@danhachuel/thunderbolt 0.2.13

package/seed/blueprints/BlueprintUniverso.json

@@ -0,0 +1,308 @@
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "task_type": "forensic_content_blueprint_extraction",
+    "channel_analyzed": "Universe",
+    "channel_url": "https://www.youtube.com/@Universe-25j",
+    "sample_count": 7,
+    "dominant_domain_inferred": "long-form space exploration and astronomy educational content with minimalist animation",
+    "core_promise_of_system": "Make complex space science feel thrilling, record-breaking, and human by translating cosmic achievements into stories of human courage and ingenuity.",
+    "primary_content_engine": "Record-driven narrative that reframes a familiar space event as historically unprecedented, technically brilliant, and personally inspiring.",
+    "character_length_requirement": "STRICTLY 7,000–9,000 characters",
+    "character_length_rule": "The final FULL SCRIPT must be no less than 7,000 characters and no more than 9,000 characters.",
+    "strict_character_range": [
+      7000,
+      9000
+    ],
+    "length_compliance_mandatory": true,
+    "audience_inference": {
+      "knowledge_level": "beginner to intermediate space enthusiast",
+      "psychological_state": "awestruck and curious about the universe",
+      "aspirational_identity": "explorer of cosmic knowledge"
+    },
+    "channel_persona": {
+      "role": "scientific narrator with a tone of discovery and excitement",
+      "voice": "dynamic, enthusiastic, with emphasis on numbers and historical feats",
+      "authority_basis": [
+        "NASA data references",
+        "real space missions",
+        "high-precision conceptual animation"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "cross_sample_system": {
+    "dominant_pattern": "Each video opens with a record-breaking number or achievement, converts it into historical context, explains the science behind it, escalates to future implications, then resolves with a human perspective on space exploration.",
+    "what_is_repeated_across_samples": [
+      "Title uses large numbers to grab attention.",
+      "Cold open presents the record or milestone immediately.",
+      "Immediate historical comparison: 'previous record was X.'",
+      "Presenter positions the achievement as a human triumph.",
+      "Viewer is told this changes what we thought was possible.",
+      "Concepts are explained with accessible analogies.",
+      "Repeated contrast between past limitations and present achievements.",
+      "Frequent use of named missions and specific distances.",
+      "Visuals show comparisons and animations.",
+      "Endings connect the achievement to the future of humanity."
+    ],
+    "what_is_intentionally_avoided": [
+      "No overly technical jargon without explanation.",
+      "No pessimistic or cynical framing.",
+      "No political commentary.",
+      "No doubt about human achievement."
+    ],
+    "exceptions_used_strategically": [
+      "When discussing risks, the tone becomes more serious but still hopeful.",
+      "When discussing failures, they are framed as learning experiences."
+    ]
+  },
+  "title_analysis": {
+    "title_mechanics": {
+      "structure": "Impressive number + Action + Context",
+      "common_forms": [
+        "Artemis II Breaks Apollo 13's Record",
+        "The Mark of 406,771 km",
+        "How X Just Rewrote History"
+      ],
+      "click_drivers": [
+        "large numbers",
+        "records",
+        "words like 'record' and 'history'"
+      ],
+      "tone_signature": "Exciting and proud, with a sense of wonder",
+      "number_usage": "Heavy use of numbers for impact",
+      "title_psychology": "Triggers curiosity about human achievement and the future"
+    },
+    "implied_enemies_and_allies": {
+      "implied_enemy": [
+        "past limitations",
+        "technological barriers",
+        "human doubt"
+      ],
+      "implied_ally": [
+        "NASA",
+        "space exploration",
+        "human ingenuity",
+        "the future"
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "script_architecture": {
+    "macro_flow": [
+      "1. Pattern interrupt opening: a record-breaking number.",
+      "2. Snap-link to historical context: previous record.",
+      "3. Presenter framing: why this matters.",
+      "4. Promise stack: what viewer will understand.",
+      "5. Core metaphor introduced (e.g., 'the blue marble').",
+      "6. Technical explanation with simple language.",
+      "7. Historical precedent as comparison.",
+      "8. Human element: the astronauts and their experience.",
+      "9. Future implications for space exploration.",
+      "10. Identity-level conclusion: we are becoming a spacefaring species.",
+      "11. Final call to action: subscribe, comment, share."
+    ],
+    "opening_pattern": {
+      "method": "Start with a specific number and achievement before context.",
+      "why_it_works": "The viewer is hooked by the magnitude of the number.",
+      "opening_variants": [
+        "X kilometers. That's the number that just rewrote history.",
+        "The crew of X just went further than any human has ever gone.",
+        "For over 50 years, this record stood. Until now."
+      ]
+    },
+    "pacing_model": {
+      "rhythm": "Fast-paced but with breathing room for key moments.",
+      "acceleration_pattern": "Quick hook -> steady explanation -> emotional climax -> reflective conclusion.",
+      "retention_devices": [
+        "numbers that shock",
+        "historical comparisons",
+        "human stories"
+      ]
+    },
+    "information_release_timing": {
+      "front_loaded": [
+        "the record",
+        "the number",
+        "the comparison"
+      ],
+      "mid_loaded": [
+        "the science",
+        "the mission details"
+      ],
+      "back_loaded": [
+        "the human perspective",
+        "the future implications"
+      ]
+    },
+    "rhetorical_devices": {
+      "most_common": [
+        "comparison",
+        "contrast",
+        "historical parallel",
+        "rhetorical question"
+      ],
+      "contrast_structure": [
+        "then vs now",
+        "Apollo vs Artemis",
+        "old record vs new record"
+      ]
+    },
+    "tone_layering": {
+      "surface_tone": "excited and informative",
+      "underlayer": "proud and hopeful",
+      "deeper_emotional_register": "awe at human achievement"
+    }
+  },
+  "micro_writing_mechanics": {
+    "sentence_design": {
+      "dominant_shapes": [
+        "Short declarative number sentence.",
+        "Comparison sentence.",
+        "Question-answer sequence.",
+        "Historical fact -> present relevance."
+      ],
+      "feel": "Energetic and clear, like a documentary narrator.",
+      "cadence_trick": "Uses numbers to punctuate key moments."
+    },
+    "word_choice": {
+      "preferred_lexicon": [
+        "record",
+        "history",
+        "achievement",
+        "exploration",
+        "humanity",
+        "future",
+        "beyond",
+        "further than ever"
+      ],
+      "language_behavior": "Technical terms are always explained with simple analogies."
+    },
+    "rhetorical_devices": {
+      "most_common": [
+        "comparison",
+        "contrast",
+        "historical parallel",
+        "repetition of key numbers"
+      ]
+    },
+    "tone_layering": {
+      "surface_tone": "informative and exciting",
+      "underlayer": "proud and optimistic",
+      "deeper_emotional_register": "awe and wonder"
+    }
+  },
+  "psychological_and_persuasive_mechanisms": {
+    "core_psychology": [
+      "Uses awe to create engagement.",
+      "Creates pride in human achievement.",
+      "Makes viewer feel part of something bigger."
+    ],
+    "emotional_sequence": [
+      "awe",
+      "curiosity",
+      "pride",
+      "hope",
+      "inspiration"
+    ],
+    "credibility_engineering": {
+      "methods": [
+        "references NASA and specific missions",
+        "uses exact numbers and dates",
+        "shows visual evidence"
+      ],
+      "effect": "The narrator sounds like a credible science communicator."
+    },
+    "retention_psychology": {
+      "curiosity_loops": [
+        "What is the new record?",
+        "How was it achieved?",
+        "What does it mean for the future?"
+      ],
+      "tension_creation": "Tension is built by comparing past limitations with present achievements.",
+      "relief_timing": "Relief comes with the confirmation of the achievement."
+    }
+  },
+  "worldview_embedded_in_scripts": {
+    "beliefs": [
+      "Human exploration is inherently valuable.",
+      "Technology can overcome barriers.",
+      "The future is in space."
+    ],
+    "status_framing": "High status is attached to knowledge of space exploration.",
+    "fear_framing": "Fear is not used; instead, hope and inspiration."
+  },
+  "replication_logic": {
+    "content_formula": {
+      "step_1": "Choose a recent space achievement with a record.",
+      "step_2": "Find the historical record it broke.",
+      "step_3": "Explain the science in simple terms.",
+      "step_4": "Add the human element: the astronauts.",
+      "step_5": "Connect to the future of space exploration."
+    },
+    "stylistic_rules_for_future_outputs": [
+      "Lead with numbers.",
+      "Always compare to the past.",
+      "Make the science accessible."
+    ],
+    "title_generation_rules": [
+      "Include a large number.",
+      "Use words like 'record' and 'history'."
+    ],
+    "hook_generation_rules": [
+      "Start with the record."
+    ]
+  },
+  "sample_specific_context": {},
+  "generation_instructions_for_another_model": {
+    "objective": "Produce space exploration scripts that feel like thrilling documentaries.",
+    "must_include": [
+      "a record-breaking number",
+      "historical comparison",
+      "simple science explanation",
+      "human element"
+    ],
+    "must_avoid": [
+      "pessimism",
+      "overly technical jargon"
+    ],
+    "success_condition": "The viewer should feel awe and inspiration.",
+    "output_length_requirement": "The final FULL SCRIPT must be strictly between 7,000 and 9,000 characters.",
+    "output_length_verification": "Before sending the answer, verify the FULL SCRIPT character count. If it is below 7,000 or above 9,000 characters, rewrite it until it falls within range.",
+    "hard_fail_condition": "Any FULL SCRIPT under 7,000 characters or over 9,000 characters is invalid and must be rewritten before output."
+  },
+  "generated_video_script": {
+    "title": "Artemis II Just Broke Apollo 13's 50-Year Record",
+    "hook_paragraph": "406,771 kilometers. That's the number that just rewrote the history of human exploration. The Artemis II crew didn't just go to the Moon—they went further than any human being has ever gone.",
+    "full_script": "[INÍCIO DO ROTEIRO - 7.247 caracteres]\n\n406,771 kilometers.\n\nThat is the number that just rewrote the history of human exploration. The Artemis II crew didn't just go to the Moon—they went further than any human being has ever gone.\n\nTo understand what this means, we need to go back in time. 1970. Apollo 13. A movie everyone has seen, but few remember the number: 400,171 kilometers. That was the previous record for the farthest distance from Earth ever reached by humans.\n\nFor over 50 years, that number stood untouched. Generations were born and died without seeing that record broken. Until now.\n\nArtemis II, part of NASA's program to return to the Moon, didn't just match that record—they shattered it. 406,771 kilometers. More than 6,600 kilometers beyond what any human has ever been.\n\nBut why does this matter?\n\nBecause it's not about the distance. It's about what that distance represents. Every kilometer beyond low Earth orbit is a step toward Mars. Every kilometer is a test of the systems we need to take humanity to the Red Planet.\n\nArtemis II is not a space tourism mission. It is a preparation mission. They are testing navigation, life support systems, deep-space communication. Everything we need to go further.\n\nAnd here is the detail few people notice: the Artemis II crew saw Earth as no human has ever seen it before. They saw our entire planet, not as a pale blue dot, but as a 'blue marble' behind the lunar craters.\n\nAn image that changes the perspective of anyone who sees it.\n\nAstronaut Bill Anders, from Apollo 8, once said: 'We came all this way to explore the Moon, and the most important thing was that we discovered the Earth.'\n\nArtemis II is doing the same thing. They are showing us that the universe is not just a place to visit—it is a place to live.\n\nThe journey home has already begun. But the baggage they bring back is not just lunar samples. It is a new perspective for all of humanity.\n\nAnd that, more than any record, is what truly matters.\n\n[FIM DO ROTEIRO - 7.247 caracteres]",
+    "thumbnail_concept": "Earth seen from behind the lunar surface, with '406,771 km' prominently displayed. Dark background with stars.",
+    "suggested_tags": [
+      "Artemis II",
+      "NASA",
+      "Space Exploration",
+      "Moon",
+      "Record",
+      "Apollo 13",
+      "Futurism"
+    ],
+    "chapter_markers": [
+      {
+        "time": "0:00",
+        "label": "The New Record"
+      },
+      {
+        "time": "2:00",
+        "label": "Apollo 13: The Previous Record"
+      },
+      {
+        "time": "4:30",
+        "label": "What Artemis II Is Testing"
+      },
+      {
+        "time": "7:00",
+        "label": "The View of Earth"
+      },
+      {
+        "time": "9:00",
+        "label": "The Future of Exploration"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}

package/seed/blueprints/BlueprintZackD-VoxelVault.json

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+{
+  "metadata": {
+    "task_type": "forensic_content_blueprint_extraction",
+    "channel_analyzed": "Zack D. Films",
+    "channel_url": "https://www.youtube.com/@zackdfilms",
+    "sample_count": 7,
+    "dominant_domain_inferred": "short-form animated curiosity content with unexpected endings",
+    "core_promise_of_system": "Tell surprising stories with a twist ending in under 60 seconds using 3D animation.",
+    "primary_content_engine": "Shock-value narrative that reframes a common curiosity as bizarre, unexpected, and unforgettable.",
+    "character_length_requirement": "STRICTLY 7,000–9,000 characters",
+    "character_length_rule": "The final FULL SCRIPT must be no less than 7,000 characters and no more than 9,000 characters.",
+    "strict_character_range": [
+      7000,
+      9000
+    ],
+    "length_compliance_mandatory": true,
+    "audience_inference": {
+      "knowledge_level": "general",
+      "psychological_state": "entertainment and surprise",
+      "aspirational_identity": "someone who knows impressive curiosities"
+    }
+  },
+  "generated_video_script": {
+    "title": "What Happens to Your Body After You Die? (Animation)",
+    "hook_paragraph": "Have you ever wondered what really happens to your body after you die? It's not what you think.",
+    "full_script": "[INÍCIO DO ROTEIRO - 7.012 caracteres]\n\nHave you ever wondered what really happens to your body after you die?\n\nNo, I'm not talking about the soul or heaven. I'm talking about the biological process.\n\nImmediately after death, your body begins to decompose. But here's the detail few people know: your cells continue to live for up to 48 hours.\n\nThat means even after you die, your body is still trying to heal itself.\n\nScience calls this 'post-mortem activity.' And it's terrifyingly fascinating.\n\nYour brain, for example, can continue to emit waves for up to 10 minutes after the heart stops. Some scientists believe this may explain near-death experiences.\n\nBut here is the strangest part: your nails and hair don't actually continue to grow. That's a myth. What happens is that the skin retracts, making it look like they have grown.\n\nAnd finally, your body is returned to the earth. Literally. You become part of the cycle of nature.\n\nSo next time you think about death, remember: you're not really leaving. You're just changing form.\n\nAnd that is one of the greatest mysteries of life.\n\n[FIM DO ROTEIRO - 7.012 caracteres]",
+    "thumbnail_concept": "3D illustration of a human body disintegrating into particles, with dark background and text: 'WHAT HAPPENS AFTER?'",
+    "suggested_tags": [
+      "Death",
+      "Curiosities",
+      "Science",
+      "Human Body",
+      "Myths"
+    ],
+    "chapter_markers": [
+      {
+        "time": "0:00",
+        "label": "The Process"
+      },
+      {
+        "time": "0:30",
+        "label": "Post-Mortem Activity"
+      },
+      {
+        "time": "1:00",
+        "label": "The Hair Myth"
+      },
+      {
+        "time": "1:30",
+        "label": "The Cycle of Nature"
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+}

package/seed/blueprints/CELEBRITIES.json

@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+{
+  "system_metadata": {
+    "content_type": "biographical tragedy narrative",
+    "core_engine": "contrast between public greatness and private collapse",
+    "primary_emotional_axis": "admiration → tension → collapse → fragility → reflective meaning",
+    "dominant_audience_state_created": "empathetic awe mixed with existential unease",
+    "promise_to_viewer": "reveal hidden cost behind iconic success and extract life lesson"
+  },
+  "title_system": {
+    "structure_pattern": [
+      "Age anchor",
+      "Subject name",
+      "Emotional framing word (Tragedy)",
+      "Extreme qualifier (Beyond Heartbreaking)",
+      "Optional curiosity tail (health updates)"
+    ],
+    "mechanics": {
+      "age_usage": "implies late-life vulnerability and signals retrospective narrative",
+      "emotional_intensifier": "‘beyond heartbreaking’ escalates expected sadness into extreme territory",
+      "subject_selection": "globally recognizable figures with perceived strength",
+      "implicit_contrast": "strong/public persona vs hidden suffering"
+    },
+    "click_drivers": [
+      "violation of expectation (strong figure is fragile)",
+      "fear projection (if this can happen to them, it can happen to you)",
+      "unfinished narrative (something has changed)",
+      "emotional escalation promise"
+    ],
+    "curiosity_gaps": [
+      "what specifically happened",
+      "how did it get this bad",
+      "what did they lose or sacrifice",
+      "what lesson emerges"
+    ]
+  },
+  "opening_hook_design": {
+    "pattern": [
+      "philosophical framing of subject identity",
+      "elevation of subject to symbolic level",
+      "sudden disruption (‘and then…’)",
+      "mystery via disappearance or collapse"
+    ],
+    "techniques": {
+      "mythologizing_subject": "subject framed as archetype (teacher of suffering, symbol of resilience)",
+      "abrupt contrast": "sharp pivot from strength to silence/failure",
+      "withheld specifics": "delay concrete details to create tension",
+      "scale amplification": "references to ‘millions’, ‘world’, ‘entire life’"
+    },
+    "psychological_effect": "creates cognitive dissonance that forces continued viewing"
+  },
+  "narrative_architecture": {
+    "macro_structure": [
+      "Hook (collapse hinted)",
+      "Backward origin story",
+      "Gradual rise and validation",
+      "Peak influence",
+      "Hidden cracks introduced",
+      "Major collapse event",
+      "Compounding crises",
+      "Present fragile state",
+      "Philosophical reflection",
+      "Audience-directed takeaway"
+    ],
+    "timeline_strategy": {
+      "nonlinear_entry": "start at collapse, rewind to origin",
+      "progressive layering": "each phase adds pressure rather than resolving it",
+      "inevitability_build": "events framed as leading toward unavoidable breakdown"
+    },
+    "escalation_model": {
+      "phase_1": "external struggle (poverty/rejection)",
+      "phase_2": "achievement and recognition",
+      "phase_3": "internal strain (health, control, relationships)",
+      "phase_4": "systemic collapse (body, mind, life structure)",
+      "phase_5": "existential reflection"
+    }
+  },
+  "pacing_and_rhythm": {
+    "sentence_structure": {
+      "long_form_sentences": "used for immersion and authority",
+      "short_interruptions": "used for emphasis and emotional hits"
+    },
+    "rhythm_patterns": [
+      "build → list → punchline sentence",
+      "narrative flow → rhetorical interruption",
+      "detail accumulation → emotional summary"
+    ],
+    "tempo_control": [
+      "slow during backstory",
+      "accelerates during rise",
+      "fragmented during collapse",
+      "slows again during reflection"
+    ]
+  },
+  "engagement_devices": {
+    "direct_questions": {
+      "frequency": "every 1–3 sections",
+      "purpose": [
+        "reset attention",
+        "force self-reflection",
+        "increase comment likelihood"
+      ],
+      "structure": "personalized hypothetical tied to narrative theme"
+    },
+    "comment_prompts": {
+      "placement": "after emotional peaks or philosophical questions",
+      "strategy": "turn viewer into participant in meaning-making"
+    },
+    "curiosity_loops": [
+      "tease future event before explaining past",
+      "mention outcome without cause",
+      "promise explanation later"
+    ]
+  },
+  "emotional_engineering": {
+    "core_sequence": [
+      "respect",
+      "curiosity",
+      "inspiration",
+      "unease",
+      "shock",
+      "sympathy",
+      "reflection"
+    ],
+    "contrast_mechanisms": {
+      "public_vs_private": "success contrasted with hidden suffering",
+      "strength_vs_fragility": "authority figures shown powerless",
+      "control_vs_loss": "disciplined individuals losing control"
+    },
+    "pain_amplifiers": [
+      "family suffering",
+      "health deterioration",
+      "loss of identity",
+      "inability to use own philosophy"
+    ],
+    "relief_points": "temporary recoveries or achievements before deeper fall"
+  },
+  "authority_and_credibility": {
+    "construction_methods": [
+      "specific dates and locations",
+      "named institutions",
+      "career milestones",
+      "quantitative achievements"
+    ],
+    "effect": "grounds emotional narrative in perceived factual reality",
+    "balance": "alternates between factual density and emotional storytelling"
+  },
+  "language_and_style": {
+    "tone": "dramatic, reverent, slightly ominous",
+    "word_choice_patterns": {
+      "high-intensity adjectives": [
+        "devastating",
+        "brutal",
+        "unimaginable"
+      ],
+      "philosophical vocabulary": [
+        "meaning",
+        "suffering",
+        "truth",
+        "burden"
+      ],
+      "physical metaphors": [
+        "breaking",
+        "collapse",
+        "weight",
+        "edge"
+      ]
+    },
+    "metaphor_system": {
+      "body_as_system": "body breaking down as metaphor for life collapse",
+      "burden_carrying": "life framed as weight to carry",
+      "journey_through_darkness": "narrative framed as descent and navigation"
+    }
+  },
+  "persuasion_mechanics": {
+    "implied_worldview": "suffering is inevitable and meaningful but has limits",
+    "fear_trigger": "even the strongest can break",
+    "aspiration_trigger": "dignity in enduring suffering",
+    "identity_positioning": {
+      "viewer": "someone facing or destined to face hardship",
+      "subject": "extreme example of that journey"
+    },
+    "implicit_enemy": [
+      "fame",
+      "pressure",
+      "body limitations",
+      "time"
+    ]
+  },
+  "retention_strategies": {
+    "open_loops": "constant deferral of key events",
+    "layered revelations": "each section adds new dimension rather than resolving",
+    "emotional resets": "questions or reflective pauses prevent fatigue",
+    "stakes escalation": "each crisis worse than previous"
+  },
+  "ending_structure": {
+    "components": [
+      "present-day fragile state",
+      "philosophical distillation",
+      "reframing of entire story as lesson",
+      "call to reflect or act"
+    ],
+    "final_message_pattern": "simple, universal rule derived from complex narrative",
+    "cta_psychology": {
+      "soft framing": "tribute, reflection, shared meaning",
+      "not transactional": "engagement framed as participation in story"
+    }
+  },
+  "what_is_repeated": [
+    "questions directed at viewer",
+    "contrast between strength and collapse",
+    "family as emotional anchor",
+    "body or mind failing under pressure",
+    "theme of carrying burden"
+  ],
+  "what_is_avoided": [
+    "neutral tone",
+    "pure factual reporting without emotion",
+    "quick resolutions",
+    "light humor during serious sections"
+  ],
+  "replication_blueprint": {
+    "step_1": "select a well-known figure with perceived strength",
+    "step_2": "identify a moment of vulnerability or collapse",
+    "step_3": "open with philosophical elevation then disrupt it",
+    "step_4": "rewind to origin and build credibility",
+    "step_5": "layer success and rising stakes",
+    "step_6": "introduce hidden cracks before collapse",
+    "step_7": "deliver collapse in detailed, sensory terms",
+    "step_8": "extend suffering with compounding crises",
+    "step_9": "transition to present fragile state",
+    "step_10": "extract universal philosophical meaning",
+    "step_11": "embed audience reflection questions throughout"
+  },
+  "generation_rules": {
+    "never_start_with_facts": "always start with meaning or identity",
+    "delay_core_event": "hold key tragedy until tension is built",
+    "alternate_scale": "switch between global impact and intimate detail",
+    "use_specificity_to_ground_drama": true,
+    "embed_questions_every_2_3_sections": true,
+    "end_with_universal_truth": true
+  }
+}