@codyswann/lisa 2.342.6 → 2.342.7
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/core/upstream-evidence-manifest.js +3 -3
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/hooks/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs +23 -0
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/hooks/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs +23 -0
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/hooks/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs +23 -0
- package/plugins/lisa-expo/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/src/base/hooks/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs +23 -0
- package/rails/copy-overwrite/scripts/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs +23 -0
- package/typescript/copy-overwrite/scripts/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs +23 -0
|
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ export const UPSTREAM_EVIDENCE_MANIFEST = Object.freeze({
|
|
|
314
314
|
"plugins/src/base/hooks/setup-jira-cli.sh": "a675f6b17ce7f0d6b9fb7daeba6d2bc59bcb48ef79b034076ea73b2b1e72ee09",
|
|
315
315
|
"plugins/src/base/hooks/shell-write-nudge.sh": "69839af423f8792b1e52c71097316c3264425553031627c0a2f9409a9d5becd0",
|
|
316
316
|
"plugins/src/base/hooks/sonar-secrets.sh": "bf4132e49ba18e2f7e941520c299c15aeeacfd220e489f3d2eb8397f2048157b",
|
|
317
|
-
"plugins/src/base/hooks/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs": "
|
|
317
|
+
"plugins/src/base/hooks/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs": "90affbeaed0d65c032dccfc0bd4a4b26eda291f6b61aa8b12599f41842452e0a",
|
|
318
318
|
"plugins/src/base/hooks/threshold-ratchet-families.mjs": "db14245ed89b483912af287bdee917a7a921dc21bb29b49be37fc799c05c413f",
|
|
319
319
|
"plugins/src/base/hooks/threshold-ratchet.mjs": "e1e3f22b33267212b90f915f83821559d1a45cab5b16c7164b86bd6c7b53549b",
|
|
320
320
|
"plugins/src/base/hooks/threshold-ratchet.sh": "b86f4d0b554e44fd119ad8a8920cd0ba6c9dbe779f7ee219d381cf0629453990",
|
|
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ export const UPSTREAM_EVIDENCE_MANIFEST = Object.freeze({
|
|
|
949
949
|
"rails/copy-overwrite/lefthook.yml": "28bb382b9171a04fb92ebafc1f1522b8639f5edc4fcffcc6940e7fba3460fb4e",
|
|
950
950
|
"rails/copy-overwrite/scripts/check-threshold-ratchet.mjs": "e1e3f22b33267212b90f915f83821559d1a45cab5b16c7164b86bd6c7b53549b",
|
|
951
951
|
"rails/copy-overwrite/scripts/lisa-clean-git-env.sh": "e7121a0ee9e1bf7c01cd2ab55f563dd6d9ab75990739bb6ddf571a513efa10e9",
|
|
952
|
-
"rails/copy-overwrite/scripts/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs": "
|
|
952
|
+
"rails/copy-overwrite/scripts/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs": "90affbeaed0d65c032dccfc0bd4a4b26eda291f6b61aa8b12599f41842452e0a",
|
|
953
953
|
"rails/copy-overwrite/scripts/threshold-ratchet-families.mjs": "db14245ed89b483912af287bdee917a7a921dc21bb29b49be37fc799c05c413f",
|
|
954
954
|
"rails/copy-overwrite/sgconfig.yml": "0ffe058c791d4d323f98104cf78c763bb0356d88739042060ceb86b6b1cb78d7",
|
|
955
955
|
"rails/create-only/.github/workflows/ci.yml": "ad53014bdd6cf15bfadfaef7740b6094c3c7bd044f9d176c4938154da983529d",
|
|
@@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ export const UPSTREAM_EVIDENCE_MANIFEST = Object.freeze({
|
|
|
1073
1073
|
"typescript/copy-overwrite/scripts/check-threshold-ratchet.mjs": "e1e3f22b33267212b90f915f83821559d1a45cab5b16c7164b86bd6c7b53549b",
|
|
1074
1074
|
"typescript/copy-overwrite/scripts/check-verification-coverage.mjs": "3c1d27d0668fc66a18cb014f2b607878f0a88c178a773fbe964b8e46b19e86d6",
|
|
1075
1075
|
"typescript/copy-overwrite/scripts/lisa-mutation.mjs": "7d8d24dea151ef2178807046e97aea7ebfadd9c88eb50347feb7bb4bb190227d",
|
|
1076
|
-
"typescript/copy-overwrite/scripts/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs": "
|
|
1076
|
+
"typescript/copy-overwrite/scripts/threshold-ratchet-compare.mjs": "90affbeaed0d65c032dccfc0bd4a4b26eda291f6b61aa8b12599f41842452e0a",
|
|
1077
1077
|
"typescript/copy-overwrite/scripts/threshold-ratchet-families.mjs": "db14245ed89b483912af287bdee917a7a921dc21bb29b49be37fc799c05c413f",
|
|
1078
1078
|
"typescript/copy-overwrite/sgconfig.yml": "0ffe058c791d4d323f98104cf78c763bb0356d88739042060ceb86b6b1cb78d7",
|
|
1079
1079
|
"typescript/copy-overwrite/tsconfig.eslint.json": "8a8ae5e201b18887b8eeda5eb569747221695524d4193ea03b4338b97b7fa642",
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
|
|
|
120
120
|
}
|
|
121
121
|
},
|
|
122
122
|
"name": "@codyswann/lisa",
|
|
123
|
-
"version": "2.342.
|
|
123
|
+
"version": "2.342.7",
|
|
124
124
|
"description": "Claude Code governance framework that applies guardrails, guidance, and automated enforcement to projects",
|
|
125
125
|
"main": "dist/index.js",
|
|
126
126
|
"exports": {
|
|
@@ -72,6 +72,29 @@ export function compareConstraints(relPath, base, current) {
|
|
|
72
72
|
});
|
|
73
73
|
continue;
|
|
74
74
|
}
|
|
75
|
+
// A bound's DIRECTION carries as much of the gate as its number. Flipping
|
|
76
|
+
// `rate>=0.99` to `rate<=0.99` keeps the key and the value and inverts the
|
|
77
|
+
// meaning: "at least 99% success" becomes "at most 99% success", a gate
|
|
78
|
+
// that now passes when the system is broken. Comparing only values, that
|
|
79
|
+
// read as unchanged.
|
|
80
|
+
//
|
|
81
|
+
// Rejected rather than re-evaluated in the new direction, because the two
|
|
82
|
+
// bounds are not commensurable — there is no value at which `<=0.99` is
|
|
83
|
+
// "no weaker than" `>=0.99`. The honest verdict is that the change cannot
|
|
84
|
+
// be proven safe, so it belongs in the existing allow-list path where a
|
|
85
|
+
// human records why, not in a comparison that would have to invent an
|
|
86
|
+
// ordering between incomparable gates.
|
|
87
|
+
if (currentC.direction !== baseC.direction) {
|
|
88
|
+
findings.push({
|
|
89
|
+
file: relPath,
|
|
90
|
+
key,
|
|
91
|
+
type: TYPE_WEAKENED,
|
|
92
|
+
base: baseC.value,
|
|
93
|
+
current: currentC.value,
|
|
94
|
+
message: `${relPath}: ${key} changed bound direction (${baseC.direction} → ${currentC.direction}) — the gate's meaning is inverted, so preserving it cannot be proven from the value alone.`,
|
|
95
|
+
});
|
|
96
|
+
continue;
|
|
97
|
+
}
|
|
75
98
|
const weakened =
|
|
76
99
|
baseC.direction === "min"
|
|
77
100
|
? currentC.value < baseC.value
|
|
@@ -72,6 +72,29 @@ export function compareConstraints(relPath, base, current) {
|
|
|
72
72
|
});
|
|
73
73
|
continue;
|
|
74
74
|
}
|
|
75
|
+
// A bound's DIRECTION carries as much of the gate as its number. Flipping
|
|
76
|
+
// `rate>=0.99` to `rate<=0.99` keeps the key and the value and inverts the
|
|
77
|
+
// meaning: "at least 99% success" becomes "at most 99% success", a gate
|
|
78
|
+
// that now passes when the system is broken. Comparing only values, that
|
|
79
|
+
// read as unchanged.
|
|
80
|
+
//
|
|
81
|
+
// Rejected rather than re-evaluated in the new direction, because the two
|
|
82
|
+
// bounds are not commensurable — there is no value at which `<=0.99` is
|
|
83
|
+
// "no weaker than" `>=0.99`. The honest verdict is that the change cannot
|
|
84
|
+
// be proven safe, so it belongs in the existing allow-list path where a
|
|
85
|
+
// human records why, not in a comparison that would have to invent an
|
|
86
|
+
// ordering between incomparable gates.
|
|
87
|
+
if (currentC.direction !== baseC.direction) {
|
|
88
|
+
findings.push({
|
|
89
|
+
file: relPath,
|
|
90
|
+
key,
|
|
91
|
+
type: TYPE_WEAKENED,
|
|
92
|
+
base: baseC.value,
|
|
93
|
+
current: currentC.value,
|
|
94
|
+
message: `${relPath}: ${key} changed bound direction (${baseC.direction} → ${currentC.direction}) — the gate's meaning is inverted, so preserving it cannot be proven from the value alone.`,
|
|
95
|
+
});
|
|
96
|
+
continue;
|
|
97
|
+
}
|
|
75
98
|
const weakened =
|
|
76
99
|
baseC.direction === "min"
|
|
77
100
|
? currentC.value < baseC.value
|
|
@@ -72,6 +72,29 @@ export function compareConstraints(relPath, base, current) {
|
|
|
72
72
|
});
|
|
73
73
|
continue;
|
|
74
74
|
}
|
|
75
|
+
// A bound's DIRECTION carries as much of the gate as its number. Flipping
|
|
76
|
+
// `rate>=0.99` to `rate<=0.99` keeps the key and the value and inverts the
|
|
77
|
+
// meaning: "at least 99% success" becomes "at most 99% success", a gate
|
|
78
|
+
// that now passes when the system is broken. Comparing only values, that
|
|
79
|
+
// read as unchanged.
|
|
80
|
+
//
|
|
81
|
+
// Rejected rather than re-evaluated in the new direction, because the two
|
|
82
|
+
// bounds are not commensurable — there is no value at which `<=0.99` is
|
|
83
|
+
// "no weaker than" `>=0.99`. The honest verdict is that the change cannot
|
|
84
|
+
// be proven safe, so it belongs in the existing allow-list path where a
|
|
85
|
+
// human records why, not in a comparison that would have to invent an
|
|
86
|
+
// ordering between incomparable gates.
|
|
87
|
+
if (currentC.direction !== baseC.direction) {
|
|
88
|
+
findings.push({
|
|
89
|
+
file: relPath,
|
|
90
|
+
key,
|
|
91
|
+
type: TYPE_WEAKENED,
|
|
92
|
+
base: baseC.value,
|
|
93
|
+
current: currentC.value,
|
|
94
|
+
message: `${relPath}: ${key} changed bound direction (${baseC.direction} → ${currentC.direction}) — the gate's meaning is inverted, so preserving it cannot be proven from the value alone.`,
|
|
95
|
+
});
|
|
96
|
+
continue;
|
|
97
|
+
}
|
|
75
98
|
const weakened =
|
|
76
99
|
baseC.direction === "min"
|
|
77
100
|
? currentC.value < baseC.value
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.342.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.342.7",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.342.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.342.7",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, across Claude and Codex.",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.342.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.342.7",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.342.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.342.7",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.342.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.342.7",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -72,6 +72,29 @@ export function compareConstraints(relPath, base, current) {
|
|
|
72
72
|
});
|
|
73
73
|
continue;
|
|
74
74
|
}
|
|
75
|
+
// A bound's DIRECTION carries as much of the gate as its number. Flipping
|
|
76
|
+
// `rate>=0.99` to `rate<=0.99` keeps the key and the value and inverts the
|
|
77
|
+
// meaning: "at least 99% success" becomes "at most 99% success", a gate
|
|
78
|
+
// that now passes when the system is broken. Comparing only values, that
|
|
79
|
+
// read as unchanged.
|
|
80
|
+
//
|
|
81
|
+
// Rejected rather than re-evaluated in the new direction, because the two
|
|
82
|
+
// bounds are not commensurable — there is no value at which `<=0.99` is
|
|
83
|
+
// "no weaker than" `>=0.99`. The honest verdict is that the change cannot
|
|
84
|
+
// be proven safe, so it belongs in the existing allow-list path where a
|
|
85
|
+
// human records why, not in a comparison that would have to invent an
|
|
86
|
+
// ordering between incomparable gates.
|
|
87
|
+
if (currentC.direction !== baseC.direction) {
|
|
88
|
+
findings.push({
|
|
89
|
+
file: relPath,
|
|
90
|
+
key,
|
|
91
|
+
type: TYPE_WEAKENED,
|
|
92
|
+
base: baseC.value,
|
|
93
|
+
current: currentC.value,
|
|
94
|
+
message: `${relPath}: ${key} changed bound direction (${baseC.direction} → ${currentC.direction}) — the gate's meaning is inverted, so preserving it cannot be proven from the value alone.`,
|
|
95
|
+
});
|
|
96
|
+
continue;
|
|
97
|
+
}
|
|
75
98
|
const weakened =
|
|
76
99
|
baseC.direction === "min"
|
|
77
100
|
? currentC.value < baseC.value
|
|
@@ -72,6 +72,29 @@ export function compareConstraints(relPath, base, current) {
|
|
|
72
72
|
});
|
|
73
73
|
continue;
|
|
74
74
|
}
|
|
75
|
+
// A bound's DIRECTION carries as much of the gate as its number. Flipping
|
|
76
|
+
// `rate>=0.99` to `rate<=0.99` keeps the key and the value and inverts the
|
|
77
|
+
// meaning: "at least 99% success" becomes "at most 99% success", a gate
|
|
78
|
+
// that now passes when the system is broken. Comparing only values, that
|
|
79
|
+
// read as unchanged.
|
|
80
|
+
//
|
|
81
|
+
// Rejected rather than re-evaluated in the new direction, because the two
|
|
82
|
+
// bounds are not commensurable — there is no value at which `<=0.99` is
|
|
83
|
+
// "no weaker than" `>=0.99`. The honest verdict is that the change cannot
|
|
84
|
+
// be proven safe, so it belongs in the existing allow-list path where a
|
|
85
|
+
// human records why, not in a comparison that would have to invent an
|
|
86
|
+
// ordering between incomparable gates.
|
|
87
|
+
if (currentC.direction !== baseC.direction) {
|
|
88
|
+
findings.push({
|
|
89
|
+
file: relPath,
|
|
90
|
+
key,
|
|
91
|
+
type: TYPE_WEAKENED,
|
|
92
|
+
base: baseC.value,
|
|
93
|
+
current: currentC.value,
|
|
94
|
+
message: `${relPath}: ${key} changed bound direction (${baseC.direction} → ${currentC.direction}) — the gate's meaning is inverted, so preserving it cannot be proven from the value alone.`,
|
|
95
|
+
});
|
|
96
|
+
continue;
|
|
97
|
+
}
|
|
75
98
|
const weakened =
|
|
76
99
|
baseC.direction === "min"
|
|
77
100
|
? currentC.value < baseC.value
|
|
@@ -72,6 +72,29 @@ export function compareConstraints(relPath, base, current) {
|
|
|
72
72
|
});
|
|
73
73
|
continue;
|
|
74
74
|
}
|
|
75
|
+
// A bound's DIRECTION carries as much of the gate as its number. Flipping
|
|
76
|
+
// `rate>=0.99` to `rate<=0.99` keeps the key and the value and inverts the
|
|
77
|
+
// meaning: "at least 99% success" becomes "at most 99% success", a gate
|
|
78
|
+
// that now passes when the system is broken. Comparing only values, that
|
|
79
|
+
// read as unchanged.
|
|
80
|
+
//
|
|
81
|
+
// Rejected rather than re-evaluated in the new direction, because the two
|
|
82
|
+
// bounds are not commensurable — there is no value at which `<=0.99` is
|
|
83
|
+
// "no weaker than" `>=0.99`. The honest verdict is that the change cannot
|
|
84
|
+
// be proven safe, so it belongs in the existing allow-list path where a
|
|
85
|
+
// human records why, not in a comparison that would have to invent an
|
|
86
|
+
// ordering between incomparable gates.
|
|
87
|
+
if (currentC.direction !== baseC.direction) {
|
|
88
|
+
findings.push({
|
|
89
|
+
file: relPath,
|
|
90
|
+
key,
|
|
91
|
+
type: TYPE_WEAKENED,
|
|
92
|
+
base: baseC.value,
|
|
93
|
+
current: currentC.value,
|
|
94
|
+
message: `${relPath}: ${key} changed bound direction (${baseC.direction} → ${currentC.direction}) — the gate's meaning is inverted, so preserving it cannot be proven from the value alone.`,
|
|
95
|
+
});
|
|
96
|
+
continue;
|
|
97
|
+
}
|
|
75
98
|
const weakened =
|
|
76
99
|
baseC.direction === "min"
|
|
77
100
|
? currentC.value < baseC.value
|