@dzhechkov/p-replicator 1.6.0 → 1.9.0

package/templates/.claude/hooks/check-growth-trace.cjs

@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env node
+'use strict';
+
+/**
+ * check-growth-trace.cjs — did the M5 growth analysis survive into the Specification, or was it
+ * analysed and dropped?
+ *
+ * NOT an event hook. Like `state-update.cjs` and `check-ports.cjs`, it lives here because this
+ * directory already carries plain Node utilities; nothing registers it in settings.json. This is
+ * deliberate and load-bearing: this package's hooks are NON-BLOCKING by contract (pinned by
+ * tests/unit/hooks-project-anchored.test.js, which requires exit 0), so a hook could never refuse
+ * anything — it could only print. Invoke it:
+ *
+ *   node .claude/hooks/check-growth-trace.cjs [path-to-project]
+ *
+ * Exit codes — three, and the third is the point:
+ *   0  every seed row is traced into docs/Specification.md, or rejected on the record
+ *   1  the seed table carries rows and the Specification traces none of them
+ *   2  THE CHECK DID NOT RUN — no brief, no Specification, or a seed table that would not parse
+ *
+ * A checker that answers "clean" when it could not look converts an unknown into a reassurance.
+ * An ABSENT brief means Phase 0 never ran (the --from-docs entry skips it); that is exit 2, never 0
+ * and never 1. "Phase 0 did not run" is not "nothing is missing".
+ */
+
+const fs = require('node:fs');
+const path = require('node:path');
+
+const BRIEF = path.join('docs', 'product-discovery-brief.md');
+const SPEC = path.join('docs', 'Specification.md');
+
+/** The exact token, case-sensitive. Not a title, not a paraphrase — the same definition the
+ *  validator's prose gate uses, so the two cannot disagree about what a mention is. */
+const ID = /\bFR-GROWTH-(\d{3})\b/g;
+
+/** A line that refuses an obligation. Shared by mentioned() and rejected() so the two rules cannot
+ *  disagree about what a refusal looks like. */
+const REJECT_WORD = /(отклон\w*|не берём|не беремся|не берем|rejected|declined|out of scope|вне области)/i;
+
+function say(s) { process.stdout.write(s + '\n'); }
+
+/** Exit 2 with a reason. Never merged with "clean": not-run and not-violated are different facts. */
+function cannotCheck(reason, hint) {
+  say('⚠️  проверка НЕ выполнена: ' + reason);
+  if (hint) say('    ' + hint);
+  process.exit(2);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Read one required file. Asks about the EXACT path — never lists a directory and matches names
+ * against the listing, because a listing answers a different question than "does this file exist"
+ * and the two diverge on case, symlinks and unicode normalisation.
+ */
+function readRequired(root, rel, absentReason, hint) {
+  const abs = path.join(root, rel);
+  let st;
+  try { st = fs.statSync(abs); } catch { cannotCheck(absentReason, hint); }
+  if (!st.isFile()) cannotCheck(rel + ' существует, но это не файл');
+  try { return fs.readFileSync(abs, 'utf-8'); } catch (e) {
+    cannotCheck('не читается ' + rel + ': ' + ((e && e.message) || e));
+  }
+  return '';
+}
+
+/**
+ * The seed rows, as the brief records them.
+ *
+ * A row is a markdown table row whose FIRST cell is an id. The template ships an example row with
+ * a placeholder id inside the module, so a row whose requirement cell is still a bracketed
+ * placeholder is a TEMPLATE row, not a real obligation, and counting it would let an untouched
+ * template look like a filled-in one.
+ */
+function seedRows(brief) {
+  const rows = [];
+  for (const raw of brief.split('\n')) {
+    const line = raw.trim();
+    if (!line.startsWith('|')) continue;
+    const cells = line.split('|').map((c) => c.trim());
+    // cells[0] is '' for a leading pipe; the id lives in cells[1]
+    const m = /^FR-GROWTH-(\d{3})$/.exec(cells[1] || '');
+    if (!m) continue;
+    const requirement = cells[2] || '';
+    const isPlaceholder = /^\[.*\]$/.test(requirement) || requirement === '...' || requirement === '';
+    if (isPlaceholder) continue;
+    const status = (cells[5] || cells[4] || '').toUpperCase();
+    rows.push({ id: cells[1], speculative: status.includes('SPECULATIVE') });
+  }
+  return rows;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Ids the Specification mentions, by the same definition the validator's prose gate uses.
+ *
+ * A REJECTION LINE IS NOT A MENTION. The two rules overlap on exactly the case that matters: a line
+ * reading `FR-GROWTH-001 rejected` contains the exact token, so a naive mention rule reports the
+ * obligation as carried forward — and the reason requirement on the rejection path is never reached.
+ * MEASURED before this fix: that line exited 0. Cross-family review found the reason-check hole; the
+ * hole was one layer deeper, in which of the two rules got to answer first.
+ */
+function mentioned(spec) {
+  const out = new Set();
+  for (const line of spec.split('\n')) {
+    if (REJECT_WORD.test(line)) continue;   // a refusal is decided by rejected(), which wants a reason
+    ID.lastIndex = 0;
+    for (let m = ID.exec(line); m !== null; m = ID.exec(line)) out.add(m[0]);
+  }
+  return out;
+}
+
+/**
+ * A row may also be REJECTED on the record instead of traced — the validator's prose gate says the
+ * same. A rejection is a line naming the id together with a rejection word AND a reason marker,
+ * because "FR-GROWTH-004 не берём" with nothing after it is indistinguishable from forgetting.
+ */
+function rejected(brief, spec, id) {
+  const re = new RegExp('^.*\\b' + id + '\\b.*$', 'gm');
+  for (const hay of [brief, spec]) {
+    for (const line of hay.match(re) || []) {
+      const m = REJECT_WORD.exec(line);
+      if (!m) continue;
+      // The reason must live AFTER the rejection word. Scanning the whole line was a false-clean:
+      // cross-family review found that `FR-GROWTH-001 rejected` passed, because the reason pattern
+      // included a bare hyphen and the IDENTIFIER contains two of them. MEASURED before the fix —
+      // that exact line exited 0. So: look only at the tail, and never at punctuation alone.
+      const tail = line.slice(m.index + m[0].length);
+      // A reason is WORDS, not a dash. A separator may introduce it but can never be it.
+      const hasReason = /[\p{L}\p{N}][\p{L}\p{N}\s]{6,}/u.test(tail.replace(/^[\s:—–-]+/, ''));
+      if (hasReason) return true;
+    }
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+function main() {
+  const root = process.argv[2] || '.';
+  try { if (!fs.statSync(root).isDirectory()) cannotCheck('это не каталог: ' + root); }
+  catch { cannotCheck('путь не существует: ' + root); }
+
+  const brief = readRequired(root, BRIEF,
+    'нет файла ' + BRIEF,
+    'это значит, что Фаза 0 не запускалась (вход --from-docs её пропускает) — а НЕ что требований по росту не нужно');
+
+  const rows = seedRows(brief);
+
+  // A REUSED id makes the brief malformed, and malformed is exit 2 — never a pass. The module's own
+  // rule is that a number is never reused; when it is, two distinct obligations share one token and
+  // a SINGLE mention in the Specification marks BOTH traced. Cross-family review found this, and it
+  // is the recurring shape: coverage counted over usable ITEMS instead of per POSITION.
+  const dupes = [...new Set(rows.map((r) => r.id).filter((id, i, a) => a.indexOf(id) !== i))];
+  if (dupes.length) {
+    cannotCheck('в таблице-семени повторяются идентификаторы: ' + dupes.join(', '),
+      'номер FR-GROWTH-nnn не переиспользуется — пока дубли не разведены, одно упоминание в '
+      + 'Specification.md зачло бы сразу два разных требования');
+  }
+
+  if (!rows.length) {
+    // An empty seed is a legitimate answer ("нет"), but it is not this checker's business: there is
+    // nothing to trace. Saying "clean" here would claim a check that did not happen.
+    cannotCheck('в брифе нет ни одной заполненной строки FR-GROWTH-nnn',
+      'либо M5 не запускался, либо таблица-семя осталась шаблоном — проверять нечего');
+  }
+
+  const spec = readRequired(root, SPEC, 'нет файла ' + SPEC,
+    'без спецификации не с чем сверять — это не «всё прослежено»');
+
+  const seen = mentioned(spec);
+  const missing = rows.filter((r) => !seen.has(r.id) && !rejected(brief, spec, r.id));
+
+  if (missing.length === rows.length) {
+    say('❌ ни одно требование по росту не доехало до ' + SPEC + ':');
+    for (const r of missing) say('   • ' + r.id + (r.speculative ? ' (SPECULATIVE)' : ''));
+    say('   Разбор роста сделан и выброшен — это ровно тот класс потерь, который ловит проверка.');
+    process.exit(1);
+  }
+  if (missing.length) {
+    say('❌ часть требований по росту потеряна (' + missing.length + ' из ' + rows.length + '):');
+    for (const r of missing) say('   • ' + r.id + (r.speculative ? ' (SPECULATIVE)' : ''));
+    say('   Каждое надо либо перенести в ' + SPEC + ', либо отклонить С ПРИЧИНОЙ — молча уронить нельзя.');
+    process.exit(1);
+  }
+  say('✅ все ' + rows.length + ' требований по росту прослежены в ' + SPEC + ' либо отклонены с причиной');
+  say('   Ограничение: это доказывает, что обязательство ДОНЕСЛИ, а не что его построили.');
+  process.exit(0);
+}
+
+try {
+  main();
+} catch (err) {
+  // Even an unexpected failure must not read as "clean".
+  cannotCheck('внутренняя ошибка проверки: ' + String((err && err.message) || err));
+}

package/templates/.claude/hooks/statusline.cjs

@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ function parseExpectedToolkit() {
     commandsExpected: 11,
     agentsExpected: 4,    // pre-shipped only (project agents are extra)
     rulesExpected: 6,     // pre-shipped only (project rules are extra)
-    hooksExpected: 7,     // 4 v1.4.1 hooks + statusline + state-update + check-ports
+    hooksExpected: 9,     // 4 v1.4.1 hooks + statusline + state-update + 3 deliberate checks
   };
 }
 

package/templates/.claude/rules/replicate-pipeline.md

@@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ absent or its prerequisites are unmet, skip the UI-clone step and log a warning.
 When executing skills during the pipeline:
 
 1. Read the skill's `SKILL.md` file from `.claude/skills/[name]/SKILL.md`
-2. When a skill references `/mnt/skills/user/[name]/` — read from `.claude/skills/[name]/` instead
+2. When a skill references `/mnt/skills/user/[name]/` — read from `.claude/skills/[name]/` instead.
+   *(The ten PRE-SHIPPED skills no longer contain such paths — since 1.8.0 they are pre-baked. This
+   rule is for skills you bring yourself.)*
 3. When a skill references `/mnt/user-data/uploads/` — read from `docs/` instead
 4. When a skill outputs to `/output/` — write to `docs/` or project root instead
 5. `goap-research` skill name maps to `goap-research-ed25519` in this repo
@@ -58,6 +60,7 @@ All generated files go directly into the project. Never create a separate output
 
 | Category | Path |
 |----------|------|
+| Product Discovery Brief (Phase 0) | `docs/product-discovery-brief.md` |
 | SPARC documentation | `docs/` |
 | Validation report | `docs/validation-report.md` |
 | BDD scenarios | `docs/test-scenarios.md` |
@@ -154,9 +157,16 @@ are project-agnostic and can be enhanced (read by Phase 3) but never recreated.
 **Rules (6):** `replicate-pipeline`, `skill-interface-protocol`, `git-workflow`,
 `insights-capture`, `feature-lifecycle`, `docker-ports`
 
-**Hooks:** `.claude/settings.json` (SessionStart + Stop) + cross-platform Node
-scripts in `.claude/hooks/` (`session-insights.cjs`, `autocommit-roadmap.cjs`,
-`autocommit-insights.cjs`, `autocommit-plans.cjs`)
+**Hooks (8 files in `.claude/hooks/`, cross-platform Node).** Only four are wired to an
+event in `.claude/settings.json`; the rest are utilities you invoke deliberately, and the
+difference matters — a hook of this package is NON-BLOCKING by contract and can only print.
+
+*Wired to an event:* `session-insights.cjs` (SessionStart) · `autocommit-roadmap.cjs`,
+`autocommit-insights.cjs`, `autocommit-plans.cjs` (Stop)
+
+*Invoked deliberately, wired to nothing:* `statusline.cjs` (a statusLine, not a hook) ·
+`state-update.cjs` (argv utility) · `check-ports.cjs` (docker-ports Правило №0, exits 0/1/2) ·
+`check-growth-trace.cjs` (did the M5 growth seed reach `docs/Specification.md`, exits 0/1/2)
 
 ### Generated by /replicate Phase 3 (project-specific — create new)
 

package/templates/.claude/rules/skill-interface-protocol.md

@@ -39,6 +39,15 @@ view() .claude/skills/[skill-name]/references/[file].md
 
 Skills originating from claude.ai use `/mnt/` paths. Apply these rewrites in order:
 
+> **The ten skills this package ships no longer need this.** Since p-replicator 1.8.0 their paths are
+> pre-baked: `.claude/skills/<name>/` resolves directly, with no rewrite step. The table below stays
+> because a skill YOU bring from claude.ai still needs it — and because the toolkit generator's own
+> output-scanning instructions describe this transform.
+>
+> One case the table cannot express: a skill referenced but NOT installed. Rewriting its path yields
+> a local-looking path that resolves to nothing, which is worse than an obviously foreign one. Declare
+> it OPTIONAL with a fallback (§6) instead.
+
 | Source Pattern | Target Pattern | Notes |
 |----------------|----------------|-------|
 | `/mnt/skills/user/[name]/` | `.claude/skills/[name]/` | Skill root directories |

package/templates/.claude/skills/cc-toolkit-generator-enhanced/modules/03-generate-p0.md

@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ Copy these 6 skills from the user's skill set into `.claude/skills/`:
 |---|-------|-------------|-------------|
 | 11 | sparc-prd-mini | `/mnt/skills/user/sparc-prd-mini/` | `.claude/skills/sparc-prd-mini/` |
 | 12 | explore | `/mnt/skills/user/explore/` | `.claude/skills/explore/` |
-| 13 | goap-research | `/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/` | `.claude/skills/goap-research/` |
+| 13 | goap-research | `/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/` | `.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/` |
 | 14 | problem-solver-enhanced | `/mnt/skills/user/problem-solver-enhanced/` | `.claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/` |
 | 15 | requirements-validator | `/mnt/skills/user/requirements-validator/` | `.claude/skills/requirements-validator/` |
 | 16 | brutal-honesty-review | `/mnt/skills/user/brutal-honesty-review/` | `.claude/skills/brutal-honesty-review/` |
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ After copying, rewrite ALL `view()` paths in `sparc-prd-mini/SKILL.md`:
 External skill paths (3 rewrites):
 ```
 /mnt/skills/user/explore/SKILL.md                    -> .claude/skills/explore/SKILL.md
-/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/SKILL.md               -> .claude/skills/goap-research/SKILL.md
+/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/SKILL.md               -> .claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md
 /mnt/skills/user/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md     -> .claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md
 ```
 
@@ -458,10 +458,12 @@ Lines 951-953: Dependency Version Note -- update paths to .claude/skills/
 
 **Note on `goap-research` name mapping:** The skill name `goap-research` in the
 lifecycle context maps to `goap-research-ed25519` in this repository. Ensure the
-correct directory name is used when copying.
+correct directory name is used when copying — the **Output paths** below therefore name
+`goap-research-ed25519`, not `goap-research`. Until 2026-08-27 they named the short form, which is
+the alias and never a real directory: the list contradicted the note directly above it.
 
 **Output paths:** `.claude/skills/sparc-prd-mini/`, `.claude/skills/explore/`,
-`.claude/skills/goap-research/`, `.claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/`,
+`.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/`, `.claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/`,
 `.claude/skills/requirements-validator/`, `.claude/skills/brutal-honesty-review/`
 
 ---

package/templates/.claude/skills/cc-toolkit-generator-enhanced/modules/08-skill-composition.md

@@ -201,8 +201,8 @@ FOR each copied_file IN target_skill_directory:
 
 ```
 # Before (claude.ai format):
-Read `/mnt/skills/user/explore/SKILL.md` for clarification protocol.
-Scan `/mnt/user-data/uploads/` for documents.
+Read `.claude/skills/explore/SKILL.md` for clarification protocol.
+Scan `docs/` for documents.
 Write output to `/output/validation-report.md`.
 
 # After (Claude Code local format):

package/templates/.claude/skills/cc-toolkit-generator-enhanced/references/templates/feature-lifecycle.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ When generating the toolkit, **copy these skills from the user's skill set** int
 # Source paths (Claude.ai user skills)
 /mnt/skills/user/sparc-prd-mini/          → .claude/skills/sparc-prd-mini/
 /mnt/skills/user/explore/                  → .claude/skills/explore/
-/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/            → .claude/skills/goap-research/
+/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/            → .claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/
 /mnt/skills/user/problem-solver-enhanced/  → .claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/
 /mnt/skills/user/requirements-validator/   → .claude/skills/requirements-validator/
 /mnt/skills/user/brutal-honesty-review/    → .claude/skills/brutal-honesty-review/
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ After copying, rewrite ALL `view()` paths in `sparc-prd-mini/SKILL.md`:
 External skill paths (3):
 ```
 /mnt/skills/user/explore/SKILL.md            → .claude/skills/explore/SKILL.md
-/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/SKILL.md      → .claude/skills/goap-research/SKILL.md
+/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/SKILL.md      → .claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md
 /mnt/skills/user/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md → .claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md
 ```
 

package/templates/.claude/skills/requirements-validator/SKILL.md

@@ -134,6 +134,58 @@ apply additional security validation:
 - Cross-tenant access attempt (if multi-tenant)
 - Rate limiting / brute force scenario (if auth endpoint)
 
+### Growth Traceability (scoring: +5 present / +0 not applicable / -10 applicable but absent)
+
+Phase 0's M5 module analyses how a competitor grows and emits a `Growth Requirements Seed` table of
+`FR-GROWTH-<nnn>` draft obligations into `docs/product-discovery-brief.md`. This criterion asks one
+question: **did those obligations survive into `docs/Specification.md`, or were they analysed and
+dropped?**
+
+**APPLICABILITY — decide this FIRST, and it is not about project type.** The criterion applies when
+**acquisition or adoption is in scope** — the same condition `/replicate` already gates M5 on
+("If acquisition/adoption in scope (incl. B2B)"). Concretely:
+
+| Situation | Applicable? | Score |
+|---|:---:|---|
+| `docs/product-discovery-brief.md` exists and its seed table has ≥1 `FR-GROWTH-nnn` row | YES | +5 traced · -10 not traced |
+| The brief exists and its seed table says `нет` / is empty | no | +0 |
+| No acquisition or adoption objective (internal tool, on-prem, replacement of an existing internal system) | no | +0 |
+| `docs/product-discovery-brief.md` is ABSENT | no | +0 — see below |
+
+**An absent brief is +0, never -10.** Absence means Phase 0 did not run (the `--from-docs` entry
+skips it). Penalising a project for not running an optional phase would send every `--from-docs`
+project into a permanent NEEDS WORK loop, which is the exact trap already closed for the Measurable
+criterion. "Phase 0 did not run" is not "the growth requirements are missing".
+
+**What TRACED means.** For each `FR-GROWTH-nnn` row in the brief, one of two things is true in
+`docs/Specification.md`:
+
+- the id `FR-GROWTH-nnn` appears (case-sensitive, the exact token — not a title, not a paraphrase), **or**
+- the requirement was consciously rejected, and the rejection is written down with its reason.
+
+A silently dropped row is the defect. A row rejected on the record is not.
+
+| Check | Red Flags |
+|-------|-----------|
+| Every non-SPECULATIVE seed row is traced or rejected on the record | ids present in the brief, absent from the Specification, no rejection noted |
+| Rejections carry a reason | "не берём" with no reason — indistinguishable from forgetting |
+| `SPECULATIVE` rows were not promoted silently | a `[H]`-sourced row promoted to a firm requirement with no human decision recorded |
+
+**Scoring Bonus:** +5 if every applicable seed row is traced or rejected on the record, +0 if not
+applicable per the table above, -10 if the seed table carries rows and the Specification traces none
+of them (BLOCKED if the score drops below 50).
+
+**This criterion scores OUTSIDE the 100-point INVEST/SMART table**, exactly like Security. It adds no
+weight to any existing criterion — the weight table and everything derived from it are unchanged.
+
+**Honest limit.** This proves an obligation was CARRIED FORWARD, not that it was built, and not that
+copying the competitor's growth move is lawful. Legality is not assessed anywhere in this pipeline.
+
+**Deterministic counterpart.** `node .claude/hooks/check-growth-trace.cjs .` answers the same
+question mechanically (0 traced · 1 rows present and none traced · 2 the check did not run). This
+section is a prose gate read by a model; the utility is the deterministic one. Run it when the answer
+has to be more than a judgement.
+
 ### BDD Scenario Generation
 
 For each requirement, generate scenarios covering:

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/01-intelligence.md

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 
 ### 🔵 Режим DEEP
 
-> ⚙️ **Перед началом:** `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
+> ⚙️ **Перед началом:** `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
 > Примени GOAP-методологию вместо статического списка.
 
 **Phase 1 — State Assessment:**
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ confidence = base_reliability × recency_factor
 ### 🟣 Режим VERIFIED (Ed25519)
 
 > ⚙️ **Перед началом:** 
-> 1. `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
+> 1. `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
 > 2. Установи зависимости:
 > ```bash
 > python3 -m venv .venv
@@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ confidence = base_reliability × recency_factor
 > 3. Запусти инициализацию:
 > ```python
 > # Скопируй и запусти скрипт из:
-> # /mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/scripts/ed25519_verifier.py
-> # /mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/scripts/goap_planner.py
+> # .claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/scripts/ed25519_verifier.py
+> # .claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/scripts/goap_planner.py
 > ```
 
 **Всё из режима DEEP, плюс:**

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/02-product-customers.md

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 ### 🔵 Режим DEEP
 
 > ⚙️ **Загрузи:**
-> 1. `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)` — адаптивный поиск отзывов
+> 1. `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)` — адаптивный поиск отзывов
 > 2. `view(references/jtbd-canvas.md)` — JTBD framework + примеры
 
 **GOAP State Assessment:**
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ sample_size_factor: 1.0 (≥20 reviews), 0.8 (10-19), 0.5 (<10)
 
 ### 🟣 Режим VERIFIED
 
-> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
+> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
 
 Всё из DEEP, плюс:
 - Каждая цитата клиента получает `source_hash` и, где доступно, provenance signature

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/025-cjm-prototype.md

@@ -99,7 +99,15 @@ why_now: [из M2 Section E — 4 фактора]
 
 ### Step 3: Generate React Prototype
 
-> ⚙️ `view(/mnt/skills/public/frontend-design/SKILL.md)` — для design quality
+> ⚙️ **`frontend-design` — OPTIONAL, ВНЕШНИЙ.** Этот пакет его не отгружает. Пути вида
+> `.claude/skills/frontend-design/` здесь намеренно НЕТ: он выглядел бы рабочим и не резолвился бы,
+> а путь, который врёт, хуже честно чужого.
+>
+> Если навык установлен — читайте его для design quality. **Fallback, если его нет:** стройте
+> прототип по секции ниже, она самодостаточна; в отчёте пометьте, что оценка design quality не
+> проводилась. Молча пропускать нельзя (см. `.claude/rules/skill-interface-protocol.md` §6).
+>
+> Установить: `dz init --select frontend-design`.
 > ⚙️ `view(examples/noom-cjm-example.md)` — few-shot: структура .jsx
 
 **Создай один .jsx файл** со следующей архитектурой:

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/03-market-competition.md

@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@
 ### 🔵 Режим DEEP
 
 > ⚙️ **Загрузи перед началом:**
-> 1. `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)` — для рыночного research
-> 2. `view(/mnt/skills/user/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md)` — Modules 4, 5, 6 — для конкурентного анализа
+> 1. `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)` — для рыночного research
+> 2. `view(.claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md)` — Modules 4, 5, 6 — для конкурентного анализа
 
 #### PHASE A: GOAP Market Research
 
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ Incumbent  │  (-2, +1)    |  (0, +2)       │  Ценовая война
 
 ### 🟣 Режим VERIFIED (Ed25519)
 
-> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
+> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
 
 Всё из режима DEEP, плюс:
 

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/04-business-finance.md

@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@
 ### 🔵 Режим DEEP
 
 > ⚙️ **Загрузи:**
-> 1. `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)` — адаптивный research
-> 2. `view(/mnt/skills/user/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md)` — Modules 1, 6
+> 1. `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)` — адаптивный research
+> 2. `view(.claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md)` — Modules 1, 6
 
 #### PHASE A: GOAP Financial Research
 
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ Physical: "Команда должна быть БОЛЬШОЙ (для скор
 
 ### 🟣 Режим VERIFIED
 
-> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
+> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
 
 Всё из DEEP, плюс:
 - Все benchmark числа получают source_hash; issuer-grade crypto используется только при valid signature under pinned active key