@edupia-tutor/spec-driven-docs 0.14.0

package/commands/generate-bdd.md

@@ -0,0 +1,1054 @@
+# /generate-bdd — Generate BDD Feature Files
+
+## Gate
+# Gate — Universal Entry Procedure
+
+Every command must execute this gate before proceeding with its specific logic.
+
+## Step 0 — Sub-Agent Mode Check
+
+Before anything else, check if `$ARGUMENTS` is a JSON payload from an orchestrator:
+
+1. Attempt to parse `$ARGUMENTS` as JSON.
+2. If it parses successfully **and** contains `"_agent_mode": true`:
+   - **Skip Steps 1, 2, and 3 of this Gate entirely.**
+   - Set target file = `payload.target_file`
+   - Set loaded context = `payload.context` (do NOT run context-loader.md)
+   - Set UC scope = `payload.uc_id` (process only this UC)
+   - Set line range = `payload.uc_section` (read only that PRD section)
+   - Proceed directly to the command-specific logic.
+3. If `$ARGUMENTS` is not JSON or `_agent_mode` is absent → continue to Step 1 (normal mode).
+
+## Step 0-B — Model Check
+
+*Skip this step if `_agent_mode: true` (sub-agent — orchestrator already validated).*
+
+Complex generation and review commands require strong reasoning.
+Using a smaller model risks missed edge cases, incomplete spec analysis, and architecture violations.
+
+Display and wait for response:
+
+```
+⚙️  MODEL CHECK
+──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+  Recommended  : claude-opus-4 (or latest Opus model)
+  Why needed   : Spec analysis, architecture review, code generation
+                 require deep reasoning. Smaller models miss edge cases.
+
+  To switch in Claude Code:
+    • Settings → Model → select "claude-opus"
+    • or: /model → choose claude-opus
+
+  Running on claude-opus?
+    Y — yes, on claude-opus → proceed
+    S — skip check (I accept lower quality risk with current model)
+──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+```
+
+- "Y" → proceed to Step 1.
+- "S" → proceed to Step 1 (user accepts risk, add ⚠️ to final report).
+- "N" or anything else → **STOP.** Output: "Please switch to claude-opus, then re-run this command."
+
+## Step 1 — Resolve Target File
+
+1. If `$ARGUMENTS` is provided and points to an existing file → use it directly as the target.
+2. If `$ARGUMENTS` is a **bare UC-ID / ticket ID / partial name** (no path) → resolve it to a file by globbing the feature-package layout. The `{prd-slug}` is **not known yet**, so use a `*` wildcard for that segment, and a recursive `**` under `bdd/` so the platform subfolders (`bdd/web/`, `bdd/app/`, `bdd/system/`) are all covered:
+   - **BDD commands** (target is a `.feature`): `{specs_dir}/{domain}/*/bdd/**/{UC-ID}*.feature` — or `{specs_dir}/*/*/bdd/**/{UC-ID}*.feature` if the domain is also unknown. If a platform/scope is implied by the command (e.g. a system tech-doc needs the `system/` BDD), prefer the match under that platform subfolder.
+   - **PRD commands** (target is `prd.md`): `{specs_dir}/{domain}/*/prd.md` (match the feature folder whose id corresponds), else `{specs_dir}/*/*/prd.md`.
+   - **tech-docs commands**: `{specs_dir}/{domain}/*/tech-docs/{UC-ID}*-tech-design*.md`.
+   - **design-spec commands**: `{specs_dir}/{domain}/*/design-spec/{TICKET-ID}*.md`.
+
+   Once a file matches: set it as the target **and** record `domain` + `prd_slug` from its path (per the extraction rule in `context-loader.md` Step 1 — `prd_slug` = first segment after `{specs_dir}/{domain}/`). Every path the command later reads or writes (sibling BDD/tech-docs/design-spec/trace) uses **that resolved `prd_slug`**, so all artifacts stay in one feature package. If several files match (e.g. multiple platforms), pick per the command's platform/scope or list them and ask.
+3. If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty or no match found:
+   - List files in the relevant directory for this command (e.g., `specs/*/*/prd.md` for PRD commands, `specs/*/*/bdd/**/*.feature` for BDD commands).
+   - Present the list to the user and ask: "Which file do you want to work with? (Enter number or filename)"
+   - Wait for user selection before continuing.
+
+## Step 2 — Execute Context Loader
+
+Load all project context by following the procedure in `steps/context-loader.md`.
+Store all loaded context in memory for use throughout this command session.
+
+## Step 3 — CHECKPOINT
+
+After completing Steps 1 and 2, display a summary and wait for confirmation:
+
+```
+CHECKPOINT
+-----------
+Target     : {resolved file path}
+Project    : {project.name from project-context.yaml}
+Tech stack : {language} / {framework}
+Module     : {module if set, else "not configured"}
+Domains    : {comma-separated domain list}
+
+Proceed? (Y/N)
+```
+
+Wait for explicit "Y" or "N" from the user before continuing.
+- "Y" → proceed to the command-specific steps below.
+- "N" → stop and ask what the user wants to change.
+
+
+## Context
+# Context Loader — Load All Project Context
+
+Execute these steps in order. Store everything in memory for the duration of the command session.
+
+**Priority guide (anti-lost-in-middle):**
+- Steps 1–2 are PROJECT-CONFIG — loaded first, resolve all paths and metadata.
+- Step 3 is CRITICAL — architecture + coding standards, the highest-priority facts for generation.
+- Step 4 is SAFETY — data protection rules, enforced silently for the entire session.
+- Steps 5–6 are DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE — terminology and entity definitions.
+- Step 7 is the WORKING MEMORY RECAP — locks critical facts into the top of working memory.
+
+---
+
+## Step 1 — [PROJECT-CONFIG] Load project-context.yaml
+
+Read `.agent/project-context.yaml`. Extract and store:
+
+**Tech Stack:**
+- `tech_stack.language` → active language (e.g., Java 17, TypeScript, C#, Go)
+- `tech_stack.framework` → active framework (e.g., Spring Boot 3.2, Angular 17, .NET 8)
+- `tech_stack.build_tool` → build tool (e.g., Maven, npm, dotnet, go)
+- `tech_stack.test_framework` → test framework (e.g., JUnit 5 + Mockito, Jest, xUnit)
+- `tech_stack.database` → database (e.g., PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB)
+- `tech_stack.module` → active module profile (e.g., java-spring, angular, dotnet, golang, context-engineering)
+
+**Conventions:**
+- `conventions.build_command` → how to compile/build
+- `conventions.test_command` → how to run tests
+- `conventions.service_run` → how to start the service
+- `conventions.ticket_prefix` → ticket ID prefix (e.g., PROJ, FEAT, UC)
+
+**Domains:**
+- `domains` → list of active business domains
+
+**Paths (if present):**
+- `paths.specs_dir` → spec artifacts root — PRD, BDD, tech-docs, design-spec. Structure: `{specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/{prd.md | bdd/ | tech-docs/ | design-spec/}`
+- `paths.refinement_dir` → findings/review output dir
+- `paths.qc_dir` → QC automation artifacts root (visible top-level, one subfolder per UC: `{qc_dir}/{UC-ID}/`)
+- `paths.qc_skills_dir` → where qc-* commands load QC skills from (default bundled `.agent/skills/qc`; override to the QC team's own repo/submodule so framework upgrade won't overwrite them)
+- `paths.product_definitions_dir` → product definitions root
+- `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → domain knowledge root
+- `paths.business_dictionary` → path to business-dictionary.md
+- `paths.core_entities` → path to core-entities.md
+- `paths.tech_docs_dir` → technical documentation root (merged with specs_dir in feature-package layout — tech-docs live under `{specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/tech-docs/`)
+- `paths.trace_dir` → trace state directory; structure: `.trace/{domain}/{prd-slug}/{UC-ID}.tsv`
+
+If `paths` section is absent, use these defaults:
+- `specs_dir` = `specs`
+- `refinement_dir` = `.agent/review`
+- `qc_dir` = `docs`
+- `qc_skills_dir` = `.agent/skills/qc`
+- `product_definitions_dir` = `specs/product-definition`
+- `domain_knowledge_dir` = `specs/domain-knowledge`
+- `business_dictionary` = `specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
+- `core_entities` = `specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
+- `tech_docs_dir` = `specs`
+- `trace_dir` = `.trace`
+
+Note: In the feature-package layout, `specs_dir` is the unified root. All spec artifact types (PRD, BDD, tech-docs, design-spec) live under `{specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/`. The `prd-slug` is the feature-package folder name, not a separate config variable.
+
+**How to extract `prd_slug` (works for ANY target file, regardless of nesting depth):** given a target path of the form `{specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/...`, take the **first path segment after `{specs_dir}/{domain}/`** — i.e. the `{prd-slug}` position. Do NOT use the file's immediate parent folder, because BDD/tech-docs/design-spec artifacts are nested one or two levels deeper inside the package. Examples:
+- `specs/payment/create-invoice/prd.md` → `prd_slug = create-invoice`
+- `specs/payment/create-invoice/bdd/system/PAY-UC1.feature` → `prd_slug = create-invoice` *(NOT `system`)*
+- `specs/payment/create-invoice/bdd/web/PAY-UC1.feature` → `prd_slug = create-invoice` *(NOT `web`)*
+- `specs/payment/create-invoice/tech-docs/PAY-UC1-tech-design.md` → `prd_slug = create-invoice` *(NOT `tech-docs`)*
+- `specs/payment/create-invoice/design-spec/PAY-design-spec-web.md` → `prd_slug = create-invoice`
+
+All sibling artifacts of one feature (PRD, every platform's BDD, the BE + FE tech-docs, the design-spec, and the trace TSV) therefore resolve to the **same `prd_slug`** — so a synthesized **system** BDD or **system/BE** tech-doc lands in the same `{specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/` package as the web/app artifacts it was derived from.
+
+If `tech_stack.module` is set, also load `.agent/modules/{module}/stack-profile.yaml` if it exists.
+
+---
+
+## Step 1.5 — [SERVICE ROUTING] Resolve service paths (umbrella mode)
+
+*Skip this step entirely if `setup.mode` is not `"umbrella"` and `services` section is absent from project-context.yaml.*
+
+If `services` section is present:
+
+**1. Detect active domain** (in priority order):
+- Read `@trace.domain` from target file frontmatter (if Gate loaded a target file)
+- Extract from target file path: `domain` = the first segment after the `specs_dir` base path; `prd_slug` = the next segment (the feature-package folder). This holds for any target depth — see the `prd_slug` extraction rule in Step 1.  
+  *(e.g., `specs/user/create-account/prd.md` **and** `specs/user/create-account/bdd/system/UC1.feature` both → domain = `user`, prd_slug = `create-account`)*
+- If `$ARGUMENTS` contains a path, extract the domain segment after `specs_dir`
+
+**2. Route to service** — if active domain matches a key in `services`:
+- Override `paths.specs_dir` → `services.{domain}.specs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, ALL BDD (web/app/**system**) is a shared cross-team artifact → leave `specs_dir` for step 4 to route to the spec repo; do NOT pin it per-service here.
+- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `services.{domain}.tech_docs_dir` — **only if `setup.spec_source` is NOT set.** When `spec_source` IS set, the tech-design (API contract) is a cross-team artifact and must live in the shared spec repo (handled in step 4), so leave `tech_docs_dir` for step 4 to route — do NOT pin it per-service here.
+- Store `active_service` = `services.{domain}.path`
+- Store `active_service_module` = `services.{domain}.module`
+- If service has its own `module` → use it as `active_module` (overrides `tech_stack.module`)
+
+**3. Fallback** — if domain not detected or no matching service key:
+- Keep default paths from Step 1
+- Set `active_service = unresolved`
+
+**4. Spec source auto-override** — if `setup.spec_source` is set AND the corresponding path was not already explicitly set in `paths:`:
+- Override `paths.specs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs` — **always when `spec_source` is set.** All spec artifacts (PRD, BDD, tech-docs, design-spec) live under the unified spec root in the shared spec repo using the feature-package layout: `{spec_source}/specs/{domain}/{prd-slug}/`. Every umbrella (FE/App/BE) reads from here. *(Per-service `specs/` only when there is no `spec_source`.)*
+- Override `paths.tech_docs_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs` — **always when `spec_source` is set** (step 2 no longer pins tech-docs per-service in this case). Tech-docs live at `{spec_source}/specs/{domain}/{prd-slug}/tech-docs/`. The tech-design IS the cross-team API contract: BE authors it here, and FE/App read it from the same spec submodule at `/generate-code --phase=integration`. *(Per-service tech-docs only happen when there is no `spec_source` — a pure multi-service BE repo with no shared spec module.)*
+- Override `paths.domain_knowledge_dir` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge`
+- Override `paths.business_dictionary` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/business-dictionary.md`
+- Override `paths.core_entities` → `{spec_source}/specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`
+- Override `paths.bug_reports_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bug-reports`
+- Override `paths.bdd_proposals_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals`
+- Override `paths.prd_change_requests_dir` → `{spec_source}/feedback/prd-change-requests`
+- Override `paths.trace_dir` → `{spec_source}/.trace` — **always when `spec_source` is set.** Trace TSVs are consolidated in the spec repo (single authoritative location, no per-service split) so the PM/PO has one place to manage status. Internal structure: `.trace/{domain}/{prd-slug}/{UC-ID}.tsv`. Code-side commands (`/generate-code`, `/dev-run-test`, `/qc-run-test`) run from `service_root` but **write their trace row into `{spec_source}/.trace/{domain}/{prd-slug}/`** — like they already push `feedback/` there. *(Per-service `.trace` only when there is no `spec_source`.)*
+
+> **Why under `spec_source`:** PRD, BDD, tech-docs, design-spec, domain knowledge, tester feedback, **and the `.trace/` coverage state** are all **cross-team artifacts** — they live in the **shared spec repo** using the feature-package layout so every umbrella (FE/App/BE) and the PM read one source via `/sync`. In the feature-package layout, a single `specs/{domain}/{prd-slug}/` folder groups all artifact types for one PRD, making the spec repo self-contained and navigable by feature. The service submodule holds only **code** (+ build/test tooling). `.trace/` and `feedback/` are the dev/QC **write areas** in the spec repo. In single-service mode (no `spec_source`), everything defaults under the repo root — still one repo.
+
+---
+
+## Step 1.6 — [SERVICE CONVENTIONS] Load service-specific conventions (umbrella mode)
+
+*Skip this step entirely if `active_service` is `"unresolved"` or context is single-service mode.*
+
+When `active_service` has been resolved to a real path in Step 1.5 (e.g., `user-service/`):
+
+**1. Locate service config** — try in priority order:
+- `{active_service}/.agent/project-context.yaml`
+- `{active_service}/project-context.yaml`
+
+**2. If found, override with service-specific values:**
+
+| Variable | Source |
+|----------|--------|
+| `conventions.test_command` | service's `conventions.test_command` |
+| `conventions.build_command` | service's `conventions.build_command` |
+| `paths.trace_dir` | **If `spec_source` is set → keep the Step 4 spec-repo route (`{spec_source}/.trace`); ignore any service-level `trace_dir`.** Only when there is no `spec_source`: `{active_service}/{service paths.trace_dir}` (default `{active_service}/.trace`). |
+| `paths.specs_dir` | **If `spec_source` is set → keep the Step 4 spec-repo route (`{spec_source}/specs`); ignore any service-level `specs_dir`** (all spec artifacts are cross-team, never per-service in this mode). Only when there is no `spec_source`: `{active_service}/{service paths.specs_dir}` if set, else the Step 1.5 override. |
+
+**3. Store** `service_root = {active_service}` as the working directory anchor for all downstream commands:
+- Shell commands (`/dev-run-test`, `/dev-gen-test`) run **from within** `service_root`
+- **Source/test files** are written relative to `service_root`; **trace TSVs** are written to `{paths.trace_dir}` (the spec repo when `spec_source` is set — a cross-repo write, committed/pushed to the spec submodule like `feedback/`).
+
+**4. If service config not found** — keep umbrella defaults, still set `service_root = {active_service}` (path anchor is always needed even without a config override).
+
+---
+
+## Step 2 — [PROJECT-CONFIG] Load module stack profile (conditional)
+
+If `tech_stack.module` is set, read `.agent/modules/{module}/stack-profile.yaml`.
+Merge framework-specific conventions (layer patterns, test patterns, naming rules) into the loaded context.
+If the file does not exist → skip silently.
+
+---
+
+## Step 3 — [CRITICAL] Load CLAUDE.md (layered: root + service overlay)
+
+*This is the highest-priority context — it defines HOW to write code and documents for this project.*
+
+CLAUDE.md is loaded in **two layers** so umbrella-wide rules and service-specific
+architecture/coding standards compose correctly. The agent always sits at the umbrella
+root, but the implementation code lives in a service submodule with its OWN stack,
+architecture, and conventions — so the service's CLAUDE.md must win for code generation.
+
+**Layer 1 — [BASE] Root CLAUDE.md (umbrella-wide).**
+Read `CLAUDE.md` at the repo root. Treat its contents as the **shared baseline** for the
+whole umbrella — git conventions, data-protection posture, cross-cutting rules, and (in
+single-service mode) the project's only architecture + coding standards.
+
+**Layer 2 — [OVERLAY] Service CLAUDE.md (umbrella mode only).**
+*Run only if `service_root` was set in Step 1.6 (i.e. a real service was routed to).*
+Read `{service_root}/CLAUDE.md`. This file defines the architecture + coding standards of
+the **actual stack being implemented** (e.g. `user-service` = java-spring, `web` = nextjs).
+Overlay it on top of Layer 1: **on any conflict, the service value WINS** for architecture,
+coding standards, and error handling. Layer-1 values that the service does not redefine
+(e.g. git conventions, banned patterns shared org-wide) remain in effect.
+
+From the **merged** result, extract and store:
+
+- **§1 Project Overview** → project name, language, framework, build/test commands, domains
+- **§2 Architecture** → layer order (e.g., Controller → Facade → Service → Repository), architectural rules — *service overlay wins*
+- **§3 Coding Standards** → naming conventions (classes, methods), response wrapper type, forbidden patterns — *service overlay wins*
+- **§5 Error Handling** → exception types, HTTP status code mapping, not-found exception class name — *service overlay wins*
+- **§7 Git Conventions** → branch naming pattern, commit message format — *root baseline unless service redefines*
+
+**Resolution rules:**
+- If both layers exist → merge as above; record `claude_md_source = root + {service_root}`.
+- If only the service overlay exists (no root CLAUDE.md) → use the service file alone; `claude_md_source = {service_root}`.
+- If `service_root` is set but `{service_root}/CLAUDE.md` is **missing** → fall back to root CLAUDE.md and flag ⚠️ in the Step 7 recap (the service has no architecture/coding-standards definition — code generation will use umbrella defaults, which may be the wrong stack).
+- If neither exists → note CLAUDE.md as missing and continue with project-context.yaml data only.
+
+---
+
+## Step 4 — [SAFETY] Load Data Protection Rules
+
+Read `.agent/rules/data-protection.md` (or `rules/data-protection.md` from the framework installation).
+
+Store the sensitive file patterns — you must **never** read, write, display, or reference content from files matching those patterns for the entire session.
+
+If neither file exists → apply built-in defaults: never access `.env*`, `*.key`, `*.pem`, `*secret*`, `*password*`, `*credential*`.
+
+---
+
+## Step 5 — [DOMAIN] Load Business Dictionary (conditional)
+
+Check if the business dictionary file exists (use `paths.business_dictionary` resolved in Step 1).
+
+If it exists, read it and extract:
+- **Canonical Terms** → complete list of approved terms and their definitions
+- **Banned Terms** → complete list of banned terms and their canonical replacements
+- **Status / Enum Registry** → allowed enum values per entity
+
+Store the banned terms list for **active enforcement** throughout the command session:
+- When generating any text (PRD, BDD, code comments, tech docs), verify no banned terms appear
+- Replace banned terms with their canonical equivalents automatically
+
+If the file does not exist → skip silently. Do not warn or block.
+
+---
+
+## Step 6 — [DOMAIN] Load Core Entities (conditional)
+
+Check if the core entities file exists at `paths.core_entities` (resolved in Step 1).
+Default path: `specs/domain-knowledge/core-entities.md`.
+
+If it exists, read it and store:
+- **Entity catalog** → for each entity: its name, purpose, owner service, key fields (name + type), business invariants, and relationships
+- **Field name registry** → canonical field names to use in generated code and documents
+- **Relationship map** → how entities relate to each other (1:N, N:N, embedded, etc.)
+
+**How to use this catalog:**
+- When generating code: use the field names, types, and relationships defined here — do NOT infer from existing code
+- When generating PRD/BDD: reference entity names from this catalog for consistency
+- When generating tech-docs: use this catalog as the source-of-truth for entity definitions
+
+If the file does not exist → skip silently.
+
+---
+
+## Step 6.5 — [PLATFORM] Derive active_module and platform_type
+
+Using `tech_stack.module` loaded in Step 1, derive and store two variables for use by all downstream commands:
+
+```
+active_module = tech_stack.module   (e.g. "java-spring", "react", "flutter")
+```
+
+| `platform_type` | Modules |
+|---|---|
+| `backend` | `java-spring`, `golang`, `dotnet`, `php-laravel`, `context-engineering` |
+| `web-frontend` | `react`, `nextjs`, `vue`, `nuxt`, `angular` |
+| `mobile` | `flutter`, `react-native`, `ios-swiftui`, `android-compose` |
+
+If `tech_stack.module` is blank or not recognized → set `platform_type = "unknown"` and flag as ⚠️ in the Step 7 recap.
+
+These two variables (`active_module`, `platform_type`) are the canonical source for all branching logic in commands that need platform-specific behavior (dev-gen-test, debug, fix-bug, dev-smoke-test).
+
+---
+
+## Step 6.7 — [GUARDRAILS] Load Project Lessons (conditional)
+
+*Accumulated mistakes the AI must not repeat in this project. These are added over time via `/learn`
+or accepted during `/review-code`, `/fix-bug`, `/debug`.*
+
+Resolve the lessons file path:
+- Use `paths.lessons_file` if set (may be service-overridden in umbrella mode, Step 1.6)
+- Else default `specs/domain-knowledge/lessons-learned.md`
+- In umbrella/service mode (when `service_root` is set), if `paths.lessons_file` is unset, default to `{service_root}/.agent/project-lessons.md`
+
+If the file exists, read it and store ALL lessons as **ACTIVE GUARDRAILS** for the session:
+- Treat each lesson's **Rule** as a hard constraint — same priority as CLAUDE.md coding standards (Step 3).
+- Before generating or modifying any artifact (PRD, BDD, tech-doc, code, test), check the output against every lesson whose `category` matches the current command AND whose `scope` matches the target (domain / file).
+- If a generated output would violate a lesson → correct it **before** presenting, and note which lesson (`L-NNN`) was applied.
+
+If the file does not exist → skip silently (no lessons captured yet).
+
+---
+
+## Step 7 — [RECAP] Working Memory Recap (anti-lost-in-middle)
+
+After loading all context, synthesize and output a compact summary block.
+This recap ensures the most critical facts are stated at the END of context loading
+(recency effect — freshest in working memory when the task begins).
+
+Output exactly this block:
+```
+[CTX LOADED]
+Stack     : {language} / {framework} / {database}
+Platform  : {active_module} ({platform_type})
+Layers    : {layer order from merged CLAUDE.md §2, e.g., Controller → Facade → Service → Repository}
+CLAUDE.md : {root + {service_root} | {service_root} only | root only | ⚠️ service overlay MISSING — using root | missing}
+Ticket    : {ticket_prefix}-
+Dict      : {loaded — N canonical terms, M banned terms | missing}
+Entities  : {loaded — EntityA, EntityB, EntityC | missing}
+Lessons   : {loaded — N guardrails | none yet}
+Service   : {active_service} ({active_service_module}) | single-service
+Svc Root  : {service_root} — conventions + trace_dir loaded from service config | —
+Status    : {FULL | PARTIAL — missing: CLAUDE.md / business-dict / core-entities | MINIMAL}
+```
+
+If any CRITICAL file is missing (CLAUDE.md), flag it clearly so the user can decide whether to proceed.
+
+---
+
+## Context Load Complete
+
+After completing all steps, you have loaded:
+- Project identity, tech stack, module conventions
+- Architecture rules and layer order  ← **[CRITICAL — hold in working memory]**
+- Coding standards and naming conventions  ← **[CRITICAL — hold in working memory]**
+- Data protection rules (sensitive file patterns to never access)
+- Terminology rules with banned-term list  ← **[DOMAIN — apply to every generated word]**
+- Entity catalog (field names, types, invariants)  ← **[DOMAIN — use for code generation]**
+- All configured paths
+
+Proceed to the next step of the calling command.
+
+
+> **Tester proposals (optional input):** before generating, check `{paths.bdd_proposals_dir}/` (default `{spec_source}/feedback/bdd-proposals/`) for scenarios proposed by testers via `/propose-scenario` that map to this UC's ACs. Incorporate any the PO/Dev has accepted — then the tester's draft is removed/archived from `feedback/`. Skip if the folder is empty.
+
+---
+
+## Repo Mode Detection
+
+After loading context, determine which mode to operate in:
+
+- **Spec repo mode**: `project-context.yaml` has NO `services` section OR `setup.mode: spec`
+- **Umbrella mode**: `project-context.yaml` HAS `services` section AND `setup.mode: umbrella`
+
+→ Spec repo mode → proceed to **Platform Selection** below (skip Service Detection)
+→ Umbrella mode → proceed to **Service Detection** below (skip Platform Selection)
+
+---
+
+## Platform Selection (Spec Repo Mode Only)
+
+*Skip this section if running in umbrella mode.*
+
+Ask the user to select the target platform:
+
+```
+Which platform is this BDD for?
+  1. web    — FE/Web (React, Next.js, Angular, Vue, Nuxt)
+  2. app    — Mobile (Flutter, React Native, iOS, Android)
+  3. system — System/BE BDD (synthesized from existing web + app BDDs)
+```
+
+Wait for user selection. Set `active_platform` = chosen value.
+
+**Output path (spec repo mode):**
+`{paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/{active_platform}/{TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-{slug}.feature`
+
+**Platform vocabulary:**
+
+| Platform | "user action" | "type/input" | "observe" | "navigate" |
+|---|---|---|---|---|
+| web | "clicks" | "types into" / "enters" | "sees" / "the page shows" | "navigates to" / "goes to" |
+| app | "taps" | "enters" / "inputs" | "sees" / "the screen shows" | "navigates to" / "opens" |
+| system | N/A — use business events | — | "the system returns" / "receives response" | — |
+
+---
+
+## System BDD Synthesis (active_platform = system)
+
+*Only applies when platform = system. Skip for web and app.*
+
+### Step S0 — Brownfield Check
+
+Check the source PRD Metadata table for `| **API Source** | existing |`.
+
+**Nếu `API Source: existing`:**
+- API contract đã được PO ghi trong phần "Existing API Contract" của PRD.
+- **Skip Steps S1–S3** — không cần scan FE/App BDD, không cần conflict resolution.
+- Dùng bảng "Existing API Contract" trong PRD làm contract input cho Step S4.
+- Set `# @trace.api_source: existing` trong header của file system BDD được gen.
+
+**Nếu `API Source` không có hoặc không phải `existing`:**
+- Tiếp tục Steps S1–S3 (normal synthesis flow).
+
+---
+
+### Step S1 — Scan available FE/App BDDs
+
+Search for existing BDDs for this TICKET-ID:
+- Web BDDs: `{paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/web/{TICKET-ID}-*.feature`
+- App BDDs: `{paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/app/{TICKET-ID}-*.feature`
+
+Classify the feature:
+
+| Condition | Mode |
+|---|---|
+| Both web + app BDDs found | **Multi-platform** — synthesize from both |
+| Only web BDD found | **Web-only** — synthesize from web |
+| Only app BDD found | **App-only** — synthesize from app |
+| No FE/App BDDs found | **Backend-only** — gen directly from PRD |
+
+---
+
+### Step S2 — Extract expected contracts per platform
+
+For each found BDD file, extract:
+- **Triggers**: what user actions call the backend? (map to logical "request" events)
+- **Expected response data**: what fields/shape does each `Then` clause need from the system?
+- **Error signals**: what error states must the backend signal?
+- **Business rules**: what invariants does each platform assume the system enforces?
+
+---
+
+### Step S3 — Cross-Platform Conflict Check (multi-platform mode only)
+
+*Skip if web-only, app-only, or backend-only.*
+
+Compare the extracted contracts across platforms. Flag a conflict if any of these differ:
+
+| Conflict type | Example |
+|---|---|
+| **Response shape mismatch** | Web expects `{ token, redirect_url }`, App expects `{ token, user_profile }` |
+| **Error semantics mismatch** | Web expects HTTP 423 for lock, App expects custom error code `ACC_LOCKED` |
+| **Business rule contradiction** | Web BDD says "lock after 5 attempts", App BDD says "lock after 3 attempts" |
+| **Data field conflict** | Web expects `expires_in: seconds`, App expects `expires_at: ISO timestamp` |
+
+**If conflicts detected → CHECKPOINT (mandatory, cannot skip):**
+
+```
+⚠️  CROSS-PLATFORM CONTRACT CONFLICT
+──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+Feature : {TICKET-ID} — {UC name}
+
+Conflict 1: Response shape mismatch
+  Web BDD (Then): user sees dashboard → implies { token, redirect_url }
+  App BDD (Then): app navigates to HomeScreen → implies { token, user_profile }
+
+Resolution options:
+  A — Union response
+      BE returns all fields: { token, redirect_url, user_profile }
+      Clients ignore fields they don't use. Simple, slight over-fetch.
+  B — Platform hint in request
+      Client sends X-Platform: web|app in header, BE tailors response.
+      Cleaner responses, more BE logic.
+  C — Separate endpoints
+      POST /auth/login/web  and  POST /auth/login/app
+      Maximum flexibility, more endpoints to maintain.
+  D — Custom: describe your approach
+──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+Choose resolution for each conflict (A/B/C/D):
+```
+
+Wait for PO's resolution per conflict. Record each decision as a `# @system.resolution:` annotation in the generated system BDD file.
+
+**If no conflicts → proceed to Step S4 directly.**
+
+---
+
+### Step S4 — Generate System BDD scenarios
+
+Generate scenarios based on mode and resolved conflicts:
+
+- **Multi-platform**: synthesize from both web + app contracts, applying resolved resolutions
+- **Web-only / App-only**: derive from the single platform's contracts
+- **Backend-only**: derive directly from PRD AC/BR using business event language (not HTTP)
+
+System BDD step vocabulary (always use — regardless of FE/App vocabulary):
+- Triggers: "the system receives {event}" / "a {actor} submits {action}"
+- Assertions: "the system returns {data}" / "the system signals {error}" / "the system stores {state}"
+- Do NOT use UI words (click, tap, see, navigate) in system BDD
+
+**If multi-platform with resolution A (union):**
+- System BDD shows the full response contract: all fields from all platforms
+- Add comment: `# @system.resolution: union — clients receive all fields`
+
+**If resolution B (platform hint):**
+- Write separate `Scenario Outline` using Examples table for `web` vs `app` response variants
+- Add comment: `# @system.resolution: platform-hint — X-Platform header determines response shape`
+
+**If resolution C (separate endpoints):**
+- Write separate Scenarios for each endpoint
+- Note the endpoint split explicitly in the SCOPE section
+
+---
+
+## Service Detection (Umbrella Mode Only)
+
+*Skip this section if running in spec repo mode.*
+
+Read the PRD Metadata table for `| **Service** |` and `| **Module** |` rows.
+
+| Condition | Action |
+|---|---|
+| PRD has `Service` row AND value is not "default" | Use it as `active_service` + `active_module`. Load catalog for that module. |
+| PRD has no `Service` row AND `services` defined in project-context.yaml | Ask: "Which service is this BDD for?" (list services, wait for selection) |
+| Single-service project (no `services` array) | `active_service = "default"`, `active_module = tech_stack.module` |
+
+**Output path (umbrella mode):**
+- `active_service = "default"` → `{paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/{TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-{slug}.feature`
+- `active_service ≠ "default"` → `{paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/{active_service}/{TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-{slug}.feature`
+
+**Platform vocabulary** — adapt BDD step wording based on `active_module`:
+
+| Platform type | Modules | "click" | "type" | "see" | "navigate" |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| Web | react, nextjs, vue, nuxt, angular | "clicks" | "types into" / "enters" | "sees" / "the page shows" | "navigates to" / "goes to" |
+| Mobile | flutter, react-native, ios-swiftui, android-compose | "taps" | "enters" / "inputs" | "sees" / "the screen shows" | "navigates to" / "opens" |
+| Backend / API | java-spring, golang, dotnet, php-laravel | *(no UI steps — use)* "submits a request" / "calls the API" | — | "receives response" / "the system returns" | — |
+
+Apply this vocabulary silently when writing Gherkin steps. Do NOT mix web and mobile terms in the same feature file.
+
+---
+
+## Orchestration Check
+
+*Skip this section if already in sub-agent mode (Step 0 of Gate was triggered).*
+
+After loading context, check if the target PRD is large enough to warrant sub-agents:
+
+1. Count `#### {TICKET-ID}-UC` headings in the PRD → **UC count**.
+2. Count total lines in the PRD → **line count**.
+3. If **UC count > 3** OR **line count > 300**:
+   - Switch to orchestration mode — follow `steps/spawn-agent.md`.
+   - The main session becomes the orchestrator: spawn 1 sub-agent per UC.
+   - Each sub-agent runs `/generate-bdd` with `_agent_mode: true` payload.
+   - Collect results and show merged report.
+   - **Do NOT continue with the steps below.**
+4. If UC count ≤ 3 AND line count ≤ 300 → continue with Version Check below (single-session mode).
+
+---
+
+## Sub-Agent Return Format
+
+*This section applies when running as a sub-agent (Gate Step 0 detected `_agent_mode: true`).*
+
+After generating all `.feature` and `.tsv` files for the assigned UC, return the structured result JSON (as specified in `steps/spawn-agent.md` Step E):
+
+```json
+{ "uc_id": "{TICKET-ID}-UC{N}", "files_created": ["path/to/file1", "path/to/file2"], "status": "success | error", "errors": [] }
+```
+
+---
+
+## Version Check
+
+Before generating, check for existing `.feature` files for this PRD:
+
+1. Resolve the search path based on mode:
+   - **Spec repo mode**: `{paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/{active_platform}/{TICKET-ID}-UC*.feature`
+   - **Umbrella mode**: `{paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/{TICKET-ID}-UC*.feature` (or with `{active_service}/` if multi-service)
+2. Read current PRD `| **Version** |` from metadata (e.g., `1.2`).
+
+**If no existing feature files** → fresh generation, proceed normally. Use PRD version as `@trace.prd_version`.
+
+**If existing feature files found**:
+- Read `# @trace.prd_version:` from the existing feature file header.
+- Compare with current PRD version.
+- If **same** → ask: "BDD already generated from PRD v{version}. Regenerate? (Y/N)"
+- If **different** (PRD was updated):
+  1. Read `## Changelog` from the PRD — extract all rows newer than the existing BDD's `@trace.prd_version`.
+  2. Show CHECKPOINT:
+     ```
+     ⚠️  PRD version drift detected
+     BDD was generated from PRD v{old}
+     PRD is now at v{new}
+
+     Changes since v{old}:
+       {changelog rows}
+
+     Options:
+       Y — update only affected scenarios
+       F — full regeneration of all scenarios
+       N — cancel
+     ```
+  3. Proceed based on user choice.
+
+---
+
+## BDD Writing Rules (R1-R10 — enforce strictly)
+
+| Rule | Name | Requirement |
+|------|------|-------------|
+| R1 | Given/When/Then Semantics | Given=state, When=action, Then=outcome. Every SC needs full G/W/T. |
+| R2 | One Behavior Per Scenario | 1 SC = 1 behavior. Do NOT chain When→Then→When→Then. |
+| R3 | Ubiquitous Language | Do NOT use UI selectors / API names / tech terms in steps. |
+| R4 | Outside-in Naming | SC name describes business outcome. No "click" / "(Case X)" / component names. |
+| R5 | Declarative over Imperative | Describe WHAT (business intent), NOT HOW (UI mechanic). |
+| R6 | Observable Outcomes Only | Then asserts observable outcome. Not UI intermediate state / internal state. |
+| R7 | Key Examples / Concrete | Use concrete values. Not vague "valid data". |
+| R8 | Independence | SC runs independently. Does not depend on state from another SC. |
+| R9 | Test Data Completeness | Data table has enough fields to derive expected Then. |
+| R10 | Scope Boundary Explicit | Cross-UC reference uses navigation wording + Note comment. |
+
+## Project Compliance (fail review if missing — C.1-C.5)
+
+| Check | Rule |
+|-------|------|
+| C.1 Wireframe Coverage | Every component/action in Wireframe has ≥1 SC. |
+| C.2 PRD Traceability | Every AC and every BR (including each logic bullet) maps to ≥1 SC. |
+| C.3 Business Dictionary | Use correct canonical terms from business-dictionary.md. |
+| C.4 Banned Terms | 0 banned terms in file — grep before generating. |
+| C.5 NHÓM Grouping | Feature ≥3 SCs → MUST have NHÓM grouping by business theme. |
+
+---
+
+## NHÓM Grouping Convention (C.5 — mandatory for ≥3 scenarios)
+
+Group by business theme, NOT by happy/negative/edge.
+
+Format header (indent 2 spaces, same level as Background):
+```
+  # ==========================================================
+  # NHÓM N: <Business theme> (<BR refs if applicable>)
+  # ==========================================================
+```
+
+Rules:
+- Number sequentially NHÓM 1 → N. SC IDs sequential across lifecycle (do not reset per NHÓM).
+- Each NHÓM can contain @happy + @edge + @negative of the same theme.
+- SCs in NHÓM do not need to be in ID order (NHÓM 2 can contain SC4, SC8, SC11 if same theme).
+
+Suggested patterns (adjust per UC):
+- `Init / Save success — valid data combinations`
+- `Validation / Block when invalid`
+- `Error handling — API fail / system error`
+- `Cancel changes / Close modal without saving`
+- `Cross-system / Downstream effects`
+- `Idempotency & Concurrency`
+
+---
+
+## UC Decomposition
+
+For each UC in the PRD, present the SC outline **before generating**:
+```
+{TICKET-ID}-UC1: {Use Case Name}
+  NHÓM 1: {Theme} (BR1, BR2)
+    SC1 [@happy]:              {business outcome}
+    SC2 [@happy @alternative]: {variant outcome}
+  NHÓM 2: {Theme} (BR2, BR3)
+    SC3 [@edge]:               {edge case}
+    SC4 [@negative]:           {error handling}
+  ACs covered: AC1, AC2
+  BRs covered: {TICKET-ID}-UC1-BR1, BR2, BR3
+```
+
+CHECKPOINT: "Does this outline look correct? Do you want to add or remove any SCs?" → **Wait for confirm before generating.**
+
+---
+
+## Generate
+
+**Output path by mode:**
+- **Spec repo mode**: `{paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/{active_platform}/{TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-{slug}.feature`
+- **Umbrella mode (single-service)**: `{paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/{TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-{slug}.feature`
+- **Umbrella mode (multi-service)**: `{paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/{active_service}/{TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-{slug}.feature`
+
+For each UC, write to the resolved path above. Use vocabulary for the active platform (from Platform Selection or Service Detection).
+
+```gherkin
+# ============================================================
+# @trace.id: {TICKET-ID}-UC{N}
+# @trace.title: <Feature name>
+# @trace.revision: 1  ← static field; use @trace.bdd_version for version tracking (incremented by /review-context --fix or --resume)
+# @trace.domain: <domain>
+# @trace.platform: {active_platform — web | app | system | (omit in umbrella mode)}
+# @trace.service: {active_service — omit in spec repo mode}
+# @trace.module: {active_module in umbrella mode; "unknown" in spec repo mode}
+# @trace.status: draft
+# @trace.author: AI-generated
+# @trace.created_at: {YYYY-MM-DD}
+# @trace.prd: {TICKET-ID}
+# @trace.prd_version: {read from PRD metadata "| **Version** |"}
+# @trace.bdd_version: {1.0 if fresh generation; increment by 0.1 on re-generation — e.g. 1.0 → 1.1}
+# @trace.business_rules: {TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-BR1, {TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-BR2
+# @trace.dataset: {domain}.testdata.yaml
+# ============================================================
+
+# === CONTEXT ===
+# Actor:     <role performing the action, e.g., Consumer, Staff, System>
+# Screens:   <related screens, e.g., Cart → Confirm Order → Order Detail>
+# Entities:  <business entities, e.g., Order, OrderItem, Consumer>
+# Pre-state: <shared state before entering scenarios>
+
+# === SCOPE ===
+# In:  <what this UC covers>
+# Out: <what is NOT in this UC — link to other UC/feature (R10)>
+
+# === BUSINESS DEFINITION ===
+# Quick reference for terms used in this feature. SoT details: business-dictionary.md
+# <Term 1>: <short definition>
+# <Term 2>: <short definition>
+
+Feature: <Feature name>
+  As a <role>
+  I want to <action>
+  So that <business value>
+
+  Background:
+    Given <shared precondition — use aliases from dataset, not technical IDs>
+
+  # ==========================================================
+  # NHÓM 1: <Business theme> (<BR refs>)
+  # ==========================================================
+
+  # Side-effects: <list brief Then side-effects to verify>
+  # @trace.scenario: {TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-SC1
+  # @trace.sc_version: 1.0
+  # @trace.business_rules: {TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-BR1
+  @happy
+  Scenario: <describe business outcome — use precise verb: create/receive/assign/block>
+    Given <input state — alias from dataset>
+    When <single action>
+    Then <main observable outcome>
+      And <side-effect 1 declared in header>
+
+  # Side-effects: <...>
+  # @trace.scenario: {TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-SC2
+  # @trace.sc_version: 1.0
+  # @trace.business_rules: {TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-BR1
+  @happy @alternative
+  Scenario: <same NHÓM 1 theme but different path — e.g., different enum value>
+    Given <state>
+    When <action>
+    Then <outcome>
+
+  # ==========================================================
+  # NHÓM 2: <Business theme 2> (<BR refs>)
+  # ==========================================================
+
+  # Side-effects: <...>
+  # @trace.scenario: {TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-SC3
+  # @trace.sc_version: 1.0
+  # @trace.business_rules: {TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-BR2
+  @edge
+  Scenario: <boundary / error scenario>
+    Given <state>
+    When <action>
+    Then <expected error handling>
+```
+
+### Coverage Matrix & Pre-merge Checklist *(appended to end of each file)*
+
+```gherkin
+# === PRD COVERAGE (C.1 + C.2) ===
+# AC mapping:
+#   AC1 (...) → SC1, SC2
+#   AC2 (...) → SC3
+# BR mapping (each bullet MUST have ≥1 SC — C.2):
+#   {TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-BR1 (...) → SC1, SC2
+#   {TICKET-ID}-UC{N}-BR2 (...) → SC3
+# Wireframe mapping (every component/action ≥1 SC — C.1):
+#   Screen "<screen name>":
+#     [x] <action 1>  → SC1
+#     [x] <action 2>  → SC2
+#     [ ] <action 3>  → MISSING ← BLOCK MERGE
+
+# === PRE-MERGE CHECKLIST ===
+# - [ ] Every SC has Side-effects + @trace.scenario + @trace.sc_version + @trace.business_rules
+# - [ ] Coverage Matrix: 0 MISSING lines (C.1)
+# - [ ] Every AC/BR maps to ≥1 SC (C.2)
+# - [ ] 0 banned terms (C.4) — grep file before merging
+# - [ ] Feature ≥3 SCs has NHÓM grouping by business theme (C.5)
+# - [ ] If popup/modal: Popup/Modal Lifecycle declared in BUSINESS DEFINITION
+# - [ ] If display logic ≥2 dimensions: Display Logic Matrix in BUSINESS DEFINITION
+```
+
+---
+
+## Write Trace State
+
+After generating all `.feature` files, create or update `{paths.trace_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/{UC-ID}.tsv` for each UC.
+
+> **Umbrella + `spec_source`:** both the `.feature` files **and** the trace `.tsv` write to the **spec repo** (`{spec_source}/specs/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/…` and `{spec_source}/.trace/{domain}/{prd-slug}/…`, resolved by context-loader) — a **single-repo** write, committed/pushed to the spec submodule. (Trace is consolidated in the spec repo so the PM manages all status in one place; code-side commands update it cross-repo later.)
+
+**TSV columns (tab-separated, one header row + one data row per scenario):**
+```
+sc_id\tsc_title\tspec_ver\tgen_ver\timplemented_by\ttest_count\ttest_classes\tdev_selftest\tdev_selftest_at\tqc_status\tqc_run_at\tqc_owner\tqc_blocked_by\tprd_version\tbdd_version\ttech_doc_revision\tfe_tech_doc_revision\tprd_status\tuc_status\tfe_phase\tstatus\tlast_updated
+```
+
+**Rules:**
+- If file does not exist → create with header row + all scenario rows.
+- If file exists (re-generation) → for each SC in the new `.feature`:
+  - SC already in `.tsv` AND `spec_ver` is unchanged → update only: `sc_title`, `prd_version`, `bdd_version`, `prd_status`, `uc_status`, `last_updated`. Leave all other columns unchanged.
+  - SC already in `.tsv` AND `spec_ver` changed (scenario was modified) → update: `sc_title`, `spec_ver`, `prd_version`, `bdd_version`, `prd_status`, `uc_status`, `last_updated` AND set `status = DRIFT` immediately (so the TSV reflects drift without waiting for `/validate-traces`). Leave `gen_ver`, `implemented_by`, `test_count`, `test_classes`, `tech_doc_revision`, `fe_tech_doc_revision` unchanged.
+  - SC is new (added in this re-gen) → append new row with `gen_ver`, `implemented_by`, `test_count`, `test_classes`, `dev_selftest`, `dev_selftest_at`, `qc_status`, `qc_run_at`, `qc_owner`, `qc_blocked_by`, `tech_doc_revision`, `fe_tech_doc_revision` all set to `—`.
+  - SC no longer in `.feature` (removed) → delete its row.
+
+**Values to write for each scenario:**
+
+| Column | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| `sc_id` | `{UC-ID}-SC{N}` |
+| `sc_title` | scenario title text |
+| `spec_ver` | `@trace.sc_version` of this scenario |
+| `gen_ver` | `—` (not yet generated) |
+| `implemented_by` | `—` |
+| `test_count` | `—` |
+| `test_classes` | `—` |
+| `dev_selftest` | `—` (no tests run yet) |
+| `dev_selftest_at` | `—` |
+| `qc_status` | `—` (official QC automation result — set by `/qc-run-test`) |
+| `qc_run_at` | `—` |
+| `qc_owner` | `—` (who a non-passing SC waits on: `dev` / `po` — set by `/qc-run-test` + `/report-bug`) |
+| `qc_blocked_by` | `—` (linked `BUG-{id}` / `GAP-{id}` — set by `/qc-run-test` + `/report-bug`) |
+| `prd_version` | `@trace.prd_version` from `.feature` header |
+| `bdd_version` | `@trace.bdd_version` from `.feature` header |
+| `tech_doc_revision` | `—` (BE API contract revision — set by `/generate-code` + `/review-tech-docs`) |
+| `fe_tech_doc_revision` | `—` (FE client tech-design revision `{UC-ID}-tech-design-{platform}.md` — set by `/generate-code --phase=integration` + `/review-tech-docs` on an FE doc) |
+| `prd_status` | read `\| **Status** \|` from PRD metadata |
+| `uc_status` | `draft` for new UCs; keep existing value for re-gen |
+| `fe_phase` | `—` (set by `/generate-code --phase` when FE implements) |
+| `status` | `UNTRACKED` |
+| `last_updated` | today `YYYY-MM-DD` |
+
+## Refresh Panel Mirror
+# Refresh Living Docs panel mirror *(local, umbrella mode)*
+
+*Skip entirely in single-service mode (no `services` and no `setup.spec_source`) — there
+the repo's own `.trace/` IS the panel location, so nothing to mirror.*
+
+After updating the authoritative TSV(s) at `{paths.trace_dir}`:
+
+**When `setup.spec_source` is set (consolidated trace — the common case):**
+`{paths.trace_dir}` resolves to `{spec_source}/.trace` — the single authoritative location.
+This command runs from `service_root`, so the write is **cross-repo into the spec submodule**;
+commit/push the spec submodule for the trace update (same as `feedback/`).
+1. Resolve `panel_mirror = ./.trace` at the **current workspace root**.
+2. If `panel_mirror` resolves to a different path than `{paths.trace_dir}`, copy each
+   just-updated `{UC-ID}.tsv` → `{panel_mirror}/{UC-ID}.tsv` (create the dir; overwrite).
+   No per-service namespacing — there is one trace set; the owning service is carried in each
+   row's `@trace.service`.
+
+**Legacy (no `spec_source` — per-service trace):**
+Copy each just-updated `{UC-ID}.tsv` → `{panel_mirror}/{service-name}/{UC-ID}.tsv`
+(namespaced by `active_service`).
+
+This keeps the open workspace's Living Docs panel current **between syncs** — it is a
+**local convenience mirror only**. The merged `trace-report.json` (canonical, in
+`{spec_source}/.living-docs/`) is rebuilt by `/sync` or `/validate-traces`. For orchestrated
+commands, do this once in the orchestrator after all sub-agents return — not inside each
+sub-agent.
+
+
+## Output
+
+# Report Footer — Standard Command Output Format
+
+Every command report must end with this standard footer section.
+
+## Status Badge
+
+Choose one based on outcome:
+- `✅ Complete` — all steps succeeded, no issues found
+- `❌ Failed` — command could not complete due to a blocking error
+- `⚠️ Warnings` — completed with non-blocking issues that should be reviewed
+
+## Output Artifacts
+
+List every file created or modified by this command:
+```
+Output Artifacts:
+  {created|updated} {file-path} ({brief description})
+  {created|updated} {file-path} ({brief description})
+```
+
+If no files were written (e.g., review or analysis commands) → write `Output Artifacts: none (read-only)`.
+
+## Pipeline Position
+
+Print a one-line map of the pipeline with the CURRENT command's phase marked `◀ bạn ở đây`,
+so the user always sees where this command sits in the end-to-end flow:
+
+```
+Discovery → PRD → [Design Spec] → BDD → Tech Design → Code → Dev Self-Check → QC → Trace Audit
+```
+
+Find the current command in this phase legend and mark **its** phase in the map above:
+
+| Phase | Commands |
+|-------|----------|
+| Discovery | `/define-product` |
+| PRD | `/generate-prd` · `/refine-prd` · `/review-context` (PRD) |
+| Design Spec | `/generate-design-spec` |
+| BDD | `/generate-bdd` · `/review-context` (BDD) |
+| Tech Design | `/generate-tech-docs` · `/map-testids` · `/review-tech-docs` |
+| Code | `/generate-code` · `/review-code` |
+| Dev Self-Check | `/dev-gen-test` · `/dev-run-test` · `/dev-smoke-test` |
+| QC | `/qc-analyze` · `/qc-plan` · `/qc-design-test` · `/qc-review` · `/qc-run-test` · `/qc-report` |
+| Trace Audit | `/validate-traces` |
+
+For a **review command**, also append the 3-step review loop with the current step marked, e.g.:
+`Vòng review: [① phân tích ◀] → ② Review Board → ③ --resume`.
+
+**Cross-cutting commands** (`/sync`, `/update-framework`, `/fix-bug`, `/debug`, `/learn`,
+`/report-bug`, `/propose-scenario`, `/generate-spec-manifest`) sit outside the linear pipeline —
+**omit the Pipeline line entirely** for these (do not force-fit them onto the map).
+
+## Next Command Suggestion
+
+Suggest the logical next command based on workflow phase:
+
+| Current command         | Suggest next                                  |
+|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
+| /setup-ai-first         | `/define-product` to start your first feature |
+| /define-product         | `/generate-prd {product-definition-file}`     |
+| /generate-prd           | `/refine-prd {prd-file}` then `/review-context {prd-file}` |
+| /refine-prd             | Open Review Board → update PRD → `/review-context {prd-file}` |
+| /review-context (PRD)   | FE/App: `/generate-design-spec {prd-file}` (then BDD after sign-off); BE: `/generate-bdd {prd-file}` directly; fix PRD if NEEDS_FIX |
+| /generate-design-spec   | Designer review → Figma links confirmed → PO + Designer sign-off → `/generate-bdd {prd-file}` |
+| /generate-bdd           | `/review-context {feature-file}` to verify coverage |
+| /review-context (BDD)   | `/generate-tech-docs {UC-ID}` if APPROVED; regenerate if NEEDS_FIX |
+| /qc-analyze             | `/qc-plan {UC-ID}` (resolve 🔴 blocker gaps first) |
+| /qc-plan                | `/qc-design-test {UC-ID}`                     |
+| /qc-design-test         | `/qc-review {UC-ID}` (test-case review)       |
+| /qc-review (test-case)  | `/qc-run-test {UC-ID}` if APPROVED; fix TCs if NEEDS_FIX |
+| /qc-run-test            | `/qc-report {UC-ID}` then `/qc-review {UC-ID}` (script review) |
+| /qc-review (script)     | `/qc-report {UC-ID}` then create PR if APPROVED |
+| /qc-report              | `/validate-traces {UC-ID}` to refresh Living Docs (qc_status) |
+| /generate-tech-docs     | `/review-tech-docs {tech-design-file}`        |
+| /review-tech-docs       | `/generate-code {feature-file}` if APPROVED; fix doc if NEEDS_FIX |
+| /generate-code          | First gen → `/review-code {UC-ID}`; re-gen → `/dev-gen-test {UC-ID}` |
+| /dev-gen-test         | `/dev-run-test {UC-ID}`                          |
+| /dev-run-test (passing)    | `/review-code {UC-ID}`                        |
+| /dev-run-test (failing)    | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` or `/debug {error}`    |
+| /review-code            | `/dev-smoke-test {UC-ID}` or create PR            |
+| /dev-smoke-test             | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
+| /validate-traces        | DRIFT/UNTRACKED → `/generate-code {UC-ID}`; GAP → `/dev-gen-test {UC-ID}`; all OK → create PR |
+| /fix-bug                | Create PR and link to ticket                  |
+| /debug                  | `/fix-bug {ticket-id}` if fix needed          |
+| /report-bug             | Send to dev (`/fix-bug {BUG-ID}`); if coverage gap → `/propose-scenario {UC-ID}` |
+| /propose-scenario       | Notify PO/Dev to review the proposal in `feedback/bdd-proposals/` |
+| /learn                  | Continue working — lesson applies on next command |
+| /sync                   | `/validate-traces` for full coverage; act on any `📥 tester feedback` surfaced |
+| /update-framework       | Review `git diff .agent/`, commit; `/sync` for project content |
+
+Format the footer as:
+```
+---
+Status   : {badge}
+{Output Artifacts block}
+Pipeline : Discovery → PRD → [BDD ◀ bạn ở đây] → Tech Design → Code → Dev Self-Check → QC → Trace Audit
+           (review cmd) Vòng review: [① phân tích ◀] → ② Review Board → ③ --resume
+Next     : {suggested command with example arguments}
+```
+*(Omit the `Pipeline` line for cross-cutting commands listed above.)*
+
+
+```
+/generate-bdd Complete
+
+[Spec repo mode — platform: {active_platform}]
+Files:
+  {paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/{active_platform}/{TICKET-ID}-UC1-{slug}.feature ({N} scenarios)
+  {paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/{active_platform}/{TICKET-ID}-UC2-{slug}.feature ({N} scenarios)
+Trace:
+  {paths.trace_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/{TICKET-ID}-UC1.tsv ({N} rows)
+  {paths.trace_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/{TICKET-ID}-UC2.tsv ({N} rows)
+Next (spec repo):
+  → Run /generate-bdd again for other platforms (web → app → system)
+  → After all platforms generated: commit + push + notify dev team
+  → Dev team reads BDD from spec submodule — no /generate-bdd on their side
+
+[Umbrella mode — service: {active_service}]
+Files:
+  {paths.specs_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/bdd/{TICKET-ID}-UC1-{slug}.feature ({N} scenarios)
+Trace:
+  {paths.trace_dir}/{domain}/{prd-slug}/{TICKET-ID}-UC1.tsv ({N} rows)
+Next (umbrella):
+  → /review-context {feature-file} to verify coverage
+  → /generate-tech-docs {feature-file}
+  → /generate-code {feature-file}
+
+📊 Living Docs: run /validate-traces (or /sync) to push this trace to the spec-module dashboard.
+```