@dmsdc-ai/aigentry-deliberation 0.0.26 → 0.0.27

package/decision-engine.js

@@ -0,0 +1,1006 @@
+/**
+ * Decision Engine — Stage-based state machine for structured multi-AI decision making.
+ *
+ * Implements a pipeline: intake → parallel_opinions → conflict_map → user_probe → synthesis → action_export → done
+ *
+ * Each stage enforces strict transitions. Multiple LLMs give independent parallel opinions,
+ * conflicts are mapped via MCDA score divergence, and the user resolves them before synthesis.
+ *
+ * Pure ESM, no external dependencies (Node.js built-in only: fs, path, crypto).
+ */
+
+import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
+import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
+import { dirname, join } from "node:path";
+import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
+
+// ── Constants ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * Ordered stages of a decision session.
+ * @type {readonly string[]}
+ */
+export const DECISION_STAGES = [
+  "intake",            // Problem definition, options, criteria collection
+  "parallel_opinions", // All LLMs give independent opinions (no cross-visibility)
+  "conflict_map",      // Extract disagreements between opinions
+  "user_probe",        // Present conflicts to user, pause for input
+  "synthesis",         // Combine user input + opinions into final decision
+  "action_export",     // Convert decision to actionable output
+  "done",
+];
+
+/**
+ * Valid stage transitions. Each key maps to the single allowed next stage.
+ * @type {Record<string, string>}
+ */
+export const STAGE_TRANSITIONS = {
+  intake: "parallel_opinions",
+  parallel_opinions: "conflict_map",
+  conflict_map: "user_probe",
+  user_probe: "synthesis",
+  synthesis: "action_export",
+  action_export: "done",
+};
+
+/** Score divergence threshold to flag a criterion as a conflict (1-10 scale). */
+const CONFLICT_DIVERGENCE_THRESHOLD = 3;
+
+/** Maximum number of conflicts surfaced to the user to avoid overwhelm. */
+const MAX_CONFLICTS = 5;
+
+// ── Helpers ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+const __dirname = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
+
+/**
+ * Generate a slug from text: lowercase, strip non-alphanumeric, collapse dashes, truncate.
+ * @param {string} text
+ * @param {number} [maxLen=48]
+ * @returns {string}
+ */
+function slugify(text, maxLen = 48) {
+  return (text || "decision")
+    .toLowerCase()
+    .replace(/[^a-z0-9]+/g, "-")
+    .replace(/^-+|-+$/g, "")
+    .slice(0, maxLen) || "decision";
+}
+
+/**
+ * ISO timestamp string.
+ * @returns {string}
+ */
+function now() {
+  return new Date().toISOString();
+}
+
+// ── Core API ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+/**
+ * @typedef {Object} ModelOpinion
+ * @property {string} speaker       - LLM identifier
+ * @property {string} summary       - 1-line conclusion
+ * @property {string} reasoning     - Full reasoning text
+ * @property {Record<string, number>} scores - MCDA scores per criterion (1-10)
+ * @property {string} recommendation - Which option the model recommends
+ * @property {number} confidence    - 0-1 confidence value
+ * @property {string} timestamp     - ISO timestamp
+ */
+
+/**
+ * @typedef {Object} ConflictItem
+ * @property {string} id            - conflict-{index}
+ * @property {string} criterion     - Which criterion the conflict is about
+ * @property {Record<string, string>} positions - speaker -> their position text
+ * @property {Record<string, number>} scores    - speaker -> their score
+ * @property {number} divergence    - Score spread (max - min)
+ * @property {string} question      - Auto-generated clarifying question for user
+ */
+
+/**
+ * @typedef {Object} ActionPlan
+ * @property {string} decision      - The final decision
+ * @property {string} rationale     - Why this decision was made
+ * @property {Array<{id: string, title: string, description: string, priority: string}>} actionItems
+ * @property {Array<{description: string, mitigation: string, probability: string}>} risks
+ * @property {{checklist: string, githubIssue: string}} exportFormats
+ */
+
+/**
+ * @typedef {Object} DecisionSession
+ * @property {string} id
+ * @property {"decision"} type
+ * @property {string} stage
+ * @property {"active"|"completed"|"cancelled"} status
+ * @property {string} problem
+ * @property {string[]} options
+ * @property {string[]} criteria
+ * @property {string|null} template
+ * @property {string[]} speakers
+ * @property {Array} participant_profiles
+ * @property {Record<string, ModelOpinion>} opinions
+ * @property {ConflictItem[]} conflicts
+ * @property {Array} userProbeResponses
+ * @property {string|null} synthesis
+ * @property {ActionPlan|null} actionPlan
+ * @property {Array} log
+ * @property {{created: string, updated: string, participants: number, template: string|null}} metadata
+ */
+
+/**
+ * Create a new decision session.
+ *
+ * @param {Object} params
+ * @param {string} params.problem      - The decision question
+ * @param {string[]} [params.options]  - Available choices (can be empty)
+ * @param {string[]} [params.criteria] - Evaluation criteria
+ * @param {string[]} params.speakers   - Participating LLMs
+ * @param {string|null} [params.template] - Template name if used
+ * @param {Array} [params.participant_profiles] - Same format as deliberation
+ * @returns {DecisionSession}
+ */
+export function createDecisionSession({
+  problem,
+  options = [],
+  criteria = [],
+  speakers = [],
+  template = null,
+  participant_profiles = [],
+}) {
+  if (!problem || typeof problem !== "string") {
+    throw new Error("problem is required and must be a non-empty string");
+  }
+  if (!Array.isArray(speakers) || speakers.length === 0) {
+    throw new Error("speakers must be a non-empty array");
+  }
+
+  const id = `decision-${slugify(problem)}-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}`;
+  const timestamp = now();
+
+  return {
+    id,
+    type: "decision",
+    stage: "intake",
+    status: "active",
+    problem,
+    options: Array.isArray(options) ? [...options] : [],
+    criteria: Array.isArray(criteria) ? [...criteria] : [],
+    template: template || null,
+    speakers: [...speakers],
+    participant_profiles: Array.isArray(participant_profiles) ? [...participant_profiles] : [],
+    opinions: {},
+    conflicts: [],
+    userProbeResponses: [],
+    synthesis: null,
+    actionPlan: null,
+    log: [],
+    metadata: {
+      created: timestamp,
+      updated: timestamp,
+      participants: speakers.length,
+      template: template || null,
+    },
+  };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Advance a decision session to the next stage.
+ *
+ * Validates the current stage has a valid transition, updates the session in place,
+ * appends a log entry, and returns the session.
+ *
+ * @param {DecisionSession} session
+ * @returns {DecisionSession} The updated session
+ * @throws {Error} If current stage has no valid transition or session is not active
+ */
+export function advanceStage(session) {
+  if (!session || typeof session !== "object") {
+    throw new Error("session is required");
+  }
+  if (session.status !== "active") {
+    throw new Error(`Cannot advance: session status is "${session.status}", expected "active"`);
+  }
+
+  const nextStage = STAGE_TRANSITIONS[session.stage];
+  if (!nextStage) {
+    throw new Error(`No valid transition from stage "${session.stage}"`);
+  }
+
+  const prevStage = session.stage;
+  session.stage = nextStage;
+  session.metadata.updated = now();
+
+  if (nextStage === "done") {
+    session.status = "completed";
+  }
+
+  session.log.push({
+    event: "stage_transition",
+    from: prevStage,
+    to: nextStage,
+    timestamp: now(),
+  });
+
+  return session;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Build a conflict map from model opinions and evaluation criteria.
+ *
+ * For each criterion, collects scores from all opinions, calculates divergence,
+ * and flags criteria with divergence >= CONFLICT_DIVERGENCE_THRESHOLD as conflicts.
+ * Returns top MAX_CONFLICTS conflicts sorted by divergence descending.
+ *
+ * @param {Record<string, ModelOpinion>} opinions - speaker -> opinion
+ * @param {string[]} criteria - List of evaluation criteria
+ * @returns {ConflictItem[]}
+ */
+export function buildConflictMap(opinions, criteria) {
+  if (!opinions || typeof opinions !== "object") return [];
+  if (!Array.isArray(criteria) || criteria.length === 0) return [];
+
+  const speakerNames = Object.keys(opinions);
+  if (speakerNames.length < 2) return [];
+
+  const conflicts = [];
+
+  for (const criterion of criteria) {
+    const scores = {};
+    const positions = {};
+    let hasScores = false;
+
+    for (const speaker of speakerNames) {
+      const opinion = opinions[speaker];
+      if (!opinion) continue;
+
+      // Collect score for this criterion
+      const score = opinion.scores?.[criterion];
+      if (typeof score === "number" && score >= 1 && score <= 10) {
+        scores[speaker] = score;
+        hasScores = true;
+      }
+
+      // Extract position text: use reasoning or summary as fallback
+      positions[speaker] = extractPositionForCriterion(opinion, criterion);
+    }
+
+    if (!hasScores) continue;
+
+    const scoreValues = Object.values(scores);
+    if (scoreValues.length < 2) continue;
+
+    const maxScore = Math.max(...scoreValues);
+    const minScore = Math.min(...scoreValues);
+    const divergence = maxScore - minScore;
+
+    if (divergence >= CONFLICT_DIVERGENCE_THRESHOLD) {
+      // Find the speakers at max and min for the question
+      const maxSpeaker = speakerNames.find(s => scores[s] === maxScore) || speakerNames[0];
+      const minSpeaker = speakerNames.find(s => scores[s] === minScore) || speakerNames[1];
+
+      const question =
+        `Models disagree on "${criterion}": ` +
+        `${maxSpeaker} says "${truncate(positions[maxSpeaker], 80)}" (score: ${scores[maxSpeaker]}), ` +
+        `${minSpeaker} says "${truncate(positions[minSpeaker], 80)}" (score: ${scores[minSpeaker]}). ` +
+        `Which perspective aligns more with your priorities?`;
+
+      conflicts.push({
+        id: `conflict-${conflicts.length}`,
+        criterion,
+        positions,
+        scores,
+        divergence,
+        question,
+      });
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Sort by divergence descending, cap at MAX_CONFLICTS
+  conflicts.sort((a, b) => b.divergence - a.divergence);
+  const topConflicts = conflicts.slice(0, MAX_CONFLICTS);
+
+  // Re-index IDs after sorting/slicing
+  for (let i = 0; i < topConflicts.length; i++) {
+    topConflicts[i].id = `conflict-${i}`;
+  }
+
+  return topConflicts;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Extract a speaker's position text for a given criterion from their opinion.
+ * Searches reasoning for a sentence mentioning the criterion, falls back to summary.
+ *
+ * @param {ModelOpinion} opinion
+ * @param {string} criterion
+ * @returns {string}
+ */
+function extractPositionForCriterion(opinion, criterion) {
+  if (!opinion) return "(no opinion)";
+
+  const reasoning = opinion.reasoning || "";
+  const criterionLower = criterion.toLowerCase();
+
+  // Try to find a sentence in reasoning that mentions the criterion
+  const sentences = reasoning.split(/[.!?]\s+/);
+  for (const sentence of sentences) {
+    if (sentence.toLowerCase().includes(criterionLower)) {
+      return sentence.trim();
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Fall back to summary
+  return opinion.summary || opinion.recommendation || "(no position stated)";
+}
+
+/**
+ * Truncate text to maxLen, appending "..." if truncated.
+ * @param {string} text
+ * @param {number} maxLen
+ * @returns {string}
+ */
+function truncate(text, maxLen) {
+  if (!text) return "";
+  if (text.length <= maxLen) return text;
+  return text.slice(0, maxLen - 3) + "...";
+}
+
+/**
+ * Parse a raw LLM response into a structured ModelOpinion.
+ *
+ * Handles both structured (markdown headers + score lines) and unstructured responses.
+ * Looks for "## Summary", "## Recommendation", score patterns "Criterion: N/10", confidence "Confidence: X%".
+ *
+ * @param {string} speaker  - Speaker identifier
+ * @param {string} content  - Raw LLM response text
+ * @param {string[]} criteria - Expected criteria list
+ * @returns {ModelOpinion}
+ */
+export function parseOpinionFromResponse(speaker, content, criteria) {
+  if (!content || typeof content !== "string") {
+    return {
+      speaker,
+      summary: "(empty response)",
+      reasoning: "",
+      scores: {},
+      recommendation: "",
+      confidence: 0.5,
+      timestamp: now(),
+    };
+  }
+
+  const lines = content.split("\n");
+
+  // Extract sections by markdown headers
+  const sections = {};
+  let currentSection = "__preamble";
+  const sectionLines = { __preamble: [] };
+
+  for (const line of lines) {
+    const headerMatch = line.match(/^#{1,3}\s+(.+)/);
+    if (headerMatch) {
+      currentSection = headerMatch[1].trim().toLowerCase();
+      sectionLines[currentSection] = [];
+    } else {
+      if (!sectionLines[currentSection]) sectionLines[currentSection] = [];
+      sectionLines[currentSection].push(line);
+    }
+  }
+
+  for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(sectionLines)) {
+    sections[key] = value.join("\n").trim();
+  }
+
+  // Extract summary
+  const summary =
+    sections["summary"] ||
+    sections["recommendation"] ||
+    sections["conclusion"] ||
+    extractFirstNonEmpty(lines, 120);
+
+  // Extract recommendation
+  const recommendation =
+    sections["recommendation"] ||
+    sections["decision"] ||
+    sections["conclusion"] ||
+    "";
+
+  // Extract reasoning
+  const reasoning =
+    sections["reasoning"] ||
+    sections["analysis"] ||
+    sections["rationale"] ||
+    content;
+
+  // Extract scores per criterion
+  const scores = {};
+  if (Array.isArray(criteria)) {
+    for (const criterion of criteria) {
+      const score = extractScoreForCriterion(content, criterion);
+      if (score !== null) {
+        scores[criterion] = score;
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Extract confidence
+  const confidence = extractConfidence(content);
+
+  return {
+    speaker,
+    summary: truncate(summary, 200),
+    reasoning,
+    scores,
+    recommendation: truncate(recommendation, 200),
+    confidence,
+    timestamp: now(),
+  };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Extract a numeric score (1-10) for a given criterion from text.
+ * Handles patterns: "Criterion: N/10", "Criterion: N", "- Criterion — N/10", etc.
+ *
+ * @param {string} text
+ * @param {string} criterion
+ * @returns {number|null}
+ */
+function extractScoreForCriterion(text, criterion) {
+  if (!text || !criterion) return null;
+
+  // Escape special regex chars in criterion name
+  const escaped = criterion.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, "\\$&");
+
+  // Pattern variants:
+  //   Criterion: 8/10
+  //   Criterion: 8
+  //   - Criterion — 8/10
+  //   **Criterion**: 8
+  //   | Criterion | 8 |
+  const patterns = [
+    new RegExp(`(?:^|[\\-*|])\\s*(?:\\*\\*)?${escaped}(?:\\*\\*)?\\s*[:—|]\\s*(\\d{1,2})(?:\\/10)?`, "im"),
+    new RegExp(`${escaped}[^\\d]{0,20}(\\d{1,2})(?:\\/10|\\s*(?:out of|of)\\s*10)?`, "im"),
+  ];
+
+  for (const pattern of patterns) {
+    const match = text.match(pattern);
+    if (match) {
+      const num = parseInt(match[1], 10);
+      if (num >= 1 && num <= 10) return num;
+    }
+  }
+
+  return null;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Extract confidence value (0-1) from text.
+ * Handles: "Confidence: 85%", "Confidence: 0.85", "confidence level: high"
+ *
+ * @param {string} text
+ * @returns {number}
+ */
+function extractConfidence(text) {
+  if (!text) return 0.5;
+
+  // Percentage pattern: "Confidence: 85%" or "confidence level: 85%"
+  const pctMatch = text.match(/confidence[^:]*:\s*(\d{1,3})\s*%/i);
+  if (pctMatch) {
+    const pct = parseInt(pctMatch[1], 10);
+    if (pct >= 0 && pct <= 100) return pct / 100;
+  }
+
+  // Decimal pattern: "Confidence: 0.85"
+  const decMatch = text.match(/confidence[^:]*:\s*(0?\.\d+|1\.0?)/i);
+  if (decMatch) {
+    const val = parseFloat(decMatch[1]);
+    if (val >= 0 && val <= 1) return val;
+  }
+
+  // Keyword pattern
+  const lower = text.toLowerCase();
+  if (/confidence[^.]*\b(very\s+high|extremely\s+high)\b/i.test(lower)) return 0.95;
+  if (/confidence[^.]*\bhigh\b/i.test(lower)) return 0.85;
+  if (/confidence[^.]*\bmedium\b/i.test(lower)) return 0.65;
+  if (/confidence[^.]*\blow\b/i.test(lower)) return 0.35;
+  if (/confidence[^.]*\bvery\s+low\b/i.test(lower)) return 0.15;
+
+  return 0.5; // default mid-confidence
+}
+
+/**
+ * Return the first non-empty, non-header line from an array, truncated.
+ * @param {string[]} lines
+ * @param {number} maxLen
+ * @returns {string}
+ */
+function extractFirstNonEmpty(lines, maxLen) {
+  for (const line of lines) {
+    const trimmed = line.trim();
+    if (trimmed && !trimmed.startsWith("#")) {
+      return truncate(trimmed, maxLen);
+    }
+  }
+  return "";
+}
+
+/**
+ * Build the prompt sent to each LLM for independent opinion extraction.
+ *
+ * The prompt clearly states the problem, lists options and criteria,
+ * and requests a structured response. Does NOT include any other model's opinion.
+ *
+ * @param {string} problem   - The decision question
+ * @param {string[]} options - Available choices
+ * @param {string[]} criteria - Evaluation criteria
+ * @param {string|null} [template] - Template name (for context)
+ * @returns {string}
+ */
+export function buildOpinionPrompt(problem, options, criteria, template = null) {
+  const parts = [];
+
+  parts.push("You are participating in a structured decision-making process.");
+  parts.push("Give your INDEPENDENT opinion. Do NOT reference other models or prior opinions.\n");
+
+  parts.push(`## Decision Problem\n${problem}\n`);
+
+  if (Array.isArray(options) && options.length > 0) {
+    parts.push("## Available Options");
+    for (let i = 0; i < options.length; i++) {
+      parts.push(`${i + 1}. ${options[i]}`);
+    }
+    parts.push("");
+  }
+
+  if (Array.isArray(criteria) && criteria.length > 0) {
+    parts.push("## Evaluation Criteria");
+    parts.push("Score each criterion from 1 (worst) to 10 (best) for your recommended option.\n");
+    for (const c of criteria) {
+      parts.push(`- ${c}`);
+    }
+    parts.push("");
+  }
+
+  if (template) {
+    parts.push(`*Using decision template: ${template}*\n`);
+  }
+
+  parts.push("## Required Response Format\n");
+  parts.push("Please structure your response with these sections:\n");
+  parts.push("### Summary");
+  parts.push("(1-2 sentence conclusion)\n");
+  parts.push("### Recommendation");
+  parts.push("(Which option you recommend and why)\n");
+
+  if (Array.isArray(criteria) && criteria.length > 0) {
+    parts.push("### Scores");
+    for (const c of criteria) {
+      parts.push(`- ${c}: ?/10`);
+    }
+    parts.push("");
+  }
+
+  parts.push("### Reasoning");
+  parts.push("(Detailed analysis supporting your recommendation)\n");
+  parts.push("### Confidence");
+  parts.push("(Your confidence level as a percentage, e.g., Confidence: 80%)");
+
+  return parts.join("\n");
+}
+
+/**
+ * Generate formatted markdown presenting conflicts to the user with numbered questions.
+ *
+ * @param {ConflictItem[]} conflicts
+ * @returns {string}
+ */
+export function generateConflictQuestions(conflicts) {
+  if (!Array.isArray(conflicts) || conflicts.length === 0) {
+    return "No significant conflicts detected between model opinions. Proceeding to synthesis.";
+  }
+
+  const parts = [];
+  parts.push("# Decision Conflicts Requiring Your Input\n");
+  parts.push(`The participating models disagree on **${conflicts.length}** key area${conflicts.length > 1 ? "s" : ""}.\n`);
+  parts.push("Please review each conflict and share your perspective:\n");
+  parts.push("---\n");
+
+  for (let i = 0; i < conflicts.length; i++) {
+    const c = conflicts[i];
+    parts.push(`## Conflict ${i + 1}: ${c.criterion}`);
+    parts.push(`**Divergence score:** ${c.divergence}/10\n`);
+
+    // Show each speaker's position and score
+    const speakers = Object.keys(c.scores);
+    for (const speaker of speakers) {
+      const score = c.scores[speaker];
+      const position = c.positions?.[speaker] || "(no position)";
+      parts.push(`- **${speaker}** (score: ${score}/10): ${truncate(position, 150)}`);
+    }
+
+    parts.push("");
+    parts.push(`**Question ${i + 1}:** ${c.question}\n`);
+    parts.push("---\n");
+  }
+
+  parts.push("Please respond with your preference for each numbered question.");
+
+  return parts.join("\n");
+}
+
+/**
+ * Build a synthesis report from a complete decision session.
+ *
+ * Combines opinions, conflicts, and user probe responses into
+ * an executive summary, criteria breakdown, and conflict resolution summary.
+ *
+ * @param {DecisionSession} session
+ * @returns {string} Markdown synthesis report
+ */
+export function buildSynthesis(session) {
+  if (!session || typeof session !== "object") {
+    return "Error: invalid session";
+  }
+
+  const parts = [];
+  const opinions = session.opinions || {};
+  const conflicts = session.conflicts || [];
+  const userResponses = session.userProbeResponses || [];
+  const speakerNames = Object.keys(opinions);
+
+  // ── Executive Summary ──
+  parts.push("# Decision Synthesis Report\n");
+  parts.push(`**Problem:** ${session.problem}\n`);
+
+  // Determine consensus recommendation
+  const recommendationCounts = {};
+  for (const opinion of Object.values(opinions)) {
+    const rec = opinion.recommendation || "(none)";
+    recommendationCounts[rec] = (recommendationCounts[rec] || 0) + 1;
+  }
+  const sortedRecs = Object.entries(recommendationCounts).sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1]);
+  const topRec = sortedRecs[0];
+
+  if (topRec) {
+    const unanimity = topRec[1] === speakerNames.length ? "unanimous" : `${topRec[1]}/${speakerNames.length}`;
+    parts.push(`**Consensus recommendation:** ${topRec[0]} (${unanimity} agreement)\n`);
+  }
+
+  // Average confidence
+  const confidences = Object.values(opinions).map(o => o.confidence).filter(c => typeof c === "number");
+  if (confidences.length > 0) {
+    const avgConf = confidences.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0) / confidences.length;
+    parts.push(`**Average confidence:** ${Math.round(avgConf * 100)}%\n`);
+  }
+
+  // ── Individual Summaries ──
+  parts.push("## Model Opinions\n");
+  for (const speaker of speakerNames) {
+    const op = opinions[speaker];
+    parts.push(`### ${speaker}`);
+    parts.push(`- **Recommendation:** ${op.recommendation || "(none)"}`);
+    parts.push(`- **Summary:** ${op.summary || "(none)"}`);
+    parts.push(`- **Confidence:** ${Math.round((op.confidence || 0.5) * 100)}%`);
+    parts.push("");
+  }
+
+  // ── Criteria Breakdown Table ──
+  if (Array.isArray(session.criteria) && session.criteria.length > 0 && speakerNames.length > 0) {
+    parts.push("## Criteria Scores\n");
+
+    // Table header
+    const header = `| Criterion | ${speakerNames.join(" | ")} | Avg |`;
+    const separator = `|${"-".repeat(11)}|${speakerNames.map(() => "-".repeat(7)).join("|")}|${"-".repeat(6)}|`;
+    parts.push(header);
+    parts.push(separator);
+
+    for (const criterion of session.criteria) {
+      const scores = speakerNames.map(s => opinions[s]?.scores?.[criterion]);
+      const validScores = scores.filter(s => typeof s === "number");
+      const avg = validScores.length > 0
+        ? (validScores.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0) / validScores.length).toFixed(1)
+        : "—";
+      const row = `| ${truncate(criterion, 30)} | ${scores.map(s => (typeof s === "number" ? String(s) : "—")).join(" | ")} | ${avg} |`;
+      parts.push(row);
+    }
+    parts.push("");
+  }
+
+  // ── Conflict Resolution ──
+  if (conflicts.length > 0) {
+    parts.push("## Conflict Resolution\n");
+    for (let i = 0; i < conflicts.length; i++) {
+      const c = conflicts[i];
+      const userResponse = userResponses[i] || "(no response)";
+      parts.push(`### ${c.criterion} (divergence: ${c.divergence})`);
+      parts.push(`- **User's resolution:** ${userResponse}`);
+      parts.push("");
+    }
+  } else {
+    parts.push("## Conflicts\n");
+    parts.push("No significant conflicts were detected.\n");
+  }
+
+  return parts.join("\n");
+}
+
+/**
+ * Convert a decision session's synthesis into an actionable plan.
+ *
+ * @param {DecisionSession} session
+ * @returns {ActionPlan}
+ */
+export function buildActionPlan(session) {
+  if (!session || typeof session !== "object") {
+    return {
+      decision: "(no session)",
+      rationale: "",
+      actionItems: [],
+      risks: [],
+      exportFormats: { checklist: "", githubIssue: "" },
+    };
+  }
+
+  const opinions = session.opinions || {};
+  const speakerNames = Object.keys(opinions);
+
+  // Determine the winning recommendation
+  const recommendationCounts = {};
+  for (const opinion of Object.values(opinions)) {
+    const rec = opinion.recommendation || "";
+    if (rec) recommendationCounts[rec] = (recommendationCounts[rec] || 0) + 1;
+  }
+  const sortedRecs = Object.entries(recommendationCounts).sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1]);
+  const decision = sortedRecs[0]?.[0] || session.problem;
+
+  // Build rationale from consensus + user input
+  const rationale = buildRationale(session, decision);
+
+  // Generate action items from the decision and criteria
+  const actionItems = generateActionItems(session, decision);
+
+  // Generate risks from low-scored criteria and conflicts
+  const risks = generateRisks(session);
+
+  // Export formats
+  const checklist = buildChecklist(decision, actionItems);
+  const githubIssue = buildGithubIssue(session, decision, rationale, actionItems, risks);
+
+  return {
+    decision,
+    rationale,
+    actionItems,
+    risks,
+    exportFormats: {
+      checklist,
+      githubIssue,
+    },
+  };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Build rationale text from session data.
+ * @param {DecisionSession} session
+ * @param {string} decision
+ * @returns {string}
+ */
+function buildRationale(session, decision) {
+  const parts = [];
+  const opinions = session.opinions || {};
+  const speakerNames = Object.keys(opinions);
+
+  // Count agreement
+  const agreeing = speakerNames.filter(s => {
+    const rec = opinions[s]?.recommendation || "";
+    return rec.toLowerCase().includes(decision.toLowerCase().slice(0, 20));
+  });
+
+  if (agreeing.length > 0) {
+    parts.push(`${agreeing.length}/${speakerNames.length} models recommended this approach.`);
+  }
+
+  // User resolutions
+  if (session.userProbeResponses && session.userProbeResponses.length > 0) {
+    parts.push("User input was incorporated for conflict resolution.");
+  }
+
+  // Average confidence
+  const confidences = Object.values(opinions).map(o => o.confidence).filter(c => typeof c === "number");
+  if (confidences.length > 0) {
+    const avg = confidences.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0) / confidences.length;
+    parts.push(`Average model confidence: ${Math.round(avg * 100)}%.`);
+  }
+
+  return parts.join(" ") || "Decision based on multi-model deliberation.";
+}
+
+/**
+ * Generate action items from session data.
+ * @param {DecisionSession} session
+ * @param {string} decision
+ * @returns {Array<{id: string, title: string, description: string, priority: string}>}
+ */
+function generateActionItems(session, decision) {
+  const items = [];
+
+  // Primary action: implement the decision
+  items.push({
+    id: "action-0",
+    title: `Implement: ${truncate(decision, 60)}`,
+    description: `Execute the decided approach: ${decision}`,
+    priority: "high",
+  });
+
+  // For each criterion, create a monitoring/validation action
+  const criteria = session.criteria || [];
+  for (let i = 0; i < criteria.length && i < 5; i++) {
+    items.push({
+      id: `action-${i + 1}`,
+      title: `Validate: ${truncate(criteria[i], 60)}`,
+      description: `Ensure the implementation satisfies the "${criteria[i]}" criterion`,
+      priority: i < 2 ? "medium" : "low",
+    });
+  }
+
+  return items;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Generate risk items from low scores and conflicts.
+ * @param {DecisionSession} session
+ * @returns {Array<{description: string, mitigation: string, probability: string}>}
+ */
+function generateRisks(session) {
+  const risks = [];
+  const opinions = session.opinions || {};
+  const conflicts = session.conflicts || [];
+  const criteria = session.criteria || [];
+
+  // Risks from high-divergence conflicts
+  for (const conflict of conflicts) {
+    risks.push({
+      description: `Disagreement on "${conflict.criterion}" (divergence: ${conflict.divergence}/10)`,
+      mitigation: `Monitor and re-evaluate if assumptions about "${conflict.criterion}" change`,
+      probability: conflict.divergence >= 6 ? "high" : "medium",
+    });
+  }
+
+  // Risks from criteria with low average scores
+  for (const criterion of criteria) {
+    const scores = Object.values(opinions)
+      .map(o => o.scores?.[criterion])
+      .filter(s => typeof s === "number");
+    if (scores.length === 0) continue;
+
+    const avg = scores.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0) / scores.length;
+    if (avg <= 4) {
+      risks.push({
+        description: `Low confidence in "${criterion}" (avg score: ${avg.toFixed(1)}/10)`,
+        mitigation: `Investigate alternatives or mitigations for "${criterion}"`,
+        probability: avg <= 2 ? "high" : "medium",
+      });
+    }
+  }
+
+  return risks.slice(0, 8); // Cap at 8 risks
+}
+
+/**
+ * Build a markdown checklist from action items.
+ * @param {string} decision
+ * @param {Array<{id: string, title: string, description: string, priority: string}>} actionItems
+ * @returns {string}
+ */
+function buildChecklist(decision, actionItems) {
+  const parts = [];
+  parts.push(`# Decision Checklist: ${truncate(decision, 60)}\n`);
+  for (const item of actionItems) {
+    const priorityTag = item.priority === "high" ? " [HIGH]" : item.priority === "medium" ? " [MED]" : "";
+    parts.push(`- [ ]${priorityTag} ${item.title}`);
+    if (item.description) {
+      parts.push(`  - ${item.description}`);
+    }
+  }
+  return parts.join("\n");
+}
+
+/**
+ * Build a GitHub issue body from session data.
+ * @param {DecisionSession} session
+ * @param {string} decision
+ * @param {string} rationale
+ * @param {Array} actionItems
+ * @param {Array} risks
+ * @returns {string}
+ */
+function buildGithubIssue(session, decision, rationale, actionItems, risks) {
+  const parts = [];
+
+  parts.push(`## Decision: ${decision}\n`);
+  parts.push(`**Problem:** ${session.problem}\n`);
+  parts.push(`**Rationale:** ${rationale}\n`);
+
+  if (actionItems.length > 0) {
+    parts.push("### Action Items\n");
+    for (const item of actionItems) {
+      parts.push(`- [ ] **[${item.priority.toUpperCase()}]** ${item.title}: ${item.description}`);
+    }
+    parts.push("");
+  }
+
+  if (risks.length > 0) {
+    parts.push("### Risks\n");
+    for (const risk of risks) {
+      parts.push(`- **[${risk.probability.toUpperCase()}]** ${risk.description}`);
+      parts.push(`  - Mitigation: ${risk.mitigation}`);
+    }
+    parts.push("");
+  }
+
+  parts.push("---");
+  parts.push(`*Generated by aigentry-deliberation decision engine*`);
+
+  return parts.join("\n");
+}
+
+/**
+ * Load decision templates from the selectors directory.
+ * Returns an empty array if the file does not exist or is invalid.
+ *
+ * @returns {Array<{name: string, description: string, criteria: string[], options?: string[], keywords?: string[]}>}
+ */
+export function loadTemplates() {
+  const templatePath = join(__dirname, "selectors", "decision-templates.json");
+  try {
+    const raw = readFileSync(templatePath, "utf-8");
+    const parsed = JSON.parse(raw);
+    return Array.isArray(parsed) ? parsed : [];
+  } catch {
+    return [];
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Match a template to a problem description using keyword matching.
+ *
+ * Scores each template by counting keyword hits in the problem text.
+ * Returns the best-matching template, or null if no template matches.
+ *
+ * @param {string} problemText - The decision problem description
+ * @param {Array<{name: string, keywords?: string[], description?: string}>} templates
+ * @returns {{name: string, description: string, criteria: string[], options?: string[], keywords?: string[]}|null}
+ */
+export function matchTemplate(problemText, templates) {
+  if (!problemText || !Array.isArray(templates) || templates.length === 0) {
+    return null;
+  }
+
+  const lower = problemText.toLowerCase();
+  let bestMatch = null;
+  let bestScore = 0;
+
+  for (const template of templates) {
+    let score = 0;
+    const keywords = template.keywords || [];
+
+    for (const keyword of keywords) {
+      if (lower.includes(keyword.toLowerCase())) {
+        score++;
+      }
+    }
+
+    // Also match against template name and description
+    if (template.name && lower.includes(template.name.toLowerCase())) {
+      score += 2;
+    }
+
+    if (score > bestScore) {
+      bestScore = score;
+      bestMatch = template;
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Require at least 1 keyword match
+  return bestScore >= 1 ? bestMatch : null;
+}

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@dmsdc-ai/aigentry-deliberation",
-  "version": "0.0.26",
+  "version": "0.0.27",
   "description": "MCP Deliberation Server — Multi-session AI deliberation with smart speaker ordering and persona roles",
   "type": "module",
   "license": "MIT",
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
   },
   "files": [
     "index.js",
+    "decision-engine.js",
     "model-router.js",
     "install.js",
     "doctor.js",