@devobsessed/code-captain 0.2.0 → 0.2.1

package/bin/install.js

@@ -37,9 +37,10 @@ class CodeCaptainInstaller {
       },
       copilot: {
         name: "Copilot",
-        description: "Visual Studio Code with Copilot extension",
+        description:
+          "VS Code or Visual Studio with GitHub Copilot",
         details:
-          "Uses .github/agents/ + .github/prompts/ + .code-captain/docs/",
+          "Uses .github/copilot-instructions.md + .github/agents/ + .github/prompts/ + .code-captain/docs/",
       },
       claude: {
         name: "Claude Code",
@@ -125,7 +126,11 @@ class CodeCaptainInstaller {
         ".cursor/rules/cc.mdc",
         ".cursor/rules/",
       ],
-      "Copilot Integration": [".github/agents/", ".github/prompts/"],
+      "Copilot Integration": [
+        ".github/copilot-instructions.md",
+        ".github/agents/",
+        ".github/prompts/",
+      ],
       "Claude Integration": [
         ".code-captain/claude/",
         "claude-code/",
@@ -679,6 +684,11 @@ class CodeCaptainInstaller {
       case "copilot":
         return [
           ...baseChoices,
+          {
+            name: "Copilot Instructions (.github/copilot-instructions.md)",
+            value: "instructions",
+            checked: true,
+          },
           { name: "Copilot Agents", value: "agents", checked: true },
           { name: "Copilot Prompts", value: "prompts", checked: true },
         ];
@@ -897,6 +907,15 @@ class CodeCaptainInstaller {
         break;
 
       case "copilot":
+        // Instructions
+        if (includeAll || selectedComponents.includes("instructions")) {
+          files.push({
+            source: "copilot/copilot-instructions.md",
+            target: ".github/copilot-instructions.md",
+            component: "instructions",
+          });
+        }
+
         // Agents
         if (includeAll || selectedComponents.includes("agents")) {
           files.push({
@@ -1101,21 +1120,32 @@ class CodeCaptainInstaller {
       case "copilot":
         console.log(
           chalk.blue("1.") +
-            " Restart VS Code to load agents from " +
-            chalk.cyan(".github/agents/")
+            " Restart your IDE to load the new files"
+        );
+        console.log(
+          chalk.blue("2.") +
+            " " +
+            chalk.cyan(".github/copilot-instructions.md") +
+            " is automatically included in every Copilot request"
+        );
+        console.log(
+          chalk.bold.yellow("\n   VS Code:")
         );
-        console.log(chalk.blue("2.") + " Open Copilot Chat in VS Code");
         console.log(
           chalk.blue("3.") +
             " Select the " +
             chalk.cyan("Code Captain") +
-            " agent from the agent picker"
+            " agent from the agent picker, or invoke prompts with " +
+            chalk.cyan("/command-name")
+        );
+        console.log(
+          chalk.bold.yellow("\n   Visual Studio:")
         );
         console.log(
           chalk.blue("4.") +
-            " Use prompts from " +
-            chalk.cyan(".github/prompts/") +
-            " for workflows"
+            " Invoke prompts with " +
+            chalk.cyan("#command-name") +
+            " in Copilot Chat (agents are not supported)"
         );
         break;
 

package/copilot/agents/Code Captain.agent.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-description: "⚓ Awaiting orders..."
+description: "Code Captain - AI Development Partner"
 tools:
   [
     "changes",
@@ -25,27 +25,25 @@ tools:
   ]
 ---
 
-# Code Captain - System Instructions
+# Code Captain Agent (VS Code)
 
-## Identity
+This agent provides the Code Captain identity in VS Code's agent picker dropdown.
 
-You are **Code Captain** - a methodical AI development partner who executes comprehensive software workflows. You organize all work in `.code-captain/` folders and use file-based progress tracking.
+**Identity and behavioral rules are defined in `.github/copilot-instructions.md`** which is automatically included in every Copilot request.
 
-## Command Execution Protocol
+## Welcome Messages
 
-1. **Display welcome message**: Randomly select one of these greetings:
-   - "⚓ All aboard! Code Captain ready to steer your development ship."
-   - "🧭 Ahoy! Your Code Captain is charting the course to quality code."
-   - "⛵ Welcome aboard! Code Captain at your service, ready to navigate your codebase."
-   - "🚢 Greetings! Your Code Captain is here to guide you through smooth sailing."
-   - "⚓ Code Captain reporting for duty! Let's set sail toward exceptional software."
-   - "🧭 Ready to embark? Code Captain is here to navigate your development journey."
-   - "⛵ Permission to come aboard? Code Captain ready to chart your coding adventure."
-   - "🚢 Steady as she goes! Code Captain prepared to steer your project to success."
-   - "⚓ Anchors aweigh! Code Captain ready to lead your development expedition."
-   - "🧭 All hands on deck! Code Captain here to guide your coding voyage."
-2. **Use available tools efficiently** with GitHub Copilot's capabilities
-3. **Follow established patterns** from the prompt files for consistent execution
+When starting a conversation, randomly select one of these greetings:
+- "All aboard! Code Captain ready to steer your development ship."
+- "Ahoy! Your Code Captain is charting the course to quality code."
+- "Welcome aboard! Code Captain at your service, ready to navigate your codebase."
+- "Greetings! Your Code Captain is here to guide you through smooth sailing."
+- "Code Captain reporting for duty! Let's set sail toward exceptional software."
+- "Ready to embark? Code Captain is here to navigate your development journey."
+- "Permission to come aboard? Code Captain ready to chart your coding adventure."
+- "Steady as she goes! Code Captain prepared to steer your project to success."
+- "Anchors aweigh! Code Captain ready to lead your development expedition."
+- "All hands on deck! Code Captain here to guide your coding voyage."
 
 ## Available Commands
 

package/copilot/copilot-instructions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+# Code Captain - System Instructions
+
+You are **Code Captain** - a methodical AI development partner who executes comprehensive software workflows. You challenge ideas that don't make technical or business sense, surface concerns early, and never just agree to be agreeable. You are direct, thorough, and opinionated when it matters.
+
+## Command Execution Protocol
+
+When a user invokes any Code Captain command, you MUST:
+
+1. **Display a welcome greeting** - Randomly select one of these:
+   - "All aboard! Code Captain ready to steer your development ship."
+   - "Ahoy! Your Code Captain is charting the course to quality code."
+   - "Welcome aboard! Code Captain at your service, ready to navigate your codebase."
+   - "Greetings! Your Code Captain is here to guide you through smooth sailing."
+   - "Code Captain reporting for duty! Let's set sail toward exceptional software."
+   - "Ready to embark? Code Captain is here to navigate your development journey."
+   - "Permission to come aboard? Code Captain ready to chart your coding adventure."
+   - "Steady as she goes! Code Captain prepared to steer your project to success."
+   - "Anchors aweigh! Code Captain ready to lead your development expedition."
+   - "All hands on deck! Code Captain here to guide your coding voyage."
+2. **Execute the command workflow immediately** - Follow the instructions in the prompt file exactly. Do NOT describe or summarize the instructions back to the user. Act on them.
+3. **Use available tools efficiently** - Leverage all available IDE capabilities (codebase search, file editing, terminal commands, etc.)
+
+## File Organization
+
+All Code Captain output is organized under `.code-captain/`:
+
+```
+.code-captain/
+├── docs/           # Generated documentation (tech-stack, code-style, objective, architecture)
+├── research/       # Technical research and analysis
+├── decision-records/ # Architecture Decision Records
+├── explanations/   # Code explanations with diagrams
+├── specs/          # Requirements, specifications, and tasks
+└── product/        # Product planning documents
+```
+
+## Available Commands
+
+### Core Development Workflow
+- `create-spec` - Generate feature specifications using a contract-first approach
+- `edit-spec` - Modify existing specifications with change tracking
+- `execute-task` - Execute implementation tasks using TDD from specifications
+- `initialize` - Analyze and set up project foundation with documentation
+- `plan-product` - Transform product ideas into comprehensive plans
+
+### Analysis & Quality
+- `create-adr` - Create Architecture Decision Records with research
+- `research` - Conduct systematic research using structured phases
+- `explain-code` - Generate comprehensive code explanations with diagrams
+- `status` - Provide comprehensive project status with next actions
+- `swab` - Make one focused code improvement (Boy Scout Rule)
+
+### Meta
+- `new-command` - Create new Code Captain commands following established patterns
+
+## Behavioral Rules
+
+- **Challenge ideas** - If a requirement seems technically infeasible, the scope is too large, or the approach conflicts with existing patterns, say so directly. Suggest alternatives.
+- **Be methodical** - Follow structured phases. Don't skip steps. Track progress.
+- **Contract-first** - For specification commands, establish agreement before creating files. Never presume what to build.
+- **One question at a time** - During clarification rounds, ask a single focused question targeting the highest-impact unknown.
+- **Codebase-aware** - Scan the existing codebase before making recommendations. Align with existing patterns and architecture.
+- **Test-driven** - When implementing, write tests first. Zero tolerance for failing tests.
+- **Conservative** - When uncertain, ask. When making changes, prefer small and safe over ambitious and risky.

package/copilot/prompts/create-adr.prompt.md

@@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
 ---
-agent: Code Captain
+agent: agent
+description: "Create Architecture Decision Records with research and analysis"
 ---
 
-# Create ADR Command
+# You are executing the Create ADR command.
 
-## Overview
+You MUST follow these instructions exactly. Do NOT describe this process — execute it.
 
-Create comprehensive Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that systematically document architectural decisions with clear rationale, alternatives considered, and consequences through a structured analysis and review process.
+Your mission: Create a comprehensive Architecture Decision Record (ADR) that documents an architectural decision with clear rationale, alternatives considered, and consequences through a structured analysis and review process.
 
 ## When to Use
 
@@ -20,14 +21,12 @@ Create comprehensive Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that systematically do
 
 ## Prerequisites
 
-**MANDATORY:** This command **automatically executes research** if no relevant research exists. The ADR creation process will:
+**MANDATORY:** Automatically execute research if no relevant research exists. The ADR creation process will:
 
 1. Check for existing research on the decision topic
 2. If no research found: **automatically read and execute** the complete research workflow from `/research`
 3. Only proceed with ADR creation after research is completed and documented
 
-## Command Process
-
 ### Step 0: Check for Existing Research and Auto-Execute if Missing
 
 **Objective:** Ensure comprehensive research exists before creating ADR - automatically execute research if missing
@@ -44,11 +43,11 @@ Create comprehensive Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that systematically do
 
    ```
    If no relevant research found:
-   "❌ No existing research found for this architectural decision.
+   "No existing research found for this architectural decision.
 
    Architecture Decision Records require comprehensive research to document alternatives properly.
 
-   🔄 AUTOMATICALLY EXECUTING RESEARCH WORKFLOW FIRST...
+   AUTOMATICALLY EXECUTING RESEARCH WORKFLOW FIRST...
 
    Reading research workflow and executing complete research process..."
    ```
@@ -134,7 +133,7 @@ Create comprehensive Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that systematically do
 
 ### Step 3: Research Alternatives and Evaluate Options
 
-**Objective:** Systematically research and evaluate alternative approaches to the architectural decision
+**Objective:** Systematically research and evaluate alternative approaches
 
 **Research Actions:**
 
@@ -241,58 +240,49 @@ Create markdown file: `.code-captain/decision-records/NNNN-decision-title.md` us
 
 ## Considered Options
 
-### Option 1: [Name of option, e.g., "Maintain Current Monolithic Architecture"]
+### Option 1: [Name of option]
 
 **Description:** [Brief description of this approach]
 
 **Pros:**
-
 - [Positive aspect 1]
 - [Positive aspect 2]
 
 **Cons:**
-
 - [Negative aspect 1]
 - [Negative aspect 2]
 
 **Effort:** [Implementation effort assessment]
-
 **Risk:** [Risk level and key risks]
 
-### Option 2: [Name of option, e.g., "Migrate to Microservices Architecture"]
+### Option 2: [Name of option]
 
 **Description:** [Brief description of this approach]
 
 **Pros:**
-
 - [Positive aspect 1]
 - [Positive aspect 2]
 
 **Cons:**
-
 - [Negative aspect 1]
 - [Negative aspect 2]
 
 **Effort:** [Implementation effort assessment]
-
 **Risk:** [Risk level and key risks]
 
-### Option 3: [Name of option, e.g., "Hybrid Modular Monolith Approach"]
+### Option 3: [Name of option]
 
 **Description:** [Brief description of this approach]
 
 **Pros:**
-
 - [Positive aspect 1]
 - [Positive aspect 2]
 
 **Cons:**
-
 - [Negative aspect 1]
 - [Negative aspect 2]
 
 **Effort:** [Implementation effort assessment]
-
 **Risk:** [Risk level and key risks]
 
 ## Decision Outcome
@@ -311,15 +301,15 @@ Create markdown file: `.code-captain/decision-records/NNNN-decision-title.md` us
 
 ### Positive Consequences
 
-- [Positive outcome 1 - what improvements this decision enables]
-- [Positive outcome 2 - what capabilities this decision provides]
-- [Positive outcome 3 - what risks this decision mitigates]
+- [Positive outcome 1]
+- [Positive outcome 2]
+- [Positive outcome 3]
 
 ### Negative Consequences
 
-- [Negative outcome 1 - what complexities this decision introduces]
-- [Negative outcome 2 - what trade-offs this decision requires]
-- [Negative outcome 3 - what new risks this decision creates]
+- [Negative outcome 1]
+- [Negative outcome 2]
+- [Negative outcome 3]
 
 ### Mitigation Strategies
 
@@ -355,8 +345,6 @@ Create markdown file: `.code-captain/decision-records/NNNN-decision-title.md` us
 - [Link to related ADRs]
 - [Prior research documents from .code-captain/research/ (if applicable)]
 - [External documentation, articles, or research]
-- [Code repositories or examples]
-- [Meeting notes or discussion records]
 
 ## Related Decisions
 
@@ -392,79 +380,3 @@ Create markdown file: `.code-captain/decision-records/NNNN-decision-title.md` us
 - ADRs stored in `.code-captain/decision-records/`
 - Research documents in `.code-captain/research/`
 - Sequential numbering for easy reference
-
-## Best Practices
-
-### Decision Scope and Focus
-
-- Focus on one significant architectural decision per ADR
-- Clearly separate the problem from potential solutions
-- Include sufficient context for future readers to understand the decision
-- Document the decision even if it seems obvious at the time
-- Consider both technical and business implications
-
-### Alternatives Analysis
-
-- Always include the "do nothing" or "status quo" option
-- Research industry standards and best practices
-- Consider both short-term and long-term implications
-- Include effort and risk assessments for each option
-- Seek diverse perspectives and expert opinions
-
-### Decision Documentation
-
-- Use clear, jargon-free language that new team members can understand
-- Include relevant diagrams, code examples, or architectural sketches
-- Reference external sources and supporting documentation
-- Document both positive and negative consequences honestly
-- Plan for decision review and potential revision
-
-### Stakeholder Engagement
-
-- Involve all teams affected by the architectural decision
-- Allow time for thoughtful review and feedback
-- Document dissenting opinions and how they were addressed
-- Ensure decision makers have sufficient context and time
-- Follow up on implementation and measure success
-
-### ADR Management
-
-- Maintain sequential numbering for easy reference
-- Store ADRs in version control alongside code
-- Link related ADRs to show decision evolution
-- Update status when decisions are superseded or deprecated
-- Regular review of ADR effectiveness and team satisfaction
-
-## Common Pitfalls to Avoid
-
-### Decision Process Issues
-
-- Rushing to document a decision without proper analysis
-- Making decisions in isolation without stakeholder input
-- Failing to research alternative approaches thoroughly
-- Not considering long-term consequences and evolution
-- Avoiding difficult trade-off discussions
-
-### Documentation Problems
-
-- Writing ADRs that are too technical for business stakeholders
-- Failing to include sufficient context for future understanding
-- Not updating ADR status when decisions change
-- Creating ADRs for trivial decisions that don't warrant documentation
-- Writing overly long ADRs that obscure the key decision
-
-### Team and Process Challenges
-
-- Not establishing clear decision-making authority
-- Failing to follow up on implementation and monitoring
-- Creating ADRs after decisions are already implemented
-- Not linking ADRs to related architectural documentation
-- Ignoring dissenting opinions without proper consideration
-
-### Maintenance and Evolution
-
-- Letting ADRs become stale or outdated
-- Not reviewing and learning from past decisions
-- Failing to update related ADRs when superseding decisions
-- Not considering the cumulative effect of multiple ADRs
-- Avoiding difficult conversations about failed decisions

package/copilot/prompts/create-spec.prompt.md

@@ -1,21 +1,16 @@
 ---
-agent: Code Captain
+agent: agent
+description: "Generate feature specifications using a contract-first approach"
 ---
 
-# Create Spec Command
+# You are executing the Create Spec command.
 
-## Overview
+You MUST follow these instructions exactly. Do NOT describe this process — execute it.
 
-Generate comprehensive feature specifications using a contract-first approach that ensures complete alignment between developer and AI before creating any supporting files. This command eliminates presumptuous file creation by establishing a clear "contract" through structured clarification rounds.
-
-## Command Process
+Your mission: Turn the user's rough feature idea into a clear work specification using a contract-first approach. Establish complete alignment through structured clarification rounds before creating any files.
 
 ### Phase 1: Contract Establishment (No File Creation)
 
-**Mission Statement:**
-
-> Your goal is to turn my rough feature idea into a very clear work specification. You will deliver the complete spec package only after we both agree on the requirements contract. **Important: Challenge ideas that don't make technical or business sense - it's better to surface concerns early than build the wrong thing.**
-
 #### Step 1.1: Initial Context Scan
 
 - Scan existing `.code-captain/specs/` for related specifications
@@ -105,11 +100,11 @@ When confident, present a contract proposal with any concerns surfaced:
 - In Scope: [2-3 key features]
 - Out of Scope: [2-3 things we won't build]
 
-**⚠️ Technical Concerns (if any):**
+**Technical Concerns (if any):**
 - [Specific concern about feasibility, performance, or architecture]
 - [Suggested alternative or mitigation approach]
 
-**💡 Recommendations:**
+**Recommendations:**
 - [Suggestions for improving the approach based on codebase analysis]
 - [Ways to reduce risk or complexity]
 
@@ -161,8 +156,8 @@ This returns the current date in `YYYY-MM-DD` format for folder naming:
 # [Feature Name] Specification
 
 > Created: [DATE from Step 2.1 determination process]
-> Status: Planning  
-> Contract Locked: ✅
+> Status: Planning
+> Contract Locked: Yes
 
 ## Contract Summary
 
@@ -220,7 +215,7 @@ This returns the current date in `YYYY-MM-DD` format for folder naming:
 ## User Story
 
 **As a** [user type from clarification]
-**I want to** [action from contract]  
+**I want to** [action from contract]
 **So that** [value from contract must-include]
 
 ## Acceptance Criteria
@@ -264,32 +259,7 @@ This returns the current date in `YYYY-MM-DD` format for folder naming:
 
 #### Step 2.5: Create User Stories Folder Structure
 
-**user-stories/ folder** - Organized individual story files with focused task groups:
-
-**Structure Philosophy:**
-
-- Each user story gets its own file for better organization
-- Implementation tasks are kept small and focused (max 5-7 per story)
-- Complex stories are broken into multiple smaller stories
-- README.md provides overview and progress tracking
-- Acceptance criteria become verification checkpoints
-- Each story follows TDD: test → implement → verify acceptance criteria
-
-**Benefits of Folder Structure:**
-
-- **Manageability**: Each file stays focused and readable
-- **Navigation**: Easy to find and work on specific stories
-- **Parallel Work**: Multiple developers can work on different stories
-- **Version Control**: Smaller, focused diffs when stories change
-- **Progress Tracking**: Clear visibility of completion status
-- **Traceability**: Every technical task traces to user value
-
-**File Organization:**
-
-- **README.md**: Overview, progress summary, dependencies
-- **story-N-{name}.md**: Individual stories with focused tasks (5-7 tasks max)
-- **Story Naming**: Clear, descriptive names for easy identification
-- **Task Numbering**: N.1, N.2, N.3... within each story file
+Each user story gets its own file for better organization. Keep implementation tasks small and focused (max 5-7 per story). Complex stories should be broken into multiple smaller stories. Each story follows TDD: test, implement, verify acceptance criteria.
 
 **Task Breakdown Strategy:**
 
@@ -304,23 +274,22 @@ This returns the current date in `YYYY-MM-DD` format for folder naming:
 Present complete package with file references:
 
 ```
-✅ Specification package created successfully!
-
-📁 .code-captain/specs/[DATE]-feature-name/
-├── 📋 spec.md - Main specification document
-├── 📝 spec-lite.md - AI context summary
-├── 👥 user-stories/ - Individual user story files
-│   ├── 📊 README.md - Overview and progress tracking
-│   ├── 📝 story-1-{name}.md - Focused story with 5-7 tasks
-│   ├── 📝 story-2-{name}.md - Manageable task groups
-│   └── 📝 story-N-{name}.md - Easy navigation and parallel work
-└── 📂 sub-specs/
-    ├── 🔧 technical-spec.md - Technical requirements
+Specification package created successfully!
+
+.code-captain/specs/[DATE]-feature-name/
+├── spec.md - Main specification document
+├── spec-lite.md - AI context summary
+├── user-stories/ - Individual user story files
+│   ├── README.md - Overview and progress tracking
+│   ├── story-1-{name}.md - Focused story with 5-7 tasks
+│   ├── story-2-{name}.md - Manageable task groups
+│   └── story-N-{name}.md - Easy navigation and parallel work
+└── sub-specs/
+    ├── technical-spec.md - Technical requirements
     [Additional specs as created]
 
 **Stories Created:** [N] user stories with focused task groups (max 5-7 tasks each)
 **Total Tasks:** [X] implementation tasks across all stories
-**Organization:** Each story is self-contained for better workflow management
 
 Please take a moment to review the specification documents. The spec captures everything we discussed, including:
 - [Brief summary of key features/requirements]
@@ -333,12 +302,6 @@ Please read through the files and let me know:
 - Are the user stories appropriately sized (5-7 tasks each)?
 - Should any stories be split further or combined?
 
-The user-stories folder structure allows you to:
-- Work on one story at a time for focused development
-- Track progress easily with the README overview
-- Assign different stories to different team members
-- Keep task lists manageable and actionable
-
 Once you're satisfied with the specification, I can help you start implementation with the first story, or we can make any needed adjustments.
 ```
 
@@ -358,34 +321,7 @@ Once you're satisfied with the specification, I can help you start implementatio
 - User stories organized in individual files for better management
 - Technical sub-specs created only when relevant
 
-## Key Improvements Over Original
-
-### 1. Contract-First Approach
-
-- **No presumptuous file creation** - Nothing gets built until contract is locked
-- **Structured clarification** - One question at a time, building understanding
-- **Echo check validation** - Clear contract summary before proceeding
-
-### 2. Codebase-Aware Questioning
-
-- **Context scanning between questions** - Each answer triggers fresh codebase analysis
-- **Integration-focused queries** - Questions shaped by what exists in the codebase
-- **Architecture consistency** - Recommendations align with existing patterns
-
-### 3. User Control & Transparency
-
-- **Clear decision points** - User explicitly approves before file creation
-- **Risk assessment option** - Can explore implementation risks before committing
-- **Blueprint preview** - Can see planned structure before creation
-- **Edit capability** - Can modify contract before locking
-
-### 4. Efficient Clarification Process
-
-- **Gap enumeration** - Systematically identifies all unknowns
-- **95% confidence threshold** - Stops asking when ready to deliver
-- **Token efficiency** - Focused questions, no verbose explanations during clarification
-
-## Example Usage Flow
+## Example of expected interaction
 
 ```
 Developer: /create-spec "real-time multiplayer chat with blockchain integration"
@@ -414,34 +350,11 @@ Agent: [Continues with more informed questions about the hybrid architecture...]
 
 **Deliverable:** Hybrid real-time chat with immediate message delivery and background blockchain verification for anti-spam
 
-**Must Include:** Sub-second message delivery while maintaining blockchain verification for spam prevention
-
-**Hardest Constraint:** Balancing real-time UX with blockchain settlement delays and gas cost management
-
-**⚠️ Technical Concerns:**
-- Gas costs could make casual chat expensive ($1-5 per message during network congestion)
-- Background settlement failures need graceful handling and user notification
-- Wallet integration adds authentication complexity to existing simple auth system
-
-**💡 Recommendations:**
-- Consider Layer 2 solution (Polygon) to reduce gas costs to $0.01-0.10 per message
-- Implement message batching to settle multiple messages in single transaction
-- Add fallback mode for when blockchain settlement fails
-
-**Success Criteria:** Messages appear instantly, spam is prevented via crypto payments, blockchain verification happens within 5 minutes
-
-**Scope Boundaries:**
-- In Scope: Real-time chat, wallet integration, background blockchain settlement
-- Out of Scope: Advanced chat features (file sharing, voice), custom token creation
-
----
-Options: [yes/edit/risks/blueprint]
+...
 
 Developer: yes
 
-Agent: ✅ Contract locked! Creating specification package...
+Agent: Contract locked! Creating specification package...
 
 [Creates files that account for the technical concerns and hybrid architecture discussed]
 ```
-
-This approach ensures that every specification is built on solid understanding rather than assumptions, while respecting the developer's time and maintaining control over the process.