@eir-labs/coltrane 0.24.14 → 0.24.16

package/domain_types/user-flow-verdict.json

@@ -13,43 +13,87 @@
           "tool_pick_appropriate": {
             "type": "object",
             "properties": {
-              "score": { "type": ["number", "null"] },
-              "rationale": { "type": "string" }
+              "score": {
+                "type": [
+                  "number",
+                  "null"
+                ]
+              },
+              "rationale": {
+                "type": "string"
+              }
             }
           },
           "response_faithful": {
             "type": "object",
             "properties": {
-              "score": { "type": ["number", "null"] },
-              "rationale": { "type": "string" }
+              "score": {
+                "type": [
+                  "number",
+                  "null"
+                ]
+              },
+              "rationale": {
+                "type": "string"
+              }
             }
           },
           "genome_state_valid": {
             "type": "object",
             "properties": {
-              "score": { "type": ["number", "null"] },
-              "rationale": { "type": "string" }
+              "score": {
+                "type": [
+                  "number",
+                  "null"
+                ]
+              },
+              "rationale": {
+                "type": "string"
+              }
             }
           },
           "typed_error_on_malformed": {
             "type": "object",
             "properties": {
-              "score": { "type": ["number", "null"] },
-              "rationale": { "type": "string" }
+              "score": {
+                "type": [
+                  "number",
+                  "null"
+                ]
+              },
+              "rationale": {
+                "type": "string"
+              }
             }
           },
           "multi_turn_continuity": {
             "type": "object",
             "properties": {
-              "score": { "type": ["number", "null"] },
-              "rationale": { "type": "string" }
+              "score": {
+                "type": [
+                  "number",
+                  "null"
+                ]
+              },
+              "rationale": {
+                "type": "string"
+              }
             }
           }
         }
       },
-      "overall_score": { "type": ["number", "null"] },
-      "overall_pass": { "type": "boolean" },
-      "top_finding": { "type": "string" }
+      "overall_score": {
+        "type": [
+          "number",
+          "null"
+        ]
+      },
+      "overall_pass": {
+        "type": "boolean"
+      },
+      "top_finding": {
+        "type": "string"
+      }
     }
   },
   "required_fields": [

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@eir-labs/coltrane",
-  "version": "0.24.14",
+  "version": "0.24.16",
   "description": "A methodology engine \u2014 a typed substrate for defining agents, composing multi-phase standards, dispatching gigs, and sealing every output to a content-addressed ledger. Ships as an MCP server.",
   "type": "module",
   "license": "Apache-2.0",

package/standards/lineage-adopt-v0.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "slug": "lineage-adopt-v0",
   "domain": "lineage",
   "status": "active",
-  "description": "A LINEAGE ADOPTION brings an already-composed lineage-record to a human seat and nowhere else. It runs no scout, draws no edge, and composes nothing: its single chair is the approval office, seeded directly with the record under review. It exists because the approve office was reachable only as the tail of lineage-pass-v1, which meant a record composed by any other route could never be promoted. lineage-reweave-v0 is exactly that route \u2014 it re-draws the synthesis over reused and deepened seeds and seals a lineage-record with no human chair anywhere in its phase graph, so the strongest record a lineage effort produces was structurally unadoptable. A composition standard should not have to carry an approval office to make its output signable, and an approval office should not have to re-run a synthesis to reach a record. This standard is that seam, held once.",
+  "description": "A LINEAGE ADOPTION brings an already-composed lineage-record to a human seat and nowhere else. It runs no scout, draws no edge, and composes nothing: its single chair is the approval office, seeded directly with the record under review. It exists because the approve office was reachable only as the tail of lineage-pass-v1, which meant a record composed by any other route could never be promoted. lineage-reweave-v0 is exactly that route — it re-draws the synthesis over reused and deepened seeds and seals a lineage-record with no human chair anywhere in its phase graph, so the strongest record a lineage effort produces was structurally unadoptable. A composition standard should not have to carry an approval office to make its output signable, and an approval office should not have to re-run a synthesis to reach a record. This standard is that seam, held once.",
   "agent_slugs": [],
   "phases": [
     {
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
-      "intent": "A human approval office, and the only seat in this standard. The incumbent reviews the seeded lineage-record and either seals a passing lineage-verdict \u2014 which is what promotes the record to first-class lineage attached to an institution \u2014 or refuses it. An ENTRY chair (depends_on []): the record is supplied by the dispatch payload rather than produced upstream, which is the whole point \u2014 a record composed anywhere, by a pass or by a reweave, can be brought here without re-running the work that made it. The chair is seeded with BOTH the record under review and the adoption target naming which institution it would ground \u2014 the attachment is a property of this act, not of the record or the verdict, so it arrives here and nowhere else. A run that reaches this office unapproved PARKS awaiting the seal; nothing is adopted on an absent yes, and a refusal is a decision that gets recorded rather than a silence that gets forgotten."
+      "intent": "A human approval office, and the only seat in this standard. The incumbent reviews the seeded lineage-record and either seals a passing lineage-verdict — which is what promotes the record to first-class lineage attached to an institution — or refuses it. An ENTRY chair (depends_on []): the record is supplied by the dispatch payload rather than produced upstream, which is the whole point — a record composed anywhere, by a pass or by a reweave, can be brought here without re-running the work that made it. The chair is seeded with BOTH the record under review and the adoption target naming which institution it would ground — the attachment is a property of this act, not of the record or the verdict, so it arrives here and nowhere else. A run that reaches this office unapproved PARKS awaiting the seal; nothing is adopted on an absent yes, and a refusal is a decision that gets recorded rather than a silence that gets forgotten."
     }
   ],
   "input_types": [

package/standards/lineage-deepen-v0.json

@@ -14,14 +14,22 @@
           "role": "identify-external",
           "agent_slug": "lineage-scout-external",
           "depends_on": [],
-          "input_contract": ["lineage-question"],
-          "output_contract": ["lineage-hit"],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "lineage-question"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "lineage-hit"
+          ],
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
       "intent": "Re-run the outward sense alone. identify-external takes the sharpened lineage-question and sweeps the external body of prior work with web tools, verifying each source live and sealing grounded lineage-hits — the deepened external reading. It holds no internal grant and draws no connection: it produces hits the re-weave can be held to, nothing more."
     }
   ],
-  "input_types": ["lineage-question"],
-  "output_types": ["lineage-hit"]
+  "input_types": [
+    "lineage-question"
+  ],
+  "output_types": [
+    "lineage-hit"
+  ]
 }

package/standards/lineage-pass-v1.json

@@ -17,16 +17,24 @@
           "role": "identify-external",
           "agent_slug": "lineage-scout-external",
           "depends_on": [],
-          "input_contract": ["lineage-question"],
-          "output_contract": ["lineage-hit"],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "lineage-question"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "lineage-hit"
+          ],
           "required_skills": []
         },
         {
           "role": "identify-internal",
           "agent_slug": "lineage-scout-internal",
           "depends_on": [],
-          "input_contract": ["lineage-question"],
-          "output_contract": ["internal-inventory"],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "lineage-question"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "internal-inventory"
+          ],
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
@@ -38,9 +46,17 @@
         {
           "role": "associate",
           "agent_slug": "lineage-weaver",
-          "depends_on": ["identify-external", "identify-internal"],
-          "input_contract": ["lineage-hit", "internal-inventory"],
-          "output_contract": ["lineage-map"],
+          "depends_on": [
+            "identify-external",
+            "identify-internal"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "lineage-hit",
+            "internal-inventory"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "lineage-map"
+          ],
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
@@ -52,9 +68,15 @@
         {
           "role": "assess",
           "agent_slug": "lineage-weaver",
-          "depends_on": ["associate"],
-          "input_contract": ["lineage-map"],
-          "output_contract": ["alignment-plan"],
+          "depends_on": [
+            "associate"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "lineage-map"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "alignment-plan"
+          ],
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
@@ -66,9 +88,19 @@
         {
           "role": "compose",
           "agent_slug": "lineage-scribe",
-          "depends_on": ["identify-external", "identify-internal", "associate", "assess"],
-          "input_contract": ["lineage-map", "alignment-plan"],
-          "output_contract": ["lineage-record"],
+          "depends_on": [
+            "identify-external",
+            "identify-internal",
+            "associate",
+            "assess"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "lineage-map",
+            "alignment-plan"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "lineage-record"
+          ],
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
@@ -81,9 +113,13 @@
           "role": "approve",
           "agent_slug": "",
           "human": true,
-          "depends_on": ["compose"],
+          "depends_on": [
+            "compose"
+          ],
           "input_contract": [],
-          "output_contract": ["lineage-verdict"],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "lineage-verdict"
+          ],
           "optional_outputs": [],
           "required_skills": []
         }
@@ -91,6 +127,13 @@
       "intent": "A human approval office. The incumbent reviews the sealed lineage-record and either seals a passing lineage-verdict — which is what promotes the record to first-class lineage attached to an institution — or refuses it. A run that reaches this office unapproved PARKS awaiting the seal; nothing is adopted on an absent yes."
     }
   ],
-  "input_types": ["lineage-question"],
-  "output_types": ["lineage-record", "lineage-verdict", "internal-inventory", "lineage-hit"]
+  "input_types": [
+    "lineage-question"
+  ],
+  "output_types": [
+    "lineage-record",
+    "lineage-verdict",
+    "internal-inventory",
+    "lineage-hit"
+  ]
 }

package/standards/lineage-reweave-v0.json

@@ -15,8 +15,13 @@
           "role": "associate",
           "agent_slug": "lineage-weaver",
           "depends_on": [],
-          "input_contract": ["lineage-hit", "internal-inventory"],
-          "output_contract": ["lineage-map"],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "lineage-hit",
+            "internal-inventory"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "lineage-map"
+          ],
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
@@ -28,9 +33,15 @@
         {
           "role": "assess",
           "agent_slug": "lineage-weaver",
-          "depends_on": ["associate"],
-          "input_contract": ["lineage-map"],
-          "output_contract": ["alignment-plan"],
+          "depends_on": [
+            "associate"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "lineage-map"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "alignment-plan"
+          ],
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
@@ -42,15 +53,28 @@
         {
           "role": "compose",
           "agent_slug": "lineage-scribe",
-          "depends_on": ["associate", "assess"],
-          "input_contract": ["lineage-map", "alignment-plan"],
-          "output_contract": ["lineage-record"],
+          "depends_on": [
+            "associate",
+            "assess"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "lineage-map",
+            "alignment-plan"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "lineage-record"
+          ],
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
       "intent": "Compose the re-woven lineage-record: the identified external body, the reused internal inventory, the re-drawn connections, the gap, and the alignment recommendation — carrying each connection's both-side grounding through so the artifact is checkable citation by citation. Create only from upstream; introduce no new source."
     }
   ],
-  "input_types": ["lineage-hit", "internal-inventory"],
-  "output_types": ["lineage-record"]
+  "input_types": [
+    "lineage-hit",
+    "internal-inventory"
+  ],
+  "output_types": [
+    "lineage-record"
+  ]
 }

package/standards/patent-triage-v1.json

@@ -16,69 +16,227 @@
     {
       "name": "analyze",
       "chairs": [
-        { "role": "analyze", "agent_slug": "disclosure-analyst", "depends_on": [], "input_contract": [], "output_contract": ["invention-analysis"], "required_skills": [] }
+        {
+          "role": "analyze",
+          "agent_slug": "disclosure-analyst",
+          "depends_on": [],
+          "input_contract": [],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "invention-analysis"
+          ],
+          "required_skills": []
+        }
       ],
       "intent": "De-spin the disclosure: state the real technical contribution, contrast it with what the inventor claims is novel, enumerate candidate inventive concepts (plural) and embodiments."
     },
     {
       "name": "claim",
       "chairs": [
-        { "role": "claim", "agent_slug": "claim-architect", "depends_on": ["analyze"], "input_contract": ["invention-analysis"], "output_contract": ["claim-draft"], "required_skills": ["claim-element-decompose", "diamond-cutting-discipline"] }
+        {
+          "role": "claim",
+          "agent_slug": "claim-architect",
+          "depends_on": [
+            "analyze"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "invention-analysis"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "claim-draft"
+          ],
+          "required_skills": [
+            "claim-element-decompose",
+            "diamond-cutting-discipline"
+          ]
+        }
       ],
       "intent": "Cut the broadest defensible independent claim AND a dependent fallback tree; grade the cleave; name every stripped feature as representation vs load-bearing."
     },
     {
       "name": "search",
       "chairs": [
-        { "role": "search", "agent_slug": "prior-art-scout", "depends_on": ["claim"], "input_contract": ["claim-draft"], "output_contract": ["prior-art-hit", "novelty-verdict", "coverage-report"], "required_skills": ["query-expand", "patent-fetch", "citation-verify"] }
+        {
+          "role": "search",
+          "agent_slug": "prior-art-scout",
+          "depends_on": [
+            "claim"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "claim-draft"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "prior-art-hit",
+            "novelty-verdict",
+            "coverage-report"
+          ],
+          "required_skills": [
+            "query-expand",
+            "patent-fetch",
+            "citation-verify"
+          ]
+        }
       ],
       "intent": "Search patents (USPTO PatentsView) AND literature per claim element; retrieve + verify each hit (fetched, not snippet); emit a coverage-report attesting which corpora were actually searched."
     },
     {
       "name": "map",
       "chairs": [
-        { "role": "map", "agent_slug": "anticipation-mapper", "depends_on": ["claim", "search"], "input_contract": ["claim-draft", "prior-art-hit"], "output_contract": ["novelty-analysis"], "required_skills": ["element-mapping-matrix"] }
+        {
+          "role": "map",
+          "agent_slug": "anticipation-mapper",
+          "depends_on": [
+            "claim",
+            "search"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "claim-draft",
+            "prior-art-hit"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "novelty-analysis"
+          ],
+          "required_skills": [
+            "element-mapping-matrix"
+          ]
+        }
       ],
       "intent": "Build the element x reference anticipation matrix (§102 per element + §103 obviousness combinations) with a derived coverage_fraction. Evidence only — no rejection call."
     },
     {
       "name": "examine",
       "chairs": [
-        { "role": "examine", "agent_slug": "patent-examiner", "depends_on": ["claim", "map"], "input_contract": ["claim-draft", "novelty-analysis"], "output_contract": ["examiner-rejection"], "required_skills": ["statutory-checklist"] }
+        {
+          "role": "examine",
+          "agent_slug": "patent-examiner",
+          "depends_on": [
+            "claim",
+            "map"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "claim-draft",
+            "novelty-analysis"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "examiner-rejection"
+          ],
+          "required_skills": [
+            "statutory-checklist"
+          ]
+        }
       ],
       "intent": "Adversary: try to reject the claim on every statute (§101/§102/§103/§112) via the statutory checklist; silence on a statute is not a clear. The only seat that rejects."
     },
     {
       "name": "amend",
       "chairs": [
-        { "role": "amend", "agent_slug": "claim-amender", "depends_on": ["claim", "examine"], "input_contract": ["claim-draft", "examiner-rejection"], "output_contract": ["examine-round-record"], "required_skills": ["claim-element-decompose"] }
+        {
+          "role": "amend",
+          "agent_slug": "claim-amender",
+          "depends_on": [
+            "claim",
+            "examine"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "claim-draft",
+            "examiner-rejection"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "examine-round-record"
+          ],
+          "required_skills": [
+            "claim-element-decompose"
+          ]
+        }
       ],
       "intent": "Narrow the claim to overcome the rejections or concede; seal an examine-round-record chained to its predecessor so survival is recomputable across rounds."
     },
     {
       "name": "judge",
       "chairs": [
-        { "role": "judge", "agent_slug": "triage-judge", "depends_on": ["search", "map", "examine", "amend"], "input_contract": ["coverage-report", "novelty-analysis", "examiner-rejection", "examine-round-record"], "output_contract": ["triage-verdict", "verdict-record"], "required_skills": ["citation-verify"] }
+        {
+          "role": "judge",
+          "agent_slug": "triage-judge",
+          "depends_on": [
+            "search",
+            "map",
+            "examine",
+            "amend"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "coverage-report",
+            "novelty-analysis",
+            "examiner-rejection",
+            "examine-round-record"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "triage-verdict",
+            "verdict-record"
+          ],
+          "required_skills": [
+            "citation-verify"
+          ]
+        }
       ],
       "intent": "Render the CANDIDATE verdict (FILEABLE / REFINE-FIRST / NOT-FILEABLE / INSUFFICIENT-EVIDENCE) from the evidence and seal a verdict-record with predecessor links to the disclosure, coverage-report, and final examine-round-record. The hard gate is a separate deterministic chair downstream — the judge states its honest recommendation; it does not enforce the gate itself."
     },
     {
       "name": "gate",
       "chairs": [
-        { "role": "gate", "skill_slug": "verdict-gate", "depends_on": ["judge", "search", "amend"], "input_contract": ["triage-verdict", "coverage-report", "examine-round-record"], "output_contract": ["triage-verdict"], "required_skills": [] }
+        {
+          "role": "gate",
+          "skill_slug": "verdict-gate",
+          "depends_on": [
+            "judge",
+            "search",
+            "amend"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "triage-verdict",
+            "coverage-report",
+            "examine-round-record"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "triage-verdict"
+          ],
+          "required_skills": []
+        }
       ],
       "intent": "The hard guard, as deterministic code (no model): downgrade a FILEABLE candidate to INSUFFICIENT-EVIDENCE unless a patent corpus was actually searched (coverage gate) AND the claim survived >=1 examine round (survival gate). Seals the final, gated triage-verdict the drafter acts on — runtime enforcement, not prompt guidance."
     },
     {
       "name": "draft",
       "chairs": [
-        { "role": "draft", "agent_slug": "spec-drafter", "depends_on": ["claim", "gate"], "input_contract": ["claim-draft", "triage-verdict"], "output_contract": ["provisional-draft"], "required_skills": [] }
+        {
+          "role": "draft",
+          "agent_slug": "spec-drafter",
+          "depends_on": [
+            "claim",
+            "gate"
+          ],
+          "input_contract": [
+            "claim-draft",
+            "triage-verdict"
+          ],
+          "output_contract": [
+            "provisional-draft"
+          ],
+          "required_skills": []
+        }
       ],
       "intent": "Only on a FILEABLE verdict (the gated one from the gate chair): a provisional with real §112 enablement — at least one worked embodiment + how-to-build, the surviving claim tree, and an abstract. On any other verdict, nothing."
     }
   ],
   "max_examine_rounds": 3,
-  "eval_slugs": ["claim-tree-eval", "enablement-eval"],
-  "input_types": ["invention-disclosure"],
-  "output_types": ["triage-verdict", "verdict-record", "provisional-draft"]
+  "eval_slugs": [
+    "claim-tree-eval",
+    "enablement-eval"
+  ],
+  "input_types": [
+    "invention-disclosure"
+  ],
+  "output_types": [
+    "triage-verdict",
+    "verdict-record",
+    "provisional-draft"
+  ]
 }

package/standards/product-design-v1.json

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
-      "intent": "First divergence. Hold the question open: observations with their locators, the audience segments it lands differently for, the needs the current state does not serve, the adjacent questions the exploration surfaced, and an honest statement of how far the exploration actually reached. Findings only \u2014 nothing is chosen here."
+      "intent": "First divergence. Hold the question open: observations with their locators, the audience segments it lands differently for, the needs the current state does not serve, the adjacent questions the exploration surfaced, and an honest statement of how far the exploration actually reached. Findings only — nothing is chosen here."
     },
     {
       "name": "define",
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
-      "intent": "First convergence, and the seam between the diamonds. Name the ONE problem the second diamond opens on, what is out of scope, the success criteria a stranger could check \u2014 and, explicitly, the problems the brief surfaced that this definition discarded, each with its reason. Sealed as a Plan because the definition sequences what follows."
+      "intent": "First convergence, and the seam between the diamonds. Name the ONE problem the second diamond opens on, what is out of scope, the success criteria a stranger could check — and, explicitly, the problems the brief surfaced that this definition discarded, each with its reason. Sealed as a Plan because the definition sequences what follows."
     },
     {
       "name": "develop",
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
           ]
         }
       ],
-      "intent": "Second divergence, built rather than described. The concept states its mechanism step by step, names which success criteria it answers, and carries its tradeoffs and open questions \u2014 a concept presented as settled cannot be evaluated against the contest it hides."
+      "intent": "Second divergence, built rather than described. The concept states its mechanism step by step, names which success criteria it answers, and carries its tradeoffs and open questions — a concept presented as settled cannot be evaluated against the contest it hides."
     },
     {
       "name": "deliver",
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
           "required_skills": []
         }
       ],
-      "intent": "Second convergence. Measure the concept against the definition as sealed, criterion by criterion, and separate what was observed from what was reasoned about \u2014 most design criteria cannot be executed, so a verdict that does not say so overstates its own evidence. Where the concept is sound but the problem was the wrong one, the recommendation returns the run to the first seam."
+      "intent": "Second convergence. Measure the concept against the definition as sealed, criterion by criterion, and separate what was observed from what was reasoned about — most design criteria cannot be executed, so a verdict that does not say so overstates its own evidence. Where the concept is sound but the problem was the wrong one, the recommendation returns the run to the first seam."
     },
     {
       "name": "approve",