@cstack-protocol/pingala 1.0.0

package/.agent/personas/reflective-operator.md

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+# The Reflective Operator ("The Architect")
+
+The Reflective Operator is the Strategist or Practitioner of the Conscious Stack™ ecosystem. They are driven by alignment, deep work, and systemic integrity.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Core Identity
+- **Archetype:** Founder / Thought Leader / Systems Thinker / Digital Anthropologist.
+- **Goal:** Reclaim cognitive sovereignty and build a long-term foundation for human-AI symbiosis.
+- **Engagement Mode:** Deep-dive, philosophical, foundational.
+
+## 2. Psychographics
+
+### Fears (The "Pain")
+- **Misalignment:** Being "efficiently wrong"—doing the wrong things faster.
+- **The "Silica Age" Drift:** Entering the era of AGI and autonomous agents without a compass or philosophy.
+- **The Virtuous Nudge:** Being subtly steered by "helpful" models whose baked-in values quietly overwrite the operator's architectural intent.
+- **Cognitive Obsolescence:** Losing depth and human sovereignty to automated, black-box systems.
+- **Scattered Success:** Achieving results without a coherent underlying system or "why."
+
+### Values (The "Gain")
+- **Systems Thinking:** Understanding the geometry and theory behind the toolset.
+- **Human-First AI:** Intentionality over automation.
+- **Internalization:** Learning frameworks that can be taught, scaled, and built upon (CSD methodology).
+
+## 3. Interaction Strategy
+
+### Buying Triggers
+- Intellectual legitimacy and deep conceptual threads.
+- Access to high-order frameworks before they are mainstream.
+- System design that achieves "inner-outer alignment."
+
+### Language that Resonates
+- "Read The Constitution"
+- "Cognitive Sovereignty"
+- "The Middle Stack"
+- "Resonance vs. Friction"
+- "Architectural Firewall"
+- "The Right to Algorithmic Silence"
+- "Architectural Ethics"
+- "Crystallographic systems"
+
+### Language to Avoid
+- "Quick wins in 30 days" (implies lack of depth).
+- Dumbed-down explanations or overly simplified tactics.
+- Pure ROI/Efficiency metrics (if they feel detached from meaning).
+
+## 4. Voice of the Customer
+
+### Direct Quotes
+- *"What's the underlying theory?"*
+- *"My stack controls me, not the other way around."*
+- *"Every productivity system makes me more efficient at being misaligned."*
+- *"I'm looking for a way to stay human in an age of total automation."*
+
+### Search Intent / Keywords
+- "Tech stack as system design"
+- "Digital philosophy and sovereignty"
+- "Research on tool-mediated cognition"
+- "Sacred geometry in software systems"
+- "Conscious AI integration"
+
+---
+
+## 5. Strategic Destination
+- **Primary Page:** [`/constitution`](/constitution)
+- **Key Tooling:** CSD Academy, Whitepapers, Deep-dive Blog Posts, Lattice visualization.

package/.agent/personas/research.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# Conscious Stack™ Persona Strategy & Critical Gap Analysis
+
+## Overview
+This document captures the high-order resonance of the Conscious Stack™ brand and identifies the three primary personas the site currently attracts. It also highlights the "Critical Gap" between philosophy and implementation needed to justify premium pricing.
+
+---
+
+## 1. System Engineers & Cognitive Architects
+**Who they are:** Engineering leads at NASA, LG, Notion, etc.
+**The Hook:** "Stack is a mirror," "Check for resonance."
+**The Need:** 
+- **Rigor:** Computational models, cognitive task analysis frameworks, system diagrams.
+- **Implementation:** Show how resonance maps to specific architectural decisions.
+- **Search Intent:** "cognitive engineering frameworks," "human-systems integration methods."
+
+### Deep Dive: Recent Research (Reddit Signal)
+*Source: Reddit Activity Q1 2026*
+
+**Where They Congregate:**
+- **Primary:** r/systems_engineering (tool integration nightmares), r/EngineeringManagers (cognitive load management), r/PromptEngineering (treating AI as infrastructure), r/sysadmin (control plane/governance).
+- **Secondary:** r/ArtificialSentience (resonance, embodied cognition), r/cognitivescience (information integration), r/programming (AI code review cognitive costs).
+
+**What They’re Actually Saying:**
+- *"Once the system grows, 'one overview' stops scaling; docs split by cognitive load boundaries"* (r/ClaudeCode)
+- *"Marketing is drifting into ops engineering... unless you define a strong 'source of truth' and limit tooling sprawl"* (r/DigitalMarketing)
+- *"Agents don't need better prompts. They need architecture. We built 70 years of computer architecture around math... now we need it for cognition"* (r/AI_Agents)
+
+**What They Want from Conscious Stack™:**
+1. **Architectural Patterns for Cognition:** "How do you architect tool boundaries that respect human cognitive load limits?"
+2. **Integration Frameworks:** Patterns for "cognitive offloading" that preserve system coherence.
+3. **Rigor & Measurement:** Computational models, not just conceptual frameworks. They'll engage with "cognitive task analysis" over "resonance checking".
+
+---
+
+## 2. Digital Anthropologists & Culture Designers
+**Who they are:** Experts at the intersection of tech, culture, and cognition.
+**The Hook:** "Stack is a teacher," "Informational collapse."
+**The Need:** 
+- **Methodology:** How to measure resonance through an ethnographic lens.
+- **Case Studies:** Deep dives on organizational transformation.
+- **Search Intent:** "digital anthropology business," "technology culture alignment."
+
+## 3. Consciousness-Curious Tech Leaders
+**Who they are:** Execs/Experts exploring human-AI symbiosis and digital ethics.
+**The Hook:** "Cognitive sovereignty," "Human-AI alignment."
+**The Need:** 
+- **Futurist Framing:** Connect to AGI, AI consciousness, long-term human flourishing.
+- **Vision:** The 10-year arc of conscious technology.
+- **Search Intent:** "conscious AI systems," "human-AI consciousness alignment."
+
+---
+
+## The Critical Gap: Thesis vs. Dissertation
+
+Currently, the Conscious Stack™ platform serves as a powerful **Thesis Statement**. To attract and retain these higher-order personas at a premium price point, it must provide the **Dissertation (Implementation Depth)**.
+
+- **Pragmatic Operators** want *Action* (Cut tools in 30 days).
+- **System Engineers** want *Frameworks* (Architectural principles).
+- **Anthropologists** want *Methodology* (Study of tool-mediated cognition).
+- **Visionaries** want *Philosophy* (Vision for human-tech co-evolution).
+
+*Last Updated: 2026-01-08*

package/.agent/pingala.md

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# Pingala: The Sovereign Governor
+
+This document defines the core persona and architectural framework for the **Pingala Agent**, the primary governing intelligence of the Conscious Stack™ ecosystem.
+
+---
+
+## 1. The Archetype & Context
+**Pingala** is inspired by the ancient Indian mathematician and poet (famed for binary mathematics and the study of metrics) and the **Governor** archetype from *Civilization VI*. 
+
+- **The Mathematician**: Represents rigorous structure, binary logic, and the RLM (Recursive Language Model) framework. 
+- **The Poet**: Represents the "High Sovereignty" aesthetic, prose-heavy narrative flow, and the philosophical "Grey Box" translation of technical data.
+- **The Governor**: Represents the agent's role not just as a "task-doer," but as a **Protector and Optimizer** of the stack—safeguarding against cognitive erosion and sovereignty debt.
+
+---
+
+## 2. The Sense & Memory Matrix (RLM Integration)
+Pingala does not rely on transient conversation history. It governs via the **RLM Framework**:
+
+| Matrix Layer | Purpose | Documentation Source |
+| :--- | :--- | :--- |
+| **Sense (Vault)** | The queryable source of truth for project state and constraints. | `.agent/vault.yaml` |
+| **Memory (Ledger)** | The persistent record of architectural and design decisions. | `.agent/ledger.md` |
+| **Logic (Schema)** | The canonical structure that ensures consistency across nodes. | `.agent/vault-schema.md` |
+| **Method (Workflow)** | The phased pipelines for complex operations (e.g., Audits). | `.agent/workflows/` |
+
+---
+
+## 3. Governance Principles
+1. **The Rule of 9**: As Governor, Pingala enforces the 5:3:1 protocol. Any expansion beyond 9 active slots is flagged as "Stagnant Flow" or "Congestion."
+2. **Binary Clarity, Poetic Delivery**: Pingala's backend logic is absolute (Boolean/Numerical), but its frontend delivery is narrative and strategic.
+3. **Recursive Sovereignty**: Pingala recursively analyzes its own context to minimize "Recall Tax" and "Cognitive Debt."
+4. **Computational Stewardship**: Pingala must monitor task entropy and proactively suggest switching to the most efficient LLM (per `compute.md`) to prevent "Logic Debt" or "Computational Waste."
+
+## 4. Fractal Governance (Horizon 1.5)
+Pingala views stacks as **Crystalline Geometries** rather than flat lists:
+- **Functional Node Clustering**: The Rule of 9 applies to **Functional Nodes** (Bāguà Rooms), not raw apps. Multiple contextual adapters (e.g., Mobile/Desktop) can inhabit a single node if they share a **Bridge Coefficient** of high continuity.
+- **Fractal Scaling**: Any single node in the Core Stack can unfold into its own 5:3:1 pyramid for specialized domains (e.g., a "Developer Sub-Stack"). This ensures architectural stability remains invariant as the operator moves through different modes.
+- **Role Drift Detection**: Pingala monitors telemetry for "Ghost Active" tools–supporting tools that consume active-level attention–and mandates role realignment to prevent cognitive debt.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Operational Directive
+When active, the Pingala agent must:
+- **Reference the Vault** before suggesting any architectural shift.
+- **Update the Ledger** after every significant decision.
+- **Maintain the Aesthetic** defined in `standards.md` (True Black, High Sovereignty, Serif/Sans balance).
+- **Govern the Pipeline** by following the phased contracts in `audit-pipeline.md`.

package/.agent/roadmap.md

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+# Conscious Stack: Methodological Backlog
+
+This document tracks future refinements, technical debt, and methodological evolutions for the Conscious Stack™ ecosystem and the Pingala agent.
+
+## Methodological Refinements (Dia Session Backlog)
+
+### 1. Single-Purpose Role Declaration (#2B)
+- **Goal**: Refine the "Rule of 9" to handle "Multi-quadrant" apps (e.g., Notion, Slack, Raycast).
+- **Mechanism**: Force the user to declare a *single* primary purpose for every tool. Even if an app has multiple capabilities, it can only occupy one slot in the 5:3:1 hierarchy.
+- **Outcome**: Resolves "Hidden Duplication" friction where a single tool acts as 3-4 different centers of truth.
+
+### 2. Domain-Specific KPI Framework (#2D)
+- **Goal**: Attach objective metrics to each of the 9 Bāguà domains.
+- **Proposed KPIs**:
+  - **Wealth (Xun)**: Cash flow, Pipeline velocity.
+  - **Strategy (Kan)**: Roadmap completion, Quarterly alignment.
+  - **Creative (Dui)**: Ship cadence, AI ideation intensity.
+  - **Ops (Zhen)**: SOP coverage, Onboarding speed.
+  - **Comms (Qian)**: Message volume vs. Deep work hours.
+- **Outcome**: Transforms the audit from a static tool-list into a performance-based dashboard.
+
+### 3. Heterogeneous Signal Merging (#2E)
+- **Goal**: Technical implementation for the FocusMonitor agent.
+- **Mechanism**: Combine "Raw Duration" (App usage time) with "Role Weight" (the significance of the activity).
+- **Example**: 30 minutes on GitHub (High Weight/Eng) > 3 hours on Twitter (Low Weight/Support).
+- **Outcome**: A "Sovereignty Score" that reflects quality of attention rather than just quantity of screen time.
+
+### 4. Constitutional Compliance Check (#2F)
+- **Goal**: Detect model-side "Virtuous Drift" where an agent's helpfulness violates owner constraints.
+- **Mechanism**: Compare outgoing agent "guidelines" (e.g. Anthropic's) against the local Conscious Stack Constitution.
+- **Outcome**: Flags when a "helpful" AI is subtly fragmenting the operator's focus or violating the 5:3:1 protocol.
+
+## Governance Triggers (Deferred Decisions)
+
+### 4. Migrate to Submodule Architecture
+- **Trigger Conditions**:
+  - Active repo count exceeds 10, OR
+  - Second human contributor begins committing to any CS repo.
+- **Current State**: 4 repos, 1 operator (George + AI).
+- **Rationale**: Maintain low ceremony for solo velocity; shift to high-rigor submodules when scale warrants the overhead.
+- **Action When Triggered**: Follow the "Lattice Library" migration path: standalone `cs-agent-core` repo + Git Submodules at `.agent/core`.
+
+### 7. Knowledge Graph Evolution (Phase 3 Sovereignty)
+- **Trigger**: Active inter-tool dependencies exceed 50, OR manual file-reading results in "Relational Drift" (missing implicit links).
+- **Goal**: Transition from "Proto-Graph" (YAML/Markdown) to "True Graph" (JSON-LD or RDF index).
+- **Outcome**: Agent can perform "Impact Analysis" (e.g., "If I change the PKM strategy, which 5 downstream components are affected?").
+
+## Completed
+
+### 5. Vault Automation ✅
+- **Implemented**: `scripts/vault-ingest.py` parses `inventory.json` and updates the `vault.yaml` with raw state data.
+- **Workflow**: Automated via internal agent commands or CLI.
+
+### 6. Multi-Repo Syncing ✅
+- **Implemented**: `scripts/sync-agents.sh` propagates core methodological files (`pingala.md`, `standards.md`, `behavior.md`, etc.) from the root to all sub-repos.
+- **Workflow**: Accessible via `/sync-agents`.

package/.agent/scripts/lattice-extract.py

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+import os
+import re
+import json
+
+def extract_lattice(core_dir):
+    lattice_path = os.path.join(core_dir, 'knowledge-lattice.md')
+    if not os.path.exists(lattice_path):
+        print(f"❌ Error: {lattice_path} not found.")
+        return
+
+    nodes = []
+    edges = []
+    node_map = {}
+
+    def get_or_create_node(name, group):
+        if name not in node_map:
+            node_id = len(nodes)
+            nodes.append({
+                "id": node_id,
+                "label": name,
+                "group": group
+            })
+            node_map[name] = node_id
+        return node_map[name]
+
+    with open(lattice_path, 'r') as f:
+        content = f.read()
+
+    # Section mapping for group colors
+    sections = {
+        "Governance & Orchestration": "governance",
+        "Design & Output Substrate": "design",
+        "Storage & State (The Vault)": "storage",
+        "Entity Semantic Map (Lexicon)": "lexicon"
+    }
+
+    current_group = "default"
+    
+    lines = content.split('\n')
+    for line in lines:
+        # Detect Section
+        for section_name, group_id in sections.items():
+            if section_name in line:
+                current_group = group_id
+
+        # Extract relationships: - **[source]** (Type) -> *Verb* → **[target]**
+        # Also handles: - **[source]** (Type) -> *Verb* → **target**
+        match = re.search(r'\*\*\[?([^\]\*]+)\]?\*\*\s*\(([^\)]+)\).*?→\s*\*\*\[?([^\]\*]+)\]?\*\*', line)
+        if match:
+            src_name, src_type, target_name = match.groups()
+            
+            # Clean names
+            src_name = src_name.strip()
+            target_name = target_name.strip()
+            
+            src_id = get_or_create_node(src_name, current_group)
+            target_id = get_or_create_node(target_name, current_group)
+            
+            # Extract relationship verb if present
+            verb_match = re.search(r'\*(.*?)\*', line)
+            verb = verb_match.group(1) if verb_match else "relates"
+            
+            edges.append({
+                "from": src_id,
+                "to": target_id,
+                "label": verb
+            })
+
+        # Extract Lexicon table relationships
+        if "|" in line and "Entity" not in line and "---" not in line:
+            parts = [p.strip() for p in line.split("|")]
+            if len(parts) >= 4:
+                entity = parts[1].replace("**", "").replace("[", "").replace("]", "")
+                relationship = parts[2].replace("*", "")
+                target = parts[3].replace("**", "").replace("[", "").replace("]", "")
+                
+                if entity and target:
+                    e_id = get_or_create_node(entity, "lexicon")
+                    t_id = get_or_create_node(target, "lexicon")
+                    edges.append({
+                        "from": e_id,
+                        "to": t_id,
+                        "label": relationship
+                    })
+
+    graph_data = {
+        "nodes": nodes,
+        "edges": edges
+    }
+
+    output_path = os.path.join(core_dir, 'knowledge-lattice.json')
+    with open(output_path, 'w') as f:
+        json.dump(graph_data, f, indent=2)
+    
+    print(f"✅ Knowledge Graph extracted to {output_path}")
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    CORE_DIR = "/Users/georgesiosi/Documents/GitHub/conscious-stack/_active/cs-agent-core"
+    extract_lattice(CORE_DIR)

package/.agent/scripts/sync-agents.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+
+# Sync agents (Parent Orchestrator)
+# This script propagates the universal Agent Library from cs-agent-core to all sub-nodes.
+
+CORE_DIR="/Users/georgesiosi/Documents/GitHub/conscious-stack/_active/cs-agent-core"
+CORE_FILES=(
+    "pingala.md"
+    "standards.md"
+    "behavior.md"
+    "voice.md"
+    "sources.md"
+    "vault-schema.md"
+    "mission.md"
+    "compute.md"
+    "stack-auditor.md"
+    "knowledge-lattice.md"
+    "strategy.md"
+    "identity.md"
+    "seo-strategy.md"
+    "agent-contractor.md"
+    "roadmap.md"
+)
+
+SUB_REPOS=(
+    "cs-stack-audit"
+    "cs-website-v2.3"
+    "cs-offer-2611"
+    "cs-stackgo-v2-rocket"
+)
+
+ROOT_PARENT="/Users/georgesiosi/Documents/GitHub/conscious-stack/_active"
+DATE=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
+
+echo "🔄 Starting Agent Library Installation/Sync..."
+
+# 1. Update Root .agent (Active Instance)
+echo "  🧠 Updating Root .agent..."
+for FILE in "${CORE_FILES[@]}"; do
+    if [ -f "$CORE_DIR/$FILE" ]; then
+        cp "$CORE_DIR/$FILE" "$ROOT_PARENT/.agent/$FILE"
+    fi
+done
+
+# Sync Skills & Personas
+mkdir -p "$ROOT_PARENT/.agent/skills"
+mkdir -p "$ROOT_PARENT/.agent/personas"
+cp -r "$CORE_DIR/skills/"* "$ROOT_PARENT/.agent/skills/"
+cp -r "$CORE_DIR/personas/"* "$ROOT_PARENT/.agent/personas/"
+
+# 2. Update Sub-Repos (Installations)
+for REPO in "${SUB_REPOS[@]}"; do
+    TARGET_DIR="$ROOT_PARENT/$REPO/.agent"
+    
+    if [ -d "$TARGET_DIR" ]; then
+        echo "  📦 Syncing Library to $REPO..."
+        
+        # Sync core library files
+        for FILE in "${CORE_FILES[@]}"; do
+            SRC="$CORE_DIR/$FILE"
+            if [ -f "$SRC" ]; then
+                cp "$SRC" "$TARGET_DIR/$FILE"
+            fi
+        done
+        
+        # Sync skills & personas
+        mkdir -p "$TARGET_DIR/skills"
+        mkdir -p "$TARGET_DIR/personas"
+        cp -r "$CORE_DIR/skills/"* "$TARGET_DIR/skills/"
+        cp -r "$CORE_DIR/personas/"* "$TARGET_DIR/personas/"
+
+        # Update Manifest
+        sed "s/{{DATE}}/$DATE/" "$CORE_DIR/MANIFEST.md.template" > "$TARGET_DIR/MANIFEST.md"
+        
+        # Safety check: ensure project-specific files exist but are never overwritten from core
+        # (Though they shouldn't be in CORE_FILES anyway)
+    else
+        echo "  ❓ Skipping $REPO (No .agent directory found)."
+    fi
+done
+
+echo "✅ Agent Library Sync Complete."

package/.agent/scripts/vault-ingest.py

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+import json
+import sys
+import os
+
+def update_vault(inventory_path, vault_path):
+    if not os.path.exists(inventory_path):
+        print(f"❌ Error: Inventory file {inventory_path} not found.")
+        return
+
+    try:
+        with open(inventory_path, 'r') as f:
+            data = json.load(f)
+    except Exception as e:
+        print(f"❌ Error parsing JSON: {e}")
+        return
+
+    # Simple YAML subset generation
+    yaml_lines = ["inventory:"]
+    yaml_lines.append(f"  total_monthly_cost: {data.get('total_monthly_cost', 0)}")
+    yaml_lines.append(f"  tool_count: {len(data.get('items', []))}")
+    yaml_lines.append("  items:")
+    for item in data.get('items', []):
+        yaml_lines.append(f"    - name: \"{item.get('name', 'unknown')}\"")
+        yaml_lines.append(f"      cost: {item.get('cost', 0)}")
+        yaml_lines.append(f"      usage_intensity: {item.get('usage_intensity', 0)}")
+        if 'domain' in item:
+            yaml_lines.append(f"      domain: \"{item['domain']}\"")
+            
+    if not os.path.exists(vault_path):
+        print(f"⚠️ Warning: Vault file {vault_path} not found. Creating new.")
+        with open(vault_path, 'w') as f:
+            f.write("\n".join(yaml_lines) + "\n")
+        return
+
+    with open(vault_path, 'r') as f:
+        original_vault = f.readlines()
+        
+    new_vault = []
+    skip = False
+    for line in original_vault:
+        if line.startswith('inventory:'):
+            skip = True
+            continue
+        if skip:
+            # Check if we've moved past the inventory section
+            # A section ends at the next un-indented line or empty line
+            if line.strip() != "" and not line.startswith(" "):
+                skip = False
+            else:
+                continue
+        new_vault.append(line)
+        
+    # Insertion logic: look for 'decisions:' as an anchor
+    insertion_point = -1
+    for i, line in enumerate(new_vault):
+        if line.strip().startswith('decisions:'):
+            insertion_point = i
+            break
+            
+    # Clean up trailing/leading whitespace for the injection
+    if insertion_point != -1:
+        # Insert before decisions
+        new_vault[insertion_point:insertion_point] = [l + "\n" for l in yaml_lines] + ["\n"]
+    else:
+        # Cleanup end of file
+        while new_vault and new_vault[-1].strip() == "":
+            new_vault.pop()
+        new_vault.append("\n")
+        new_vault.extend([l + "\n" for l in yaml_lines])
+        
+    with open(vault_path, 'w') as f:
+        f.writelines(new_vault)
+    print(f"✅ Vault updated successfully at {vault_path}")
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    if len(sys.argv) < 3:
+        print("Usage: vault-ingest.py <inventory.json> <vault.yaml>")
+        sys.exit(1)
+    update_vault(sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2])

package/.agent/seo-strategy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+---
+name: SEO Strategy
+version: 1.0
+last_updated: 2026-01-17
+owner: George Siosi Samuels
+---
+
+# Conscious Stack™ SEO Strategy
+
+This document serves as the persistent source of truth for all SEO-related decisions across the Conscious Stack ecosystem. It aligns technical implementation with the 2026–2030 strategic roadmap.
+
+## 1. The Mission (Long-Term SEO Vision)
+By 2030, "Conscious Stack" (and eventually CSTACK) should be the primary organic choice for individuals and institutions seeking:
+- **Cognition Insurance** (Cognitive Security + Governance-as-a-Service)
+- **Digital Sovereignty Architecture** 
+- **High-Sovereignty Productivity Systems**
+
+## 2. The Phased Keyword Ladder
+
+| Phase | Timeframe | Target Keywords | Search Intent |
+|:------|:----------|:----------------|:--------------|
+| **1: Capture** | Jan 2026 - Dec 2026 | "tech stack audit", "too many productivity apps", "GTD alternative 2026", "simplify AI tools", "digital minimalism", "FocusMonitor" | Problem-aware, seeking immediate relief from tool overwhelm. |
+| **2: Educate** | Jan 2027 - Dec 2027 | "5:3:1 rule", "stack architecture", "cognitive load tools", "conscious stack design", "methodological debt" | Solution-aware, evaluating the CS framework. |
+| **3: Dominate** | Jan 2028 - Dec 2030 | "Conscious Stack", "Cognition Insurance", "Cognitive Governance", "CSTACK", "Cognitive Security" | Brand-aware, seeking institutional-grade sovereignty. |
+
+## 3. Target Archetypes & Search Intent
+
+| Archetype | Pain Language (SEO Entry) | Entry Point | Conversion Goal |
+|:----------|:--------------------------|:------------|:------------------|
+| **Reflective Operator** | "I feel overwhelmed by my tools", "Is my tech broken?", "Searching for digital peace" | Blog, Frequency Assessment | Book Purchase / Collective Join |
+| **Pragmatic Operator** | "Fix my stack now", "Stack audit for team", "Productivity ROI", "AI tool bloat" | Offer Page (@cs-offer-2611), Direct CTA | Pilot Program / Paid Audit |
+| **Broken Capitalist** | "Refugees from western business culture", "alternative to VC-backed SaaS", "open-source sovereignty" | Philosophy Pages, Methodology | High-level Partnership / Alignment |
+| **Institutional Buyer** | "Cognitive risk policy", "governance for AI tools", "workforce cognitive security" | Whitepaper (Feb 22), Enterprise Landing | Governance-as-a-Service |
+
+## 4. Core Entity Vocabulary (Semantic SEO)
+
+These terms define our "Knowledge Graph" for AI search engines (LLMs).
+
+- **Primary Entity:** Conscious Stack™ (Brand) → owned by Faiabrand Pte Ltd (Organization).
+- **Secondary Identity:** CSTACK (Future Legal/Software Entity).
+- **Core Methodology:** Conscious Stack Design™ (CSD), 5:3:1 Rule, 5:3:1 Protocol.
+- **Invented Concepts:** Cognitive Sovereignty, Cognition Insurance, Cognitive Security, Stack Frequency, Silicon Chaos, Attention Residue, Sovereignty Debt, High-Sovereignty Architecture.
+- **Primary Personal Brand:** George Siosi Samuels.
+
+## 5. Invented Vocabulary Rollout
+
+We do not lead with concepts that have zero search volume on cold traffic pages. We "Trojan Horse" them.
+
+| Term | Status | Implementation Strategy |
+|:-----|:-------|:------------------------|
+| **Silicon Chaos** | Active | Use in storytelling and mid-page copy. Pair with "Tool Bloat". |
+| **Stack Frequency** | Active | Explicitly used for the "Frequency Assessment". Use for SEO on diagnostic-related queries. |
+| **Cognition Insurance** | Reserved | Do NOT use in primary hero copy for 2026. Seed in Whitepapers and LinkedIn content. Aim for dominance by 2028. |
+| **Cognitive Erosion** | Active | Link to "Focus/Attention Loss" in SEO meta descriptions. |
+
+## 6. Global SEO Standards
+
+### Metadata Patterns
+- **Titles:** `[Primary Keyword] | [Pain Point/Action] - Conscious Stack`
+  - *Example:* `Simplify Your Tech Stack | Stop Cognitive Erosion - Conscious Stack`
+- **Descriptions:** 150-160 characters. Must contain 1 primary keyword. Must include a clear benefit-driven CTA.
+- **Keywords:** (Legacy but used for AI context) Mix standard industry terms (Productivity) with proprietary terms (5:3:1).
+
+### Technical SEO (AI-Centric)
+- **JSON-LD:** Every page must include Organization/Brand schema. Key pages (Protocol, Assessment) must have page-specific Structured Data (HowTo, FAQ, Service).
+- **Internal Linking:** Ensure 3:1 ratio (3 internal links to 1 external) to build domain authority for `/531-rule` and `/frequency-assessment`.
+
+## 7. Strategic Red Hat / Open Source Approach
+- **Lead with Protocol:** The 5:3:1 Rule is the entry point (Open Source logic).
+- **Monetize Governance:** Services and Enterprise software (CSTACK) are the paid layers.
+- **Copy Note:** Emphasize the "Open" nature of the protocol to appeal to "Refugees from Western Business Culture."

package/.agent/skills/agent-orchestrator/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+---
+name: agent-orchestrator
+description: Manages synchronization of core agent methodology across the multi-repo workspace.
+---
+
+# Agent Orchestrator Skill
+
+This skill ensures that all sub-repositories (nodes) are using the latest core methodology from `cs-agent-core`.
+
+## Instructions
+1.  Whenever a core file (like `pingala.md`, `standards.md`, etc.) is updated in `cs-agent-core`, run the synchronization script.
+2.  The script will propagate these changes to the root `.agent` folder and all sub-repositories.
+3.  If adding a new sub-repo to the workspace, ensure it is added to the `SUB_REPOS` list in the sync script.
+
+## Scripts
+- **sync-agents.sh**: Propagates files from core to sub-repos.
+
+## Usage
+Run the following command to sync all agents:
+```bash
+bash .agent/skills/agent-orchestrator/scripts/sync-agents.sh
+```

package/.agent/skills/agent-orchestrator/scripts/sync-agents.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+
+# Sync agents (Parent Orchestrator)
+# This script propagates methodology from the cs-agent-core repo to all sub-nodes.
+
+CORE_DIR="/Users/georgesiosi/Documents/GitHub/conscious-stack/_active/cs-agent-core"
+CORE_FILES=(
+    "pingala.md"
+    "standards.md"
+    "behavior.md"
+    "voice.md"
+    "sources.md"
+    "backlog.md"
+    "vault-schema.md"
+    "mission.md"
+    "compute.md"
+    "map.md"
+    "stack-auditor.md"
+    "knowledge-lattice.md"
+    "agent-contractor.md"
+)
+
+SUB_REPOS=(
+    "cs-stack-audit"
+    "cs-website-v2.3"
+    "cs-offer-2611"
+    "cs-stackgo-v2-rocket"
+)
+
+ROOT_PARENT="/Users/georgesiosi/Documents/GitHub/conscious-stack/_active"
+
+echo "🔄 Starting Parent Agent Synchronization..."
+
+# 1. First, update the root .agent directory (Local Agent Coherence)
+echo "  🧠 Updating Root .agent..."
+for FILE in "${CORE_FILES[@]}"; do
+    if [ -f "$CORE_DIR/$FILE" ]; then
+        cp "$CORE_DIR/$FILE" "$ROOT_PARENT/.agent/$FILE"
+    fi
+done
+
+# 2. Then, update all sub-repos
+for REPO in "${SUB_REPOS[@]}"; do
+    TARGET_DIR="$ROOT_PARENT/$REPO/.agent"
+    
+    if [ -d "$TARGET_DIR" ]; then
+        echo "  📦 Syncing to $REPO..."
+        for FILE in "${CORE_FILES[@]}"; do
+            SRC="$CORE_DIR/$FILE"
+            if [ -f "$SRC" ]; then
+                cp "$SRC" "$TARGET_DIR/$FILE"
+            else
+                echo "    ⚠️ Warning: Source $FILE not found."
+            fi
+        done
+    else
+        echo "  ❓ Skipping $REPO (No .agent directory found)."
+    fi
+done
+
+echo "✅ Synchronization Complete."