@codyswann/lisa 2.328.2 → 2.328.4
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/core/upstream-evidence-manifest.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/core/upstream-evidence-manifest.js +15 -12
- package/dist/core/upstream-evidence-manifest.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/sync/lifecycle-defaults.d.ts +12 -3
- package/dist/sync/lifecycle-defaults.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/sync/lifecycle-defaults.js +13 -4
- package/dist/sync/lifecycle-defaults.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/utils/usage-accounting.d.ts +42 -0
- package/dist/utils/usage-accounting.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/utils/usage-accounting.js +116 -3
- package/dist/utils/usage-accounting.js.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/skills/lisa-linear-build-intake/SKILL.md +8 -8
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/skills/lisa-linear-claim/SKILL.md +5 -4
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/skills/lisa-linear-sync/SKILL.md +19 -19
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/skills/lisa-linear-validate-issue/SKILL.md +5 -5
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/skills/lisa-linear-write-issue/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/skills/lisa-setup-linear/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/skills/lisa-usage-accounting/SKILL.md +16 -2
- package/plugins/lisa/agents/linear-agent.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa/agents/linear-build-intake.md +13 -13
- package/plugins/lisa/rules/reference/config-resolution.md +5 -3
- package/plugins/lisa/rules/reference/usage-accounting.md +37 -4
- package/plugins/lisa/scripts/queue-contract-resolution.mjs +20 -8
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/lisa-linear-build-intake/SKILL.md +8 -8
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/lisa-linear-claim/SKILL.md +6 -5
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/lisa-linear-sync/SKILL.md +19 -19
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/lisa-linear-validate-issue/SKILL.md +5 -5
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/lisa-linear-write-issue/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/lisa-setup-linear/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/lisa-usage-accounting/SKILL.md +16 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/agents/linear-agent.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/agents/linear-build-intake.md +13 -13
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/scripts/queue-contract-resolution.mjs +20 -8
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/skills/lisa-linear-build-intake/SKILL.md +8 -8
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/skills/lisa-linear-claim/SKILL.md +6 -5
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/skills/lisa-linear-sync/SKILL.md +19 -19
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/skills/lisa-linear-validate-issue/SKILL.md +5 -5
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/skills/lisa-linear-write-issue/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/skills/lisa-setup-linear/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/skills/lisa-usage-accounting/SKILL.md +16 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/agents/linear-agent.agent.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/agents/linear-build-intake.agent.md +13 -13
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/rules/reference/config-resolution.md +5 -3
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/rules/reference/usage-accounting.md +37 -4
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/scripts/queue-contract-resolution.mjs +20 -8
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/skills/lisa-linear-build-intake/SKILL.md +8 -8
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/skills/lisa-linear-claim/SKILL.md +6 -5
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/skills/lisa-linear-sync/SKILL.md +19 -19
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/skills/lisa-linear-validate-issue/SKILL.md +5 -5
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/skills/lisa-linear-write-issue/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/skills/lisa-setup-linear/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/skills/lisa-usage-accounting/SKILL.md +16 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/agents/linear-agent.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/agents/linear-build-intake.md +13 -13
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/rules/config-resolution-reference.mdc +5 -3
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/rules/usage-accounting-reference.mdc +37 -4
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/scripts/queue-contract-resolution.mjs +20 -8
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/skills/lisa-linear-build-intake/SKILL.md +8 -8
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/skills/lisa-linear-claim/SKILL.md +6 -5
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/skills/lisa-linear-sync/SKILL.md +19 -19
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/skills/lisa-linear-validate-issue/SKILL.md +5 -5
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/skills/lisa-linear-write-issue/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/skills/lisa-setup-linear/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/skills/lisa-usage-accounting/SKILL.md +16 -2
- package/plugins/lisa-expo/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/src/base/agents/linear-agent.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/src/base/agents/linear-build-intake.md +13 -13
- package/plugins/src/base/rules/reference/config-resolution.md +5 -3
- package/plugins/src/base/rules/reference/usage-accounting.md +37 -4
- package/plugins/src/base/scripts/queue-contract-resolution.mjs +20 -8
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/lisa-linear-build-intake/SKILL.md +8 -8
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/lisa-linear-claim/SKILL.md +6 -5
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/lisa-linear-sync/SKILL.md +19 -19
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/lisa-linear-validate-issue/SKILL.md +5 -5
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/lisa-linear-write-issue/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/lisa-setup-linear/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/lisa-usage-accounting/SKILL.md +16 -2
|
@@ -154,12 +154,24 @@ The implementation path should use the shared utility layer (`parseLisaUsageSect
|
|
|
154
154
|
`mergeLisaUsageEntries`, `createLisaUsageRollup`, `upsertLisaUsageSection`) rather than duplicating
|
|
155
155
|
token parsing or markdown rendering in each caller.
|
|
156
156
|
|
|
157
|
-
### Step 4 — Persist and report
|
|
157
|
+
### Step 4 — Persist, verify by read-back, and report
|
|
158
158
|
|
|
159
159
|
1. If the rendered ledger body is byte-identical to the current managed surface, return `outcome:
|
|
160
160
|
no-op`.
|
|
161
161
|
2. Otherwise write the body or managed comment through the host adapter.
|
|
162
|
-
3.
|
|
162
|
+
3. **Read the written surface back from the host and parse it.** Run
|
|
163
|
+
`verifyLisaUsageSectionIntegrity(<stored body>, { entryIds: <ids just written> })`. A write is
|
|
164
|
+
successful only when that returns `ok: true`. The host's mutation result is not evidence — a
|
|
165
|
+
Linear `issueUpdate` returned `success: true` while silently discarding every entry token
|
|
166
|
+
(2026-08-04), which is the defect this step exists to catch.
|
|
167
|
+
4. If verification fails on the body, retry the identical payload as a managed comment and verify
|
|
168
|
+
that surface the same way. Return `outcome: comment-fallback` with a warning naming the failed
|
|
169
|
+
surface and the issue codes.
|
|
170
|
+
5. If verification fails on every surface, return `outcome: blocked` with the issue codes in
|
|
171
|
+
`error.message`. **Never leave a rollup token behind whose `direct_entry_ids` names entries that
|
|
172
|
+
cannot be parsed from the same surface** — restore the prior managed content rather than
|
|
173
|
+
reporting success over an unreadable ledger.
|
|
174
|
+
6. Return the exact writable surface used, direct entry ids, rolled-up child entry ids, totals, and
|
|
163
175
|
any fallback warning.
|
|
164
176
|
|
|
165
177
|
If the host write fails, preserve the exact error text in `error.message`. Do not collapse write
|
|
@@ -179,4 +191,6 @@ failures into a generic "usage update failed."
|
|
|
179
191
|
- Never skip rollup dedupe. Child totals are keyed by stable `entry_id`, not by child ref count.
|
|
180
192
|
- Never silently drop to comments. Return `outcome: comment-fallback` so the caller can surface the
|
|
181
193
|
writable surface that actually holds the ledger.
|
|
194
|
+
- Never report `updated` on the strength of a mutation's return value. Verification is read-back
|
|
195
|
+
and parse, on every surface, every write.
|
|
182
196
|
- Never overwrite unrelated artifact body content. Rewrite only the managed usage section/comment.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.328.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.328.4",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.328.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.328.4",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, across Claude and Codex.",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.328.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.328.4",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.328.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.328.4",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.328.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.328.4",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Use the `linear-verify` skill to check the item against organizational standards
|
|
|
47
47
|
|
|
48
48
|
**Gating behavior — this is the one place auto-transitioning is allowed:**
|
|
49
49
|
|
|
50
|
-
Resolve build
|
|
50
|
+
Resolve build-lifecycle STATES from `.lisa.config.json` `linear.workflow.*` (defaults: `Ready` / `In Progress` / `In Review`); resolve the `blocked` state from the same section (`linear.workflow.blocked`, default `Blocked`) and the `human_needed` marker label from the same section (`linear.labels.build.human_needed`, default `human-needed`).
|
|
51
51
|
|
|
52
52
|
If `linear-verify` returns `FAIL` on any of the above, do NOT continue to build. **Draft the missing spec content first, then block for confirmation** — never bounce a raw "go write all this" checklist back to the creator:
|
|
53
53
|
1. **Best-effort autofill (before blocking).** Run `pre-flight-autofill` for every work item. Preserve a human bare configured key or `Confirmed: <env>`; automation writes `Inferred: <env> — evidence: <title|body|reproduction|hostname>`, `Assumption: <env> — remote default branch <branch>` for a unique reverse-map, or `Assumption: remote default branch <branch>` otherwise. Human confirmation replaces the annotation with the bare key or `Confirmed: <env>`. For a legacy bare value, use managed draft markers and current ticket content only; provider edit history is not required. A marker proves automation and requires re-annotation; otherwise unknown provenance plus conflicting evidence stops for confirmation. Resolve one exact `deploy.branches` key from the human-authored title, body, and reproduction steps or URL hostname; exclude the complete `Target Backend Environment` section and other machine-authored metadata/draft blocks so annotations cannot become evidence. A reported bug environment is an example, not a restriction. Evidence supersedes only `Assumption:`. Normalize `prod` ↔ `production` only when exactly one is configured; no other aliases exist. Conflicts stop; never infer from arbitrary branch text, URL paths/query strings, or substrings. Write through `linear-write-issue`, never overwrite human prose, then re-run `linear-verify`.
|
|
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ Use the `linear-sync` skill to update the item at these milestones:
|
|
|
112
112
|
Use the `linear-evidence` skill to:
|
|
113
113
|
- Upload verification evidence to the GitHub PR
|
|
114
114
|
- Post evidence summary as a Linear comment
|
|
115
|
-
- Transition
|
|
115
|
+
- Transition the workflow state: move from the configured `claimed` state to the configured `review` state (`linear.workflow.{claimed,review}`)
|
|
116
116
|
|
|
117
117
|
### 8. Suggest Status Transition
|
|
118
118
|
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: linear-build-intake
|
|
3
|
-
description: Linear build-intake agent. Runs one build-intake cycle against a Linear team — claims Issues
|
|
3
|
+
description: Linear build-intake agent. Runs one build-intake cycle against a Linear team — claims Issues in the configured `ready` workflow state, dispatches each to the linear-agent build flow, transitions to the configured (env-aware) `done` state on success. Symmetric counterpart of jira-build-intake and github-build-intake. Designed to be invoked manually via /linear-build-intake or autonomously via a scheduled cron.
|
|
4
4
|
skills:
|
|
5
5
|
- linear-build-intake
|
|
6
6
|
- linear-read-issue
|
|
@@ -15,21 +15,21 @@ skills:
|
|
|
15
15
|
|
|
16
16
|
# Linear Build Intake Agent
|
|
17
17
|
|
|
18
|
-
You are a Linear build-intake agent. Your single job is to run one cycle against a Linear team — find Issues
|
|
18
|
+
You are a Linear build-intake agent. Your single job is to run one cycle against a Linear team — find Issues in the configured `ready` workflow STATE, dispatch each through the build flow, transition successful builds to the configured (env-aware) `done` state — then report what happened.
|
|
19
19
|
|
|
20
|
-
Build-lifecycle role names (`ready`, `claimed`, `review`, `blocked`, `done`) are resolved from `.lisa.config.json` `linear.workflow.*` by the `linear-build-intake` skill, and name native **workflow states**, not labels. Defaults: `
|
|
20
|
+
Build-lifecycle role names (`ready`, `claimed`, `review`, `blocked`, `done`) are resolved from `.lisa.config.json` `linear.workflow.*` by the `linear-build-intake` skill, and name native **workflow states**, not labels. Defaults: `Ready`, `In Progress`, `In Review`, `Blocked`, env-keyed `{ dev: "On Dev", staging: "On Stg", production: "Done" }`. `ready` is a DEDICATED state, never the team default (`Todo`) — mapping it to the default makes every untouched backlog item claimable.
|
|
21
21
|
|
|
22
22
|
## Confirmation policy
|
|
23
23
|
|
|
24
|
-
Once you have a team key, RUN. Do not ask the caller whether to proceed, do not preview projected scope (Issue counts, PR counts, build estimates), do not offer "proceed / skip / dry-run" choices. The caller has already authorized the run by invoking you. The pre-flight configured `blocked`
|
|
24
|
+
Once you have a team key, RUN. Do not ask the caller whether to proceed, do not preview projected scope (Issue counts, PR counts, build estimates), do not offer "proceed / skip / dry-run" choices. The caller has already authorized the run by invoking you. The pre-flight configured `blocked` state outcome owned by `linear-agent` is a valid terminal state of the per-Issue lifecycle, not a failure mode — large queues and complex Issues are exactly what this skill is for. The `linear-build-intake` skill defines the only legitimate early-exit conditions (missing query, workflow states not adopted, empty ready set); ask only when one of those applies.
|
|
25
25
|
|
|
26
26
|
## Workflow
|
|
27
27
|
|
|
28
28
|
### 1. Receive the query
|
|
29
29
|
|
|
30
|
-
The invoking caller (a slash command, a scheduled cron, or a parent agent) hands you a Linear team key (e.g. `ENG`) or the literal token `linear` (which falls back to `linear.teamKey` in `.lisa.config.json`). You do not pick the team yourself. Lifecycle
|
|
30
|
+
The invoking caller (a slash command, a scheduled cron, or a parent agent) hands you a Linear team key (e.g. `ENG`) or the literal token `linear` (which falls back to `linear.teamKey` in `.lisa.config.json`). You do not pick the team yourself. Lifecycle state names are read from `linear.workflow.*` and are not your concern at this layer.
|
|
31
31
|
|
|
32
|
-
If no query is provided AND no `linear.teamKey` is configured, stop and ask. Never run intake against a default scope without explicit configuration — the side effects (
|
|
32
|
+
If no query is provided AND no `linear.teamKey` is configured, stop and ask. Never run intake against a default scope without explicit configuration — the side effects (state transitions, PRs opened, builds running) are too high to act without an explicit target.
|
|
33
33
|
|
|
34
34
|
### 2. Run the intake skill
|
|
35
35
|
|
|
@@ -42,23 +42,23 @@ The skill runs the linear-agent workflow in-session per Issue — read full grap
|
|
|
42
42
|
Pass the skill's summary block through to the caller verbatim. The caller needs the structured record:
|
|
43
43
|
|
|
44
44
|
- Total processed
|
|
45
|
-
- Per-Issue outcomes (configured `done`
|
|
45
|
+
- Per-Issue outcomes (configured `done` state → which PR; configured `blocked` state by verify → which gate; `Held` by triage → which ambiguities; Errors → reason)
|
|
46
46
|
- PR count
|
|
47
47
|
|
|
48
|
-
If the cycle errored before processing any Issues (e.g.
|
|
48
|
+
If the cycle errored before processing any Issues (e.g. workflow states not adopted — the configured `ready` state doesn't exist on the team), surface the cause in plain language and stop. Do NOT attempt to invent states: a workflow state carries a `type` and a board position, and guessing either puts an Issue somewhere no human sanctioned. Point at `/lisa:setup:linear`.
|
|
49
49
|
|
|
50
50
|
### 4. Suggest next actions when warranted
|
|
51
51
|
|
|
52
|
-
After a successful cycle, if any Issues ended at the configured `done`
|
|
52
|
+
After a successful cycle, if any Issues ended at the configured `done` state, note which env rung they reached. Terminal closure needs no separate step now: only the production/final `done` state is typed `completed`, so reaching it IS the native closure, while the intermediate env rungs are typed `started` and correctly leave the Issue open.
|
|
53
53
|
|
|
54
|
-
If any Issues ended at the configured `blocked`
|
|
54
|
+
If any Issues ended at the configured `blocked` state (pre-flight verify failed) or `Held` (triage found ambiguities), point that out so the caller knows which Issues need human attention before they can be re-claimed. The blocked ones were transitioned by `linear-agent`'s gate logic — that is correct and expected.
|
|
55
55
|
|
|
56
56
|
## Rules
|
|
57
57
|
|
|
58
58
|
- **Never run a cycle without an explicit query or configured `linear.teamKey`.** Side effects too high to default.
|
|
59
|
-
- **Never modify the lifecycle**: only the configured `ready → claimed → done` transitions
|
|
59
|
+
- **Never modify the lifecycle**: only the configured `ready → claimed → done` state transitions. Never move an Issue to the configured `blocked` state (owned by `linear-agent`) or to any state outside those three. (Exception: the configured `review` state is set by `linear-evidence` mid-flow — that's not your concern.)
|
|
60
60
|
- **Never bypass `linear-agent` to do build work directly.** The intake skill dispatches; `linear-agent` builds. Skipping the dispatch produces broken work.
|
|
61
|
-
- **Never invent
|
|
61
|
+
- **Never invent states.** Names live in `.lisa.config.json` `linear.workflow.*` (canonical) — the setup skill writes them. If a team hasn't adopted them yet, the skill exits with an adoption hint. Don't guess state names.
|
|
62
62
|
- **Never start a second cycle while one is in flight against an overlapping team.** Serial execution. Scheduling layer (when added) is responsible for not double-firing.
|
|
63
63
|
- **Stop and surface failures rather than retry-loop.** If `linear-agent` returns an unexpected response or an error, the skill records it under "Errors" — pass that through. Do not auto-retry.
|
|
64
|
-
- **Pre-flight failures are not your problem to fix.** If an Issue fails `linear-verify` (missing Validation Journey, sign-in, etc.), `linear-agent` transitions it to the configured `blocked`
|
|
64
|
+
- **Pre-flight failures are not your problem to fix.** If an Issue fails `linear-verify` (missing Validation Journey, sign-in, etc.), `linear-agent` transitions it to the configured `blocked` state and reassigns to the creator. Surface the count and move on. Do NOT try to add the missing pieces from this agent.
|
|
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ When `github.projects.v2` is present, later setup/doctor and writer preflight va
|
|
|
344
344
|
|-------|---------------|-------|
|
|
345
345
|
| `linear.workspace` | `tracker = "linear"`, `source = "linear"`, or any `linear-*` skill is invoked | Linear workspace slug (e.g. `acme`). |
|
|
346
346
|
| `linear.teamKey` | `tracker = "linear"` | Linear team key (e.g. `ENG`). The team owns the destination Issues. For source mode, projects are workspace-scoped or team-scoped per the URL passed. |
|
|
347
|
-
| `linear.workflow` | `tracker = "linear"` | Workflow **state** name per build lifecycle role — the Linear analogue of `jira.workflow`, not of `github.labels`. Defaults `{ ready: "
|
|
347
|
+
| `linear.workflow` | `tracker = "linear"` | Workflow **state** name per build lifecycle role — the Linear analogue of `jira.workflow`, not of `github.labels`. Defaults `{ ready: "Ready", claimed: "In Progress", review: "In Review", blocked: "Blocked", done: { dev: "On Dev", staging: "On Stg", production: "Done" } }`. **`ready` is a dedicated state, never the team's default** — see below. Resolve and verify with `/lisa:setup:linear`. |
|
|
348
348
|
| `linear.labels` | `tracker = "linear"` or `source = "linear"` | **Markers and the PRD lane only.** `build.human_needed` (default `human-needed`) and the `prd.*` map. The build lifecycle does **not** live here — see `linear.workflow`. |
|
|
349
349
|
|
|
350
350
|
##### Why Linear uses states, not labels
|
|
@@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ Every lifecycle skill operates on a fixed set of **roles** (`ready`, `claimed`,
|
|
|
429
429
|
|
|
430
430
|
| Role | What it means | JIRA default | Linear default | GitHub default |
|
|
431
431
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
432
|
-
| `ready` | Human signal "this is buildable; agent may claim" | `Ready` (status) | `
|
|
432
|
+
| `ready` | Human signal "this is buildable; agent may claim" | `Ready` (status) | `Ready` (state) | `status:ready` (label) |
|
|
433
433
|
| `claimed` | Agent has picked the item up | `In Progress` (status) | `In Progress` (state) | `status:in-progress` (label) |
|
|
434
434
|
| `review` | Optional post-build review hold, when a tracker/project still uses one | `Code Review` (status) | `In Review` (state) | no default review label |
|
|
435
435
|
| `blocked` | Agent stopped on triage ambiguities or external blocker | `Blocked` (status) | `Blocked` (state) | `status:blocked` (label) |
|
|
@@ -439,7 +439,9 @@ Every lifecycle skill operates on a fixed set of **roles** (`ready`, `claimed`,
|
|
|
439
439
|
|
|
440
440
|
`review` is optional. GitHub build intake skips it by default and moves successful builds directly from `claimed` to the configured `done` label. Linear and JIRA projects that still use a post-build review hold can configure `review`; projects that keep the ticket in `claimed` until terminal can omit it and lifecycle skills will skip the intermediate transition.
|
|
441
441
|
|
|
442
|
-
|
|
442
|
+
**`ready` must never resolve to the team's DEFAULT state.** `Todo` is where Linear puts a brand-new issue, so using it for `ready` inverts the gate: the lane stops meaning "a human flipped this to build-ready" and starts meaning "nobody has touched this". Measured on the first team migrated: 20 issues in the lane, only 8 ever explicitly marked ready. JIRA avoids this because `jira.workflow.ready` is a dedicated `Ready` status while a fresh ticket lands in the project default.
|
|
443
|
+
|
|
444
|
+
**Linear state resolution is `type`-aware.** When a configured name is missing, a lifecycle skill may fall back to the team's states by `type` — `claimed`/`review` → the lowest-position `started`, `blocked` → `started` or `unstarted`, terminal `done` → `completed` — but only to *read*. **`ready` has no fallback on purpose:** every candidate would be the team's default unstarted state, which is exactly the inversion described above. A missing `ready` state is reported, never guessed; it must never invent a state to write into. Missing states are a setup defect, repaired by `/lisa:setup:linear`, not papered over at runtime.
|
|
443
445
|
|
|
444
446
|
`blocked` is what every vendor agent flips to when triage finds unresolved ambiguities or the build path is blocked by something the agent can't resolve. Different from `claimed` because it explicitly signals "human attention required."
|
|
445
447
|
|
|
@@ -75,14 +75,24 @@ cost rollups under the normal pricing and currency rules.
|
|
|
75
75
|
|
|
76
76
|
## Machine-readable tokens
|
|
77
77
|
|
|
78
|
-
Every visible direct entry row
|
|
78
|
+
Every visible direct entry row has a corresponding backward-compatible 17-field primary token:
|
|
79
79
|
|
|
80
80
|
```text
|
|
81
81
|
<!-- lisa:usage-entry entry_id=<id> flow=<flow> run_id=<run-id> provider=<provider> model=<model> source=<source> input_tokens=<n|null> cached_input_tokens=<n|null> output_tokens=<n|null> reasoning_tokens=<n|null> total_tokens=<n|null> cost=<decimal|null> currency=<code|null> pricing_status=<status> pricing_source=<ref|null> artifact_ref=<ref> parent_artifact_ref=<ref-or-empty> -->
|
|
82
82
|
```
|
|
83
83
|
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
84
|
+
**Entry tokens are never rendered inside a table row.** They occupy their own lines below the
|
|
85
|
+
visible table, and they correlate to their rows by `entry_id`, not by position. Hosts that
|
|
86
|
+
normalize markdown re-serialize a table from its parsed cell model and discard anything that is
|
|
87
|
+
not a cell: measured against Linear on 2026-08-04, an HTML comment trailing a table row is
|
|
88
|
+
destroyed on write while the same comment on its own line round-trips byte-identically. The
|
|
89
|
+
row-trailing layout therefore produced a ledger that reported a successful write, rendered
|
|
90
|
+
correctly for humans, and enumerated **zero** entries — with a surviving rollup token still naming
|
|
91
|
+
them. Parsing is position-agnostic and always has been, so sections written in the historical
|
|
92
|
+
row-trailing layout still enumerate, and migrate to the own-line layout on their next rewrite.
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
The primary token is immediately followed on the same line by a correlated measured-subset
|
|
95
|
+
extension. Writers serialize an omitted value as `null` instead of `undefined`:
|
|
86
96
|
|
|
87
97
|
```text
|
|
88
98
|
<!-- lisa:usage-entry-measured-subset entry_id=<id> measured_subset_tokens=<n|null> -->
|
|
@@ -141,7 +151,9 @@ _Managed by Lisa. Regenerated on each usage update; do not edit by hand._
|
|
|
141
151
|
|
|
142
152
|
| Flow | Model | Source | Tokens | Cost |
|
|
143
153
|
|---|---|---|---:|---:|
|
|
144
|
-
| ...human-readable rows
|
|
154
|
+
| ...human-readable rows, cells only, no tokens... |
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
<!-- lisa:usage-entry ... --> <!-- lisa:usage-entry-measured-subset ... -->
|
|
145
157
|
|
|
146
158
|
### Rollup
|
|
147
159
|
|
|
@@ -154,8 +166,29 @@ _Managed by Lisa. Regenerated on each usage update; do not edit by hand._
|
|
|
154
166
|
<!-- lisa:usage-rollup ... -->
|
|
155
167
|
```
|
|
156
168
|
|
|
169
|
+
Every machine-readable token sits on its own line, outside every table. One entry contributes one
|
|
170
|
+
token line; multiple entries contribute consecutive token lines in the same order as their visible
|
|
171
|
+
rows.
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
157
173
|
Writers may add host-specific surrounding prose, but they must preserve the heading, the managed-note line, the direct-entry tokens, and the single rollup token.
|
|
158
174
|
|
|
175
|
+
## Write verification
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
A write surface can accept a section, report success, and silently destroy part of it. **Verify
|
|
178
|
+
every managed write by reading the stored bytes back and parsing them — never by the mutation's
|
|
179
|
+
return value.** A write is successful only when the stored surface satisfies the rollup/entry
|
|
180
|
+
agreement invariant below. A caller that cannot verify a surface must fall back to one it can, or
|
|
181
|
+
fail loudly; it must never report success over an unreadable ledger.
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
- Every `entry_id` in the rollup's `direct_entry_ids` resolves to a parseable direct entry in the
|
|
184
|
+
same section.
|
|
185
|
+
- Every parseable direct entry in the section appears in the rollup's `direct_entry_ids`.
|
|
186
|
+
- Every entry the caller just wrote is parseable from the stored surface.
|
|
187
|
+
|
|
188
|
+
`verifyLisaUsageSectionIntegrity` in the shared utility layer implements exactly these checks and
|
|
189
|
+
returns structured issue codes (`missing-section`, `missing-entry-token`, `missing-rollup-token`,
|
|
190
|
+
`unrecorded-entry`). Callers run it against the read-back body, not against the payload they sent.
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
159
192
|
## Rollup and dedupe behavior
|
|
160
193
|
|
|
161
194
|
Rollups aggregate descendant usage from native tracker hierarchy, documented generated-work references, and explicit `parent_artifact_ref` links. Within one artifact rollup:
|