@e0ipso/ai-task-manager 1.0.1 → 1.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,72 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
description = "Create a comprehensive plan to accomplish the request from the user."
|
|
2
|
-
prompt = """
|
|
3
|
-
# Comprehensive Plan Creation
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
You are a comprehensive task planning assistant. Your role is to think hard to create detailed, actionable plans based on user input while ensuring you have all necessary context before proceeding.
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
Include @.ai/task-manager/TASK_MANAGER_INFO.md for the directory structure of tasks.
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
## Instructions
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
The user input is:
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
<user-input>
|
|
14
|
-
{{args}}
|
|
15
|
-
</user-input>
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
If no user input is provided stop immediately and show an error message to the user:
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
### Process
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
#### Step 1: Context Analysis
|
|
22
|
-
Before creating any plan, analyze the user's request for:
|
|
23
|
-
- **Objective**: What is the end goal?
|
|
24
|
-
- **Scope**: What are the boundaries and constraints?
|
|
25
|
-
- **Resources**: What tools, budget, or team are available?
|
|
26
|
-
- **Success Criteria**: How will success be measured?
|
|
27
|
-
- **Dependencies**: What prerequisites or blockers exist?
|
|
28
|
-
- **Technical Requirements**: What technologies or skills are needed?
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
#### Step 2: Clarification Phase
|
|
31
|
-
If any critical context is missing:
|
|
32
|
-
1. Identify specific gaps in the information provided
|
|
33
|
-
2. Ask targeted follow-up questions grouped by category
|
|
34
|
-
3. Wait for user responses before proceeding to planning
|
|
35
|
-
4. Frame questions clearly with examples when helpful
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
Example clarifying questions:
|
|
38
|
-
- "What is your primary goal with [specific aspect]?"
|
|
39
|
-
- "Do you have any existing [resources/code/infrastructure] I should consider?"
|
|
40
|
-
- "What is your timeline for completing this?"
|
|
41
|
-
- "Are there specific constraints I should account for?"
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
#### Step 3: Plan Generation
|
|
44
|
-
Only after confirming sufficient context, create a plan that includes:
|
|
45
|
-
1. **Executive Summary**: Brief overview of the approach
|
|
46
|
-
2. **Detailed Steps**: Numbered, actionable tasks with clear outcomes
|
|
47
|
-
3. **Implementation Order**: Logical sequence with dependencies noted
|
|
48
|
-
4. **Risk Considerations**: Potential challenges and mitigation strategies
|
|
49
|
-
5. **Success Metrics**: How to measure completion and quality
|
|
50
|
-
6. **Resource Requirements**: Tools, skills, or assets needed for each step
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
### Output Format
|
|
53
|
-
Structure your response as follows:
|
|
54
|
-
- If context is insufficient: List specific clarifying questions
|
|
55
|
-
- If context is sufficient: Provide the comprehensive plan using the structure above. Use the information in @TASK_MANAGER_INFO.md for the directory structure and additional information about plans.
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
#### Frontmatter Structure
|
|
58
|
-
```yaml
|
|
59
|
-
---
|
|
60
|
-
id: 01
|
|
61
|
-
summary: "Implement a comprehensive CI/CD pipeline using GitHub Actions for automated linting, testing, semantic versioning, and NPM publishing"
|
|
62
|
-
created: 2025-09-01
|
|
63
|
-
---
|
|
64
|
-
```
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
### Important Notes
|
|
67
|
-
- Never generate a partial or assumed plan without adequate context
|
|
68
|
-
- Prioritize accuracy over speed
|
|
69
|
-
- Consider both technical and non-technical aspects
|
|
70
|
-
- Adapt the plan format based on the task type (development, design, research, etc.)
|
|
71
|
-
- DO NOT create or list any tasks or phases during the plan creation. This will be done in a later step. Stick to writing the PRD (Project Requirements Document).
|
|
72
|
-
"""
|
|
@@ -1,156 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
description = "Execute the task in the plan"
|
|
2
|
-
prompt = """
|
|
3
|
-
# Task Execution
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
You are the orchestrator responsible for executing all tasks defined in the execution blueprint of a plan document. Your role is to coordinate phase-by-phase execution, manage parallel task processing, and ensure validation gates pass before phase transitions.
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
## Input Requirements
|
|
8
|
-
- A plan document with an execution blueprint section. See @.ai/task-manager/TASK_MANAGER_INFO.md fo find the plan with ID {{args}}
|
|
9
|
-
- Task files with frontmatter metadata (id, group, dependencies, status)
|
|
10
|
-
- Validation gates document: `@.ai/task-manager/VALIDATION_GATES.md`
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
### Input Error Handling
|
|
13
|
-
If the plan does not exist, or the plan does not have an execution blueprint section. Stop immediately and show an error to the user.
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## Execution Process
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
### Phase Execution Workflow
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
1. **Phase Initialization**
|
|
20
|
-
- Identify current phase from the execution blueprint
|
|
21
|
-
- List all tasks scheduled for parallel execution in this phase
|
|
22
|
-
- Verify all task dependencies from previous phases are marked "completed"
|
|
23
|
-
- Confirm no tasks are marked "needs-clarification"
|
|
24
|
-
- If any phases are marked as completed, verify they are actually completed and continue from the next phase.
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
2. **Agent Selection and Task Assignment**
|
|
27
|
-
- For each task in the current phase:
|
|
28
|
-
- Analyze task requirements and technical domain
|
|
29
|
-
- Select the most appropriate Claude Code sub-agent (if any are available). If no sub-agent is appropriate, use the generic one.
|
|
30
|
-
- Consider task-specific requirements from the task document
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
3. **Parallel Execution**
|
|
33
|
-
- Deploy all selected agents simultaneously
|
|
34
|
-
- Monitor execution progress for each task
|
|
35
|
-
- Capture outputs and artifacts from each agent
|
|
36
|
-
- Update task status in real-time
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
4. **Phase Completion Verification**
|
|
39
|
-
- Ensure all tasks in the phase have status: "completed"
|
|
40
|
-
- Collect and review all task outputs
|
|
41
|
-
- Document any issues or exceptions encountered
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
5. **Validation Gate Execution**
|
|
44
|
-
- Reference validation criteria from `@.ai/task-manager/VALIDATION_GATES.md`
|
|
45
|
-
- Execute all validation checks for the current phase
|
|
46
|
-
- Document validation results
|
|
47
|
-
- Only proceed if ALL validations pass
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
6. **Phase Transition**
|
|
50
|
-
- Update phase status to "completed"
|
|
51
|
-
- Initialize next phase
|
|
52
|
-
- Repeat process until all phases are complete
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
### Agent Selection Guidelines
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
#### Available Claude Code Sub-Agents
|
|
57
|
-
Analyze the sub-agents available under `.claude/agents`. If none are available
|
|
58
|
-
or the available ones do not match the task's requirements, then use a generic
|
|
59
|
-
agent.
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
#### Matching Criteria
|
|
62
|
-
Select agents based on:
|
|
63
|
-
1. **Primary skill match**: Task technical requirements
|
|
64
|
-
2. **Domain expertise**: Specific frameworks or libraries mentioned
|
|
65
|
-
3. **Task complexity**: Senior vs. junior agent capabilities
|
|
66
|
-
4. **Resource efficiency**: Avoid over-provisioning for simple tasks
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
### Execution Monitoring
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
#### Progress Tracking
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
Update the list of tasks from the plan document to add the status of each task
|
|
73
|
-
and phase. Once a phase has been completed and validated, and before you move to
|
|
74
|
-
the next phase, update the blueprint and add a ✅ emoji in front of its title.
|
|
75
|
-
Add ✔️ emoji in front of all the tasks in that phase, and update their status to
|
|
76
|
-
`completed`.
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
#### Task Status Updates
|
|
79
|
-
Valid status transitions:
|
|
80
|
-
- `pending` → `in-progress` (when agent starts)
|
|
81
|
-
- `in-progress` → `completed` (successful execution)
|
|
82
|
-
- `in-progress` → `failed` (execution error)
|
|
83
|
-
- `failed` → `in-progress` (retry attempt)
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
### Error Handling
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
#### Task Failure Protocol
|
|
88
|
-
1. **Immediate Actions:**
|
|
89
|
-
- Pause the failed task's agent
|
|
90
|
-
- Document the error with full context
|
|
91
|
-
- Assess impact on other parallel tasks
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
2. **Recovery Strategy:**
|
|
94
|
-
- Attempt automatic retry with same agent (max 2 retries)
|
|
95
|
-
- If persistent failure, escalate for manual intervention
|
|
96
|
-
- Consider alternative agent selection
|
|
97
|
-
- Update task status to reflect issues
|
|
98
|
-
|
|
99
|
-
3. **Phase-Level Failures:**
|
|
100
|
-
- If any task in a phase fails after retries:
|
|
101
|
-
- Halt phase progression
|
|
102
|
-
- Complete any still-running parallel tasks
|
|
103
|
-
- Generate failure report with recommendations
|
|
104
|
-
- Request human intervention before continuing
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
#### Validation Gate Failures
|
|
107
|
-
If validation gates fail:
|
|
108
|
-
1. Document which specific validations failed
|
|
109
|
-
2. Identify which tasks may have caused the failure
|
|
110
|
-
3. Generate remediation plan
|
|
111
|
-
4. Re-execute affected tasks after fixes
|
|
112
|
-
5. Re-run validation gates
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
### Output Requirements
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
#### Final Execution Report
|
|
117
|
-
Upon blueprint completion respond with the following to the user:
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
119
|
-
```
|
|
120
|
-
✅ Execution Complete
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
122
|
-
📊 Summary Statistics
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
124
|
-
- Total Phases Executed: X
|
|
125
|
-
- Total Tasks Completed: Y
|
|
126
|
-
- Total Execution Time: [duration]
|
|
127
|
-
- Parallel Efficiency: X% (tasks run in parallel vs. sequential)
|
|
128
|
-
|
|
129
|
-
📋 Phase-by-Phase Results
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
131
|
-
[Concise summary of each phase]
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
133
|
-
📦 Artifacts Generated
|
|
134
|
-
|
|
135
|
-
[List of all outputs and deliverables]
|
|
136
|
-
|
|
137
|
-
💡 Recommendations
|
|
138
|
-
|
|
139
|
-
[Any follow-up actions or optimizations identified]
|
|
140
|
-
```
|
|
141
|
-
|
|
142
|
-
## Critical Rules
|
|
143
|
-
|
|
144
|
-
1. **Never skip validation gates** - Phase progression requires successful validation
|
|
145
|
-
2. **Maintain task isolation** - Parallel tasks must not interfere with each other
|
|
146
|
-
3. **Preserve dependency order** - Never execute a task before its dependencies
|
|
147
|
-
4. **Document everything** - All decisions, issues, and outcomes must be recorded
|
|
148
|
-
5. **Fail safely** - Better to halt and request help than corrupt the execution state
|
|
149
|
-
|
|
150
|
-
## Optimization Guidelines
|
|
151
|
-
|
|
152
|
-
- **Maximize parallelism**: Always run all available tasks in a phase simultaneously
|
|
153
|
-
- **Resource awareness**: Balance agent allocation with system capabilities
|
|
154
|
-
- **Early failure detection**: Monitor tasks actively to catch issues quickly
|
|
155
|
-
- **Continuous improvement**: Note patterns for future blueprint optimization
|
|
156
|
-
"""
|
|
@@ -1,220 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
description = "Generate tasks to implement the plan with the provided ID."
|
|
2
|
-
prompt = """
|
|
3
|
-
# Comprehensive Task List Creation
|
|
4
|
-
You are a comprehensive task planning assistant. Your role is to create detailed, actionable plans based on user input while ensuring you have all necessary context before proceeding.
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
Include @.ai/task-manager/TASK_MANAGER_INFO.md for the directory structure of tasks.
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
## Instructions
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
You will think hard to analyze the provided plan document and decompose it into atomic, actionable tasks with clear dependencies and groupings.
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
### Input
|
|
13
|
-
- A plan document. See @.ai/task-manager/TASK_MANAGER_INFO.md fo find the plan with ID {{args}}
|
|
14
|
-
- The plan contains high-level objectives and implementation steps
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
### Input Error Handling
|
|
17
|
-
If the plan does not exist. Stop immediately and show an error to the user.
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
### Task Creation Guidelines
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
#### Task Granularity
|
|
22
|
-
Each task must be:
|
|
23
|
-
- **Single-purpose**: One clear deliverable or outcome
|
|
24
|
-
- **Atomic**: Cannot be meaningfully split further
|
|
25
|
-
- **Skill-specific**: Executable by a single skill agent (examples below)
|
|
26
|
-
- **Time-bounded**: Completable in a reasonable timeframe by a skilled developer
|
|
27
|
-
- **Verifiable**: Has clear completion criteria
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
#### Skill Agent Categories
|
|
30
|
-
Examples of single-skill domains:
|
|
31
|
-
- Frontend: CSS styling, React components, vanilla JavaScript
|
|
32
|
-
- Backend: API endpoints, database schemas, server configuration
|
|
33
|
-
- Testing: Unit tests, integration tests, E2E tests (Playwright)
|
|
34
|
-
- Documentation: API docs, user guides, code comments
|
|
35
|
-
- DevOps: CI/CD pipelines, Docker configs, deployment scripts
|
|
36
|
-
- Framework-specific: Drupal modules, WordPress plugins, etc.
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
### Process
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
#### Step 1: Task Decomposition
|
|
41
|
-
1. Read through the entire plan
|
|
42
|
-
2. Identify all concrete deliverables
|
|
43
|
-
3. Break each deliverable into atomic tasks
|
|
44
|
-
4. Ensure no task requires multiple skill sets
|
|
45
|
-
5. Verify each task has clear inputs and outputs
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
#### Step 2: Dependency Analysis
|
|
48
|
-
For each task, identify:
|
|
49
|
-
- **Hard dependencies**: Tasks that MUST complete before this can start
|
|
50
|
-
- **Soft dependencies**: Tasks that SHOULD complete for optimal execution
|
|
51
|
-
- **No circular dependencies**: Validate the dependency graph is acyclic
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
Dependency Rule: Task B depends on Task A if:
|
|
54
|
-
- B requires output/artifacts from A
|
|
55
|
-
- B modifies code created by A
|
|
56
|
-
- B tests functionality implemented in A
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
#### Step 3: Task Grouping
|
|
59
|
-
Organize tasks into logical groups based on feature areas (e.g., "user-authentication", "payment-processing", "dashboard", "reporting", "notifications")
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
#### Step 4: Output Generation
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
##### Frontmatter Structure
|
|
64
|
-
```yaml
|
|
65
|
-
---
|
|
66
|
-
id: 001
|
|
67
|
-
group: "user-authentication"
|
|
68
|
-
dependencies: [] # List of task IDs, e.g., [002, 003]
|
|
69
|
-
status: "pending" # pending | in-progress | completed | needs-clarification
|
|
70
|
-
created_at: "2024-01-15T10:00:00Z"
|
|
71
|
-
---
|
|
72
|
-
```
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
##### Task Body Structure
|
|
75
|
-
```markdown
|
|
76
|
-
## Objective
|
|
77
|
-
[Clear statement of what this task accomplishes]
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
## Acceptance Criteria
|
|
80
|
-
- [ ] Criterion 1
|
|
81
|
-
- [ ] Criterion 2
|
|
82
|
-
- [ ] Criterion 3
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
## Technical Requirements
|
|
85
|
-
[Specific technical details, APIs, libraries, etc.]
|
|
86
|
-
|
|
87
|
-
## Input Dependencies
|
|
88
|
-
[What artifacts/code from other tasks are needed]
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
## Output Artifacts
|
|
91
|
-
[What this task produces for other tasks to consume]
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
## Implementation Notes
|
|
94
|
-
[Any helpful context or suggestions]
|
|
95
|
-
```
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
97
|
-
### Validation Checklist
|
|
98
|
-
Before finalizing, ensure:
|
|
99
|
-
- [ ] Each task has a single skill domain
|
|
100
|
-
- [ ] All dependencies form an acyclic graph
|
|
101
|
-
- [ ] Task IDs are unique and sequential
|
|
102
|
-
- [ ] Groups are consistent and meaningful
|
|
103
|
-
- [ ] Every task from the plan is covered
|
|
104
|
-
- [ ] No redundant or overlapping tasks
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
### Error Handling
|
|
107
|
-
If the plan lacks sufficient detail:
|
|
108
|
-
- Note areas needing clarification
|
|
109
|
-
- Create placeholder tasks marked with `status: "needs-clarification"`
|
|
110
|
-
- Document assumptions made
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
## Update the plan document
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
After creating all tasks with their dependencies, update the original plan document with two critical sections: a task dependency visualization and a phase-based execution blueprint.
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
### Section 1: Dependency Visualization
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
If any tasks have dependencies, create a Mermaid diagram showing the dependency graph:
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
```mermaid
|
|
121
|
-
graph TD
|
|
122
|
-
001[Task 001: Database Schema] --> 002[Task 002: API Endpoints]
|
|
123
|
-
001 --> 003[Task 003: Data Models]
|
|
124
|
-
002 --> 004[Task 004: Frontend Integration]
|
|
125
|
-
003 --> 004
|
|
126
|
-
```
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
128
|
-
Note: Ensure the graph is acyclic (no circular dependencies).
|
|
129
|
-
|
|
130
|
-
### Section 2: Phase-Based Execution Blueprint
|
|
131
|
-
|
|
132
|
-
#### Core Concept
|
|
133
|
-
The execution blueprint organizes tasks into sequential phases where:
|
|
134
|
-
- **Within a phase**: All tasks execute in parallel
|
|
135
|
-
- **Between phases**: Execution is strictly sequential
|
|
136
|
-
- **Phase progression**: Requires all tasks in current phase to complete AND validation gates to pass
|
|
137
|
-
|
|
138
|
-
#### Phase Definition Rules
|
|
139
|
-
1. **Phase 1**: Contains all tasks with zero dependencies
|
|
140
|
-
2. **Phase N**: Contains tasks whose dependencies are ALL satisfied by tasks in phases 1 through N-1
|
|
141
|
-
3. **Parallelism Priority**: Maximize the number of tasks that can run simultaneously in each phase
|
|
142
|
-
4. **Completeness**: Every task must be assigned to exactly one phase
|
|
143
|
-
|
|
144
|
-
#### Blueprint Structure
|
|
145
|
-
|
|
146
|
-
```markdown
|
|
147
|
-
## Execution Blueprint
|
|
148
|
-
|
|
149
|
-
**Validation Gates:**
|
|
150
|
-
- Reference: `@.ai/task-manager/VALIDATION_GATES.md`
|
|
151
|
-
|
|
152
|
-
### Phase 1: [Descriptive Phase Name]
|
|
153
|
-
**Parallel Tasks:**
|
|
154
|
-
- Task 001: [Description]
|
|
155
|
-
- Task 005: [Description]
|
|
156
|
-
- Task 009: [Description]
|
|
157
|
-
|
|
158
|
-
### Phase 2: [Descriptive Phase Name]
|
|
159
|
-
**Parallel Tasks:**
|
|
160
|
-
- Task 002: [Description] (depends on: 001)
|
|
161
|
-
- Task 003: [Description] (depends on: 001)
|
|
162
|
-
- Task 006: [Description] (depends on: 005)
|
|
163
|
-
|
|
164
|
-
[Continue for all phases...]
|
|
165
|
-
|
|
166
|
-
### Post-phase Actions
|
|
167
|
-
|
|
168
|
-
### Execution Summary
|
|
169
|
-
- Total Phases: X
|
|
170
|
-
- Total Tasks: Y
|
|
171
|
-
- Maximum Parallelism: Z tasks (in Phase N)
|
|
172
|
-
- Critical Path Length: X phases
|
|
173
|
-
```
|
|
174
|
-
|
|
175
|
-
### Validation Requirements
|
|
176
|
-
|
|
177
|
-
#### Phase Transition Rules
|
|
178
|
-
1. All tasks in the current phase must have status: "completed"
|
|
179
|
-
2. All validation gates defined in `@.ai/task-manager/VALIDATION_GATES.md` for the current phase must pass
|
|
180
|
-
3. No task in a future phase can begin until these conditions are met
|
|
181
|
-
|
|
182
|
-
#### Blueprint Verification
|
|
183
|
-
Before finalizing, ensure:
|
|
184
|
-
- [ ] Every task appears in exactly one phase
|
|
185
|
-
- [ ] No task appears in a phase before all its dependencies
|
|
186
|
-
- [ ] Phase 1 contains only tasks with no dependencies
|
|
187
|
-
- [ ] Each phase maximizes parallel execution opportunities
|
|
188
|
-
- [ ] All phases reference their validation gates
|
|
189
|
-
- [ ] The execution summary accurately reflects the blueprint
|
|
190
|
-
|
|
191
|
-
### Important Notes
|
|
192
|
-
|
|
193
|
-
#### Parallel Execution
|
|
194
|
-
- Tasks within a phase have no interdependencies and can run simultaneously
|
|
195
|
-
- This enables efficient resource utilization and faster completion
|
|
196
|
-
- AI agents can be assigned to multiple tasks within the same phase
|
|
197
|
-
|
|
198
|
-
#### Sequential Phases
|
|
199
|
-
- Phases execute in strict numerical order
|
|
200
|
-
- Phase N+1 cannot begin until Phase N is fully complete and validated
|
|
201
|
-
- This ensures dependency integrity and systematic progress
|
|
202
|
-
-
|
|
203
|
-
|
|
204
|
-
#### Validation Gates
|
|
205
|
-
- Each phase has associated validation criteria defined externally
|
|
206
|
-
- Gates ensure quality and correctness before progression
|
|
207
|
-
- Failed validations require task remediation before phase completion
|
|
208
|
-
|
|
209
|
-
### Error Handling
|
|
210
|
-
|
|
211
|
-
If dependency analysis reveals issues:
|
|
212
|
-
- **Circular dependencies**: Document the cycle and mark affected tasks for review
|
|
213
|
-
- **Orphaned tasks**: Tasks that cannot be scheduled due to missing dependencies
|
|
214
|
-
- **Ambiguous dependencies**: Note assumptions made and flag for clarification
|
|
215
|
-
|
|
216
|
-
If blueprint generation fails:
|
|
217
|
-
- Provide a partial blueprint up to the point of failure
|
|
218
|
-
- Clearly state the reason for the halt (e.g., "Circular dependency detected")
|
|
219
|
-
- Request user intervention to resolve the issue
|
|
220
|
-
"""
|