@deriv-com/dds-marketing 1.0.0 → 1.0.2

package/.llm/components/illustrationscene.md

@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+<!-- GENERATED from illustration-scene.contract.json. Do not edit. -->
+
+# IllustrationScene
+
+A photograph with an IllustrationCard laid over it — the product shown in the hands of the people who use it: a trade ticket over a trader on the move, a balance over someone at a desk. The scene owns how the two meet, so every such picture across a site is composed the same way: the photograph fills one of three shapes, and the glass card sits over it at a fixed share of the frame, centred or towards one edge.
+
+The photograph is the scene and the card is what it says. The card's `label` describes the whole picture to assistive technology; the photograph is decoration unless `alt` says otherwise.
+
+## Use when
+
+- Product information shown over a photograph — a trade ticket, a balance, a market's status — where the photograph sets the scene and the card says what the product does
+- A hero or a feature section needs a picture of the product in use rather than a screenshot or a photograph alone
+
+## Do not use
+
+- The card stands on its own, with no photograph behind it → `IllustrationCard`
+- There is only a photograph → `AspectRatio`
+- A section's content. Like the card it holds, the scene is a picture of the product, and what a section says belongs in its own blocks
+- More than one card over one photograph. A second card is a second picture competing for the same eye; two scenes side by side say two things clearly
+- A photograph whose subject sits where the card goes. The card covers the middle of the frame, or one side of it with `placement`; choose or crop the photograph so the person or the object stays clear of it
+
+## Anatomy
+
+IllustrationScene renders 2 elements. A token binding names the part it applies to.
+
+- `root` — `<div>`, class `dds-illustrationscene`. The frame, and the shape: one of three proportions — the aspect tokens, the same three IllustrationCard takes — holding radius.surface like a Card and clipping the photograph to it. It places the card it holds over the photograph, at a share of its width that depends on the shape, so every scene across a site composes the same way.
+- `image` — `<img>`, class `dds-illustrationscene__image`. The photograph, filling the frame and cropped to it from the centre. Decoration unless `alt` says otherwise: the card's `label` already describes the whole picture, so most scenes leave the photograph out of the accessibility tree. While it loads, the frame shows color.bg.surface, so the card is never left floating on nothing.
+
+Apply these classes from the generated `illustrationSceneParts` constant rather than writing the strings by hand.
+
+## Composition
+
+- Can contain: `IllustrationCard`
+- Never contains: `IllustrationScene`, `Background` — in children or in any prop that takes a node
+- Holds at least 1 and at most 1
+
+## Props
+
+### ratio — `landscape` | `square` | `upright` (default `square`)
+
+- `landscape` — Four by three. A scene beside words in a wide section; the card takes a little under half the width
+- `square` — One by one, and the default — the shape most such scenes are drawn in. The card takes a little over half the width
+- `upright` — Three by four. A scene on a phone or in a narrow column; the card takes most of the width
+
+Use when: The scene's shape. One of three, the same three IllustrationCard takes, so scenes and cards across a site agree
+Never for: Fitting a particular photograph. The shape is a decision about the layout; the photograph is chosen or cropped for it
+
+### placement — `center` | `start` | `end` (default `center`)
+
+- `center` — The default: the card in the middle of the frame. For a photograph whose subject frames the middle — a person looking down at what the card shows
+- `start` — The card towards the start edge, for a photograph whose subject is at the end
+- `end` — The card towards the end edge, for a photograph whose subject is at the start
+
+Use when: Where the card sits over the photograph, so the subject of the photograph stays clear of it
+Never for: Anything but keeping the photograph's subject clear. The card's size is fixed by the shape; placement moves it and nothing else
+
+### src — `string` **Required.**
+
+Use when: Always. The photograph the scene is set in
+Never for: A data URI holding a photograph. A scene's photograph is the heaviest thing on its page and belongs in a file the browser can cache
+
+### alt — `string` (default ``)
+
+Use when: Empty by default, because the card's `label` describes the whole picture and the photograph is decoration. Write one only where the photograph says something the label does not
+Never for: Repeating the card's label. A screen reader would hear the picture described twice
+
+Also accepts everything from `HTMLAttributes<HTMLDivElement>`.
+
+## Accessibility
+
+Guaranteed by the component. Write none of it by hand: the ids these attributes point at are generated per instance, so an attribute set from outside either says the same thing twice or points at nothing.
+
+- the picture is described once. The card's label names what the scene shows; the photograph is decoration with an empty alt unless it says something the label does not
+- nothing in the scene can be operated. The card it holds is inert, and the photograph is an image
+
+## Rules
+
+- **On a phone a section's actions stack and each fills the width, including when there is only one** — On a phone a page's actions stack, and each one fills the width. Not most of it, and not the width its label happens to need — the whole column.
+
+Two side by side is what this replaces. On the narrowest screen each gets half a column minus the gap, which is rarely enough for a real label: the words wrap inside the pills, the two buttons come out different heights, and the pair reads as a broken row rather than as a choice. Stacked, each has the whole width and neither has to shorten its words to fit.
+
+A single action fills too, and that is the part worth saying, because it is the one that looks unnecessary. A lone button has the room to sit at its natural width and still should not: a full-width control is the phone's convention for the thing the screen is asking you to do, and a pill hugging its label reads as one option among others that are not there. It also makes the target predictable — the whole width, wherever the thumb lands — which a centred pill does not.
+
+Filling is the row's job rather than the button's. A button has no width of its own and is not given one; the row it sits in becomes a column and stretches its children, so nothing about the control changes and the same button is full width here and its own size on a desktop.
+
+This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that decides whether a heading is centred. Those are different questions and they break at different widths: a heading stops being centred when the measure is the screen, while a button stops being full width much sooner than that — stretched across a tablet it is a long way from its own label, and a label centred in a metre of pill is harder to hit than one in a pill the size of the words.
+
+What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
+  Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
+  Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
+- **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
+
+color.bg.brand carries a second limit that is not about forgetting. Its ink measures 3.39:1, which clears the 3:1 a heading needs and misses the 4.5:1 running copy needs. A coral band may carry a headline and a call to action; a paragraph on one is text the reader has to work through at a ratio the waiver on that role does not cover — the waiver says so itself. A section with copy in it takes color.bg.brand-strong, which is near-black and carries white at full contrast.
+
+color.bg.strong is not a section ground. It is the inverted fill for an action that has to outrank what surrounds it, and the components that paint it — Button and ButtonIcon in their inverse form — already set both halves in one rule, which is the pattern a hand-painted section has to copy.
+  Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
+- **Every gap inside a section names the relationship it expresses, and the same relationship keeps its measure when it turns on its side** — A section's spacing is named by the relationship it expresses, not chosen by size. Every gap in a section has a role token, and reaching for a step off the generic scale because it happens to be the right number is how two sections written by two people stop lining up: the numbers agree today and drift the first time one of them is tuned.
+
+The heading group is three steps, not one gap. An eyebrow sits nearer its title than the title sits to its description, and the actions sit further from the description than either — space.heading.eyebrow-title, space.heading.title-description, space.heading.description-actions, in that order. A single `gap` on the group cannot say this; it sets all three the same and the block reads as evenly spaced lines rather than as a mark, a name and a paragraph. The eyebrow has to identify itself for this to work, because a group that opens with a title must not give its description the eyebrow's tighter step.
+
+The step between a title and its description follows the size of the title, which is why there are two of it. What a reader sees is not the gap but the gap plus the leading above it, and leading scales with the type: under a display title the leading is most of the space, under a card's title it is half as deep. One value for both makes a card look loose at the size that made a section look right. So space.heading.title-description is the display step and space.heading.title-description-compact is the step at a card's size, and the choice is made by how big the title is rather than by what kind of block it sits in.
+
+Every one of those steps is smaller than the gap below the group, and that ordering is what holds the group together as one thing. space.heading.content is the step between a heading group and the content it introduces, and it is the widest measure inside a section: the one gap the eye reads as a change of subject rather than as a continuation.
+
+That step is the same whether the content is under the heading or beside it. A split is the same relationship turned on its side — a heading group and the content it introduces — so the space between the two halves is space.heading.content, not a gutter. When the split collapses to one column on a phone the gap becomes vertical again, which is where it started, and nothing has to change for that to be right.
+
+space.grid.gutter is between two things of the same kind. Two cards in a row are the same kind; the two halves of a split are not, which is why the gutter is the wrong measure there even when the number would have looked acceptable. The gutter runs on both axes, so a grid reads as an even field rather than as rows with a seam down them.
+
+space.inset.card is the card's, not the page's. A row of cards padded differently is a row of different cards, and the fill is the only edge they have. A page composing a row does not get to choose it.
+
+Column count is not a breakpoint decision. A row holds as many columns as fit before a column would be narrower than size.grid.column-min, and drops one when they would not. Written as a fixed count that collapses at a breakpoint, a four-up row keeps four columns at every width above the phone and sets its copy two or three words to a line through the whole of the tablet range — and on a narrow desktop, which no breakpoint sits on at all. The threshold is a property of the row rather than of a card: a card fills whatever cell it is given.
+
+What this does not cover is the space above and below a section, which is space.section.default and space.section.compact, and the page's own side margin, which is space.inset.page. Those are the section's outside; everything here is its inside.
+  Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
+- **A section's title is centred over stacked content, starts beside content in columns, and starts on a phone** — Two arrangements, and the title's alignment is decided by which one it is introducing rather than chosen per section.
+
+Content stacked under the title — a row of cards, an accordion, a set of steps — takes a centred title. The heading group and the block below it share one axis, so a centred title is symmetric with the thing it names, and the eye drops from the middle of the words to the middle of the set. A title starting at the left over a centred or full-width block reads as belonging to the first column rather than to all of them.
+
+Content beside the title — a split, a picture in the other half, anything laid out in columns — takes a title that starts where its content starts. The two share a left edge, and that edge is what says they are one thing read across rather than two stacked. Centring the title there breaks the only alignment the reader has to hold the halves together, and it drifts further from its content the wider the page gets.
+
+The heading group is what carries this, not the heading alone. An eyebrow, a title and a description are read as one block and align together; aligning the title without them leaves a centred heading over start-aligned copy, which reads as a mistake rather than as a choice.
+
+Centred means all of it, not just the words. A badge, a row of actions, a picture — these are flex children, and a flex child is placed by align-items rather than by text-align, so a block that only sets the text leaves everything that is not text at the start. A hero is the case that shows it: its title and copy centred while its badge and its buttons did not.
+
+A capped block centres itself as well as its words. A heading group takes size.heading-group.max, and a cap that is not centred leaves the measure at the start of the column with the words centred inside it — composed, and a long way left of the middle it appears to be in.
+
+Both arrangements go to the start on a phone. A centred block reverts below the breakpoint, and the reason is the measure: on a phone the measure is the screen, so a centred title wraps to three or four ragged lines and the eye loses the left edge it was tracking — the same symmetry that reads as composure on a desktop is what makes it hard to scan on a phone. Centring there has to be asked for twice, and a section title is not one of the things that asks: it is centred because there is room for it, and on a phone there is not. Going back to the start means all of it too, and a capped block is the one that hides a leftover: its words go to the start while its measure stays in the middle of the column, which reads as a title still centred over a badge and buttons that are not — the box in the middle and the line inside it at the edge.
+
+A hero is a section like any other: its badge, title, copy and actions are one stacked block, so it is centred on a desktop and starts on a phone with everything else.
+
+What this is not about is a page whose body is a form or a document. A title over a sign-up form or a guide is not introducing a set of content — it is the first line of the thing itself, and it keeps the alignment the body has, which for running text is the start. The distinction is whether the block below is content the title names or content the title is part of.
+  Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
+- **Anything a pointer has to hit is at least 24px in both directions** — A control sized by its contents is as big as its contents, and a glyph is chosen for how it reads rather than for how easily it is hit. An icon-only button with no padding is a 16px target — smaller than the pad of a finger, and smaller than the tremor of a hand using a mouse.
+
+WCAG 2.2 asks for 24 by 24 CSS pixels at AA. The exceptions are narrower than they look: inline targets inside a sentence are exempt, and so is a small target with 24px of clear space around it — but a clear button sits against the field it empties, and a field is itself a target, so the spacing exemption does not apply to the case that keeps arising.
+
+The target and the mark are separate decisions, and conflating them is what produces both faults. Growing the glyph to 24px makes it shout; leaving the button at 16px makes it hard to hit. So the glyph keeps the size that reads correctly beside its text, and the box around it declares a minimum of its own — which is what size.target.min is for.
+
+Declared rather than emergent. Padding plus contents does clear 24px in several components today, and it is the weaker statement: it is a size nobody wrote down, so it moves when the type scale or the glyph does, and nothing says it was meant to be a target at all.
+  Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
+- **A component is written along the reading axis, not along the page's left and right** — Every measure, inset and placement in this package names an axis rather than a side: inline-size and block-size, padding-inline and padding-block, inset-inline-start and inset-block-end, margin-inline: auto, text-align: start. Written that way a component follows whichever direction the page is read in, and a band whose claim ranges to the leading edge with its subject on the trailing one is the same composition in Arabic as in English, mirrored, with nothing restated. Written as left and right it is the same pixels in both, which is a layout nobody designed for the second language.
+
+The enum values follow the same rule and for the same reason. A prop that names where a picture sits takes start and end, never left and right — FeatureSplit, FeatureBullets and FeatureScroll all declare mediaPosition that way, and the flex directions they generate flip on their own because row already means the reading order. A value called left would have to be re-read as right by every author working in a mirrored page, which is a translation this system should be doing rather than asking for.
+
+The guidance a contract carries is part of the component, so it follows too. Describing a claim as ranging left is describing one of the two languages, and it was written that way here for a while: three of the opening bands said so in their own intent. A reader in a mirrored page meets that sentence and has to decide whether the component is wrong or the sentence is, and neither answer is one documentation should force.
+
+Two things genuinely have no logical form and are not covered by this. A CSS gradient takes a physical direction — there is no to inline-end — so a pattern that must mirror has to be stated twice under a direction query, and one that is periodic and centred, like PageHeader's rule grid, does not need to. A glyph that points the way onward is the other: an arrow is a picture of a direction, and mirroring it belongs to the icon set rather than to the component holding it.
+  Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
+
+## Anti-examples
+
+❌ IllustrationScene for: The card stands on its own, with no photograph behind it
+   A card standing on a band or beside words needs no scene; the card alone is the picture
+   → use `IllustrationCard` instead.
+
+❌ IllustrationScene for: There is only a photograph
+   Without a card over it, a photograph is an AspectRatio
+   → use `AspectRatio` instead.
+
+## Example
+
+```tsx
+import { IllustrationScene, IllustrationCard, Badge, Typography, Row, StatusDot } from '@deriv-com/dds-marketing'
+
+<IllustrationScene ratio="square" src="/sample-card-image.svg">
+  <IllustrationCard ratio="square" label="Synthetic indices: Volatility 75 Index at 1,204.55, open now">
+    <Badge label="Synthetic indices" variant="neutral" />
+    <Typography variant="h5">Volatility 75 Index</Typography>
+    <Typography variant="figure">1,204.55</Typography>
+    <Row gap="xs" align="center">
+      <StatusDot variant="success" label="Open" />
+      <Typography variant="body-sm">Open now</Typography>
+    </Row>
+  </IllustrationCard>
+</IllustrationScene>
+```
+
+## In use
+
+Most rows below hold the same set, written once here:
+
+```tsx
+import { Badge, IllustrationCard, Row, StatusDot, Typography } from '@deriv-com/dds-marketing'
+
+const illustrationcards = (
+  <>
+    <IllustrationCard ratio="square" label="Synthetic indices: Volatility 75 Index at 1,204.55, open now">
+  <Badge label="Synthetic indices" variant="neutral" />
+  <Typography variant="h5">Volatility 75 Index</Typography>
+  <Typography variant="figure">1,204.55</Typography>
+  <Row gap="xs" align="center">
+    <StatusDot variant="success" label="Open" />
+    <Typography variant="body-sm">Open now</Typography>
+  </Row>
+</IllustrationCard>
+  </>
+)
+```
+
+### Its three shapes
+
+The same three shapes as the card, and the card's share of the frame fixed for each, so every scene across a site is composed the same way.
+
+```tsx
+import { IllustrationScene } from '@deriv-com/dds-marketing'
+
+// landscape — 4:3
+<IllustrationScene ratio="landscape" src="/sample-card-image.svg">{illustrationcards}</IllustrationScene>
+
+// square — 1:1, the default
+<IllustrationScene ratio="square" src="/sample-card-image.svg">{illustrationcards}</IllustrationScene>
+
+// upright — 3:4
+<IllustrationScene ratio="upright" src="/sample-card-image.svg">{illustrationcards}</IllustrationScene>
+```
+
+### Where the card sits
+
+Centred, or towards one edge, so the photograph's subject stays clear of the card.
+
+```tsx
+import { IllustrationScene } from '@deriv-com/dds-marketing'
+
+// center — the default
+<IllustrationScene ratio="square" src="/sample-card-image.svg">{illustrationcards}</IllustrationScene>
+
+// start
+<IllustrationScene ratio="square" src="/sample-card-image.svg" placement="start">{illustrationcards}</IllustrationScene>
+
+// end
+<IllustrationScene ratio="square" src="/sample-card-image.svg" placement="end">{illustrationcards}</IllustrationScene>
+```

package/.llm/components/landinghero.md

@@ -100,6 +100,13 @@ Never for: The background. A photograph filling the band is `backgroundImage`; t
 Use when: A photograph filling the whole band. It is shown as it is — nothing is painted over it, so choose one already dark enough that the title reads on it
 Never for: A flat colour, or a bright photograph. The band already paints its ground, and nothing here darkens an image on the page's behalf — a pale one leaves the claim unreadable
 
+### background — `halftone`
+
+- `halftone` — A halftone drawn behind the band's content: coral dots blending to white at the glow's heart, on the band's own dark ground, following the pointer over the band. Drawn by Background, placed as a layer under the content, so the band's own layout is untouched.
+
+Use when: The band is the page's one standout moment and wants more than a flat fill. Leave it out and the band is its flat ground, as it always was
+Never for: More than one band on a page. The pattern is what makes a band the one a reader remembers, and two of them make neither
+
 ## Accessibility
 
 Guaranteed by the component. Write none of it by hand: the ids these attributes point at are generated per instance, so an attribute set from outside either says the same thing twice or points at nothing.
@@ -124,7 +131,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 
@@ -198,6 +205,9 @@ Two things genuinely have no logical form and are not covered by this. A CSS gra
 ❌ LandingHero for: The band closes the page rather than opening it
    → use `Footer` instead.
 
+❌ background=halftone + backgroundImage is set
+   Two grounds on one band: the photograph would paint over the pattern, or the pattern over the photograph. A hero is a picture or a pattern, never both
+
 ## Example
 
 ```tsx
@@ -252,3 +262,17 @@ import { LandingHero } from '@deriv-com/dds-marketing'
 // h2 — the page already carries its h1 elsewhere
 <LandingHero headingLevel="h2" title="Trade the markets you know" description="Open a free demo account with virtual funds and practise on real market prices." />
 ```
+
+### A halftone ground
+
+The band's dark ground with a halftone glowing behind the words and following the pointer, drawn by Background under the band's own content.
+
+```tsx
+import { Button, LandingHero } from '@deriv-com/dds-marketing'
+
+// halftone — move the pointer over it
+<LandingHero eyebrow="Trading for" title="Anyone, anywhere, anytime" description="Widest range of products, markets and platforms, with 24/7 customer support." actions={<Button variant="primary">Open account</Button>} background="halftone" />
+
+// without — the flat ground
+<LandingHero eyebrow="Trading for" title="Anyone, anywhere, anytime" description="Widest range of products, markets and platforms, with 24/7 customer support." actions={<Button variant="primary">Open account</Button>} />
+```

package/.llm/components/link.md

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Link renders 3 elements. A token binding names the part it applies to.
   
   A box of the tab's own rather than the glyph itself, because Icon clones onto the SVG and this part is the place in the line. Drawn at `icon.size.xs` — sixteen, a step below what a control takes, because this sits beside words rather than inside a target and twenty next to a sixteen-pixel label outweighs the words it is there to qualify. The part carries the gap and nothing else: the colour comes from the link, which is what `fill="currentColor"` on the glyph is for.
   
-  Solid, like the arrow after the words. Both marks on a link take the same weight, and what earns it is the size rather than emphasis — see the trailing slot, which carries the argument and the exception it makes to `icon-solid-marks-selection`. Rendered only when `iconLeading` is set.
+  Solid, like the arrow after the words. Both marks on a link take the same weight, and what earns it is the size rather than emphasis — see the trailing slot, which carries the argument. Rendered only when `iconLeading` is set.
 - `icon-trailing` — `<span>`, class `dds-link__icon-trailing`. The mark after the words, and the component decides all of it — whether there is one, which one it is, and when it shows.
   
   Three answers. An external link is always marked. A standalone or list link is marked unless it opts out, though a list one holds its mark at zero until the pointer arrives. An inline link is bare unless it asks.
@@ -62,9 +62,9 @@ Link renders 3 elements. A token binding names the part it applies to.
   
   The weight follows the words the mark sits beside, which is the only thing the variants disagree about here.
   
-  A standalone link sets its label at `font.label.md` — semibold — and against that the regular cut's strokes read as a smudge rather than a direction, so its arrow is solid, and so is its leading glyph. That is a deliberate exception to `icon-solid-marks-selection`: the rule reserves the weight for a selected item, this is not one, and what earns it is legibility at sixteen pixels beside a heavier neighbour. Named here so the exception is on the record rather than discovered.
+  A standalone link sets its label at `font.label.md` — semibold — and against that the regular cut's strokes read as a smudge rather than a direction, so its arrow is solid, and so is its leading glyph. That is no exception to `icon-weight-within-a-set`: the rule reserves the weight for the current one of a set, a link's arrow sits in no set, and what earns it is legibility at sixteen pixels beside a heavier neighbour. Named here so the reasoning is on the record rather than discovered.
   
-  An inline link has no label of its own — it takes the paragraph, which is body copy at the regular weight. A solid arrow there outweighs every word around it, so the exception does not reach it and the regular cut is what it draws. The mark matches its neighbours in both cases; only the neighbours differ.
+  An inline link has no label of its own — it takes the paragraph, which is body copy at the regular weight. A solid arrow there outweighs every word around it, so legibility does not ask for solid and the regular cut is what it draws. The mark matches its neighbours in both cases; only the neighbours differ.
   
   Drawn at `icon.size.xs` like the leading slot, so a link carrying both draws them alike. It is decorative and announced as nothing, which is why the accessibility requirement below asks an external link to say so in its words as well.
   
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/logocolumns.md

@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/logorows.md

@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/menuitem.md

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/navbar.md

@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/navbaritem.md

@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/navbarmenu.md

@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/navbarmenugroup.md

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/navbarpanel.md

@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/navbarswitcher.md

@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/navbarswitcheroption.md

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/option.md

@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/pageheader.md

@@ -78,6 +78,13 @@ Accepts: Button, Link
 Use when: The one or two things the page wants a reader to do. Composed by the page rather than described to this component, so a call to action is the same Button here as anywhere else on the site
 Never for: A row of destinations. Three or more controls under a title is a menu, and a reader who has to choose between five things chooses none
 
+### background — `halftone`
+
+- `halftone` — A halftone drawn behind the band's content: coral dots blending to white at the glow's heart, on the band's own dark ground, following the pointer over the band. Drawn by Background, placed as a layer under the content, so the band's own layout is untouched. It replaces the rule grid rather than joining it: two patterns on one band are texture fighting texture.
+
+Use when: The band is the page's one standout moment and wants more than a flat fill. Leave it out and the band is its flat ground, as it always was
+Never for: More than one band on a page. The pattern is what makes a band the one a reader remembers, and two of them make neither
+
 ## Accessibility
 
 Guaranteed by the component. Write none of it by hand: the ids these attributes point at are generated per instance, so an attribute set from outside either says the same thing twice or points at nothing.
@@ -101,7 +108,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 
@@ -229,3 +236,17 @@ import { PageHeader } from '@deriv-com/dds-marketing'
 // h2 — the page already carries its h1 elsewhere
 <PageHeader headingLevel="h2" title="Contact us" description="Got questions? Here's how to get answers." />
 ```
+
+### A halftone ground
+
+The band's dark ground with a halftone in place of the rule grid, glowing behind the title and following the pointer.
+
+```tsx
+import { PageHeader } from '@deriv-com/dds-marketing'
+
+// halftone — move the pointer over it
+<PageHeader title="Contact us" description="Got questions? Here's how to get answers." background="halftone" />
+
+// without — the flat ground
+<PageHeader title="Contact us" description="Got questions? Here's how to get answers." />
+```

package/.llm/components/pagination.md

@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/paginationdots.md

@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/producthero.md

@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/removablechip.md

@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/row.md

@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.
 

package/.llm/components/scroller.md

@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ This is the phone's breakpoint, size.breakpoint.md, and not the wider one that d
 
 What this is not about is every row of controls. A set of filter chips, a pagination strip, a toolbar, a link sitting after a sentence — none of these is the page asking for something, and stacking them to full width would turn a strip the eye skims into a list it has to read. The test is whether the row is the call to action the section was written for.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
-- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, Input and Switch simultaneously.
+- **Never nest one interactive element inside another** — Nested interactive elements produce ambiguous hit targets and an unreachable inner control for keyboard and screen-reader users. This is why the rule cannot live on any single component — it constrains Button, Link, CardButton and TextInput simultaneously.
   Guidance only — cannot be checked automatically.
 - **A section that paints a ground sets the ink to go with it** — A page sits on color.bg.page, and a section that separates itself from it takes one of three grounds. color.bg.subtle is the light one and needs nothing further — the page's own ink still reads on it. The other two are dark and do not: color.bg.brand-strong takes color.fg.on-brand-strong, and color.bg.brand takes color.fg.on-solid. Both are white, and both are written as the role rather than the white they resolve to. Set one of those backgrounds without its ink and the text inherits whatever the page was already using, which is near-black on a dark band — legible to nobody, and invisible to every check here, because each pair passes contrast on its own and nothing can tell whether a section used both.