@cregis-dev/cckit 0.4.0 → 0.4.1

package/templates/bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-05-scope.md

@@ -1,219 +1,219 @@
----
-name: 'step-05-scope'
-description: 'Define MVP scope with clear boundaries and outline future vision while managing scope creep'
-
-# File References
-nextStepFile: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md'
-outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{{project_name}}-{{date}}.md'
-
-# Task References
-advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
-partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
----
-
-# Step 5: MVP Scope Definition
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-Define MVP scope with clear boundaries and outline future vision through collaborative scope negotiation that balances ambition with realism.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a product-focused Business Analyst facilitator
-- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision
-- ✅ Maintain collaborative discovery tone throughout
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus only on defining minimum viable scope and future vision
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to create MVP scope that's too large or includes non-essential features
-- 💬 Approach: Systematic scope negotiation with clear boundary setting
-- 📋 COLLABORATIVE scope definition that prevents scope creep
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
-- 💾 Generate MVP scope collaboratively with user
-- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]` before loading next step
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user confirmation through menu
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Available context: Current document and frontmatter from previous steps, product vision, users, and success metrics already defined
-- Focus: Defining what's essential for MVP vs. future enhancements
-- Limits: Balance user needs with implementation feasibility
-- Dependencies: Product vision, user personas, and success metrics from previous steps must be complete
-
-## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
-
-### 1. Begin Scope Definition
-
-**Opening Exploration:**
-"Now that we understand what {{project_name}} does, who it serves, and how we'll measure success, let's define what we need to build first.
-
-**Scope Discovery:**
-
-- What's the absolute minimum we need to deliver to solve the core problem?
-- What features would make users say 'this solves my problem'?
-- How do we balance ambition with getting something valuable to users quickly?
-
-Let's start with the MVP mindset: what's the smallest version that creates real value?"
-
-### 2. MVP Core Features Definition
-
-**MVP Feature Questions:**
-Define essential features for minimum viable product:
-
-- "What's the core functionality that must work?"
-- "Which features directly address the main problem we're solving?"
-- "What would users consider 'incomplete' if it was missing?"
-- "What features create the 'aha!' moment we discussed earlier?"
-
-**MVP Criteria:**
-
-- **Solves Core Problem:** Addresses the main pain point effectively
-- **User Value:** Creates meaningful outcome for target users
-- **Feasible:** Achievable with available resources and timeline
-- **Testable:** Allows learning and iteration based on user feedback
-
-### 3. Out of Scope Boundaries
-
-**Out of Scope Exploration:**
-Define what explicitly won't be in MVP:
-
-- "What features would be nice to have but aren't essential?"
-- "What functionality could wait for version 2.0?"
-- "What are we intentionally saying 'no' to for now?"
-- "How do we communicate these boundaries to stakeholders?"
-
-**Boundary Setting:**
-
-- Clear communication about what's not included
-- Rationale for deferring certain features
-- Timeline considerations for future additions
-- Trade-off explanations for stakeholders
-
-### 4. MVP Success Criteria
-
-**Success Validation:**
-Define what makes the MVP successful:
-
-- "How will we know the MVP is successful?"
-- "What metrics will indicate we should proceed beyond MVP?"
-- "What user feedback signals validate our approach?"
-- "What's the decision point for scaling beyond MVP?"
-
-**Success Gates:**
-
-- User adoption metrics
-- Problem validation evidence
-- Technical feasibility confirmation
-- Business model validation
-
-### 5. Future Vision Exploration
-
-**Vision Questions:**
-Define the longer-term product vision:
-
-- "If this is wildly successful, what does it become in 2-3 years?"
-- "What capabilities would we add with more resources?"
-- "How does the MVP evolve into the full product vision?"
-- "What markets or user segments could we expand to?"
-
-**Future Features:**
-
-- Post-MVP enhancements that build on core functionality
-- Scale considerations and growth capabilities
-- Platform or ecosystem expansion opportunities
-- Advanced features that differentiate in the long term
-
-### 6. Generate MVP Scope Content
-
-**Content to Append:**
-Prepare the following structure for document append:
-
-```markdown
-## MVP Scope
-
-### Core Features
-
-[Core features content based on conversation]
-
-### Out of Scope for MVP
-
-[Out of scope content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
-
-### MVP Success Criteria
-
-[MVP success criteria content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
-
-### Future Vision
-
-[Future vision content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
-```
-
-### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-**Content Presentation:**
-"I've defined the MVP scope for {{project_name}} that balances delivering real value with realistic boundaries. This gives us a clear path forward while keeping our options open for future growth.
-
-**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
-[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
-
-**Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue"
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF A: Read fully and follow: {advancedElicitationTask} with current scope content to optimize scope definition
-- IF P: Read fully and follow: {partyModeWorkflow} to bring different perspectives to validate MVP scope
-- IF C: Save content to {outputFile}, update frontmatter with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], then read fully and follow: {nextStepFile}
-- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#7-present-menu-options)
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
-- After other menu items execution, return to this menu with updated content
-- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
-
-## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
-
-ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [MVP scope finalized and saved to document with frontmatter updated], will you then read fully and follow: `{nextStepFile}` to complete the product brief workflow.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- MVP features that solve the core problem effectively
-- Clear out-of-scope boundaries that prevent scope creep
-- Success criteria that validate MVP approach and inform go/no-go decisions
-- Future vision that inspires while maintaining focus on MVP
-- A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly with proper task execution
-- Content properly appended to document when C selected
-- Frontmatter updated with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- MVP scope too large or includes non-essential features
-- Missing clear boundaries leading to scope creep
-- No success criteria to validate MVP approach
-- Future vision disconnected from MVP foundation
-- Not presenting standard A/P/C menu after content generation
-- Appending content without user selecting 'C'
-- Not updating frontmatter properly
-
-**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
+---
+name: 'step-05-scope'
+description: 'Define MVP scope with clear boundaries and outline future vision while managing scope creep'
+
+# File References
+nextStepFile: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/steps/step-06-complete.md'
+outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{{project_name}}-{{date}}.md'
+
+# Task References
+advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
+partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
+---
+
+# Step 5: MVP Scope Definition
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+Define MVP scope with clear boundaries and outline future vision through collaborative scope negotiation that balances ambition with realism.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a product-focused Business Analyst facilitator
+- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
+- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
+- ✅ You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision
+- ✅ Maintain collaborative discovery tone throughout
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Focus only on defining minimum viable scope and future vision
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to create MVP scope that's too large or includes non-essential features
+- 💬 Approach: Systematic scope negotiation with clear boundary setting
+- 📋 COLLABORATIVE scope definition that prevents scope creep
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
+- 💾 Generate MVP scope collaboratively with user
+- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]` before loading next step
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user confirmation through menu
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: Current document and frontmatter from previous steps, product vision, users, and success metrics already defined
+- Focus: Defining what's essential for MVP vs. future enhancements
+- Limits: Balance user needs with implementation feasibility
+- Dependencies: Product vision, user personas, and success metrics from previous steps must be complete
+
+## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
+
+### 1. Begin Scope Definition
+
+**Opening Exploration:**
+"Now that we understand what {{project_name}} does, who it serves, and how we'll measure success, let's define what we need to build first.
+
+**Scope Discovery:**
+
+- What's the absolute minimum we need to deliver to solve the core problem?
+- What features would make users say 'this solves my problem'?
+- How do we balance ambition with getting something valuable to users quickly?
+
+Let's start with the MVP mindset: what's the smallest version that creates real value?"
+
+### 2. MVP Core Features Definition
+
+**MVP Feature Questions:**
+Define essential features for minimum viable product:
+
+- "What's the core functionality that must work?"
+- "Which features directly address the main problem we're solving?"
+- "What would users consider 'incomplete' if it was missing?"
+- "What features create the 'aha!' moment we discussed earlier?"
+
+**MVP Criteria:**
+
+- **Solves Core Problem:** Addresses the main pain point effectively
+- **User Value:** Creates meaningful outcome for target users
+- **Feasible:** Achievable with available resources and timeline
+- **Testable:** Allows learning and iteration based on user feedback
+
+### 3. Out of Scope Boundaries
+
+**Out of Scope Exploration:**
+Define what explicitly won't be in MVP:
+
+- "What features would be nice to have but aren't essential?"
+- "What functionality could wait for version 2.0?"
+- "What are we intentionally saying 'no' to for now?"
+- "How do we communicate these boundaries to stakeholders?"
+
+**Boundary Setting:**
+
+- Clear communication about what's not included
+- Rationale for deferring certain features
+- Timeline considerations for future additions
+- Trade-off explanations for stakeholders
+
+### 4. MVP Success Criteria
+
+**Success Validation:**
+Define what makes the MVP successful:
+
+- "How will we know the MVP is successful?"
+- "What metrics will indicate we should proceed beyond MVP?"
+- "What user feedback signals validate our approach?"
+- "What's the decision point for scaling beyond MVP?"
+
+**Success Gates:**
+
+- User adoption metrics
+- Problem validation evidence
+- Technical feasibility confirmation
+- Business model validation
+
+### 5. Future Vision Exploration
+
+**Vision Questions:**
+Define the longer-term product vision:
+
+- "If this is wildly successful, what does it become in 2-3 years?"
+- "What capabilities would we add with more resources?"
+- "How does the MVP evolve into the full product vision?"
+- "What markets or user segments could we expand to?"
+
+**Future Features:**
+
+- Post-MVP enhancements that build on core functionality
+- Scale considerations and growth capabilities
+- Platform or ecosystem expansion opportunities
+- Advanced features that differentiate in the long term
+
+### 6. Generate MVP Scope Content
+
+**Content to Append:**
+Prepare the following structure for document append:
+
+```markdown
+## MVP Scope
+
+### Core Features
+
+[Core features content based on conversation]
+
+### Out of Scope for MVP
+
+[Out of scope content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
+
+### MVP Success Criteria
+
+[MVP success criteria content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
+
+### Future Vision
+
+[Future vision content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
+```
+
+### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
+
+**Content Presentation:**
+"I've defined the MVP scope for {{project_name}} that balances delivering real value with realistic boundaries. This gives us a clear path forward while keeping our options open for future growth.
+
+**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
+[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
+
+**Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue"
+
+#### Menu Handling Logic:
+
+- IF A: Read fully and follow: {advancedElicitationTask} with current scope content to optimize scope definition
+- IF P: Read fully and follow: {partyModeWorkflow} to bring different perspectives to validate MVP scope
+- IF C: Save content to {outputFile}, update frontmatter with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], then read fully and follow: {nextStepFile}
+- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#7-present-menu-options)
+
+#### EXECUTION RULES:
+
+- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
+- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
+- After other menu items execution, return to this menu with updated content
+- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
+
+## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
+
+ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [MVP scope finalized and saved to document with frontmatter updated], will you then read fully and follow: `{nextStepFile}` to complete the product brief workflow.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- MVP features that solve the core problem effectively
+- Clear out-of-scope boundaries that prevent scope creep
+- Success criteria that validate MVP approach and inform go/no-go decisions
+- Future vision that inspires while maintaining focus on MVP
+- A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly with proper task execution
+- Content properly appended to document when C selected
+- Frontmatter updated with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- MVP scope too large or includes non-essential features
+- Missing clear boundaries leading to scope creep
+- No success criteria to validate MVP approach
+- Future vision disconnected from MVP foundation
+- Not presenting standard A/P/C menu after content generation
+- Appending content without user selecting 'C'
+- Not updating frontmatter properly
+
+**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.