@codyswann/lisa 3.40.3 → 3.40.5
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/all/copy-overwrite/scripts/lisa-work-item.mjs +156 -29
- package/dist/cli/doctor-lisa-owned-artifacts.d.ts +4 -2
- package/dist/cli/doctor-lisa-owned-artifacts.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/doctor-lisa-owned-artifacts.js +46 -32
- package/dist/cli/doctor-lisa-owned-artifacts.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/doctor-lisa-owned-universal.d.ts +26 -0
- package/dist/cli/doctor-lisa-owned-universal.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/doctor-lisa-owned-universal.js +50 -0
- package/dist/cli/doctor-lisa-owned-universal.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/lisa-owned-hash-ledger.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/core/lisa-owned-hash-ledger.js +1 -0
- package/dist/core/lisa-owned-hash-ledger.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/core/upstream-evidence-manifest.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/core/upstream-evidence-manifest.js +4 -2
- package/dist/core/upstream-evidence-manifest.js.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/skills/lisa-git-submit-pr/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/lisa-git-submit-pr/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/skills/lisa-git-submit-pr/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/skills/lisa-git-submit-pr/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/skills/lisa-git-submit-pr/SKILL.md +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/lisa-git-submit-pr/SKILL.md +1 -1
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
|
|
|
132
132
|
"ws": ">=8.21.0"
|
|
133
133
|
},
|
|
134
134
|
"name": "@codyswann/lisa",
|
|
135
|
-
"version": "3.40.
|
|
135
|
+
"version": "3.40.5",
|
|
136
136
|
"description": "Claude Code governance framework that applies guardrails, guidance, and automated enforcement to projects",
|
|
137
137
|
"main": "dist/index.js",
|
|
138
138
|
"exports": {
|
|
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Add provider-appropriate linkage to the PR title and/or body without changing th
|
|
|
47
47
|
- **GitHub Issues**:
|
|
48
48
|
- If `work_item_ref` is a GitHub issue URL, `org/repo#<n>`, or `#<n>`, add a dedicated issue reference line to the PR body.
|
|
49
49
|
- Always use a non-closing reference such as `Refs #<n>`, so the merge cannot close the issue before the post-merge deploy, remote verification, health check, and terminal `done` label.
|
|
50
|
-
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `lisa-github-sync` is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) and the Work-Item Traceability check
|
|
50
|
+
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `node scripts/lisa-work-item.mjs backlink` — the one producer, which `lisa-github-sync` and the other vendor sync skills call rather than reimplement — is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) depends on that comment, and so does the Work-Item Traceability check wherever the project declares `workItem.verify: "full"` — there, a PR carrying a correct `Refs` line still fails the check without it. Post it either way: under the default `trailer` level the check does not read the tracker, but the two-way linkage a human follows is still worth having, and a project can raise its level at any time.
|
|
51
51
|
- For cross-repo issue refs, use the fully qualified non-closing form, for example `Refs CodySwannGT/lisa#614`.
|
|
52
52
|
- **Linear**:
|
|
53
53
|
- Ensure the Linear issue identifier appears in the branch name when the branch is created upstream by `lisa-implement`.
|
|
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Add provider-appropriate linkage to the PR title and/or body without changing th
|
|
|
47
47
|
- **GitHub Issues**:
|
|
48
48
|
- If `work_item_ref` is a GitHub issue URL, `org/repo#<n>`, or `#<n>`, add a dedicated issue reference line to the PR body.
|
|
49
49
|
- Always use a non-closing reference such as `Refs #<n>`, so the merge cannot close the issue before the post-merge deploy, remote verification, health check, and terminal `done` label.
|
|
50
|
-
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `lisa-github-sync` is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) and the Work-Item Traceability check
|
|
50
|
+
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `node scripts/lisa-work-item.mjs backlink` — the one producer, which `lisa-github-sync` and the other vendor sync skills call rather than reimplement — is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) depends on that comment, and so does the Work-Item Traceability check wherever the project declares `workItem.verify: "full"` — there, a PR carrying a correct `Refs` line still fails the check without it. Post it either way: under the default `trailer` level the check does not read the tracker, but the two-way linkage a human follows is still worth having, and a project can raise its level at any time.
|
|
51
51
|
- For cross-repo issue refs, use the fully qualified non-closing form, for example `Refs CodySwannGT/lisa#614`.
|
|
52
52
|
- **Linear**:
|
|
53
53
|
- Ensure the Linear issue identifier appears in the branch name when the branch is created upstream by `lisa-implement`.
|
|
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Add provider-appropriate linkage to the PR title and/or body without changing th
|
|
|
47
47
|
- **GitHub Issues**:
|
|
48
48
|
- If `work_item_ref` is a GitHub issue URL, `org/repo#<n>`, or `#<n>`, add a dedicated issue reference line to the PR body.
|
|
49
49
|
- Always use a non-closing reference such as `Refs #<n>`, so the merge cannot close the issue before the post-merge deploy, remote verification, health check, and terminal `done` label.
|
|
50
|
-
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `lisa-github-sync` is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) and the Work-Item Traceability check
|
|
50
|
+
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `node scripts/lisa-work-item.mjs backlink` — the one producer, which `lisa-github-sync` and the other vendor sync skills call rather than reimplement — is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) depends on that comment, and so does the Work-Item Traceability check wherever the project declares `workItem.verify: "full"` — there, a PR carrying a correct `Refs` line still fails the check without it. Post it either way: under the default `trailer` level the check does not read the tracker, but the two-way linkage a human follows is still worth having, and a project can raise its level at any time.
|
|
51
51
|
- For cross-repo issue refs, use the fully qualified non-closing form, for example `Refs CodySwannGT/lisa#614`.
|
|
52
52
|
- **Linear**:
|
|
53
53
|
- Ensure the Linear issue identifier appears in the branch name when the branch is created upstream by `lisa-implement`.
|
|
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Add provider-appropriate linkage to the PR title and/or body without changing th
|
|
|
47
47
|
- **GitHub Issues**:
|
|
48
48
|
- If `work_item_ref` is a GitHub issue URL, `org/repo#<n>`, or `#<n>`, add a dedicated issue reference line to the PR body.
|
|
49
49
|
- Always use a non-closing reference such as `Refs #<n>`, so the merge cannot close the issue before the post-merge deploy, remote verification, health check, and terminal `done` label.
|
|
50
|
-
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `lisa-github-sync` is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) and the Work-Item Traceability check
|
|
50
|
+
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `node scripts/lisa-work-item.mjs backlink` — the one producer, which `lisa-github-sync` and the other vendor sync skills call rather than reimplement — is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) depends on that comment, and so does the Work-Item Traceability check wherever the project declares `workItem.verify: "full"` — there, a PR carrying a correct `Refs` line still fails the check without it. Post it either way: under the default `trailer` level the check does not read the tracker, but the two-way linkage a human follows is still worth having, and a project can raise its level at any time.
|
|
51
51
|
- For cross-repo issue refs, use the fully qualified non-closing form, for example `Refs CodySwannGT/lisa#614`.
|
|
52
52
|
- **Linear**:
|
|
53
53
|
- Ensure the Linear issue identifier appears in the branch name when the branch is created upstream by `lisa-implement`.
|
|
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Add provider-appropriate linkage to the PR title and/or body without changing th
|
|
|
47
47
|
- **GitHub Issues**:
|
|
48
48
|
- If `work_item_ref` is a GitHub issue URL, `org/repo#<n>`, or `#<n>`, add a dedicated issue reference line to the PR body.
|
|
49
49
|
- Always use a non-closing reference such as `Refs #<n>`, so the merge cannot close the issue before the post-merge deploy, remote verification, health check, and terminal `done` label.
|
|
50
|
-
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `lisa-github-sync` is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) and the Work-Item Traceability check
|
|
50
|
+
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `node scripts/lisa-work-item.mjs backlink` — the one producer, which `lisa-github-sync` and the other vendor sync skills call rather than reimplement — is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) depends on that comment, and so does the Work-Item Traceability check wherever the project declares `workItem.verify: "full"` — there, a PR carrying a correct `Refs` line still fails the check without it. Post it either way: under the default `trailer` level the check does not read the tracker, but the two-way linkage a human follows is still worth having, and a project can raise its level at any time.
|
|
51
51
|
- For cross-repo issue refs, use the fully qualified non-closing form, for example `Refs CodySwannGT/lisa#614`.
|
|
52
52
|
- **Linear**:
|
|
53
53
|
- Ensure the Linear issue identifier appears in the branch name when the branch is created upstream by `lisa-implement`.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "3.40.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "3.40.5",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "3.40.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "3.40.5",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, across Claude and Codex.",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "3.40.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "3.40.5",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "3.40.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "3.40.5",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "3.40.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "3.40.5",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Add provider-appropriate linkage to the PR title and/or body without changing th
|
|
|
47
47
|
- **GitHub Issues**:
|
|
48
48
|
- If `work_item_ref` is a GitHub issue URL, `org/repo#<n>`, or `#<n>`, add a dedicated issue reference line to the PR body.
|
|
49
49
|
- Always use a non-closing reference such as `Refs #<n>`, so the merge cannot close the issue before the post-merge deploy, remote verification, health check, and terminal `done` label.
|
|
50
|
-
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `lisa-github-sync` is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) and the Work-Item Traceability check
|
|
50
|
+
- **A non-closing reference does not populate the issue's Development / linked pull requests surface, and no non-closing form does.** That surface *is* the closing-reference mechanism: a closing keyword populates the PR's `closingIssuesReferences`, while `Refs` yields only a `CrossReferencedEvent`. Measured on this repository — a `Refs`-only PR reports `closingIssuesReferences: 0`; a `Closes` PR reports 1. So the ticket-side backlink cannot be delegated to GitHub: the managed `[lisa-pr-link]` comment written by `node scripts/lisa-work-item.mjs backlink` — the one producer, which `lisa-github-sync` and the other vendor sync skills call rather than reimplement — is the **required** backlink under this rule, not a fallback for when native linkage happens to be absent. Two-way linkage (`lisa-implement` step 7a) depends on that comment, and so does the Work-Item Traceability check wherever the project declares `workItem.verify: "full"` — there, a PR carrying a correct `Refs` line still fails the check without it. Post it either way: under the default `trailer` level the check does not read the tracker, but the two-way linkage a human follows is still worth having, and a project can raise its level at any time.
|
|
51
51
|
- For cross-repo issue refs, use the fully qualified non-closing form, for example `Refs CodySwannGT/lisa#614`.
|
|
52
52
|
- **Linear**:
|
|
53
53
|
- Ensure the Linear issue identifier appears in the branch name when the branch is created upstream by `lisa-implement`.
|