@dzhechkov/keysarium 1.0.1 → 1.1.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (29) hide show
  1. package/README.md +21 -5
  2. package/package.json +1 -1
  3. package/templates/.claude/commands/brain-export.md +121 -0
  4. package/templates/.claude/commands/brain-import.md +115 -0
  5. package/templates/.claude/rules/checkpoint-protocol.md +46 -0
  6. package/templates/.claude/rules/feedback-loops.md +113 -0
  7. package/templates/.claude/rules/model-routing.md +65 -0
  8. package/templates/.claude/rules/trust-tiers.md +36 -0
  9. package/templates/.claude/shards/phase-0-discovery.shard.md +45 -0
  10. package/templates/.claude/shards/phase-1-explore.shard.md +32 -0
  11. package/templates/.claude/shards/phase-2-research.shard.md +42 -0
  12. package/templates/.claude/shards/phase-25-cjm.shard.md +47 -0
  13. package/templates/.claude/shards/phase-3-solve.shard.md +47 -0
  14. package/templates/.claude/shards/phase-4-architecture.shard.md +41 -0
  15. package/templates/.claude/shards/phase-5-presentation.shard.md +56 -0
  16. package/templates/.claude/skills/explore/SKILL.md +7 -4
  17. package/templates/.claude/skills/frontend-design/SKILL.md +3 -0
  18. package/templates/.claude/skills/goap-research-ed25519/SKILL.md +3 -0
  19. package/templates/.claude/skills/presentation-storyteller/SKILL.md +5 -2
  20. package/templates/.claude/skills/problem-solver-enhanced/SKILL.md +3 -0
  21. package/templates/.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/SKILL.md +3 -0
  22. package/templates/CLAUDE.md +55 -3
  23. package/templates/docs/improvement-directions.md +641 -0
  24. package/templates/docs/skills-bto/01-deployment-guide.md +33 -33
  25. package/templates/docs/skills-bto/02-admin-guide.md +13 -13
  26. package/templates/docs/skills-bto/03-user-guide.md +1 -1
  27. package/templates/docs/skills-bto/04-infrastructure-requirements.md +4 -4
  28. package/templates/docs/skills-bto/05-architecture.md +4 -4
  29. package/templates/docs/skills-bto/06-user-flows.md +1 -1
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2
2
 
3
3
  **AI Case Research Toolkit for Claude Code**
4
4
 
5
- Full 7-phase pipeline for AI case studies, hackathons, and casariums. Provides skills, commands, rules, agent templates, and hooks for [Claude Code](https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code).
5
+ Full 7-phase pipeline for AI case studies, hackathons, and casariums. Provides skills, commands, rules, shards, agent templates, and brain portability for [Claude Code](https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code).
6
6
 
7
7
  ---
8
8
 
@@ -29,12 +29,12 @@ After installation, open Claude Code in your project directory and start using s
29
29
  | Component | Count | Description |
30
30
  |-----------|-------|-------------|
31
31
  | **Skills** | 6 | `explore`, `frontend-design`, `goap-research`, `presentation-storyteller`, `problem-solver`, `reverse-engineering` |
32
- | **Commands** | 11 | `/casarium`, `/new-research`, `/parallel-research`, `/discovery`, `/explore-case`, `/research`, `/cjm-prototype`, `/solve`, `/architecture-phase`, `/presentation`, `/harvest` |
33
- | **Rules** | 7 | `research-quality`, `checkpoint-protocol`, `agent-swarm`, `domain-specific`, `anti-patterns`, `file-conventions`, `modular-reuse` |
32
+ | **Commands** | 13 | `/casarium`, `/new-research`, `/parallel-research`, `/discovery`, `/explore-case`, `/research`, `/cjm-prototype`, `/solve`, `/architecture-phase`, `/presentation`, `/harvest`, `/brain-export`, `/brain-import` |
33
+ | **Rules** | 10 | `research-quality`, `checkpoint-protocol`, `agent-swarm`, `domain-specific`, `anti-patterns`, `file-conventions`, `modular-reuse`, `feedback-loops`, `model-routing`, `trust-tiers` |
34
+ | **Shards** | 8 | Context shards for each phase: `phase-0-discovery`, `phase-1-explore`, `phase-2-research`, `phase-25-cjm`, `phase-3-solve`, `phase-4-architecture`, `phase-5-presentation`, `bto-evaluation` |
34
35
  | **Agent Templates** | 5 | `discovery-worker`, `research-worker`, `cjm-variant-worker`, `presentation-worker`, `parallel-research-orchestrator` |
35
- | **Hooks** | 3 | PreToolUse validation, PostToolUse notifications, audit logging |
36
36
  | **Library** | 4 | `phase-utils`, `agent-patterns`, `skill-loader`, `domain-templates` |
37
- | **Documentation** | 6 | Deployment, admin, user guide, infrastructure, architecture, flows |
37
+ | **Documentation** | 12 | Deployment, admin, user guide, infrastructure, architecture, flows (for Keysarium and BTO) |
38
38
 
39
39
  Everything is installed into your project's `.claude/` directory and works natively with Claude Code.
40
40
 
@@ -266,6 +266,22 @@ After completing research, extract reusable patterns:
266
266
 
267
267
  The harvester reviews completed projects, identifies universal patterns, decontextualizes them, and updates `TOOLKIT_HARVEST.md`.
268
268
 
269
+ ### Brain Portability
270
+
271
+ Export and import accumulated knowledge between projects:
272
+
273
+ ```bash
274
+ # Export knowledge as a portable JSON container
275
+ /brain-export
276
+
277
+ # Import a brain container into another project
278
+ /brain-import path/to/brain.json
279
+ ```
280
+
281
+ ### Context Shards
282
+
283
+ Shards (`.claude/shards/`) are lightweight context fragments that phases load on demand. They keep the main CLAUDE.md lean while providing phase-specific instructions, semantic completion promises, and quality checklists.
284
+
269
285
  ---
270
286
 
271
287
  ## Requirements
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@dzhechkov/keysarium",
3
- "version": "1.0.1",
3
+ "version": "1.1.0",
4
4
  "description": "AI Case Research Toolkit for Claude Code — full 7-phase pipeline for AI case studies, hackathons, and casariums",
5
5
  "main": "src/cli.js",
6
6
  "bin": {
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ description: "Export accumulated knowledge as a portable brain container (JSON)"
3
+ argument: "optional path to specific research directory, or 'all' for everything"
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Brain Export — Portable Knowledge Container
7
+
8
+ Export accumulated knowledge, patterns, and evaluations into a portable JSON container
9
+ that can be imported into other projects.
10
+
11
+ ## Protocol
12
+
13
+ ### Step 1: Scan Knowledge Sources
14
+
15
+ Scan the following sources for exportable knowledge:
16
+ 1. `TOOLKIT_HARVEST.md` — harvested patterns and learnings
17
+ 2. `researches/*/` — all completed research directories
18
+ 3. `.claude/skills/*/SKILL.md` — skill metadata and trust tiers
19
+ 4. BTO evaluation reports (if any exist in researches)
20
+
21
+ If `$ARGUMENTS` specifies a path, export only from that directory.
22
+ If `$ARGUMENTS` is "all" or empty, export from all sources.
23
+
24
+ ### Step 2: Build Brain Container
25
+
26
+ Construct a JSON structure:
27
+
28
+ ```json
29
+ {
30
+ "version": "1.0",
31
+ "format": "keysarium-brain",
32
+ "exported_at": "[ISO 8601 timestamp]",
33
+ "source_project": "product-keysarium-2026",
34
+ "source_branch": "[current git branch]",
35
+
36
+ "skills": {
37
+ "[skill-name]": {
38
+ "trust_tier": 0-3,
39
+ "trust_tier_label": "Advisory|Structured|Validated|Verified",
40
+ "bto_score": null or float,
41
+ "last_evaluated": null or ISO date
42
+ }
43
+ },
44
+
45
+ "domain_patterns": {
46
+ "[domain]": {
47
+ "rules_applied": ["list of domain rules"],
48
+ "common_pitfalls": ["list"],
49
+ "successful_strategies": ["list"]
50
+ }
51
+ },
52
+
53
+ "research_summaries": [
54
+ {
55
+ "slug": "[case-slug]",
56
+ "domain": "[detected domain]",
57
+ "phases_completed": ["list of completed phases"],
58
+ "key_findings": ["top 3-5 findings"],
59
+ "chosen_cjm_variant": "A|B|C|D or null",
60
+ "presentation_score": null or float
61
+ }
62
+ ],
63
+
64
+ "harvest_patterns": [
65
+ {
66
+ "category": "skills|commands|rules|templates|patterns|snippets",
67
+ "name": "[pattern name]",
68
+ "description": "[what it does]",
69
+ "maturity": "beta|stable",
70
+ "used_in": ["project list"],
71
+ "content_hash": "[SHA-256 of content]"
72
+ }
73
+ ],
74
+
75
+ "pipeline_metrics": {
76
+ "total_cases_processed": 0,
77
+ "avg_phase_times": {},
78
+ "most_common_domain": null,
79
+ "bto_evaluations_run": 0
80
+ },
81
+
82
+ "metadata": {
83
+ "export_scope": "all|[specific path]",
84
+ "files_scanned": 0,
85
+ "patterns_extracted": 0
86
+ }
87
+ }
88
+ ```
89
+
90
+ ### Step 3: Write Export File
91
+
92
+ Write the JSON to: `keysarium-brain-[YYYY-MM-DD].json` in the project root.
93
+
94
+ ### Step 4: Generate Summary
95
+
96
+ Display:
97
+ ```
98
+ ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
99
+ Brain Export Complete
100
+
101
+ File: keysarium-brain-[date].json
102
+ Size: [file size]
103
+ Skills exported: [N] (tiers: [breakdown])
104
+ Research summaries: [N]
105
+ Harvest patterns: [N]
106
+ Domain patterns: [N domains]
107
+
108
+ Import into another project:
109
+ /brain-import keysarium-brain-[date].json
110
+
111
+ • "ок" — done
112
+ • "покажи [section]" — preview section
113
+ ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
114
+ ```
115
+
116
+ ## Modular Reuse
117
+
118
+ This export format is project-agnostic. Any multi-phase pipeline can:
119
+ 1. Define its own brain schema extending the base format
120
+ 2. Export domain-specific patterns
121
+ 3. Import patterns from other pipelines
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ description: "Import a portable brain container into the current project"
3
+ argument: "path to brain JSON file"
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Brain Import — Load External Knowledge
7
+
8
+ Import a previously exported brain container to bootstrap knowledge in a new project.
9
+
10
+ ## Protocol
11
+
12
+ ### Step 1: Validate Brain File
13
+
14
+ 1. Read the JSON file from `$ARGUMENTS`
15
+ 2. Validate format:
16
+ - `version` field exists and is "1.0"
17
+ - `format` field is "keysarium-brain"
18
+ - Required sections present: `skills`, `harvest_patterns`, `metadata`
19
+ 3. If validation fails → show error and stop
20
+
21
+ ### Step 2: Selective Import
22
+
23
+ Ask user what to import:
24
+
25
+ ```
26
+ Brain file: [filename]
27
+ Source project: [source_project]
28
+ Exported: [exported_at]
29
+
30
+ Available sections:
31
+ [1] Skills metadata ([N] skills) — trust tiers and BTO scores
32
+ [2] Domain patterns ([N] domains) — rules, pitfalls, strategies
33
+ [3] Research summaries ([N] cases) — findings and CJM choices
34
+ [4] Harvest patterns ([N] patterns) — reusable patterns and snippets
35
+ [5] Pipeline metrics — timing and performance data
36
+ [A] All sections
37
+
38
+ Which sections to import? (comma-separated numbers or 'A' for all)
39
+ ```
40
+
41
+ ### Step 3: Merge Strategy
42
+
43
+ For each imported section:
44
+
45
+ **Skills metadata:**
46
+ - Update trust_tier in SKILL.md files if imported tier is HIGHER than current
47
+ - Never downgrade a tier
48
+ - Log: "Skill [name]: tier [old] → [new] (from [source_project])"
49
+
50
+ **Domain patterns:**
51
+ - Append to existing domain knowledge (no overwrite)
52
+ - Deduplicate by pattern name
53
+ - Mark imported patterns with source: `[imported from: source_project, date]`
54
+
55
+ **Research summaries:**
56
+ - Store in `TOOLKIT_HARVEST.md` under "## Imported Research Summaries"
57
+ - Read-only reference (don't create research directories)
58
+
59
+ **Harvest patterns:**
60
+ - Merge into `TOOLKIT_HARVEST.md`
61
+ - Deduplicate by content_hash
62
+ - Preserve maturity level from source
63
+
64
+ **Pipeline metrics:**
65
+ - Store as reference baseline
66
+ - Don't overwrite current project metrics
67
+
68
+ ### Step 4: Write Import Log
69
+
70
+ Create `brain-import-log-[YYYY-MM-DD].md` in project root:
71
+
72
+ ```markdown
73
+ # Brain Import Log
74
+
75
+ - Source: [filename]
76
+ - Source project: [source_project]
77
+ - Imported at: [timestamp]
78
+ - Sections imported: [list]
79
+
80
+ ## Changes Made
81
+ - [list of all changes with before/after]
82
+
83
+ ## Conflicts Resolved
84
+ - [any deduplication or merge decisions]
85
+ ```
86
+
87
+ ### Step 5: Summary
88
+
89
+ ```
90
+ ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
91
+ Brain Import Complete
92
+
93
+ Source: [filename]
94
+ Sections imported: [list]
95
+ Skills updated: [N]
96
+ Patterns merged: [N]
97
+ Conflicts resolved: [N]
98
+
99
+ Import log: brain-import-log-[date].md
100
+
101
+ • "ок" — done
102
+ • "покажи лог" — show full import log
103
+ ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
104
+ ```
105
+
106
+ ## Modular Reuse
107
+
108
+ The import protocol handles:
109
+ - Version compatibility checking
110
+ - Selective import (user chooses sections)
111
+ - Merge-not-overwrite strategy
112
+ - Conflict resolution with logging
113
+ - Audit trail via import log
114
+
115
+ These patterns work for any knowledge transfer between projects.
@@ -7,14 +7,60 @@ Display a checkpoint banner and WAIT for user confirmation before proceeding.
7
7
  ```
8
8
  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
9
9
  ⏸️ CHECKPOINT N: [Phase Name] Complete
10
+ <promise>[PROMISE_TAG]</promise>
11
+
12
+ [2-3 line summary of what was done]
13
+ Files created: [list] ✅
14
+
15
+ • "ок" — next phase
16
+ • "углуби [section]" — elaborate
17
+ • "[specific feedback]" — adjust
18
+ ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
19
+ ```
20
+
21
+ ## Semantic Completion Promises
22
+
23
+ Each checkpoint MUST include the relevant promise tag to signal phase completion status.
24
+ Promises are machine-readable markers that formalize phase gates.
25
+
26
+ ### Promise Tags by Phase
27
+
28
+ | Phase | Promise Tag | Meaning |
29
+ |-------|------------|---------|
30
+ | Phase 0 | `<promise>DISCOVERY_COMPLETE</promise>` | JTBD + competitors + ROI analyzed |
31
+ | Phase 1 | `<promise>CASE_EXPLORED</promise>` | Case fully understood, brief created |
32
+ | Phase 2 | `<promise>RESEARCH_PARANOID_PASSED</promise>` | All claims verified, zero unverified |
33
+ | Phase 2.5 | `<promise>CJM_VALIDATED</promise>` | CJM prototype created and variant chosen |
34
+ | Phase 3 | `<promise>SOLUTION_DESIGNED</promise>` | Solution strategy formulated |
35
+ | Phase 4 | `<promise>ARCHITECTURE_DEFINED</promise>` | C4 diagrams + sequence flows ready |
36
+ | Phase 5 | `<promise>PRESENTATION_READY</promise>` | All 4 artifacts (05-08) created |
37
+ | BTO L0 | `<promise>BTO_LAYER0_PASSED</promise>` | Deterministic checks passed |
38
+ | BTO L2 | `<promise>BTO_LAYER2_SCORED</promise>` | Panel of 3 judges scored artifact |
39
+ | BTO Opt | `<promise>BTO_OPTIMIZED</promise>` | Optimization converged |
40
+
41
+ ### Enhanced Checkpoint Format
42
+
43
+ ```
44
+ ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
45
+ ⏸️ CHECKPOINT N: [Phase Name] Complete
46
+ <promise>[PROMISE_TAG]</promise>
47
+
10
48
  [2-3 line summary of what was done]
11
49
  Files created: [list] ✅
50
+
12
51
  • "ок" — next phase
13
52
  • "углуби [section]" — elaborate
14
53
  • "[specific feedback]" — adjust
15
54
  ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════
16
55
  ```
17
56
 
57
+ ### Promise Validation Rules
58
+
59
+ - A promise tag MUST only be emitted AFTER its conditions are verifiably met
60
+ - If conditions are NOT met, emit `<promise>[TAG]_INCOMPLETE</promise>` instead
61
+ - Downstream phases SHOULD check for upstream promises before starting
62
+ - Promise tags serve as formal phase gates — they replace informal "phase done" signals
63
+
18
64
  ## Rules
19
65
  - NEVER skip checkpoints
20
66
  - NEVER auto-advance to the next phase without user confirmation
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
1
+ # Cross-Phase Feedback Loops
2
+
3
+ ## Purpose
4
+
5
+ Formalize how data flows between phases in the Keysarium pipeline.
6
+ Each loop has a name, direction, data payload, and namespace for persistence.
7
+
8
+ ## Named Feedback Loops
9
+
10
+ ### Loop 1: CJM → Solve (Critical)
11
+
12
+ | Property | Value |
13
+ |----------|-------|
14
+ | Direction | Phase 2.5 → Phase 3 |
15
+ | Variable | `{CHOSEN_CJM}` |
16
+ | Payload | Selected CJM variant (A/B/C/D), pain points, conversion metrics |
17
+ | Consumers | Phase 3 (User Flow), Phase 5 (Slide 5) |
18
+ | Persistence | `researches/<slug>/.feedback/cjm-selection.json` |
19
+
20
+ **Contract:** Phase 3 MUST NOT start without `{CHOSEN_CJM}` being set.
21
+
22
+ ### Loop 2: Research → Presentation
23
+
24
+ | Property | Value |
25
+ |----------|-------|
26
+ | Direction | Phase 2 → Phase 5 |
27
+ | Payload | Key findings, verified sources, statistics |
28
+ | Source file | `02_research_findings.md` |
29
+ | Consumers | Phase 5 (all slides referencing data) |
30
+ | Usage | Presentation claims must trace back to research findings |
31
+
32
+ **Contract:** Every data claim in presentation must have a source in `02_research_findings.md`.
33
+
34
+ ### Loop 3: Discovery → All Phases (Context)
35
+
36
+ | Property | Value |
37
+ |----------|-------|
38
+ | Direction | Phase 0 → Phases 1-5 |
39
+ | Payload | Domain detection, JTBD segments, competitive landscape, business case |
40
+ | Source file | `00_product_discovery.md` |
41
+ | Key fields | `{DOMAIN}`, `{PRIMARY_USER}`, `{AHA_MOMENT}` |
42
+
43
+ **Contract:** Domain-specific rules activate based on Phase 0 detection.
44
+
45
+ ### Loop 4: Solve → Architecture
46
+
47
+ | Property | Value |
48
+ |----------|-------|
49
+ | Direction | Phase 3 → Phase 4 |
50
+ | Payload | Chosen solution strategy, AI pipeline spec, HITL design, MVP scope |
51
+ | Source file | `03_solution_strategy.md` |
52
+ | Key fields | `{SOLUTION_CONCEPT}`, `{AI_PIPELINE}`, `{HITL_POLICY}` |
53
+
54
+ **Contract:** Architecture must implement the solution designed in Phase 3.
55
+
56
+ ### Loop 5: BTO Judges → Optimizer
57
+
58
+ | Property | Value |
59
+ |----------|-------|
60
+ | Direction | BTO Layer 2 → BTO Optimize |
61
+ | Payload | Per-dimension scores, judge feedback, weak dimensions |
62
+ | Source | Layer 2 evaluation reports |
63
+ | Key fields | `{BASELINE_SCORE}`, `{WEAK_DIMENSIONS}`, `{JUDGE_FEEDBACK}` |
64
+
65
+ **Contract:** Optimizer mutations target weak dimensions identified by judges.
66
+
67
+ ### Loop 6: History → Discovery (Cross-Case)
68
+
69
+ | Property | Value |
70
+ |----------|-------|
71
+ | Direction | Past cases → Phase 0 of new case |
72
+ | Payload | Domain patterns, common pitfalls, successful strategies |
73
+ | Source | `TOOLKIT_HARVEST.md`, brain export files |
74
+ | Persistence | `keysarium-brain.json` |
75
+
76
+ **Contract:** If brain file exists, Phase 0 loads historical patterns before starting.
77
+
78
+ ## Feedback Loop Protocol
79
+
80
+ ### At Phase Start
81
+ 1. Check upstream promises are met
82
+ 2. Load required source files
83
+ 3. Extract key variables from upstream outputs
84
+ 4. Apply domain-specific rules from Loop 3
85
+
86
+ ### At Phase End
87
+ 1. Emit phase promise tag
88
+ 2. Write key outputs for downstream consumers
89
+ 3. Validate contract fulfillment
90
+
91
+ ## Variable Registry
92
+
93
+ All cross-phase variables in one place:
94
+
95
+ | Variable | Set In | Used In | Type |
96
+ |----------|--------|---------|------|
97
+ | `{DOMAIN}` | Phase 0 | All phases | string (banking/retail/enterprise/healthcare) |
98
+ | `{PRIMARY_USER}` | Phase 0 | Phase 2.5, 3, 5 | string |
99
+ | `{AHA_MOMENT}` | Phase 0 | Phase 2.5, 5 | string |
100
+ | `{CHOSEN_CJM}` | Phase 2.5 | Phase 3, 5 | string (A/B/C/D) |
101
+ | `{SOLUTION_CONCEPT}` | Phase 3 | Phase 4, 5 | string |
102
+ | `{AI_PIPELINE}` | Phase 3 | Phase 4 | structured |
103
+ | `{HITL_POLICY}` | Phase 3 | Phase 4, 5 | structured |
104
+ | `{BASELINE_SCORE}` | BTO L2 | BTO Optimize | float |
105
+ | `{WEAK_DIMENSIONS}` | BTO L2 | BTO Optimize | list[string] |
106
+
107
+ ## Modular Reuse Note
108
+
109
+ This feedback loop system is domain-agnostic. The same pattern applies to any multi-phase pipeline:
110
+ 1. Define named loops with direction and payload
111
+ 2. Set contracts (what must exist before proceeding)
112
+ 3. Register variables in a central registry
113
+ 4. Validate contracts at phase boundaries
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
1
+ # Model Routing Enforcement
2
+
3
+ ## 3-Tier Model Routing
4
+
5
+ All agent spawning MUST follow the model routing table below.
6
+ Using a higher-cost model than necessary wastes budget.
7
+ Using a lower-cost model than required degrades quality.
8
+
9
+ ## Routing Table
10
+
11
+ | Tier | Model | Latency | When to Use |
12
+ |------|-------|---------|-------------|
13
+ | Tier 1 | haiku | ~500ms | File formatting, simple transforms, Layer 0 checks, Layer 1 quick eval, BTO variant fast-ranking |
14
+ | Tier 2 | sonnet | ~2s | Research synthesis, analysis, BTO Layer 2 judge panel, mutation workers, meta-judge escalation |
15
+ | Tier 3 | opus (default) | ~5s | Creative CJM design, presentation storytelling, BTO crossover synthesis, complex problem solving |
16
+
17
+ ## Per-Task Assignment
18
+
19
+ ### Keysarium Pipeline
20
+
21
+ | Task | Model | Rationale |
22
+ |------|-------|-----------|
23
+ | Phase 0 parallel agents (JTBD, Competitors) | sonnet | Research synthesis |
24
+ | Phase 1 exploration | opus | Creative clarification |
25
+ | Phase 2 parallel agents (Analogues, Tech, Regulations) | sonnet | Research analysis |
26
+ | Phase 2.5 CJM variant generation | opus | Creative design work |
27
+ | Phase 2.5 trend research agents | sonnet | Research synthesis |
28
+ | Phase 3 solution design | opus | Complex problem solving |
29
+ | Phase 4 architecture | opus | System design |
30
+ | Phase 5 presentation storytelling | opus | Creative storytelling |
31
+ | Phase 5 speaker script agents | sonnet | Structured generation |
32
+ | Phase 5 Q&A preparation | sonnet | Analytical work |
33
+ | File formatting, slug generation | haiku | Simple transforms |
34
+
35
+ ### BTO Pipeline
36
+
37
+ | Task | Model | Rationale |
38
+ |------|-------|-----------|
39
+ | Layer 0 structural checks | haiku | Pattern matching only |
40
+ | Layer 1 semantic baseline | haiku | Fast coherence scan |
41
+ | Layer 2 Domain Expert judge | sonnet | Domain knowledge + nuanced scoring |
42
+ | Layer 2 Critic judge | sonnet | Adversarial analysis |
43
+ | Layer 2 Completeness Auditor judge | sonnet | Structured coverage check |
44
+ | Meta-judge (disagreement resolution) | sonnet | Arbitration |
45
+ | Optimization variant fast-eval (Round 1, 2) | haiku | Volume scoring |
46
+ | Optimization Round 3 full panel | sonnet | Final quality assessment |
47
+ | Optimization crossover / creative synthesis | opus | Novel combination of candidates |
48
+
49
+ ## Enforcement Rules
50
+
51
+ 1. **NEVER** use opus for Layer 0 or Layer 1 evaluation — this is wasteful
52
+ 2. **NEVER** use haiku for Layer 2 judge panel — quality will be insufficient
53
+ 3. **NEVER** use haiku for creative work (CJM design, storytelling) — output will be shallow
54
+ 4. When spawning agents with the Agent tool, ALWAYS specify the `model` parameter
55
+ 5. If model is not specified, the agent inherits the parent model (opus by default)
56
+ 6. For cost optimization, prefer haiku for any task that is primarily pattern-matching or formatting
57
+
58
+ ## Cost Impact
59
+
60
+ Approximate cost ratios (per 1K output tokens):
61
+ - haiku: 1x (baseline)
62
+ - sonnet: 15x
63
+ - opus: 75x
64
+
65
+ Using haiku instead of opus for Layer 0-1 saves ~98% on those evaluation steps.
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
1
+ # Trust Tier System
2
+
3
+ ## Tier Definitions
4
+
5
+ | Tier | Label | Requirements | Promotion Path |
6
+ |------|-------|-------------|----------------|
7
+ | Tier 3 | Verified | Eval test suites with deterministic validation | — (highest) |
8
+ | Tier 2 | Validated | Passed /bto-test with Layer 2 score ≥ 7.0 | Run /bto-test, score ≥ 8.5 on Layer 2 |
9
+ | Tier 1 | Structured | SKILL.md + references/ or modules/ | Run /bto-test, score ≥ 7.0 on Layer 2 |
10
+ | Tier 0 | Advisory | Basic SKILL.md only | Add references/, examples/, structured output |
11
+
12
+ ## Current Skill Tiers
13
+
14
+ | Skill | Tier | Label | Evidence |
15
+ |-------|------|-------|----------|
16
+ | explore | 1 | Structured | SKILL.md + references/ |
17
+ | frontend-design | 0 | Advisory | SKILL.md only, no references |
18
+ | goap-research-ed25519 | 1 | Structured | SKILL.md + references/ + scripts/ |
19
+ | problem-solver-enhanced | 1 | Structured | Comprehensive SKILL.md with TRIZ framework |
20
+ | presentation-storyteller | 1 | Structured | SKILL.md + references/ |
21
+ | reverse-engineering-unicorn | 1 | Structured | SKILL.md + modules/ + references/ + examples/ |
22
+ | bto | 1 | Structured | SKILL.md + modules/ + references/ + examples/ |
23
+
24
+ ## Tier Enforcement
25
+
26
+ - Tier 0 skills: Flag with warning when loaded in production pipeline
27
+ - Tier 1 skills: Standard usage, recommend /bto-test for promotion
28
+ - Tier 2 skills: Full confidence, include BTO score in metadata
29
+ - Tier 3 skills: Highest confidence, deterministic validation available
30
+
31
+ ## Promotion Protocol
32
+
33
+ 1. Run `/bto-test .claude/skills/<name>/`
34
+ 2. If Layer 2 score ≥ 7.0 → promote to Tier 2, record score in SKILL.md
35
+ 3. If Layer 2 score ≥ 8.5 + deterministic eval tests exist → promote to Tier 3
36
+ 4. Record promotion date and score in SKILL.md frontmatter
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
1
+ # Phase 0: Discovery — Governance Shard
2
+
3
+ ## Time Budget
4
+ 15% of total timeline
5
+
6
+ ## Skill
7
+ Load: `.claude/skills/reverse-engineering-unicorn/SKILL.md` (modules M2-M5)
8
+
9
+ ## Mandatory Outputs
10
+ - `00_product_discovery.md`
11
+
12
+ ## Content Requirements
13
+ - As-Is process mapping
14
+ - JTBD segments (minimum 3)
15
+ - Voice of Customer synthesis
16
+ - Aha Moment identification
17
+ - Why AI / Why Now justification
18
+ - Competitive landscape (minimum 3 competitors)
19
+ - Business Case with ROI projections
20
+ - Adoption Strategy
21
+
22
+ ## Agent Swarm
23
+ - Agent 1 (sonnet): JTBD + Voice of Customer + Aha Moment
24
+ - Agent 2 (sonnet): Competitor Analysis + Business Case + Why AI Why Now
25
+ - Synthesize results into single document
26
+
27
+ ## Domain Detection
28
+ Detect domain from case description and apply domain-specific rules:
29
+ - Banking: on-premise LLM, ФЗ-152, ЦБ, ФСТЭК
30
+ - Retail: latency < 200ms, A/B testing
31
+ - Enterprise: Change Management, Legacy integration
32
+ - Healthcare: HITL mandatory, ФЗ-323
33
+
34
+ ## Quality Gates
35
+ - Zero unverified competitor names
36
+ - ROI must include concrete numbers (FTE/hours/currency)
37
+ - JTBD format: "When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]"
38
+
39
+ ## Promise
40
+ On completion: `<promise>DISCOVERY_COMPLETE</promise>`
41
+
42
+ ## Anti-Patterns to Check
43
+ - "Just add GPT" without specific model/pipeline → BLOCK
44
+ - No metrics/KPIs → BLOCK
45
+ - Vague claims without numbers → FLAG
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
1
+ # Phase 1: Explore — Governance Shard
2
+
3
+ ## Time Budget
4
+ 5% of total timeline
5
+
6
+ ## Skill
7
+ Load: `.claude/skills/explore/SKILL.md`
8
+
9
+ ## Prerequisites
10
+ - Phase 0 complete: `<promise>DISCOVERY_COMPLETE</promise>`
11
+ - File exists: `00_product_discovery.md`
12
+
13
+ ## Mandatory Outputs
14
+ - `01_case_brief.md`
15
+
16
+ ## Content Requirements
17
+ - 5 Whys root cause analysis
18
+ - Data landscape analysis
19
+ - Constraints Map: hard / soft / hidden
20
+ - Success Criteria (measurable)
21
+ - Key Question (single, focused)
22
+
23
+ ## Model Routing
24
+ - Default model (opus) for creative clarification
25
+
26
+ ## Quality Gates
27
+ - Constraints must be categorized (hard/soft/hidden)
28
+ - Success criteria must be quantifiable
29
+ - Key Question must be single and actionable
30
+
31
+ ## Promise
32
+ On completion: `<promise>CASE_EXPLORED</promise>`