@cubis/foundry 0.3.81 → 0.3.83

package/workflows/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/copilot/prompts/debug.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+# Workflow Prompt: /debug
+
+Isolate root cause quickly, apply the smallest safe remediation, and leave behind regression evidence.
+
+Execution contract:
+1. Treat route selection as already resolved by this command; do not begin with skill discovery.
+2. Read `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md`, `ENGINEERING_RULES.md`, `docs/foundation/ARCHITECTURE.md`, and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` in that order when they exist before non-trivial execution.
+Attached skills:
+- Load these exact skill IDs first: `systematic-debugging`, `observability`, `unit-testing`, `typescript-best-practices`, `javascript-best-practices`, `python-best-practices`, `golang-best-practices`, `java-best-practices`, `csharp-best-practices`, `kotlin-best-practices`, `rust-best-practices`, `integration-testing`, `playwright-interactive`, `skill-creator`.
+- Local skill file hints if installed: `.github/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/observability/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/unit-testing/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/typescript-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/javascript-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/python-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/golang-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/java-best-practices/SKILL.md`.
+- Treat the skill bundle as already resolved for this workflow. Do not start with route discovery.
+3. Apply workflow sections in order: When to use, Workflow steps, Context notes, Verification.
+4. Route to the workflow's primary specialist and only add supporting specialists when needed.
+5. If freshness or public comparison matters, run `deep-research` before implementation and use official docs as primary evidence.
+6. Return actions taken, verification evidence, and any gaps.
+
+Workflow source:
+# Debug Workflow
+
+## When to use
+
+Use this when behavior is failing, inconsistent, flaky, or only reproducible under certain conditions.
+
+## Routing
+
+- Primary specialist: `@debugger`
+- Domain implementation support: `@backend-specialist`, `@frontend-specialist`
+- Verification support: `@test-engineer`
+
+## Context notes
+
+- This workflow file, active platform rules, and selected agents or skills guide execution.
+- Attach stack traces, request IDs, traces, repro steps, recent diffs, and environment notes when context is incomplete.
+
+## Skill Routing
+
+- Primary skills: `debugging-strategies`, `error-ux-observability`
+- Supporting skills (optional): `testing-patterns`, `typescript-pro`, `javascript-pro`, `python-pro`, `golang-pro`, `java-pro`, `csharp-pro`, `kotlin-pro`, `rust-pro`, `webapp-testing`, `playwright-e2e`, `skill-creator`
+- Start with `debugging-strategies` for reproduce, isolate, instrument, and verify flow. Add `error-ux-observability` when the failure involves error states, logging, or tracing gaps. Add the dominant language skill for exact code-path analysis, `webapp-testing` or `playwright-e2e` when the failure lives in browser or release verification.
+
+## Workflow steps
+
+1. Reproduce the issue and record expected versus actual behavior.
+2. Narrow the fault domain with the smallest useful evidence.
+3. Fix the confirmed cause with the lowest regression risk.
+4. Add or update the regression proof.
+5. Document any remaining uncertainty or environment-specific gaps.
+
+## Verification
+
+- Re-run the failing scenario first.
+- Run focused regression checks on adjacent high-risk paths.
+- Call out any remaining gaps if the full environment could not be reproduced.
+
+## Output Contract
+
+```yaml
+DEBUG_WORKFLOW_RESULT:
+  primary_agent: debugger
+  supporting_agents: [backend-specialist?, frontend-specialist?, test-engineer?]
+  primary_skills: [debugging-strategies, error-ux-observability]
+  supporting_skills: [testing-patterns?, <language-skill>?, webapp-testing?, playwright-e2e?]
+  reproduction:
+    steps: [<string>]
+    expected_vs_actual: <string>
+  root_cause: <string>
+  remediation:
+    summary: <string>
+    changed_artifacts: [<path-or-artifact>]
+  regression_checks: [<command or test>]
+  follow_up_items: [<string>] | []
+```

package/workflows/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/copilot/prompts/devops.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+# Workflow Prompt: /devops
+
+Plan and execute deployment, CI/CD, incident response, and operational safety changes with rollback controls.
+
+Execution contract:
+1. Treat route selection as already resolved by this command; do not begin with skill discovery.
+2. Read `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md`, `ENGINEERING_RULES.md`, `docs/foundation/ARCHITECTURE.md`, and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` in that order when they exist before non-trivial execution.
+Attached skills:
+- Load these exact skill IDs first: `ci-cd-pipeline`, `kubernetes-deploy`, `observability`, `git-workflow`, `systematic-debugging`, `typescript-best-practices`, `javascript-best-practices`, `python-best-practices`, `golang-best-practices`.
+- Local skill file hints if installed: `.github/skills/ci-cd-pipeline/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/kubernetes-deploy/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/observability/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/git-workflow/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/typescript-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/javascript-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/python-best-practices/SKILL.md`.
+- Treat the skill bundle as already resolved for this workflow. Do not start with route discovery.
+3. Apply workflow sections in order: When to use, Workflow steps, Context notes, Verification.
+4. Route to the workflow's primary specialist and only add supporting specialists when needed.
+5. If freshness or public comparison matters, run `deep-research` before implementation and use official docs as primary evidence.
+6. Return actions taken, verification evidence, and any gaps.
+
+Workflow source:
+# DevOps Workflow
+
+## When to use
+
+Use this for deployment automation, CI/CD pipeline changes, incident response, or infrastructure operations.
+
+## Routing
+
+- Primary specialist: `@devops-engineer`
+- Reliability support: `@sre-engineer`
+- Verification support: `@validator`
+
+## Context notes
+
+- This workflow file, active platform rules, and selected agents or skills guide execution.
+- Attach deployment targets, pipeline configs, incident details, and infrastructure specs.
+
+## Skill Routing
+
+- Primary skills: `devops-engineer`, `ci-cd-pipelines`, `docker-kubernetes`
+- Supporting skills (optional): `sre-engineer`, `observability`, `serverless-patterns`, `git-workflow`, `debugging-strategies`, `typescript-pro`, `javascript-pro`, `python-pro`, `golang-pro`
+- Start with `devops-engineer` for operational patterns. Add `ci-cd-pipelines` for pipeline work, `docker-kubernetes` for container operations, `sre-engineer` for incident response, `serverless-patterns` for serverless infrastructure.
+
+## Workflow steps
+
+1. Assess current state and change scope.
+2. Plan change with rollback strategy.
+3. Apply change in staged manner (dev → staging → production).
+4. Verify health at each stage before proceeding.
+5. Document operational procedures and runbooks.
+
+## Verification
+
+- Change applied successfully with no service degradation.
+- Rollback procedure verified or documented.
+- Monitoring confirms normal operation after change.
+- Runbook updated for new procedures.
+
+## Output Contract
+
+```yaml
+DEVOPS_WORKFLOW_RESULT:
+  primary_agent: devops-engineer
+  supporting_agents: [sre-engineer?, validator?]
+  primary_skills: [devops-engineer, ci-cd-pipelines, docker-kubernetes]
+  supporting_skills: [sre-engineer?, observability?, serverless-patterns?]
+  change:
+    description: <string>
+    blast_radius: <string>
+    rollback_plan: <string>
+  execution:
+    stages_completed: [<string>]
+    health_checks: [<string>]
+  operational_docs: [<string>] | []
+  follow_up_items: [<string>] | []
+```

package/workflows/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/copilot/prompts/implement-track.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+# Workflow Prompt: /implement-track
+
+Execute large work in milestones with explicit quality gates and status updates.
+
+Execution contract:
+1. Treat route selection as already resolved by this command; do not begin with skill discovery.
+2. Read `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md`, `ENGINEERING_RULES.md`, `docs/foundation/ARCHITECTURE.md`, and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` in that order when they exist before non-trivial execution.
+Attached skills:
+- Load these exact skill IDs first: `system-design`, `api-design`, `database-design`, `typescript-best-practices`, `javascript-best-practices`, `python-best-practices`, `golang-best-practices`, `react`, `nextjs`.
+- Local skill file hints if installed: `.github/skills/system-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/api-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/database-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/typescript-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/javascript-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/python-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/golang-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/react/SKILL.md`.
+- Treat the skill bundle as already resolved for this workflow. Do not start with route discovery.
+3. Apply workflow sections in order: When to use, Workflow steps, Context notes, Verification.
+4. Route to the workflow's primary specialist and only add supporting specialists when needed.
+5. If freshness or public comparison matters, run `deep-research` before implementation and use official docs as primary evidence.
+6. Return actions taken, verification evidence, and any gaps.
+
+Workflow source:
+# Implement Track Workflow
+
+## When to use
+
+Use this for large-scale implementation work that spans multiple sessions or milestones and needs progress tracking with quality gates.
+
+## Routing
+
+- Primary coordinator: `@orchestrator`
+- Implementation agents: determined by task domain
+- Quality gate: `@validator`
+
+## Context notes
+
+- This workflow file, active platform rules, and selected agents or skills guide execution.
+- Attach the implementation plan, milestone definitions, and acceptance criteria per milestone.
+- Reuse `docs/specs/<spec-id>/` when present instead of maintaining a separate progress source of truth.
+- Read `ENGINEERING_RULES.md` first and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` next before starting milestone execution. Use `## Build And Validation` for the validated build sequence and `## Key Commands` for test/lint commands.
+
+## Skill Routing
+
+- Primary skills: `system-design`, `api-design`
+- Supporting skills (optional): `database-design`, `typescript-pro`, `javascript-pro`, `python-pro`, `golang-pro`, `react-expert`, `nextjs-developer`
+- Start with `system-design` for milestone planning. Load domain-specific skills per milestone based on implementation needs.
+
+## Workflow steps
+
+1. Review implementation plan and confirm milestone boundaries.
+2. Execute current milestone with focused implementation.
+3. Run quality gate validation at milestone completion.
+4. Update progress tracking and capture status.
+5. Adjust remaining plan, spec traceability, and doc refresh needs based on learnings.
+6. Proceed to next milestone or report completion.
+
+## Verification
+
+- Each milestone has clear acceptance criteria that are verified.
+- Quality gate passed before proceeding to next milestone.
+- Progress tracker updated with evidence of completion.
+- Remaining milestones adjusted for any scope changes.
+
+## Output Contract
+
+```yaml
+IMPLEMENT_TRACK_WORKFLOW_RESULT:
+  primary_agent: orchestrator
+  supporting_agents: [<milestone-agents>]
+  primary_skills: [system-design, api-design]
+  supporting_skills: [database-design?, typescript-pro?, javascript-pro?, python-pro?, golang-pro?, react-expert?, nextjs-developer?]
+  milestones:
+    - id: <milestone-id>
+      description: <string>
+      status: completed | in_progress | pending
+      acceptance_criteria_met: [<string>]
+      validation_evidence: <string>
+  overall_progress: <percentage>
+  scope_changes: [<string>] | []
+  spec_id: <string> | null
+  spec_root: docs/specs/<spec-id> | null
+  traceability_status: complete | partial | blocked
+  doc_impact: none | tech | rules | both
+  follow_up_items: [<string>] | []
+```

package/workflows/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/copilot/prompts/migrate.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+# Workflow Prompt: /migrate
+
+Plan and execute technology migrations, framework upgrades, and dependency updates with rollback safety, incremental verification, and zero-downtime transition.
+
+Execution contract:
+1. Treat route selection as already resolved by this command; do not begin with skill discovery.
+2. Read `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md`, `ENGINEERING_RULES.md`, `docs/foundation/ARCHITECTURE.md`, and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` in that order when they exist before non-trivial execution.
+Attached skills:
+- Load these exact skill IDs first: `system-design`, `code-review`, `unit-testing`, `typescript-best-practices`, `javascript-best-practices`, `python-best-practices`, `golang-best-practices`.
+- Local skill file hints if installed: `.github/skills/system-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/unit-testing/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/typescript-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/javascript-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/python-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/golang-best-practices/SKILL.md`.
+- Treat the skill bundle as already resolved for this workflow. Do not start with route discovery.
+3. Apply workflow sections in order: When to use, Workflow steps, Context notes, Verification.
+4. Route to the workflow's primary specialist and only add supporting specialists when needed.
+5. If freshness or public comparison matters, run `deep-research` before implementation and use official docs as primary evidence.
+6. Return actions taken, verification evidence, and any gaps.
+
+Workflow source:
+# Migrate Workflow
+
+## When to use
+
+Use this for technology migrations, framework upgrades, dependency updates, or major version transitions.
+
+## Routing
+
+- Primary specialist: `@code-archaeologist`
+- Implementation support: `@backend-specialist`, `@frontend-specialist`
+- Verification support: `@test-engineer`, `@validator`
+
+## Context notes
+
+- This workflow file, active platform rules, and selected agents or skills guide execution.
+- Attach the migration target, current versions, breaking change lists, and impact assessment.
+- Read `ENGINEERING_RULES.md` and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` first because migrations often change accepted patterns and current-state architecture at the same time. After migration, flag updates needed in `docs/foundation/ARCHITECTURE.md` for `## Risks And Tech Debt`.
+
+## Skill Routing
+
+- Primary skills: `legacy-modernizer`, `system-design`
+- Supporting skills (optional): `static-analysis`, `testing-patterns`, `typescript-pro`, `javascript-pro`, `python-pro`, `golang-pro`
+- Start with `legacy-modernizer` for migration methodology and `system-design` for system impact. Add `static-analysis` for automated codemod or compatibility analysis.
+
+## Workflow steps
+
+1. Assess current state and migration target.
+2. Map breaking changes and affected code paths.
+3. Plan incremental migration steps with rollback points.
+4. Execute migration one step at a time with verification.
+5. Update tests and documentation for new patterns.
+6. Set `doc_impact` when the migration changes architecture, deployment shape, boundaries, or design-system rules.
+7. Verify full system behavior after migration complete.
+
+## Verification
+
+- All breaking changes addressed.
+- Tests pass on migrated code.
+- Rollback tested at each migration step.
+- No degradation in performance or functionality.
+- Documentation updated for new patterns.
+
+## Output Contract
+
+```yaml
+MIGRATE_WORKFLOW_RESULT:
+  primary_agent: code-archaeologist
+  supporting_agents: [backend-specialist?, frontend-specialist?, test-engineer?, validator?]
+  primary_skills: [legacy-modernizer, system-design]
+  supporting_skills: [static-analysis?, testing-patterns?]
+  migration:
+    from: <string>
+    to: <string>
+    breaking_changes: [<string>]
+    steps_completed: [<string>]
+    rollback_points: [<string>]
+  verification:
+    tests_passed: true | false
+    performance_impact: <string>
+  doc_impact: none | tech | rules | both
+  follow_up_items: [<string>] | []
+```

package/workflows/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/copilot/prompts/mobile.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+# Workflow Prompt: /mobile
+
+Drive mobile implementation decisions for Flutter/cross-platform behavior and reliability.
+
+Execution contract:
+1. Treat route selection as already resolved by this command; do not begin with skill discovery.
+2. Read `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md`, `ENGINEERING_RULES.md`, `docs/foundation/ARCHITECTURE.md`, and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` in that order when they exist before non-trivial execution.
+Attached skills:
+- Load these exact skill IDs first: `expo-app`, `react-native`, `stitch`, `frontend-design`, `swift-best-practices`, `kotlin-best-practices`.
+- Local skill file hints if installed: `.github/skills/expo-app/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/react-native/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/stitch/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/frontend-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/swift-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/kotlin-best-practices/SKILL.md`.
+- Treat the skill bundle as already resolved for this workflow. Do not start with route discovery.
+3. Apply workflow sections in order: When to use, Workflow steps, Context notes, Verification.
+4. Route to the workflow's primary specialist and only add supporting specialists when needed.
+5. If freshness or public comparison matters, run `deep-research` before implementation and use official docs as primary evidence.
+6. Return actions taken, verification evidence, and any gaps.
+
+Workflow source:
+# Mobile Workflow
+
+## When to use
+
+Use this for mobile app development, Flutter architecture, Stitch-driven mobile screen handoff, native integrations, or platform-specific behavior.
+
+## Routing
+
+- Primary specialist: `@mobile-developer`
+- Design support: `@frontend-specialist`
+- Verification support: `@test-engineer`
+
+## Context notes
+
+- This workflow file, active platform rules, and selected agents or skills guide execution.
+- Attach platform targets (iOS, Android, both), Flutter version, and relevant screen/feature context.
+- Read `ENGINEERING_RULES.md` and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` before implementing non-trivial mobile work so screens and features follow the declared architecture and design-system rules. Check `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md` for `## Domain Glossary` to use consistent terminology.
+
+## Skill Routing
+
+- Primary skills: `flutter-feature`, `mobile-design`
+- Supporting skills (optional): `stitch`, `i18n-localization`, `flutter-riverpod`, `flutter-go-router`, `flutter-design-system`, `flutter-testing`, `flutter-drift`, `flutter-offline-sync`, `flutter-state-machine`, `flutter-repository`, `dart-pro`, `swift-pro`, `kotlin-pro`
+- Start with `flutter-feature` for feature implementation and `mobile-design` for UX patterns. Add framework-specific Flutter skill when applicable. Add `i18n-localization` for multi-language support.
+- When the request starts from Stitch artifacts or a design sync, load `stitch` first and then pair it with `mobile-design` plus the narrowest mobile implementation skill for the target stack.
+
+## Workflow steps
+
+1. Clarify platform targets and feature requirements.
+2. Design architecture with platform-appropriate patterns.
+3. Implement with consideration for iOS/Android differences.
+4. Write widget and integration tests.
+5. Review for platform-specific edge cases and UX conventions.
+6. Set `doc_impact` if the feature changes navigation, shared UI rules, or mobile architecture conventions.
+
+## Verification
+
+- Runs correctly on both target platforms.
+- Platform-specific conventions respected (iOS/Android).
+- Touch targets and gesture feedback appropriate.
+- Widget tests cover core behavior.
+- Offline behavior tested if applicable.
+
+## Output Contract
+
+```yaml
+MOBILE_WORKFLOW_RESULT:
+  primary_agent: mobile-developer
+  supporting_agents: [frontend-specialist?, test-engineer?]
+  primary_skills: [flutter-feature, mobile-design]
+  supporting_skills: [stitch?, i18n-localization?, flutter-riverpod?, flutter-testing?, <flutter-specific>?]
+  implementation:
+    platforms: [ios, android]
+    architecture_decisions: [<string>]
+    changed_artifacts: [<path>]
+  testing:
+    widget_tests: [<path>]
+    integration_tests: [<path>] | []
+  platform_notes:
+    ios: [<string>] | []
+    android: [<string>] | []
+  doc_impact: none | tech | rules | both
+  follow_up_items: [<string>] | []
+```

package/workflows/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/copilot/prompts/onboard.prompt.md

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# Workflow Prompt: /onboard
+
+Survey an unfamiliar codebase, map its architecture, identify patterns and conventions, and produce a structured orientation report for new contributors.
+
+Execution contract:
+1. Treat route selection as already resolved by this command; do not begin with skill discovery.
+2. Read `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md`, `ENGINEERING_RULES.md`, `docs/foundation/ARCHITECTURE.md`, and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` in that order when they exist before non-trivial execution.
+Attached skills:
+- Load these exact skill IDs first: `deep-research`, `system-design`, `database-design`, `typescript-best-practices`, `javascript-best-practices`, `python-best-practices`.
+- Local skill file hints if installed: `.github/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/system-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/database-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/typescript-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/javascript-best-practices/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/python-best-practices/SKILL.md`.
+- Treat the skill bundle as already resolved for this workflow. Do not start with route discovery.
+3. Apply workflow sections in order: When to use, Workflow steps, Context notes, Verification.
+4. Route to the workflow's primary specialist and only add supporting specialists when needed.
+5. If freshness or public comparison matters, run `deep-research` before implementation and use official docs as primary evidence.
+6. Return actions taken, verification evidence, and any gaps.
+
+Workflow source:
+# Onboard Workflow
+
+## When to use
+
+Use this when joining a new project, exploring an unfamiliar codebase, or preparing orientation material.
+
+## Routing
+
+- Primary specialist: `@researcher`
+- Architecture mapping: `@code-archaeologist`
+- Domain specialists as needed: `@backend-specialist`, `@frontend-specialist`
+
+## Context notes
+
+- This workflow file, active platform rules, and selected agents or skills guide execution.
+- Provide the repo URL, focus areas, and any specific questions to answer during onboarding.
+- Read `ENGINEERING_RULES.md` first, then `docs/foundation/TECH.md`, `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md`, and `docs/foundation/ARCHITECTURE.md` when present so onboarding distinguishes the intended contract from current implementation reality. Use the `## Domain Glossary` in PRODUCT.md to learn project-specific terms, and `## Build And Validation` in TECH.md to set up the local environment.
+
+## Skill Routing
+
+- Primary skills: `deep-research`, `system-design`
+- Supporting skills (optional): `legacy-modernizer`, `database-design`, `typescript-pro`, `javascript-pro`, `python-pro`
+- Start with `deep-research` for systematic exploration and `system-design` for architecture mapping. Add `legacy-modernizer` for undocumented systems. Prefer repo evidence first; use external sources only when setup or dependency behavior cannot be confirmed locally.
+
+## Workflow steps
+
+1. Survey the project structure — directories, entry points, and configuration.
+2. Map the architecture — components, data flow, and integration points.
+3. Identify patterns — naming conventions, design patterns, and coding standards.
+4. Document dependencies — external services, databases, and APIs.
+5. Produce orientation report with development setup instructions.
+
+## Verification
+
+- All major components identified and documented.
+- Development setup instructions verified (can be followed by a newcomer).
+- Architecture diagram or description covers main data flows.
+- Key patterns and conventions explicitly documented.
+
+## Output Contract
+
+```yaml
+ONBOARD_WORKFLOW_RESULT:
+  primary_agent: researcher
+  supporting_agents: [code-archaeologist?, backend-specialist?, frontend-specialist?]
+  primary_skills: [deep-research, system-design]
+  supporting_skills: [legacy-modernizer?, database-design?]
+  project_overview:
+    purpose: <string>
+    tech_stack: [<string>]
+    architecture: <string>
+  key_components: [<string>]
+  patterns_and_conventions: [<string>]
+  development_setup: [<step>]
+  dependencies: [<string>]
+  knowledge_gaps: [<string>] | []
+```

package/workflows/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/{antigravity/workflows/orchestrate.md → copilot/prompts/orchestrate.prompt.md}

@@ -1,9 +1,20 @@
----
-command: "/orchestrate"
-description: "Coordinate multiple specialists to solve cross-cutting tasks with explicit ownership, validation gates, and repeat-until-good iteration."
-triggers: ["orchestrate", "coordinate", "multi-area", "cross-team", "handoff"]
----
-
+# Workflow Prompt: /orchestrate
+
+Coordinate multiple specialists to solve cross-cutting tasks with explicit ownership, validation gates, and repeat-until-good iteration.
+
+Execution contract:
+1. Treat route selection as already resolved by this command; do not begin with skill discovery.
+2. Read `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md`, `ENGINEERING_RULES.md`, `docs/foundation/ARCHITECTURE.md`, and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` in that order when they exist before non-trivial execution.
+Attached skills:
+- Load these exact skill IDs first: `system-design`, `api-design`, `database-design`, `deep-research`, `mcp-server-builder`, `tech-doc`, `prompt-engineering`, `skill-creator`.
+- Local skill file hints if installed: `.github/skills/system-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/api-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/database-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/mcp-server-builder/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/tech-doc/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/prompt-engineering/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/skill-creator/SKILL.md`.
+- Treat the skill bundle as already resolved for this workflow. Do not start with route discovery.
+3. Apply workflow sections in order: When to use, Workflow steps, Context notes, Verification.
+4. Route to the workflow's primary specialist and only add supporting specialists when needed.
+5. If freshness or public comparison matters, run `deep-research` before implementation and use official docs as primary evidence.
+6. Return actions taken, verification evidence, and any gaps.
+
+Workflow source:
 # Orchestrate Workflow
 
 ## When to use
@@ -12,20 +23,20 @@ Use this when a task spans multiple domains (backend + frontend, security + infr
 
 ## Routing
 
-- Primary coordinator: `.agent/agents/orchestrator`
-- Specialist routing determined by task decomposition — delegates to `.agent/agents/backend-specialist`, `.agent/agents/frontend-specialist`, `.agent/agents/database-architect`, `.agent/agents/security-auditor`, `.agent/agents/ci-cd-pipeline`, `.agent/agents/test-engineer`, `.agent/agents/mobile-developer`, or other specialist agents as needed.
-- Validation support: `.agent/agents/validator`
+- Primary coordinator: `@orchestrator`
+- Specialist routing determined by task decomposition — delegates to `@backend-specialist`, `@frontend-specialist`, `@database-architect`, `@security-auditor`, `@devops-engineer`, `@test-engineer`, `@mobile-developer`, or other specialist agents as needed.
+- Validation support: `@validator`
 
 ## Context notes
 
 - This workflow file, active platform rules, and selected agents or skills guide execution.
 - Attach the full task description, constraints, acceptance criteria, and relevant context when starting.
-- Read `ENGINEERING_RULES.md` and `TECH.md` before decomposing non-trivial work, then reuse any existing `docs/specs/<spec-id>/` pack as the handoff source of truth.
+- Read `ENGINEERING_RULES.md` and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` before decomposing non-trivial work. Check `docs/foundation/TECH.md` for build/validation commands and `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md` for domain glossary. Then reuse any existing `docs/specs/<spec-id>/` pack as the handoff source of truth.
 
 ## Skill Routing
 
 - Primary skills: `system-design`, `api-design`
-- Supporting skills (optional): `database-design`, `deep-research`, `mcp-server-builder`, `tech-doc`, `prompt-engineering`, `skill-creator`
+- Supporting skills (optional): `database-design`, `deep-research`, `mcp-server-builder`, `openai-docs`, `prompt-engineering`, `skill-creator`
 - Start with `system-design` for system design coordination and `api-design` for integration contracts. Add `deep-research` before implementation when the coordination challenge depends on fresh external facts or public comparison.
 
 ## Workflow steps
@@ -69,5 +80,3 @@ ORCHESTRATE_WORKFLOW_RESULT:
   remaining_risks: [<string>] | []
   follow_up_actions: [<string>] | []
 ```
-
-> **Antigravity note:** Use Agent Manager for parallel agent coordination. Workflow files are stored under `.agent/workflows/`.

package/workflows/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/{antigravity/workflows/plan.md → copilot/prompts/plan.prompt.md}

@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
----
-command: "/plan"
-description: "Build a decision-complete implementation plan with interfaces, failure modes, and acceptance criteria."
-triggers:
-  [
-    "plan",
-    "design",
-    "roadmap",
-    "acceptance",
-    "brainstorm",
-    "idea",
-    "options",
-    "tradeoff",
-    "approach",
-  ]
----
-
+# Workflow Prompt: /plan
+
+Build a decision-complete implementation plan with interfaces, failure modes, and acceptance criteria.
+
+Execution contract:
+1. Treat route selection as already resolved by this command; do not begin with skill discovery.
+2. Read `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md`, `ENGINEERING_RULES.md`, `docs/foundation/ARCHITECTURE.md`, and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` in that order when they exist before non-trivial execution.
+Attached skills:
+- Load these exact skill IDs first: `system-design`, `api-design`, `database-design`, `deep-research`, `mcp-server-builder`, `tech-doc`, `prompt-engineering`, `skill-creator`.
+- Local skill file hints if installed: `.github/skills/system-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/api-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/database-design/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/deep-research/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/mcp-server-builder/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/tech-doc/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/prompt-engineering/SKILL.md`, `.github/skills/skill-creator/SKILL.md`.
+- Treat the skill bundle as already resolved for this workflow. Do not start with route discovery.
+3. Apply workflow sections in order: When to use, Workflow steps, Context notes, Verification.
+4. Route to the workflow's primary specialist and only add supporting specialists when needed.
+5. If freshness or public comparison matters, run `deep-research` before implementation and use official docs as primary evidence.
+6. Return actions taken, verification evidence, and any gaps.
+
+Workflow source:
 # Plan Workflow
 
 ## When to use
@@ -23,21 +23,21 @@ Use this when starting a new feature, project, or significant change that needs
 
 ## Routing
 
-- Primary coordinator: `.agent/agents/project-planner`
-- Architecture support: `.agent/agents/orchestrator`
-- Domain validation: `.agent/agents/backend-specialist`, `.agent/agents/frontend-specialist`, `.agent/agents/database-architect`
+- Primary coordinator: `@project-planner`
+- Architecture support: `@orchestrator`
+- Domain validation: `@backend-specialist`, `@frontend-specialist`, `@database-architect`
 
 ## Context notes
 
 - This workflow file, active platform rules, and selected agents or skills guide execution.
 - Attach the feature request, problem statement, constraints, and any existing design documents.
-- Read `ENGINEERING_RULES.md` first and `TECH.md` next when they exist before finalizing a non-trivial plan.
+- Read `ENGINEERING_RULES.md` first and `docs/foundation/TECH.md` next when they exist before finalizing a non-trivial plan. Also check `docs/foundation/PRODUCT.md` for domain glossary and `docs/foundation/ARCHITECTURE.md` for crosscutting concerns and dependency rules.
 - Reuse an existing `docs/specs/<spec-id>/` pack when the change already has one instead of creating a parallel planning track.
 
 ## Skill Routing
 
 - Primary skills: `system-design`, `api-design`
-- Supporting skills (optional): `database-design`, `deep-research`, `mcp-server-builder`, `tech-doc`, `prompt-engineering`, `skill-creator`
+- Supporting skills (optional): `database-design`, `deep-research`, `mcp-server-builder`, `openai-docs`, `prompt-engineering`, `skill-creator`
 - Start with `system-design` for system design and `api-design` for API contracts. Add `database-design` when data modeling is central, `deep-research` when fresh external knowledge or public comparison is needed.
 
 ## Workflow steps
@@ -86,5 +86,3 @@ PLAN_WORKFLOW_RESULT:
   traceability_status: complete | partial | blocked
   follow_up_items: [<string>] | []
 ```
-
-> **Antigravity note:** Use Agent Manager for parallel agent coordination. Workflow files are stored under `.agent/workflows/`.