@cosmicdrift/kumiko-guards 0.3.0 → 0.281.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +2 -2
- package/src/guard-error-reasons.ts +13 -5
- package/src/guard-escape-hatch-declared.ts +134 -21
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "@cosmicdrift/kumiko-guards",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.281.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "AST-based security guards for Kumiko repos: direct-fs/fetch, tenant escalation, admin-API, escape hatches and related checks, run over a shared ts-morph project.",
|
|
5
5
|
"license": "BUSL-1.1",
|
|
6
6
|
"author": "Marc Frost <marc@cosmicdriftgamestudio.com>",
|
|
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
|
|
|
27
27
|
"kumiko-guards": "./src/cli.ts"
|
|
28
28
|
},
|
|
29
29
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
30
|
-
"@cosmicdrift/kumiko-repo-manifest": "0.
|
|
30
|
+
"@cosmicdrift/kumiko-repo-manifest": "0.281.0",
|
|
31
31
|
"ts-morph": "^28.0.0"
|
|
32
32
|
},
|
|
33
33
|
"publishConfig": {
|
|
@@ -21,8 +21,9 @@
|
|
|
21
21
|
* 2. `failUnprocessable(X, ...)` — same rule.
|
|
22
22
|
* 3. Object literals containing `reason: "X"` — same rule for the X.
|
|
23
23
|
* Skips `openToAll: { reason: "..." }` / `escapeHatch: { reason: "..." }`
|
|
24
|
-
* — those are prose
|
|
25
|
-
*
|
|
24
|
+
* and `declareEscapeHatch({ reason: "..." })` — those are prose
|
|
25
|
+
* access-declaration justifications, enforced instead by
|
|
26
|
+
* guard-open-to-all-reason.ts / guard-escape-hatch-declared.ts.
|
|
26
27
|
*
|
|
27
28
|
* Non-literal reasons (computed, template strings with interpolation,
|
|
28
29
|
* identifier references) are assumed to be typed-from-a-const and pass.
|
|
@@ -134,14 +135,21 @@ function scanFile(sf: SourceFile): Violation[] {
|
|
|
134
135
|
}
|
|
135
136
|
|
|
136
137
|
// A `reason` PropertyAssignment whose object literal is the initializer of
|
|
137
|
-
// an `openToAll`
|
|
138
|
+
// an `openToAll` / `escapeHatch` PropertyAssignment, or the sole argument
|
|
139
|
+
// object of a bare `declareEscapeHatch(...)` call, is an access-declaration
|
|
138
140
|
// justification, not an error-reason code.
|
|
139
141
|
export function isAccessDeclarationReason(prop: Node): boolean {
|
|
140
142
|
const objectLiteral = prop.getParent();
|
|
141
143
|
if (!objectLiteral?.isKind(SyntaxKind.ObjectLiteralExpression)) return false;
|
|
142
144
|
const owner = objectLiteral.getParent();
|
|
143
|
-
if (
|
|
144
|
-
|
|
145
|
+
if (owner?.isKind(SyntaxKind.PropertyAssignment)) {
|
|
146
|
+
return ACCESS_DECLARATION_NAMES.has(owner.getName());
|
|
147
|
+
}
|
|
148
|
+
if (owner?.isKind(SyntaxKind.CallExpression)) {
|
|
149
|
+
const callee = owner.getExpression();
|
|
150
|
+
return callee.isKind(SyntaxKind.Identifier) && callee.getText() === "declareEscapeHatch";
|
|
151
|
+
}
|
|
152
|
+
return false;
|
|
145
153
|
}
|
|
146
154
|
|
|
147
155
|
// Returns the offending string if this node is a string literal that does
|
|
@@ -6,15 +6,18 @@
|
|
|
6
6
|
* R1 raw-outside-system-scope: a TenantDb `.raw` escape used outside a
|
|
7
7
|
* `r.systemScope()` feature.
|
|
8
8
|
* R2 unsafe-raw-outside-system-scope: `ctx.systemDb.unsafeRaw(...)` outside
|
|
9
|
-
* systemScope, a job scope, an explicit `withUnsafeRawGrant(...)`,
|
|
10
|
-
* handler/hook that lexically declares `escapeHatch
|
|
9
|
+
* systemScope, a job scope, an explicit `withUnsafeRawGrant(...)`, a
|
|
10
|
+
* handler/hook that lexically declares `escapeHatch`, or a standalone
|
|
11
|
+
* function whose direct body declares `declareEscapeHatch({ reason: "..." })`.
|
|
11
12
|
* R3 system-identity-outside-declared-scope: `queryAs`/`writeAs` called
|
|
12
13
|
* with a system identity outside systemScope, `.job.ts`, an `r.job(...)`
|
|
13
|
-
* call, a `*Job` function,
|
|
14
|
-
* `escapeHatch
|
|
15
|
-
*
|
|
16
|
-
*
|
|
17
|
-
*
|
|
14
|
+
* call, a `*Job` function, a handler/hook that lexically declares
|
|
15
|
+
* `escapeHatch`, or a standalone function whose direct body declares
|
|
16
|
+
* `declareEscapeHatch({ reason: "..." })`.
|
|
17
|
+
* R4 generic-reason: `acknowledgeCrossTenant`/`unsafeRaw`, a declared
|
|
18
|
+
* `escapeHatch: { reason }`/`unsafeAllTenants: { reason }`, or a
|
|
19
|
+
* `declareEscapeHatch({ reason })` call, given a placeholder reason
|
|
20
|
+
* literal — hard-fails everywhere, not baselined.
|
|
18
21
|
* R5 unsafe-all-tenants-outside-declared-scope: an `unsafeAllTenants: true`
|
|
19
22
|
* or `unsafeAllTenants: { reason: "..." }` option, passed directly as a
|
|
20
23
|
* call argument, outside systemScope, `.job.ts`, an `r.job(...)` call,
|
|
@@ -26,26 +29,49 @@
|
|
|
26
29
|
* FunctionExpression, under any key name — e.g. `handler`, `export`,
|
|
27
30
|
* `delete`), or in an options object passed to
|
|
28
31
|
* `r.hook`/`writeHandler`/`queryHandler`/`streamHandler`/`useExtension`
|
|
29
|
-
* alongside the handler function argument.
|
|
30
|
-
*
|
|
31
|
-
*
|
|
32
|
+
* alongside the handler function argument. A standalone function (arrow
|
|
33
|
+
* function, function expression, method declaration, or function
|
|
34
|
+
* declaration) is additionally recognized when a statement in its own direct
|
|
35
|
+
* body — not a nested function's, not inside an `if` — calls the bare
|
|
36
|
+
* identifier `declareEscapeHatch` with exactly one object-literal argument
|
|
37
|
+
* carrying a literal, non-placeholder `reason` (from
|
|
38
|
+
* `@cosmicdrift/kumiko-framework/engine`'s `declareEscapeHatch`: a helper
|
|
39
|
+
* that escalates on a `HandlerContext` handed to it by its caller, rather
|
|
40
|
+
* than a `HandlerContext` from its own registration). The declaration does
|
|
41
|
+
* not propagate upward: it covers escalations inside that function's own
|
|
42
|
+
* body, not the function it is nested inside. This detection is purely
|
|
43
|
+
* lexical — the guard matches on the name `declareEscapeHatch`, not on where
|
|
44
|
+
* it was imported from, so a same-named local function clears just as well;
|
|
45
|
+
* consistent with `escapeHatch:` itself, which is likewise never checked for
|
|
46
|
+
* origin. Referenced-by-variable functions, spread options, computed/string
|
|
47
|
+
* keys, and non-literal escapeHatch/reason values are conservatively not
|
|
48
|
+
* recognized (miss, don't falsely clear).
|
|
32
49
|
*
|
|
33
50
|
* Empty reasons, `openToAll.personalData` and PII are the framework boot validator's
|
|
34
|
-
* job (access-declarations.ts), not this guard's
|
|
35
|
-
*
|
|
36
|
-
*
|
|
37
|
-
*
|
|
38
|
-
*
|
|
39
|
-
*
|
|
40
|
-
*
|
|
41
|
-
* falsely flag).
|
|
51
|
+
* job (access-declarations.ts), not this guard's — except a `declareEscapeHatch`
|
|
52
|
+
* reason, which has no boot validator behind it: an empty or placeholder
|
|
53
|
+
* reason there is never recognized as a valid declaration (see R4). Known
|
|
54
|
+
* false-negatives: multi-hop aliasing, `ctx["db"]` through an intermediate
|
|
55
|
+
* variable, and a TenantDb/system-identity handed to another function across
|
|
56
|
+
* file boundaries with no `declareEscapeHatch` call at the escalation site
|
|
57
|
+
* (declarable now, so no longer a blanket false-negative) — all conservative
|
|
58
|
+
* (miss, don't falsely flag). R5 additionally misses `unsafeAllTenants`
|
|
59
|
+
* given via an identifier, a ternary, `false`, or `undefined`, and an
|
|
60
|
+
* options object passed by variable reference or spread rather than as a
|
|
61
|
+
* literal call argument — all conservative (miss, don't falsely flag).
|
|
42
62
|
*
|
|
43
63
|
* Usage:
|
|
44
64
|
* bun guards/guard-escape-hatch-declared.ts
|
|
45
65
|
* Baseline: bun guards/run-guards.ts --write-security-baseline
|
|
46
66
|
*/
|
|
47
67
|
import * as path from "node:path";
|
|
48
|
-
import {
|
|
68
|
+
import {
|
|
69
|
+
type Node,
|
|
70
|
+
type ObjectLiteralExpression,
|
|
71
|
+
type PropertyAssignment,
|
|
72
|
+
type SourceFile,
|
|
73
|
+
SyntaxKind,
|
|
74
|
+
} from "ts-morph";
|
|
49
75
|
import { isGenericReason, literalReasonText } from "./_lib/generic-reason";
|
|
50
76
|
import { type AstGuard, type GuardViolation, runStandalone, type ScanSpec } from "./_lib/guard-kit";
|
|
51
77
|
|
|
@@ -330,15 +356,72 @@ function isEscapeHatchDeclaredFunction(fn: Node): boolean {
|
|
|
330
356
|
return false;
|
|
331
357
|
}
|
|
332
358
|
|
|
359
|
+
// The bare-identifier `reason` PropertyAssignment on an object literal —
|
|
360
|
+
// shared between the declareEscapeHatch statement check below and its R4
|
|
361
|
+
// generic-reason collector, so both agree on what counts as the reason.
|
|
362
|
+
function findReasonPropertyAssignment(
|
|
363
|
+
obj: ObjectLiteralExpression,
|
|
364
|
+
): PropertyAssignment | undefined {
|
|
365
|
+
return obj
|
|
366
|
+
.getProperties()
|
|
367
|
+
.find(
|
|
368
|
+
(prop): prop is PropertyAssignment =>
|
|
369
|
+
prop.isKind(SyntaxKind.PropertyAssignment) &&
|
|
370
|
+
prop.getNameNode().isKind(SyntaxKind.Identifier) &&
|
|
371
|
+
prop.getNameNode().getText() === "reason",
|
|
372
|
+
);
|
|
373
|
+
}
|
|
374
|
+
|
|
375
|
+
// declareEscapeHatch({ reason: "..." }) as a direct-body statement of a
|
|
376
|
+
// standalone function. No boot validator backs this form (unlike the
|
|
377
|
+
// escapeHatch: {...} property, which access-declarations.ts checks at boot),
|
|
378
|
+
// so an empty/placeholder reason is rejected here rather than left to it.
|
|
379
|
+
function isValidDeclareEscapeHatchCall(stmt: Node): boolean {
|
|
380
|
+
if (!stmt.isKind(SyntaxKind.ExpressionStatement)) return false;
|
|
381
|
+
const expr = stmt.getExpression();
|
|
382
|
+
if (!expr.isKind(SyntaxKind.CallExpression)) return false;
|
|
383
|
+
const callee = expr.getExpression();
|
|
384
|
+
if (!callee.isKind(SyntaxKind.Identifier) || callee.getText() !== "declareEscapeHatch") {
|
|
385
|
+
return false;
|
|
386
|
+
}
|
|
387
|
+
const args = expr.getArguments();
|
|
388
|
+
const arg = args[0];
|
|
389
|
+
if (args.length !== 1 || !arg?.isKind(SyntaxKind.ObjectLiteralExpression)) return false;
|
|
390
|
+
const reasonProp = findReasonPropertyAssignment(arg);
|
|
391
|
+
if (!reasonProp) return false;
|
|
392
|
+
const reasonText = literalReasonText(reasonProp.getInitializer());
|
|
393
|
+
return reasonText !== undefined && !isGenericReason(reasonText);
|
|
394
|
+
}
|
|
395
|
+
|
|
396
|
+
// Only the function's own direct body — not a nested function's, not an
|
|
397
|
+
// `if`'s — so a declareEscapeHatch call does not cover the function it is
|
|
398
|
+
// itself nested inside (miss, don't falsely clear).
|
|
399
|
+
function hasDeclaredEscapeHatchStatement(fn: Node): boolean {
|
|
400
|
+
let body: Node | undefined;
|
|
401
|
+
if (
|
|
402
|
+
fn.isKind(SyntaxKind.ArrowFunction) ||
|
|
403
|
+
fn.isKind(SyntaxKind.FunctionExpression) ||
|
|
404
|
+
fn.isKind(SyntaxKind.MethodDeclaration) ||
|
|
405
|
+
fn.isKind(SyntaxKind.FunctionDeclaration)
|
|
406
|
+
) {
|
|
407
|
+
body = fn.getBody();
|
|
408
|
+
}
|
|
409
|
+
if (!body?.isKind(SyntaxKind.Block)) return false;
|
|
410
|
+
return body.getStatements().some((stmt) => isValidDeclareEscapeHatchCall(stmt));
|
|
411
|
+
}
|
|
412
|
+
|
|
333
413
|
function isInsideEscapeHatchDeclaredFunction(node: Node): boolean {
|
|
334
414
|
let ancestor: Node | undefined = node.getParent();
|
|
335
415
|
while (ancestor) {
|
|
336
416
|
if (
|
|
337
417
|
ancestor.isKind(SyntaxKind.ArrowFunction) ||
|
|
338
418
|
ancestor.isKind(SyntaxKind.FunctionExpression) ||
|
|
339
|
-
ancestor.isKind(SyntaxKind.MethodDeclaration)
|
|
419
|
+
ancestor.isKind(SyntaxKind.MethodDeclaration) ||
|
|
420
|
+
ancestor.isKind(SyntaxKind.FunctionDeclaration)
|
|
340
421
|
) {
|
|
341
|
-
if (isEscapeHatchDeclaredFunction(ancestor))
|
|
422
|
+
if (isEscapeHatchDeclaredFunction(ancestor) || hasDeclaredEscapeHatchStatement(ancestor)) {
|
|
423
|
+
return true;
|
|
424
|
+
}
|
|
342
425
|
}
|
|
343
426
|
ancestor = ancestor.getParent();
|
|
344
427
|
}
|
|
@@ -453,6 +536,35 @@ function findGenericReasonMethodCalls(sf: SourceFile, root: string): GenericReas
|
|
|
453
536
|
return out;
|
|
454
537
|
}
|
|
455
538
|
|
|
539
|
+
// The declareEscapeHatch({ reason }) form falls through both existing R4
|
|
540
|
+
// collectors: its callee is a bare identifier, not a PropertyAccessExpression
|
|
541
|
+
// (unlike acknowledgeCrossTenant/unsafeRaw), and its reason sits directly in
|
|
542
|
+
// the call argument, not under an escapeHatch:/unsafeAllTenants: property.
|
|
543
|
+
function findGenericReasonDeclareEscapeHatchCalls(
|
|
544
|
+
sf: SourceFile,
|
|
545
|
+
root: string,
|
|
546
|
+
): GenericReasonFinding[] {
|
|
547
|
+
const out: GenericReasonFinding[] = [];
|
|
548
|
+
for (const call of sf.getDescendantsOfKind(SyntaxKind.CallExpression)) {
|
|
549
|
+
const callee = call.getExpression();
|
|
550
|
+
if (!callee.isKind(SyntaxKind.Identifier) || callee.getText() !== "declareEscapeHatch") {
|
|
551
|
+
continue;
|
|
552
|
+
}
|
|
553
|
+
const arg = call.getArguments()[0];
|
|
554
|
+
if (!arg?.isKind(SyntaxKind.ObjectLiteralExpression)) continue;
|
|
555
|
+
const reasonProp = findReasonPropertyAssignment(arg);
|
|
556
|
+
if (!reasonProp) continue;
|
|
557
|
+
const reasonText = literalReasonText(reasonProp.getInitializer());
|
|
558
|
+
if (reasonText === undefined || !isGenericReason(reasonText)) continue;
|
|
559
|
+
out.push({
|
|
560
|
+
file: path.relative(root, sf.getFilePath()),
|
|
561
|
+
line: call.getStartLineNumber(),
|
|
562
|
+
message: `declareEscapeHatch({ reason: "${reasonText}" }) uses a placeholder reason — give a concrete, reviewable justification for this cross-tenant/unsafe access.`,
|
|
563
|
+
});
|
|
564
|
+
}
|
|
565
|
+
return out;
|
|
566
|
+
}
|
|
567
|
+
|
|
456
568
|
const REASON_OBJECT_PROPERTY_NAMES = ["escapeHatch", "unsafeAllTenants"] as const;
|
|
457
569
|
|
|
458
570
|
function findGenericReasonObjectProperty(
|
|
@@ -488,6 +600,7 @@ export function findGenericReasonCalls(
|
|
|
488
600
|
const out: GenericReasonFinding[] = [];
|
|
489
601
|
for (const sf of scannableFiles(files)) {
|
|
490
602
|
out.push(...findGenericReasonMethodCalls(sf, root));
|
|
603
|
+
out.push(...findGenericReasonDeclareEscapeHatchCalls(sf, root));
|
|
491
604
|
for (const propertyName of REASON_OBJECT_PROPERTY_NAMES) {
|
|
492
605
|
out.push(...findGenericReasonObjectProperty(sf, root, propertyName));
|
|
493
606
|
}
|