@codeyam/codeyam-cli 0.1.0-staging.1669d45 → 0.1.0-staging.2a88920

package/analyzer-template/packages/ai/src/lib/astScopes/processExpression.ts

@@ -23,6 +23,112 @@ import {
   extractConditionalEffectsFromTernary,
   findUseStateSetters,
 } from './conditionalEffectsExtractor';
+import { detectArrayDerivedPattern } from './arrayDerivationDetector';
+
+/**
+ * Checks if a JSX element has props that reference variables from the parent scope.
+ * This is used to detect unconditionally-rendered children that should have their
+ * execution flows merged into the parent.
+ *
+ * We want to track children where the parent controls data that affects the child's
+ * conditional rendering. Static props (like title="Dashboard") don't need tracking
+ * because they don't create variable execution flows.
+ *
+ * Examples:
+ * - <WorkoutsView workouts={workouts} /> → true (workouts is a variable)
+ * - <ItemList items={items} count={count} /> → true (items, count are variables)
+ * - <Header title="Dashboard" /> → false (static string)
+ * - <Footer /> → false (no props)
+ * - <Button onClick={handleClick} /> → false (only callback, no data props)
+ *
+ * @returns true if the component has at least one prop that references a variable
+ *          (excluding callbacks which typically start with 'on' or 'handle')
+ */
+function hasDataPropsFromParent(
+  node: ts.JsxElement | ts.JsxSelfClosingElement,
+  componentName: string,
+): { hasDataProps: boolean; dataProps: string[] } {
+  const attributes = ts.isJsxElement(node)
+    ? node.openingElement.attributes.properties
+    : node.attributes.properties;
+
+  const dataProps: string[] = [];
+
+  for (const attr of attributes) {
+    // Spread attributes always reference parent data: {...props}
+    if (ts.isJsxSpreadAttribute(attr)) {
+      const spreadText = attr.expression?.getText() || '...spread';
+      dataProps.push(`{...${spreadText}}`);
+      console.log(
+        `[UnconditionalChild] ${componentName}: Found spread attribute {${spreadText}}`,
+      );
+      continue;
+    }
+
+    if (ts.isJsxAttribute(attr)) {
+      const propName = attr.name.getText();
+
+      // Skip callback props - they don't create data-driven execution flows
+      // Callbacks typically start with 'on' (onClick, onChange) or 'handle' (handleSubmit)
+      if (
+        propName.startsWith('on') ||
+        propName.startsWith('handle') ||
+        propName === 'ref'
+      ) {
+        console.log(
+          `[UnconditionalChild] ${componentName}: Skipping callback prop '${propName}'`,
+        );
+        continue;
+      }
+
+      // Check if the prop value is a JSX expression (references a variable)
+      // vs a string literal which is static
+      if (attr.initializer) {
+        if (ts.isJsxExpression(attr.initializer)) {
+          // JSX expression like prop={value} - this references a variable
+          // Could be a simple identifier, property access, or more complex expression
+          const expression = attr.initializer.expression;
+          if (expression) {
+            // Skip if it's just a function/arrow function (callback)
+            if (
+              ts.isArrowFunction(expression) ||
+              ts.isFunctionExpression(expression)
+            ) {
+              console.log(
+                `[UnconditionalChild] ${componentName}: Skipping inline callback prop '${propName}'`,
+              );
+              continue;
+            }
+            // This is a data prop that references parent state/props
+            const exprText = expression.getText();
+            dataProps.push(`${propName}={${exprText}}`);
+            console.log(
+              `[UnconditionalChild] ${componentName}: Found data prop '${propName}' = {${exprText}}`,
+            );
+          }
+        } else {
+          // String literals like prop="value" are static
+          console.log(
+            `[UnconditionalChild] ${componentName}: Skipping static prop '${propName}'`,
+          );
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  const hasDataProps = dataProps.length > 0;
+  if (hasDataProps) {
+    console.log(
+      `[UnconditionalChild] ${componentName}: Has ${dataProps.length} data props: [${dataProps.join(', ')}]`,
+    );
+  } else {
+    console.log(
+      `[UnconditionalChild] ${componentName}: No data props found, will NOT track`,
+    );
+  }
+
+  return { hasDataProps, dataProps };
+}
 
 /**
  * Extracts the component name from a JSX element.
@@ -368,6 +474,149 @@ function getSourceLocation(
   };
 }
 
+/**
+ * Extracts the root array path from an expression that ends with .map().
+ * Handles chained methods like .filter().map(), .slice().map(), etc.
+ *
+ * Examples:
+ * - items.map(...) → "items"
+ * - data.users.map(...) → "data.users"
+ * - items.filter(...).map(...) → "items"
+ * - items.slice(0, 5).map(...) → "items"
+ */
+function extractArrayPathFromMapCall(
+  expr: ts.CallExpression,
+  sourceFile: ts.SourceFile,
+): string | null {
+  // Walk up the chain to find the root array
+  let current: ts.Expression = expr.expression;
+
+  while (ts.isPropertyAccessExpression(current)) {
+    const methodName = current.name.getText(sourceFile);
+
+    // Common array methods that return arrays (so we keep going up)
+    const arrayReturningMethods = [
+      'map',
+      'filter',
+      'slice',
+      'concat',
+      'flat',
+      'flatMap',
+      'reverse',
+      'sort',
+      'toReversed',
+      'toSorted',
+      'toSpliced',
+    ];
+
+    if (arrayReturningMethods.includes(methodName)) {
+      const objectExpr = current.expression;
+
+      // If the object is a call expression (chained method), keep going
+      if (ts.isCallExpression(objectExpr)) {
+        current = objectExpr.expression;
+      } else {
+        // Found the root - it's an identifier or property access
+        const path = StructuredPath.fromNode(objectExpr, sourceFile);
+        return path ? path.toString() : null;
+      }
+    } else {
+      // Not an array method we recognize
+      break;
+    }
+  }
+
+  return null;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Extracts JSX rendering usages from a JSX expression.
+ * Detects:
+ * - array.map() calls → 'array-map' type
+ * - string interpolations (identifiers/property access) → 'text-interpolation' type
+ *
+ * Recursively searches inside && chains and ternary expressions.
+ *
+ * @param expr The expression inside {expr}
+ * @param context The analysis context
+ */
+function extractJsxRenderingUsage(
+  expr: ts.Expression,
+  context: AnalysisContext,
+): void {
+  const unwrapped = unwrapExpression(expr);
+  const sourceLocation = getSourceLocation(expr, context.sourceFile);
+
+  // Detect array.map() calls
+  if (ts.isCallExpression(unwrapped)) {
+    const calleeExpr = unwrapped.expression;
+
+    if (ts.isPropertyAccessExpression(calleeExpr)) {
+      const methodName = calleeExpr.name.getText(context.sourceFile);
+
+      if (methodName === 'map') {
+        const arrayPath = extractArrayPathFromMapCall(
+          unwrapped,
+          context.sourceFile,
+        );
+
+        if (arrayPath) {
+          context.addJsxRenderingUsage({
+            path: arrayPath,
+            renderingType: 'array-map',
+            valueType: 'array',
+            sourceLocation,
+          });
+        }
+      }
+    }
+  }
+  // Detect simple string interpolations: {title} or {user.name}
+  else if (
+    ts.isIdentifier(unwrapped) ||
+    ts.isPropertyAccessExpression(unwrapped)
+  ) {
+    const path = StructuredPath.fromNode(unwrapped, context.sourceFile);
+
+    if (path) {
+      const pathStr = path.toString();
+      const typeInfo = context.getTypeInfo(path);
+
+      // Only track as text interpolation if it's a string type
+      // Check for 'string' type, or types that contain 'string' (but not 'string[]')
+      if (
+        typeInfo === 'string' ||
+        (typeInfo &&
+          typeInfo.includes('string') &&
+          !typeInfo.includes('string[]'))
+      ) {
+        context.addJsxRenderingUsage({
+          path: pathStr,
+          renderingType: 'text-interpolation',
+          valueType: 'string',
+          sourceLocation,
+        });
+      }
+    }
+  }
+  // Recursively search inside && chains: {showList && items.map(...)}
+  else if (
+    ts.isBinaryExpression(unwrapped) &&
+    unwrapped.operatorToken.kind === ts.SyntaxKind.AmpersandAmpersandToken
+  ) {
+    // Check the right side of the && chain (where .map() typically appears)
+    const rightSide = unwrapExpression(unwrapped.right);
+    extractJsxRenderingUsage(rightSide, context);
+    // Also check nested && chains on the left
+    extractJsxRenderingUsage(unwrapped.left, context);
+  }
+  // Recursively search inside ternaries: {isEmpty ? null : items.map(...)}
+  else if (ts.isConditionalExpression(unwrapped)) {
+    extractJsxRenderingUsage(unwrapped.whenTrue, context);
+    extractJsxRenderingUsage(unwrapped.whenFalse, context);
+  }
+}
+
 /**
  * Counts the number of conditions in an && chain (excluding JSX consequence)
  */
@@ -404,6 +653,12 @@ interface ChainInfo {
   chainExpression: string;
   currentPosition: number;
   compound: CompoundConditional;
+  /**
+   * When processing OR expressions within an && chain, this tracks the
+   * current OR group ID. Conditions added while this is set will be marked
+   * as OR alternatives (only one needs to be true).
+   */
+  currentOrGroupId?: string;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -460,6 +715,10 @@ function extractConditionalsFromJsx(
     if (ts.isJsxExpression(child) && child.expression) {
       const expr = unwrapExpression(child.expression);
 
+      // Extract JSX rendering usages (array.map, text interpolation)
+      // This handles direct usages like {items.map(...)} or {user.name}
+      extractJsxRenderingUsage(expr, context);
+
       // If the expression is an && chain, extract its conditional usages
       if (
         ts.isBinaryExpression(expr) &&
@@ -766,8 +1025,104 @@ function extractConditionalsFromJsx(
     }
     // Recursively process nested JSX elements - Fix 32: pass parent conditions
     else if (ts.isJsxElement(child)) {
+      // Check if this is a user-defined component (vs intrinsic element like div)
+      const componentName = getComponentNameFromJsx(child);
+      if (componentName) {
+        if (parentConditions.length > 0) {
+          // If there are parent conditions, record them as gating conditions
+          console.log(
+            `[ChildBoundary] ${componentName}: Conditionally rendered with ${parentConditions.length} gating conditions`,
+          );
+          for (const condition of parentConditions) {
+            console.log(
+              `[ChildBoundary] ${componentName}: Adding gating condition path='${condition.path}' isNegated=${condition.isNegated}`,
+            );
+            context.addChildBoundaryGatingCondition(componentName, {
+              path: condition.path,
+              conditionType: 'truthiness',
+              location: 'ternary',
+              sourceLocation: condition.sourceLocation,
+              controlsJsxRendering: true,
+              isNegated: condition.isNegated,
+            });
+          }
+        } else {
+          // No parent conditions - check if it has data props for unconditional tracking
+          console.log(
+            `[ChildBoundary] ${componentName}: Checking for unconditional rendering with data props...`,
+          );
+          const { hasDataProps, dataProps } = hasDataPropsFromParent(
+            child,
+            componentName,
+          );
+          if (hasDataProps) {
+            // Fix: Track unconditionally-rendered children that receive data props
+            // These need to be tracked for flow merging even without gating conditions
+            // Example: <WorkoutsView workouts={workouts} /> - parent controls workouts data
+            console.log(
+              `[ChildBoundary] ${componentName}: TRACKING as unconditionally-rendered with data props: [${dataProps.join(', ')}]`,
+            );
+            context.addChildBoundaryGatingCondition(componentName, {
+              path: '__unconditional__',
+              conditionType: 'truthiness',
+              location: 'unconditional',
+              controlsJsxRendering: true,
+              isNegated: false,
+            });
+          }
+        }
+      }
       extractConditionalsFromJsx(child, context, parentConditions);
     }
+    // Handle self-closing JSX elements (e.g., <ScenarioViewer />)
+    else if (ts.isJsxSelfClosingElement(child)) {
+      // Check if this is a user-defined component (vs intrinsic element like div)
+      const componentName = getComponentNameFromJsx(child);
+      if (componentName) {
+        if (parentConditions.length > 0) {
+          // If there are parent conditions, record them as gating conditions
+          console.log(
+            `[ChildBoundary] ${componentName}: Conditionally rendered (self-closing) with ${parentConditions.length} gating conditions`,
+          );
+          for (const condition of parentConditions) {
+            console.log(
+              `[ChildBoundary] ${componentName}: Adding gating condition path='${condition.path}' isNegated=${condition.isNegated}`,
+            );
+            context.addChildBoundaryGatingCondition(componentName, {
+              path: condition.path,
+              conditionType: 'truthiness',
+              location: 'ternary',
+              sourceLocation: condition.sourceLocation,
+              controlsJsxRendering: true,
+              isNegated: condition.isNegated,
+            });
+          }
+        } else {
+          // No parent conditions - check if it has data props for unconditional tracking
+          console.log(
+            `[ChildBoundary] ${componentName}: Checking for unconditional rendering (self-closing) with data props...`,
+          );
+          const { hasDataProps, dataProps } = hasDataPropsFromParent(
+            child,
+            componentName,
+          );
+          if (hasDataProps) {
+            // Fix: Track unconditionally-rendered children that receive data props
+            console.log(
+              `[ChildBoundary] ${componentName}: TRACKING as unconditionally-rendered (self-closing) with data props: [${dataProps.join(', ')}]`,
+            );
+            context.addChildBoundaryGatingCondition(componentName, {
+              path: '__unconditional__',
+              conditionType: 'truthiness',
+              location: 'unconditional',
+              controlsJsxRendering: true,
+              isNegated: false,
+            });
+          }
+        }
+      }
+      // Self-closing elements have no children, so no recursion needed
+    }
     // Recursively process nested JSX fragments - Fix 32: pass parent conditions
     else if (ts.isJsxFragment(child)) {
       extractConditionalsFromJsx(child, context, parentConditions);
@@ -870,14 +1225,37 @@ export function extractConditionalUsage(
     }
 
     // Handle binary expressions with || (logical OR)
-    // OR breaks the chain - each side is independent
+    // When OR is inside an && chain, we need to continue chain tracking
+    // and mark conditions as OR alternatives
     if (
       ts.isBinaryExpression(unwrapped) &&
       unwrapped.operatorToken.kind === ts.SyntaxKind.BarBarToken
     ) {
-      // Both sides of || are independent conditional checks (no chain tracking)
-      extractWithChainTracking(unwrapped.left, null, false);
-      extractWithChainTracking(unwrapped.right, null, false);
+      if (chainInfo) {
+        // We're inside an && chain - continue tracking but mark as OR alternatives
+        // Generate an orGroupId so conditions from both sides can be grouped
+        const orGroupId =
+          chainInfo.currentOrGroupId ?? `or_${crypto.randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}`;
+
+        // Process left side with OR group tracking
+        const leftChainInfo = {
+          ...chainInfo,
+          currentOrGroupId: orGroupId,
+        };
+        extractWithChainTracking(unwrapped.left, leftChainInfo, false);
+
+        // Process right side with same OR group
+        // Note: we use leftChainInfo's currentPosition which may have been updated
+        const rightChainInfo = {
+          ...leftChainInfo,
+          currentPosition: chainInfo.currentPosition,
+        };
+        extractWithChainTracking(unwrapped.right, rightChainInfo, false);
+      } else {
+        // Not inside a chain - OR breaks into independent conditional checks
+        extractWithChainTracking(unwrapped.left, null, false);
+        extractWithChainTracking(unwrapped.right, null, false);
+      }
       return;
     }
 
@@ -922,6 +1300,7 @@ export function extractConditionalUsage(
         conditionType: 'comparison' | 'truthiness',
         comparedValues?: string[],
         requiredValue?: string | boolean,
+        sourceExpr?: ts.Expression,
       ) => {
         const usage: ConditionalUsage = {
           path,
@@ -933,6 +1312,17 @@ export function extractConditionalUsage(
           controlsJsxRendering,
         };
 
+        // Check for inline array-derived patterns (.length) on the source expression
+        if (sourceExpr) {
+          const arrayDerived = detectArrayDerivedPattern(sourceExpr);
+          if (arrayDerived) {
+            usage.derivedFrom = {
+              operation: arrayDerived.operation,
+              sourcePath: arrayDerived.sourcePath,
+            };
+          }
+        }
+
         // Add chain info if part of a compound conditional
         if (chainInfo) {
           usage.chainId = chainInfo.chainId;
@@ -948,6 +1338,9 @@ export function extractConditionalUsage(
             comparedValues,
             isNegated,
             requiredValue,
+            ...(chainInfo.currentOrGroupId && {
+              orGroupId: chainInfo.currentOrGroupId,
+            }),
           });
         }
 
@@ -962,6 +1355,7 @@ export function extractConditionalUsage(
           'comparison',
           literalValue !== undefined ? [literalValue] : undefined,
           getRequiredValue(literalValue, isNegated),
+          unwrapped.left, // Pass source expression for array derivation detection
         );
         return;
       }
@@ -974,16 +1368,29 @@ export function extractConditionalUsage(
           'comparison',
           literalValue !== undefined ? [literalValue] : undefined,
           getRequiredValue(literalValue, isNegated),
+          unwrapped.right, // Pass source expression for array derivation detection
         );
         return;
       }
 
       // Both sides are variables - record both as comparisons without specific values
       if (leftPath) {
-        addCondition(leftPath.toLeftHandSideString(), 'comparison');
+        addCondition(
+          leftPath.toLeftHandSideString(),
+          'comparison',
+          undefined,
+          undefined,
+          unwrapped.left,
+        );
       }
       if (rightPath) {
-        addCondition(rightPath.toLeftHandSideString(), 'comparison');
+        addCondition(
+          rightPath.toLeftHandSideString(),
+          'comparison',
+          undefined,
+          undefined,
+          unwrapped.right,
+        );
       }
       return;
     }
@@ -1012,6 +1419,16 @@ export function extractConditionalUsage(
         controlsJsxRendering,
       };
 
+      // Check for inline array-derived patterns (.some(), .every(), .includes(), .length)
+      // This populates derivedFrom so downstream code can resolve to the base array path
+      const arrayDerived = detectArrayDerivedPattern(unwrapped);
+      if (arrayDerived) {
+        usage.derivedFrom = {
+          operation: arrayDerived.operation,
+          sourcePath: arrayDerived.sourcePath,
+        };
+      }
+
       // Add chain info if part of a compound conditional
       if (chainInfo) {
         usage.chainId = chainInfo.chainId;
@@ -1027,6 +1444,9 @@ export function extractConditionalUsage(
           conditionType: 'truthiness',
           isNegated,
           requiredValue: !isNegated,
+          ...(chainInfo.currentOrGroupId && {
+            orGroupId: chainInfo.currentOrGroupId,
+          }),
         });
       }
 
@@ -1196,7 +1616,7 @@ export function processExpression({
       const structure = context.getStructure();
 
       // Propagate existing equivalencies for sub-properties
-      for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(equivalentVariables)) {
+      for (const [key, rawValue] of Object.entries(equivalentVariables)) {
         // Check if this equivalency is for a sub-property of the identifier
         // e.g., completeDataStructure['Function Arguments'] or completeDataStructure.foo
         if (
@@ -1207,8 +1627,14 @@ export function processExpression({
           const newTargetPath = StructuredPath.fromBase(
             targetPath.toString() + subPath,
           );
-          const valuePath = StructuredPath.fromBase(value);
-          context.addEquivalence(newTargetPath, valuePath);
+          // Handle both string and string[] values
+          const values = Array.isArray(rawValue) ? rawValue : [rawValue];
+          for (const value of values) {
+            if (typeof value === 'string') {
+              const valuePath = StructuredPath.fromBase(value);
+              context.addEquivalence(newTargetPath, valuePath);
+            }
+          }
         }
       }
 
@@ -1686,15 +2112,55 @@ export function processExpression({
             );
           }
         } else if (operatorKind === ts.SyntaxKind.BarBarToken) {
-          // For ||, also create an equivalence to the left side
+          // For ||, create equivalences to BOTH sides
           // This enables data flow tracing through fallback expressions
+          // e.g., `const item = items.find(...) || null` should trace to both:
+          //   - items[] (from the find result)
+          //   - null (from the fallback)
           if (targetPath) {
-            resultPath = StructuredPath.fromNode(
+            // Get paths for both sides
+            const leftPath = StructuredPath.fromNode(
               unwrappedNode.left,
               context.sourceFile,
             );
+            const rightPath = StructuredPath.fromNode(
+              unwrappedNode.right,
+              context.sourceFile,
+            );
+
+            // Collect all valid paths
+            const allPaths: StructuredPath[] = [];
+            if (leftPath) allPaths.push(leftPath);
+            if (rightPath) allPaths.push(rightPath);
+
+            // Add multiple equivalencies to track both sources
+            if (allPaths.length > 0) {
+              context.addMultipleEquivalencies(targetPath, allPaths);
+            }
+
+            // Process both sides to capture their internal structures
+            processExpression({
+              node: unwrappedNode.left,
+              context,
+            });
+            processExpression({
+              node: unwrappedNode.right,
+              context,
+            });
+
+            // Register the type for the target path
+            const leftType = context.inferTypeFromNode(unwrappedNode.left);
+            const rightType = context.inferTypeFromNode(unwrappedNode.right);
+            const orResultType = isDefinedType(leftType)
+              ? leftType
+              : rightType || 'unknown';
+            context.addType(targetPath, orResultType);
+
+            // Return early - we've already handled equivalencies with addMultipleEquivalencies
+            // Don't fall through to the generic addEquivalence call below
+            return true;
           }
-          // Note: Unlike ??, we don't set targetPath when there's no target
+          // Note: When there's no targetPath, we don't recursively process
           // because || is often used in boolean contexts where the full expression matters
         }
       } else if (operatorKind === ts.SyntaxKind.InstanceOfKeyword) {
@@ -1802,24 +2268,56 @@ export function processExpression({
 
         // Get the source expression path (e.g., the object for obj.method())
         const sourceExpr = unwrappedNode.expression.expression;
-        const sourcePath = StructuredPath.fromNode(
-          sourceExpr,
-          context.sourceFile,
-        );
+        const unwrappedSourceExpr = unwrapExpression(sourceExpr);
+
+        // When the source is a ternary expression like (cond ? arr : arr.slice()),
+        // apply method semantics to BOTH branches directly. The ternary itself isn't
+        // a variable - it's just a choice between two paths that both flow to the result.
+        if (ts.isConditionalExpression(unwrappedSourceExpr)) {
+          const branches = [
+            unwrappedSourceExpr.whenTrue,
+            unwrappedSourceExpr.whenFalse,
+          ];
 
-        if (sourcePath) {
-          // For array-specific semantics (like push), verify the source is actually an array
-          // This prevents router.push() from being mistakenly treated as Array.push()
-          const isArraySemantics = semantics instanceof ArrayPushSemantics;
-          const shouldApply =
-            !isArraySemantics ||
-            isLikelyArrayType(sourceExpr, context.typeChecker);
+          for (const branch of branches) {
+            const branchPath = StructuredPath.fromNode(
+              branch,
+              context.sourceFile,
+            );
+            if (branchPath) {
+              const isArraySemantics = semantics instanceof ArrayPushSemantics;
+              const shouldApply =
+                !isArraySemantics ||
+                isLikelyArrayType(branch, context.typeChecker);
+
+              if (shouldApply) {
+                semantics.addEquivalences(callPath, branchPath, context);
+                returnType = semantics.getReturnType();
+                handledBySemantics = true;
+              }
+            }
+          }
+        } else {
+          // Regular (non-ternary) source expression
+          const sourcePath = StructuredPath.fromNode(
+            sourceExpr,
+            context.sourceFile,
+          );
 
-          if (shouldApply) {
-            // Apply method semantics
-            semantics.addEquivalences(callPath, sourcePath, context);
-            returnType = semantics.getReturnType();
-            handledBySemantics = true;
+          if (sourcePath) {
+            // For array-specific semantics (like push), verify the source is actually an array
+            // This prevents router.push() from being mistakenly treated as Array.push()
+            const isArraySemantics = semantics instanceof ArrayPushSemantics;
+            const shouldApply =
+              !isArraySemantics ||
+              isLikelyArrayType(sourceExpr, context.typeChecker);
+
+            if (shouldApply) {
+              // Apply method semantics
+              semantics.addEquivalences(callPath, sourcePath, context);
+              returnType = semantics.getReturnType();
+              handledBySemantics = true;
+            }
           }
         }
       }
@@ -2377,6 +2875,35 @@ export function processExpression({
 
   // Handle Arrow Functions: (p) => p.prop, (a, b) => { ... }
   if (ts.isArrowFunction(unwrappedNode)) {
+    // If this arrow function is a child boundary (e.g., a .map() callback),
+    // don't process its parameters here - they will be processed when the
+    // child scope is analyzed separately. This prevents parameter variables
+    // from leaking into the parent scope's equivalencies.
+    // Check if this arrow function is a child boundary (i.e., should be processed
+    // as a separate child scope, not here in the parent scope).
+    //
+    // We use two checks because childBoundary positions can be unreliable:
+    // 1. Position-based check (standard isChildBoundary)
+    // 2. Text-based check: if the arrow function text doesn't appear in the
+    //    statement text, it was replaced with a cyScope placeholder
+    const isChildBoundary = context.isChildBoundary(unwrappedNode);
+
+    // Text-based child scope detection for when positions are unreliable
+    const arrowFnText = unwrappedNode.getText(context.sourceFile);
+    const firstLine = arrowFnText.split('\n')[0].trim();
+    const searchText = firstLine.substring(0, Math.min(20, firstLine.length));
+    const isInStatementText = context.statementInfo.text.includes(searchText);
+    const isChildScope = !isInStatementText && arrowFnText.length > 10;
+
+    if (isChildBoundary || isChildScope) {
+      // The method semantics (e.g., ArrayMapSemantics) have already established
+      // the necessary equivalences between the child scope placeholder and array elements
+      if (targetPath) {
+        context.addType(targetPath, 'function');
+      }
+      return true;
+    }
+
     // Create a path for the function
     const functionPath = StructuredPath.empty();