@codyswann/lisa 2.110.1 → 2.111.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (57) hide show
  1. package/package.json +1 -1
  2. package/plugins/lisa/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  3. package/plugins/lisa/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  4. package/plugins/lisa/commands/repair-intake.md +2 -2
  5. package/plugins/lisa/rules/config-resolution.md +2 -2
  6. package/plugins/lisa/skills/repair-intake/SKILL.md +86 -9
  7. package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  8. package/plugins/lisa-cdk/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  9. package/plugins/lisa-expo/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  10. package/plugins/lisa-expo/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  11. package/plugins/lisa-expo/commands/e2e-coverage-gaps.md +7 -0
  12. package/plugins/lisa-expo/commands/exploratory-qa.md +2 -2
  13. package/plugins/lisa-expo/skills/e2e-coverage-gaps/SKILL.md +105 -0
  14. package/plugins/lisa-expo/skills/e2e-coverage-gaps/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  15. package/plugins/lisa-expo/skills/exploratory-qa/SKILL.md +100 -93
  16. package/plugins/lisa-expo/skills/exploratory-qa/agents/openai.yaml +2 -2
  17. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  18. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  19. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/commands/e2e-coverage-gaps.md +7 -0
  20. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/commands/exploratory-qa.md +2 -2
  21. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/skills/e2e-coverage-gaps/SKILL.md +105 -0
  22. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/skills/e2e-coverage-gaps/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  23. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/skills/exploratory-qa/SKILL.md +100 -93
  24. package/plugins/lisa-harper-fabric/skills/exploratory-qa/agents/openai.yaml +2 -2
  25. package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  26. package/plugins/lisa-nestjs/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  27. package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  28. package/plugins/lisa-openclaw/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  29. package/plugins/lisa-rails/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  30. package/plugins/lisa-rails/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  31. package/plugins/lisa-rails/commands/e2e-coverage-gaps.md +7 -0
  32. package/plugins/lisa-rails/commands/exploratory-qa.md +2 -2
  33. package/plugins/lisa-rails/skills/e2e-coverage-gaps/SKILL.md +105 -0
  34. package/plugins/lisa-rails/skills/e2e-coverage-gaps/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  35. package/plugins/lisa-rails/skills/exploratory-qa/SKILL.md +100 -93
  36. package/plugins/lisa-rails/skills/exploratory-qa/agents/openai.yaml +2 -2
  37. package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  38. package/plugins/lisa-typescript/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  39. package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  40. package/plugins/lisa-wiki/.codex-plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
  41. package/plugins/lisa-wiki/templates/llm-wiki-contract.md +12 -0
  42. package/plugins/src/base/commands/repair-intake.md +2 -2
  43. package/plugins/src/base/rules/config-resolution.md +2 -2
  44. package/plugins/src/base/skills/repair-intake/SKILL.md +86 -9
  45. package/plugins/src/expo/commands/e2e-coverage-gaps.md +7 -0
  46. package/plugins/src/expo/commands/exploratory-qa.md +2 -2
  47. package/plugins/src/expo/skills/e2e-coverage-gaps/SKILL.md +105 -0
  48. package/plugins/src/expo/skills/exploratory-qa/SKILL.md +100 -93
  49. package/plugins/src/harper-fabric/commands/e2e-coverage-gaps.md +7 -0
  50. package/plugins/src/harper-fabric/commands/exploratory-qa.md +2 -2
  51. package/plugins/src/harper-fabric/skills/e2e-coverage-gaps/SKILL.md +105 -0
  52. package/plugins/src/harper-fabric/skills/exploratory-qa/SKILL.md +100 -93
  53. package/plugins/src/rails/commands/e2e-coverage-gaps.md +7 -0
  54. package/plugins/src/rails/commands/exploratory-qa.md +2 -2
  55. package/plugins/src/rails/skills/e2e-coverage-gaps/SKILL.md +105 -0
  56. package/plugins/src/rails/skills/exploratory-qa/SKILL.md +100 -93
  57. package/plugins/src/wiki/templates/llm-wiki-contract.md +12 -0
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
82
82
  "lodash": ">=4.18.1"
83
83
  },
84
84
  "name": "@codyswann/lisa",
85
- "version": "2.110.1",
85
+ "version": "2.111.0",
86
86
  "description": "Claude Code governance framework that applies guardrails, guidance, and automated enforcement to projects",
87
87
  "main": "dist/index.js",
88
88
  "exports": {
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa",
3
- "version": "2.110.1",
3
+ "version": "2.111.0",
4
4
  "description": "Universal governance — agents, skills, commands, hooks, and rules for all projects",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa",
3
- "version": "2.110.1",
3
+ "version": "2.111.0",
4
4
  "description": "Universal governance: agents, skills, commands, hooks, and rules for all projects.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  ---
2
- description: "Repair counterpart to /lisa:intake. Vendor-agnostic batch scanner that finds stuck or half-closed work — items left in `blocked`, stalled in an in-progress role (build `claimed`, PRD `in_review`), terminal-labeled items still natively open, and rollups whose children are all terminal — across the same queues /lisa:intake serves (Notion / Confluence / Linear / GitHub PRDs; JIRA / GitHub / Linear build issues). Repairs every materially actionable candidate inside the `max_candidates` cap: resumes stalled in-progress work in place, re-validates blocked PRDs, re-dispatches blocked build items whose blockers have cleared, performs terminal native closure, and closes out completed rollups. Cron-safe and bounded; default GitHub intake_mode is both and default max_candidates is 100."
3
- argument-hint: "<Notion-PRD-database-URL | Confluence-space-URL | Confluence-parent-page-URL | Linear-workspace-URL | Linear-team-URL | GitHub-repo-URL | org/repo | JIRA-project-key | JQL-filter> [intake_mode=prd|build|both] [stale_after=24h] [max_candidates=100] [force=true]"
2
+ description: "Repair counterpart to /lisa:intake. Vendor-agnostic batch scanner that finds stuck or half-closed work — items left in `blocked`, stalled in an in-progress role (build `claimed`, PRD `in_review`), terminal-labeled items still natively open, and rollups whose children are all terminal — across the same queues /lisa:intake serves (Notion / Confluence / Linear / GitHub PRDs; JIRA / GitHub / Linear build issues). Repairs every materially actionable candidate inside the `max_candidates` cap: resumes stalled in-progress work in place — but for a stalled build it first diagnoses the PR/deploy state and, if the PR cannot merge (conflict, rebase, failing checks, unaddressed CodeRabbit/changes-requested) or a deploy failed, files a build-ready fix ticket and moves the item to `blocked` (blocked by it) instead of re-dispatching — re-validates blocked PRDs, re-dispatches blocked build items whose blockers have cleared, performs terminal native closure, and closes out completed rollups. Cron-safe and bounded; default GitHub intake_mode is both and default max_candidates is 100."
3
+ argument-hint: "<Notion-PRD-database-URL | Confluence-space-URL | Confluence-parent-page-URL | Linear-workspace-URL | Linear-team-URL | GitHub-repo-URL | org/repo | JIRA-project-key | JQL-filter> [intake_mode=prd|build|both] [stale_after=2h] [max_candidates=100] [force=true]"
4
4
  ---
5
5
 
6
6
  Use the /lisa:repair-intake skill to scan the queue for stuck or half-closed items and repair every materially actionable candidate inside `max_candidates` (default 100). For GitHub queues, default `intake_mode` to `both` when the caller omits it. $ARGUMENTS
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ fi
147
147
  "intake": {
148
148
  "assignee": "<vendor-user-id-or-login>",
149
149
  "repair": {
150
- "staleAfterHours": 24,
150
+ "staleAfterHours": 2,
151
151
  "maxCandidates": 100
152
152
  }
153
153
  }
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ documented defaults, so existing projects need no config change.
299
299
 
300
300
  | Key | Required | Default | Notes |
301
301
  |-----|----------|---------|-------|
302
- | `intake.repair.staleAfterHours` | no | `24` | How long an in-progress item (build `claimed`, PRD `in_review`) may show no observable activity before repair-intake treats it as stalled and resumes it. `blocked` items are judged on blocker/answer state, not this threshold. Overridable per-run via `stale_after=<dur>` in `$ARGUMENTS` (which always wins). The same value is the default backoff window for loop-prevention notes. |
302
+ | `intake.repair.staleAfterHours` | no | `2` | How long an in-progress item (build `claimed`, PRD `in_review`) may show no observable activity before repair-intake treats it as stalled and resumes it. `blocked` items are judged on blocker/answer state, not this threshold. Overridable per-run via `stale_after=<dur>` in `$ARGUMENTS` (which always wins). The same value is the default backoff window for loop-prevention notes. |
303
303
  | `intake.repair.maxCandidates` | no | `100` | Upper bound on how many stuck items repair-intake enumerates while searching for the first actionable one. Bounds scan cost. Overridable per-run via `max_candidates=<n>`. |
304
304
 
305
305
  ### Intake assignee filter (`intake.assignee`)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  ---
2
2
  name: repair-intake
3
- description: "Vendor-agnostic repair scanner — the recovery counterpart to lisa:intake. Where intake claims `ready` work, repair-intake finds work that got stuck or was left half-closed: items left in `blocked`, stalled in an in-progress role (build `claimed`, PRD `in_review`), terminal-labeled items that are still natively open, and rollup/container items whose children are all terminal but whose parent is not closed out. Scans the same queues lisa:intake serves (Notion / Confluence / Linear / GitHub PRD databases; JIRA / GitHub / Linear build queues), enumerates candidates up to `max_candidates`, and repairs every materially actionable one in that bounded set: resumes stalled in-progress work IN PLACE (build → the vendor agent + the scanner's post-agent transition; PRD → the source `*-to-tracker` dry-run validate→route pipeline), re-validates blocked PRDs when new clarifying answers exist, re-dispatches blocked build items whose `is blocked by` dependencies have since closed, performs terminal native closure for terminal-labeled items, and closes rollups whose associated child work is fully terminal. Idempotent, loop-protected via a [lisa-repair-intake] marker + state fingerprint + backoff. Never mutates product-owned states (`draft`, `verified`) and never touches `ready` items. Designed as a /schedule cron target running alongside lisa:intake."
3
+ description: "Vendor-agnostic repair scanner — the recovery counterpart to lisa:intake. Where intake claims `ready` work, repair-intake finds work that got stuck or was left half-closed: items left in `blocked`, stalled in an in-progress role (build `claimed`, PRD `in_review`), terminal-labeled items that are still natively open, and rollup/container items whose children are all terminal but whose parent is not closed out. Scans the same queues lisa:intake serves (Notion / Confluence / Linear / GitHub PRD databases; JIRA / GitHub / Linear build queues), enumerates candidates up to `max_candidates`, and repairs every materially actionable one in that bounded set: resumes stalled in-progress work IN PLACE (build → the vendor agent + the scanner's post-agent transition; PRD → the source `*-to-tracker` dry-run validate→route pipeline) — but for a stalled build it first diagnoses the PR/deploy state and, if the PR cannot merge (conflict, rebase-required, failing checks, unaddressed CodeRabbit/changes-requested) or a deploy failed, files a build-ready leaf fix ticket and moves the item to `blocked` (blocked by that ticket) rather than re-dispatching, re-validates blocked PRDs when new clarifying answers exist, re-dispatches blocked build items whose `is blocked by` dependencies have since closed, performs terminal native closure for terminal-labeled items, and closes rollups whose associated child work is fully terminal. Idempotent, loop-protected via a [lisa-repair-intake] marker + state fingerprint + backoff. Never mutates product-owned states (`draft`, `verified`) and never touches `ready` items. Designed as a /schedule cron target running alongside lisa:intake."
4
4
  allowed-tools: ["Skill", "Bash", "Read", "Write", "Edit", "mcp__linear-server__list_teams", "mcp__linear-server__list_projects", "mcp__linear-server__get_project", "mcp__linear-server__save_project", "mcp__linear-server__list_project_labels", "mcp__linear-server__list_issues", "mcp__linear-server__get_issue", "mcp__linear-server__save_issue", "mcp__linear-server__list_comments", "mcp__linear-server__save_comment", "mcp__linear-server__list_issue_labels", "mcp__linear-server__create_issue_label"]
5
5
  ---
6
6
 
@@ -14,7 +14,11 @@ close-out** roles and moves work *unstuck* or *fully closed*:
14
14
  `in_review`) whose processing cycle died. It is technically "being worked" but nothing is
15
15
  happening, so it sits ignored forever. (The vendor PRD intakes explicitly leave an errored PRD
16
16
  in `in_review` "for the human to investigate from there" — that orphan is exactly what this
17
- skill recovers.)
17
+ skill recovers.) For a stalled **build**, repair-intake first diagnoses *why* it stalled by
18
+ inspecting its PRs and deploys: if the PR cannot merge (conflict / rebase-required / failing
19
+ checks / unaddressed CodeRabbit or `CHANGES_REQUESTED` review) or a deploy failed, it files a
20
+ build-ready leaf fix ticket and moves the item to `blocked` (blocked by that ticket) instead of
21
+ blindly re-dispatching the agent — which would just churn against an unmergeable PR.
18
22
  - **Recoverable blocked** — an item in `blocked` whose blocker may now be gone: an
19
23
  `is blocked by` dependency has since closed, clarifying questions have been answered, or
20
24
  research/waiting resolves the ambiguity that stopped it.
@@ -35,14 +39,14 @@ lifecycle state with provider-native closure and rollup state.
35
39
  ## Public contract
36
40
 
37
41
  ```text
38
- /lisa:repair-intake <queue> [intake_mode=prd|build|both] [stale_after=24h] [max_candidates=100] [force=true]
42
+ /lisa:repair-intake <queue> [intake_mode=prd|build|both] [stale_after=2h] [max_candidates=100] [force=true]
39
43
  ```
40
44
 
41
45
  | Token | Meaning | Default |
42
46
  |-------|---------|---------|
43
47
  | `<queue>` | Same queue identifier `lisa:intake` accepts (see Source dispatch). Required. | — |
44
48
  | `intake_mode` | `prd` \| `build` \| `both`. Only meaningful for a GitHub `org/repo` (or bare `github`) that hosts both PRD and build label namespaces. `both` is unique to repair — a repair sweep usefully covers both lifecycles in one schedule. Absent → `both` when both namespaces exist, else whichever lifecycle exists. | `both` for dual GitHub queues; otherwise infer |
45
- | `stale_after` | How long with no observable activity before an in-progress item counts as stalled. Accepts `24h`, `90m`, `2d`, or `0` (treat any in-progress item as stalled — manual recovery, also the only way to resume work on a provider that exposes no reliable timestamp). Overrides config. | `24h` |
49
+ | `stale_after` | How long with no observable activity before an in-progress item counts as stalled. Accepts `24h`, `90m`, `2d`, or `0` (treat any in-progress item as stalled — manual recovery, also the only way to resume work on a provider that exposes no reliable timestamp). Overrides config. | `2h` |
46
50
  | `max_candidates` | Cap on how many stuck/close-out candidates to enumerate and evaluate. Repair every materially actionable candidate within this bounded set, then stop. Overrides config. | `100` |
47
51
  | `force` | `true` bypasses the loop-prevention backoff window (so a manual re-run re-attempts items even if their fingerprint is unchanged). It does **not** change the staleness rule — use `stale_after=0` for that. | `false` |
48
52
 
@@ -193,7 +197,7 @@ staleness — their repairability is judged on current blocker/answer state, not
193
197
  1. `$ARGUMENTS` `stale_after=<dur>` (one-off override) — always wins. Parse `Nh` / `Nm` / `Nd` /
194
198
  `0` into hours.
195
199
  2. `.lisa.config.json` `intake.repair.staleAfterHours` (durable project default).
196
- 3. Built-in default: **24 hours**.
200
+ 3. Built-in default: **2 hours**.
197
201
 
198
202
  `stale_after=0` means "treat any in-progress item as stalled" — a manual full-recovery lever,
199
203
  and the only way to resume work on a provider that exposes no reliable activity timestamp.
@@ -214,6 +218,14 @@ If ANY of these is newer than the threshold, the item is **active** → record i
214
218
  skip it (read-only). For build `claimed`, an open PR with recent commits/checks is active. For
215
219
  PRD `in_review`, a recent comment or page edit is active.
216
220
 
221
+ Count only **forward-progress** signals as keep-alive: new commits, a review that was just
222
+ requested or posted, an in-progress/queued check run, a fresh progress comment. A **settled
223
+ blocker state** — a failing/errored check run, `CONFLICTING` mergeability, a `CHANGES_REQUESTED`
224
+ review, an unaddressed CodeRabbit/reviewer change request, or a failed deployment — is NOT
225
+ keep-alive activity: it does not reset the staleness clock. The clock runs from the last genuine
226
+ progress event, so a PR that has been sitting failed/conflicted/awaiting-changes for longer than
227
+ `stale_after` counts as stalled and is diagnosed below.
228
+
217
229
  If a provider cannot expose any reliable timestamp, do **not** auto-resume its in-progress
218
230
  items unless the caller passed `stale_after=0`. (Dependency-cleared `blocked` repair still
219
231
  proceeds — it is judged on blocker state, not time.)
@@ -225,10 +237,22 @@ Apply per candidate. Continue through the ordered list until every candidate ins
225
237
  native close/archive/complete, re-dispatch, or refreshed note), be recorded read-only, or be
226
238
  recorded under Errors. Do not stop after the first write; the cap is the batch boundary.
227
239
 
228
- ### Build `claimed` (stalled in-progress) → resume in place
240
+ ### Build `claimed` (stalled in-progress) → diagnose blocker, else resume in place
241
+
242
+ After the staleness gate passes, **first diagnose why it stalled** by inspecting the item's PRs and
243
+ deploys (see "Stuck-cause diagnosis" below). A stalled build usually stalled for a concrete external
244
+ reason, and re-dispatching the agent at it will not fix a PR that cannot merge or a deploy that
245
+ failed — it just churns.
229
246
 
230
- After the staleness gate passes, run the **same per-item sequence the vendor build-intake runs**,
231
- skipping the claim transition (the item is already `claimed`):
247
+ 0. **Diagnose PR & deploy blockers.** If a real external blocker is found (PR cannot merge — merge
248
+ conflict / rebase-required / failing checks / `CHANGES_REQUESTED` / unaddressed CodeRabbit; or a
249
+ failed deploy), **do not dispatch the agent**. Instead file a build-ready leaf fix ticket for the
250
+ blocker, move this item `claimed → blocked` with an `is blocked by` link to that ticket, and
251
+ record it. The existing "Build `blocked` → unblock if cleared" path resumes this item on a later
252
+ cycle once the fix ticket is terminal — a self-healing loop. Skip the resume steps below.
253
+
254
+ If no external blocker is found, the work simply died mid-flight — run the **same per-item sequence
255
+ the vendor build-intake runs**, skipping the claim transition (the item is already `claimed`):
232
256
 
233
257
  1. Dispatch the item to the vendor agent — `lisa:jira-agent` / `lisa:github-agent` /
234
258
  `lisa:linear-agent` (matching the queue's tracker) — with the item ref. This resumes the work
@@ -246,6 +270,59 @@ skipping the claim transition (the item is already `claimed`):
246
270
  > partially-built item look freshly human-approved to the next `lisa:intake` claim, and forces a
247
271
  > two-cycle recovery. Resume in place.
248
272
 
273
+ #### Stuck-cause diagnosis: PR & deploy blockers
274
+
275
+ Run this for every stalled `claimed` build item **before** considering an agent re-dispatch. The
276
+ goal is to distinguish "work died mid-flight, just resume it" from "work is blocked on a concrete
277
+ external state that resuming the agent cannot fix."
278
+
279
+ **1. Find the associated PR(s) and deploy(s).** From the item's linked PRs (GitHub: remote/dev
280
+ links and `gh pr list --search <issue-ref>`; JIRA: dev-status / remote links; Linear: attachments
281
+ and git-branch links) and the deploy(s) for the resulting merge (the env-keyed `deploy.branches`
282
+ mapping from `config-resolution`). Read each PR with the vendor's native state, e.g. GitHub
283
+ `gh pr view <n> --json mergeable,mergeStateStatus,reviewDecision,statusCheckRollup,comments,reviews`.
284
+
285
+ **2. Classify as a blocker.** Treat any of these as a real external blocker:
286
+
287
+ - **Merge conflict / rebase required** — `mergeable = CONFLICTING`, or `mergeStateStatus` in
288
+ `DIRTY` / `BEHIND`.
289
+ - **Failing required checks** — `statusCheckRollup` has a `FAILURE`/`ERROR`/`TIMED_OUT` conclusion,
290
+ or `mergeStateStatus = UNSTABLE`/`BLOCKED` due to checks.
291
+ - **Change requests outstanding** — `reviewDecision = CHANGES_REQUESTED`, or unresolved CodeRabbit
292
+ (or other reviewer) comments that request changes and have not been addressed by a newer commit.
293
+ - **Branch-protection / approvals blocked** — `mergeStateStatus = BLOCKED` for a reason other than
294
+ a transient check still running.
295
+ - **Failed deploy** — the deployment for the item's merge/branch reports a failed/errored status
296
+ (failed deploy workflow run, failed deployment status, or the project's deploy check is red).
297
+
298
+ A check that is still **queued/in progress**, or a `CLEAN`/`HAS_HOOKS` mergeable PR with no
299
+ outstanding change request, is **not** a blocker — that is normal in-flight state. (Such a PR with
300
+ recent check/commit activity would already have been caught as `active` by the staleness gate.)
301
+
302
+ **3. On a blocker found → file a leaf fix ticket + block the item.**
303
+
304
+ 1. **File one build-ready leaf fix ticket** per distinct blocker via `lisa:tracker-write` (the
305
+ vendor-neutral leaf writer + validation gate; never a vendor `*-write-*` skill directly),
306
+ `issue_type: Bug` for a failing-check/conflict/failed-deploy, `Task` for review-feedback
307
+ follow-up, `build_ready: true` so it auto-builds. The ticket MUST name: the blocked item + its
308
+ PR/deploy URL, the exact blocker (conflict / which checks failed with their logs link / which
309
+ change requests / which deploy run), three-audience description, and Gherkin acceptance criteria
310
+ for "PR is mergeable / deploy is green."
311
+ 2. **Transition the stalled item `claimed → blocked`** and add an **`is blocked by`** link to the
312
+ new fix ticket (vendor-native: JIRA issue link `is blocked by`; GitHub/Linear `Blocked by:` line
313
+ + label). Post a `[lisa-repair-intake]` note naming what it is blocked by and why.
314
+ 3. **Record it** as a repair write. Do **not** dispatch the vendor agent for this item this cycle.
315
+
316
+ The item now sits in `blocked`; once the fix ticket reaches a terminal state, the **Build
317
+ `blocked` → unblock if cleared** path (next section) detects the cleared `is blocked by`
318
+ dependency and resumes the original in place — a self-healing loop.
319
+
320
+ **Idempotency.** Before filing, check for an **open** fix ticket already carrying the marker
321
+ `[lisa-repair-intake] blocker:<item-ref>/<blocker-key>` (blocker-key is a stable slug of the
322
+ blocker, e.g. `pr-1234/merge-conflict` or `pr-1234/checks-failing`). If one exists, reference it
323
+ and ensure the `is blocked by` link is present rather than creating a duplicate. Honor the backoff
324
+ window and state fingerprint (Loop prevention) so re-runs over the same unchanged blocker are no-ops.
325
+
249
326
  ### Build `blocked` → re-evaluate, unblock if cleared
250
327
 
251
328
  1. Read the block reason and dependencies (see Dependency clearing).
@@ -399,7 +476,7 @@ cron tick.
399
476
  - Before writing a note or re-attempting a `blocked` item, compute the current fingerprint. If
400
477
  an identical fingerprint was already posted within the **backoff window**, skip the item
401
478
  silently (record as `still_blocked` / `active`, no write).
402
- - Backoff window default = `stale_after` (24h). `force=true` bypasses backoff for a manual run.
479
+ - Backoff window default = `stale_after` (2h). `force=true` bypasses backoff for a manual run.
403
480
  - A *changed* fingerprint (new blocker state, new answers, new verdict) always warrants a fresh
404
481
  note + re-attempt — backoff suppresses only no-op repeats.
405
482
 
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-cdk",
3
- "version": "2.110.1",
3
+ "version": "2.111.0",
4
4
  "description": "AWS CDK-specific plugin",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-cdk",
3
- "version": "2.110.1",
3
+ "version": "2.111.0",
4
4
  "description": "AWS CDK-specific Lisa plugin.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-expo",
3
- "version": "2.110.1",
3
+ "version": "2.111.0",
4
4
  "description": "Expo/React Native-specific skills, agents, rules, and MCP servers",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "lisa-expo",
3
- "version": "2.110.1",
3
+ "version": "2.111.0",
4
4
  "description": "Expo and React Native-specific skills, agents, rules, and MCP servers.",
5
5
  "author": {
6
6
  "name": "Cody Swann"
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ description: "Explore gaps in the automated Playwright/e2e suite: inventory the app's routes and existing tests, find routes with no coverage or flows tested only on the happy path (missing error, permission, empty, loading, and edge cases), confirm each in the running app, and file one build-ready missing-test ticket per gap via lisa:tracker-write. The optional ready flag (default true) controls build-ready vs backlog. For human usability issues, use exploratory-qa instead."
3
+ allowed-tools: ["Skill"]
4
+ argument-hint: "[target-url | env] [ready=true|false]"
5
+ ---
6
+
7
+ Use the /lisa-expo:e2e-coverage-gaps skill to inventory the app's routes and the existing Playwright suite, find uncovered and happy-path-only paths, confirm each gap in the running app, and file one build-ready missing-test ticket per gap via lisa:tracker-write (build-ready per the ready flag, default true). For human usability/experience findings, use /lisa-expo:exploratory-qa. $ARGUMENTS
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
1
1
  ---
2
- description: "Run a Playwright-backed exploratory QA pass: audit the app like a human, find user-noticeable bugs, usability issues, and gaps in automated test coverage, and file each finding as a tracked work item via lisa:tracker-write. The optional ready flag marks bug/suggestion tickets build-ready (auto-picked-up by lisa:intake) or leaves them in the backlog for human triage (default); missing-test tickets are always build-ready."
2
+ description: "Run a first-time-user exploratory QA walkthrough: experience the app like a brand-new human user, clicking through to find anything confusing, broken, or hard to understand (machine-style labels, slow or unclear loads, cramped or cut-off UI, inconsistent UX, awkward scroll behavior) across all breakpoints, and file each finding (bug or usability issue) as a tracked work item via lisa:tracker-write. The optional ready flag marks tickets build-ready (auto-picked-up by lisa:intake) or leaves them in the backlog for human triage (default). For gaps in the automated Playwright suite, use e2e-coverage-gaps instead."
3
3
  allowed-tools: ["Skill"]
4
4
  argument-hint: "[target-url | env] [ready=true|false]"
5
5
  ---
6
6
 
7
- Use the /lisa-expo:exploratory-qa skill to run a human-style exploratory QA pass informed by the existing Playwright suite, then file every finding (bugs, usability issues, missing Playwright tests) as a tracked work item via lisa:tracker-write — bug/suggestion tickets build-ready or in triage per the ready flag (default: triage), missing-test tickets always build-ready. $ARGUMENTS
7
+ Use the /lisa-expo:exploratory-qa skill to experience the app like a brand-new first-time user landing cold on the home page and clicking through to find anything confusing, broken, or hard to understand across all breakpoints — and file each finding (bugs, usability/clarity issues) as a tracked work item via lisa:tracker-write, build-ready or in triage per the ready flag (default: triage). For automated Playwright coverage gaps, use /lisa-expo:e2e-coverage-gaps. $ARGUMENTS
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: e2e-coverage-gaps
3
+ description: Playwright/e2e coverage-gap explorer that FEEDS THE LIFECYCLE. Use when asked to find paths the automated end-to-end suite does NOT cover — routes with no test at all, or flows that are only happy-path tested (missing error, validation, permission, empty, loading, and edge states). It inventories the app's routes and the existing Playwright tests, explores the running app to confirm each uncovered or under-covered path is real and reachable, and files one build-ready missing-test ticket per gap via lisa:tracker-write. For human usability/experience issues (confusing, cramped, or broken UI), use the exploratory-qa skill instead.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # E2E Coverage Gaps
7
+
8
+ ## Overview
9
+
10
+ Find where the automated end-to-end (Playwright) suite is **blind**: routes with no test at all, and
11
+ flows that only assert the **happy path** while ignoring error, permission, empty, loading, and edge
12
+ cases. Inventory the app's routes and the existing tests, explore the running app to confirm each gap
13
+ is real and reachable, then file each gap as a **build-ready missing-test work item** so it enters the
14
+ Lisa lifecycle.
15
+
16
+ This skill is purely about **automated-coverage gaps**. It does not judge whether the UI is confusing
17
+ or pretty — for human usability findings, use the `exploratory-qa` skill.
18
+
19
+ ## Parameters
20
+
21
+ - **`target-url | env`** (first positional) — the app to inventory and explore.
22
+ - **`ready=true|false`** — build-ready state for the missing-test tickets (**default `true`**). Adding
23
+ missing coverage is safe to queue, so these default to build-ready; pass `ready=false` to leave them
24
+ in the backlog for human triage.
25
+
26
+ ## Core Workflow
27
+
28
+ ### 1. Establish Scope
29
+
30
+ - Identify the target environment, account type, and browser requirement, and read the `ready` flag
31
+ (default `true`).
32
+ - **Confirm the tracker is configured.** Gaps are filed as tickets, so read `tracker` from
33
+ `.lisa.config.json` (local overrides global). If it is unset, stop and report that the tracker must
34
+ be configured (via `/lisa:setup:jira` / `:github` / `:linear`) before gaps can be filed.
35
+
36
+ ### 2. Inventory App Routes
37
+
38
+ - Enumerate every route/screen from the project's routing source — filesystem routes, the router
39
+ config, navigation definitions, or a generated sitemap.
40
+ - For each route capture: its path + params, the auth/role it requires, and the primary user actions
41
+ reachable from it (forms, mutations, filters, flows).
42
+
43
+ ### 3. Inventory Existing Playwright Coverage
44
+
45
+ - Inspect the Playwright config, auth/setup projects, fixtures, constants, selectors, spec directories,
46
+ skipped/TODO/flaky tests, retries, and viewport/device projects.
47
+ - For each spec, record which route(s)/flow(s) it exercises and whether it asserts **behavior** or just
48
+ **presence**.
49
+ - Use existing test helpers/selectors when exploring — they reveal intended flows and stable hooks.
50
+
51
+ ### 4. Compute the Gap Matrix
52
+
53
+ Map routes/flows against existing coverage and classify each gap:
54
+
55
+ - **Uncovered route/flow:** no test touches it at all.
56
+ - **Happy-path-only:** the success case is tested but the non-happy paths are not — missing
57
+ error/validation, permission/denied, empty/zero-state, loading/slow, and boundary/edge scenarios.
58
+ - **Assertion-thin:** a test exists but asserts presence rather than behavior/outcome.
59
+ - **Skipped/TODO/flaky:** coverage exists but is disabled or unreliable.
60
+ - **Breakpoint gap:** a flow is only tested at a single viewport when behavior changes across
61
+ breakpoints.
62
+
63
+ ### 5. Explore to Confirm
64
+
65
+ - Navigate each candidate gap in the running app to confirm it is real, reachable, and worth a test.
66
+ Discard gaps that aren't actually reachable or are intentionally out of scope.
67
+
68
+ ### 6. File One Ticket Per Gap
69
+
70
+ Each confirmed gap becomes a leaf **missing-test** work item created via `lisa:tracker-write` (the
71
+ vendor-neutral writer — it dispatches to the configured tracker and runs the validation gate; never
72
+ call a vendor `*-write-*` skill directly), `issue_type: Task`, **build-ready per the `ready` flag
73
+ (default `true`)**. Pass `build_ready` explicitly on every create. Each ticket MUST specify:
74
+
75
+ - The **route/flow** and the exact **user behavior the test must assert**.
76
+ - **Which scenario is missing** (uncovered vs which non-happy path: error / validation / permission /
77
+ empty / loading / edge / breakpoint).
78
+ - The **stable selector / fixture / flow** to use — concrete and automatable.
79
+ - **Three-audience description** + **Gherkin acceptance criteria** describing the test to add.
80
+
81
+ ### Idempotency — don't spam duplicates
82
+
83
+ Before creating a ticket, search the tracker for an **open** ticket carrying a stable marker
84
+ `[lisa-e2e-coverage-gaps] <gap-key>` in its body (the `<gap-key>` is a stable slug of route + missing
85
+ scenario, e.g. `checkout/payment-declined` or `dashboard/empty-state@mobile`). If one exists, reference
86
+ it instead of duplicating. **Match by the marker, never by title.** A *closed* prior ticket does not
87
+ suppress a genuine new gap.
88
+
89
+ ## Output
90
+
91
+ No report file. Emit a concise in-session summary:
92
+
93
+ - **Route inventory:** count of routes/screens discovered.
94
+ - **Existing coverage:** strengths and thin areas (skipped/flaky, assertion-thin, single-viewport).
95
+ - **Gap matrix:** uncovered vs happy-path-only vs breakpoint gaps.
96
+ - **Tickets filed:** each gap with its created/referenced ticket ref and build-ready state.
97
+
98
+ ## Quality Bar
99
+
100
+ - Distinguish **no coverage** from **happy-path-only** — both are gaps, but the ticket must say which.
101
+ - Every ticket must stand alone for an implementer who was not in the session and must be concretely
102
+ automatable (named route, behavior, and stable hook).
103
+ - Do not refile gaps already covered or already ticketed (marker check).
104
+ - This skill is about automated coverage only — route human usability issues to `exploratory-qa`.
105
+ - Preserve unrelated repo changes.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ display_name: "E2e Coverage Gaps"
2
+ short_description: "Playwright/e2e coverage-gap explorer that FEEDS THE LIFECYCLE"
3
+ default_prompt:
4
+ - "Use $e2e-coverage-gaps: Playwright/e2e coverage-gap explorer that FEEDS THE LIFECYCLE."