@codyswann/lisa 2.243.0 → 2.244.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/skills/lisa-implement/SKILL.md +6 -1
- package/plugins/lisa/rules/reference/intent-routing.md +2 -0
- package/plugins/lisa/rules/reference/project-learnings.md +13 -0
- package/plugins/lisa/skills/lisa-implement/SKILL.md +6 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-agy/skills/lisa-implement/SKILL.md +6 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cdk-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/rules/reference/intent-routing.md +2 -0
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/rules/reference/project-learnings.md +13 -0
- package/plugins/lisa-copilot/skills/lisa-implement/SKILL.md +6 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/rules/intent-routing-reference.mdc +2 -0
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/rules/project-learnings-reference.mdc +13 -0
- package/plugins/lisa-cursor/skills/lisa-implement/SKILL.md +6 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-expo-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-nestjs-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-openclaw-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-phaser-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-rails-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-typescript-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-agy/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-copilot/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/lisa-wiki-cursor/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/plugins/src/base/rules/reference/intent-routing.md +2 -0
- package/plugins/src/base/rules/reference/project-learnings.md +13 -0
- package/plugins/src/base/skills/lisa-implement/SKILL.md +6 -1
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
|
|
|
102
102
|
"form-data": ">=4.0.6"
|
|
103
103
|
},
|
|
104
104
|
"name": "@codyswann/lisa",
|
|
105
|
-
"version": "2.
|
|
105
|
+
"version": "2.244.0",
|
|
106
106
|
"description": "Claude Code governance framework that applies guardrails, guidance, and automated enforcement to projects",
|
|
107
107
|
"main": "dist/index.js",
|
|
108
108
|
"exports": {
|
|
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
161
161
|
"relevant_documentation": "",
|
|
162
162
|
"testing_requirements": ["..."],
|
|
163
163
|
"skills": ["..."],
|
|
164
|
-
"learnings": ["
|
|
164
|
+
"learnings": [{ "kind": "mistake", "note": "one line", "evidence": "optional ref" }],
|
|
165
165
|
"required_access": [
|
|
166
166
|
{ "tool": "<external tool/system this task or its verification needs>", "probe": "<the read-only command or *-access check that proves access>", "status": "pass|fail" }
|
|
167
167
|
],
|
|
@@ -173,11 +173,16 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
173
173
|
}
|
|
174
174
|
```
|
|
175
175
|
|
|
176
|
+
The `learnings` array is task-end MLD telemetry (Mistakes / Learnings / Desires) — a low-trust self-report for the harness builder, never instructions for a later agent. Each entry is either a plain string (treated as kind `learning` for backward compatibility with older flows) or an object, exactly like the example entry in the block above: a `kind` of `mistake`, `learning`, or `desire`; a one-line `note`; and an optional `evidence` pointer. A `mistake` is an error in the agent's own trajectory, a `learning` is an environment fact discovered the hard way, a `desire` is context or tooling the agent wished it had. Keep each to one line — no essays. `mistake`/`learning` entries are ledger candidates; `desire` entries are tooling-gap candidates that the learner (#1731) records for the gardener's human-gated tooling-gap lane.
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
176
178
|
Before any task is implemented, the agent team must explore the codebase for relevant research (documentation, code, git history, etc) and update each task's `metadata.relevant_documentation` with the findings.
|
|
177
179
|
|
|
178
180
|
For Fix tasks and user-visible Build tasks, `testing_requirements` must include the highest-practical-observation regression requirement above, including the selected harness or the recorded absence/blocker path. The completion condition must include the proof command and the required CI execution evidence for the new spec.
|
|
179
181
|
|
|
180
182
|
Each task must be reviewed by the team to make sure their verification passes.
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
Before marking a task complete, the implementing agent records concise MLD into `metadata.learnings` — mistakes (errors in its own trajectory), learnings (environment facts it discovered the hard way), and desires (context or tools it wished it had). Empty (`learnings: []`) is a valid result: never re-prompt for content, and never grade or score self-reports — a scored MLD would reward plausible self-commentary over good outcomes.
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
181
186
|
Each task must have their learnings reviewed by the learner subagent.
|
|
182
187
|
|
|
183
188
|
Before shutting down the team, execute the Verify flow:
|
|
@@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ Determine the work type and execute the matching variant:
|
|
|
166
166
|
3. Recommend next action (Research, Plan, Implement, or escalate)
|
|
167
167
|
4. `learner` -- capture discoveries
|
|
168
168
|
|
|
169
|
+
In every work type above, before a task completes -- immediately ahead of the closing `learner` step -- the implementing agent records concise kind-tagged MLD (Mistakes / Learnings / Desires) into that task's `metadata.learnings`: one line per item, empty is valid, never re-prompted or scored. See the `lisa-implement` skill for the full `{ kind, note, evidence? }` schema and routing (change the schema there, not here).
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
169
171
|
Output: Code passing all quality gates + local empirical verification + codified regression test for each verification (except for spikes, which produce findings only, and non-behavioral verification types — PR / Documentation / Deploy — which carry their own proof).
|
|
170
172
|
|
|
171
173
|
### Verify
|
|
@@ -57,6 +57,19 @@ Precedence:
|
|
|
57
57
|
3. Project learnings add recent operational knowledge, but never rewrite or
|
|
58
58
|
append to `PROJECT_RULES.md`.
|
|
59
59
|
|
|
60
|
+
## Task telemetry (MLD) is not context
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
Raw task-end MLD telemetry — the Mistakes / Learnings / Desires an implementing
|
|
63
|
+
agent records into `metadata.learnings`, and the raw yield of debrief mining — is
|
|
64
|
+
rung-1 capture only: it is never read into a later session's instruction surface,
|
|
65
|
+
never required of an agent (empty is valid), and never graded or scored. It reaches
|
|
66
|
+
a durable surface only indirectly — through the learner's validation into the
|
|
67
|
+
ledger (which sessions still consume solely as the bounded projection above), and
|
|
68
|
+
from there through the gardener's ticket-gated promotion a human approved. Injecting
|
|
69
|
+
raw self-reports, or treating their volume as a quality signal, would reward
|
|
70
|
+
plausible commentary over good outcomes and bypass the very budget and validation
|
|
71
|
+
this contract exists to enforce.
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
60
73
|
Antigravity note: agy does not receive the plugin `rules/` tree. Lisa reconciles
|
|
61
74
|
a bounded `AGENTS.md` bridge that points agy at this same file without copying
|
|
62
75
|
learning bodies or restoring the retired full rules bake.
|
|
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
161
161
|
"relevant_documentation": "",
|
|
162
162
|
"testing_requirements": ["..."],
|
|
163
163
|
"skills": ["..."],
|
|
164
|
-
"learnings": ["
|
|
164
|
+
"learnings": [{ "kind": "mistake", "note": "one line", "evidence": "optional ref" }],
|
|
165
165
|
"required_access": [
|
|
166
166
|
{ "tool": "<external tool/system this task or its verification needs>", "probe": "<the read-only command or *-access check that proves access>", "status": "pass|fail" }
|
|
167
167
|
],
|
|
@@ -173,11 +173,16 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
173
173
|
}
|
|
174
174
|
```
|
|
175
175
|
|
|
176
|
+
The `learnings` array is task-end MLD telemetry (Mistakes / Learnings / Desires) — a low-trust self-report for the harness builder, never instructions for a later agent. Each entry is either a plain string (treated as kind `learning` for backward compatibility with older flows) or an object, exactly like the example entry in the block above: a `kind` of `mistake`, `learning`, or `desire`; a one-line `note`; and an optional `evidence` pointer. A `mistake` is an error in the agent's own trajectory, a `learning` is an environment fact discovered the hard way, a `desire` is context or tooling the agent wished it had. Keep each to one line — no essays. `mistake`/`learning` entries are ledger candidates; `desire` entries are tooling-gap candidates that the learner (#1731) records for the gardener's human-gated tooling-gap lane.
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
176
178
|
Before any task is implemented, the agent team must explore the codebase for relevant research (documentation, code, git history, etc) and update each task's `metadata.relevant_documentation` with the findings.
|
|
177
179
|
|
|
178
180
|
For Fix tasks and user-visible Build tasks, `testing_requirements` must include the highest-practical-observation regression requirement above, including the selected harness or the recorded absence/blocker path. The completion condition must include the proof command and the required CI execution evidence for the new spec.
|
|
179
181
|
|
|
180
182
|
Each task must be reviewed by the team to make sure their verification passes.
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
Before marking a task complete, the implementing agent records concise MLD into `metadata.learnings` — mistakes (errors in its own trajectory), learnings (environment facts it discovered the hard way), and desires (context or tools it wished it had). Empty (`learnings: []`) is a valid result: never re-prompt for content, and never grade or score self-reports — a scored MLD would reward plausible self-commentary over good outcomes.
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
181
186
|
Each task must have their learnings reviewed by the learner subagent.
|
|
182
187
|
|
|
183
188
|
Before shutting down the team, execute the Verify flow:
|
|
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
161
161
|
"relevant_documentation": "",
|
|
162
162
|
"testing_requirements": ["..."],
|
|
163
163
|
"skills": ["..."],
|
|
164
|
-
"learnings": ["
|
|
164
|
+
"learnings": [{ "kind": "mistake", "note": "one line", "evidence": "optional ref" }],
|
|
165
165
|
"required_access": [
|
|
166
166
|
{ "tool": "<external tool/system this task or its verification needs>", "probe": "<the read-only command or *-access check that proves access>", "status": "pass|fail" }
|
|
167
167
|
],
|
|
@@ -173,11 +173,16 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
173
173
|
}
|
|
174
174
|
```
|
|
175
175
|
|
|
176
|
+
The `learnings` array is task-end MLD telemetry (Mistakes / Learnings / Desires) — a low-trust self-report for the harness builder, never instructions for a later agent. Each entry is either a plain string (treated as kind `learning` for backward compatibility with older flows) or an object, exactly like the example entry in the block above: a `kind` of `mistake`, `learning`, or `desire`; a one-line `note`; and an optional `evidence` pointer. A `mistake` is an error in the agent's own trajectory, a `learning` is an environment fact discovered the hard way, a `desire` is context or tooling the agent wished it had. Keep each to one line — no essays. `mistake`/`learning` entries are ledger candidates; `desire` entries are tooling-gap candidates that the learner (#1731) records for the gardener's human-gated tooling-gap lane.
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
176
178
|
Before any task is implemented, the agent team must explore the codebase for relevant research (documentation, code, git history, etc) and update each task's `metadata.relevant_documentation` with the findings.
|
|
177
179
|
|
|
178
180
|
For Fix tasks and user-visible Build tasks, `testing_requirements` must include the highest-practical-observation regression requirement above, including the selected harness or the recorded absence/blocker path. The completion condition must include the proof command and the required CI execution evidence for the new spec.
|
|
179
181
|
|
|
180
182
|
Each task must be reviewed by the team to make sure their verification passes.
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
Before marking a task complete, the implementing agent records concise MLD into `metadata.learnings` — mistakes (errors in its own trajectory), learnings (environment facts it discovered the hard way), and desires (context or tools it wished it had). Empty (`learnings: []`) is a valid result: never re-prompt for content, and never grade or score self-reports — a scored MLD would reward plausible self-commentary over good outcomes.
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
181
186
|
Each task must have their learnings reviewed by the learner subagent.
|
|
182
187
|
|
|
183
188
|
Before shutting down the team, execute the Verify flow:
|
|
@@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ Determine the work type and execute the matching variant:
|
|
|
166
166
|
3. Recommend next action (Research, Plan, Implement, or escalate)
|
|
167
167
|
4. `learner` -- capture discoveries
|
|
168
168
|
|
|
169
|
+
In every work type above, before a task completes -- immediately ahead of the closing `learner` step -- the implementing agent records concise kind-tagged MLD (Mistakes / Learnings / Desires) into that task's `metadata.learnings`: one line per item, empty is valid, never re-prompted or scored. See the `lisa-implement` skill for the full `{ kind, note, evidence? }` schema and routing (change the schema there, not here).
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
169
171
|
Output: Code passing all quality gates + local empirical verification + codified regression test for each verification (except for spikes, which produce findings only, and non-behavioral verification types — PR / Documentation / Deploy — which carry their own proof).
|
|
170
172
|
|
|
171
173
|
### Verify
|
|
@@ -57,6 +57,19 @@ Precedence:
|
|
|
57
57
|
3. Project learnings add recent operational knowledge, but never rewrite or
|
|
58
58
|
append to `PROJECT_RULES.md`.
|
|
59
59
|
|
|
60
|
+
## Task telemetry (MLD) is not context
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
Raw task-end MLD telemetry — the Mistakes / Learnings / Desires an implementing
|
|
63
|
+
agent records into `metadata.learnings`, and the raw yield of debrief mining — is
|
|
64
|
+
rung-1 capture only: it is never read into a later session's instruction surface,
|
|
65
|
+
never required of an agent (empty is valid), and never graded or scored. It reaches
|
|
66
|
+
a durable surface only indirectly — through the learner's validation into the
|
|
67
|
+
ledger (which sessions still consume solely as the bounded projection above), and
|
|
68
|
+
from there through the gardener's ticket-gated promotion a human approved. Injecting
|
|
69
|
+
raw self-reports, or treating their volume as a quality signal, would reward
|
|
70
|
+
plausible commentary over good outcomes and bypass the very budget and validation
|
|
71
|
+
this contract exists to enforce.
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
60
73
|
Antigravity note: agy does not receive the plugin `rules/` tree. Lisa reconciles
|
|
61
74
|
a bounded `AGENTS.md` bridge that points agy at this same file without copying
|
|
62
75
|
learning bodies or restoring the retired full rules bake.
|
|
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
161
161
|
"relevant_documentation": "",
|
|
162
162
|
"testing_requirements": ["..."],
|
|
163
163
|
"skills": ["..."],
|
|
164
|
-
"learnings": ["
|
|
164
|
+
"learnings": [{ "kind": "mistake", "note": "one line", "evidence": "optional ref" }],
|
|
165
165
|
"required_access": [
|
|
166
166
|
{ "tool": "<external tool/system this task or its verification needs>", "probe": "<the read-only command or *-access check that proves access>", "status": "pass|fail" }
|
|
167
167
|
],
|
|
@@ -173,11 +173,16 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
173
173
|
}
|
|
174
174
|
```
|
|
175
175
|
|
|
176
|
+
The `learnings` array is task-end MLD telemetry (Mistakes / Learnings / Desires) — a low-trust self-report for the harness builder, never instructions for a later agent. Each entry is either a plain string (treated as kind `learning` for backward compatibility with older flows) or an object, exactly like the example entry in the block above: a `kind` of `mistake`, `learning`, or `desire`; a one-line `note`; and an optional `evidence` pointer. A `mistake` is an error in the agent's own trajectory, a `learning` is an environment fact discovered the hard way, a `desire` is context or tooling the agent wished it had. Keep each to one line — no essays. `mistake`/`learning` entries are ledger candidates; `desire` entries are tooling-gap candidates that the learner (#1731) records for the gardener's human-gated tooling-gap lane.
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
176
178
|
Before any task is implemented, the agent team must explore the codebase for relevant research (documentation, code, git history, etc) and update each task's `metadata.relevant_documentation` with the findings.
|
|
177
179
|
|
|
178
180
|
For Fix tasks and user-visible Build tasks, `testing_requirements` must include the highest-practical-observation regression requirement above, including the selected harness or the recorded absence/blocker path. The completion condition must include the proof command and the required CI execution evidence for the new spec.
|
|
179
181
|
|
|
180
182
|
Each task must be reviewed by the team to make sure their verification passes.
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
Before marking a task complete, the implementing agent records concise MLD into `metadata.learnings` — mistakes (errors in its own trajectory), learnings (environment facts it discovered the hard way), and desires (context or tools it wished it had). Empty (`learnings: []`) is a valid result: never re-prompt for content, and never grade or score self-reports — a scored MLD would reward plausible self-commentary over good outcomes.
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
181
186
|
Each task must have their learnings reviewed by the learner subagent.
|
|
182
187
|
|
|
183
188
|
Before shutting down the team, execute the Verify flow:
|
|
@@ -171,6 +171,8 @@ Determine the work type and execute the matching variant:
|
|
|
171
171
|
3. Recommend next action (Research, Plan, Implement, or escalate)
|
|
172
172
|
4. `learner` -- capture discoveries
|
|
173
173
|
|
|
174
|
+
In every work type above, before a task completes -- immediately ahead of the closing `learner` step -- the implementing agent records concise kind-tagged MLD (Mistakes / Learnings / Desires) into that task's `metadata.learnings`: one line per item, empty is valid, never re-prompted or scored. See the `lisa-implement` skill for the full `{ kind, note, evidence? }` schema and routing (change the schema there, not here).
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
174
176
|
Output: Code passing all quality gates + local empirical verification + codified regression test for each verification (except for spikes, which produce findings only, and non-behavioral verification types — PR / Documentation / Deploy — which carry their own proof).
|
|
175
177
|
|
|
176
178
|
### Verify
|
|
@@ -62,6 +62,19 @@ Precedence:
|
|
|
62
62
|
3. Project learnings add recent operational knowledge, but never rewrite or
|
|
63
63
|
append to `PROJECT_RULES.md`.
|
|
64
64
|
|
|
65
|
+
## Task telemetry (MLD) is not context
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
Raw task-end MLD telemetry — the Mistakes / Learnings / Desires an implementing
|
|
68
|
+
agent records into `metadata.learnings`, and the raw yield of debrief mining — is
|
|
69
|
+
rung-1 capture only: it is never read into a later session's instruction surface,
|
|
70
|
+
never required of an agent (empty is valid), and never graded or scored. It reaches
|
|
71
|
+
a durable surface only indirectly — through the learner's validation into the
|
|
72
|
+
ledger (which sessions still consume solely as the bounded projection above), and
|
|
73
|
+
from there through the gardener's ticket-gated promotion a human approved. Injecting
|
|
74
|
+
raw self-reports, or treating their volume as a quality signal, would reward
|
|
75
|
+
plausible commentary over good outcomes and bypass the very budget and validation
|
|
76
|
+
this contract exists to enforce.
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
65
78
|
Antigravity note: agy does not receive the plugin `rules/` tree. Lisa reconciles
|
|
66
79
|
a bounded `AGENTS.md` bridge that points agy at this same file without copying
|
|
67
80
|
learning bodies or restoring the retired full rules bake.
|
|
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
161
161
|
"relevant_documentation": "",
|
|
162
162
|
"testing_requirements": ["..."],
|
|
163
163
|
"skills": ["..."],
|
|
164
|
-
"learnings": ["
|
|
164
|
+
"learnings": [{ "kind": "mistake", "note": "one line", "evidence": "optional ref" }],
|
|
165
165
|
"required_access": [
|
|
166
166
|
{ "tool": "<external tool/system this task or its verification needs>", "probe": "<the read-only command or *-access check that proves access>", "status": "pass|fail" }
|
|
167
167
|
],
|
|
@@ -173,11 +173,16 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
173
173
|
}
|
|
174
174
|
```
|
|
175
175
|
|
|
176
|
+
The `learnings` array is task-end MLD telemetry (Mistakes / Learnings / Desires) — a low-trust self-report for the harness builder, never instructions for a later agent. Each entry is either a plain string (treated as kind `learning` for backward compatibility with older flows) or an object, exactly like the example entry in the block above: a `kind` of `mistake`, `learning`, or `desire`; a one-line `note`; and an optional `evidence` pointer. A `mistake` is an error in the agent's own trajectory, a `learning` is an environment fact discovered the hard way, a `desire` is context or tooling the agent wished it had. Keep each to one line — no essays. `mistake`/`learning` entries are ledger candidates; `desire` entries are tooling-gap candidates that the learner (#1731) records for the gardener's human-gated tooling-gap lane.
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
176
178
|
Before any task is implemented, the agent team must explore the codebase for relevant research (documentation, code, git history, etc) and update each task's `metadata.relevant_documentation` with the findings.
|
|
177
179
|
|
|
178
180
|
For Fix tasks and user-visible Build tasks, `testing_requirements` must include the highest-practical-observation regression requirement above, including the selected harness or the recorded absence/blocker path. The completion condition must include the proof command and the required CI execution evidence for the new spec.
|
|
179
181
|
|
|
180
182
|
Each task must be reviewed by the team to make sure their verification passes.
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
Before marking a task complete, the implementing agent records concise MLD into `metadata.learnings` — mistakes (errors in its own trajectory), learnings (environment facts it discovered the hard way), and desires (context or tools it wished it had). Empty (`learnings: []`) is a valid result: never re-prompt for content, and never grade or score self-reports — a scored MLD would reward plausible self-commentary over good outcomes.
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
181
186
|
Each task must have their learnings reviewed by the learner subagent.
|
|
182
187
|
|
|
183
188
|
Before shutting down the team, execute the Verify flow:
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.244.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.244.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, across Claude and Codex.",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.244.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.244.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "lisa-openclaw",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.244.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Connect staff roles to Telegram or Slack via OpenClaw — facilitator/specialist hub-and-spoke routing and repo-coding topics, for Claude Code and Codex",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "Cody Swann"
|
|
@@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ Determine the work type and execute the matching variant:
|
|
|
166
166
|
3. Recommend next action (Research, Plan, Implement, or escalate)
|
|
167
167
|
4. `learner` -- capture discoveries
|
|
168
168
|
|
|
169
|
+
In every work type above, before a task completes -- immediately ahead of the closing `learner` step -- the implementing agent records concise kind-tagged MLD (Mistakes / Learnings / Desires) into that task's `metadata.learnings`: one line per item, empty is valid, never re-prompted or scored. See the `lisa-implement` skill for the full `{ kind, note, evidence? }` schema and routing (change the schema there, not here).
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
169
171
|
Output: Code passing all quality gates + local empirical verification + codified regression test for each verification (except for spikes, which produce findings only, and non-behavioral verification types — PR / Documentation / Deploy — which carry their own proof).
|
|
170
172
|
|
|
171
173
|
### Verify
|
|
@@ -57,6 +57,19 @@ Precedence:
|
|
|
57
57
|
3. Project learnings add recent operational knowledge, but never rewrite or
|
|
58
58
|
append to `PROJECT_RULES.md`.
|
|
59
59
|
|
|
60
|
+
## Task telemetry (MLD) is not context
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
Raw task-end MLD telemetry — the Mistakes / Learnings / Desires an implementing
|
|
63
|
+
agent records into `metadata.learnings`, and the raw yield of debrief mining — is
|
|
64
|
+
rung-1 capture only: it is never read into a later session's instruction surface,
|
|
65
|
+
never required of an agent (empty is valid), and never graded or scored. It reaches
|
|
66
|
+
a durable surface only indirectly — through the learner's validation into the
|
|
67
|
+
ledger (which sessions still consume solely as the bounded projection above), and
|
|
68
|
+
from there through the gardener's ticket-gated promotion a human approved. Injecting
|
|
69
|
+
raw self-reports, or treating their volume as a quality signal, would reward
|
|
70
|
+
plausible commentary over good outcomes and bypass the very budget and validation
|
|
71
|
+
this contract exists to enforce.
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
60
73
|
Antigravity note: agy does not receive the plugin `rules/` tree. Lisa reconciles
|
|
61
74
|
a bounded `AGENTS.md` bridge that points agy at this same file without copying
|
|
62
75
|
learning bodies or restoring the retired full rules bake.
|
|
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
161
161
|
"relevant_documentation": "",
|
|
162
162
|
"testing_requirements": ["..."],
|
|
163
163
|
"skills": ["..."],
|
|
164
|
-
"learnings": ["
|
|
164
|
+
"learnings": [{ "kind": "mistake", "note": "one line", "evidence": "optional ref" }],
|
|
165
165
|
"required_access": [
|
|
166
166
|
{ "tool": "<external tool/system this task or its verification needs>", "probe": "<the read-only command or *-access check that proves access>", "status": "pass|fail" }
|
|
167
167
|
],
|
|
@@ -173,11 +173,16 @@ Every task MUST include this JSON metadata block. Do NOT omit `skills` (use `[]`
|
|
|
173
173
|
}
|
|
174
174
|
```
|
|
175
175
|
|
|
176
|
+
The `learnings` array is task-end MLD telemetry (Mistakes / Learnings / Desires) — a low-trust self-report for the harness builder, never instructions for a later agent. Each entry is either a plain string (treated as kind `learning` for backward compatibility with older flows) or an object, exactly like the example entry in the block above: a `kind` of `mistake`, `learning`, or `desire`; a one-line `note`; and an optional `evidence` pointer. A `mistake` is an error in the agent's own trajectory, a `learning` is an environment fact discovered the hard way, a `desire` is context or tooling the agent wished it had. Keep each to one line — no essays. `mistake`/`learning` entries are ledger candidates; `desire` entries are tooling-gap candidates that the learner (#1731) records for the gardener's human-gated tooling-gap lane.
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
176
178
|
Before any task is implemented, the agent team must explore the codebase for relevant research (documentation, code, git history, etc) and update each task's `metadata.relevant_documentation` with the findings.
|
|
177
179
|
|
|
178
180
|
For Fix tasks and user-visible Build tasks, `testing_requirements` must include the highest-practical-observation regression requirement above, including the selected harness or the recorded absence/blocker path. The completion condition must include the proof command and the required CI execution evidence for the new spec.
|
|
179
181
|
|
|
180
182
|
Each task must be reviewed by the team to make sure their verification passes.
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
Before marking a task complete, the implementing agent records concise MLD into `metadata.learnings` — mistakes (errors in its own trajectory), learnings (environment facts it discovered the hard way), and desires (context or tools it wished it had). Empty (`learnings: []`) is a valid result: never re-prompt for content, and never grade or score self-reports — a scored MLD would reward plausible self-commentary over good outcomes.
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
181
186
|
Each task must have their learnings reviewed by the learner subagent.
|
|
182
187
|
|
|
183
188
|
Before shutting down the team, execute the Verify flow:
|