@codyswann/lisa 2.53.0 → 2.54.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/project-ideation/SKILL.md +9 -0
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/project-ideation/examples/evidence-card-format.md +21 -0
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/project-ideation/examples/host-project-only.md +22 -0
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/project-ideation/examples/public-external-inspiration.md +22 -0
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/project-ideation/examples/unavailable-data-rejection.md +22 -0
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/project-ideation/SKILL.md +9 -0
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/project-ideation/examples/evidence-card-format.md +21 -0
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/project-ideation/examples/host-project-only.md +22 -0
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/project-ideation/examples/public-external-inspiration.md +22 -0
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/project-ideation/examples/unavailable-data-rejection.md +22 -0
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
|
|
|
82
82
|
"lodash": ">=4.18.1"
|
|
83
83
|
},
|
|
84
84
|
"name": "@codyswann/lisa",
|
|
85
|
-
"version": "2.
|
|
85
|
+
"version": "2.54.0",
|
|
86
86
|
"description": "Claude Code governance framework that applies guardrails, guidance, and automated enforcement to projects",
|
|
87
87
|
"main": "dist/index.js",
|
|
88
88
|
"exports": {
|
|
@@ -116,3 +116,12 @@ When the user wants to act on an idea, preserve its feasibility and verification
|
|
|
116
116
|
- Turn a PRD into tickets → `/lisa:plan`
|
|
117
117
|
- Build a ticket end-to-end → `/lisa:implement`
|
|
118
118
|
- Lock in the verification so it never regresses → `/lisa:codify-verification`
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
## Example outputs
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
Use the markdown examples in `examples/` as shape references when composing reports:
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
- `host-project-only.md` shows ideas grounded only in the current repository.
|
|
125
|
+
- `public-external-inspiration.md` shows how public, no-login external sources can inspire ideas without becoming hidden requirements.
|
|
126
|
+
- `unavailable-data-rejection.md` shows how to name missing private, paid, or unavailable data sources when demoting ideas.
|
|
127
|
+
- `evidence-card-format.md` shows the required evidence fields every Practical Idea card must carry.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Evidence Card Formatting Example Output
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## What Already Exists
|
|
4
|
+
- Lisa work items already use Validation Journey evidence markers.
|
|
5
|
+
- Skill reports can be saved as markdown artifacts and reviewed by humans.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Practical Ideas
|
|
8
|
+
### 1. Evidence-First Idea Cards
|
|
9
|
+
- User value: A reviewer can decide whether an idea is ready without asking how it will be proven.
|
|
10
|
+
- Existing fit: Uses the project-ideation report shape and Lisa's evidence-first verification rules.
|
|
11
|
+
- Data/source path: Existing local project files plus any public URLs cited in the report.
|
|
12
|
+
- Practical slice: Require each practical idea to include `Empirical verification` and `Evidence` lines before it can remain in the practical list.
|
|
13
|
+
- Empirical verification: Render this example and confirm every practical idea card includes the two evidence fields.
|
|
14
|
+
- Evidence: Text output showing all practical cards pass the field check.
|
|
15
|
+
- Confidence: high because the check is structural and does not require external services.
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## Discovery Spikes
|
|
18
|
+
- Evidence attachments inside generated reports: needs a storage and retention decision for binary artifacts.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Rejected / Not Practical Yet
|
|
21
|
+
- Treating lint, typecheck, or unit tests as the only proof for a user-facing idea: rejected because quality gates are prerequisites, not empirical evidence artifacts.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Host Project Only Example Output
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## What Already Exists
|
|
4
|
+
- CLI command registration is documented in the repository README.
|
|
5
|
+
- Skill sources live under `plugins/src/base/skills/` and are copied into the generated Lisa plugin.
|
|
6
|
+
- The project already has unit tests that verify generated plugin artifacts.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
## Practical Ideas
|
|
9
|
+
### 1. Plugin Surface Drift Report
|
|
10
|
+
- User value: Maintainers can see which source skills are not represented in the generated plugin before publishing.
|
|
11
|
+
- Existing fit: Builds on the existing plugin source tree and generated plugin artifact tests.
|
|
12
|
+
- Data/source path: Local files under `plugins/src/base/skills/` and `plugins/lisa/skills/`.
|
|
13
|
+
- Practical slice: Emit a markdown report listing source-only, generated-only, and mismatched skill directories.
|
|
14
|
+
- Empirical verification: Run the report command in a clean checkout after intentionally adding one fixture-only source skill.
|
|
15
|
+
- Evidence: CLI output showing the mismatched skill and the generated markdown report path.
|
|
16
|
+
- Confidence: high because the required data is already local and deterministic.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Discovery Spikes
|
|
19
|
+
- Skill usage frequency ranking: needs a bounded source of invocation telemetry before it can be recommended.
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Rejected / Not Practical Yet
|
|
22
|
+
- Personalized skill suggestions from private user history: rejected because the repository does not have access to private Codex usage history.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Public External Inspiration Example Output
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## What Already Exists
|
|
4
|
+
- The host project already has a command catalog and source-authored skill files.
|
|
5
|
+
- The host project can inspect public documentation pages without sign-in.
|
|
6
|
+
- Existing verification can run through CLI commands and generated markdown artifacts.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
## Practical Ideas
|
|
9
|
+
### 1. Public Pattern Checklist Import
|
|
10
|
+
- User value: Maintainers can compare their command guidance against public best-practice pages without copying private or paid content.
|
|
11
|
+
- Existing fit: Builds on the current docs and skill authoring workflow.
|
|
12
|
+
- Data/source path: A public, no-login documentation URL supplied by the user, plus local `README.md` and skill files.
|
|
13
|
+
- Practical slice: Generate a checklist of public patterns found in the external page and mark whether each is already represented locally.
|
|
14
|
+
- Empirical verification: Run the ideation workflow against a fixed public URL and inspect the generated checklist.
|
|
15
|
+
- Evidence: Generated markdown containing source URLs, matched local file paths, and unmatched public patterns.
|
|
16
|
+
- Confidence: medium because public pages can change, but the source path is accessible and citeable.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Discovery Spikes
|
|
19
|
+
- Automated freshness checks for public pages: needs a policy for when external pages may be re-fetched and cached.
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Rejected / Not Practical Yet
|
|
22
|
+
- Importing examples from a sign-in-only competitor workspace: rejected because the data source is not publicly obtainable.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Unavailable Data Rejection Example Output
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## What Already Exists
|
|
4
|
+
- The host project can read local source files, docs, scripts, and generated artifacts.
|
|
5
|
+
- The host project does not expose customer analytics, private support tickets, or paid market datasets.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Practical Ideas
|
|
8
|
+
### 1. Local Verification Gap Finder
|
|
9
|
+
- User value: Maintainers can identify skills that describe empirical verification but do not name an evidence artifact.
|
|
10
|
+
- Existing fit: Builds on local skill markdown files and existing unit tests.
|
|
11
|
+
- Data/source path: Local `SKILL.md` files under the plugin source tree.
|
|
12
|
+
- Practical slice: Scan skill files for verification sections and report entries that mention tests but no observable artifact.
|
|
13
|
+
- Empirical verification: Run the scanner against a fixture skill with one missing evidence line.
|
|
14
|
+
- Evidence: CLI output naming the fixture skill and the missing evidence field.
|
|
15
|
+
- Confidence: high because the input is local and fully inspectable.
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## Discovery Spikes
|
|
18
|
+
- Prioritize gaps by real-world usage: needs an obtainable telemetry source or a manually approved usage export before it can rank by frequency.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Rejected / Not Practical Yet
|
|
21
|
+
- Recommend ideas from private customer support pain points: rejected because the missing source is a legitimate support-ticket export or configured support integration.
|
|
22
|
+
- Recommend ideas from paid analyst reports: rejected because the missing source is a licensed data feed available to the agent at runtime.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.54.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.54.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, across Claude and Codex.",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -116,3 +116,12 @@ When the user wants to act on an idea, preserve its feasibility and verification
|
|
|
116
116
|
- Turn a PRD into tickets → `/lisa:plan`
|
|
117
117
|
- Build a ticket end-to-end → `/lisa:implement`
|
|
118
118
|
- Lock in the verification so it never regresses → `/lisa:codify-verification`
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
## Example outputs
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
Use the markdown examples in `examples/` as shape references when composing reports:
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
- `host-project-only.md` shows ideas grounded only in the current repository.
|
|
125
|
+
- `public-external-inspiration.md` shows how public, no-login external sources can inspire ideas without becoming hidden requirements.
|
|
126
|
+
- `unavailable-data-rejection.md` shows how to name missing private, paid, or unavailable data sources when demoting ideas.
|
|
127
|
+
- `evidence-card-format.md` shows the required evidence fields every Practical Idea card must carry.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Evidence Card Formatting Example Output
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## What Already Exists
|
|
4
|
+
- Lisa work items already use Validation Journey evidence markers.
|
|
5
|
+
- Skill reports can be saved as markdown artifacts and reviewed by humans.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Practical Ideas
|
|
8
|
+
### 1. Evidence-First Idea Cards
|
|
9
|
+
- User value: A reviewer can decide whether an idea is ready without asking how it will be proven.
|
|
10
|
+
- Existing fit: Uses the project-ideation report shape and Lisa's evidence-first verification rules.
|
|
11
|
+
- Data/source path: Existing local project files plus any public URLs cited in the report.
|
|
12
|
+
- Practical slice: Require each practical idea to include `Empirical verification` and `Evidence` lines before it can remain in the practical list.
|
|
13
|
+
- Empirical verification: Render this example and confirm every practical idea card includes the two evidence fields.
|
|
14
|
+
- Evidence: Text output showing all practical cards pass the field check.
|
|
15
|
+
- Confidence: high because the check is structural and does not require external services.
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## Discovery Spikes
|
|
18
|
+
- Evidence attachments inside generated reports: needs a storage and retention decision for binary artifacts.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Rejected / Not Practical Yet
|
|
21
|
+
- Treating lint, typecheck, or unit tests as the only proof for a user-facing idea: rejected because quality gates are prerequisites, not empirical evidence artifacts.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Host Project Only Example Output
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## What Already Exists
|
|
4
|
+
- CLI command registration is documented in the repository README.
|
|
5
|
+
- Skill sources live under `plugins/src/base/skills/` and are copied into the generated Lisa plugin.
|
|
6
|
+
- The project already has unit tests that verify generated plugin artifacts.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
## Practical Ideas
|
|
9
|
+
### 1. Plugin Surface Drift Report
|
|
10
|
+
- User value: Maintainers can see which source skills are not represented in the generated plugin before publishing.
|
|
11
|
+
- Existing fit: Builds on the existing plugin source tree and generated plugin artifact tests.
|
|
12
|
+
- Data/source path: Local files under `plugins/src/base/skills/` and `plugins/lisa/skills/`.
|
|
13
|
+
- Practical slice: Emit a markdown report listing source-only, generated-only, and mismatched skill directories.
|
|
14
|
+
- Empirical verification: Run the report command in a clean checkout after intentionally adding one fixture-only source skill.
|
|
15
|
+
- Evidence: CLI output showing the mismatched skill and the generated markdown report path.
|
|
16
|
+
- Confidence: high because the required data is already local and deterministic.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Discovery Spikes
|
|
19
|
+
- Skill usage frequency ranking: needs a bounded source of invocation telemetry before it can be recommended.
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Rejected / Not Practical Yet
|
|
22
|
+
- Personalized skill suggestions from private user history: rejected because the repository does not have access to private Codex usage history.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Public External Inspiration Example Output
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## What Already Exists
|
|
4
|
+
- The host project already has a command catalog and source-authored skill files.
|
|
5
|
+
- The host project can inspect public documentation pages without sign-in.
|
|
6
|
+
- Existing verification can run through CLI commands and generated markdown artifacts.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
## Practical Ideas
|
|
9
|
+
### 1. Public Pattern Checklist Import
|
|
10
|
+
- User value: Maintainers can compare their command guidance against public best-practice pages without copying private or paid content.
|
|
11
|
+
- Existing fit: Builds on the current docs and skill authoring workflow.
|
|
12
|
+
- Data/source path: A public, no-login documentation URL supplied by the user, plus local `README.md` and skill files.
|
|
13
|
+
- Practical slice: Generate a checklist of public patterns found in the external page and mark whether each is already represented locally.
|
|
14
|
+
- Empirical verification: Run the ideation workflow against a fixed public URL and inspect the generated checklist.
|
|
15
|
+
- Evidence: Generated markdown containing source URLs, matched local file paths, and unmatched public patterns.
|
|
16
|
+
- Confidence: medium because public pages can change, but the source path is accessible and citeable.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Discovery Spikes
|
|
19
|
+
- Automated freshness checks for public pages: needs a policy for when external pages may be re-fetched and cached.
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
## Rejected / Not Practical Yet
|
|
22
|
+
- Importing examples from a sign-in-only competitor workspace: rejected because the data source is not publicly obtainable.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Unavailable Data Rejection Example Output
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## What Already Exists
|
|
4
|
+
- The host project can read local source files, docs, scripts, and generated artifacts.
|
|
5
|
+
- The host project does not expose customer analytics, private support tickets, or paid market datasets.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Practical Ideas
|
|
8
|
+
### 1. Local Verification Gap Finder
|
|
9
|
+
- User value: Maintainers can identify skills that describe empirical verification but do not name an evidence artifact.
|
|
10
|
+
- Existing fit: Builds on local skill markdown files and existing unit tests.
|
|
11
|
+
- Data/source path: Local `SKILL.md` files under the plugin source tree.
|
|
12
|
+
- Practical slice: Scan skill files for verification sections and report entries that mention tests but no observable artifact.
|
|
13
|
+
- Empirical verification: Run the scanner against a fixture skill with one missing evidence line.
|
|
14
|
+
- Evidence: CLI output naming the fixture skill and the missing evidence field.
|
|
15
|
+
- Confidence: high because the input is local and fully inspectable.
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
## Discovery Spikes
|
|
18
|
+
- Prioritize gaps by real-world usage: needs an obtainable telemetry source or a manually approved usage export before it can rank by frequency.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Rejected / Not Practical Yet
|
|
21
|
+
- Recommend ideas from private customer support pain points: rejected because the missing source is a legitimate support-ticket export or configured support integration.
|
|
22
|
+
- Recommend ideas from paid analyst reports: rejected because the missing source is a licensed data feed available to the agent at runtime.
|