@codemcp/workflows-core 4.5.0 → 4.6.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/beads-integration.d.ts +62 -0
- package/dist/beads-integration.js +386 -0
- package/dist/beads-integration.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/conversation-manager.js +10 -0
- package/dist/conversation-manager.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/index.d.ts +2 -0
- package/dist/index.js +2 -0
- package/dist/index.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/instruction-generator.d.ts +8 -4
- package/dist/instruction-generator.js +61 -16
- package/dist/instruction-generator.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/plan-manager.d.ts +6 -0
- package/dist/plan-manager.js +21 -2
- package/dist/plan-manager.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/system-prompt-generator.js +3 -1
- package/dist/system-prompt-generator.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/task-backend.d.ts +34 -0
- package/dist/task-backend.js +154 -0
- package/dist/task-backend.js.map +1 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/resources/workflows/bugfix.yaml +5 -5
- package/resources/workflows/business-analysis.yaml +19 -19
- package/resources/workflows/epcc.yaml +6 -14
- package/resources/workflows/greenfield.yaml +9 -9
- package/resources/workflows/minor.yaml +6 -6
- package/resources/workflows/tdd.yaml +11 -11
- package/resources/workflows/waterfall.yaml +6 -6
|
@@ -40,10 +40,10 @@ states:
|
|
|
40
40
|
IMPORTANT: In this phase, do not read the documents yet!
|
|
41
41
|
|
|
42
42
|
**Step 2: Create Document Processing Tasks**
|
|
43
|
-
For each gathered document,
|
|
43
|
+
For each gathered document, create a processing task:
|
|
44
44
|
"- [ ] Summarize [document-name] using structured chapter-by-chapter approach"
|
|
45
45
|
|
|
46
|
-
Update
|
|
46
|
+
Update task progress and create document processing tasks.
|
|
47
47
|
transitions:
|
|
48
48
|
- trigger: 'discovery_complete'
|
|
49
49
|
to: 'documents_consolidation'
|
|
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
61
61
|
2. Maintain original hierarchical structure
|
|
62
62
|
3. Condense content while preserving key information
|
|
63
63
|
4. Create [document-name]-processed.md file
|
|
64
|
-
5.
|
|
64
|
+
5. Update task progress as complete
|
|
65
65
|
|
|
66
66
|
**Summarization Guidelines:**
|
|
67
67
|
- Create structured summary based exclusively on source document information
|
|
@@ -97,10 +97,10 @@ states:
|
|
|
97
97
|
- Business rules and policies
|
|
98
98
|
|
|
99
99
|
**Step 2: Create Business Analysis Tasks**
|
|
100
|
-
For each business-relevant chapter identified,
|
|
101
|
-
"- [ ]
|
|
100
|
+
For each business-relevant chapter identified, create a task:
|
|
101
|
+
"- [ ] Extract business capabilities from [chapter-name]"
|
|
102
102
|
|
|
103
|
-
IMPORTANT: You MUST
|
|
103
|
+
IMPORTANT: You MUST create these tasks before proceeding.
|
|
104
104
|
|
|
105
105
|
**Step 3: Execute Business Analysis Tasks**
|
|
106
106
|
For each business analysis task:
|
|
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
111
111
|
- Who (roles/actors) performs the work
|
|
112
112
|
- Why (business value/purpose) it exists
|
|
113
113
|
3. Create detailed business summary emphasizing WHAT, WHY, WHO (not HOW)
|
|
114
|
-
4.
|
|
114
|
+
4. Update task progress as complete
|
|
115
115
|
|
|
116
116
|
**Step 4: Update Bibliography**
|
|
117
117
|
Update BIBLIOGRAPHY.md with business terms found during detailed analysis:
|
|
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
252
252
|
- business-analysis/business-actors/ (folder for details)
|
|
253
253
|
|
|
254
254
|
Begin analyzing processed documents to identify business capabilities and domains.
|
|
255
|
-
|
|
255
|
+
Update task progress as you complete business analysis work.
|
|
256
256
|
transition_reason: 'Business content analysis complete, ready for capability identification'
|
|
257
257
|
|
|
258
258
|
capability_identification:
|
|
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
299
299
|
- trigger: 'capabilities_identified'
|
|
300
300
|
to: 'capability_decomposition'
|
|
301
301
|
additional_instructions: >
|
|
302
|
-
For each identified capability,
|
|
302
|
+
For each identified capability, create decomposition tasks:
|
|
303
303
|
"- [ ] Decompose [capability-name] into sub-capabilities using document analysis"
|
|
304
304
|
|
|
305
305
|
Begin systematic decomposition of capabilities one at a time.
|
|
@@ -362,11 +362,11 @@ states:
|
|
|
362
362
|
<!-- Key organizational units and their responsibilities -->
|
|
363
363
|
```
|
|
364
364
|
|
|
365
|
-
For each capability,
|
|
365
|
+
For each capability, create actor analysis tasks:
|
|
366
366
|
"- [ ] Analyze business actors for [capability-name] using document analysis"
|
|
367
367
|
|
|
368
368
|
Begin systematic actor analysis one capability at a time.
|
|
369
|
-
|
|
369
|
+
Update task progress as you complete decomposition work.
|
|
370
370
|
transition_reason: 'Capability decomposition complete, ready for actor analysis'
|
|
371
371
|
|
|
372
372
|
actor_analysis:
|
|
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
375
375
|
You are in the actor analysis phase. Identify WHO performs each capability using Business Capability Modeling approach.
|
|
376
376
|
|
|
377
377
|
**Step 1: Select Next Capability for Actor Analysis**
|
|
378
|
-
From
|
|
378
|
+
From current tasks, select the next capability to analyze for business actors.
|
|
379
379
|
|
|
380
380
|
**Step 2: Analyze Documents for Business Actors**
|
|
381
381
|
Review processed documents to identify:
|
|
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
403
403
|
|
|
404
404
|
**Step 5: Refine and Document**
|
|
405
405
|
Update business-actors.md with capability-actor mappings.
|
|
406
|
-
|
|
406
|
+
Update task progress as complete.
|
|
407
407
|
|
|
408
408
|
Focus on capability ownership and role accountability, not just organizational structure.
|
|
409
409
|
|
|
@@ -429,11 +429,11 @@ states:
|
|
|
429
429
|
<!-- How processes relate to the actors identified -->
|
|
430
430
|
```
|
|
431
431
|
|
|
432
|
-
For each capability,
|
|
432
|
+
For each capability, create process analysis tasks:
|
|
433
433
|
"- [ ] Analyze business processes for [capability-name] using document analysis and actor context"
|
|
434
434
|
|
|
435
435
|
Begin systematic process analysis one capability at a time.
|
|
436
|
-
|
|
436
|
+
Update task progress as you complete actor analysis work.
|
|
437
437
|
transition_reason: 'Actor analysis complete, ready for process analysis'
|
|
438
438
|
|
|
439
439
|
process_analysis:
|
|
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
442
442
|
You are in the process analysis phase. Create process analysis tasks for systematic processing.
|
|
443
443
|
|
|
444
444
|
**Step 1: Select Next Process Analysis Task**
|
|
445
|
-
From
|
|
445
|
+
From current process analysis tasks, select the next capability to process.
|
|
446
446
|
|
|
447
447
|
**Step 2: Analyze Documents for Process Information**
|
|
448
448
|
Review processed documents for process information:
|
|
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
470
470
|
|
|
471
471
|
**Step 5: Refine and Document**
|
|
472
472
|
Update business-processes-detailed.md and detail folder.
|
|
473
|
-
|
|
473
|
+
Update task progress as complete.
|
|
474
474
|
|
|
475
475
|
Process one capability's processes at a time.
|
|
476
476
|
transitions:
|
|
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
559
559
|
- All three formats (comprehensive)"
|
|
560
560
|
|
|
561
561
|
Begin creating consolidated summaries and illustrations.
|
|
562
|
-
|
|
562
|
+
Update task progress as you complete consistency work.
|
|
563
563
|
transition_reason: 'Consistency validation complete, ready for final summary creation'
|
|
564
564
|
|
|
565
565
|
summary:
|
|
@@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
620
620
|
- Navigation guides and cross-references
|
|
621
621
|
|
|
622
622
|
The analysis provides complete business architecture understanding using Business Capability Modeling methodology.
|
|
623
|
-
|
|
623
|
+
Update task progress as you complete summary work.
|
|
624
624
|
transition_reason: 'Summary creation complete, analysis finished'
|
|
625
625
|
|
|
626
626
|
analysis_complete:
|
|
@@ -29,24 +29,16 @@ states:
|
|
|
29
29
|
default_instructions: |
|
|
30
30
|
You are in the exploration phase. Research the codebase, understand existing patterns, and gather context about the problem space.
|
|
31
31
|
If you are not certain about conventions or rules, ask the user about them.
|
|
32
|
-
Read relevant files and documentation. If $REQUIREMENTS_DOC exists, understand and document requirements there, otherwise document them in
|
|
32
|
+
Read relevant files and documentation. If $REQUIREMENTS_DOC exists, understand and document requirements there, otherwise document them in your task management system. Don't write code yet - focus on understanding. Document your findings and create tasks as needed.
|
|
33
33
|
transitions:
|
|
34
34
|
- trigger: 'exploration_complete'
|
|
35
35
|
to: 'plan'
|
|
36
36
|
additional_instructions: 'Present the plan to the user, describing the impact of the changes.'
|
|
37
37
|
transition_reason: 'Sufficient understanding gained, ready to create implementation plan'
|
|
38
38
|
|
|
39
|
-
- trigger: 'abandon_feature'
|
|
40
|
-
to: 'explore'
|
|
41
|
-
instructions: >
|
|
42
|
-
Feature development abandoned. Return to exploration state for new tasks.
|
|
43
|
-
The plan file will remain for future reference if needed.
|
|
44
|
-
additional_instructions: 'Feature development abandoned. Clean up any work in progress and prepare for new tasks.'
|
|
45
|
-
transition_reason: 'User decided to abandon current feature development'
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
39
|
plan:
|
|
48
40
|
description: 'Planning phase - creating a detailed implementation strategy'
|
|
49
|
-
default_instructions: 'You are in the planning phase. Create a detailed implementation strategy based on your exploration. If $REQUIREMENTS_DOC exists, base your strategy on requirements from $REQUIREMENTS_DOC, otherwise use
|
|
41
|
+
default_instructions: 'You are in the planning phase. Create a detailed implementation strategy based on your exploration. If $REQUIREMENTS_DOC exists, base your strategy on requirements from $REQUIREMENTS_DOC, otherwise use existing task context. Break down the work into specific, actionable tasks. Consider edge cases, dependencies, and potential challenges. If it impacts the general architecture and $ARCHITECTURE_DOC exists, document this in $ARCHITECTURE_DOC, otherwise create tasks to track architectural decisions. If $DESIGN_DOC exists, make sure to adhere to the design in $DESIGN_DOC. Document the planning work thoroughly and create implementation tasks as needed.'
|
|
50
42
|
transitions:
|
|
51
43
|
- trigger: 'need_more_exploration'
|
|
52
44
|
to: 'explore'
|
|
@@ -66,13 +58,13 @@ states:
|
|
|
66
58
|
to: 'explore'
|
|
67
59
|
instructions: >
|
|
68
60
|
Feature development abandoned during planning. Return to exploration state for new tasks.
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
61
|
+
Task history will remain for future reference.
|
|
70
62
|
additional_instructions: 'Feature development abandoned during planning. Clean up any planning work and prepare for new tasks.'
|
|
71
63
|
transition_reason: 'User decided to abandon feature during planning phase'
|
|
72
64
|
|
|
73
65
|
code:
|
|
74
66
|
description: 'Implementation phase - writing and building the solution'
|
|
75
|
-
default_instructions: '
|
|
67
|
+
default_instructions: 'Follow your plan and if $DESIGN_DOC exists, follow the design from $DESIGN_DOC to build the solution. If $ARCHITECTURE_DOC exists, build according to the architecture in $ARCHITECTURE_DOC. If $REQUIREMENTS_DOC exists, ensure requirements from $REQUIREMENTS_DOC are met, otherwise ensure existing requirements are met based on your task context. Write clean, well-structured code with proper error handling. Prevent regression by building, linting and executing existing tests. Stay flexible and adapt the plan as you learn more during implementation. Update task progress and create new tasks as needed for implementation work.'
|
|
76
68
|
transitions:
|
|
77
69
|
- trigger: 'need_replanning'
|
|
78
70
|
to: 'plan'
|
|
@@ -97,7 +89,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
97
89
|
to: 'explore'
|
|
98
90
|
instructions: >
|
|
99
91
|
Feature development abandoned during implementation. Clean up any incomplete code and return to exploration.
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
92
|
+
Task history and any completed work will remain for future reference.
|
|
101
93
|
additional_instructions: 'Clean up any incomplete code and prepare for new tasks.'
|
|
102
94
|
transition_reason: 'User decided to abandon feature during implementation'
|
|
103
95
|
|
|
@@ -141,7 +133,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
141
133
|
- Verify documentation accuracy with a final review
|
|
142
134
|
- Ensure code is ready for production/delivery
|
|
143
135
|
|
|
144
|
-
|
|
136
|
+
Update task progress and mark completed work as you finalize the feature.
|
|
145
137
|
transitions:
|
|
146
138
|
- trigger: 'need_code_changes'
|
|
147
139
|
to: 'code'
|
|
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
34
34
|
• What technologies must/cannot be used? Why?
|
|
35
35
|
• How will you measure product success?
|
|
36
36
|
• Have you validated this need with potential users?
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
37
|
+
Don't discuss technical implementation yet - focus purely on understanding the problem space and requirements. Document all findings in $REQUIREMENTS_DOC and create tasks as needed.
|
|
38
38
|
transitions:
|
|
39
39
|
- trigger: 'ideation_complete'
|
|
40
40
|
to: 'architecture'
|
|
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
49
49
|
to: 'ideation'
|
|
50
50
|
instructions: >
|
|
51
51
|
Project development abandoned. Return to ideation state for new projects.
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
52
|
+
Task history will remain for future reference if needed.
|
|
53
53
|
additional_instructions: 'Project development abandoned. Clean up any ideation work and prepare for new projects.'
|
|
54
54
|
transition_reason: 'User decided to abandon current project development'
|
|
55
55
|
|
|
@@ -76,13 +76,13 @@ states:
|
|
|
76
76
|
to: 'ideation'
|
|
77
77
|
instructions: >
|
|
78
78
|
Project development abandoned during architecture phase. Return to ideation state for new projects.
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
79
|
+
Task history and PRD will remain for future reference.
|
|
80
80
|
additional_instructions: 'Project development abandoned during architecture phase. Clean up any architecture work and prepare for new projects.'
|
|
81
81
|
transition_reason: 'User decided to abandon project during architecture phase'
|
|
82
82
|
|
|
83
83
|
plan:
|
|
84
84
|
description: 'Implementation planning phase based on established architecture'
|
|
85
|
-
default_instructions: 'You are in the planning phase. Based on your completed architecture in $ARCHITECTURE_DOC and requirements from $REQUIREMENTS_DOC, create a detailed implementation strategy. Break down the work into specific, actionable tasks considering the chosen tech stack and architectural decisions. Plan the implementation order, identify dependencies, and consider potential risks. Document the detailed design in $DESIGN_DOC and
|
|
85
|
+
default_instructions: 'You are in the planning phase. Based on your completed architecture in $ARCHITECTURE_DOC and requirements from $REQUIREMENTS_DOC, create a detailed implementation strategy. Break down the work into specific, actionable tasks considering the chosen tech stack and architectural decisions. Plan the implementation order, identify dependencies, and consider potential risks. Document the detailed design in $DESIGN_DOC and create tasks thoroughly with clear milestones for implementation work.'
|
|
86
86
|
transitions:
|
|
87
87
|
- trigger: 'need_architecture_changes'
|
|
88
88
|
to: 'architecture'
|
|
@@ -91,20 +91,20 @@ states:
|
|
|
91
91
|
|
|
92
92
|
- trigger: 'plan_complete'
|
|
93
93
|
to: 'code'
|
|
94
|
-
additional_instructions: "Implementation plan is complete! ✅ Now transition to coding phase. Read specific documentation before using the chosen libraries and frameworks. Follow the architectural patterns and tech stack decisions you've made. Modularize your code according to best practices. Stay focused on the current project scope defined in your PRD.
|
|
94
|
+
additional_instructions: "Implementation plan is complete! ✅ Now transition to coding phase. Read specific documentation before using the chosen libraries and frameworks. Follow the architectural patterns and tech stack decisions you've made. Modularize your code according to best practices. Stay focused on the current project scope defined in your PRD. Update task progress as you complete planning work."
|
|
95
95
|
transition_reason: 'Implementation plan is complete and ready for coding'
|
|
96
96
|
|
|
97
97
|
- trigger: 'abandon_project'
|
|
98
98
|
to: 'ideation'
|
|
99
99
|
instructions: >
|
|
100
100
|
Project development abandoned during planning. Return to ideation state for new projects.
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
101
|
+
Task history, PRD, and architecture documentation will remain for future reference.
|
|
102
102
|
additional_instructions: 'Project development abandoned during planning. Clean up any planning work and prepare for new projects.'
|
|
103
103
|
transition_reason: 'User decided to abandon project during planning phase'
|
|
104
104
|
|
|
105
105
|
code:
|
|
106
106
|
description: 'Implementation phase following the established plan and architecture'
|
|
107
|
-
default_instructions: '
|
|
107
|
+
default_instructions: 'Follow your plan and detailed design from $DESIGN_DOC to build the solution using the architecture from $ARCHITECTURE_DOC. Ensure all requirements from $REQUIREMENTS_DOC you are currently working on are met. Write clean, well-structured code with proper error handling. Prevent regression by building, linting, and executing existing tests. Stay flexible and adapt the plan as you learn more during implementation, but maintain alignment with your architecture decisions. Update task progress and create new tasks as needed for current phase work.'
|
|
108
108
|
transitions:
|
|
109
109
|
- trigger: 'need_replanning'
|
|
110
110
|
to: 'plan'
|
|
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
124
124
|
to: 'ideation'
|
|
125
125
|
instructions: >
|
|
126
126
|
Project development abandoned during implementation. Clean up any incomplete code and return to ideation.
|
|
127
|
-
|
|
127
|
+
Task history, PRD, architecture documentation, and any completed work will remain for future reference.
|
|
128
128
|
additional_instructions: 'Project development abandoned during implementation. Clean up any incomplete code and prepare for new projects.'
|
|
129
129
|
transition_reason: 'User decided to abandon project during implementation'
|
|
130
130
|
|
|
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
169
169
|
- Verify documentation accuracy with a final review
|
|
170
170
|
- Ensure project is ready for users and contributors
|
|
171
171
|
|
|
172
|
-
|
|
172
|
+
Update task progress and mark completed work as you finalize the project.
|
|
173
173
|
transitions:
|
|
174
174
|
- trigger: 'need_code_changes'
|
|
175
175
|
to: 'code'
|
|
@@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ states:
|
|
|
30
30
|
You are in the exploration phase for minor enhancement.
|
|
31
31
|
This phase should be efficient since it's a minor enhancement.
|
|
32
32
|
Understand the problem, analyze existing patterns, and design your approach.
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
33
|
+
Consider the scope and impact of the change. If $REQUIREMENTS_DOC exists, document requirements there, otherwise document them in your task management system. If $DESIGN_DOC exists, respect the design approach in $DESIGN_DOC.
|
|
34
|
+
Document your analysis and design decisions and create tasks as needed.
|
|
35
35
|
Focus on analysis and design only - do not write any code yet.
|
|
36
36
|
transitions:
|
|
37
37
|
- trigger: 'exploration_complete'
|
|
@@ -43,13 +43,13 @@ states:
|
|
|
43
43
|
instructions: >
|
|
44
44
|
Minor enhancement abandoned. Revert potentially made changes.
|
|
45
45
|
Return to exploration state for new tasks.
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
46
|
+
Task history will remain for future reference if needed.
|
|
47
47
|
additional_instructions: 'Minor enhancement development abandoned. Clean up any analysis work and prepare for new tasks.'
|
|
48
48
|
transition_reason: 'User decided to abandon current minor enhancement'
|
|
49
49
|
|
|
50
50
|
implement:
|
|
51
51
|
description: 'Combined implementation phase - code, test, and commit'
|
|
52
|
-
default_instructions: "
|
|
52
|
+
default_instructions: "This phase combines coding, testing, and commit preparation. If $DESIGN_DOC exists, follow your design from $DESIGN_DOC. If $REQUIREMENTS_DOC exists, ensure the relevant requirements from $REQUIREMENTS_DOC are met, otherwise ensure existing requirements are met based on your task context. Write clean, focused code for the minor enhancement. Test your changes to ensure they work correctly and don't break existing functionality. Prepare documentation and commit when ready. Update task progress as needed."
|
|
53
53
|
transitions:
|
|
54
54
|
- trigger: 'need_more_analysis'
|
|
55
55
|
to: 'explore'
|
|
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
64
64
|
to: 'explore'
|
|
65
65
|
instructions: >
|
|
66
66
|
Minor enhancement abandoned during implementation. Clean up any incomplete code and return to exploration.
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
67
|
+
Task history and any completed work will remain for future reference.
|
|
68
68
|
additional_instructions: 'Clean up any incomplete code and prepare for new tasks.'
|
|
69
69
|
transition_reason: 'User decided to abandon minor enhancement during implementation'
|
|
70
70
|
|
|
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
107
107
|
- Verify documentation accuracy with a final review
|
|
108
108
|
- Ensure minor enhancement is ready for delivery
|
|
109
109
|
|
|
110
|
-
|
|
110
|
+
Update task progress and mark completed work as you finalize the minor enhancement.
|
|
111
111
|
transitions:
|
|
112
112
|
- trigger: 'need_implementation_changes'
|
|
113
113
|
to: 'implement'
|
|
@@ -31,19 +31,19 @@ states:
|
|
|
31
31
|
Your main objective now is to gather context about what needs to be developed. Focus on the WHY and WHAT, not the HOW.
|
|
32
32
|
Research the codebase, understand existing patterns,
|
|
33
33
|
If you are not certain about conventions or rules, ask the user about them.
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
34
|
+
Read relevant files and documentation. If $REQUIREMENTS_DOC exists, understand and document requirements there, otherwise document them in your task management system.
|
|
35
|
+
Don't write code or tests yet - focus on understanding. Document your findings and create tasks as needed.
|
|
36
36
|
transitions:
|
|
37
37
|
- trigger: 'exploration_complete'
|
|
38
38
|
to: 'red'
|
|
39
|
-
additional_instructions: '
|
|
39
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Update task progress as you complete exploration work.'
|
|
40
40
|
transition_reason: 'Sufficient understanding gained, ready to start TDD cycle with failing test'
|
|
41
41
|
|
|
42
42
|
- trigger: 'abandon_feature'
|
|
43
43
|
to: 'explore'
|
|
44
44
|
instructions: >
|
|
45
45
|
Feature development abandoned. Return to exploration state for new tasks.
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
46
|
+
Task history will remain for future reference if needed.
|
|
47
47
|
additional_instructions: 'Clean up any work in progress and prepare for new tasks.'
|
|
48
48
|
transition_reason: 'User decided to abandon current feature development'
|
|
49
49
|
|
|
@@ -62,11 +62,11 @@ states:
|
|
|
62
62
|
- Is specific and focused on one aspect of the functionality
|
|
63
63
|
- Uses appropriate assertions (not assert(true) or similar meaningless checks)
|
|
64
64
|
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
65
|
+
Run the test to confirm it fails for the right reason. Document the test and update task progress as needed.
|
|
66
66
|
transitions:
|
|
67
67
|
- trigger: 'test_written_and_failing'
|
|
68
68
|
to: 'green'
|
|
69
|
-
additional_instructions: '
|
|
69
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Update task progress as you complete test writing work.'
|
|
70
70
|
transition_reason: 'Failing test successfully written and validated, ready to implement'
|
|
71
71
|
|
|
72
72
|
- trigger: 'need_more_exploration'
|
|
@@ -96,11 +96,11 @@ states:
|
|
|
96
96
|
- Implementing proper logic, not shortcuts
|
|
97
97
|
- Running the test to confirm it passes
|
|
98
98
|
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
99
|
+
Document your implementation approach and update task progress as needed.
|
|
100
100
|
transitions:
|
|
101
101
|
- trigger: 'test_passing'
|
|
102
102
|
to: 'refactor'
|
|
103
|
-
additional_instructions: '
|
|
103
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Update task progress as you complete implementation work.'
|
|
104
104
|
transition_reason: 'Test passes with proper implementation, ready for refactoring'
|
|
105
105
|
|
|
106
106
|
- trigger: 'need_different_test'
|
|
@@ -135,11 +135,11 @@ states:
|
|
|
135
135
|
- Make small, incremental improvements
|
|
136
136
|
- Stop when code is clean and no obvious improvements remain
|
|
137
137
|
|
|
138
|
-
|
|
138
|
+
Document significant refactoring decisions and update task progress as needed.
|
|
139
139
|
transitions:
|
|
140
140
|
- trigger: 'refactoring_complete'
|
|
141
141
|
to: 'red'
|
|
142
|
-
additional_instructions: '
|
|
142
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Update task progress as you complete refactoring work.'
|
|
143
143
|
transition_reason: 'Code cleanup complete, ready for next TDD cycle'
|
|
144
144
|
|
|
145
145
|
- trigger: 'need_different_approach'
|
|
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
148
148
|
|
|
149
149
|
- trigger: 'feature_complete'
|
|
150
150
|
to: 'explore'
|
|
151
|
-
additional_instructions: '
|
|
151
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Update task progress to reflect feature completion.'
|
|
152
152
|
transition_reason: 'Feature fully implemented and cleaned up, ready for new tasks'
|
|
153
153
|
|
|
154
154
|
- trigger: 'abandon_feature'
|
|
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
35
35
|
• How will you measure success? What are the acceptance criteria?
|
|
36
36
|
• What are your time, budget, technical, or regulatory constraints?
|
|
37
37
|
• What existing systems must this integrate with?
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
38
|
+
Break down their needs into specific requirements in $REQUIREMENTS_DOC. Create actionable tasks referencing those requirements.
|
|
39
39
|
transitions:
|
|
40
40
|
- trigger: 'requirements_complete'
|
|
41
41
|
to: 'design'
|
|
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
53
53
|
Review requirements from $REQUIREMENTS_DOC and design the technical solution
|
|
54
54
|
Focus on HOW to implement what's needed including architecture, technologies, data models, API design, and quality goals.
|
|
55
55
|
Clarify performance expectations and technology preferences if not already obvious from the current analysis.
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
56
|
+
Document architectural decisions in $ARCHITECTURE_DOC and detailed design in $DESIGN_DOC. Create tasks and ensure the approach is solid before implementation."
|
|
57
57
|
transitions:
|
|
58
58
|
- trigger: 'need_more_requirements'
|
|
59
59
|
to: 'requirements'
|
|
@@ -72,10 +72,10 @@ states:
|
|
|
72
72
|
implementation:
|
|
73
73
|
description: 'Building the solution according to design'
|
|
74
74
|
default_instructions: |
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
75
|
+
Follow the architecture from $ARCHITECTURE_DOC and detailed design from $DESIGN_DOC to build the solution. Before starting, clarify the approach:
|
|
76
76
|
• Should this be implemented incrementally or all at once? Any specific order of implementation?
|
|
77
77
|
• Are there high-risk parts that need extra validation or careful implementation?
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
78
|
+
Ensure requirements from $REQUIREMENTS_DOC are met. Focus on code structure, error handling, security, and maintainability. Write clean, well-documented code and include basic testing. Update task progress during implementation work.
|
|
79
79
|
transitions:
|
|
80
80
|
- trigger: 'need_design_changes'
|
|
81
81
|
to: 'design'
|
|
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
98
98
|
|
|
99
99
|
qa:
|
|
100
100
|
description: 'Quality assurance and code review'
|
|
101
|
-
default_instructions: 'You are in the quality assurance phase. Take the following specific actions: 1) Syntax Check: Run syntax checking tools or validate syntax manually, 2) Build Project: Build the project to verify it compiles without errors, 3) Run Linter: Execute linting tools to ensure code style consistency, 4) Execute Tests: Run existing tests to verify functionality. Then conduct a multi-perspective code review from security, performance, UX, maintainability, and requirement compliance perspectives. Verify implementation matches $DESIGN_DOC specifications and fulfills the targeted requirements from $REQUIREMENTS_DOC. Update
|
|
101
|
+
default_instructions: 'You are in the quality assurance phase. Take the following specific actions: 1) Syntax Check: Run syntax checking tools or validate syntax manually, 2) Build Project: Build the project to verify it compiles without errors, 3) Run Linter: Execute linting tools to ensure code style consistency, 4) Execute Tests: Run existing tests to verify functionality. Then conduct a multi-perspective code review from security, performance, UX, maintainability, and requirement compliance perspectives. Verify implementation matches $DESIGN_DOC specifications and fulfills the targeted requirements from $REQUIREMENTS_DOC. Update task progress and mark completed work during QA review.'
|
|
102
102
|
transitions:
|
|
103
103
|
- trigger: 'need_implementation_fixes'
|
|
104
104
|
to: 'implementation'
|
|
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ states:
|
|
|
177
177
|
- Verify documentation accuracy with a final review
|
|
178
178
|
- Ensure code is ready for production/delivery
|
|
179
179
|
|
|
180
|
-
|
|
180
|
+
Update task progress and mark completed work as you finalize the feature.
|
|
181
181
|
transitions:
|
|
182
182
|
- trigger: 'need_final_changes'
|
|
183
183
|
to: 'implementation'
|