@dzhechkov/keysarium 1.5.1 → 1.5.3

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@dzhechkov/keysarium",
-  "version": "1.5.1",
+  "version": "1.5.3",
   "description": "AI Case Research Toolkit for Claude Code — full 7-phase pipeline with feature-adr, dream cycles, background workers, multi-platform support, reward learning, and Cloud.ru AI Factory mapping (--ai-factory flag)",
   "main": "src/cli.js",
   "bin": {
@@ -50,4 +50,4 @@
   "publishConfig": {
     "access": "public"
   }
-}
+}

package/src/cli.js

@@ -91,8 +91,17 @@ function parseArgs(argv) {
         command = 'version';
         break;
       default:
-        if (!arg.startsWith('-') && command === null) {
+        if (arg.startsWith('-')) {
+          // Reject unknown options loudly — a typo like --dry-rum or --froce must
+          // never silently downgrade behavior (real install instead of dry-run, or
+          // an unguarded destructive command).
+          error(`Unknown option: ${arg}`);
+          process.exit(1);
+        } else if (command === null) {
           command = arg;
+        } else {
+          error(`Unexpected argument: ${arg}`);
+          process.exit(1);
         }
         break;
     }

package/src/commands/init.js

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ const path = require('path');
 const {
   green, yellow, cyan, bold, dim,
   info, success, warn, error: logError, step,
-  copyDirRecursive, fileExists, readJSON,
+  copyDirRecursive, copyDirTracked, fileExists, readJSON,
   ensureDir, getRelativePaths,
   createManifest, writeManifest, getTemplatesDir,
   COMPONENTS, MANIFEST_FILE,
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ function resolveComponents(options) {
  * Copy a single component from templates to the target directory.
  * Returns array of relative file paths that were installed.
  */
-function installComponent(comp, templatesDir, targetDir) {
+function installComponent(comp, templatesDir, targetDir, force) {
   const src = path.join(templatesDir, comp.src);
   const dest = path.join(targetDir, comp.src);
 
@@ -51,13 +51,21 @@ function installComponent(comp, templatesDir, targetDir) {
   }
 
   if (comp.isFile) {
+    if (fileExists(dest) && !force) {
+      // Preserve a user-modified file (e.g. their own CLAUDE.md / settings.json)
+      // when re-installing without --force. It is still manifest-tracked because
+      // it originates from the template.
+      return [comp.src];
+    }
     ensureDir(path.dirname(dest));
     fs.copyFileSync(src, dest);
     return [comp.src];
   }
 
-  copyDirRecursive(src, dest);
-  return getRelativePaths(dest).map((rel) => path.join(comp.src, rel));
+  // Track files via the TEMPLATE source — never a scan of the destination —
+  // so user-created files under dest are neither recorded nor (later) removed.
+  const { copied, skipped } = copyDirTracked(src, dest, force);
+  return [...copied, ...skipped].map((rel) => path.join(comp.src, rel));
 }
 
 // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -118,7 +126,7 @@ async function run(options) {
     const comp = COMPONENTS[key];
     step(i + 1, totalComponents, `Installing ${comp.label}...`);
 
-    const files = installComponent(comp, templatesDir, targetDir);
+    const files = installComponent(comp, templatesDir, targetDir, force);
     installedFiles.push(...files);
   }
 

package/src/commands/update.js

@@ -159,12 +159,16 @@ async function run(options) {
     const comp = COMPONENTS[key];
     if (!comp) continue;
     const destPath = path.join(targetDir, comp.src);
+    const srcPath = path.join(templatesDir, comp.src);
     if (comp.isFile) {
       if (fileExists(destPath)) {
         allFiles.push(comp.src);
       }
     } else if (fileExists(destPath)) {
-      const paths = getRelativePaths(destPath);
+      // Record files from the TEMPLATE source, not a scan of the destination —
+      // otherwise user-created files in dest get adopted into the manifest and
+      // a later `remove` would delete them.
+      const paths = getRelativePaths(fileExists(srcPath) ? srcPath : destPath);
       allFiles.push(...paths.map((rel) => path.join(comp.src, rel)));
     }
   }

package/src/utils.js

@@ -64,6 +64,39 @@ function copyDirRecursive(src, dest) {
   }
 }
 
+/**
+ * Copy from a TEMPLATE source into dest, tracking which files were written.
+ * Walks the SOURCE tree (never the destination), so only template-originated
+ * files are ever recorded — a user-created file in dest with no template
+ * counterpart is never touched and never returned (prevents `remove` from
+ * deleting user data). When `force` is false, a pre-existing destination file
+ * is PRESERVED (skipped) rather than clobbered (protects user-modified files
+ * on a re-install where the manifest was lost).
+ *
+ * @returns {{copied: string[], skipped: string[]}} relative paths (to dest root)
+ */
+function copyDirTracked(src, dest, force, rel = '', acc = { copied: [], skipped: [] }) {
+  const stat = fs.statSync(src);
+  if (stat.isFile()) {
+    if (fileExists(dest) && !force) {
+      acc.skipped.push(rel);
+    } else {
+      ensureDir(path.dirname(dest));
+      fs.copyFileSync(src, dest);
+      acc.copied.push(rel);
+    }
+    return acc;
+  }
+  if (stat.isDirectory()) {
+    ensureDir(dest);
+    for (const entry of fs.readdirSync(src)) {
+      copyDirTracked(path.join(src, entry), path.join(dest, entry), force,
+        rel ? path.join(rel, entry) : entry, acc);
+    }
+  }
+  return acc;
+}
+
 /**
  * Returns true if the path exists (file or directory).
  */
@@ -254,6 +287,7 @@ module.exports = {
 
   // File operations
   copyDirRecursive,
+  copyDirTracked,
   fileExists,
   readJSON,
   writeJSON,

package/templates/.claude/skills/ai-factory-mapper/SKILL.md

@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ description: >
 
 | Когда нужен | Какой скилл вызвать | Как |
 |---|---|---|
-| Задача сформулирована расплывчато | `explore` | `view /mnt/skills/user/explore/SKILL.md` |
-| Нужна first-principles декомпозиция на шаги | `problem-solver-enhanced` | `view /mnt/skills/user/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md` |
-| Нужна верификация новинок каталога / источников | `goap-research-ed25519` | `view /mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md` |
-| Комплексный анализ с checkpoints | `analyst-manual-full` | `view /mnt/skills/user/analyst-manual-full/SKILL.md` |
-| Финальный DOCX-отчёт | `docx` (public) | `view /mnt/skills/public/docx/SKILL.md` |
+| Задача сформулирована расплывчато | `explore` | `view .claude/skills/explore/SKILL.md` |
+| Нужна first-principles декомпозиция на шаги | `problem-solver-enhanced` | `view .claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md` |
+| Нужна верификация новинок каталога / источников | `goap-research-ed25519` | `view .claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md` |
+| Комплексный анализ с checkpoints | `analyst-manual-full` | `view .claude/skills/analyst-manual-full/SKILL.md` |
+| Финальный DOCX-отчёт | `docx` (public, host-provided) | `view /mnt/skills/public/docx/SKILL.md` |
 
 **Правило:** сначала прочитай SKILL.md нужного скилла, потом следуй его инструкциям. Не переписывай его логику в этот SKILL.md.
 
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ ai-factory-mapper/
 1. Есть ли у пользователя конкретный сценарий с описанием цели, пользователя, входа, выхода?
 2. Или это общий запрос «как сделать X на AI Factory»?
 
-Если второе — **прочитай `/mnt/skills/user/explore/SKILL.md` и следуй его инструкциям** для уточнения. Не пытайся угадать.
+Если второе — **прочитай `.claude/skills/explore/SKILL.md` и следуй его инструкциям** для уточнения. Не пытайся угадать.
 
 Если задача ясна (например, даётся список сценариев с описанием, как в примере ниже) — переходи к Phase 1.
 
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ ai-factory-mapper/
 1. **ВСЕГДА** прочитай `references/catalog.md` — это базовый справочник, но он может устареть.
 2. **ВСЕГДА** сделай `web_search` с запросом `Cloud.ru Evolution AI Factory новые сервисы <текущий_год>` и `Cloud.ru новые MCP серверы <текущий_год>`, чтобы проверить свежие анонсы. Каталог обновляется быстро — пропуск этого шага приводит к ложным gap'ам.
 3. Если пользователь явно указал «используй только актуальные данные» или работа критическая (enterprise-продукт, внешний клиент) — вызови `goap-research-ed25519`:
-   - Прочитай `/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md`
+   - Прочитай `.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md`
    - Цель: `goal_type="verified_exploratory"`, тема — «Cloud.ru Evolution AI Factory current services catalog»
 4. Зафиксируй в working memory перечень сервисов на момент анализа (это важно для воспроизводимости оценок).
 
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ ai-factory-mapper/
 
 **Для каждого сценария:**
 
-1. Прочитай `/mnt/skills/user/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md` — это базовая методология декомпозиции. **Применяй модули 1 (First Principles) и 6 (Contradiction Analysis) как минимум.**
+1. Прочитай `.claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md` — это базовая методология декомпозиции. **Применяй модули 1 (First Principles) и 6 (Contradiction Analysis) как минимум.**
 
 2. Открой `references/decomposition-checklist.md` и пройди по каждому из 10 пунктов:
    - Ingest — откуда/в каком формате приходит вход

package/templates/.claude/skills/edu-site-generator/SKILL.md

@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: edu-site-generator
+description: >
+  Generate a complete gamified educational single-page app from documentation or content,
+  optimized for GitHub Pages deployment. Produces a learning site with modules, interactive
+  examples, and progress mechanics. Triggers on "generate edu site from [docs]", "create
+  learning site [topic]", "build educational app [topic]".
+trust_tier: 1
+---
+
 # edu-site-generator — Gamified Educational Site Generator
 
 <!-- Trust Tier: 1 — Structured | Path to Tier 2: Run /bto-test for self-evaluation -->

package/templates/.claude/skills/feature-adr/SKILL.md

@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ npx @dzhechkov/skills-feature-adr init --with-learning --knowledge-extractor
 | Flag | Installs | Purpose |
 |------|----------|---------|
 | (none) | Core skill + command + rules + shard | Feature development pipeline |
-| `--with-learning` | + `lib/memory-protocol.md`, `lib/reward-tracker.md`, `.claude/rules/reward-learning.md` | Pipeline learns from checkpoint feedback |
+| `--with-learning` | + `lib/memory-protocol.md`, `lib/reward-tracker.md`, `.claude/rules/reward-learning.md` | Installs the shared **Keysarium learning layer** (Phases 0-5, `.keysarium/memory/`). The feature-adr pipeline itself does not yet wire `memory_query`/`memory_store` into its Steps 0-9 — this layer applies only if you also run the Keysarium pipeline. |
 | `--knowledge-extractor` | + `.claude/skills/knowledge-extractor/`, `.claude/commands/harvest.md` | Extract reusable patterns after feature completion |
 
 > **Note:** If `@dzhechkov/keysarium` is already installed, these flags are not needed — keysarium includes all learning and extraction capabilities.

package/templates/.claude/skills/feature-adr/modules/00-complexity-router.md

@@ -57,12 +57,16 @@ Load `references/complexity-matrix.md` for the full matrix. Summary:
 | 0 Complexity Router | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
 | 1 Requirements | ✓ light | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
 | 2 Research | - | - | ✓ | ✓ |
-| 3 ADR | - | ✓ (1 ADR) | ✓ (N ADRs) | ✓ (N ADRs) |
+| 3 ADR + Shift-Left | - | ✓ (1 ADR) | ✓ (N ADRs) | ✓ (N ADRs) |
+| 3.5 QCSD Ideation Swarm | - | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
 | 4 DDD | - | - | ✓ | ✓ |
 | 5 Architecture | - | ✓ light | ✓ | ✓ |
 | 6 Implementation Plan | ✓ inline | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
 | 7 Code | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
-| 8 QE | ✓ smoke | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ full |
+| 8 QE + Brutal Honesty | ✓ smoke | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ full |
+| 9 Fleet QE Assessment | - | - | ✓ | ✓ |
+
+> Steps 3.5 (M+) and 9 (L/XL) are mandatory — skipping them is a BLOCK per the shard Anti-Patterns.
 
 ### 5. Calculate Time Budget
 
@@ -92,7 +96,7 @@ Create artifact: `features/<slug>/00_complexity_assessment.md`
 
 ```
 ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-⏸️ STEP 0/8: Complexity Router Complete
+⏸️ STEP 0: Complexity Router Complete
 <promise>FEATURE_ADR_ROUTED</promise>
 Tier: {COMPLEXITY_TIER} | Active Steps: {ACTIVE_STEPS}
 

package/templates/.claude/skills/feature-adr/references/complexity-matrix.md

@@ -79,39 +79,44 @@ Skipped: 2, 3, 4, 5
 ### Tier M (Score 9-13)
 
 ```
-Active:  0 → 1 → 3(1 ADR) → 5(light) → 6 → 7 → 8
-Skipped: 2, 4
+Active:  0 → 1 → 3(1 ADR) → 3.5 → 5(light) → 6 → 7 → 8
+Skipped: 2, 4, 9
 ```
 
 **Step adaptations:**
 - Step 3: Single ADR for the main architectural decision
+- Step 3.5: QCSD ideation swarm — 3 core agents + GO/CONDITIONAL/NO-GO verdict (mandatory for M+ — skipping is a BLOCK)
 - Step 5: Component diagram only, no full C4
 
 ### Tier L (Score 14-19)
 
 ```
-Active:  0 → 1 → [2 ‖ 3] → [4 ‖ 5] → 6 → 7 → 8
-Parallel groups: (2,3) and (4,5)
+Active:  0 → 1 → [2 ‖ 3] → 3.5 → [4 ‖ 5] → 6 → 7 → 8 → 9
+Parallel groups: (2,3) and (4,5); Step 3.5 runs after Step 3, Step 9 after Step 8
 ```
 
 **Step adaptations:**
 - Step 2: Research analogues in codebase and external patterns
 - Step 3: Multiple ADRs for each significant decision
+- Step 3.5: QCSD ideation swarm — 3-9 parallel agents + GO/CONDITIONAL/NO-GO verdict (mandatory for M+ — skipping is a BLOCK)
 - Step 4: Bounded contexts + ubiquitous language
 - Step 5: Full C4 (Context + Container + Component)
 - Step 8: Unit + integration tests + code review
+- Step 9: Fleet QE assessment — 4 parallel agents (traceability ‖ risk ‖ integration ‖ regression) (mandatory for L/XL — skipping is a BLOCK)
 
 ### Tier XL (Score 20-24)
 
 ```
-Active:  0 → 1 → [2 ‖ 3] → [4 ‖ 5] → 6 → 7(parallel) → 8(full)
-Parallel groups: (2,3), (4,5), (7 per module)
+Active:  0 → 1 → [2 ‖ 3] → 3.5 → [4 ‖ 5] → 6 → 7(parallel) → 8(full) → 9
+Parallel groups: (2,3), (4,5 — after 3.5), (7 per module)
 ```
 
 **Step adaptations:**
 - All steps at full depth
+- Step 3.5: QCSD ideation swarm — 3-9 parallel agents + GO/CONDITIONAL/NO-GO verdict (mandatory for M+ — skipping is a BLOCK)
 - Step 7: Multiple parallel agents, one per module/domain
 - Step 8: Full QE — unit + integration + e2e + performance + security review
+- Step 9: Fleet QE assessment — 4 parallel agents (4-7 with `--full-qe-extended`) (mandatory for L/XL — skipping is a BLOCK)
 
 ---
 

package/templates/.claude/skills/presentation-storyteller/SKILL.md

@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ presentation/
 
 | Phase | Skill | Path | Purpose |
 |-------|-------|------|---------|
-| 1. Explore | `explore` | `/mnt/skills/user/explore/SKILL.md` | Уточнение задачи |
-| 2. Research | `goap-research-ed25519` | `/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md` | Верифицированные источники |
+| 1. Explore | `explore` | `.claude/skills/explore/SKILL.md` | Уточнение задачи |
+| 2. Research | `goap-research-ed25519` | `.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md` | Верифицированные источники |
 
 ## Workflow Overview
 
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ presentation/
 
 ## Phase 1: Explore (Presentation Brief)
 
-**Load:** `view("/mnt/skills/user/explore/SKILL.md")`
+**Load:** `view(".claude/skills/explore/SKILL.md")`
 
 **Key Questions for Presentations:**
 
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ presentation/
 
 ## Phase 2: Research (Verified Sources)
 
-**Load:** `view("/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md")`
+**Load:** `view(".claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md")`
 
 **Research Actions for Presentations:**
 

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/SKILL.md

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ SKILL.md (this file — orchestrator)
 | Skill | Modules | Purpose |
 |-------|---------|---------|
 | `explore` | Pre-flight | Clarify vague requests |
-| `goap-research` | M1-M5 (DEEP) | Adaptive research: A* + OODA |
+| `goap-research-ed25519` | M1-M5 (DEEP) | Adaptive research: A* + OODA |
 | `goap-research-ed25519` | M1-M5 (VERIFIED) | + Ed25519 crypto verification |
 | `problem-solver-enhanced` | M3,M4,M5 (DEEP) | Game Theory, TRIZ, 2nd-Order |
 | `frontend-design` | M2.5 (DEEP) | Production-grade CJM prototype design |
@@ -186,12 +186,12 @@ After CHECKPOINT 6:
 
 ```
 M0:   explore
-M1:   goap-research → goap-research-ed25519
-M2:   goap-research + references/jtbd-canvas.md
+M1:   goap-research-ed25519
+M2:   goap-research-ed25519 + references/jtbd-canvas.md
 M2.5: frontend-design + examples/noom-cjm-example.md (GENERATES new .jsx)
-M3:   goap-research + problem-solver-enhanced [GT, TRIZ, 2nd-Order]
-M4:   goap-research + problem-solver-enhanced [FP, TRIZ] + references/industry-benchmarks.md
-M5:   goap-research + problem-solver-enhanced [2nd-Order, TRIZ]
+M3:   goap-research-ed25519 + problem-solver-enhanced [GT, TRIZ, 2nd-Order]
+M4:   goap-research-ed25519 + problem-solver-enhanced [FP, TRIZ] + references/industry-benchmarks.md
+M5:   goap-research-ed25519 + problem-solver-enhanced [2nd-Order, TRIZ]
 M6:   brutal-honesty-review [Bach + Ramsay]
 Post: presentation-storyteller / md2pptx / idea2prd-manual
 ```

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/01-intelligence.md

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 
 ### 🔵 Режим DEEP
 
-> ⚙️ **Перед началом:** `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/SKILL.md)`
+> ⚙️ **Перед началом:** `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
 > Примени GOAP-методологию вместо статического списка.
 
 **Phase 1 — State Assessment:**
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ confidence = base_reliability × recency_factor
 ### 🟣 Режим VERIFIED (Ed25519)
 
 > ⚙️ **Перед началом:** 
-> 1. `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
+> 1. `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
 > 2. Установи зависимости:
 > ```bash
 > pip install cryptography --break-system-packages
@@ -118,8 +118,8 @@ confidence = base_reliability × recency_factor
 > 3. Запусти инициализацию:
 > ```python
 > # Скопируй и запусти скрипт из:
-> # /mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/scripts/ed25519_verifier.py
-> # /mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/scripts/goap_planner.py
+> # .claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/scripts/ed25519_verifier.py
+> # .claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/scripts/goap_planner.py
 > ```
 
 **Всё из режима DEEP, плюс:**
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ Chain integrity: ✅ All N facts signed, 0 breaks
 
 | Скилл | Режим | Как используется |
 |-------|-------|-----------------|
-| `goap-research` | DEEP | GOAP-методология: State → Actions → A* → OODA |
+| `goap-research-ed25519` | DEEP | GOAP-методология: State → Actions → A* → OODA |
 | `goap-research-ed25519` | VERIFIED | + Ed25519 подписи + citation chain + trusted issuers |
 
 **Не используются в Module 1** (но релевантны позже):
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ Chain integrity: ✅ All N facts signed, 0 breaks
 |---------|----|----|--------|
 | Research protocol | Один режим, статический список | Три режима: QUICK/DEEP/VERIFIED | Адаптация под задачу |
 | Confidence Score | X/5 ручной | Формула с base_reliability × recency × verification | Объективная метрика |
-| External skills | Нет | goap-research, goap-research-ed25519 | Reuse проверенных методологий |
+| External skills | Нет | goap-research-ed25519 | Reuse проверенных методологий |
 | Output columns | 3 (Параметр, Значение, Источник) | 4 (+Confidence) | Прозрачность доверия к данным |
 | Verification | "НЕ НАЙДЕНО" | + Verification Ledger, audit trail, chain integrity | Auditability |
 | Checkpoint actions | 4 варианта | 6 вариантов (+переключение режима) | Гибкость mid-flight |

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/02-product-customers.md

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 ### 🔵 Режим DEEP
 
 > ⚙️ **Загрузи:**
-> 1. `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/SKILL.md)` — адаптивный поиск отзывов
+> 1. `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)` — адаптивный поиск отзывов
 > 2. `view(references/jtbd-canvas.md)` — JTBD framework + примеры
 
 **GOAP State Assessment:**
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ sample_size_factor: 1.0 (≥20 reviews), 0.8 (10-19), 0.5 (<10)
 
 ### 🟣 Режим VERIFIED
 
-> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
+> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
 
 Всё из DEEP, плюс:
 - Каждая цитата клиента подписывается с `source_url_hash`
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ sample_size_factor: 1.0 (≥20 reviews), 0.8 (10-19), 0.5 (<10)
 
 | Скилл | Режим | Как используется |
 |-------|-------|-----------------|
-| `goap-research` | DEEP | Адаптивный поиск отзывов: A* по платформам + OODA при пустых results |
+| `goap-research-ed25519` | DEEP | Адаптивный поиск отзывов: A* по платформам + OODA при пустых results |
 | `goap-research-ed25519` | VERIFIED | + верификация существования цитат по URL |
 | `references/jtbd-canvas.md` | ALL | Шаблон JTBD с примерами (Noom) |
 

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/025-cjm-prototype.md

@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ why_now: [из M2 Section E — 4 фактора]
 
 ### Step 3: Generate React Prototype
 
-> ⚙️ `view(/mnt/skills/public/frontend-design/SKILL.md)` — для design quality
+> ⚙️ `view(.claude/skills/frontend-design/SKILL.md)` — для design quality
 > ⚙️ `view(examples/noom-cjm-example.md)` — few-shot: структура .jsx
 
 **Создай один .jsx файл** со следующей архитектурой:

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/03-market-competition.md

@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@
 ### 🔵 Режим DEEP
 
 > ⚙️ **Загрузи перед началом:**
-> 1. `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/SKILL.md)` — для рыночного research
-> 2. `view(/mnt/skills/user/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md)` — Modules 4, 5, 6 — для конкурентного анализа
+> 1. `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)` — для рыночного research
+> 2. `view(.claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md)` — Modules 4, 5, 6 — для конкурентного анализа
 
 #### PHASE A: GOAP Market Research
 
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ Incumbent  │  (-2, +1)    |  (0, +2)       │  Ценовая война
 
 ### 🟣 Режим VERIFIED (Ed25519)
 
-> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
+> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
 
 Всё из режима DEEP, плюс:
 
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ Technical: "Хотим [A], но это ухудшает [B]"
 
 | Скилл | Режим | Как используется | Какие модули скилла |
 |-------|-------|-----------------|-------------------|
-| `goap-research` | DEEP | Адаптивный market research: A* → OODA | Phases 1-4 |
+| `goap-research-ed25519` | DEEP | Адаптивный market research: A* → OODA | Phases 1-4 |
 | `goap-research-ed25519` | VERIFIED | + Ed25519 verification для TAM/SAM числ | Extended Phase 4 |
 | `problem-solver-enhanced` | DEEP | **Module 4:** Game Theory — payoff matrix, Nash equilibrium | PS Module 4 |
 | `problem-solver-enhanced` | DEEP | **Module 5:** Second-Order Thinking — competitive reactions | PS Module 5 |

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/04-business-finance.md

@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@
 ### 🔵 Режим DEEP
 
 > ⚙️ **Загрузи:**
-> 1. `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/SKILL.md)` — адаптивный research
-> 2. `view(/mnt/skills/user/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md)` — Modules 1, 6
+> 1. `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)` — адаптивный research
+> 2. `view(.claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md)` — Modules 1, 6
 
 #### PHASE A: GOAP Financial Research
 
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ Physical: "Команда должна быть БОЛЬШОЙ (для скор
 
 ### 🟣 Режим VERIFIED
 
-> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
+> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
 
 Всё из DEEP, плюс:
 - Все benchmark числа подписываются с source_hash + issuer verification
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ Physical: "Команда должна быть БОЛЬШОЙ (для скор
 
 | Скилл | Режим | Как используется |
 |-------|-------|-----------------|
-| `goap-research` | DEEP | Адаптивный поиск benchmarks + salary data |
+| `goap-research-ed25519` | DEEP | Адаптивный поиск benchmarks + salary data |
 | `goap-research-ed25519` | VERIFIED | Верификация финансовых чисел (threshold 0.95 strict) |
 | `problem-solver-enhanced` M1 | DEEP | First Principles: деконструкция каждого допущения |
 | `problem-solver-enhanced` M6 | DEEP | TRIZ: разрешение pricing / team / CAC противоречий |

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/05-growth-engine.md

@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@
 ### 🔵 Режим DEEP
 
 > ⚙️ **Загрузи:**
-> 1. `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research/SKILL.md)` — адаптивный research
-> 2. `view(/mnt/skills/user/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md)` — Modules 5, 6
+> 1. `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)` — адаптивный research
+> 2. `view(.claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md)` — Modules 5, 6
 
 #### PHASE A: GOAP Growth Research
 
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ Physical: "Продукт должен быть ПРОСТЫМ (для onboardin
 
 ### 🟣 Режим VERIFIED
 
-> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(/mnt/skills/user/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
+> ⚙️ **Дополнительно:** `view(.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md)`
 
 Всё из DEEP, плюс:
 - Traffic estimates, follower counts подписываются
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ Step 5: [Flywheel / Data Moat] ──→ усиливает Step 2-3
 
 | Скилл | Режим | Как используется |
 |-------|-------|-----------------|
-| `goap-research` | DEEP | Адаптивный поиск traffic data, marketing channels |
+| `goap-research-ed25519` | DEEP | Адаптивный поиск traffic data, marketing channels |
 | `goap-research-ed25519` | VERIFIED | Верификация traffic estimates, follower counts |
 | `problem-solver-enhanced` M5 | DEEP | Second-Order Thinking: feedback loops, tipping points, competitive reactions |
 | `problem-solver-enhanced` M6 | DEEP | TRIZ: moat engineering через разрешение growth contradictions |

package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/modules/06-playbook-synthesis.md

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 ### 🔵 Режим DEEP
 
 > ⚙️ **После формирования плана, загрузи:**
-> `view(/mnt/skills/user/brutal-honesty-review/SKILL.md)`
+> `view(.claude/skills/brutal-honesty-review/SKILL.md)`
 > Применяй **Bach Mode (BS-detection)** к финальному playbook.
 
 #### BS-Detection Quality Gate

package/templates/.claude/skills/transcript-site-generator/SKILL.md

@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+---
+name: transcript-site-generator
+description: >
+  Generate a modern, interactive, mobile-friendly, SEO-optimized static website from a
+  transcript or YouTube video link, ready for GitHub Pages deployment with zero build step.
+  Triggers on "generate transcript site from [content]", "create interactive transcript
+  [topic]", "build transcript website from YouTube [url]".
+trust_tier: 2
+---
+
 # transcript-site-generator — Interactive Transcript Site Generator
 
 <!-- Trust Tier: 2 — Validated | BTO Layer 2 Score: 7.82/10 | Promoted: 2026-03-05 -->

package/templates/.claude/commands/bto-benchmark.md

@@ -1,302 +0,0 @@
-# /bto-benchmark — Deterministic Benchmarking of a Skill or Command
-
-## Usage
-```
-/bto-benchmark [path to skill directory or file]
-```
-
-## Parameters
-- $ARGUMENTS — Path to a skill directory (`.claude/skills/<name>/`), a command file (`.claude/commands/<name>.md`), a rule file (`.claude/rules/<name>.md`), or any structured artifact. Optionally include "verbose" to show expanded per-section diagnostics for all layers.
-
-## Protocol
-
-### Step 1: Load Skill and Module
-
-Read `.claude/skills/bto/SKILL.md`
-Read `.claude/skills/bto/modules/benchmark.md`
-Read `.claude/skills/bto/references/golden-samples.md`
-
-### Step 2: Validate Input
-
-If $ARGUMENTS is empty:
-- Ask: "Provide a path to the skill directory or artifact file you want to benchmark."
-- Stop and wait.
-
-Resolve the artifact path from $ARGUMENTS:
-- Strip any trailing slash
-- If the path points to a directory → look for `SKILL.md` inside it as the primary file, but include all files in the directory for context
-- If the path points to a file → use that file directly
-- If the path does not exist → report "Path not found: [path]" and stop
-
-### Step 3: Detect Artifact Type
-
-Auto-detect from path pattern:
-
-| Path Pattern | Detected Type |
-|-------------|--------------|
-| `.claude/skills/*/SKILL.md` or `.claude/skills/*/` | skill |
-| `.claude/commands/*.md` | command |
-| `.claude/rules/*.md` | rule |
-| `.claude/agents/*.md` | agent |
-| `researches/**/*.md` | research artifact |
-
-If type cannot be determined from path → infer from file content structure.
-
-### Step 4: Layer B0 — Golden Sample Comparison (Deterministic)
-
-**Purpose:** Compare artifact structure against the canonical golden sample for its type. Zero LLM cost.
-
-Load golden samples for the detected type from `references/golden-samples.md`.
-
-**Procedure:**
-
-1. Parse the artifact into a section tree (heading hierarchy, section lengths, ordering)
-2. Parse the matching golden sample into the same section tree format
-3. Compare across three structural axes:
-
-**Axis 1 — Section Coverage:**
-For each required section in the golden sample, check if the artifact contains a matching section (by heading text or semantic equivalent).
-- `section_coverage = matched_sections / total_golden_sections`
-
-**Axis 2 — Ordering Score:**
-Compare the ordering of matched sections against the golden sample ordering.
-- Use normalized Kendall tau distance: `ordering_score = 1 - (inversions / max_inversions)`
-- If fewer than 3 matched sections → ordering_score = 1.0 (too few to meaningfully compare)
-
-**Axis 3 — Proportion Score:**
-For each matched section, compute the ratio of artifact section length to golden sample section length.
-- `proportion_score = 1 - mean(|log(artifact_len / golden_len)|)` clamped to [0, 1]
-- Measures whether sections are proportionally sized (not too bloated, not too thin)
-
-**Display per-section MATCH/MISS table:**
-
-```
-Golden Section              Status    Artifact Section             Size Ratio
-─────────────────────────── ──────── ──────────────────────────── ──────────
-## Overview                 MATCH    ## Overview                  1.2x
-## Protocol                 MATCH    ## Protocol                  0.8x
-## Anti-Patterns            MATCH    ## Anti-Patterns             1.0x
-## Dependencies             MISS     —                            —
-## Quick Start              MATCH    ## Quick Start               1.5x
-```
-
-**Golden Similarity Score:**
-```
-B0 = section_coverage * 0.50 + ordering_score * 0.25 + proportion_score * 0.25
-```
-
-**Gate:** If B0 < 0.30 → BLOCK immediately. The artifact's structure is too far from the expected form to benchmark meaningfully.
-
-### Step 5: Layer B1 — Deterministic Test Suite
-
-**Purpose:** Run all applicable deterministic tests for the detected artifact type. Zero LLM cost.
-
-Execute all applicable checks from `benchmark.md` for the detected artifact type. These overlap with but extend the Layer 0 checks from `/bto-test`:
-
-**Universal Checks (U1-U12):**
-- U-01: File exists and is non-empty
-- U-02: UTF-8 encoding valid
-- U-03: Starts with level-1 heading
-- U-04: No placeholder text (`[TODO]`, `[TBD]`, `<INSERT>`, `[PLACEHOLDER]`)
-- U-05: No empty sections (heading with no content before next heading)
-- U-06: Consistent heading hierarchy (no h1→h3 jumps)
-- U-07: No broken internal cross-references
-- U-08: File size within bounds (200B – 100KB per file)
-- U-09: No trailing whitespace on lines
-- U-10: Standard Markdown only (no HTML unless in code blocks)
-- U-11: All code blocks properly closed
-- U-12: No duplicate top-level sections
-
-**Type-Specific Checks:**
-- Skill: SK-01 through SK-16 (SKILL.md exists, required sections, modules/, references/, examples/, etc.)
-- Command: CM-01 through CM-08 (Usage section, Parameters, Protocol steps, Checkpoint, Critical Rules, etc.)
-- Rule: RL-01 through RL-06 (Table format, detection signals, fix actions, no contradictions, etc.)
-- Agent: AG-01 through AG-04 (Model specified, isolation rules, naming convention, output format)
-
-**Display per-test PASS/FAIL table:**
-
-```
-ID      Check                              Result   Note
-─────── ──────────────────────────────────  ──────── ────────────────────────────
-U-01    File exists and is non-empty       PASS     8.4 KB
-U-02    UTF-8 encoding                     PASS
-...
-SK-01   SKILL.md exists at skill root      PASS
-SK-02   Has ## Overview section            PASS
-SK-03   Has ## Anti-Patterns section       FAIL     Section missing
-...
-```
-
-**Test Pass Rate:**
-```
-B1 = passed_tests / total_applicable_tests
-```
-
-**Gate:** If B1 < 0.60 → BLOCK. Too many structural failures to proceed to consistency probing.
-
-### Step 6: Layer B2 — Consistency Probe
-
-**Purpose:** Measure evaluation stability by running identical prompts across multiple agents. Detects artifacts that produce inconsistent interpretations.
-
-**Model:** haiku (cost-optimized)
-
-**Spawn 3 parallel haiku agents with the identical evaluation prompt:**
-
-Each agent receives the exact same prompt:
-```
-You are evaluating a Claude Code artifact for structural quality.
-Rate these 4 dimensions (0.0 to 1.0 each, two decimal places):
-1. STRUCTURE — Does the artifact follow a clear, logical organization?
-2. CLARITY — Are instructions unambiguous and actionable?
-3. COVERAGE — Does it address all aspects implied by its title/scope?
-4. CONSISTENCY — Is the internal terminology and style uniform?
-Output as JSON: {"structure": X.XX, "clarity": X.XX, "coverage": X.XX, "consistency": X.XX}
-```
-
-**Isolation:** Each agent evaluates independently. No cross-communication.
-
-**After all 3 return, compute structural agreement:**
-
-For each dimension:
-```
-agreement[dim] = 1 - (max(scores[dim]) - min(scores[dim]))
-```
-
-**Consistency Score:**
-```
-B2 = mean(agreement across all 4 dimensions)
-```
-
-**Interpretation:**
-- B2 > 0.85 → HIGH consistency — the artifact is unambiguously structured
-- B2 0.60-0.85 → MODERATE consistency — some sections are open to interpretation
-- B2 < 0.60 → LOW consistency — the artifact is structurally ambiguous
-
-**Display per-probe comparison:**
-
-```
-Dimension      Probe 1   Probe 2   Probe 3   Range    Agreement
-──────────── ────────── ────────── ────────── ──────── ──────────
-STRUCTURE      0.80       0.85       0.82      0.05     0.95
-CLARITY        0.70       0.75       0.65      0.10     0.90
-COVERAGE       0.60       0.70       0.55      0.15     0.85
-CONSISTENCY    0.75       0.78       0.73      0.05     0.95
-                                                Mean:    0.91
-```
-
-No gate on B2 — consistency is informational and feeds into the aggregate score.
-
-### Step 7: Layer B3 — Performance Metrics
-
-**Purpose:** Quantify token efficiency and information density. Zero LLM cost.
-
-**Metric 1 — Token Efficiency:**
-```
-token_efficiency = meaningful_content_tokens / total_tokens
-```
-Where `meaningful_content_tokens` excludes: blank lines, decorative separators, repeated boilerplate headers, and excessive whitespace. Target: > 0.70.
-
-**Metric 2 — Information Density:**
-```
-information_density = unique_concepts / total_sections
-```
-Where `unique_concepts` = count of distinct topics, terms, or instructions introduced. Measures whether each section contributes new information vs. repeating prior content. Target: > 2.0 concepts per section.
-
-**Metric 3 — Bloat Detection:**
-Identify sections where:
-- Section length > 3x the golden sample equivalent → BLOATED
-- Section length < 0.2x the golden sample equivalent → THIN
-- Section repeats > 30% of content from another section → REDUNDANT
-
-```
-bloat_score = 1 - (bloated_sections + thin_sections + redundant_sections) / total_sections
-```
-Clamped to [0, 1].
-
-**Performance Score:**
-```
-B3 = token_efficiency * 0.35 + normalize(information_density, 0, 4) * 0.35 + bloat_score * 0.30
-```
-Where `normalize(x, min, max)` clamps and scales x to [0, 1].
-
-**Display per-section metrics:**
-
-```
-Section                    Tokens   Concepts   Golden Ratio   Flag
-─────────────────────────  ──────── ────────── ──────────────  ──────────
-## Overview                 320      4          1.2x           OK
-## Protocol                 1840     12         0.8x           OK
-## Anti-Patterns            580      6          2.8x           BLOATED
-## Quick Start              95       2          0.3x           THIN
-## Dependencies             210      3          1.0x           OK
-```
-
-### Step 8: Aggregate & Gate
-
-**BENCHMARK_SCORE formula:**
-```
-BENCHMARK_SCORE = B0 * 0.30 + B1 * 0.35 + B2 * 0.15 + B3 * 0.20
-```
-
-**Weight rationale:**
-- B0 (Golden Comparison) at 0.30 — structural conformance is the primary benchmark signal
-- B1 (Test Suite) at 0.35 — deterministic correctness is the most reliable signal
-- B2 (Consistency) at 0.15 — stability matters but is a secondary signal
-- B3 (Performance) at 0.20 — efficiency matters for production artifacts
-
-**Gate:**
-- BENCHMARK_SCORE < 0.50 → **BLOCK** — artifact requires significant rework before evaluation
-- BENCHMARK_SCORE 0.50-0.70 → **WARN** — artifact has structural issues; proceed to TEST with caution
-- BENCHMARK_SCORE > 0.70 → **PASS** — artifact meets benchmark standards; ready for TEST
-
-Record `BENCHMARK_SCORE` for downstream consumption by `/bto-test` and `/bto`.
-
----
-
-## Checkpoint
-
-```
-═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-CHECKPOINT: BENCHMARK Complete
-<promise>BTO_BENCHMARKED</promise>
-Artifact: [path]
-Type: [detected type]
-
-Layer B0 (Golden):      X.XX — section coverage, ordering, proportions
-Layer B1 (Test Suite):  X.XX — Y/Z tests passed
-Layer B2 (Consistency): X.XX — agreement across 3 probes
-Layer B3 (Performance): X.XX — token efficiency, density, bloat
-
-BENCHMARK SCORE: X.XX [PASS / WARN / BLOCK]
-
-• "ок" — proceed to TEST
-• "покажи детали [B0/B1/B2/B3]" — expand layer details
-• "пропусти тест" — skip TEST (if PASS)
-═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-```
-
-Wait for user confirmation.
-
----
-
-## Modular Usage
-
-This command is also invoked internally by:
-- `/bto` — as a pre-flight step before TEST phase (if benchmark module is loaded)
-- `/bto-test` — optionally as a prerequisite gate (if user requests `benchmark` flag)
-
-The `BENCHMARK_SCORE` is available to downstream commands:
-- `/bto-test` may use it to calibrate Layer 1 expectations
-- `/bto-optimize` may use it to set a structural baseline floor
-
-## Critical Rules
-
-- Layer B0 and B1 are fully deterministic — no LLM calls, zero cost
-- Layer B2 uses haiku only — NEVER use sonnet or opus for consistency probes
-- Agent tool is REQUIRED for Layer B2 — do not run probes sequentially
-- Golden samples from `references/golden-samples.md` are the authoritative structural reference
-- If golden sample does not exist for the detected type → skip B0, set B0 = 0.50 (neutral), and log a warning
-- Report `BENCHMARK_SCORE` explicitly so downstream commands can consume it
-- BLOCK verdict at B0 or B1 halts the benchmark — do NOT proceed to subsequent layers
-- Layer B3 bloat detection uses golden sample proportions — without a golden sample, use absolute thresholds only
-- If "verbose" is in $ARGUMENTS, show expanded per-section diagnostics for all layers without prompting