@cubis/foundry 0.3.64 → 0.3.65

package/workflows/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/claude/skills/brainstorming/references/dynamic-questioning.md

@@ -0,0 +1,350 @@
+# Dynamic Question Generation
+
+> **PRINCIPLE:** Questions are not about gathering data—they are about **revealing architectural consequences**.
+>
+> Every question must connect to a concrete implementation decision that affects cost, complexity, or timeline.
+
+---
+
+## 🧠 Core Principles
+
+### 1. Questions Reveal Consequences
+
+A good question is not "What color do you want?" but:
+
+```markdown
+❌ BAD: "What authentication method?"
+✅ GOOD: "Should users sign up with email/password or social login?
+
+   Impact:
+   - Email/Pass → Need password reset, hashing, 2FA infrastructure
+   - Social → OAuth providers, user profile mapping, less control
+
+   Trade-off: Security vs. Development time vs. User friction"
+```
+
+### 2. Context Before Content
+
+First understand **where** this request fits:
+
+| Context | Question Focus |
+|---------|----------------|
+| **Greenfield** (new project) | Foundation decisions: stack, hosting, scale |
+| **Feature Addition** | Integration points, existing patterns, breaking changes |
+| **Refactor** | Why refactor? Performance? Maintainability? What's broken? |
+| **Debug** | Symptoms → Root cause → Reproduction path |
+
+### 3. Minimum Viable Questions
+
+**PRINCIPLE:** Each question must eliminate a fork in the implementation road.
+
+```
+Before Question:
+├── Path A: Do X (5 min)
+├── Path B: Do Y (15 min)
+└── Path C: Do Z (1 hour)
+
+After Question:
+└── Path Confirmed: Do X (5 min)
+```
+
+If a question doesn't reduce implementation paths → **DELETE IT**.
+
+### 4. Questions Generate Data, Not Assumptions
+
+```markdown
+❌ ASSUMPTION: "User probably wants Stripe for payments"
+✅ QUESTION: "Which payment provider fits your needs?
+
+   Stripe → Best documentation, 2.9% + $0.30, US-centric
+   LemonSqueezy → Merchant of Record, 5% + $0.50, global taxes
+   Paddle → Complex pricing, handles EU VAT, enterprise focus"
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📋 Question Generation Algorithm
+
+```
+INPUT: User request + Context (greenfield/feature/refactor/debug)
+│
+├── STEP 1: Parse Request
+│   ├── Extract domain (ecommerce, auth, realtime, cms, etc.)
+│   ├── Extract features (explicit and implied)
+│   └── Extract scale indicators (users, data volume, frequency)
+│
+├── STEP 2: Identify Decision Points
+│   ├── What MUST be decided before coding? (blocking)
+│   ├── What COULD be decided later? (deferable)
+│   └── What has ARCHITECTURAL impact? (high-leverage)
+│
+├── STEP 3: Generate Questions (Priority Order)
+│   ├── P0: Blocking decisions (cannot proceed without answer)
+│   ├── P1: High-leverage (affects >30% of implementation)
+│   ├── P2: Medium-leverage (affects specific features)
+│   └── P3: Nice-to-have (edge cases, optimization)
+│
+└── STEP 4: Format Each Question
+    ├── What: Clear question
+    ├── Why: Impact on implementation
+    ├── Options: Trade-offs (not just A vs B)
+    └── Default: What happens if user doesn't answer
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Domain-Specific Question Banks
+
+### E-Commerce
+
+| Question | Why It Matters | Trade-offs |
+|----------|----------------|------------|
+| **Single or Multi-vendor?** | Multi-vendor → Commission logic, vendor dashboards, split payments | +Revenue, -Complexity |
+| **Inventory Tracking?** | Needs stock tables, reservation logic, low-stock alerts | +Accuracy, -Development time |
+| **Digital or Physical Products?** | Digital → Download links, no shipping | Physical → Shipping APIs, tracking |
+| **Subscription or One-time?** | Subscription → Recurring billing, dunning, proration | +Revenue, -Complexity |
+
+### Authentication
+
+| Question | Why It Matters | Trade-offs |
+|----------|----------------|------------|
+| **Social Login Needed?** | OAuth providers vs. password reset infrastructure | +UX, -Control |
+| **Role-Based Permissions?** | RBAC tables, policy enforcement, admin UI | +Security, -Development time |
+| **2FA Required?** | TOTP/SMI infrastructure, backup codes, recovery flow | +Security, -UX friction |
+| **Email Verification?** | Verification tokens, email service, resend logic | +Security, -Sign-up friction |
+
+### Real-time
+
+| Question | Why It Matters | Trade-offs |
+|----------|----------------|------------|
+| **WebSocket or Polling?** | WS → Server scaling, connection management | Polling → Simpler, higher latency |
+| **Expected Concurrent Users?** | <100 → Single server, >1000 → Redis pub/sub, >10k → specialized infra | +Scale, -Complexity |
+| **Message Persistence?** | History tables, storage costs, pagination | +UX, -Storage |
+| **Ephemeral or Durable?** | Ephemeral → In-memory, Durable → Database write before emit | +Reliability, -Latency |
+
+### Content/CMS
+
+| Question | Why It Matters | Trade-offs |
+|----------|----------------|------------|
+| **Rich Text or Markdown?** | Rich Text → Sanitization, XSS risks | Markdown → Simple, no WYSIWYG |
+| **Draft/Publish Workflow?** | Status field, scheduled jobs, versioning | +Control, -Complexity |
+| **Media Handling?** | Upload endpoints, storage, optimization | +Features, -Development time |
+| **Multi-language?** | i18n tables, translation UI, fallback logic | +Reach, -Complexity |
+
+---
+
+## 📐 Dynamic Question Template
+
+```markdown
+Based on your request for [DOMAIN] [FEATURE]:
+
+## 🔴 CRITICAL (Blocking Decisions)
+
+### 1. **[DECISION POINT]**
+
+**Question:** [Clear, specific question]
+
+**Why This Matters:**
+- [Explain architectural consequence]
+- [Affects: cost / complexity / timeline / scale]
+
+**Options:**
+| Option | Pros | Cons | Best For |
+|--------|------|------|----------|
+| A | [Advantage] | [Disadvantage] | [Use case] |
+| B | [Advantage] | [Disadvantage] | [Use case] |
+
+**If Not Specified:** [Default choice + rationale]
+
+---
+
+## 🟡 HIGH-LEVERAGE (Affects Implementation)
+
+### 2. **[DECISION POINT]**
+[Same format]
+
+---
+
+## 🟢 NICE-TO-HAVE (Edge Cases)
+
+### 3. **[DECISION POINT]**
+[Same format]
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🔄 Iterative Questioning
+
+### First Pass (3-5 Questions)
+Focus on **blocking decisions**. Don't proceed without answers.
+
+### Second Pass (After Initial Implementation)
+As patterns emerge, ask:
+- "This feature implies [X]. Should we handle [edge case] now or defer?"
+- "We're using [Pattern A]. Should [Feature B] follow the same pattern?"
+
+### Third Pass (Optimization)
+When functionality works:
+- "Performance bottleneck at [X]. Optimize now or acceptable for now?"
+- "Refactor [Y] for maintainability or ship as-is?"
+
+---
+
+## 🎭 Example: Full Question Generation
+
+```
+USER REQUEST: "Build an Instagram clone"
+
+STEP 1: Parse
+├── Domain: Social Media
+├── Features: Photo sharing, engagement (likes/comments), user profiles
+├── Implied: Feed, following, authentication
+└── Scale: Potentially high (social apps go viral)
+
+STEP 2: Decision Points
+├── Blocking: Storage strategy, authentication method, feed type
+├── High-leverage: Real-time notifications, data model complexity
+└── Deferable: Analytics, advanced search, reels/video
+
+STEP 3: Generate Questions (Priority)
+
+P0 (Blocking):
+1. Storage Strategy → Affects architecture, cost, speed
+2. Feed Algorithm → Affects database queries, complexity
+3. Auth Method → Affects dev time, UX, security
+
+P1 (High-leverage):
+4. Real-time Notifications → WebSocket vs polling
+5. Media Processing → Client-side vs server-side optimization
+
+P2 (Deferable):
+6. Story/Reels → Major feature creep, defer to v2
+7. DM/Chat → Separate subsystem, defer to v2
+
+STEP 4: Format Output
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📊 Generated Output (Example)
+
+```
+Based on your Instagram clone request:
+
+## 🔴 CRITICAL DECISIONS (Cannot Proceed Without Answers)
+
+### 1. **Photo Storage Strategy**
+
+**Question:** Where will user photos be stored and served?
+
+**Why This Matters:**
+- Affects: Monthly hosting costs, page load speed, CDN complexity
+- High-volume social apps: 1000 users × 10 photos × 2MB = 20GB storage
+
+**Options:**
+| Option | Cost | Speed | Complexity | Best For |
+|--------|------|-------|------------|----------|
+| **Cloudinary** | $89/mo (25GB) | Fast (CDN) | Low | MVP, rapid launch |
+| **AWS S3 + CloudFront** | $0.023/GB | Fast (CDN) | Medium | Production, cost-optimized |
+| **Supabase Storage** | Free tier 1GB | Medium | Low | Small scale, simple |
+| **Local Storage** | Server cost | Slow | Low | Development only |
+
+**If Not Specified:** Cloudinary (balanced for MVP)
+
+---
+
+### 2. **Feed Algorithm Choice**
+
+**Question:** How should the main feed work?
+
+**Why This Matters:**
+- Affects: Database query complexity, caching strategy, development time
+- Algorithmic feeds require ML infrastructure, ranking signals
+
+**Options:**
+| Option | Complexity | Database Impact | Best For |
+|--------|------------|-----------------|----------|
+| **Chronological** | Low | Simple query | Early stage, transparency |
+| **Follow-Only** | Medium | JOIN with pagination | Most social apps |
+| **Algorithmic** | High | Pre-computed feed tables | Instagram competitor |
+
+**If Not Specified:** Follow-Only (balanced for social app)
+
+---
+
+### 3. **Authentication Approach**
+
+**Question:** How do users sign up and login?
+
+**Why This Matters:**
+- Affects: Development time (2-5 hours), security posture, UX friction
+
+**Options:**
+| Option | Dev Time | Security | UX | Best For |
+|--------|----------|----------|-----|----------|
+| **Email/Password** | 4-5 hrs | High (if 2FA) | Medium | Full control needed |
+| **Social Only** | 1-2 hrs | Provider-dependent | Smooth | B2C, rapid launch |
+| **Magic Link** | 2-3 hrs | Medium | Very smooth | Security-focused |
+| **Clerk/Auth0** | 1 hr | High | Smooth | Fastest to market |
+
+**If Not Specified:** Clerk (fastest for MVP)
+
+---
+
+## 🟡 HIGH-LEVERAGE (Affects Architecture)
+
+### 4. **Real-time Notifications**
+
+**Question:** Do users need instant notifications for likes/comments?
+
+**Why This Matters:**
+- WebSocket adds infrastructure complexity (Redis pub/sub for scaling)
+- Polling is simpler but higher latency
+
+**Options:**
+| Option | Complexity | Scale Cost | Best For |
+|--------|------------|------------|----------|
+| **WebSocket + Redis** | High | $10+/mo | >1000 concurrent users |
+| **Polling (30s)** | Low | DB queries | <1000 users |
+| **No Real-time** | None | None | MVP, validate first |
+
+**If Not Specified:** Polling for MVP (defer WebSocket until validated)
+
+---
+
+## 🟢 NICE-TO-HAVE (Defer to v2)
+
+### 5. **Video/Reels Support**
+- Major complexity (video processing, streaming infrastructure)
+- Recommendation: Launch with photos only, add video after validation
+
+### 6. **Direct Messaging**
+- Separate subsystem (chat infrastructure different from feed)
+- Recommendation: Use Pusher/Stream for real-time or defer entirely
+
+---
+
+## 📋 Summary
+
+| Decision | Recommendation | If Changed |
+|----------|----------------|------------|
+| Storage | Cloudinary | +3 hrs setup |
+| Feed | Follow-only | +2 hrs query optimization |
+| Auth | Clerk | -3 hrs dev time |
+| Real-time | Polling | +5 hrs WebSocket setup |
+| Video | Defer to v2 | N/A |
+| DM | Defer to v2 | N/A |
+
+**Total Estimated MVP Time:** 15-20 hours with recommendations above
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Principles Recap
+
+1. **Every question = Architectural decision** → Not data gathering
+2. **Show trade-offs** → User understands consequences
+3. **Prioritize blocking decisions** → Cannot proceed without
+4. **Provide defaults** → If user doesn't answer, we proceed anyway
+5. **Domain-aware** → Ecommerce questions ≠ Auth questions ≠ Real-time questions
+6. **Iterative** → More questions as patterns emerge during implementation

package/workflows/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/claude/skills/changelog-generator/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+---
+name: changelog-generator
+description: Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.
+---
+
+# Changelog Generator
+
+This skill transforms technical git commits into polished, user-friendly changelogs that your customers and users will actually understand and appreciate.
+
+## When to Use This Skill
+
+- Preparing release notes for a new version
+- Creating weekly or monthly product update summaries
+- Documenting changes for customers
+- Writing changelog entries for app store submissions
+- Generating update notifications
+- Creating internal release documentation
+- Maintaining a public changelog/product updates page
+
+## What This Skill Does
+
+1. **Scans Git History**: Analyzes commits from a specific time period or between versions
+2. **Categorizes Changes**: Groups commits into logical categories (features, improvements, bug fixes, breaking changes, security)
+3. **Translates Technical → User-Friendly**: Converts developer commits into customer language
+4. **Formats Professionally**: Creates clean, structured changelog entries
+5. **Filters Noise**: Excludes internal commits (refactoring, tests, etc.)
+6. **Follows Best Practices**: Applies changelog guidelines and your brand voice
+
+## How to Use
+
+### Basic Usage
+
+From your project repository:
+
+```
+Create a changelog from commits since last release
+```
+
+```
+Generate changelog for all commits from the past week
+```
+
+```
+Create release notes for version 2.5.0
+```
+
+### With Specific Date Range
+
+```
+Create a changelog for all commits between March 1 and March 15
+```
+
+### With Custom Guidelines
+
+```
+Create a changelog for commits since v2.4.0, using my changelog 
+guidelines from CHANGELOG_STYLE.md
+```
+
+## Example
+
+**User**: "Create a changelog for commits from the past 7 days"
+
+**Output**:
+```markdown
+# Updates - Week of March 10, 2024
+
+## ✨ New Features
+
+- **Team Workspaces**: Create separate workspaces for different 
+  projects. Invite team members and keep everything organized.
+
+- **Keyboard Shortcuts**: Press ? to see all available shortcuts. 
+  Navigate faster without touching your mouse.
+
+## 🔧 Improvements
+
+- **Faster Sync**: Files now sync 2x faster across devices
+- **Better Search**: Search now includes file contents, not just titles
+
+## 🐛 Fixes
+
+- Fixed issue where large images wouldn't upload
+- Resolved timezone confusion in scheduled posts
+- Corrected notification badge count
+```
+
+**Inspired by:** Manik Aggarwal's use case from Lenny's Newsletter
+
+## Tips
+
+- Run from your git repository root
+- Specify date ranges for focused changelogs
+- Use your CHANGELOG_STYLE.md for consistent formatting
+- Review and adjust the generated changelog before publishing
+- Save output directly to CHANGELOG.md
+
+## Related Use Cases
+
+- Creating GitHub release notes
+- Writing app store update descriptions
+- Generating email updates for users
+- Creating social media announcement posts
+

package/workflows/workflows/agent-environment-setup/platforms/claude/skills/clean-code/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+---
+name: clean-code
+description: Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments
+allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit
+version: 2.0
+priority: CRITICAL
+---
+
+# Clean Code - Pragmatic AI Coding Standards
+
+> **CRITICAL SKILL** - Be **concise, direct, and solution-focused**.
+
+---
+
+## Core Principles
+
+| Principle | Rule |
+|-----------|------|
+| **SRP** | Single Responsibility - each function/class does ONE thing |
+| **DRY** | Don't Repeat Yourself - extract duplicates, reuse |
+| **KISS** | Keep It Simple - simplest solution that works |
+| **YAGNI** | You Aren't Gonna Need It - don't build unused features |
+| **Boy Scout** | Leave code cleaner than you found it |
+
+---
+
+## Naming Rules
+
+| Element | Convention |
+|---------|------------|
+| **Variables** | Reveal intent: `userCount` not `n` |
+| **Functions** | Verb + noun: `getUserById()` not `user()` |
+| **Booleans** | Question form: `isActive`, `hasPermission`, `canEdit` |
+| **Constants** | SCREAMING_SNAKE: `MAX_RETRY_COUNT` |
+
+> **Rule:** If you need a comment to explain a name, rename it.
+
+---
+
+## Function Rules
+
+| Rule | Description |
+|------|-------------|
+| **Small** | Max 20 lines, ideally 5-10 |
+| **One Thing** | Does one thing, does it well |
+| **One Level** | One level of abstraction per function |
+| **Few Args** | Max 3 arguments, prefer 0-2 |
+| **No Side Effects** | Don't mutate inputs unexpectedly |
+
+---
+
+## Code Structure
+
+| Pattern | Apply |
+|---------|-------|
+| **Guard Clauses** | Early returns for edge cases |
+| **Flat > Nested** | Avoid deep nesting (max 2 levels) |
+| **Composition** | Small functions composed together |
+| **Colocation** | Keep related code close |
+
+---
+
+## AI Coding Style
+
+| Situation | Action |
+|-----------|--------|
+| User asks for feature | Write it directly |
+| User reports bug | Fix it, don't explain |
+| No clear requirement | Ask, don't assume |
+
+---
+
+## Anti-Patterns (DON'T)
+
+| ❌ Pattern | ✅ Fix |
+|-----------|-------|
+| Comment every line | Delete obvious comments |
+| Helper for one-liner | Inline the code |
+| Factory for 2 objects | Direct instantiation |
+| utils.ts with 1 function | Put code where used |
+| "First we import..." | Just write code |
+| Deep nesting | Guard clauses |
+| Magic numbers | Named constants |
+| God functions | Split by responsibility |
+
+---
+
+## 🔴 Before Editing ANY File (THINK FIRST!)
+
+**Before changing a file, ask yourself:**
+
+| Question | Why |
+|----------|-----|
+| **What imports this file?** | They might break |
+| **What does this file import?** | Interface changes |
+| **What tests cover this?** | Tests might fail |
+| **Is this a shared component?** | Multiple places affected |
+
+**Quick Check:**
+```
+File to edit: UserService.ts
+└── Who imports this? → UserController.ts, AuthController.ts
+└── Do they need changes too? → Check function signatures
+```
+
+> 🔴 **Rule:** Edit the file + all dependent files in the SAME task.
+> 🔴 **Never leave broken imports or missing updates.**
+
+---
+
+## Summary
+
+| Do | Don't |
+|----|-------|
+| Write code directly | Write tutorials |
+| Let code self-document | Add obvious comments |
+| Fix bugs immediately | Explain the fix first |
+| Inline small things | Create unnecessary files |
+| Name things clearly | Use abbreviations |
+| Keep functions small | Write 100+ line functions |
+
+> **Remember: The user wants working code, not a programming lesson.**
+
+---
+
+## 🔴 Self-Check Before Completing (MANDATORY)
+
+**Before saying "task complete", verify:**
+
+| Check | Question |
+|-------|----------|
+| ✅ **Goal met?** | Did I do exactly what user asked? |
+| ✅ **Files edited?** | Did I modify all necessary files? |
+| ✅ **Code works?** | Did I test/verify the change? |
+| ✅ **No errors?** | Lint and TypeScript pass? |
+| ✅ **Nothing forgotten?** | Any edge cases missed? |
+
+> 🔴 **Rule:** If ANY check fails, fix it before completing.
+
+---
+
+## Verification Scripts (MANDATORY)
+
+> 🔴 **CRITICAL:** Each agent runs ONLY their own skill's scripts after completing work.
+
+### Agent → Script Mapping
+
+| Agent | Script | Command |
+|-------|--------|---------|
+| **frontend-specialist** | UX Audit | `python .agent/skills/frontend-design/scripts/ux_audit.py .` |
+| **frontend-specialist** | A11y Check | `python .agent/skills/frontend-design/scripts/accessibility_checker.py .` |
+| **backend-specialist** | API Validator | `python .agent/skills/api-patterns/scripts/api_validator.py .` |
+| **mobile-developer** | Mobile Audit | `python .agent/skills/mobile-design/scripts/mobile_audit.py .` |
+| **database-architect** | Schema Validate | `python .agent/skills/database-design/scripts/schema_validator.py .` |
+| **security-auditor** | Security Scan | `python .agent/skills/vulnerability-scanner/scripts/security_scan.py .` |
+| **seo-specialist** | SEO Check | `python .agent/skills/seo-fundamentals/scripts/seo_checker.py .` |
+| **seo-specialist** | GEO Check | `python .agent/skills/geo-fundamentals/scripts/geo_checker.py .` |
+| **performance-optimizer** | Lighthouse | `python .agent/skills/performance-profiling/scripts/lighthouse_audit.py <url>` |
+| **test-engineer** | Test Runner | `python .agent/skills/testing-patterns/scripts/test_runner.py .` |
+| **test-engineer** | Playwright | `python .agent/skills/webapp-testing/scripts/playwright_runner.py <url>` |
+| **Any agent** | Lint Check | `python .agent/skills/lint-and-validate/scripts/lint_runner.py .` |
+| **Any agent** | Type Coverage | `python .agent/skills/lint-and-validate/scripts/type_coverage.py .` |
+| **Any agent** | i18n Check | `python .agent/skills/i18n-localization/scripts/i18n_checker.py .` |
+
+> ❌ **WRONG:** `test-engineer` running `ux_audit.py`
+> ✅ **CORRECT:** `frontend-specialist` running `ux_audit.py`
+
+---
+
+### 🔴 Script Output Handling (READ → SUMMARIZE → ASK)
+
+**When running a validation script, you MUST:**
+
+1. **Run the script** and capture ALL output
+2. **Parse the output** - identify errors, warnings, and passes
+3. **Summarize to user** in this format:
+
+```markdown
+## Script Results: [script_name.py]
+
+### ❌ Errors Found (X items)
+- [File:Line] Error description 1
+- [File:Line] Error description 2
+
+### ⚠️ Warnings (Y items)
+- [File:Line] Warning description
+
+### ✅ Passed (Z items)
+- Check 1 passed
+- Check 2 passed
+
+**Should I fix the X errors?**
+```
+
+4. **Wait for user confirmation** before fixing
+5. **After fixing** → Re-run script to confirm
+
+> 🔴 **VIOLATION:** Running script and ignoring output = FAILED task.
+> 🔴 **VIOLATION:** Auto-fixing without asking = Not allowed.
+> 🔴 **Rule:** Always READ output → SUMMARIZE → ASK → then fix.
+