not available yet, so it was not merely present, it was being read out. And
|
|
22
|
+
the description of `apply_build_plan` itself said `execute = live writes (not yet enabled)`
|
|
23
|
+
three hundred lines above the code that performs those writes, which means an assistant
|
|
24
|
+
reading that description could decline to run a build you had just asked for. Meanwhile the
|
|
25
|
+
same skill file gave the correct build instruction further down, so it contradicted itself
|
|
26
|
+
and the half you saw was the false one.
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
**What has not changed is the gate.** Nothing is built until you say so, the dry run still
|
|
29
|
+
writes nothing, and workflows are still created as drafts unless you ask for them
|
|
30
|
+
published. The old wording carried that promise correctly, which is a large part of why the
|
|
31
|
+
false half went unnoticed. The gate stays; only the claim that building does not exist is
|
|
32
|
+
gone.
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
A test now fails the build on any of the six ways this was phrased, anywhere in the skill or
|
|
35
|
+
in that tool, so it cannot come back quietly.
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
Counts unchanged: 248 tools, 51 modules, free tier 112.
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
## 3.77.0 — the account you aimed at, even when two things run at once
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
`switch_location` used to change your API key first and your location a moment later.
|
|
42
|
+
A failed switch was already put back exactly as it was, so that part was never the
|
|
43
|
+
problem. The gap in between was: anything running alongside the switch could read the
|
|
44
|
+
**new account's key against the old account's id**. Claude issues tool calls in
|
|
45
|
+
parallel, so that window was real, not theoretical.
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
The switch now verifies the new account with a throwaway probe and touches nothing until
|
|
48
|
+
that succeeds. Key and location are then committed together with no pause between them,
|
|
49
|
+
so another call in flight sees either the old account or the new one, never half of each.
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
**`health_check` stopped quoting you a tool count you do not have.** On a licence that
|
|
52
|
+
does not include every module it reported the full registered number, which is not what
|
|
53
|
+
you can run. It now states the tools your licence includes, and says separately how many
|
|
54
|
+
are not included and answer with a notice.
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
Everything else added in this release sits outside the GHL Command licence and answers
|
|
57
|
+
with a notice, the same as the tools already in that position.
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
Counts unchanged: 248 tools, 51 modules, free tier 112.
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
3
61
|
## 3.76.0 — the workflows you cannot edit, and the audit that said they were fine
|
|
4
62
|
|
|
5
63
|
GoHighLevel tightened what its workflow builder will save. Workflows built from older
|
package/README.md
CHANGED