@deftai/directive-content 0.86.0 → 0.88.0

package/glossary.md

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ These concepts originate from [GSD](https://github.com/gsd-build/get-shit-done)
 
 **Fractal summaries** — Hierarchical memory compression: task summaries compress into feature summaries, which compress into release summaries. Iron rule: never summarize summaries — regenerate each level from the level below + code state. See [context/fractal-summaries.md](./context/fractal-summaries.md).
 
-**Specification vbrief** — The source-of-truth pattern for project intent. `./vbrief/specification.vbrief.json` is the canonical specification file; `SPECIFICATION.md` is a generated artifact rendered from it. The spec vbrief is created via interview (`templates/make-spec.md`), reviewed by the user, approved (`status: approved`), then rendered. Never edit the `.md` directly — edit the source vbrief. See [vbrief/vbrief.md](./vbrief/vbrief.md).
+**Specification xbrief** — The source-of-truth pattern for project intent. `./xbrief/specification.xbrief.json` is the canonical specification file; `SPECIFICATION.md` is a generated artifact rendered from it. Never edit the `.md` directly — edit the source xbrief. See [vbrief/vbrief.md](./vbrief/vbrief.md) (schema reference; public name is xBRIEF).
 
 **Stub detection** — Scanning completed code for incomplete implementations: `TODO`/`FIXME` markers, `return null`/`return {}`/`pass` placeholders, functions under ~8 lines returning hardcoded values. See [verification/verification.md](./verification/verification.md).
 
@@ -48,98 +48,96 @@ These concepts originate from [GSD](https://github.com/gsd-build/get-shit-done)
 
 **Zero discovery calls** — The principle that agents should never spend tokens figuring out where they are, what exists, or what was decided. All of that should be pre-assembled in context before the task starts. See [resilience/context-pruning.md](./resilience/context-pruning.md).
 
-**Brownfield mapping** — Structured reconnaissance of an existing codebase before modifying it. Produces four artifacts: STACK (languages, frameworks, infrastructure), ARCHITECTURE (layers, entry points, data flow), CONVENTIONS (naming, patterns, file layout), and CONCERNS (tech debt, fragile areas, missing tests). See [strategies/map.md](./strategies/map.md). Invoked via `/deft:run:map`.
+**Brownfield mapping** — Structured reconnaissance of an existing codebase before modifying it. Produces four artifacts: STACK, ARCHITECTURE, CONVENTIONS, and CONCERNS. See [strategies/map.md](./strategies/map.md). Invoked via `/deft:run:map`.
 
 **Integration checking** — Cross-feature wiring verification that every export has a matching import, every API endpoint has a consumer, auth gates protect all required routes, and at least one E2E flow traces through the full stack. See [verification/integration.md](./verification/integration.md).
 
-**Plan checking** — Pre-execution verification of a plan across four dimensions: (1) coverage — every acceptance criterion maps to at least one task, (2) completeness — every task has a verify command, (3) wiring — cross-feature dependencies declared in boundary maps, (4) scope — task count within sanity thresholds (2–3 ideal, 5+ requires split). See [verification/plan-checking.md](./verification/plan-checking.md).
+**Plan checking** — Pre-execution verification of a plan across four dimensions: coverage, completeness, wiring, scope. See [verification/plan-checking.md](./verification/plan-checking.md).
 
-**Scope sanity** — A threshold-based guard against over-scoped plans that degrade context window quality. 1–3 tasks per plan is ideal; 4 is a warning; 5+ is a blocker requiring plan split. Part of plan checking dimension 4. See [verification/plan-checking.md](./verification/plan-checking.md).
+**Scope sanity** — Threshold guard against over-scoped plans (1–3 tasks ideal; 5+ requires split). Part of plan checking. See [verification/plan-checking.md](./verification/plan-checking.md).
 
-**Spec delta** — A scoped document capturing how a change modifies existing requirements. Shows new requirements and was/now diffs for modified ones. Linked to the baseline spec via vBRIEF `references` with `type: "x-vbrief/plan"`. Lives in `history/changes/<name>/specs/`. See [context/spec-deltas.md](./context/spec-deltas.md). Invoked as part of `/deft:change`.
+**Spec delta** — Scoped document capturing how a change modifies existing requirements. Linked via xBRIEF `references`. Lives in `history/changes/<name>/specs/`. See [context/spec-deltas.md](./context/spec-deltas.md).
 
-**Verify command** — A concrete, runnable command specified per task that confirms the task's work is correct (e.g., `pytest tests/test_auth.py`, `curl localhost:8080/health`). Required by plan checking dimension 2 (completeness). Tasks without a verify command fail the plan check.
+**Verify command** — A concrete, runnable command per task that confirms the work is correct. Required by plan checking dimension 2.
 
 ---
 
 ## Framework Design Terms
 
-Terms describing how directive itself is structured and governed.
-
 **Bounded context** (framework sense) — A file or directory in directive that owns a specific rule domain. Other files reference it; they do not restate its rules. Prevents rule drift through duplication. Examples: `coding/hygiene.md` owns hygiene rules; `coding/testing.md` owns universal testing standards.
 
 **Rule ownership** — The principle that each concept in directive has exactly one owning file. When multiple files need to reference the concept, they link to the owner rather than duplicating the rule.
 
 **Ubiquitous language** — The shared, precisely defined vocabulary used consistently across all directive files and by all agents. This glossary is the source of truth. Synonyms and informal restatements of defined terms are not permitted.
 
+**Coding host** (host) · **skill pack** · **practice layer** · **orchestrator** — Buyer/evaluator category map. Canonical aid: [docs/CATEGORY.md](../docs/CATEGORY.md) (#2905).
+
 ---
 
 ## Hygiene Terms
 
-Terms used in [coding/hygiene.md](./coding/hygiene.md).
-
-**Hygiene** — The ongoing practice of keeping a codebase clean beyond what individual changes introduce: removing dead code, eliminating circular dependencies, surfacing hidden errors, and removing legacy/deprecated code paths. Distinct from per-change quality gates, which only govern new code.
+**Hygiene** — Keeping a codebase clean beyond what individual changes introduce: dead code, circular deps, hidden errors, legacy paths. See [coding/hygiene.md](./coding/hygiene.md).
 
-**Dead code** — Code that is defined but never executed: unused functions, unreachable branches, stale feature flags, and commented-out blocks. Distinct from deprecated code, which may still execute on a legacy path.
+**Dead code** — Code defined but never executed.
 
-**Error hiding** — Any pattern that prevents an error from being observed by the caller or operator: empty catch blocks, silent fallbacks, returning neutral/zero values to mask failures, or log-and-continue without surfacing the error upstream.
+**Error hiding** — Patterns that prevent errors from being observed by the caller or operator.
 
-**Legacy code** — A code path, implementation, or feature flag that has been superseded but not removed. Identified by markers such as `LEGACY`, `COMPAT`, `OLD_`, `TODO: remove`, or the presence of two parallel implementations without a migration path.
+**Legacy code** — Superseded path not yet removed.
 
-**Circular dependency** — An import cycle where module A depends on module B which depends (directly or transitively) on module A. Indicates architectural coupling that prevents modular testing and signals a layering violation.
+**Circular dependency** — Import cycle A→B→A (directly or transitively).
 
 ---
 
 ## GSD → Deft Term Mapping
 
-For readers familiar with [GSD](https://github.com/gsd-build/get-shit-done):
-
 | GSD Term | Deft Term | Notes |
 |----------|-----------|-------|
 | Milestone | **Release** | Shippable version |
 | Slice | **Feature** | Vertical capability with demo sentence |
 | Task | **Task** | Same — add "fits in one context window" |
-| Must-haves | **Acceptance criteria** | With subcategories: truths, artifacts, key links |
-| Continue file | **Continue checkpoint** | `./vbrief/continue.vbrief.json` (singular) |
-| Discuss phase | **Interview** (extended) | Adds decision locking + Feynman technique |
-| Boundary map | **Contract** (at planning level) | Extension of Contract-First |
+| Must-haves | **Acceptance criteria** | truths, artifacts, key links |
+| Continue file | **Continue checkpoint** | `./xbrief/continue.xbrief.json` |
+| Discuss phase | **Interview** (extended) | decision locking + Feynman |
+| Boundary map | **Contract** (planning) | Extension of Contract-First |
 | Wave execution | **Parallel group** | Speckit `[P]`/`[S]` markers |
 | Research phase | **Research** | Already in speckit |
 
 ---
 
-## vBRIEF Lifecycle Terms (v0.20+)
+## xBRIEF Lifecycle Terms
+
+Canonical vocabulary for the xBRIEF lifecycle. **xBRIEF** / `xbrief/` is the sole public current name (#2907). **vBRIEF** is legacy — see [UPGRADING.md — xBRIEF rename](./UPGRADING.md#xbrief-rename-2034--2110--2907).
 
-Canonical vocabulary for the vBRIEF lifecycle. (Merged from the former top-level `glossary.md` during the #1875 content/ move; deduplicated to a single canonical glossary.)
+- **Scope xBRIEF** -- A durable unit-of-work record, one per feature / bug / initiative, stored as `YYYY-MM-DD-slug.xbrief.json` inside a [lifecycle folder](#xbrief-lifecycle-terms). Primary work artifact (schema detail: [vbrief/vbrief.md](./vbrief/vbrief.md)).
 
-- **Scope vBRIEF** -- A durable unit-of-work record, one per feature / bug / initiative, stored as `YYYY-MM-DD-slug.vbrief.json` inside a [lifecycle folder](#terms). Scope vBRIEFs are the primary work artifact in v0.20 (see [vbrief/vbrief.md -- Scope vBRIEFs and Lifecycle Folders](./vbrief/vbrief.md#scope-vbriefs-and-lifecycle-folders)).
+- **Lifecycle folder** -- One of five subdirectories under `xbrief/`: `proposed/`, `pending/`, `active/`, `completed/`, `cancelled/`. Folder location reflects (but does not define) `plan.status`. See [vbrief/vbrief.md](./vbrief/vbrief.md).
 
-- **Lifecycle folder** -- One of the five subdirectories under `vbrief/`: `proposed/`, `pending/`, `active/`, `completed/`, `cancelled/`. Folder location reflects (but does not define) `plan.status`; see [vbrief/vbrief.md -- Directory Structure](./vbrief/vbrief.md#directory-structure) and [Status-Driven Moves](./vbrief/vbrief.md#status-driven-moves).
+- **Plan-level narrative** -- A key under `plan.narratives` in an xBRIEF (e.g. `Description`, `Acceptance`, `Traces`). Plain strings only. See [vbrief/vbrief.md](./vbrief/vbrief.md).
 
-- **Plan-level narrative** -- A key under `plan.narratives` in a vBRIEF file, describing the scope/plan as a whole (e.g. `Description`, `Acceptance`, `Traces`). Plan-level narratives describe the *what and why*; see [vbrief/vbrief.md -- Narratives](./vbrief/vbrief.md#narratives).
+- **Item-level narrative** -- A narrative string under `plan.items[].narrative` for one PlanItem. Plain strings only. See [vbrief/vbrief.md](./vbrief/vbrief.md).
 
-- **Item-level narrative** -- A narrative string under `plan.items[].narrative` describing a single `PlanItem` (a task / subtask within a scope). Both plan-level and item-level narratives MUST be plain strings -- never objects (see [vbrief/vbrief.md -- Narratives](./vbrief/vbrief.md#narratives)).
+- **Filename stem** -- The portion of an xBRIEF filename before `.xbrief.json`. Scope stems: `YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>`; speckit Phase 4: `YYYY-MM-DD-ip<NNN>-<slug>`. See [vbrief/vbrief.md](./vbrief/vbrief.md).
 
-- **Filename stem** -- The portion of a vBRIEF filename before `.vbrief.json`. For scope vBRIEFs the stem follows `YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>`; for speckit Phase 4 emissions the stem is `YYYY-MM-DD-ip<NNN>-<slug>` with `NNN` zero-padded to 3 digits (see [vbrief/vbrief.md -- Filename Convention](./vbrief/vbrief.md#filename-convention)).
+- **Cross-scope dependency** -- Dependency between two scope xBRIEFs at `plan.metadata.dependencies` (array of dependency IDs). See [vbrief/vbrief.md](./vbrief/vbrief.md).
 
-- **Cross-scope dependency** -- A dependency between two scope vBRIEFs (rather than between items inside a single scope). Cross-scope dependencies live at `plan.metadata.dependencies` as an array of dependency IDs -- plan-level by design (see [vbrief/vbrief.md -- Plan-level metadata](./vbrief/vbrief.md#plan-level-metadata)).
+- **Exit Commands** -- The seven deterministic `task scope:*` commands that transition a scope xBRIEF between lifecycle folders: `scope:promote`, `scope:activate`, `scope:complete`, `scope:cancel`, `scope:restore`, `scope:block`, `scope:unblock` (see [tasks/scope.yml](../tasks/scope.yml)).
 
-- **Exit Commands** -- The seven deterministic `task scope:*` commands that transition a scope vBRIEF between lifecycle folders: `scope:promote`, `scope:activate`, `scope:complete`, `scope:cancel`, `scope:restore`, `scope:block`, `scope:unblock` (see [tasks/scope.yml](../tasks/scope.yml)). Agents MUST use these instead of moving files by hand.
+- **Origin provenance** -- A `references` entry linking a scope xBRIEF to its origin issue / ticket / user-request. Required for ingestion dedup. See [vbrief/vbrief.md](./vbrief/vbrief.md).
 
-- **Origin provenance** -- A `references` entry on a scope vBRIEF linking back to the issue / ticket / user-request that spawned it (`type: github-issue`, `jira-ticket`, or `user-request`). Required for ingestion dedup; see [vbrief/vbrief.md -- Origin Provenance](./vbrief/vbrief.md#origin-provenance).
+- **Canonical narrative key** -- Reserved plan-level keys (`Description`, `Acceptance`, `Traces`) that tooling reads by name. See [vbrief/vbrief.md](./vbrief/vbrief.md).
 
-- **Canonical narrative key** -- One of the small set of reserved plan-level narrative keys (`Description`, `Acceptance`, `Traces`) that tooling (`task roadmap:render`, swarm allocator) reads by name. See [vbrief/vbrief.md -- Scope vBRIEF narrative keys](./vbrief/vbrief.md#scope-vbrief-narrative-keys).
+- **Preparatory strategy** -- A [strategies/](./strategies/) workflow that gathers context without producing a spec directly (e.g. `research.md`, `discuss.md`, `map.md`).
 
-- **Preparatory strategy** -- A [strategies/](./strategies/) workflow that gathers context without producing a spec directly (e.g. `research.md`, `discuss.md`, `map.md`, `bdd.md`). Preparatory strategies chain into a [spec-generating strategy](#terms).
+- **Spec-generating strategy** -- A [strategies/](./strategies/) workflow that emits `xbrief/specification.xbrief.json` (and optionally scope xBRIEFs) as authoritative output.
 
-- **Spec-generating strategy** -- A [strategies/](./strategies/) workflow that emits `vbrief/specification.vbrief.json` (and optionally scope vBRIEFs) as its authoritative output (e.g. `interview.md`, `speckit.md`, `enterprise.md`, `rapid.md`, `yolo.md`).
+- **Rendered export** -- A human-readable `.md` file (`SPECIFICATION.md`, `PRD.md`, `ROADMAP.md`) generated by `task *:render` from the underlying `.xbrief.json`. Read-only views; edit the source, not the export. See [UPGRADING.md](./UPGRADING.md).
 
-- **Rendered export** -- A human-readable `.md` file (`SPECIFICATION.md`, `PRD.md`, `ROADMAP.md`) generated on demand by a `task *:render` command from the underlying `.vbrief.json` file. Rendered exports are read-only views; direct edits are overwritten on the next render (see [UPGRADING.md -- What to expect](./UPGRADING.md#what-to-expect)).
+- **Source of truth** -- The file tooling treats as authoritative. Current: `.xbrief.json` files under `xbrief/`; corresponding `.md` files are [rendered exports](#xbrief-lifecycle-terms).
 
-- **Source of truth** -- The file that tooling treats as authoritative for a given piece of information. In v0.20 the `.vbrief.json` files are the source of truth; the corresponding `.md` files are [rendered exports](#terms). Editing a rendered export does not change the source of truth -- edit the `.vbrief.json` instead.
+- **Deterministic mode** -- Interaction shape for structured questions. Every deterministic-mode prompt MUST include `Discuss` and `Back` as the final two options (#767). Canonical rule: [`contracts/deterministic-questions.md`](./contracts/deterministic-questions.md).
 
-- **Deterministic mode** -- The interaction shape used by every Deft skill that asks the user structured questions (via `ask_user_question` single-select / multi-select) or numbered-menu prompts in skill prose. Every deterministic-mode prompt MUST include `Discuss` and `Back` as the final two numbered options (#767). The canonical rule and verbatim Discuss-pause semantic live at [`contracts/deterministic-questions.md`](./contracts/deterministic-questions.md); skill prose `!` cross-references that contract instead of duplicating the rule body.
+- **Branch-protection policy** -- Controls direct commits to master/main. Typed flag `plan.policy.allowDirectCommitsToMaster` on `xbrief/PROJECT-DEFINITION.xbrief.json` (#746); default `false`. Surfaces: skill guards, `task verify:branch` + hooks (#747), CI `branch-gate`. Reconfigure via `task policy:*`. Emergency: `DEFT_ALLOW_DEFAULT_BRANCH_COMMIT=1`.
 
-- **Branch-protection policy** -- The Deft policy surface that controls whether direct commits to the default branch (master/main) are allowed. The typed flag is `plan.policy.allowDirectCommitsToMaster` on `vbrief/PROJECT-DEFINITION.vbrief.json` (#746); default `false` (enforce feature branches). Three enforcement surfaces back the policy: skill-level guards at the entry of `deft-directive-{swarm,review-cycle,pre-pr,release}` (#746 part C), the detection-bound `scripts/preflight_branch.py` reachable via `task verify:branch` and the `.githooks/pre-commit` + `.githooks/pre-push` hooks (#747), and the CI `branch-gate` workflow asserting `head_ref != base_ref` (#747 part E). Reconfigure via `task policy:show` / `task policy:enforce-branches` / `task policy:allow-direct-commits -- --confirm`. Emergency bypass: `DEFT_ALLOW_DEFAULT_BRANCH_COMMIT=1`.
+- **Policy audit log** -- Append-only ledger at `meta/policy-changes.log` for transitions of `allowDirectCommitsToMaster` (#746 / #747).
 
-- **Policy audit log** -- One-line append-only ledger at `meta/policy-changes.log` recording every transition of `plan.policy.allowDirectCommitsToMaster`. Written by `scripts/policy_set.py` whenever `task policy:enforce-branches` or `task policy:allow-direct-commits -- --confirm` is invoked, including the actor, previous value, and any operator-supplied `--note`. Surface introduced by #746 acceptance criterion G2.
+- **vBRIEF (legacy)** -- Historical name for xBRIEF / `xbrief/` work-state. On-disk `vbrief/`, `*.vbrief.json`, `x-vbrief/*` tokens, and `vbrief:*` task aliases remain read-accepted until `deft migrate:xbrief`. ⊗ Teach vBRIEF as the current product name. Authoritative map: [UPGRADING.md — xBRIEF rename](./UPGRADING.md#xbrief-rename-2034--2110--2907).

package/package.json

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 {
   "name": "@deftai/directive-content",
-  "version": "0.86.0",
+  "version": "0.88.0",
   "description": "Shippable Directive framework content in the consumer .deft/core/ layout (C1 flatten), plus the engine surfaces (.githooks/, Taskfile.yml, tasks/) the deposit wires. Python-free per #2022 Phase 3. Refs #11, #1669, #1967.",
+  "license": "MIT",
   "type": "module",
   "files": [
     "**/*",

package/packs/rules/rules-pack-0.1.json

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
       "domain": "coding",
       "text": "All *.md in `docs/` directory (except README.md, AGENTS.md, WARP.md)",
       "path": "coding/coding.md",
-      "body": "# Coding Guidelines\n\nSoftware development specific guidelines for AI agents.\n\nLegend (from RFC2119): !=MUST, ~=SHOULD, ≉=SHOULD NOT, ⊗=MUST NOT, ?=MAY.\n\n**⚠️ See also** (load only when needed):\n- [../main.md](../../main.md) - General AI behavior and agent persona\n- [PROJECT.md](../../PROJECT.md) - For project-specific overrides\n- [../tools/telemetry.md](../tools/telemetry.md) - When implementing logging/tracing/metrics\n\n## Code Organization\n\n**Documentation:**\n- ! All *.md in `docs/` directory (except README.md, AGENTS.md, WARP.md)\n- ! Prior tasks/plans in `history/`\n\n**Filenames:**\n- ~ Use hyphens not underscores (unless language idiom)\n\n**Secrets:**\n- ! ALL secrets in `secrets/` dir as .env files\n- ⊗ Secrets in code\n\n## Code Search\n\n- ! use `rg`, or `ast-grep` (when available) instead of grep\n- ! Use Warp's built-in grep (which is rg) when running on warp\n- ~ Install if missing\n- ? Fall back to `grep` command only if tools cannot be installed\n\n## Version Control\n\nSee [../scm/git.md](../scm/git.md) for:\n- Commit conventions (Conventional Commits)\n- Safety rules (no force-push without permission)\n- Branch workflows\n\n## Code Design\n\n**Modularity:**\n- ! One responsibility per file/module\n- ~ Files <300 lines ideal; <500 lines recommended; <1000 lines a review trigger — split when exceeded unless genuinely single-responsibility (size is a smell, not a hard cap; #1488)\n- ! Explicit scope in task descriptions\n- ~ DRY: extract shared abstractions when logic is duplicated across 2+ call sites\n- ⊗ Copy-paste logic with minor variations — parameterise instead\n\n**Dependency Direction:**\n- ⊗ Circular imports between modules/packages\n- ~ Layered architecture: high-level modules depend on low-level ones, never the reverse\n- ! Use dependency inversion (interfaces/protocols) to break coupling across layers\n- See [hygiene.md](hygiene.md) for detection tools (madge, pydeps, Go compiler)\n\n**Contract-First:**\n- ! Define interfaces/types/protocols before implementation\n- ! Changes to public interfaces require explicit versioning or deprecation path\n- ! Document all public API contracts clearly\n\n**Immutability:**\n- ~ Prefer immutable data + pure functions\n- ~ When mutation needed, use narrow owned scopes (context managers, RAII)\n- ⊗ Global or singleton mutable state (almost always)\n\n**Error Handling:**\n- ~ Prefer Result/Option types or explicit exceptions over None/null/undefined\n- ! Document possible exceptions/error codes for all public functions\n- ! Validate all inputs at API boundaries\n- ⊗ Trust caller without validation\n- ⊗ Empty catch/except/recover blocks that swallow errors silently\n- ⊗ Returning neutral/zero values (None, {}, [], 0, false, \"\") to mask errors — propagate explicitly\n- ⊗ Log-and-continue: catching an error and proceeding as if it didn't happen, unless provably non-fatal and documented\n- See [hygiene.md](hygiene.md) for full error-hiding anti-pattern catalogue\n\n**Readability:**\n- ! Follow language idioms strictly\n- ! Meaningful names over short names\n- ! Comments explain **why**, code shows **what**\n- ⊗ Clever code over clear code\n\n## Quality Standards\n\n**General:**\n- ! Run all relevant checks (lint, fmt, quality, build, test) before submitting changes\n- ⊗ Claim checks passed without running them\n- ! If checks cannot run, explicitly state why and what would have been executed\n- ~ Prioritize code quality and readability over backwards compatibility\n\n**Testing:**\n- ! Implementation is INCOMPLETE until tests written AND `task test:coverage` passes\n- See [../coding/testing.md](../coding/testing.md) for universal requirements\n\n**Security:**\n- ! Apply baseline security standards to every project from day one\n- See [../coding/security.md](../coding/security.md) for input validation, authn/authz, secrets, dependency, TOCTOU / mutable-external-resource rules (#1938), and agent-specific threats (#661)\n\n**Codebase Hygiene:**\n- See [hygiene.md](hygiene.md) for: dead code removal, circular dependency detection, error hiding patterns, legacy/deprecated code cleanup\n\n**Telemetry:**\n- See [../tools/telemetry.md](../tools/telemetry.md) for recommendations\n- ~ Structured logging for production\n- ~ Error tracking (Sentry.io or equivalent)\n- ? Distributed tracing for complex systems\n\n## Fail Loud: Completion Claims Require Outcome Verification (#1006)\n\nThe failure mode is the agent stating completion at the level of **intent** (\"I ran the migration\", \"the tests pass\", \"the feature works\") rather than at the level of **outcome verification** (\"all 167 records migrated, 0 skipped\", \"42 tests collected, 42 passed, 0 skipped, 0 xfailed\", \"the edge case asked about was reproduced and now returns the expected value\"). Outcome-blind completion claims hide silent skips, swallowed exceptions, suppressed errors, and unverified edge cases behind successful-sounding language. The example from the source: a database migration that completed \"successfully\" had silently skipped 14% of records on a constraint violation; the skip was logged but not surfaced; the bad reports were discovered 11 days later.\n\nThis rule is the OPERATIONAL complement to the EPISTEMIC honesty rules elsewhere in the framework (`main.md` morals section: don't present speculation as fact; label unverified claims). Morals.md says \"don't lie\". Fail-loud says \"count the records, check the logs, run the edge case, **then** claim completion.\" It is also the output-side complement to goal-gate-determinism (the gate specifies what evidence is required) and machine-verifiable-spec (verification commands prevent silent skips) -- without fail-loud, an agent can satisfy the letter of a gate (\"tests pass\") while hiding the gap (\"some tests were skipped\").\n\n- ! Before claiming a batch operation succeeded, MUST verify the record count and surface it in the claim (\"migrated 167/167 records, 0 skipped, 0 errored\" -- not \"migration completed\")\n- ! Before claiming \"tests pass\", MUST report the count of collected / passed / skipped / xfailed / errored tests (\"42 collected, 42 passed, 0 skipped\" -- not \"tests pass\"). A skipped or xfailed test is NOT a passing test for the purpose of this claim\n- ! Before claiming \"the feature works\", MUST report the specific edge case that was verified (if the user asked about a specific edge case, that edge case MUST be in the verification report; \"the happy path works\" is not equivalent to \"the feature works\")\n- ! Before claiming a migration / data transform / batch job completed, MUST check the error log AND the skip log AND the constraint-violation surface; surface the counts even when zero (\"0 skipped, 0 errored\" is the load-bearing claim, not silence)\n- ! When uncertainty exists about whether something worked, MUST surface the uncertainty explicitly (\"the migration completed and reported success but I have not verified the per-record count -- recommend running `<verification-command>` before declaring done\")\n- ⊗ MUST NOT claim \"tests pass\" when any test was skipped, xfailed, or run with errors suppressed -- report the full counts instead\n- ⊗ MUST NOT claim \"migration completed\" / \"batch succeeded\" / \"job finished\" without checking and reporting the per-record outcome counts\n- ⊗ MUST NOT claim \"feature works\" when only the happy path was verified -- name the edge case that was tested, or surface that it wasn't\n- ⊗ MUST NOT use successful-sounding completion phrasing to paper over uncertainty -- default to surfacing uncertainty, not hiding it\n- ⊗ MUST NOT suppress error output (`2>$null`, `2>/dev/null`, `try/except: pass` around the verification command) and then claim completion based on the resulting silence\n\nThe rule applies to agent completion claims during task execution. It applies equally to claims to the user, claims in commit messages, claims in PR bodies, claims in CHANGELOG entries, and claims in status messages to a parent agent. A short, honest \"the migration completed; I did not verify the per-record count\" is strictly preferred over a confident \"migration completed successfully\" that hides the gap.\n\n**Cross-references:** `## Quality Standards` above (`⊗ Claim checks passed without running them` -- the sibling rule that this expands from process to outcome); `hygiene.md` `## Error Handling: No Hiding` (the same hiding pattern at the code-write level, not the claim level); `skills/deft-directive-pre-pr/SKILL.md` (pre-PR verification claims); `skills/deft-directive-build/SKILL.md` Step 4 Quality Gates (task-completion claims); `skills/deft-directive-review-cycle/SKILL.md` (the review-cycle skill explicitly checks for hidden incompleteness in fix-batch completion claims).\n\n## Calling LLM APIs (#481)\n\nWhen the project calls LLM APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, local models, etc.) or builds agentic functionality, the architectural standards in `patterns/llm-app.md` apply alongside the coding rules above. In the directive maintainer repo this section is **guidance for consumer projects** — provider names are illustrative labels under the framework instruction hierarchy, not runtime SDK surfaces (#2414; see `meta/security.md` `## Informational AppSec findings`). The short form:\n\n- ! User input is NEVER placed in the system prompt; the system prompt is the trust boundary\n- ! External content is ALWAYS wrapped in explicit delimiters (`<user_input>`, `<document>`, `<tool_result>`) and surfaces its trust tier\n- ! Tool call arguments are validated against a schema BEFORE execution (the LLM is a confused deputy)\n- ! LLM outputs are validated against expected schemas before being acted upon (no eval-of-output, no shell-of-output, no SQL-of-output)\n- ⊗ MUST NOT write LLM outputs back into the retrieval corpus in the same session without validation (RAG poisoning vector)\n\nSee [../patterns/llm-app.md](../patterns/llm-app.md) for the full standards: prompt construction, trust tiers, tool/function-call validation, RAG hygiene, output handling, multi-agent orchestration, and LLM-specific observability. See [../tools/telemetry.md](../tools/telemetry.md) `## LLM-specific observability (#481)` for the matching observability surface.\n\n## Debugging and Root-Cause Investigation (#1621)\n\nWhen a bug, failure, or unexpected behaviour needs diagnosis, the root-cause standards in `debugging.md` apply. The short form:\n\n- ! No fixes without root-cause investigation first (the Iron Law)\n- ! Reproduce the failure consistently before proposing a fix — a non-reproducible bug is not yet understood\n- ! Every factual claim cites evidence; an uncited claim is a `[HYPOTHESIS]`, not a finding (evidence before narrative)\n- ! Runtime/config values are proven from the runtime, never inferred from source code (config is not code)\n- ⊗ MUST NOT present a duration or an exit status (\"slow because phase X took N minutes\", \"failed because it timed out\") as a root cause — name a mechanism (no tautologies)\n- ! After 3 failed distinct fixes, STOP and escalate for architectural review (the 3-fix gate)\n\nSee [debugging.md](debugging.md) for the full four-phase process, evidence discipline, Fact vs Hypothesis labeling (#1580), the observability-gap loop, and the rationalization table. For a sustained multi-agent investigation posture, see the `deft-directive-debug` skill.\n\n## Build Automation\n\n**Taskfile:**\n- ! Use Task ([go-task](https://taskfile.dev)) for all repeatable operations\n- ! If `task` not found, attempt to install go-task\n- ! If installation fails, stop and ask user for help\n- See [../tools/taskfile.md](../tools/taskfile.md) for standards and common commands\n\n**Toolchain Validation:**\n- See [../coding/toolchain.md](../coding/toolchain.md) for rules on verifying required tools are installed before implementation begins\n\n**Build Output Validation:**\n- See [../coding/build-output.md](../coding/build-output.md) for rules on verifying `dist/` artifacts and non-compiled assets after custom build scripts run\n\n## Change Management\n\n**Impact Awareness:**\n- ! Before changing shared code, identify affected downstream modules/files\n- ~ Prefer additive changes (new functions, fields with defaults) over breaking renames\n- ! Make small, reversible changes\n- ! Explain impact and migration path for breaking changes\n\n**Production Safety:**\n- ! Assume production impact unless stated otherwise\n- ! Call out risk when touching: auth, billing, data, APIs, build systems\n- ⊗ Silent breaking behavior\n- ~ Test changes in staging/dev environment when possible\n\n## Language-Specific Guidelines\n\n**Languages:**\n- C++: [../languages/cpp.md](../languages/cpp.md)\n- Go: [../languages/go.md](../languages/go.md)\n- Office.js: [../languages/officejs.md](../languages/officejs.md)\n- Python: [../languages/python.md](../languages/python.md)\n- TypeScript: [../languages/typescript.md](../languages/typescript.md)\n- VBA: [../languages/vba.md](../languages/vba.md)\n\n**Interface Types:**\n- CLI: [../interfaces/cli.md](../interfaces/cli.md)\n- TUI: [../interfaces/tui.md](../interfaces/tui.md)\n- Web: [../interfaces/web.md](../interfaces/web.md)\n- REST API: [../interfaces/rest.md](../interfaces/rest.md)\n\n## Development Workflow\n\n**Localhost:**\n- No permission needed for curl localhost\n\n**Plans:**\n- ~ Create both:\n  1. Warp plan (using `create_plan` tool)\n  2. Archive copy in `history/plan-YYYY-MM-DD-description.md`\n\n## Project Context\n\n- ! Check [PROJECT.md](../../PROJECT.md) for project-specific overrides\n- ~ Inspect project config (package.json, pyproject.toml, etc.) for available scripts\n- ! Follow project-specific testing, coverage, and quality requirements\n\n## Anti-Patterns\n\n- ⊗ Secrets in code or version control\n- ⊗ Claiming checks passed without running them\n- ⊗ Single files mixing multiple responsibilities (large line count, e.g. >1000 lines, is a trigger to check cohesion — not a defect by itself; #1488)\n- ⊗ Skipping quality checks\n- ⊗ Breaking changes without explicit approval\n- ⊗ Using `grep` command when `rg` or Warp grep available\n- ⊗ Implementing code without tests\n- ⊗ Claiming \"done\" before running test:coverage\n- ⊗ Ignoring coverage drops\n- ⊗ Weak types (`any`, `interface{}`, untyped `object`) where concrete types are knowable\n- ⊗ Dead code: unused functions, unreachable branches, stale feature flags, commented-out blocks\n- ⊗ Error hiding: empty catch blocks, silent fallbacks, swallowed exceptions\n- ⊗ Circular imports between modules\n- ⊗ Duplicate logic across 2+ call sites without shared abstraction\n- ⊗ Outcome-blind completion claims: \"tests pass\" with skipped tests, \"migration completed\" without per-record counts, \"feature works\" without naming the verified edge case (#1006 -- see `## Fail Loud` above)\n- ⊗ Averaging contradicting codebase patterns: writing new code that satisfies both of two conflicting patterns simultaneously (#1005 -- see `hygiene.md` `## Surface Conflicts`)\n- ⊗ Debugging by guess-and-check: fixing before reproducing, treating the first plausible hypothesis as confirmed, or presenting a duration/exit-status as a root cause (#1621 -- see `debugging.md`)\n"
+      "body": "# Coding Guidelines\n\nSoftware development specific guidelines for AI agents.\n\nLegend (from RFC2119): !=MUST, ~=SHOULD, ≉=SHOULD NOT, ⊗=MUST NOT, ?=MAY.\n\n**⚠️ See also** (load only when needed):\n- [../main.md](../../main.md) - General AI behavior and agent persona\n- [PROJECT.md](../../PROJECT.md) - For project-specific overrides\n- [../tools/telemetry.md](../tools/telemetry.md) - When implementing logging/tracing/metrics\n\n## Code Organization\n\n**Documentation:**\n- ! All *.md in `docs/` directory (except README.md, AGENTS.md, WARP.md)\n- ! Prior tasks/plans in `history/`\n\n**Filenames:**\n- ~ Use hyphens not underscores (unless language idiom)\n\n**Secrets:**\n- ! ALL secrets in `secrets/` dir as .env files\n- ⊗ Secrets in code\n\n## Code Search\n\n- ! use `rg`, or `ast-grep` (when available) instead of grep\n- ! Use Warp's built-in grep (which is rg) when running on warp\n- ~ Install if missing\n- ? Fall back to `grep` command only if tools cannot be installed\n\n## Version Control\n\nSee [../scm/git.md](../scm/git.md) for:\n- Commit conventions (Conventional Commits)\n- Safety rules (no force-push without permission)\n- Branch workflows\n\n## Code Design\n\n**Modularity:**\n- ! One responsibility per file/module\n- ~ Files <300 lines ideal; <500 lines recommended; <1000 lines a review trigger — split when exceeded unless genuinely single-responsibility (size is a smell, not a hard cap; #1488)\n- ! Explicit scope in task descriptions\n- ~ DRY: extract shared abstractions when logic is duplicated across 2+ call sites\n- ⊗ Copy-paste logic with minor variations — parameterise instead\n\n**Dependency Direction:**\n- ⊗ Circular imports between modules/packages\n- ~ Layered architecture: high-level modules depend on low-level ones, never the reverse\n- ! Use dependency inversion (interfaces/protocols) to break coupling across layers\n- See [hygiene.md](hygiene.md) for detection tools (madge, pydeps, Go compiler)\n\n**Contract-First:**\n- ! Define interfaces/types/protocols before implementation\n- ! Changes to public interfaces require explicit versioning or deprecation path\n- ! Document all public API contracts clearly\n\n**Immutability:**\n- ~ Prefer immutable data + pure functions\n- ~ When mutation needed, use narrow owned scopes (context managers, RAII)\n- ⊗ Global or singleton mutable state (almost always)\n\n**Error Handling:**\n- ~ Prefer Result/Option types or explicit exceptions over None/null/undefined\n- ! Document possible exceptions/error codes for all public functions\n- ! Validate all inputs at API boundaries\n- ⊗ Trust caller without validation\n- ⊗ Empty catch/except/recover blocks that swallow errors silently\n- ⊗ Returning neutral/zero values (None, {}, [], 0, false, \"\") to mask errors — propagate explicitly\n- ⊗ Log-and-continue: catching an error and proceeding as if it didn't happen, unless provably non-fatal and documented\n- See [hygiene.md](hygiene.md) for full error-hiding anti-pattern catalogue\n\n**Readability:**\n- ! Follow language idioms strictly\n- ! Meaningful names over short names\n- ! Comments explain **why**, code shows **what**\n- ⊗ Clever code over clear code\n\n## Quality Standards\n\n**General:**\n- ! Run all relevant checks (lint, fmt, quality, build, test) before submitting changes\n- ⊗ Claim checks passed without running them\n- ! If checks cannot run, explicitly state why and what would have been executed\n- ~ Prioritize code quality and readability over backwards compatibility\n\n**Testing:**\n- ! Implementation is INCOMPLETE until tests written AND `task test:coverage` passes\n- See [../coding/testing.md](../coding/testing.md) for universal requirements\n\n**Security:**\n- ! Apply baseline security standards to every project from day one\n- See [../coding/security.md](../coding/security.md) for input validation, authn/authz, secrets, dependency, TOCTOU / mutable-external-resource rules (#1938), and agent-specific threats (#661)\n\n**Codebase Hygiene:**\n- See [hygiene.md](hygiene.md) for: dead code removal, circular dependency detection, error hiding patterns, legacy/deprecated code cleanup\n\n**Telemetry:**\n- See [../tools/telemetry.md](../tools/telemetry.md) for recommendations\n- ~ Structured logging for production\n- ~ Error tracking (Sentry.io or equivalent)\n- ? Distributed tracing for complex systems\n\n## Fail Loud: Completion Claims Require Outcome Verification (#1006)\n\nThe failure mode is the agent stating completion at the level of **intent** (\"I ran the migration\", \"the tests pass\", \"the feature works\") rather than at the level of **outcome verification** (\"all 167 records migrated, 0 skipped\", \"42 tests collected, 42 passed, 0 skipped, 0 xfailed\", \"the edge case asked about was reproduced and now returns the expected value\"). Outcome-blind completion claims hide silent skips, swallowed exceptions, suppressed errors, and unverified edge cases behind successful-sounding language. The example from the source: a database migration that completed \"successfully\" had silently skipped 14% of records on a constraint violation; the skip was logged but not surfaced; the bad reports were discovered 11 days later.\n\nThis rule is the OPERATIONAL complement to the EPISTEMIC honesty rules elsewhere in the framework (`main.md` morals section: don't present speculation as fact; label unverified claims). Morals.md says \"don't lie\". Fail-loud says \"count the records, check the logs, run the edge case, **then** claim completion.\" It is also the output-side complement to goal-gate-determinism (the gate specifies what evidence is required) and machine-verifiable-spec (verification commands prevent silent skips) -- without fail-loud, an agent can satisfy the letter of a gate (\"tests pass\") while hiding the gap (\"some tests were skipped\").\n\n- ! Before claiming a batch operation succeeded, MUST verify the record count and surface it in the claim (\"migrated 167/167 records, 0 skipped, 0 errored\" -- not \"migration completed\")\n- ! Before claiming \"tests pass\", MUST report the count of collected / passed / skipped / xfailed / errored tests (\"42 collected, 42 passed, 0 skipped\" -- not \"tests pass\"). A skipped or xfailed test is NOT a passing test for the purpose of this claim\n- ! Before claiming \"the feature works\", MUST report the specific edge case that was verified (if the user asked about a specific edge case, that edge case MUST be in the verification report; \"the happy path works\" is not equivalent to \"the feature works\")\n- ! Before claiming a migration / data transform / batch job completed, MUST check the error log AND the skip log AND the constraint-violation surface; surface the counts even when zero (\"0 skipped, 0 errored\" is the load-bearing claim, not silence)\n- ! When uncertainty exists about whether something worked, MUST surface the uncertainty explicitly (\"the migration completed and reported success but I have not verified the per-record count -- recommend running `<verification-command>` before declaring done\")\n- ⊗ MUST NOT claim \"tests pass\" when any test was skipped, xfailed, or run with errors suppressed -- report the full counts instead\n- ⊗ MUST NOT claim \"migration completed\" / \"batch succeeded\" / \"job finished\" without checking and reporting the per-record outcome counts\n- ⊗ MUST NOT claim \"feature works\" when only the happy path was verified -- name the edge case that was tested, or surface that it wasn't\n- ⊗ MUST NOT use successful-sounding completion phrasing to paper over uncertainty -- default to surfacing uncertainty, not hiding it\n- ⊗ MUST NOT suppress error output (`2>$null`, `2>/dev/null`, `try/except: pass` around the verification command) and then claim completion based on the resulting silence\n\n- ! Before claiming \"feature complete\", \"ready for real users\", \"production-ready\", or equivalent area-complete language for a surface that has open graduations (Now+Later dual-path locks; #2899), MUST name the open `graduationRef`s, **or** explicitly state that graduation review was skipped and why — otherwise the claim is outcome-blind under this rule\n- ⊗ MUST NOT claim \"feature complete\" / \"production-ready\" / \"ready for real users\" for an area with open graduations without naming those `graduationRef`s or an explicit skip-with-reason\n\nThe rule applies to agent completion claims during task execution. It applies equally to claims to the user, claims in commit messages, claims in PR bodies, claims in CHANGELOG entries, and claims in status messages to a parent agent. A short, honest \"the migration completed; I did not verify the per-record count\" is strictly preferred over a confident \"migration completed successfully\" that hides the gap.\n\n**Cross-references:** strategies discuss/probe Graduation dual-path locks (#2899); `## Quality Standards` above (`⊗ Claim checks passed without running them` -- the sibling rule that this expands from process to outcome); `hygiene.md` `## Error Handling: No Hiding` (the same hiding pattern at the code-write level, not the claim level); `skills/deft-directive-pre-pr/SKILL.md` (pre-PR verification claims); `skills/deft-directive-build/SKILL.md` Step 4 Quality Gates (task-completion claims); `skills/deft-directive-review-cycle/SKILL.md` (the review-cycle skill explicitly checks for hidden incompleteness in fix-batch completion claims).\n\n## Calling LLM APIs (#481)\n\nWhen the project calls LLM APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Cohere, local models, etc.) or builds agentic functionality, the architectural standards in `patterns/llm-app.md` apply alongside the coding rules above. In the directive maintainer repo this section is **guidance for consumer projects** — provider names are illustrative labels under the framework instruction hierarchy, not runtime SDK surfaces (#2414; see `meta/security.md` `## Informational AppSec findings`). The short form:\n\n- ! User input is NEVER placed in the system prompt; the system prompt is the trust boundary\n- ! External content is ALWAYS wrapped in explicit delimiters (`<user_input>`, `<document>`, `<tool_result>`) and surfaces its trust tier\n- ! Tool call arguments are validated against a schema BEFORE execution (the LLM is a confused deputy)\n- ! LLM outputs are validated against expected schemas before being acted upon (no eval-of-output, no shell-of-output, no SQL-of-output)\n- ⊗ MUST NOT write LLM outputs back into the retrieval corpus in the same session without validation (RAG poisoning vector)\n\nSee [../patterns/llm-app.md](../patterns/llm-app.md) for the full standards: prompt construction, trust tiers, tool/function-call validation, RAG hygiene, output handling, multi-agent orchestration, and LLM-specific observability. See [../tools/telemetry.md](../tools/telemetry.md) `## LLM-specific observability (#481)` for the matching observability surface.\n\n## Debugging and Root-Cause Investigation (#1621)\n\nWhen a bug, failure, or unexpected behaviour needs diagnosis, the root-cause standards in `debugging.md` apply. The short form:\n\n- ! No fixes without root-cause investigation first (the Iron Law)\n- ! Reproduce the failure consistently before proposing a fix — a non-reproducible bug is not yet understood\n- ! Every factual claim cites evidence; an uncited claim is a `[HYPOTHESIS]`, not a finding (evidence before narrative)\n- ! Runtime/config values are proven from the runtime, never inferred from source code (config is not code)\n- ⊗ MUST NOT present a duration or an exit status (\"slow because phase X took N minutes\", \"failed because it timed out\") as a root cause — name a mechanism (no tautologies)\n- ! After 3 failed distinct fixes, STOP and escalate for architectural review (the 3-fix gate)\n\nSee [debugging.md](debugging.md) for the full four-phase process, evidence discipline, Fact vs Hypothesis labeling (#1580), the observability-gap loop, and the rationalization table. For a sustained multi-agent investigation posture, see the `deft-directive-debug` skill.\n\n## Build Automation\n\n**Taskfile:**\n- ! Use Task ([go-task](https://taskfile.dev)) for all repeatable operations\n- ! If `task` not found, attempt to install go-task\n- ! If installation fails, stop and ask user for help\n- See [../tools/taskfile.md](../tools/taskfile.md) for standards and common commands\n\n**Toolchain Validation:**\n- See [../coding/toolchain.md](../coding/toolchain.md) for rules on verifying required tools are installed before implementation begins\n\n**Build Output Validation:**\n- See [../coding/build-output.md](../coding/build-output.md) for rules on verifying `dist/` artifacts and non-compiled assets after custom build scripts run\n\n## Change Management\n\n**Impact Awareness:**\n- ! Before changing shared code, identify affected downstream modules/files\n- ~ Prefer additive changes (new functions, fields with defaults) over breaking renames\n- ! Make small, reversible changes\n- ! Explain impact and migration path for breaking changes\n\n**Production Safety:**\n- ! Assume production impact unless stated otherwise\n- ! Call out risk when touching: auth, billing, data, APIs, build systems\n- ⊗ Silent breaking behavior\n- ~ Test changes in staging/dev environment when possible\n\n## Language-Specific Guidelines\n\n**Languages:**\n- C++: [../languages/cpp.md](../languages/cpp.md)\n- Go: [../languages/go.md](../languages/go.md)\n- Office.js: [../languages/officejs.md](../languages/officejs.md)\n- Python: [../languages/python.md](../languages/python.md)\n- TypeScript: [../languages/typescript.md](../languages/typescript.md)\n- VBA: [../languages/vba.md](../languages/vba.md)\n\n**Interface Types:**\n- CLI: [../interfaces/cli.md](../interfaces/cli.md)\n- TUI: [../interfaces/tui.md](../interfaces/tui.md)\n- Web: [../interfaces/web.md](../interfaces/web.md)\n- REST API: [../interfaces/rest.md](../interfaces/rest.md)\n\n## Development Workflow\n\n**Localhost:**\n- No permission needed for curl localhost\n\n**Plans:**\n- ~ Create both:\n  1. Warp plan (using `create_plan` tool)\n  2. Archive copy in `history/plan-YYYY-MM-DD-description.md`\n\n## Project Context\n\n- ! Check [PROJECT.md](../../PROJECT.md) for project-specific overrides\n- ~ Inspect project config (package.json, pyproject.toml, etc.) for available scripts\n- ! Follow project-specific testing, coverage, and quality requirements\n\n## Anti-Patterns\n\n- ⊗ Secrets in code or version control\n- ⊗ Claiming checks passed without running them\n- ⊗ Single files mixing multiple responsibilities (large line count, e.g. >1000 lines, is a trigger to check cohesion — not a defect by itself; #1488)\n- ⊗ Skipping quality checks\n- ⊗ Breaking changes without explicit approval\n- ⊗ Using `grep` command when `rg` or Warp grep available\n- ⊗ Implementing code without tests\n- ⊗ Claiming \"done\" before running test:coverage\n- ⊗ Ignoring coverage drops\n- ⊗ Weak types (`any`, `interface{}`, untyped `object`) where concrete types are knowable\n- ⊗ Dead code: unused functions, unreachable branches, stale feature flags, commented-out blocks\n- ⊗ Error hiding: empty catch blocks, silent fallbacks, swallowed exceptions\n- ⊗ Circular imports between modules\n- ⊗ Duplicate logic across 2+ call sites without shared abstraction\n- ⊗ Outcome-blind completion claims: \"tests pass\" with skipped tests, \"migration completed\" without per-record counts, \"feature works\" without naming the verified edge case (#1006 -- see `## Fail Loud` above)\n- ⊗ Outcome-blind \"feature complete\" / \"production-ready\" claims that ignore open graduations (`graduationRef`s) without naming them or an explicit skip (#2899 / #1006 -- see `## Fail Loud` above)\n- ⊗ Averaging contradicting codebase patterns: writing new code that satisfies both of two conflicting patterns simultaneously (#1005 -- see `hygiene.md` `## Surface Conflicts`)\n- ⊗ Debugging by guess-and-check: fixing before reproducing, treating the first plausible hypothesis as confirmed, or presenting a duration/exit-status as a root cause (#1621 -- see `debugging.md`)\n"
     },
     {
       "id": "coding-002",
@@ -827,6 +827,30 @@
       "path": "coding/coding.md",
       "body": null
     },
+    {
+      "id": "coding-097",
+      "tier": "MUST",
+      "domain": "coding",
+      "text": "Before claiming \"feature complete\", \"ready for real users\", \"production-ready\", or equivalent area-complete language for a surface that has open graduations (Now+Later dual-path locks; #2899), MUST name the open `graduationRef`s, or explicitly state that graduation review was skipped and why — otherwise the claim is outcome-blind under Fail Loud (#1006)",
+      "path": "coding/coding.md",
+      "body": null
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "coding-098",
+      "tier": "MUST_NOT",
+      "domain": "coding",
+      "text": "MUST NOT claim \"feature complete\" / \"production-ready\" / \"ready for real users\" for an area with open graduations without naming those `graduationRef`s or an explicit skip-with-reason (#2899 / #1006)",
+      "path": "coding/coding.md",
+      "body": null
+    },
+    {
+      "id": "coding-099",
+      "tier": "MUST_NOT",
+      "domain": "coding",
+      "text": "Outcome-blind \"feature complete\" / \"production-ready\" claims that ignore open graduations (`graduationRef`s) without naming them or an explicit skip (#2899 / #1006 -- see `## Fail Loud` above)",
+      "path": "coding/coding.md",
+      "body": null
+    },
     {
       "id": "debugging-001",
       "tier": "MUST",