@codyswann/lisa 2.268.1 → 2.269.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (62) hide show
  1. package/dist/core/upstream-evidence-manifest.d.ts.map +1 -1
  2. package/dist/core/upstream-evidence-manifest.js +3 -2
  3. package/dist/core/upstream-evidence-manifest.js.map +1 -1
  4. package/package.json +1 -1
  5. package/plugins/lisa/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  6. package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  7. package/plugins/lisa/rules/eager/convergent-review.md +6 -1
  8. package/plugins/lisa/rules/reference/convergent-review.md +46 -1
  9. package/plugins/lisa-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
  10. package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  11. package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  12. package/plugins/lisa-cdk-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
  13. package/plugins/lisa-cdk-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  14. package/plugins/lisa-cdk-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  15. package/plugins/lisa-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  16. package/plugins/lisa-copilot/rules/eager/convergent-review.md +6 -1
  17. package/plugins/lisa-copilot/rules/reference/convergent-review.md +46 -1
  18. package/plugins/lisa-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  19. package/plugins/lisa-cursor/rules/convergent-review-reference.mdc +46 -1
  20. package/plugins/lisa-cursor/rules/convergent-review.mdc +6 -1
  21. package/plugins/lisa-expo/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  22. package/plugins/lisa-expo/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  23. package/plugins/lisa-expo-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
  24. package/plugins/lisa-expo-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  25. package/plugins/lisa-expo-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  26. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  27. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  28. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
  29. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  30. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  31. package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  32. package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  33. package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
  34. package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  35. package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  36. package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  37. package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  38. package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
  39. package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  40. package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  41. package/plugins/lisa-phaser/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  42. package/plugins/lisa-phaser/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  43. package/plugins/lisa-phaser-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
  44. package/plugins/lisa-phaser-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  45. package/plugins/lisa-phaser-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  46. package/plugins/lisa-rails/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  47. package/plugins/lisa-rails/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  48. package/plugins/lisa-rails-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
  49. package/plugins/lisa-rails-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  50. package/plugins/lisa-rails-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  51. package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  52. package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  53. package/plugins/lisa-typescript-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
  54. package/plugins/lisa-typescript-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  55. package/plugins/lisa-typescript-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  56. package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  57. package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  58. package/plugins/lisa-wiki-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
  59. package/plugins/lisa-wiki-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  60. package/plugins/lisa-wiki-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  61. package/plugins/src/base/rules/eager/convergent-review.md +6 -1
  62. package/plugins/src/base/rules/reference/convergent-review.md +46 -1
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@
109
109
  "brace-expansion": ">=5.0.6"
110
110
  },
111
111
  "name": "@codyswann/lisa",
112
- "version": "2.268.1",
112
+ "version": "2.269.0",
113
113
  "description": "Claude Code governance framework that applies guardrails, guidance, and automated enforcement to projects",
114
114
  "main": "dist/index.js",
115
115
  "exports": {
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Universal governance — agents, skills, commands, hooks, and rules for all projects",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Universal governance: agents, skills, commands, hooks, and rules for all projects.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ Review exists to get correct work merged, not to keep a PR in review orbit.
7
7
  are non-blocking unless the work item or repository rules make them release
8
8
  criteria.
9
9
  - Every finding must state severity, blocking yes/no, a concrete failure
10
- scenario, evidence, and the smallest actionable fix.
10
+ scenario, evidence, and the smallest actionable fix — plus
11
+ `invariant_violated` (the property at risk) and `machinery_to_remove` (what
12
+ becomes deletable, or `none`), required for `readiness-rubric` findings and
13
+ recommended elsewhere.
14
+ - Present findings highest-consequence first, by severity and blast radius, not
15
+ by discovery order. Report section order stays stable.
11
16
  - A blocking finding without a concrete failure scenario is malformed by
12
17
  contract; downgrade it to non-blocking and ask for evidence.
13
18
  - Resolve each finding as `fixed`, `deferred`, or `pushed-back`. If the reviewer
@@ -33,12 +33,57 @@ Every finding must state:
33
33
  - Evidence: the file, command output, observed behavior, ticket text, or
34
34
  external constraint proving the scenario is reachable.
35
35
  - Fix: the smallest actionable correction, or the reason no code change is
36
- needed.
36
+ needed. The correction belongs at the **owning boundary** that permitted the
37
+ failure, not at the symptom site.
38
+ - `invariant_violated`: the named property the system is supposed to hold that
39
+ this finding puts at risk — for example "the artifact that ships is the
40
+ artifact CI validated". The invariant is the property; the failure scenario is
41
+ the outcome when it breaks. State both; they are not interchangeable.
42
+ - `machinery_to_remove`: the redundant checks, workarounds, or scaffolding that
43
+ become deletable once the correction lands, or explicitly `none`. This is a
44
+ **scaffolding-subtraction candidate** — it is surfaced for a human or the
45
+ implementer to act on and is never auto-deleted by any review pass.
37
46
 
38
47
  A finding marked blocking without a concrete failure scenario is malformed by
39
48
  contract. Downgrade it to non-blocking and ask for evidence instead of treating
40
49
  it as a merge blocker.
41
50
 
51
+ ### Compatibility
52
+
53
+ `invariant_violated` and `machinery_to_remove` are **required for findings
54
+ emitted under the `readiness-rubric`** and **recommended everywhere else**. A
55
+ finding from an existing product, quality, local, bot-parity, or suggestion
56
+ implementation pass that omits them is still well-formed by contract — this
57
+ extension is additive and never retroactively malforms a shipped review surface.
58
+
59
+ ### Readiness findings map onto this shape
60
+
61
+ A readiness finding names five fields. All five bind to this contract, so there
62
+ is no second findings format anywhere in the repository:
63
+
64
+ | Readiness field | Contract field |
65
+ |---|---|
66
+ | the at-risk invariant | `invariant_violated` (above) |
67
+ | `evidence` | `Evidence` |
68
+ | `why_proof_missed` | `Evidence`, extended with a required proof-gap clause: why the existing proof machinery did not catch this |
69
+ | `root_correction` | `Fix`, qualified: the correction goes at the owning boundary, not the symptom site |
70
+ | redundant machinery | `machinery_to_remove` (above) |
71
+
72
+ Anything that needs a sixth field extends this section rather than starting a
73
+ parallel format.
74
+
75
+ ### Consequence Ordering
76
+
77
+ Findings are presented **highest-consequence first**. Consequence is determined
78
+ by severity and blast radius — how much of the system, how many users, and how
79
+ irreversible the outcome — not by discovery order, file order, or the order a
80
+ tool happened to emit them in. Two reviewers ordering the same finding set
81
+ differently is a defect, not a preference.
82
+
83
+ This governs the order of findings **within** a section only. Report section
84
+ order stays stable and is unaffected: never reorder, merge, or silently omit a
85
+ section to surface a finding earlier.
86
+
42
87
  ## Dispositions
43
88
 
44
89
  The implementer resolves each finding with exactly one disposition:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Universal governance — agents, skills, commands, hooks, and rules for all projects",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-cdk",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "AWS CDK-specific plugin",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-cdk",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "AWS CDK-specific Lisa plugin.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-cdk",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "AWS CDK-specific plugin",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-cdk",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "AWS CDK-specific plugin",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-cdk",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "AWS CDK-specific plugin",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Universal governance — agents, skills, commands, hooks, and rules for all projects",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ Review exists to get correct work merged, not to keep a PR in review orbit.
7
7
  are non-blocking unless the work item or repository rules make them release
8
8
  criteria.
9
9
  - Every finding must state severity, blocking yes/no, a concrete failure
10
- scenario, evidence, and the smallest actionable fix.
10
+ scenario, evidence, and the smallest actionable fix — plus
11
+ `invariant_violated` (the property at risk) and `machinery_to_remove` (what
12
+ becomes deletable, or `none`), required for `readiness-rubric` findings and
13
+ recommended elsewhere.
14
+ - Present findings highest-consequence first, by severity and blast radius, not
15
+ by discovery order. Report section order stays stable.
11
16
  - A blocking finding without a concrete failure scenario is malformed by
12
17
  contract; downgrade it to non-blocking and ask for evidence.
13
18
  - Resolve each finding as `fixed`, `deferred`, or `pushed-back`. If the reviewer
@@ -33,12 +33,57 @@ Every finding must state:
33
33
  - Evidence: the file, command output, observed behavior, ticket text, or
34
34
  external constraint proving the scenario is reachable.
35
35
  - Fix: the smallest actionable correction, or the reason no code change is
36
- needed.
36
+ needed. The correction belongs at the **owning boundary** that permitted the
37
+ failure, not at the symptom site.
38
+ - `invariant_violated`: the named property the system is supposed to hold that
39
+ this finding puts at risk — for example "the artifact that ships is the
40
+ artifact CI validated". The invariant is the property; the failure scenario is
41
+ the outcome when it breaks. State both; they are not interchangeable.
42
+ - `machinery_to_remove`: the redundant checks, workarounds, or scaffolding that
43
+ become deletable once the correction lands, or explicitly `none`. This is a
44
+ **scaffolding-subtraction candidate** — it is surfaced for a human or the
45
+ implementer to act on and is never auto-deleted by any review pass.
37
46
 
38
47
  A finding marked blocking without a concrete failure scenario is malformed by
39
48
  contract. Downgrade it to non-blocking and ask for evidence instead of treating
40
49
  it as a merge blocker.
41
50
 
51
+ ### Compatibility
52
+
53
+ `invariant_violated` and `machinery_to_remove` are **required for findings
54
+ emitted under the `readiness-rubric`** and **recommended everywhere else**. A
55
+ finding from an existing product, quality, local, bot-parity, or suggestion
56
+ implementation pass that omits them is still well-formed by contract — this
57
+ extension is additive and never retroactively malforms a shipped review surface.
58
+
59
+ ### Readiness findings map onto this shape
60
+
61
+ A readiness finding names five fields. All five bind to this contract, so there
62
+ is no second findings format anywhere in the repository:
63
+
64
+ | Readiness field | Contract field |
65
+ |---|---|
66
+ | the at-risk invariant | `invariant_violated` (above) |
67
+ | `evidence` | `Evidence` |
68
+ | `why_proof_missed` | `Evidence`, extended with a required proof-gap clause: why the existing proof machinery did not catch this |
69
+ | `root_correction` | `Fix`, qualified: the correction goes at the owning boundary, not the symptom site |
70
+ | redundant machinery | `machinery_to_remove` (above) |
71
+
72
+ Anything that needs a sixth field extends this section rather than starting a
73
+ parallel format.
74
+
75
+ ### Consequence Ordering
76
+
77
+ Findings are presented **highest-consequence first**. Consequence is determined
78
+ by severity and blast radius — how much of the system, how many users, and how
79
+ irreversible the outcome — not by discovery order, file order, or the order a
80
+ tool happened to emit them in. Two reviewers ordering the same finding set
81
+ differently is a defect, not a preference.
82
+
83
+ This governs the order of findings **within** a section only. Report section
84
+ order stays stable and is unaffected: never reorder, merge, or silently omit a
85
+ section to surface a finding earlier.
86
+
42
87
  ## Dispositions
43
88
 
44
89
  The implementer resolves each finding with exactly one disposition:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Universal governance — agents, skills, commands, hooks, and rules for all projects",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -38,12 +38,57 @@ Every finding must state:
38
38
  - Evidence: the file, command output, observed behavior, ticket text, or
39
39
  external constraint proving the scenario is reachable.
40
40
  - Fix: the smallest actionable correction, or the reason no code change is
41
- needed.
41
+ needed. The correction belongs at the **owning boundary** that permitted the
42
+ failure, not at the symptom site.
43
+ - `invariant_violated`: the named property the system is supposed to hold that
44
+ this finding puts at risk — for example "the artifact that ships is the
45
+ artifact CI validated". The invariant is the property; the failure scenario is
46
+ the outcome when it breaks. State both; they are not interchangeable.
47
+ - `machinery_to_remove`: the redundant checks, workarounds, or scaffolding that
48
+ become deletable once the correction lands, or explicitly `none`. This is a
49
+ **scaffolding-subtraction candidate** — it is surfaced for a human or the
50
+ implementer to act on and is never auto-deleted by any review pass.
42
51
 
43
52
  A finding marked blocking without a concrete failure scenario is malformed by
44
53
  contract. Downgrade it to non-blocking and ask for evidence instead of treating
45
54
  it as a merge blocker.
46
55
 
56
+ ### Compatibility
57
+
58
+ `invariant_violated` and `machinery_to_remove` are **required for findings
59
+ emitted under the `readiness-rubric`** and **recommended everywhere else**. A
60
+ finding from an existing product, quality, local, bot-parity, or suggestion
61
+ implementation pass that omits them is still well-formed by contract — this
62
+ extension is additive and never retroactively malforms a shipped review surface.
63
+
64
+ ### Readiness findings map onto this shape
65
+
66
+ A readiness finding names five fields. All five bind to this contract, so there
67
+ is no second findings format anywhere in the repository:
68
+
69
+ | Readiness field | Contract field |
70
+ |---|---|
71
+ | the at-risk invariant | `invariant_violated` (above) |
72
+ | `evidence` | `Evidence` |
73
+ | `why_proof_missed` | `Evidence`, extended with a required proof-gap clause: why the existing proof machinery did not catch this |
74
+ | `root_correction` | `Fix`, qualified: the correction goes at the owning boundary, not the symptom site |
75
+ | redundant machinery | `machinery_to_remove` (above) |
76
+
77
+ Anything that needs a sixth field extends this section rather than starting a
78
+ parallel format.
79
+
80
+ ### Consequence Ordering
81
+
82
+ Findings are presented **highest-consequence first**. Consequence is determined
83
+ by severity and blast radius — how much of the system, how many users, and how
84
+ irreversible the outcome — not by discovery order, file order, or the order a
85
+ tool happened to emit them in. Two reviewers ordering the same finding set
86
+ differently is a defect, not a preference.
87
+
88
+ This governs the order of findings **within** a section only. Report section
89
+ order stays stable and is unaffected: never reorder, merge, or silently omit a
90
+ section to surface a finding earlier.
91
+
47
92
  ## Dispositions
48
93
 
49
94
  The implementer resolves each finding with exactly one disposition:
@@ -12,7 +12,12 @@ Review exists to get correct work merged, not to keep a PR in review orbit.
12
12
  are non-blocking unless the work item or repository rules make them release
13
13
  criteria.
14
14
  - Every finding must state severity, blocking yes/no, a concrete failure
15
- scenario, evidence, and the smallest actionable fix.
15
+ scenario, evidence, and the smallest actionable fix — plus
16
+ `invariant_violated` (the property at risk) and `machinery_to_remove` (what
17
+ becomes deletable, or `none`), required for `readiness-rubric` findings and
18
+ recommended elsewhere.
19
+ - Present findings highest-consequence first, by severity and blast radius, not
20
+ by discovery order. Report section order stays stable.
16
21
  - A blocking finding without a concrete failure scenario is malformed by
17
22
  contract; downgrade it to non-blocking and ask for evidence.
18
23
  - Resolve each finding as `fixed`, `deferred`, or `pushed-back`. If the reviewer
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-expo",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Expo/React Native-specific skills, agents, rules, and MCP servers",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-expo",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Expo and React Native-specific skills, agents, rules, and MCP servers.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-expo",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Expo/React Native-specific skills, agents, rules, and MCP servers",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-expo",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Expo/React Native-specific skills, agents, rules, and MCP servers",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-expo",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Expo/React Native-specific skills, agents, rules, and MCP servers",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-harper-fabric",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Harper/Fabric-specific rules for TypeScript component apps",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-harper-fabric",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Harper/Fabric-specific Lisa rules for TypeScript component apps.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-harper-fabric",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Harper/Fabric-specific rules for TypeScript component apps",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-harper-fabric",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Harper/Fabric-specific rules for TypeScript component apps",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-harper-fabric",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Harper/Fabric-specific rules for TypeScript component apps",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-nestjs",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "NestJS-specific skills (GraphQL, TypeORM) and hooks (migration write-protection)",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-nestjs",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "NestJS-specific skills and migration write-protection hooks.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-nestjs",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "NestJS-specific skills (GraphQL, TypeORM) and hooks (migration write-protection)",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-nestjs",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "NestJS-specific skills (GraphQL, TypeORM) and hooks (migration write-protection)",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-nestjs",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "NestJS-specific skills (GraphQL, TypeORM) and hooks (migration write-protection)",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-openclaw",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-openclaw",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, across Claude and Codex.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-openclaw",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-openclaw",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-openclaw",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-phaser",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Phaser 4 game-development rules for TypeScript projects",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-phaser",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Phaser 4 game-development rules for TypeScript projects",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-phaser",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Phaser 4 game-development rules for TypeScript projects",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-phaser",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Phaser 4 game-development rules for TypeScript projects",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-phaser",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Phaser 4 game-development rules for TypeScript projects",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-rails",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Ruby on Rails-specific hooks — RuboCop linting/formatting and ast-grep scanning on edit",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-rails",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Ruby on Rails-specific skills and hooks for RuboCop and ast-grep scanning on edit.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-rails",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Ruby on Rails-specific hooks — RuboCop linting/formatting and ast-grep scanning on edit",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-rails",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Ruby on Rails-specific hooks — RuboCop linting/formatting and ast-grep scanning on edit",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-rails",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "Ruby on Rails-specific hooks — RuboCop linting/formatting and ast-grep scanning on edit",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-typescript",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "TypeScript-specific hooks — Prettier formatting, ESLint linting, ast-grep scanning, and error-suppression blocking on edit",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-typescript",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "TypeScript-specific hooks for formatting, linting, and ast-grep scanning on edit.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-typescript",
3
- "version": "2.268.1",
3
+ "version": "2.269.0",
4
4
  "description": "TypeScript-specific hooks — Prettier formatting, ESLint linting, ast-grep scanning, and error-suppression blocking on edit",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"