@codeyam/codeyam-cli 0.1.0-staging.2a88920 → 0.1.0-staging.4813bf3

package/codeyam-cli/templates/codeyam:memory.md

@@ -1,341 +0,0 @@
----
-name: codeyam:memory
-autoApprove: true
-description: |
-  Generate and maintain Claude Rules for your codebase based on thorough analysis.
-  Use when: User wants to set up memory, claude rules, document confusing areas, 
-  or ensure Claude has proper context for working in the codebase.
----
-
-# CodeYam Memory Assistant
-
-This skill helps you generate and maintain Claude Rules (`.claude/rules/`) that provide context-specific guidance. The goal is robust coverage of anything confusing while avoiding documentation of things Claude can intuit.
-
-## When to Use This Skill
-
-- Initial setup: User asks to "set up memory" or "generate claude rules"
-- Maintenance: After completing complex work where lessons should be preserved
-- Review: Periodically to ensure rules are accurate and up-to-date
-
----
-
-## Phase 1: Setup (First Run Only)
-
-Check if this is the first time running memory.
-
-### 1A. Add Documentation Section to CLAUDE.md
-
-If CLAUDE.md doesn't contain a "When Confused / With Mistakes" section, add close to the top:
-
-```markdown
-## When Confused / With Mistakes: Stop. Ask. Document.
-
-- If you are not sure about something stop and ask about it.
-- If you attempt something and it goes wrong then you are confused. Stop and ask about it.
-- If the user is unable to help. Do your best to research.
-- Then document the findings!
-
-### Documenting Confusion / Mistakes
-
-It is very important to document any confusion or mistakes you encounter in Claude Rules (`.claude/rules`).
-Please see `.codeyam/rules/instructions.md` for guidance.
-
-After making any code changes please run `codeyam memory status` and follow the instructions.
-```
-
-### 1B. Verify Instructions File
-
-Check that `.codeyam/rules/instructions.md` exists (it should be created during `codeyam init`). If missing, copy it from `codeyam-cli/templates/rules-instructions.md`.
-
-### 1C. Install Pre-commit Hook
-
-Check if the project uses Husky (`.husky/` directory exists).
-
-**If using Husky**, append to `.husky/pre-commit`:
-
-```bash
-# CodeYam Memory Up-To-Date Check
-if [ -f ".codeyam/bin/memory-hook.sh" ]; then
-  .codeyam/bin/memory-hook.sh
-fi
-```
-
-**If not using Husky**, create or append to `.git/hooks/pre-commit`.
-
-Ensure `.codeyam/bin/memory-hook.sh` exists and is executable (`chmod +x`).
-
----
-
-## Phase 2: Deep Codebase Analysis
-
-Perform thorough analysis to identify areas that may be confusing. The goal is to find everything that might trip up someone (or Claude) working in this codebase.
-
-### 2A. Analyze Git Commit Messages for Problem Signals
-
-Look for commits indicating gotchas, workarounds, or complexity:
-
-```bash
-# Find commits with problem-indicating keywords
-git log --oneline --since="6 months ago" --grep="fix" --grep="bug" --grep="workaround" --grep="hack" --grep="revert" --grep="oops" --grep="forgot" --grep="actually" --all-match | head -30
-
-# Find commits with long messages (indicate complex changes)
-git log --since="6 months ago" --format="%h %s" | awk 'length($0) > 80' | head -20
-
-# Find reverted commits
-git log --oneline --since="6 months ago" --grep="revert" -i | head -10
-```
-
-For interesting commits, examine the full message and changes:
-
-```bash
-git show <commit-hash> --stat
-git log -1 --format="%B" <commit-hash>
-```
-
-### 2B. Identify Files with High Churn or Complexity Signals
-
-```bash
-# Files changed most frequently (last 6 months)
-git log --since="6 months ago" --name-only --pretty=format: | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -30
-
-# Files with many different authors (tribal knowledge risk)
-git shortlog -sn --since="6 months ago" -- . | head -20
-
-# Files frequently modified together (hidden dependencies)
-git log --since="6 months ago" --name-only --pretty=format: | awk '/^$/{if(NR>1)print "---"}; /./{print}' | head -100
-```
-
-Look for patterns where the same 2-3 files appear together repeatedly.
-
-### 2C. Scan for Developer Notes in Code
-
-```bash
-# Find TODO, FIXME, HACK, XXX, NOTE comments
-grep -rn "TODO\|FIXME\|HACK\|XXX\|NOTE:" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.js" --include="*.jsx" --include="*.py" --include="*.rb" --include="*.go" --include="*.java" --include="*.rs" . 2>/dev/null | head -50
-
-# Find "workaround" or "hack" mentions in comments
-grep -rni "workaround\|hack\|temporary\|legacy" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.js" --include="*.jsx" --include="*.py" . 2>/dev/null | head -30
-```
-
-### 2D. Analyze Project Structure
-
-```bash
-# Get directory structure (2 levels deep)
-find . -type d -maxdepth 3 | grep -v node_modules | grep -v .git | grep -v dist | grep -v build | head -50
-
-# Find config files
-find . -name "*.config.*" -o -name "*.rc" -o -name ".env*" -o -name "tsconfig*" -o -name "package.json" 2>/dev/null | grep -v node_modules | head -30
-
-# Find test directories
-find . -type d -name "*test*" -o -type d -name "*spec*" -o -type d -name "__tests__" 2>/dev/null | grep -v node_modules | head -20
-```
-
-### 2E. Check for Environment and Configuration Complexity
-
-```bash
-# Find environment variable references
-grep -rn "process.env\|os.environ\|ENV\[" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.js" --include="*.py" . 2>/dev/null | head -30
-
-# Find multiple config files that might conflict or confuse
-ls -la *.config.* .*.rc tsconfig*.json 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-### 2F. Review Existing Documentation
-
-Read these files if they exist:
-
-- `README.md`
-- `CLAUDE.md`
-- `CONTRIBUTING.md`
-- `docs/` directory
-- Any `*.md` files in the root
-
-Note what's already documented and what gaps exist.
-
-### 2G. Examine Import/Dependency Patterns
-
-```bash
-# Find files with many imports (high coupling)
-for f in $(find . -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.js" 2>/dev/null | grep -v node_modules | head -100); do
-  count=$(grep -c "^import\|^from\|require(" "$f" 2>/dev/null || echo 0)
-  if [ "$count" -gt 15 ]; then
-    echo "$count $f"
-  fi
-done | sort -rn | head -20
-
-# Find commonly imported local modules (core utilities)
-grep -rh "from '\.\|from \"\.\|require('\.\|require(\"\." --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" --include="*.js" . 2>/dev/null | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20
-```
-
----
-
-## Phase 3: Cluster and Prioritize Findings
-
-After gathering signals, organize them by area/module:
-
-1. **Group findings by directory** - Which parts of the codebase have the most signals?
-2. **Identify themes**:
-   - Architecture patterns (how things connect)
-   - Testing complexity (special setup needed)
-   - Configuration/environment gotchas
-   - Historical workarounds still in place
-   - Non-obvious conventions
-
-3. **Score areas** - More signals = higher priority for documentation
-
-Create a mental map of:
-
-- Which directories/modules are most complex?
-- What relationships exist between different parts?
-- Where are the gotchas hiding?
-
----
-
-## Phase 4: Ask Specific Questions
-
-Based on your analysis, ask the user specific questions about the actual findings. Reference the concrete evidence you found (file names, commit messages, code patterns) and ask about the substance.
-
-Always include "I'm not sure - please investigate" as an option so users can delegate investigation to you.
-
-### Question Format
-
-Ask about the **specific finding**, not the file generally:
-
-**For high-churn files with concerning commits:**
-
-> "ScopeDataStructure.ts has commits mentioning 'exponential blowup' and 'execution flows'. What causes this blowup? When does it happen?"
->
-> Options: [Explain the cause] [I'm not sure - please investigate]
-
-**For files frequently modified together:**
-
-> "`src/api/auth.ts` and `src/middleware/session.ts` are modified together in 12 commits. Why do these need to change together?"
->
-> Options: [Explain the relationship] [I'm not sure - please investigate]
-
-**For commits with workaround language:**
-
-> "Commit `abc123` says 'workaround for webpack issue'. What's the underlying issue and what's the workaround?"
->
-> Options: [Explain] [I'm not sure - please investigate]
-
-**For multiple config files:**
-
-> "There are 3 tsconfig files. When is each one used?"
->
-> Options: [Explain usage] [I'm not sure - please investigate]
-
-**For TODO/FIXME comments:**
-
-> "There's a FIXME in `src/parser.ts:142` about 'handle nested callbacks'. What's the issue with nested callbacks here?"
->
-> Options: [Explain] [I'm not sure - please investigate]
-
-**For test organization:**
-
-> "Tests are split between `__tests__/` folders and colocated `*.test.ts` files. When should each approach be used?"
->
-> Options: [Explain convention] [I'm not sure - please investigate]
-
-### Process
-
-1. Group related questions by area/module
-2. Ask 2-3 questions at a time, wait for answers
-3. If user says "I'm not sure - please investigate":
-   - Read the relevant code, commits, and context yourself
-   - Analyze the patterns and behavior
-   - Document your findings based on what you discover
-4. Move to next area after capturing answers
-
----
-
-## Phase 5: Generate Rules
-
-For each area where you have enough information, create a rule file.
-
-### Rule File Guidelines:
-
-1. **Location mirrors code structure**
-   - Rule for `src/api/` → `.claude/rules/src/api/architecture.md`
-   - Rule for testing patterns → `.claude/rules/testing-patterns.md`
-
-2. **Paths must be specific**
-   - Good: `paths: ['src/api/**/*.ts']`
-   - Bad: `paths: ['**/*.ts']` (too broad, wastes context)
-
-3. **Content should be actionable**
-   - Focus on "how to" and "what to know"
-   - Avoid warnings unless truly critical
-   - Be concise - every word costs context
-
-4. **Timestamp must be current**
-   - Use ISO 8601 format: `2026-01-27T15:30:00Z`
-   - This enables the pre-commit hook enforcement
-
-### Rule Template:
-
-```markdown
----
-paths:
-  - 'specific/path/**/*.ts'
-category: architecture | testing | faq
-timestamp: [CURRENT_ISO_TIMESTAMP]
----
-
-## [Clear, Descriptive Title]
-
-[Concise explanation of what this covers]
-
-### [Section as appropriate]
-
-[Specific, actionable content]
-```
-
----
-
-## Phase 6: Final Review
-
-After generating rules based on your analysis and user answers:
-
-1. **Present a summary** of all rules created
-2. **Ask the user:**
-
-   > "I've created rules covering [list areas]. Are there any other areas of the codebase that you know are confusing or have tribal knowledge that I might have missed?"
-
-3. **Generate any additional rules** based on their response
-
-4. **Suggest viewing rules in the dashboard:**
-
-   > "Run `codeyam` to open the dashboard and view all rules in the Rules tab."
-
-5. **Remind the user** to commit the new rules:
-   ```
-   git add .claude/rules/ .codeyam/rules/
-   git commit -m "Add rules for Claude Code (generated via /codeyam:memory)"
-   ```
-
----
-
-## Ongoing Maintenance
-
-### When Claude Should Update Rules
-
-- After fixing a bug that revealed a gotcha
-- After making an architectural decision
-- When code patterns change
-- When asking "why does this work this way?" and learning the answer
-- When receiving clarification from the user about any confusion
-
-### Pre-commit Hook Behavior
-
-The pre-commit hook **blocks commits** when:
-
-- Code files matching a rule's `paths` are modified
-- The rule's `timestamp` is older than the code changes
-
-To proceed:
-
-1. Review the flagged rule(s)
-2. Update content if needed
-3. Update the `timestamp` to current time
-4. Stage and commit