@cogmem/engram 0.0.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +236 -0
- package/drizzle/0000_jittery_ender_wiggin.sql +59 -0
- package/drizzle/meta/0000_snapshot.json +417 -0
- package/drizzle/meta/_journal.json +13 -0
- package/package.json +72 -0
- package/src/cli/commands/encode.ts +71 -0
- package/src/cli/commands/focus.ts +106 -0
- package/src/cli/commands/health.ts +82 -0
- package/src/cli/commands/inspect.ts +36 -0
- package/src/cli/commands/list.ts +58 -0
- package/src/cli/commands/recall.ts +55 -0
- package/src/cli/commands/sleep.ts +102 -0
- package/src/cli/commands/stats.ts +95 -0
- package/src/cli/format.ts +231 -0
- package/src/cli/index.ts +31 -0
- package/src/config/defaults.ts +58 -0
- package/src/core/activation.ts +75 -0
- package/src/core/associations.ts +186 -0
- package/src/core/chunking.ts +108 -0
- package/src/core/consolidation.ts +150 -0
- package/src/core/emotional-tag.ts +19 -0
- package/src/core/encoder.ts +47 -0
- package/src/core/engine.ts +50 -0
- package/src/core/forgetting.ts +58 -0
- package/src/core/memory.ts +94 -0
- package/src/core/procedural-store.ts +36 -0
- package/src/core/recall.ts +102 -0
- package/src/core/reconsolidation.ts +42 -0
- package/src/core/search.ts +24 -0
- package/src/core/working-memory.ts +67 -0
- package/src/index.ts +57 -0
- package/src/mcp/server.ts +122 -0
- package/src/mcp/tools.ts +334 -0
- package/src/storage/schema.ts +97 -0
- package/src/storage/sqlite.ts +402 -0
package/README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,236 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# engram
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Human memory for artificial minds.**
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
> **Note:** This is an experiment in cognitive memory architecture. It's a research prototype, not production software.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
Every AI agent today has amnesia. They process, respond, and forget. engram fixes this — not with a smarter key-value store, but with a cognitive memory system modeled on how the human brain actually forms, stores, recalls, and forgets information.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
The name comes from neuroscience: an **engram** is the physical trace a memory leaves in the brain.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Installation
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Requires [Bun](https://bun.sh) v1.0+.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
```bash
|
|
16
|
+
# Run directly (no install)
|
|
17
|
+
bunx @cogmem/engram
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
# Or install globally
|
|
20
|
+
bun install -g @cogmem/engram
|
|
21
|
+
engram --help
|
|
22
|
+
```
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## The Science
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
engram is built on memory research. Every design decision traces back to how the brain operates.
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
### Memory Systems
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
The brain has distinct memory systems with different properties:
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
| System | Brain Region | Duration | engram Mapping |
|
|
33
|
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
34
|
+
| **Working Memory** | Prefrontal Cortex | Seconds | `engram focus` — capacity-limited buffer (Miller's Law: 7 ± 2 items) |
|
|
35
|
+
| **Episodic Memory** | Hippocampus → Neocortex | Minutes to lifetime | Contextual experiences — the *what, when, where, how it felt* |
|
|
36
|
+
| **Semantic Memory** | Neocortex | Very long-term | Facts and concepts, detached from when you learned them |
|
|
37
|
+
| **Procedural Memory** | Basal Ganglia | Lifetime | Skills and habits — immune to decay, expressed through action |
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
### ACT-R Activation Model
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
Memory retrieval uses the [ACT-R cognitive architecture](https://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/about/) (Anderson, 1993), the most validated computational model of human memory.
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
**Total activation** of a memory determines whether it can be recalled:
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
```
|
|
46
|
+
A_i = B_i + Σ(W_j · S_ji) + ε
|
|
47
|
+
```
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
- `B_i` = base-level activation (how inherently strong the memory is)
|
|
50
|
+
- `Σ(W_j · S_ji)` = spreading activation from associated memories
|
|
51
|
+
- `ε` = stochastic noise (recall isn't perfectly deterministic)
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
**Base-level activation** follows the power law of forgetting:
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```
|
|
56
|
+
B_i = ln(Σ t_j^{-d})
|
|
57
|
+
```
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
Where `n` = number of accesses, `t_j` = time since j-th access, `d` ≈ 0.5. This captures two human behaviors: **recency** (recent accesses contribute more) and **frequency** (more accesses = higher activation).
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
**Retrieval threshold**: A memory can only be recalled if `A_i > τ`. Below this, it's effectively "forgotten" — it still exists but can't be accessed.
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
**Retrieval latency**: `Time = F · e^{-f·A_i}` — stronger memories are recalled faster. Weak memories take longer (the "tip of the tongue" feeling).
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
### Ebbinghaus Forgetting Curve
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
Retention decays exponentially without reinforcement (Ebbinghaus, 1885):
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
```
|
|
70
|
+
R(t) = e^{-t/S}
|
|
71
|
+
```
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
Where `S` (memory strength) increases with recall count, emotional weight, and number of associative links.
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
### Spreading Activation
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
When one memory is activated, activation spreads along associative links to related memories (Collins & Loftus, 1975). Thinking of "coffee" activates "morning" → "commute" → "that conversation." The spreading strength is:
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
```
|
|
80
|
+
S_ji = S - ln(fan_j)
|
|
81
|
+
```
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
Memories with many connections receive *less* boost from each (diffusion). Specific cues work better than generic ones.
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
### Consolidation (Sleep)
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
During sleep, the brain replays, strengthens, prunes, extracts patterns, and discovers connections. engram's `sleep` command mirrors this:
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
1. **Replay** — refresh activation levels for all memories
|
|
90
|
+
2. **Strengthen** — boost frequently-accessed memories (2+ accesses in 24h)
|
|
91
|
+
3. **Prune** — remove memories below activation threshold
|
|
92
|
+
4. **Extract** — distill repeated episodic patterns into semantic facts
|
|
93
|
+
5. **Link** — discover temporal and semantic associations
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
### Reconsolidation
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
When you recall a memory, it temporarily becomes unstable and can be modified (Nader et al., 2000). It then re-stabilizes with updates incorporated. **Every act of remembering is also an act of rewriting.**
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
### Emotional Modulation
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
The amygdala modulates encoding strength. High-arousal emotions (anxiety, surprise) produce stronger memory traces than low-arousal states. Emotional memories decay slower.
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
## CLI Usage
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
### Encoding Memories
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
```bash
|
|
108
|
+
# Semantic memory (facts, knowledge)
|
|
109
|
+
engram encode "TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript" --type semantic
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
# Episodic memory (experiences with context)
|
|
112
|
+
engram encode "deployed v2.0 to prod at 3am, monitoring broke" \
|
|
113
|
+
--type episodic --emotion anxiety --context "project:acme"
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
# Procedural memory (skills, immune to decay)
|
|
116
|
+
engram encode "always run smoke tests before deploying" --type procedural
|
|
117
|
+
```
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
### Recalling Memories
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
```bash
|
|
122
|
+
# Associative recall — cue activates related memories via spreading activation
|
|
123
|
+
engram recall "deployment issues"
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
# Filter by type or context
|
|
126
|
+
engram recall "user preferences" --type semantic
|
|
127
|
+
engram recall "incidents" --context "project:acme"
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
# Disable spreading activation
|
|
130
|
+
engram recall "TypeScript" --no-associative
|
|
131
|
+
```
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
### Working Memory
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
```bash
|
|
136
|
+
engram focus "refactoring the auth module" # push to working memory
|
|
137
|
+
engram focus # view current focus
|
|
138
|
+
engram focus --pop # remove most recent
|
|
139
|
+
engram focus --clear # clear all
|
|
140
|
+
```
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
### Consolidation (Sleep)
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
```bash
|
|
145
|
+
engram sleep # run full consolidation cycle
|
|
146
|
+
engram sleep --report # with detailed report
|
|
147
|
+
```
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
### Inspection
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
```bash
|
|
152
|
+
engram stats # memory system health overview
|
|
153
|
+
engram health # diagnostic health check
|
|
154
|
+
engram inspect <memory-id> # examine a memory's full lifecycle
|
|
155
|
+
```
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
## MCP Server
|
|
158
|
+
|
|
159
|
+
engram exposes its cognitive model as an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server, so AI agents can use it as a memory backend.
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
### Setup
|
|
162
|
+
|
|
163
|
+
Add to your MCP client configuration (e.g., Claude Code `settings.json`):
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
```json
|
|
166
|
+
{
|
|
167
|
+
"mcpServers": {
|
|
168
|
+
"engram": {
|
|
169
|
+
"command": "bunx",
|
|
170
|
+
"args": ["@cogmem/engram-mcp"]
|
|
171
|
+
}
|
|
172
|
+
}
|
|
173
|
+
}
|
|
174
|
+
```
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
176
|
+
### Available Tools
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
| Tool | Description |
|
|
179
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
180
|
+
| `memory_store` | Encode new memories or reconsolidate existing ones |
|
|
181
|
+
| `memory_recall` | Cue-based retrieval, memory inspection, or system stats |
|
|
182
|
+
| `memory_manage` | Run consolidation or manage working memory |
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
## Programmatic API
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
```typescript
|
|
187
|
+
import { EngramEngine, encode, recall, consolidate } from "engram";
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
const engine = EngramEngine.inMemory();
|
|
190
|
+
|
|
191
|
+
// Encode
|
|
192
|
+
const memory = encode(engine.storage, {
|
|
193
|
+
content: "important fact",
|
|
194
|
+
type: "semantic",
|
|
195
|
+
emotion: "curiosity",
|
|
196
|
+
}, engine.config);
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
// Recall
|
|
199
|
+
const results = recall(engine.storage, "important", engine.config);
|
|
200
|
+
|
|
201
|
+
// Consolidate
|
|
202
|
+
const report = consolidate(engine.storage, engine.config);
|
|
203
|
+
|
|
204
|
+
engine.close();
|
|
205
|
+
```
|
|
206
|
+
|
|
207
|
+
## Configuration
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
Cognitive parameters can be tuned via environment variables or the `loadConfig()` function:
|
|
210
|
+
|
|
211
|
+
| Parameter | Default | Env Variable | Description |
|
|
212
|
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
213
|
+
| `decayRate` | 0.5 | `ENGRAM_DECAY_RATE` | ACT-R power law decay parameter |
|
|
214
|
+
| `retrievalThreshold` | -1.0 | `ENGRAM_RETRIEVAL_THRESHOLD` | Minimum activation for recall |
|
|
215
|
+
| `workingMemoryCapacity` | 7 | `ENGRAM_WM_CAPACITY` | Miller's Law capacity limit |
|
|
216
|
+
| `dbPath` | `~/.engram/memory.db` | `ENGRAM_DB_PATH` | SQLite database location |
|
|
217
|
+
|
|
218
|
+
All parameters are also configurable programmatically:
|
|
219
|
+
|
|
220
|
+
```typescript
|
|
221
|
+
import { EngramEngine } from "engram";
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
const engine = new EngramEngine({
|
|
224
|
+
decayRate: 0.3,
|
|
225
|
+
workingMemoryCapacity: 5,
|
|
226
|
+
emotionalBoostFactor: 3.0,
|
|
227
|
+
});
|
|
228
|
+
```
|
|
229
|
+
|
|
230
|
+
## References
|
|
231
|
+
|
|
232
|
+
- Anderson, J.R. (1993). *Rules of the Mind*. ACT-R Cognitive Architecture.
|
|
233
|
+
- Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). *Uber das Gedachtnis*. Memory and forgetting curves.
|
|
234
|
+
- Collins, A.M. & Loftus, E.F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
|
|
235
|
+
- Nader, K., Schafe, G.E. & Le Doux, J.E. (2000). Fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval.
|
|
236
|
+
- Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
CREATE TABLE `access_log` (
|
|
2
|
+
`id` text PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
|
|
3
|
+
`memory_id` text NOT NULL,
|
|
4
|
+
`accessed_at` integer NOT NULL,
|
|
5
|
+
`access_type` text NOT NULL,
|
|
6
|
+
FOREIGN KEY (`memory_id`) REFERENCES `memories`(`id`) ON UPDATE no action ON DELETE cascade
|
|
7
|
+
);
|
|
8
|
+
--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
9
|
+
CREATE INDEX `idx_access_log_memory_id` ON `access_log` (`memory_id`);--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
10
|
+
CREATE INDEX `idx_access_log_accessed_at` ON `access_log` (`accessed_at`);--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
11
|
+
CREATE TABLE `associations` (
|
|
12
|
+
`id` text PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
|
|
13
|
+
`source_id` text NOT NULL,
|
|
14
|
+
`target_id` text NOT NULL,
|
|
15
|
+
`strength` real DEFAULT 0.5 NOT NULL,
|
|
16
|
+
`formed_at` integer NOT NULL,
|
|
17
|
+
`type` text NOT NULL,
|
|
18
|
+
FOREIGN KEY (`source_id`) REFERENCES `memories`(`id`) ON UPDATE no action ON DELETE cascade,
|
|
19
|
+
FOREIGN KEY (`target_id`) REFERENCES `memories`(`id`) ON UPDATE no action ON DELETE cascade
|
|
20
|
+
);
|
|
21
|
+
--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
22
|
+
CREATE INDEX `idx_associations_source` ON `associations` (`source_id`);--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
23
|
+
CREATE INDEX `idx_associations_target` ON `associations` (`target_id`);--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
24
|
+
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX `unique_source_target` ON `associations` (`source_id`,`target_id`);--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
25
|
+
CREATE TABLE `consolidation_log` (
|
|
26
|
+
`id` text PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
|
|
27
|
+
`ran_at` integer NOT NULL,
|
|
28
|
+
`memories_strengthened` integer DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
|
|
29
|
+
`memories_pruned` integer DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
|
|
30
|
+
`facts_extracted` integer DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
|
|
31
|
+
`associations_discovered` integer DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL
|
|
32
|
+
);
|
|
33
|
+
--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
34
|
+
CREATE TABLE `memories` (
|
|
35
|
+
`id` text PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
|
|
36
|
+
`type` text NOT NULL,
|
|
37
|
+
`content` text NOT NULL,
|
|
38
|
+
`encoded_at` integer NOT NULL,
|
|
39
|
+
`last_recalled_at` integer,
|
|
40
|
+
`recall_count` integer DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
|
|
41
|
+
`activation` real DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
|
|
42
|
+
`emotion` text DEFAULT 'neutral' NOT NULL,
|
|
43
|
+
`emotion_weight` real DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
|
|
44
|
+
`context` text,
|
|
45
|
+
`chunk_id` text,
|
|
46
|
+
`reconsolidation_count` integer DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL
|
|
47
|
+
);
|
|
48
|
+
--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
49
|
+
CREATE INDEX `idx_memories_type` ON `memories` (`type`);--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
50
|
+
CREATE INDEX `idx_memories_activation` ON `memories` (`activation`);--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
51
|
+
CREATE INDEX `idx_memories_encoded_at` ON `memories` (`encoded_at`);--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
52
|
+
CREATE INDEX `idx_memories_context` ON `memories` (`context`);--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
53
|
+
CREATE INDEX `idx_memories_chunk_id` ON `memories` (`chunk_id`);--> statement-breakpoint
|
|
54
|
+
CREATE TABLE `working_memory` (
|
|
55
|
+
`slot` integer PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL,
|
|
56
|
+
`memory_ref` text,
|
|
57
|
+
`content` text NOT NULL,
|
|
58
|
+
`pushed_at` integer NOT NULL
|
|
59
|
+
);
|