@dzhechkov/keysarium-core 1.0.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
1
+ # @dzhechkov/keysarium-core
2
+
3
+ Core framework for building multi-agent pipelines with governance, memory, orchestration, verification, and trust tier systems.
4
+
5
+ ## What is keysarium-core?
6
+
7
+ keysarium-core provides **domain-agnostic protocols** for any AI-powered multi-agent pipeline. It defines how agents coordinate, how decisions are verified, how the system learns from past executions, and how governance rules are enforced.
8
+
9
+ Think of it as the "operating system" for multi-agent workflows. You bring the domain-specific skills and pipeline stages; keysarium-core provides the infrastructure.
10
+
11
+ ## Modules
12
+
13
+ | Module | Purpose | Key Protocols |
14
+ |--------|---------|---------------|
15
+ | **governance/** | Structural rules and human checkpoints | Constitution, shard protocol, promise tags |
16
+ | **memory/** | Persistent learning across executions | memory_query, memory_store, reward tracking, dream cycles |
17
+ | **orchestration/** | Agent coordination and model routing | Queen protocol, 6 topologies, background workers, 3-tier routing |
18
+ | **verification/** | Cryptographic integrity and isolation proofs | SHA-256 witness chain, judge attestation, audit trail |
19
+ | **trust-tiers/** | Skill/artifact quality classification | 4-tier system (Advisory to Verified), promotion protocol |
20
+ | **platform/** | Multi-platform config generation | Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot adapters |
21
+
22
+ ## Quick Start
23
+
24
+ ### Installation
25
+
26
+ ```bash
27
+ npm install @dzhechkov/keysarium-core
28
+ ```
29
+
30
+ ### Using with an Existing Pipeline
31
+
32
+ keysarium-core protocols are markdown-based. They define algorithms, schemas, and rules that AI agents read and follow. To integrate:
33
+
34
+ 1. **Governance:** Read `governance/constitution.md` at pipeline start to load invariants
35
+ 2. **Memory:** Call `memory_query()` before each stage, `memory_store()` after each checkpoint
36
+ 3. **Orchestration:** Select topology per stage from `orchestration/topology-selection.md`
37
+ 4. **Verification:** Create witness chain records at each stage completion
38
+ 5. **Trust Tiers:** Classify your skills using `trust-tiers/tier-system.md`
39
+
40
+ ### Using with Keysarium Research Pipeline
41
+
42
+ ```bash
43
+ npm install @dzhechkov/keysarium @dzhechkov/keysarium-core
44
+ ```
45
+
46
+ ### Using with BTO Evaluation Pipeline
47
+
48
+ ```bash
49
+ npm install @dzhechkov/skills-bto @dzhechkov/keysarium-core
50
+ ```
51
+
52
+ ## Architecture
53
+
54
+ ```
55
+ @dzhechkov/keysarium-core <-- You are here
56
+ ^ ^
57
+ | |
58
+ peerDep peerDep
59
+ | |
60
+ @dzhechkov/keysarium @dzhechkov/skills-bto
61
+ (research) (evaluation)
62
+ ```
63
+
64
+ keysarium-core has **zero dependencies** on either consumer package. Both consumers declare keysarium-core as a peer dependency. Any team can use keysarium-core independently to build their own pipeline.
65
+
66
+ ## Module Reference
67
+
68
+ ### Governance
69
+
70
+ - `constitution.md` — Universal invariants that must never be violated
71
+ - `shard-protocol.md` — How to create per-stage governance rules that are reloaded at each stage to prevent context drift
72
+ - `checkpoint-protocol.md` — Human synchronization points with promise tags for machine-readable completion signals
73
+
74
+ ### Memory
75
+
76
+ - `memory-protocol.md` — Core `memory_query()` / `memory_store()` protocol for loading and persisting execution patterns with reward scores
77
+ - `reward-tracker.md` — Analytics engine: per-stage averages, per-domain breakdowns, bottleneck detection, trend analysis
78
+ - `dream-engine.md` — Background consolidation: builds concept graphs from accumulated data and generates cross-domain insights
79
+
80
+ ### Orchestration
81
+
82
+ - `queen-protocol.md` — 10-step coordinator lifecycle: init, health, load, detect, shard, orchestrate, monitor, collect, store, report
83
+ - `topology-selection.md` — 6 agent arrangement patterns: star, mesh, hierarchical, ring, hybrid, adaptive
84
+ - `background-workers.md` — Non-blocking worker protocol: launch, status, stop, error handling, isolation rules
85
+ - `model-routing.md` — 3-tier model assignment: haiku (fast/cheap), sonnet (balanced), opus (creative/complex)
86
+
87
+ ### Verification
88
+
89
+ - `witness-chain.md` — SHA-256 hash-chain protocol for tamper-evident artifact integrity
90
+ - `judge-attestation.md` — Cryptographic proof that evaluators operated independently
91
+ - `audit-trail.md` — Complete evaluation history format with chain integrity verification
92
+
93
+ ### Trust Tiers
94
+
95
+ - `tier-system.md` — 4-tier classification: Tier 0 (Advisory), Tier 1 (Structured), Tier 2 (Validated), Tier 3 (Verified)
96
+ - `promotion-protocol.md` — How to promote skills between tiers based on evaluation evidence
97
+
98
+ ### Platform
99
+
100
+ - `adapter-registry.md` — Central registry of supported AI coding platforms
101
+ - `templates/cursor.md` — Cursor (.cursorrules) generation template
102
+ - `templates/opencode.md` — OpenCode (.opencode/) generation template
103
+ - `templates/copilot.md` — GitHub Copilot (.github/copilot-instructions.md) generation template
104
+
105
+ ## Building Your Own Pipeline
106
+
107
+ To create a custom multi-agent pipeline using keysarium-core:
108
+
109
+ 1. Define your stages (equivalent to Keysarium's phases or BTO's layers)
110
+ 2. Create governance shards for each stage using `governance/shard-protocol.md`
111
+ 3. Choose topologies per stage using `orchestration/topology-selection.md`
112
+ 4. Configure model routing using `orchestration/model-routing.md`
113
+ 5. Implement witness chain at stage boundaries using `verification/witness-chain.md`
114
+ 6. Enable learning with `memory/memory-protocol.md`
115
+
116
+ ## Origins
117
+
118
+ keysarium-core was extracted from the [Keysarium](https://github.com/dzhechko/product-keysarium-2026) project, which implements a 7-phase AI research pipeline. The protocols are inspired by:
119
+
120
+ - **Ruflo** — 7-layer governance, 6 topologies, 3-tier model routing
121
+ - **Agentic QE** — Trust tiers, reward-calibrated learning, dream cycles, PACT principles
122
+ - **Quality Forge** — Portable brain containers, SHA-256 witness chains
123
+
124
+ ## License
125
+
126
+ MIT
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
1
+ # Checkpoint Protocol — Human Synchronization Points
2
+
3
+ > Universal protocol for checkpoints and semantic completion promises in multi-agent pipelines.
4
+
5
+ ## Overview
6
+
7
+ A checkpoint is a mandatory pause point where the pipeline stops and waits for human confirmation before proceeding. Checkpoints serve three purposes:
8
+
9
+ 1. **Quality gate** — Human reviews the stage output before the next stage begins
10
+ 2. **Feedback loop** — Human provides corrections or approvals that calibrate the system
11
+ 3. **Completion signal** — A machine-readable promise tag records that the stage is done
12
+
13
+ ## Checkpoint Format
14
+
15
+ ```
16
+ =====================================================
17
+ CHECKPOINT {N}: {Stage Name} Complete
18
+ <promise>{PROMISE_TAG}</promise>
19
+
20
+ {2-3 line summary of what was accomplished}
21
+ Artifacts created: {list of files}
22
+
23
+ Options:
24
+ - "ok" / "proceed" — advance to next stage
25
+ - "deepen {section}" — elaborate on a specific section
26
+ - "{specific feedback}" — adjust current stage output
27
+ =====================================================
28
+ ```
29
+
30
+ ## Semantic Completion Promises
31
+
32
+ ### What is a Promise?
33
+
34
+ A promise is a machine-readable tag embedded in the checkpoint output that signals the stage's completion status. It follows the format:
35
+
36
+ ```
37
+ <promise>{TAG_NAME}</promise>
38
+ ```
39
+
40
+ ### Promise Rules
41
+
42
+ 1. A promise tag MUST only be emitted AFTER its conditions are verifiably met
43
+ 2. If conditions are NOT met, emit `<promise>{TAG_NAME}_INCOMPLETE</promise>` instead
44
+ 3. Downstream stages SHOULD check for upstream promises before starting
45
+ 4. Promise tags replace informal "stage done" signals with formal, parseable markers
46
+
47
+ ### Defining Promises for Your Pipeline
48
+
49
+ Each stage in your pipeline should define:
50
+
51
+ | Stage | Promise Tag | Conditions |
52
+ |-------|-------------|------------|
53
+ | Stage 0 | `{PIPELINE}_STAGE_0_COMPLETE` | All stage 0 artifacts created and validated |
54
+ | Stage 1 | `{PIPELINE}_STAGE_1_COMPLETE` | All stage 1 artifacts created and validated |
55
+ | ... | ... | ... |
56
+
57
+ Replace `{PIPELINE}` with your pipeline's name (e.g., `RESEARCH`, `BTO`, `QE`).
58
+
59
+ ### Promise Validation
60
+
61
+ At each stage start, the orchestrator should verify upstream promises:
62
+
63
+ ```
64
+ 1. Read the checkpoint history
65
+ 2. Check that all required upstream promises exist
66
+ 3. If any promise is missing or has _INCOMPLETE suffix:
67
+ a. Log: "Missing prerequisite: {TAG_NAME}"
68
+ b. Do NOT proceed — return to the incomplete stage
69
+ ```
70
+
71
+ ## Checkpoint Behavior
72
+
73
+ ### On "ok" Response
74
+
75
+ 1. Store the reward (1.0 — excellent) via memory_store
76
+ 2. Emit the stage's promise tag
77
+ 3. Advance to the next stage
78
+
79
+ ### On Feedback Response
80
+
81
+ 1. Parse feedback to determine scope
82
+ 2. If minor (one section): store reward 0.7, adjust, re-checkpoint
83
+ 3. If major (multiple sections): store reward 0.3, rework, re-checkpoint
84
+ 4. If restart requested: store reward 0.0, restart stage from scratch
85
+
86
+ ### On No Response
87
+
88
+ If the session ends without a response at the checkpoint:
89
+ - Do NOT store any reward (no record created)
90
+ - Do NOT emit any promise tag
91
+ - The stage remains in an indeterminate state
92
+
93
+ ## Checkpoint Timing
94
+
95
+ Each checkpoint should display time spent vs. budget:
96
+
97
+ ```
98
+ Time: {minutes_spent}m / {budget}m ({percentage}%)
99
+ ```
100
+
101
+ If a stage exceeds its time budget, the checkpoint should include a warning:
102
+
103
+ ```
104
+ Warning: Time budget exceeded ({percentage}% used). Consider wrapping up.
105
+ ```
106
+
107
+ ## Integration with Governance
108
+
109
+ Checkpoints are the primary enforcement point for governance rules:
110
+
111
+ 1. Before displaying the checkpoint, run all constitution invariant checks
112
+ 2. Before displaying the checkpoint, validate all quality gates from the stage's shard
113
+ 3. If any gate fails, indicate it in the checkpoint and require the human to acknowledge
114
+
115
+ ## Integration with Memory
116
+
117
+ After each checkpoint response:
118
+
119
+ 1. Determine the reward score based on the human's response type
120
+ 2. Call `memory_store()` with the stage context and reward
121
+ 3. This enables the system to learn which stages perform well and which need improvement
122
+
123
+ ## Integration with Witness Chain
124
+
125
+ After each checkpoint with "ok" response:
126
+
127
+ 1. Compute the SHA-256 hash of the stage's primary artifact
128
+ 2. Append a record to the witness chain
129
+ 3. The promise tag is recorded in the chain record
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
1
+ # Constitution — Universal Invariants
2
+
3
+ > Unbreakable rules for any multi-agent pipeline. These invariants are enforced at every stage gate and may never be violated.
4
+
5
+ ## Overview
6
+
7
+ A Constitution defines the set of rules that are **always true** regardless of pipeline configuration, domain, or stage. They serve as hard enforcement gates — if an invariant is violated, the pipeline must halt.
8
+
9
+ This is inspired by the 7-layer governance model (Ruflo) and the 7 constitutional invariants (Agentic QE).
10
+
11
+ ## Defining Invariants
12
+
13
+ Each invariant follows this format:
14
+
15
+ ```markdown
16
+ ### INV-{NNN}: {Short Name}
17
+
18
+ **Rule:** {One-sentence statement of what must always be true}
19
+
20
+ **Enforcement:** {How to check — deterministic check, file existence, hash verification, etc.}
21
+
22
+ **On violation:** {HALT | WARN | RETRY(N)}
23
+
24
+ **Rationale:** {Why this invariant exists}
25
+ ```
26
+
27
+ ## Template Invariants
28
+
29
+ The following invariants are recommended as a starting point for any multi-agent pipeline. Customize or extend based on your domain.
30
+
31
+ ### INV-001: Artifact Integrity
32
+
33
+ **Rule:** Every artifact produced by a stage must be verifiable against its witness chain hash.
34
+
35
+ **Enforcement:** After each stage completion, verify that the artifact file exists and its SHA-256 hash matches the chain record.
36
+
37
+ **On violation:** HALT — artifact may have been tampered with.
38
+
39
+ **Rationale:** Ensures no artifact is silently modified between stages.
40
+
41
+ ### INV-002: Stage Completion Signal
42
+
43
+ **Rule:** A stage may not be marked complete without emitting a promise tag.
44
+
45
+ **Enforcement:** Check that the stage's checkpoint includes a `<promise>` tag matching the expected value.
46
+
47
+ **On violation:** HALT — downstream stages cannot trust upstream completion.
48
+
49
+ **Rationale:** Promise tags are machine-readable signals that formalize stage gates.
50
+
51
+ ### INV-003: Human Checkpoint Required
52
+
53
+ **Rule:** A stage may not auto-advance to the next stage without human confirmation at the checkpoint.
54
+
55
+ **Enforcement:** The orchestrator must wait for explicit user input before proceeding.
56
+
57
+ **On violation:** HALT — no auto-advancement permitted.
58
+
59
+ **Rationale:** Human-in-the-loop prevents runaway automation and ensures quality.
60
+
61
+ ### INV-004: Evaluator Independence
62
+
63
+ **Rule:** Evaluators (judges) in a multi-evaluator panel must operate in strict isolation. No evaluator may see another evaluator's score before submitting its own.
64
+
65
+ **Enforcement:** Judge attestation protocol — each judge creates a hash of its evaluation before scores are shared.
66
+
67
+ **On violation:** HALT — evaluation integrity compromised.
68
+
69
+ **Rationale:** Independent evaluation prevents conformity collapse and produces more reliable quality signals.
70
+
71
+ ### INV-005: Loop Detection
72
+
73
+ **Rule:** No agent may perform the same action more than 3 consecutive times without variation.
74
+
75
+ **Enforcement:** Track the last 3 actions per agent. If identical, halt and escalate.
76
+
77
+ **On violation:** WARN + escalate to coordinator.
78
+
79
+ **Rationale:** Prevents infinite loops and wasted resources.
80
+
81
+ ### INV-006: Memory Consistency
82
+
83
+ **Rule:** No contradictory patterns may coexist in the memory system.
84
+
85
+ **Enforcement:** When storing a new pattern, check for existing patterns with the same pattern_id but conflicting content. If found, the newer pattern supersedes the older.
86
+
87
+ **On violation:** WARN — resolve by keeping the most recent pattern.
88
+
89
+ **Rationale:** Contradictory patterns degrade learning quality.
90
+
91
+ ### INV-007: No Unverified Claims
92
+
93
+ **Rule:** Research outputs must not contain unverified factual claims presented as verified.
94
+
95
+ **Enforcement:** Scan output artifacts for factual claims. Each must have a source citation or be marked as `[ANALYSIS]` or `[UNVERIFIED]`.
96
+
97
+ **On violation:** HALT — return to research stage for verification.
98
+
99
+ **Rationale:** Unverified claims undermine the credibility of the entire pipeline output.
100
+
101
+ ## Customization
102
+
103
+ ### Adding Domain-Specific Invariants
104
+
105
+ To add invariants for your pipeline:
106
+
107
+ 1. Create a file `governance/constitution-{domain}.md` with additional invariants
108
+ 2. Number new invariants starting from INV-100 (to avoid conflicts with core)
109
+ 3. Follow the same format (Rule, Enforcement, On violation, Rationale)
110
+
111
+ ### Example: Banking Domain
112
+
113
+ ```markdown
114
+ ### INV-100: Data Perimeter
115
+
116
+ **Rule:** No customer data may leave the security perimeter.
117
+
118
+ **Enforcement:** All LLM calls must be to on-premise models (no external API calls).
119
+
120
+ **On violation:** HALT — regulatory breach (FZ-152).
121
+ ```
122
+
123
+ ### Example: Evaluation Domain (BTO)
124
+
125
+ ```markdown
126
+ ### INV-100: Judge-Generator Separation
127
+
128
+ **Rule:** The model used for generating an artifact must differ from the model used for evaluating it.
129
+
130
+ **Enforcement:** Compare model IDs at evaluation start.
131
+
132
+ **On violation:** HALT — self-evaluation bias.
133
+ ```
134
+
135
+ ## Enforcement Integration
136
+
137
+ At each stage gate (checkpoint), the orchestrator should:
138
+
139
+ 1. Load the constitution (this file)
140
+ 2. Load any domain-specific constitution extensions
141
+ 3. Run each invariant's enforcement check
142
+ 4. If any check fails with HALT severity, stop the pipeline
143
+ 5. If any check fails with WARN severity, log and continue
144
+ 6. If any check fails with RETRY severity, retry up to N times before halting
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
1
+ # Shard Protocol — Per-Stage Governance Rules
2
+
3
+ > How to create and load governance shards that prevent context drift during long sessions.
4
+
5
+ ## Problem
6
+
7
+ In long-running multi-agent sessions, rules loaded at the beginning drift out of the agent's active context after approximately 40 minutes. By the time later stages execute, the agent may have "forgotten" critical rules.
8
+
9
+ ## Solution
10
+
11
+ Each pipeline stage gets its own **governance shard** — a focused set of rules that is re-read at the start of that stage. This ensures the agent always has the relevant rules in active context.
12
+
13
+ ## Shard Format
14
+
15
+ Each shard is a markdown file with the following structure:
16
+
17
+ ```markdown
18
+ # {Stage Name} Governance Shard
19
+
20
+ ## Time Budget
21
+ - Allocated: {percentage}% of total pipeline time
22
+ - Hard limit: {minutes} minutes
23
+
24
+ ## Prerequisites
25
+ - Required upstream promises: [{PROMISE_TAG_1}, {PROMISE_TAG_2}]
26
+ - Required input files: [{file_list}]
27
+
28
+ ## Skill to Load
29
+ - Primary: {skill_name} (read SKILL.md at: {path})
30
+ - Secondary: {skill_name} (optional)
31
+
32
+ ## Rules for This Stage
33
+ 1. {Rule 1 — specific to this stage}
34
+ 2. {Rule 2}
35
+ 3. ...
36
+
37
+ ## Quality Gates
38
+ - [ ] {Gate 1 — what must be true for this stage to pass}
39
+ - [ ] {Gate 2}
40
+ - [ ] {Gate 3}
41
+
42
+ ## Promise Tag
43
+ On successful completion, emit: `<promise>{PROMISE_TAG}</promise>`
44
+
45
+ ## Anti-Patterns for This Stage
46
+ | Pattern | Fix |
47
+ |---------|-----|
48
+ | {Anti-pattern 1} | {Fix} |
49
+ | {Anti-pattern 2} | {Fix} |
50
+ ```
51
+
52
+ ## Shard Naming Convention
53
+
54
+ ```
55
+ {stage-id}.shard.md
56
+ ```
57
+
58
+ Examples:
59
+ - `stage-0-init.shard.md`
60
+ - `stage-1-analysis.shard.md`
61
+ - `stage-2-research.shard.md`
62
+ - `bto-evaluation.shard.md`
63
+
64
+ ## Shard Loading Protocol
65
+
66
+ At the start of each stage:
67
+
68
+ 1. **Determine shard path:** Construct the shard filename from the stage ID
69
+ 2. **Read shard:** Load the shard file content into the agent's context
70
+ 3. **Validate prerequisites:** Check that all required upstream promises have been emitted
71
+ 4. **Validate inputs:** Check that all required input files exist
72
+ 5. **Load skill:** If the shard specifies a skill, read its SKILL.md
73
+ 6. **Start timer:** Begin tracking time against the shard's budget
74
+ 7. **Execute stage:** Follow the shard's rules and quality gates
75
+
76
+ ## Shard Directory Location
77
+
78
+ Shards should be stored in a dedicated directory within your pipeline configuration:
79
+
80
+ ```
81
+ {pipeline-config}/shards/
82
+ ├── stage-0-init.shard.md
83
+ ├── stage-1-analysis.shard.md
84
+ ├── stage-2-research.shard.md
85
+ ├── stage-3-design.shard.md
86
+ └── ...
87
+ ```
88
+
89
+ ## Creating a New Shard
90
+
91
+ To create a shard for a new stage:
92
+
93
+ 1. Copy the template format above
94
+ 2. Fill in the stage-specific rules, quality gates, and anti-patterns
95
+ 3. Define the time budget (as a percentage of total pipeline time)
96
+ 4. List prerequisites (upstream promise tags)
97
+ 5. Specify the skill to load (if applicable)
98
+ 6. Define the promise tag this stage emits on completion
99
+ 7. Save to the shards directory with the naming convention
100
+
101
+ ## Shard Compilation
102
+
103
+ For complex pipelines, the master configuration file (e.g., CLAUDE.md) can be "compiled" into per-stage shards at pipeline start:
104
+
105
+ 1. Read the master configuration
106
+ 2. Extract stage-relevant rules
107
+ 3. Generate shards with only the rules applicable to each stage
108
+ 4. Each agent receives a focused, lightweight governance document instead of the full configuration
109
+
110
+ This reduces context load from hundreds of lines to 30-50 lines per stage.
111
+
112
+ ## Best Practices
113
+
114
+ - Keep each shard under 100 lines for optimal context usage
115
+ - Include only rules relevant to the current stage
116
+ - Always include the promise tag for completion signaling
117
+ - Always include time budget to prevent stages from running indefinitely
118
+ - Review and update shards when pipeline rules change
package/index.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
1
+ # keysarium-core Module Index
2
+
3
+ > Manifest of all modules in @dzhechkov/keysarium-core v1.0.0
4
+
5
+ ## Module Registry
6
+
7
+ | Module | Version | Files | Trust Tier | Description |
8
+ |--------|---------|-------|------------|-------------|
9
+ | governance | 1.0 | 3 | Tier 1 — Structured | Constitution, shards, checkpoints |
10
+ | memory | 1.0 | 3 | Tier 1 — Structured | Reward-calibrated learning + dream cycles |
11
+ | orchestration | 1.0 | 4 | Tier 1 — Structured | Coordinator protocol + topologies + workers |
12
+ | verification | 1.0 | 3 | Tier 1 — Structured | Hash chains + judge attestation + audit trail |
13
+ | trust-tiers | 1.0 | 2 | Tier 1 — Structured | 4-tier classification + promotion |
14
+ | platform | 1.0 | 4 | Tier 0 — Advisory | Multi-platform adapter templates |
15
+
16
+ ## File Manifest
17
+
18
+ ```
19
+ @dzhechkov/keysarium-core/
20
+ ├── package.json
21
+ ├── README.md
22
+ ├── index.md ← This file
23
+
24
+ ├── governance/
25
+ │ ├── constitution.md ← v1.0 — Universal invariants
26
+ │ ├── shard-protocol.md ← v1.0 — Per-stage governance shards
27
+ │ └── checkpoint-protocol.md ← v1.0 — Checkpoints + promise tags
28
+
29
+ ├── memory/
30
+ │ ├── memory-protocol.md ← v1.0 — memory_query + memory_store
31
+ │ ├── reward-tracker.md ← v1.0 — Analytics + pattern detection
32
+ │ └── dream-engine.md ← v1.0 — Background insight generation
33
+
34
+ ├── orchestration/
35
+ │ ├── queen-protocol.md ← v1.0 — 10-step coordinator lifecycle
36
+ │ ├── topology-selection.md ← v1.0 — 6 topology types
37
+ │ ├── background-workers.md ← v1.0 — Non-blocking worker protocol
38
+ │ └── model-routing.md ← v1.0 — 3-tier model assignment
39
+
40
+ ├── verification/
41
+ │ ├── witness-chain.md ← v1.0 — SHA-256 hash-chain
42
+ │ ├── judge-attestation.md ← v1.0 — Evaluator isolation proofs
43
+ │ └── audit-trail.md ← v1.0 — Evaluation history format
44
+
45
+ ├── trust-tiers/
46
+ │ ├── tier-system.md ← v1.0 — 4-tier classification
47
+ │ └── promotion-protocol.md ← v1.0 — Tier advancement rules
48
+
49
+ └── platform/
50
+ ├── adapter-registry.md ← v1.0 — Platform adapter definitions
51
+ └── templates/
52
+ ├── cursor.md ← v1.0 — Cursor generation template
53
+ ├── opencode.md ← v1.0 — OpenCode generation template
54
+ └── copilot.md ← v1.0 — GitHub Copilot generation template
55
+ ```
56
+
57
+ ## Protocol Version History
58
+
59
+ | Version | Date | Changes |
60
+ |---------|------|---------|
61
+ | 1.0 | 2026-03-01 | Initial extraction from Keysarium v1.1.x and lib/ protocols |
62
+
63
+ ## Dependency Graph
64
+
65
+ ```
66
+ governance ───> (standalone, no internal deps)
67
+ memory ───> (standalone, no internal deps)
68
+ orchestration ───> (standalone, no internal deps)
69
+ verification ───> (standalone, no internal deps)
70
+ trust-tiers ───> (standalone, no internal deps)
71
+ platform ───> (standalone, no internal deps)
72
+ ```
73
+
74
+ All modules are independent. A consumer may use any subset of modules without importing the others.
75
+
76
+ ## Schema Compatibility
77
+
78
+ All JSON schemas defined in this package use `"version": "1.0"` as a schema version field. Consumers should check this field and warn if it does not match expected version.
79
+
80
+ ## Terminology Mapping
81
+
82
+ When adapting core protocols for a specific domain:
83
+
84
+ | Core Term | Replace With | Example |
85
+ |-----------|-------------|---------|
86
+ | stage | Your pipeline unit | "phase" (Keysarium), "layer" (BTO) |
87
+ | project | Your work unit | "research" (Keysarium), "artifact" (BTO) |
88
+ | domain | Your category system | "banking/retail" (Keysarium), "skill type" (BTO) |
89
+ | skill | Your capability unit | "explore/research" (Keysarium), "build/test" (BTO) |