@codewalla_india/openspec 1.3.0 → 1.3.2

package/dist/core/templates/workflows/bulk-archive-change.js

@@ -1,246 +1,335 @@
 import { STORE_SELECTION_GUIDANCE } from './store-selection.js';
-import { PROMPT_CONFIRM, PROMPT_MULTI_SELECT_CHANGES } from './user-prompt-guidance.js';
 export function getBulkArchiveChangeSkillTemplate() {
     return {
         name: 'openspec-bulk-archive-change',
         description: 'Archive multiple completed changes at once. Use when archiving several parallel changes.',
-        instructions: `Archive multiple completed changes in a single operation.
-
-This skill allows you to batch-archive changes, handling spec conflicts intelligently by checking the codebase to determine what's actually implemented.
-
-${STORE_SELECTION_GUIDANCE}
-
-**Input**: None required (prompts for selection)
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Get active changes**
-
-   Run \`openspec list --json\` to get all active changes.
-
-   If no active changes exist, inform user and stop.
-
-2. **Prompt for change selection**
-
-   ${PROMPT_MULTI_SELECT_CHANGES}
-   - Show each change with its schema
-   - Include an option for "All changes"
-   - Allow any number of selections (1+ works, 2+ is the typical use case)
-
-   **IMPORTANT**: Do NOT auto-select. Always let the user choose.
-
-3. **Batch validation - gather status for all selected changes**
-
-   For each selected change, collect:
-
-   a. **Artifact status** - Run \`openspec status --change "<name>" --json\`
-      - Parse \`schemaName\`, \`artifacts\`, \`planningHome\`, \`changeRoot\`, \`artifactPaths\`, and \`actionContext\`
-      - Note which artifacts are \`done\` vs other states
-
-   b. **Task completion** - Read \`artifactPaths.tasks.existingOutputPaths\` from status JSON
-      - Count \`- [ ]\` (incomplete) vs \`- [x]\` (complete)
-      - If no tasks file exists, note as "No tasks"
-
-   c. **Delta specs** - Check \`artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths\` from status JSON
-      - List which capability specs exist
-      - For each, extract requirement names (lines matching \`### Requirement: <name>\`)
-
-4. **Detect spec conflicts**
-
-   Build a map of \`capability -> [changes that touch it]\`:
-
-   \`\`\`
-   auth -> [change-a, change-b]  <- CONFLICT (2+ changes)
-   api  -> [change-c]            <- OK (only 1 change)
-   \`\`\`
-
-   A conflict exists when 2+ selected changes have delta specs for the same capability.
-
-5. **Resolve conflicts agentically**
-
-   **For each conflict**, investigate the codebase:
-
-   a. **Read the delta specs** from each conflicting change to understand what each claims to add/modify
-
-   b. **Search the codebase** for implementation evidence:
-      - Look for code implementing requirements from each delta spec
-      - Check for related files, functions, or tests
-
-   c. **Determine resolution**:
-      - If only one change is actually implemented -> sync that one's specs
-      - If both implemented -> apply in chronological order (older first, newer overwrites)
-      - If neither implemented -> skip spec sync, warn user
-
-   d. **Record resolution** for each conflict:
-      - Which change's specs to apply
-      - In what order (if both)
-      - Rationale (what was found in codebase)
-
-6. **Show consolidated status table**
-
-   Display a table summarizing all changes:
-
-   \`\`\`
-   | Change              | Artifacts | Tasks | Specs   | Conflicts | Status |
-   |---------------------|-----------|-------|---------|-----------|--------|
-   | schema-management   | Done      | 5/5   | 2 delta | None      | Ready  |
-   | project-config      | Done      | 3/3   | 1 delta | None      | Ready  |
-   | add-oauth           | Done      | 4/4   | 1 delta | auth (!)  | Ready* |
-   | add-verify-skill    | 1 left    | 2/5   | None    | None      | Warn   |
-   \`\`\`
-
-   For conflicts, show the resolution:
-   \`\`\`
-   * Conflict resolution:
-     - auth spec: Will apply add-oauth then add-jwt (both implemented, chronological order)
-   \`\`\`
-
-   For incomplete changes, show warnings:
-   \`\`\`
-   Warnings:
-   - add-verify-skill: 1 incomplete artifact, 3 incomplete tasks
-   \`\`\`
-
-7. **Confirm batch operation**
-
-   ${PROMPT_CONFIRM}
-
-   - "Archive N changes?" with options based on status
-   - Options might include:
-     - "Archive all N changes"
-     - "Archive only N ready changes (skip incomplete)"
-     - "Cancel"
-
-   If there are incomplete changes, make clear they'll be archived with warnings.
-
-8. **Execute archive for each confirmed change**
-
-   Process changes in the determined order (respecting conflict resolution):
-
-   a. **Sync specs** if delta specs exist:
-      - Use the openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven intelligent merge)
-      - For conflicts, apply in resolved order
-      - Track if sync was done
-
-   b. **Perform the archive**:
-      \`\`\`bash
-      mkdir -p "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive"
-      mv "<changeRoot>" "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>"
-      \`\`\`
-
-   c. **Track outcome** for each change:
-      - Success: archived successfully
-      - Failed: error during archive (record error)
-      - Skipped: user chose not to archive (if applicable)
-
-9. **Display summary**
-
-   Show final results:
-
-   \`\`\`
-   ## Bulk Archive Complete
-
-   Archived 3 changes:
-   - schema-management-cli -> archive/2026-01-19-schema-management-cli/
-   - project-config -> archive/2026-01-19-project-config/
-   - add-oauth -> archive/2026-01-19-add-oauth/
-
-   Skipped 1 change:
-   - add-verify-skill (user chose not to archive incomplete)
-
-   Spec sync summary:
-   - 4 delta specs synced to main specs
-   - 1 conflict resolved (auth: applied both in chronological order)
-   \`\`\`
-
-   If any failures:
-   \`\`\`
-   Failed 1 change:
-   - some-change: Archive directory already exists
-   \`\`\`
-
-**Conflict Resolution Examples**
-
-Example 1: Only one implemented
-\`\`\`
-Conflict: specs/auth/spec.md touched by [add-oauth, add-jwt]
-
-Checking add-oauth:
-- Delta adds "OAuth Provider Integration" requirement
-- Searching codebase... found src/auth/oauth.ts implementing OAuth flow
-
-Checking add-jwt:
-- Delta adds "JWT Token Handling" requirement
-- Searching codebase... no JWT implementation found
-
-Resolution: Only add-oauth is implemented. Will sync add-oauth specs only.
-\`\`\`
-
-Example 2: Both implemented
-\`\`\`
-Conflict: specs/api/spec.md touched by [add-rest-api, add-graphql]
-
-Checking add-rest-api (created 2026-01-10):
-- Delta adds "REST Endpoints" requirement
-- Searching codebase... found src/api/rest.ts
-
-Checking add-graphql (created 2026-01-15):
-- Delta adds "GraphQL Schema" requirement
-- Searching codebase... found src/api/graphql.ts
-
-Resolution: Both implemented. Will apply add-rest-api specs first,
-then add-graphql specs (chronological order, newer takes precedence).
-\`\`\`
-
-**Output On Success**
-
-\`\`\`
-## Bulk Archive Complete
-
-Archived N changes:
-- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/
-- <change-2> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-2>/
-
-Spec sync summary:
-- N delta specs synced to main specs
-- No conflicts (or: M conflicts resolved)
-\`\`\`
-
-**Output On Partial Success**
-
-\`\`\`
-## Bulk Archive Complete (partial)
-
-Archived N changes:
-- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/
-
-Skipped M changes:
-- <change-2> (user chose not to archive incomplete)
-
-Failed K changes:
-- <change-3>: Archive directory already exists
-\`\`\`
-
-**Output When No Changes**
-
-\`\`\`
-## No Changes to Archive
-
-No active changes found. Create a new change to get started.
-\`\`\`
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Allow any number of changes (1+ is fine, 2+ is the typical use case)
-- Always prompt for selection, never auto-select
-- Detect spec conflicts early and resolve by checking codebase
-- When both changes are implemented, apply specs in chronological order
-- Skip spec sync only when implementation is missing (warn user)
-- Show clear per-change status before confirming
-- Use single confirmation for entire batch
-- Track and report all outcomes (success/skip/fail)
-- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive
-- Archive directory target uses current date: YYYY-MM-DD-<name>
-- If archive target exists, fail that change but continue with others`,
+        instructions: `Archive multiple completed changes in a single operation.
+
+This skill allows you to batch-archive changes, handling spec conflicts intelligently by checking the codebase to determine what's actually implemented.
+
+${STORE_SELECTION_GUIDANCE}
+
+\`<capability-path>\` is the spec directory relative to \`specs/\` (for example, \`user-auth\` or \`identity/user-auth\`). Preserve the full path from each delta spec when resolving its main spec.
+
+**Input**: None required (prompts for selection)
+
+**Steps**
+
+1. **Get active changes**
+
+   Run \`openspec list --json\` to get all active changes.
+
+   If no active changes exist, inform user and stop.
+
+2. **Prompt for change selection**
+
+   Ask the user to choose changes (multi-select):
+   - Show each change with its schema
+   - Include an option for "All changes"
+   - Allow any number of selections (1+ works, 2+ is the typical use case)
+
+   **IMPORTANT**: Do NOT auto-select. Always let the user choose.
+
+   **Load current archive inputs once for the selected root before batch validation:**
+
+   Choose one selected change from this root and run
+   \`openspec instructions archive --change "<selected-change>" --json\` with the
+   same selected-root flags. This lookup is advisory and optional: it only supplies
+   extra prompt inputs, so it must never block the batch. If it fails or returns
+   invalid JSON — for example on an older CLI that does not support this command
+   yet — continue the batch with no context and no operation guidance. Do not
+   report an error and do not stop.
+
+   A valid response may omit \`context\` and \`operationGuidance\`. Treat
+   \`context\` as a required prompt-level input across the batch: read and consider
+   it, and apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints. Treat
+   \`operationGuidance\` as optional additive advice: read and consider every
+   entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in
+   batch workflow.
+
+   Keep both fields separate from conflict analysis, explicit user choices,
+   resolved paths, CLI checks, and command contracts. If context conflicts with one
+   of those controlling inputs, report the conflict and preserve the controlling
+   value. If guidance is inapplicable or conflicts with a controlling input, do not
+   follow it and explain why. Do not infer skipped prompts, replacement paths, or
+   flags from either field, and do not copy their text verbatim into specs, changes,
+   or summaries. These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
+
+3. **Batch validation - gather status for all selected changes**
+
+   For each selected change, collect:
+
+   a. **Artifact status** - Run \`openspec status --change "<name>" --json\`
+      - Parse \`schemaName\`, \`artifacts\`, \`planningHome\`, \`changeRoot\`, \`artifactPaths\`, and \`actionContext\`
+      - Note which artifacts are \`done\` vs other states
+
+   b. **Task completion** - Read \`artifactPaths.tasks.existingOutputPaths\` from status JSON
+      - Count \`- [ ]\` (incomplete) vs \`- [x]\` (complete)
+      - If no tasks file exists, note as "No tasks"
+
+   c. **Delta specs** - Check \`artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths\` from status JSON
+      - List which capability specs exist
+      - For each, extract requirement names (lines matching \`### Requirement: <name>\`)
+      - Treat this list as the only delta-spec source. If the \`specs\` entry is
+        missing or the list is empty, perform no spec sync or specs-instruction
+        lookup for that change; do not infer deltas from unrelated artifacts.
+      - Evaluate this independently for every change, including mixed-schema
+        batches where some schemas have no \`specs\` artifact.
+4. **Detect spec conflicts**
+
+   Build a map keyed by \`<capability-path>\`, the exact path relative to \`specs/\`:
+
+   \`\`\`text
+   identity/user-auth -> [change-a, change-b]  <- CONFLICT (2+ changes)
+   billing/user-auth  -> [change-c]            <- OK (different full path)
+   \`\`\`
+
+   A conflict exists when 2+ selected changes have delta specs for the exact same \`<capability-path>\`.
+
+5. **Resolve conflicts agentically**
+
+   **For each conflict**, investigate the codebase:
+
+   a. **Read the delta specs** from each conflicting change to understand what each claims to add/modify
+
+   b. **Search the codebase** for implementation evidence:
+      - Look for code implementing requirements from each delta spec
+      - Check for related files, functions, or tests
+
+   c. **Determine resolution**:
+      - If only one change is actually implemented -> sync that one's specs
+      - If both implemented -> apply in chronological order (older first, newer overwrites)
+      - If neither implemented -> skip spec sync, warn user
+
+   d. **Record resolution** for each conflict:
+      - An inclusion or exclusion decision for every delta spec, keyed by change and \`<capability-path>\`
+      - Which included delta specs to apply and in what order
+      - Which delta specs to exclude from sync because their implementation is missing
+      - Rationale (what was found in codebase)
+
+6. **Show consolidated status table**
+
+   Display a table summarizing all changes:
+
+   \`\`\`markdown
+   | Change              | Artifacts | Tasks | Specs   | Conflicts | Status |
+   |---------------------|-----------|-------|---------|-----------|--------|
+   | schema-management   | Done      | 5/5   | 2 delta | None      | Ready  |
+   | project-config      | Done      | 3/3   | 1 delta | None      | Ready  |
+   | add-oauth           | Done      | 4/4   | 1 delta | identity/user-auth (!) | Ready* |
+   | add-verify-skill    | 1 left    | 2/5   | None    | None      | Warn   |
+   \`\`\`
+
+   For conflicts, show the resolution:
+   \`\`\`text
+   * Conflict resolution:
+     - identity/user-auth spec: Will apply add-oauth then add-jwt (both implemented, chronological order)
+   \`\`\`
+
+   For incomplete changes, show warnings:
+   \`\`\`text
+   Warnings:
+   - add-verify-skill: 1 incomplete artifact, 3 incomplete tasks
+   \`\`\`
+
+7. **Confirm batch operation**
+
+   Ask the user a single confirmation question:
+
+   - "Archive N changes?" with options based on status
+   - Options might include:
+     - "Archive all N changes"
+     - "Archive only N ready changes (skip incomplete)"
+     - "Cancel"
+
+   If there are incomplete changes, make clear they'll be archived with warnings.
+
+   Route on the answer by intent, not by exact label — you wrote these labels,
+   so match what the user picked rather than the wording above:
+   - "Cancel" — stop, do not archive. Report that nothing was archived and skip the remaining steps.
+   - The archive-everything option — proceed with every selected change
+   - The ready-only option — proceed with only the changes the step 6 table marks \`Ready\` or \`Ready*\`, and record the rest as Skipped in step 8d. If a \`Ready*\` change's conflict partner is skipped, re-derive that conflict's resolution using only the changes being archived.
+   - Anything else — ask again rather than archiving
+
+   Before step 8 writes the first main spec or moves any change, fetch every
+   required specs-rule snapshot for the confirmed batch. For each change that will
+   sync concrete \`artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths\`, run
+   \`openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json\` exactly once with the
+   same selected-root flags. Obtain all snapshots before the first write or move.
+   If any lookup exits non-zero or returns invalid artifact-instruction JSON,
+   identify the affected change, report the error, and stop the whole batch before
+   any main-spec write or change move. Do not treat lookup failure as omitted
+   rules. A valid response without \`rules\` is the no-rules case.
+
+8. **Execute archive for each confirmed change**
+
+   Before processing, carry the recorded decisions from step 5 (after any step 7 re-derivation) into two per-delta sets:
+   - \`includedDeltas\`: all non-conflicting delta specs from confirmed changes plus conflict deltas selected for sync
+   - \`excludedDeltas\`: conflict deltas from confirmed changes excluded because their implementation is missing
+   - A single change can have both included and excluded delta specs. Keep the decision per delta; do not collapse it into a per-change sync flag.
+
+   Process changes in the determined order (respecting conflict resolution):
+
+   a. **Sync included delta specs**:
+      - Run the \`openspec-sync-specs\` workflow inline (agent-driven intelligent merge) only for changes with entries in \`includedDeltas\`, passing only the included delta paths and explicitly instructing it to ignore that change's \`excludedDeltas\`. Wait for it to finish.
+      - For conflicts, apply in resolved order.
+      - Pass that change's fetched specs-rule snapshot into inline sync; inline
+        sync must reuse it without fetching instructions again
+      - Apply artifact rules only to main specs produced by that change. They do
+        not change conflict resolution, archive behavior, or CLI contracts, and
+        their text is not copied into an output file
+      - Do not delegate to a background task — step 8c would move \`changeRoot\` out from under a sync that is still reading it.
+      - If a change has no included delta specs, do not run the sync workflow for it.
+
+   b. **Verify included delta specs before moving changeRoot**:
+      - Re-run the comparison only for delta specs in \`includedDeltas\` against main spec at \`<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability-path>/spec.md\` (use the store-aware \`planningHome.root\` from step 3 status JSON, not a hardcoded repo path).
+      - Verify that main specs are updated:
+        - ADDED requirements present
+        - MODIFIED requirements carrying scenario and description changes named in the delta, with their other scenarios intact
+        - REMOVED requirements gone — and where this sync retired a capability (removed its last requirement, leaving \`## Requirements\` empty), its main spec deleted rather than left empty; a spec the sync deliberately kept and reported is also a match
+        - RENAMED requirements present under the new name and absent under the old one
+      - Do not verify delta specs in \`excludedDeltas\`; they are intentionally left unsynced.
+      - If sync failed or any capability does not match verification, report what differs and fail/skip moving that change's \`changeRoot\` — do not archive that change. \`changeRoot\` remains intact.
+
+   c. **Perform the archive**:
+
+      Target name: use the change name as-is when it already starts with a \`YYYY-MM-DD-\` prefix; otherwise prepend the current date as \`YYYY-MM-DD-<name>\` (same rule as \`openspec archive\`).
+
+      \`\`\`bash
+      mkdir -p "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive"
+      mv "<changeRoot>" "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive/<target-name>"
+      \`\`\`
+
+   d. **Track outcome** for each change:
+      - Success: archived successfully
+      - Failed: error during archive or spec verification (record error)
+      - Skipped: user chose not to archive (if applicable)
+      - Sync skipped: for every delta in \`excludedDeltas\`, report \`sync skipped\` with the change, \`<capability-path>\`, and recorded reason. This is distinct from skipping the archive.
+
+9. **Display summary**
+
+   Show final results:
+
+   \`\`\`markdown
+   ## Bulk Archive Complete
+
+   Archived 3 changes:
+   - schema-management-cli -> archive/2026-01-19-schema-management-cli/
+   - project-config -> archive/2026-01-19-project-config/
+   - add-oauth -> archive/2026-01-19-add-oauth/
+
+   Skipped 1 change:
+   - add-verify-skill (user chose not to archive incomplete)
+
+   Spec sync summary:
+   - 4 delta specs synced to main specs
+   - 1 delta spec sync skipped (add-jwt, identity/user-auth: implementation not found)
+   - 1 conflict resolved (identity/user-auth: synced add-oauth, skipped add-jwt)
+   \`\`\`
+
+   If any failures:
+   \`\`\`text
+   Failed 1 change:
+   - some-change: Archive directory already exists
+   \`\`\`
+
+**Conflict Resolution Examples**
+
+Example 1: Only one implemented
+\`\`\`text
+Conflict: <planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/auth/spec.md touched by [add-oauth, add-jwt]
+
+Checking add-oauth:
+- Delta adds "OAuth Provider Integration" requirement
+- Searching codebase... found src/auth/oauth.ts implementing OAuth flow
+
+Checking add-jwt:
+- Delta adds "JWT Token Handling" requirement
+- Searching codebase... no JWT implementation found
+
+Resolution: Only add-oauth is implemented. Will sync add-oauth specs only.
+\`\`\`
+
+Example 2: Both implemented
+\`\`\`text
+Conflict: <planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/api/spec.md touched by [add-rest-api, add-graphql]
+
+Checking add-rest-api (created 2026-01-10):
+- Delta adds "REST Endpoints" requirement
+- Searching codebase... found src/api/rest.ts
+
+Checking add-graphql (created 2026-01-15):
+- Delta adds "GraphQL Schema" requirement
+- Searching codebase... found src/api/graphql.ts
+
+Resolution: Both implemented. Will apply add-rest-api specs first,
+then add-graphql specs (chronological order, newer takes precedence).
+\`\`\`
+
+**Output On Success**
+
+\`\`\`markdown
+## Bulk Archive Complete
+
+Archived N changes:
+- <change-1> -> archive/<target-name-1>/
+- <change-2> -> archive/<target-name-2>/
+
+Spec sync summary:
+- N delta specs synced to main specs
+- No conflicts (or: M conflicts resolved)
+\`\`\`
+
+**Output On Partial Success**
+
+\`\`\`markdown
+## Bulk Archive Complete (partial)
+
+Archived N changes:
+- <change-1> -> archive/<target-name-1>/
+
+Skipped M changes:
+- <change-2> (user chose not to archive incomplete)
+
+Failed K changes:
+- <change-3>: Archive directory already exists
+\`\`\`
+
+**Output When No Changes**
+
+\`\`\`markdown
+## No Changes to Archive
+
+No active changes found. Create a new change to get started.
+\`\`\`
+
+**Guardrails**
+- Allow any number of changes (1+ is fine, 2+ is the typical use case)
+- Always prompt for selection, never auto-select
+- Detect spec conflicts early and resolve by checking codebase
+- When both changes are implemented, apply specs in chronological order
+- Skip spec sync only when implementation is missing (warn user)
+- Show clear per-change status before confirming
+- Use single confirmation for entire batch
+- Never archive after the user cancels the confirmation — a cancelled batch archives nothing
+- Track and report all outcomes (success/skip/fail)
+- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive
+- Archive directory target uses current date: YYYY-MM-DD-<name>; a name that already starts with a \`YYYY-MM-DD-\` prefix is used as-is (never stack a second date)
+- If archive target exists, fail that change but continue with others
+- If sync is requested, run the \`openspec-sync-specs\` workflow inline (agent-driven) for each change with included delta specs
+- Carry the per-delta \`includedDeltas\` and \`excludedDeltas\` decisions into execution; sync and verify only included deltas
+- Report every excluded delta as \`sync skipped\` without treating the archive itself as skipped
+- Never archive a change while a spec sync is still in flight — run the sync inline and verify main specs at \`<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability-path>/spec.md\` before moving \`changeRoot\`
+- Fetch archive inputs once per selected root before spec inspection or moves
+- Fetch all required specs-rule snapshots before the batch's first main-spec write or move
+- A failed archive-inputs lookup never blocks the batch; it proceeds with no context or guidance
+- A failed specs instruction lookup stops the whole batch atomically
+- Changes without concrete \`artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths\` continue without spec sync
+- Apply relevant runtime context across the batch and report conflicts
+- Operation guidance remains advisory; consider every entry and explain rejected advice
+- Keep runtime inputs, conflict analysis, CLI-derived values, and artifact rules separate
+- Artifact rules constrain only written specs
+- Never copy runtime input or artifact-rule text verbatim into output files`,
         license: 'MIT',
         compatibility: 'Requires openspec CLI.',
         metadata: { author: 'openspec', version: '1.0' },
@@ -252,243 +341,334 @@ export function getOpsxBulkArchiveCommandTemplate() {
         description: 'Archive multiple completed changes at once',
         category: 'Workflow',
         tags: ['workflow', 'archive', 'experimental', 'bulk'],
-        content: `Archive multiple completed changes in a single operation.
-
-This skill allows you to batch-archive changes, handling spec conflicts intelligently by checking the codebase to determine what's actually implemented.
-
-${STORE_SELECTION_GUIDANCE}
-
-**Input**: None required (prompts for selection)
-
-**Steps**
-
-1. **Get active changes**
-
-   Run \`openspec list --json\` to get all active changes.
-
-   If no active changes exist, inform user and stop.
-
-2. **Prompt for change selection**
-
-   ${PROMPT_MULTI_SELECT_CHANGES}
-   - Show each change with its schema
-   - Include an option for "All changes"
-   - Allow any number of selections (1+ works, 2+ is the typical use case)
-
-   **IMPORTANT**: Do NOT auto-select. Always let the user choose.
-
-3. **Batch validation - gather status for all selected changes**
-
-   For each selected change, collect:
-
-   a. **Artifact status** - Run \`openspec status --change "<name>" --json\`
-      - Parse \`schemaName\`, \`artifacts\`, \`planningHome\`, \`changeRoot\`, \`artifactPaths\`, and \`actionContext\`
-      - Note which artifacts are \`done\` vs other states
-
-   b. **Task completion** - Read \`artifactPaths.tasks.existingOutputPaths\` from status JSON
-      - Count \`- [ ]\` (incomplete) vs \`- [x]\` (complete)
-      - If no tasks file exists, note as "No tasks"
-
-   c. **Delta specs** - Check \`artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths\` from status JSON
-      - List which capability specs exist
-      - For each, extract requirement names (lines matching \`### Requirement: <name>\`)
-
-4. **Detect spec conflicts**
-
-   Build a map of \`capability -> [changes that touch it]\`:
-
-   \`\`\`
-   auth -> [change-a, change-b]  <- CONFLICT (2+ changes)
-   api  -> [change-c]            <- OK (only 1 change)
-   \`\`\`
-
-   A conflict exists when 2+ selected changes have delta specs for the same capability.
-
-5. **Resolve conflicts agentically**
-
-   **For each conflict**, investigate the codebase:
-
-   a. **Read the delta specs** from each conflicting change to understand what each claims to add/modify
-
-   b. **Search the codebase** for implementation evidence:
-      - Look for code implementing requirements from each delta spec
-      - Check for related files, functions, or tests
-
-   c. **Determine resolution**:
-      - If only one change is actually implemented -> sync that one's specs
-      - If both implemented -> apply in chronological order (older first, newer overwrites)
-      - If neither implemented -> skip spec sync, warn user
-
-   d. **Record resolution** for each conflict:
-      - Which change's specs to apply
-      - In what order (if both)
-      - Rationale (what was found in codebase)
-
-6. **Show consolidated status table**
-
-   Display a table summarizing all changes:
-
-   \`\`\`
-   | Change              | Artifacts | Tasks | Specs   | Conflicts | Status |
-   |---------------------|-----------|-------|---------|-----------|--------|
-   | schema-management   | Done      | 5/5   | 2 delta | None      | Ready  |
-   | project-config      | Done      | 3/3   | 1 delta | None      | Ready  |
-   | add-oauth           | Done      | 4/4   | 1 delta | auth (!)  | Ready* |
-   | add-verify-skill    | 1 left    | 2/5   | None    | None      | Warn   |
-   \`\`\`
-
-   For conflicts, show the resolution:
-   \`\`\`
-   * Conflict resolution:
-     - auth spec: Will apply add-oauth then add-jwt (both implemented, chronological order)
-   \`\`\`
-
-   For incomplete changes, show warnings:
-   \`\`\`
-   Warnings:
-   - add-verify-skill: 1 incomplete artifact, 3 incomplete tasks
-   \`\`\`
-
-7. **Confirm batch operation**
-
-   ${PROMPT_CONFIRM}
-
-   - "Archive N changes?" with options based on status
-   - Options might include:
-     - "Archive all N changes"
-     - "Archive only N ready changes (skip incomplete)"
-     - "Cancel"
-
-   If there are incomplete changes, make clear they'll be archived with warnings.
-
-8. **Execute archive for each confirmed change**
-
-   Process changes in the determined order (respecting conflict resolution):
-
-   a. **Sync specs** if delta specs exist:
-      - Use the openspec-sync-specs approach (agent-driven intelligent merge)
-      - For conflicts, apply in resolved order
-      - Track if sync was done
-
-   b. **Perform the archive**:
-      \`\`\`bash
-      mkdir -p "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive"
-      mv "<changeRoot>" "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>"
-      \`\`\`
-
-   c. **Track outcome** for each change:
-      - Success: archived successfully
-      - Failed: error during archive (record error)
-      - Skipped: user chose not to archive (if applicable)
-
-9. **Display summary**
-
-   Show final results:
-
-   \`\`\`
-   ## Bulk Archive Complete
-
-   Archived 3 changes:
-   - schema-management-cli -> archive/2026-01-19-schema-management-cli/
-   - project-config -> archive/2026-01-19-project-config/
-   - add-oauth -> archive/2026-01-19-add-oauth/
-
-   Skipped 1 change:
-   - add-verify-skill (user chose not to archive incomplete)
-
-   Spec sync summary:
-   - 4 delta specs synced to main specs
-   - 1 conflict resolved (auth: applied both in chronological order)
-   \`\`\`
-
-   If any failures:
-   \`\`\`
-   Failed 1 change:
-   - some-change: Archive directory already exists
-   \`\`\`
-
-**Conflict Resolution Examples**
-
-Example 1: Only one implemented
-\`\`\`
-Conflict: specs/auth/spec.md touched by [add-oauth, add-jwt]
-
-Checking add-oauth:
-- Delta adds "OAuth Provider Integration" requirement
-- Searching codebase... found src/auth/oauth.ts implementing OAuth flow
-
-Checking add-jwt:
-- Delta adds "JWT Token Handling" requirement
-- Searching codebase... no JWT implementation found
-
-Resolution: Only add-oauth is implemented. Will sync add-oauth specs only.
-\`\`\`
-
-Example 2: Both implemented
-\`\`\`
-Conflict: specs/api/spec.md touched by [add-rest-api, add-graphql]
-
-Checking add-rest-api (created 2026-01-10):
-- Delta adds "REST Endpoints" requirement
-- Searching codebase... found src/api/rest.ts
-
-Checking add-graphql (created 2026-01-15):
-- Delta adds "GraphQL Schema" requirement
-- Searching codebase... found src/api/graphql.ts
-
-Resolution: Both implemented. Will apply add-rest-api specs first,
-then add-graphql specs (chronological order, newer takes precedence).
-\`\`\`
-
-**Output On Success**
-
-\`\`\`
-## Bulk Archive Complete
-
-Archived N changes:
-- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/
-- <change-2> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-2>/
-
-Spec sync summary:
-- N delta specs synced to main specs
-- No conflicts (or: M conflicts resolved)
-\`\`\`
-
-**Output On Partial Success**
-
-\`\`\`
-## Bulk Archive Complete (partial)
-
-Archived N changes:
-- <change-1> -> archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<change-1>/
-
-Skipped M changes:
-- <change-2> (user chose not to archive incomplete)
-
-Failed K changes:
-- <change-3>: Archive directory already exists
-\`\`\`
-
-**Output When No Changes**
-
-\`\`\`
-## No Changes to Archive
-
-No active changes found. Create a new change to get started.
-\`\`\`
-
-**Guardrails**
-- Allow any number of changes (1+ is fine, 2+ is the typical use case)
-- Always prompt for selection, never auto-select
-- Detect spec conflicts early and resolve by checking codebase
-- When both changes are implemented, apply specs in chronological order
-- Skip spec sync only when implementation is missing (warn user)
-- Show clear per-change status before confirming
-- Use single confirmation for entire batch
-- Track and report all outcomes (success/skip/fail)
-- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive
-- Archive directory target uses current date: YYYY-MM-DD-<name>
-- If archive target exists, fail that change but continue with others`
+        content: `Archive multiple completed changes in a single operation.
+
+This skill allows you to batch-archive changes, handling spec conflicts intelligently by checking the codebase to determine what's actually implemented.
+
+${STORE_SELECTION_GUIDANCE}
+
+\`<capability-path>\` is the spec directory relative to \`specs/\` (for example, \`user-auth\` or \`identity/user-auth\`). Preserve the full path from each delta spec when resolving its main spec.
+
+**Input**: None required (prompts for selection)
+
+**Steps**
+
+1. **Get active changes**
+
+   Run \`openspec list --json\` to get all active changes.
+
+   If no active changes exist, inform user and stop.
+
+2. **Prompt for change selection**
+
+   Ask the user to choose changes (multi-select):
+   - Show each change with its schema
+   - Include an option for "All changes"
+   - Allow any number of selections (1+ works, 2+ is the typical use case)
+
+   **IMPORTANT**: Do NOT auto-select. Always let the user choose.
+
+   **Load current archive inputs once for the selected root before batch validation:**
+
+   Choose one selected change from this root and run
+   \`openspec instructions archive --change "<selected-change>" --json\` with the
+   same selected-root flags. This lookup is advisory and optional: it only supplies
+   extra prompt inputs, so it must never block the batch. If it fails or returns
+   invalid JSON — for example on an older CLI that does not support this command
+   yet — continue the batch with no context and no operation guidance. Do not
+   report an error and do not stop.
+
+   A valid response may omit \`context\` and \`operationGuidance\`. Treat
+   \`context\` as a required prompt-level input across the batch: read and consider
+   it, and apply relevant project facts, conventions, and constraints. Treat
+   \`operationGuidance\` as optional additive advice: read and consider every
+   entry, and follow entries that are applicable and compatible with the built-in
+   batch workflow.
+
+   Keep both fields separate from conflict analysis, explicit user choices,
+   resolved paths, CLI checks, and command contracts. If context conflicts with one
+   of those controlling inputs, report the conflict and preserve the controlling
+   value. If guidance is inapplicable or conflicts with a controlling input, do not
+   follow it and explain why. Do not infer skipped prompts, replacement paths, or
+   flags from either field, and do not copy their text verbatim into specs, changes,
+   or summaries. These are prompt-level behavior contracts, not enforceable checks.
+
+3. **Batch validation - gather status for all selected changes**
+
+   For each selected change, collect:
+
+   a. **Artifact status** - Run \`openspec status --change "<name>" --json\`
+      - Parse \`schemaName\`, \`artifacts\`, \`planningHome\`, \`changeRoot\`, \`artifactPaths\`, and \`actionContext\`
+      - Note which artifacts are \`done\` vs other states
+
+   b. **Task completion** - Read \`artifactPaths.tasks.existingOutputPaths\` from status JSON
+      - Count \`- [ ]\` (incomplete) vs \`- [x]\` (complete)
+      - If no tasks file exists, note as "No tasks"
+
+   c. **Delta specs** - Check \`artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths\` from status JSON
+      - List which capability specs exist
+      - For each, extract requirement names (lines matching \`### Requirement: <name>\`)
+      - Treat this list as the only delta-spec source. If the \`specs\` entry is
+        missing or the list is empty, perform no spec sync or specs-instruction
+        lookup for that change; do not infer deltas from unrelated artifacts.
+      - Evaluate this independently for every change, including mixed-schema
+        batches where some schemas have no \`specs\` artifact.
+
+4. **Detect spec conflicts**
+
+   Build a map keyed by \`<capability-path>\`, the exact path relative to \`specs/\`:
+
+   \`\`\`text
+   identity/user-auth -> [change-a, change-b]  <- CONFLICT (2+ changes)
+   billing/user-auth  -> [change-c]            <- OK (different full path)
+   \`\`\`
+
+   A conflict exists when 2+ selected changes have delta specs for the exact same \`<capability-path>\`.
+
+5. **Resolve conflicts agentically**
+
+   **For each conflict**, investigate the codebase:
+
+   a. **Read the delta specs** from each conflicting change to understand what each claims to add/modify
+
+   b. **Search the codebase** for implementation evidence:
+      - Look for code implementing requirements from each delta spec
+      - Check for related files, functions, or tests
+
+   c. **Determine resolution**:
+      - If only one change is actually implemented -> sync that one's specs
+      - If both implemented -> apply in chronological order (older first, newer overwrites)
+      - If neither implemented -> skip spec sync, warn user
+
+   d. **Record resolution** for each conflict:
+      - An inclusion or exclusion decision for every delta spec, keyed by change and \`<capability-path>\`
+      - Which included delta specs to apply and in what order
+      - Which delta specs to exclude from sync because their implementation is missing
+      - Rationale (what was found in codebase)
+
+6. **Show consolidated status table**
+
+   Display a table summarizing all changes:
+
+   \`\`\`markdown
+   | Change              | Artifacts | Tasks | Specs   | Conflicts | Status |
+   |---------------------|-----------|-------|---------|-----------|--------|
+   | schema-management   | Done      | 5/5   | 2 delta | None      | Ready  |
+   | project-config      | Done      | 3/3   | 1 delta | None      | Ready  |
+   | add-oauth           | Done      | 4/4   | 1 delta | identity/user-auth (!) | Ready* |
+   | add-verify-skill    | 1 left    | 2/5   | None    | None      | Warn   |
+   \`\`\`
+
+   For conflicts, show the resolution:
+   \`\`\`text
+   * Conflict resolution:
+     - identity/user-auth spec: Will apply add-oauth then add-jwt (both implemented, chronological order)
+   \`\`\`
+
+   For incomplete changes, show warnings:
+   \`\`\`text
+   Warnings:
+   - add-verify-skill: 1 incomplete artifact, 3 incomplete tasks
+   \`\`\`
+
+7. **Confirm batch operation**
+
+   Ask the user a single confirmation question:
+
+   - "Archive N changes?" with options based on status
+   - Options might include:
+     - "Archive all N changes"
+     - "Archive only N ready changes (skip incomplete)"
+     - "Cancel"
+
+   If there are incomplete changes, make clear they'll be archived with warnings.
+
+   Route on the answer by intent, not by exact label — you wrote these labels,
+   so match what the user picked rather than the wording above:
+   - "Cancel" — stop, do not archive. Report that nothing was archived and skip the remaining steps.
+   - The archive-everything option — proceed with every selected change
+   - The ready-only option — proceed with only the changes the step 6 table marks \`Ready\` or \`Ready*\`, and record the rest as Skipped in step 8d. If a \`Ready*\` change's conflict partner is skipped, re-derive that conflict's resolution using only the changes being archived.
+   - Anything else — ask again rather than archiving
+
+   Before step 8 writes the first main spec or moves any change, fetch every
+   required specs-rule snapshot for the confirmed batch. For each change that will
+   sync concrete \`artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths\`, run
+   \`openspec instructions specs --change "<name>" --json\` exactly once with the
+   same selected-root flags. Obtain all snapshots before the first write or move.
+   If any lookup exits non-zero or returns invalid artifact-instruction JSON,
+   identify the affected change, report the error, and stop the whole batch before
+   any main-spec write or change move. Do not treat lookup failure as omitted
+   rules. A valid response without \`rules\` is the no-rules case.
+
+8. **Execute archive for each confirmed change**
+
+   Before processing, carry the recorded decisions from step 5 (after any step 7 re-derivation) into two per-delta sets:
+   - \`includedDeltas\`: all non-conflicting delta specs from confirmed changes plus conflict deltas selected for sync
+   - \`excludedDeltas\`: conflict deltas from confirmed changes excluded because their implementation is missing
+   - A single change can have both included and excluded delta specs. Keep the decision per delta; do not collapse it into a per-change sync flag.
+
+   Process changes in the determined order (respecting conflict resolution):
+
+   a. **Sync included delta specs**:
+      - Run the \`/opsx:sync\` workflow inline (agent-driven intelligent merge) only for changes with entries in \`includedDeltas\`, passing only the included delta paths and explicitly instructing it to ignore that change's \`excludedDeltas\`. Wait for it to finish.
+      - For conflicts, apply in resolved order.
+      - Pass that change's fetched specs-rule snapshot into inline sync; inline
+        sync must reuse it without fetching instructions again
+      - Apply artifact rules only to main specs produced by that change. They do
+        not change conflict resolution, archive behavior, or CLI contracts, and
+        their text is not copied into an output file
+      - Do not delegate to a background task — step 8c would move \`changeRoot\` out from under a sync that is still reading it.
+      - If a change has no included delta specs, do not run the sync workflow for it.
+
+   b. **Verify included delta specs before moving changeRoot**:
+      - Re-run the comparison only for delta specs in \`includedDeltas\` against main spec at \`<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability-path>/spec.md\` (use the store-aware \`planningHome.root\` from step 3 status JSON, not a hardcoded repo path).
+      - Verify that main specs are updated:
+        - ADDED requirements present
+        - MODIFIED requirements carrying scenario and description changes named in the delta, with their other scenarios intact
+        - REMOVED requirements gone — and where this sync retired a capability (removed its last requirement, leaving \`## Requirements\` empty), its main spec deleted rather than left empty; a spec the sync deliberately kept and reported is also a match
+        - RENAMED requirements present under the new name and absent under the old one
+      - Do not verify delta specs in \`excludedDeltas\`; they are intentionally left unsynced.
+      - If sync failed or any capability does not match verification, report what differs and fail/skip moving that change's \`changeRoot\` — do not archive that change. \`changeRoot\` remains intact.
+
+   c. **Perform the archive**:
+
+      Target name: use the change name as-is when it already starts with a \`YYYY-MM-DD-\` prefix; otherwise prepend the current date as \`YYYY-MM-DD-<name>\` (same rule as \`openspec archive\`).
+
+      \`\`\`bash
+      mkdir -p "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive"
+      mv "<changeRoot>" "<planningHome.changesDir>/archive/<target-name>"
+      \`\`\`
+
+   d. **Track outcome** for each change:
+      - Success: archived successfully
+      - Failed: error during archive or spec verification (record error)
+      - Skipped: user chose not to archive (if applicable)
+      - Sync skipped: for every delta in \`excludedDeltas\`, report \`sync skipped\` with the change, \`<capability-path>\`, and recorded reason. This is distinct from skipping the archive.
+
+9. **Display summary**
+
+   Show final results:
+
+   \`\`\`markdown
+   ## Bulk Archive Complete
+
+   Archived 3 changes:
+   - schema-management-cli -> archive/2026-01-19-schema-management-cli/
+   - project-config -> archive/2026-01-19-project-config/
+   - add-oauth -> archive/2026-01-19-add-oauth/
+
+   Skipped 1 change:
+   - add-verify-skill (user chose not to archive incomplete)
+
+   Spec sync summary:
+   - 4 delta specs synced to main specs
+   - 1 delta spec sync skipped (add-jwt, identity/user-auth: implementation not found)
+   - 1 conflict resolved (identity/user-auth: synced add-oauth, skipped add-jwt)
+   \`\`\`
+
+   If any failures:
+   \`\`\`text
+   Failed 1 change:
+   - some-change: Archive directory already exists
+   \`\`\`
+
+**Conflict Resolution Examples**
+
+Example 1: Only one implemented
+\`\`\`text
+Conflict: <planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/auth/spec.md touched by [add-oauth, add-jwt]
+
+Checking add-oauth:
+- Delta adds "OAuth Provider Integration" requirement
+- Searching codebase... found src/auth/oauth.ts implementing OAuth flow
+
+Checking add-jwt:
+- Delta adds "JWT Token Handling" requirement
+- Searching codebase... no JWT implementation found
+
+Resolution: Only add-oauth is implemented. Will sync add-oauth specs only.
+\`\`\`
+
+Example 2: Both implemented
+\`\`\`text
+Conflict: <planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/api/spec.md touched by [add-rest-api, add-graphql]
+
+Checking add-rest-api (created 2026-01-10):
+- Delta adds "REST Endpoints" requirement
+- Searching codebase... found src/api/rest.ts
+
+Checking add-graphql (created 2026-01-15):
+- Delta adds "GraphQL Schema" requirement
+- Searching codebase... found src/api/graphql.ts
+
+Resolution: Both implemented. Will apply add-rest-api specs first,
+then add-graphql specs (chronological order, newer takes precedence).
+\`\`\`
+
+**Output On Success**
+
+\`\`\`markdown
+## Bulk Archive Complete
+
+Archived N changes:
+- <change-1> -> archive/<target-name-1>/
+- <change-2> -> archive/<target-name-2>/
+
+Spec sync summary:
+- N delta specs synced to main specs
+- No conflicts (or: M conflicts resolved)
+\`\`\`
+
+**Output On Partial Success**
+
+\`\`\`markdown
+## Bulk Archive Complete (partial)
+
+Archived N changes:
+- <change-1> -> archive/<target-name-1>/
+
+Skipped M changes:
+- <change-2> (user chose not to archive incomplete)
+
+Failed K changes:
+- <change-3>: Archive directory already exists
+\`\`\`
+
+**Output When No Changes**
+
+\`\`\`markdown
+## No Changes to Archive
+
+No active changes found. Create a new change to get started.
+\`\`\`
+
+**Guardrails**
+- Allow any number of changes (1+ is fine, 2+ is the typical use case)
+- Always prompt for selection, never auto-select
+- Detect spec conflicts early and resolve by checking codebase
+- When both changes are implemented, apply specs in chronological order
+- Skip spec sync only when implementation is missing (warn user)
+- Show clear per-change status before confirming
+- Use single confirmation for entire batch
+- Never archive after the user cancels the confirmation — a cancelled batch archives nothing
+- Track and report all outcomes (success/skip/fail)
+- Preserve .openspec.yaml when moving to archive
+- Archive directory target uses current date: YYYY-MM-DD-<name>; a name that already starts with a \`YYYY-MM-DD-\` prefix is used as-is (never stack a second date)
+- If archive target exists, fail that change but continue with others
+- If sync is requested, run the \`/opsx:sync\` workflow inline (agent-driven) for each change with included delta specs
+- Carry the per-delta \`includedDeltas\` and \`excludedDeltas\` decisions into execution; sync and verify only included deltas
+- Report every excluded delta as \`sync skipped\` without treating the archive itself as skipped
+- Never archive a change while a spec sync is still in flight — run the sync inline and verify main specs at \`<planningHome.root>/openspec/specs/<capability-path>/spec.md\` before moving \`changeRoot\`
+- Fetch archive inputs once per selected root before spec inspection or moves
+- Fetch all required specs-rule snapshots before the batch's first main-spec write or move
+- A failed archive-inputs lookup never blocks the batch; it proceeds with no context or guidance
+- A failed specs instruction lookup stops the whole batch atomically
+- Changes without concrete \`artifactPaths.specs.existingOutputPaths\` continue without spec sync
+- Apply relevant runtime context across the batch and report conflicts
+- Operation guidance remains advisory; consider every entry and explain rejected advice
+- Keep runtime inputs, conflict analysis, CLI-derived values, and artifact rules separate
+- Artifact rules constrain only written specs
+- Never copy runtime input or artifact-rule text verbatim into output files`
     };
 }
 //# sourceMappingURL=bulk-archive-change.js.map