@codemcp/workflows-core 3.1.22 → 3.2.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/package.json +8 -3
- package/resources/templates/architecture/arc42/arc42-template-EN.md +1077 -0
- package/resources/templates/architecture/arc42/images/01_2_iso-25010-topics-EN.drawio-2023.png +0 -0
- package/resources/templates/architecture/arc42/images/01_2_iso-25010-topics-EN.drawio.png +0 -0
- package/resources/templates/architecture/arc42/images/05_building_blocks-EN.png +0 -0
- package/resources/templates/architecture/arc42/images/08-concepts-EN.drawio.png +0 -0
- package/resources/templates/architecture/arc42/images/arc42-logo.png +0 -0
- package/resources/templates/architecture/c4.md +224 -0
- package/resources/templates/architecture/freestyle.md +53 -0
- package/resources/templates/architecture/none.md +17 -0
- package/resources/templates/design/comprehensive.md +207 -0
- package/resources/templates/design/freestyle.md +37 -0
- package/resources/templates/design/none.md +17 -0
- package/resources/templates/requirements/ears.md +90 -0
- package/resources/templates/requirements/freestyle.md +42 -0
- package/resources/templates/requirements/none.md +17 -0
- package/resources/workflows/big-bang-conversion.yaml +539 -0
- package/resources/workflows/boundary-testing.yaml +334 -0
- package/resources/workflows/bugfix.yaml +185 -0
- package/resources/workflows/business-analysis.yaml +671 -0
- package/resources/workflows/c4-analysis.yaml +485 -0
- package/resources/workflows/epcc.yaml +161 -0
- package/resources/workflows/greenfield.yaml +189 -0
- package/resources/workflows/minor.yaml +127 -0
- package/resources/workflows/posts.yaml +207 -0
- package/resources/workflows/slides.yaml +256 -0
- package/resources/workflows/tdd.yaml +157 -0
- package/resources/workflows/waterfall.yaml +195 -0
- package/.turbo/turbo-build.log +0 -4
- package/src/config-manager.ts +0 -96
- package/src/conversation-manager.ts +0 -489
- package/src/database.ts +0 -427
- package/src/file-detection-manager.ts +0 -302
- package/src/git-manager.ts +0 -64
- package/src/index.ts +0 -28
- package/src/instruction-generator.ts +0 -210
- package/src/interaction-logger.ts +0 -109
- package/src/logger.ts +0 -353
- package/src/path-validation-utils.ts +0 -261
- package/src/plan-manager.ts +0 -323
- package/src/project-docs-manager.ts +0 -523
- package/src/state-machine-loader.ts +0 -365
- package/src/state-machine-types.ts +0 -72
- package/src/state-machine.ts +0 -370
- package/src/system-prompt-generator.ts +0 -122
- package/src/template-manager.ts +0 -328
- package/src/transition-engine.ts +0 -386
- package/src/types.ts +0 -60
- package/src/workflow-manager.ts +0 -606
- package/test/unit/conversation-manager.test.ts +0 -179
- package/test/unit/custom-workflow-loading.test.ts +0 -174
- package/test/unit/directory-linking-and-extensions.test.ts +0 -338
- package/test/unit/file-linking-integration.test.ts +0 -256
- package/test/unit/git-commit-integration.test.ts +0 -91
- package/test/unit/git-manager.test.ts +0 -86
- package/test/unit/install-workflow.test.ts +0 -138
- package/test/unit/instruction-generator.test.ts +0 -247
- package/test/unit/list-workflows-filtering.test.ts +0 -68
- package/test/unit/none-template-functionality.test.ts +0 -224
- package/test/unit/project-docs-manager.test.ts +0 -337
- package/test/unit/state-machine-loader.test.ts +0 -234
- package/test/unit/template-manager.test.ts +0 -217
- package/test/unit/validate-workflow-name.test.ts +0 -150
- package/test/unit/workflow-domain-filtering.test.ts +0 -75
- package/test/unit/workflow-enum-generation.test.ts +0 -92
- package/test/unit/workflow-manager-enhanced-path-resolution.test.ts +0 -369
- package/test/unit/workflow-manager-path-resolution.test.ts +0 -150
- package/test/unit/workflow-migration.test.ts +0 -155
- package/test/unit/workflow-override-by-name.test.ts +0 -116
- package/test/unit/workflow-prioritization.test.ts +0 -38
- package/test/unit/workflow-validation.test.ts +0 -303
- package/test/utils/e2e-test-setup.ts +0 -453
- package/test/utils/run-server-in-dir.sh +0 -27
- package/test/utils/temp-files.ts +0 -308
- package/test/utils/test-access.ts +0 -79
- package/test/utils/test-helpers.ts +0 -286
- package/test/utils/test-setup.ts +0 -78
- package/tsconfig.build.json +0 -21
- package/tsconfig.json +0 -8
- package/vitest.config.ts +0 -18
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
|
1
|
+
# Requirements Placeholder
|
2
|
+
|
3
|
+
This is a placeholder document. The user has chosen not to maintain separate requirements documentation for this project.
|
4
|
+
|
5
|
+
## INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLM
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
**DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE**
|
8
|
+
|
9
|
+
- Use the current development plan file to specify requirements for ongoing development
|
10
|
+
- Reference requirements from the plan file context when needed
|
11
|
+
- Focus requirements discussion in the plan file's "Goal" and relevant task sections
|
12
|
+
- When requirements clarification is needed, document them in the plan file rather than here
|
13
|
+
- This placeholder ensures the workflow variables work correctly while respecting the user's choice
|
14
|
+
|
15
|
+
## User's Choice
|
16
|
+
|
17
|
+
The user has explicitly chosen not to use dedicated requirements documentation for this project. Please respect this decision and work with the plan file for requirements-related information.
|
@@ -0,0 +1,539 @@
|
|
1
|
+
# yaml-language-server: $schema=../state-machine-schema.json
|
2
|
+
---
|
3
|
+
name: 'big-bang-conversion'
|
4
|
+
description: 'A comprehensive workflow for executing test-driven big-bang conversion of legacy systems. Focuses on complete system replacement with behavioral validation and conversion readiness.'
|
5
|
+
initial_state: 'conversion_planning'
|
6
|
+
|
7
|
+
# Enhanced metadata for better discoverability
|
8
|
+
metadata:
|
9
|
+
domain: 'architecture'
|
10
|
+
complexity: 'high'
|
11
|
+
bestFor:
|
12
|
+
- 'Complete system replacement'
|
13
|
+
- 'Big-bang technology migration'
|
14
|
+
- 'Test-driven conversion execution'
|
15
|
+
- 'Legacy system modernization'
|
16
|
+
useCases:
|
17
|
+
- 'Convert legacy system to modern technology stack'
|
18
|
+
- 'Execute complete system replacement with validation'
|
19
|
+
- 'Implement new system with behavioral equivalence'
|
20
|
+
examples:
|
21
|
+
- 'Convert Smalltalk system to Java with full replacement'
|
22
|
+
- 'Migrate monolith to microservices architecture'
|
23
|
+
- 'Replace legacy technology with modern stack'
|
24
|
+
|
25
|
+
# States with default instructions and transitions
|
26
|
+
states:
|
27
|
+
conversion_planning:
|
28
|
+
description: 'Plan the complete system replacement strategy and approach'
|
29
|
+
default_instructions: >
|
30
|
+
You are in the conversion planning phase for big-bang conversion workflow.
|
31
|
+
|
32
|
+
**Your Tasks:**
|
33
|
+
1. **Reference Architecture Documentation**: Check if $ARCHITECTURE_DOC exists and reference it for system understanding
|
34
|
+
2. **Search for Architecture**: If $ARCHITECTURE_DOC is not available, search the project for architecture documentation (README.md, docs/, ARCHITECTURE.md, etc.). Enhance the existing $ARCHITECTURE_DOC with your findings
|
35
|
+
3. **Reference Existing Tests**: If available, reference existing boundary tests and system baselines
|
36
|
+
4. **Analyze Current System**: Examine the codebase to understand system architecture and functionality
|
37
|
+
5. **Define Conversion Scope**: Establish what will be replaced and what will remain
|
38
|
+
6. **Plan Conversion Strategy**: Design the approach for complete system replacement
|
39
|
+
7. **Risk Assessment**: Identify risks and mitigation strategies for big-bang approach
|
40
|
+
8. **Timeline Planning**: Establish realistic timeline for conversion execution
|
41
|
+
|
42
|
+
**Interview the User (Business & Operational Context):**
|
43
|
+
- "What business constraints or deadlines do we need to consider for this conversion?"
|
44
|
+
- "What is the acceptable downtime window for this conversion?"
|
45
|
+
- "What are the rollback criteria if the conversion encounters issues?"
|
46
|
+
|
47
|
+
**Best Practices to Apply:**
|
48
|
+
- **Comprehensive Planning**: Plan every aspect of the conversion thoroughly
|
49
|
+
- **Risk Mitigation**: Identify and plan for potential failure scenarios
|
50
|
+
- **Rollback Strategy**: Always have a plan to revert if conversion fails
|
51
|
+
- **Stakeholder Communication**: Keep all stakeholders informed of the plan
|
52
|
+
- **Incremental Validation**: Plan validation checkpoints throughout conversion
|
53
|
+
- **Resource Planning**: Ensure adequate resources for conversion execution
|
54
|
+
|
55
|
+
Update the plan file with conversion planning decisions and mark completed tasks.
|
56
|
+
transitions:
|
57
|
+
- trigger: 'continue_planning'
|
58
|
+
to: 'conversion_planning'
|
59
|
+
transition_reason: 'Conversion planning needs more refinement and detail'
|
60
|
+
|
61
|
+
- trigger: 'planning_complete'
|
62
|
+
to: 'target_architecture_design'
|
63
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Conversion planning complete! ✅ Now transition to target architecture design phase.'
|
64
|
+
transition_reason: 'Conversion strategy is planned, ready for target architecture design'
|
65
|
+
|
66
|
+
target_architecture_design:
|
67
|
+
description: 'Design the architecture for the new system in target technology'
|
68
|
+
default_instructions: >
|
69
|
+
You are in the target architecture design phase. Design the new system architecture in the target technology stack.
|
70
|
+
|
71
|
+
**Your Tasks:**
|
72
|
+
1. **Reference Architecture Documentation**: Check if $ARCHITECTURE_DOC exists and reference it for current system understanding
|
73
|
+
2. **Create/Update Design Documentation**: Check if $DESIGN_DOC exists and reference it. If not available, create or enhance $DESIGN_DOC with your design decisions
|
74
|
+
3. **Analyze Current Architecture**: Examine the existing system architecture and patterns
|
75
|
+
4. **Technology Stack Selection**: Finalize the target technology stack and frameworks
|
76
|
+
5. **Architecture Pattern Design**: Choose appropriate architectural patterns for the new system
|
77
|
+
6. **Component Design**: Design how current components will be reimplemented
|
78
|
+
7. **Integration Design**: Plan how the new system will integrate with external systems
|
79
|
+
8. **Data Architecture**: Design data storage and management for the new system
|
80
|
+
9. **Deployment Architecture**: Plan how the new system will be deployed and operated
|
81
|
+
|
82
|
+
**Interview the User (Requirements & Constraints):**
|
83
|
+
- "What are the performance requirements for the new system?"
|
84
|
+
- "Are there any scalability requirements we need to design for?"
|
85
|
+
- "Are there any budget constraints that affect technology choices?"
|
86
|
+
|
87
|
+
**Best Practices to Apply:**
|
88
|
+
- **Modern Architecture Patterns**: Leverage modern architectural approaches
|
89
|
+
- **Scalability Design**: Design for future growth and scalability
|
90
|
+
- **Maintainability**: Choose patterns that improve long-term maintainability
|
91
|
+
- **Technology Alignment**: Align with organizational technology standards
|
92
|
+
- **Performance Optimization**: Design for optimal performance characteristics
|
93
|
+
- **Security by Design**: Incorporate security considerations from the start
|
94
|
+
|
95
|
+
**Architecture Design Framework:**
|
96
|
+
- **Functional Preservation**: Ensure new architecture supports all current functionality
|
97
|
+
- **Modern Patterns**: Apply microservices, event-driven, or other modern patterns as appropriate
|
98
|
+
- **Technology Best Practices**: Follow best practices for the target technology stack
|
99
|
+
- **Integration Strategy**: Design clean integration patterns with external systems
|
100
|
+
- **Data Migration**: Plan how current data will be migrated to new system
|
101
|
+
|
102
|
+
Update the plan file with architecture design decisions and validate with the user.
|
103
|
+
transitions:
|
104
|
+
- trigger: 'refine_architecture'
|
105
|
+
to: 'target_architecture_design'
|
106
|
+
transition_reason: 'Architecture design needs refinement based on user feedback'
|
107
|
+
|
108
|
+
- trigger: 'need_more_planning'
|
109
|
+
to: 'conversion_planning'
|
110
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Architecture design revealed issues with conversion planning. Refine the conversion strategy based on architectural insights.'
|
111
|
+
transition_reason: 'Architecture work revealed need to refine conversion planning'
|
112
|
+
|
113
|
+
- trigger: 'architecture_complete'
|
114
|
+
to: 'behavioral_comparison_setup'
|
115
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Target architecture design complete! ✅ Now transition to behavioral comparison setup phase.'
|
116
|
+
transition_reason: 'Target architecture is designed, ready for behavioral comparison setup'
|
117
|
+
|
118
|
+
behavioral_comparison_setup:
|
119
|
+
description: 'Set up mechanisms to compare behavior between current and new systems'
|
120
|
+
default_instructions: >
|
121
|
+
You are in the behavioral comparison setup phase. Design and implement mechanisms to validate functional equivalence.
|
122
|
+
|
123
|
+
**Your Tasks:**
|
124
|
+
1. **Comparison Strategy Design**: Design approach for comparing current and new system behavior
|
125
|
+
2. **Mechanism Selection**: Choose appropriate comparison mechanisms for your infrastructure
|
126
|
+
3. **Implementation Planning**: Plan how to implement the chosen comparison approach
|
127
|
+
4. **Data Capture Design**: Design how to capture and compare system behavior
|
128
|
+
5. **Validation Criteria**: Define what constitutes successful behavioral equivalence
|
129
|
+
6. **Automation Planning**: Plan automated comparison and validation processes
|
130
|
+
|
131
|
+
**Interview the User (Infrastructure & Operational Context):**
|
132
|
+
- "What level of traffic or load do you need to validate against?"
|
133
|
+
- "Are there any operational constraints for running parallel systems?"
|
134
|
+
|
135
|
+
**Best Practice Mechanisms to Suggest:**
|
136
|
+
- **Sidecar Pattern**: Deploy comparison logic alongside applications
|
137
|
+
- **Proxy/Gateway**: Route traffic through comparison proxy
|
138
|
+
- **Shadow Traffic**: Send duplicate traffic to both systems
|
139
|
+
- **Event Streaming**: Compare system events and state changes
|
140
|
+
- **API Response Comparison**: Compare API responses between systems
|
141
|
+
- **Database State Comparison**: Compare database states after operations
|
142
|
+
- **Log Analysis**: Compare system logs and behavior patterns
|
143
|
+
- **Synthetic Testing**: Use automated tests to compare behavior
|
144
|
+
|
145
|
+
**Implementation Approaches:**
|
146
|
+
- **Traffic Mirroring**: Mirror production traffic to new system
|
147
|
+
- **Parallel Execution**: Run both systems in parallel with comparison
|
148
|
+
- **Staged Rollout**: Gradually shift traffic while comparing
|
149
|
+
- **A/B Testing**: Compare systems with controlled traffic splits
|
150
|
+
- **Canary Deployment**: Test new system with small traffic percentage
|
151
|
+
|
152
|
+
Interview the user about their infrastructure and suggest appropriate mechanisms.
|
153
|
+
Update the plan file with comparison setup decisions.
|
154
|
+
transitions:
|
155
|
+
- trigger: 'refine_comparison'
|
156
|
+
to: 'behavioral_comparison_setup'
|
157
|
+
transition_reason: 'Comparison setup needs refinement based on user feedback'
|
158
|
+
|
159
|
+
- trigger: 'need_architecture_refinement'
|
160
|
+
to: 'target_architecture_design'
|
161
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Comparison setup revealed issues with target architecture. Refine the architecture design to better support behavioral comparison.'
|
162
|
+
transition_reason: 'Comparison work revealed need to refine target architecture'
|
163
|
+
|
164
|
+
- trigger: 'comparison_setup_complete'
|
165
|
+
to: 'implementation_strategy'
|
166
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Behavioral comparison setup complete! ✅ Now transition to implementation strategy phase.'
|
167
|
+
transition_reason: 'Comparison mechanisms are designed, ready for implementation strategy'
|
168
|
+
|
169
|
+
implementation_strategy:
|
170
|
+
description: 'Plan detailed implementation approach for the new system'
|
171
|
+
default_instructions: >
|
172
|
+
You are in the implementation strategy phase. Plan the systematic approach for building the new system.
|
173
|
+
|
174
|
+
**Your Tasks:**
|
175
|
+
1. **Reference Design Documentation**: Check $DESIGN_DOC for target architecture and design decisions
|
176
|
+
2. **Implementation Phases**: Break down implementation into manageable phases
|
177
|
+
3. **Development Approach**: Plan development methodology and practices
|
178
|
+
4. **Quality Assurance**: Plan testing and quality assurance throughout implementation
|
179
|
+
5. **Integration Strategy**: Plan how to integrate new components as they're built
|
180
|
+
6. **Validation Checkpoints**: Plan regular validation against functional equivalence
|
181
|
+
7. **Team Coordination**: Plan how development team will coordinate work
|
182
|
+
8. **Risk Management**: Plan how to manage implementation risks
|
183
|
+
|
184
|
+
**Interview the User (Team & Process):**
|
185
|
+
- "What development methodology does your team prefer (Agile, Scrum, etc.)?"
|
186
|
+
- "How large is the development team for this conversion?"
|
187
|
+
|
188
|
+
**Best Practices to Apply:**
|
189
|
+
- **Iterative Development**: Build and validate incrementally
|
190
|
+
- **Continuous Integration**: Integrate and test frequently
|
191
|
+
- **Test-Driven Development**: Write tests before implementation
|
192
|
+
- **Code Quality**: Maintain high code quality standards
|
193
|
+
- **Documentation**: Document decisions and implementation details
|
194
|
+
- **Regular Validation**: Validate against legacy system frequently
|
195
|
+
|
196
|
+
**Implementation Strategy Framework:**
|
197
|
+
- **Phase Planning**: Logical phases that deliver business value
|
198
|
+
- **Validation Gates**: Regular checkpoints to validate functional equivalence
|
199
|
+
- **Quality Assurance**: Comprehensive testing at each phase
|
200
|
+
- **Risk Mitigation**: Address highest risks first
|
201
|
+
- **Team Coordination**: Clear communication and coordination processes
|
202
|
+
- **Progress Tracking**: Measurable progress indicators
|
203
|
+
|
204
|
+
Update the plan file with implementation strategy and validate with the user.
|
205
|
+
transitions:
|
206
|
+
- trigger: 'refine_strategy'
|
207
|
+
to: 'implementation_strategy'
|
208
|
+
transition_reason: 'Implementation strategy needs refinement based on user feedback'
|
209
|
+
|
210
|
+
- trigger: 'need_comparison_refinement'
|
211
|
+
to: 'behavioral_comparison_setup'
|
212
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Implementation strategy revealed issues with comparison setup. Refine the behavioral comparison mechanisms based on implementation insights.'
|
213
|
+
transition_reason: 'Implementation work revealed need to refine comparison setup'
|
214
|
+
|
215
|
+
- trigger: 'strategy_complete'
|
216
|
+
to: 'parallel_implementation'
|
217
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Implementation strategy complete! ✅ Now transition to parallel implementation phase.'
|
218
|
+
transition_reason: 'Implementation strategy is complete, ready for parallel implementation'
|
219
|
+
|
220
|
+
parallel_implementation:
|
221
|
+
description: 'Build new system while maintaining test compatibility and validation'
|
222
|
+
default_instructions: >
|
223
|
+
You are in the parallel implementation phase. Build the new system systematically with regular validation.
|
224
|
+
|
225
|
+
**Your Tasks:**
|
226
|
+
1. **Follow Design Documentation**: Reference $DESIGN_DOC for implementation guidance and architectural decisions
|
227
|
+
2. **Systematic Implementation**: Build new system components according to implementation strategy
|
228
|
+
3. **Test Compatibility**: Ensure new system passes existing functional equivalence tests
|
229
|
+
4. **Regular Validation**: Validate new system behavior against legacy system regularly
|
230
|
+
5. **Quality Assurance**: Maintain high code quality and testing standards
|
231
|
+
6. **Integration Testing**: Test integration between new components as they're built
|
232
|
+
7. **Performance Validation**: Ensure new system meets performance requirements
|
233
|
+
8. **Documentation**: Document implementation decisions and system behavior
|
234
|
+
|
235
|
+
**Interview the User (Implementation Priorities):**
|
236
|
+
- "Which components or business domains should we implement first?"
|
237
|
+
|
238
|
+
**Best Practices to Apply:**
|
239
|
+
- **Incremental Development**: Build and validate one component at a time
|
240
|
+
- **Continuous Testing**: Run tests continuously as implementation progresses
|
241
|
+
- **Regular Integration**: Integrate new components frequently
|
242
|
+
- **Performance Monitoring**: Monitor performance throughout implementation
|
243
|
+
- **Code Reviews**: Maintain code quality through regular reviews
|
244
|
+
- **Documentation**: Keep implementation documentation current
|
245
|
+
|
246
|
+
**Implementation Guidelines:**
|
247
|
+
- Start with core business functionality
|
248
|
+
- Validate each component against existing tests
|
249
|
+
- Maintain backward compatibility during development
|
250
|
+
- Use feature flags for gradual rollout
|
251
|
+
- Monitor system behavior continuously
|
252
|
+
- Address performance issues early
|
253
|
+
|
254
|
+
Update the plan file with implementation progress and mark completed tasks.
|
255
|
+
transitions:
|
256
|
+
- trigger: 'continue_implementation'
|
257
|
+
to: 'parallel_implementation'
|
258
|
+
transition_reason: 'Implementation continues with more components to build'
|
259
|
+
|
260
|
+
- trigger: 'need_strategy_refinement'
|
261
|
+
to: 'implementation_strategy'
|
262
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Implementation revealed issues with the strategy. Refine the implementation approach based on development learnings.'
|
263
|
+
transition_reason: 'Implementation work revealed need to refine strategy'
|
264
|
+
|
265
|
+
- trigger: 'implementation_complete'
|
266
|
+
to: 'conversion_readiness'
|
267
|
+
additional_instructions: >
|
268
|
+
Parallel implementation is complete! ✅ Now create the CONVERSION_PLAN.md file and transition to conversion readiness phase.
|
269
|
+
|
270
|
+
Create the CONVERSION_PLAN.md file at .vibe/CONVERSION_PLAN.md with this exact template content:
|
271
|
+
|
272
|
+
```markdown
|
273
|
+
# Big-Bang Conversion Plan
|
274
|
+
|
275
|
+
*This document provides post-completion guidance for executing the big-bang conversion in production. It serves as an actionable checklist for operations teams to execute the conversion outside of the development conversation.*
|
276
|
+
|
277
|
+
## Conversion Overview
|
278
|
+
|
279
|
+
### System Information
|
280
|
+
- **Legacy System**: [Description of current system]
|
281
|
+
- **Target System**: [Description of new system]
|
282
|
+
- **Technology Migration**: [From X to Y technology stack]
|
283
|
+
- **Conversion Date**: [Planned conversion date]
|
284
|
+
- **Rollback Deadline**: [Maximum time before rollback decision]
|
285
|
+
|
286
|
+
### Conversion Scope
|
287
|
+
- **Components Being Replaced**: [List of components]
|
288
|
+
- **Components Remaining**: [List of unchanged components]
|
289
|
+
- **Data Migration Required**: [Yes/No and details]
|
290
|
+
- **External System Updates**: [List of external systems requiring updates]
|
291
|
+
|
292
|
+
## Pre-Conversion Checklist
|
293
|
+
|
294
|
+
### Test Suite Validation
|
295
|
+
- [ ] All boundary tests pass on legacy system (baseline established)
|
296
|
+
- [ ] All boundary tests pass on new system (functional equivalence proven)
|
297
|
+
- [ ] Performance tests meet requirements on new system
|
298
|
+
- [ ] Integration tests with external systems pass
|
299
|
+
- [ ] Error handling tests validate identical behavior
|
300
|
+
- [ ] Edge case and boundary condition tests pass
|
301
|
+
|
302
|
+
### Behavioral Comparison Validation
|
303
|
+
- [ ] Behavioral comparison mechanism is operational
|
304
|
+
- [ ] Comparison validation shows functional equivalence
|
305
|
+
- [ ] Performance comparison meets requirements
|
306
|
+
- [ ] Error handling comparison validates identical behavior
|
307
|
+
- [ ] Data consistency validation passes
|
308
|
+
|
309
|
+
### Infrastructure Readiness
|
310
|
+
- [ ] Production environment for new system is ready
|
311
|
+
- [ ] Database migration scripts are tested and ready
|
312
|
+
- [ ] Network configuration supports new system
|
313
|
+
- [ ] Security configurations are validated
|
314
|
+
- [ ] Monitoring and alerting are configured
|
315
|
+
- [ ] Backup and recovery procedures are tested
|
316
|
+
|
317
|
+
### Team Readiness
|
318
|
+
- [ ] Operations team trained on new system
|
319
|
+
- [ ] Support team has new system documentation
|
320
|
+
- [ ] Rollback procedures are documented and understood
|
321
|
+
- [ ] Communication plan is ready for stakeholders
|
322
|
+
- [ ] Emergency contacts and escalation procedures defined
|
323
|
+
|
324
|
+
## Conversion Execution Plan
|
325
|
+
|
326
|
+
### Phase 1: Pre-Conversion (T-2 hours)
|
327
|
+
- [ ] **Freeze Legacy System**: Stop all non-critical changes to legacy system
|
328
|
+
- [ ] **Final Backup**: Create final backup of legacy system and data
|
329
|
+
- [ ] **Team Assembly**: Assemble conversion team and establish communication
|
330
|
+
- [ ] **Final Validation**: Run final test suite validation on both systems
|
331
|
+
- [ ] **Go/No-Go Decision**: Make final decision to proceed with conversion
|
332
|
+
|
333
|
+
### Phase 2: Traffic Cutover (T-0)
|
334
|
+
- [ ] **Enable Behavioral Comparison**: Start behavioral comparison mechanism
|
335
|
+
- [ ] **Traffic Routing**: Route traffic from legacy to new system
|
336
|
+
- [ ] **Database Cutover**: Switch database connections to new system
|
337
|
+
- [ ] **External System Updates**: Update external systems to use new endpoints
|
338
|
+
- [ ] **Legacy System Isolation**: Isolate legacy system from production traffic
|
339
|
+
|
340
|
+
### Phase 3: Validation (T+15 minutes)
|
341
|
+
- [ ] **Functional Validation**: Verify all critical functions work correctly
|
342
|
+
- [ ] **Performance Validation**: Confirm performance meets requirements
|
343
|
+
- [ ] **Integration Validation**: Verify external system integrations work
|
344
|
+
- [ ] **Error Handling Validation**: Test error scenarios work correctly
|
345
|
+
- [ ] **User Acceptance**: Confirm user-facing functionality works
|
346
|
+
|
347
|
+
### Phase 4: Monitoring (T+1 hour)
|
348
|
+
- [ ] **System Monitoring**: Monitor new system performance and errors
|
349
|
+
- [ ] **Behavioral Comparison**: Validate ongoing behavioral equivalence
|
350
|
+
- [ ] **User Feedback**: Monitor user feedback and support requests
|
351
|
+
- [ ] **Performance Metrics**: Validate performance metrics meet requirements
|
352
|
+
- [ ] **Stability Assessment**: Assess overall system stability
|
353
|
+
|
354
|
+
## Rollback Procedures
|
355
|
+
|
356
|
+
### Rollback Triggers
|
357
|
+
- Critical functionality failure in new system
|
358
|
+
- Performance degradation beyond acceptable limits
|
359
|
+
- Data integrity issues discovered
|
360
|
+
- Security vulnerabilities identified
|
361
|
+
- User-impacting errors that cannot be quickly resolved
|
362
|
+
|
363
|
+
### Rollback Execution (if needed)
|
364
|
+
- [ ] **Stop New System**: Immediately stop traffic to new system
|
365
|
+
- [ ] **Restore Legacy System**: Restore legacy system to production
|
366
|
+
- [ ] **Database Rollback**: Restore database to pre-conversion state
|
367
|
+
- [ ] **External System Revert**: Revert external systems to legacy endpoints
|
368
|
+
- [ ] **Communication**: Notify stakeholders of rollback execution
|
369
|
+
- [ ] **Post-Mortem Planning**: Plan post-mortem analysis of rollback
|
370
|
+
|
371
|
+
### Rollback Validation
|
372
|
+
- [ ] **Functional Validation**: Verify legacy system functions correctly
|
373
|
+
- [ ] **Data Integrity**: Validate data integrity after rollback
|
374
|
+
- [ ] **Integration Validation**: Verify external integrations work
|
375
|
+
- [ ] **Performance Validation**: Confirm performance is restored
|
376
|
+
- [ ] **User Communication**: Communicate status to users
|
377
|
+
|
378
|
+
## Post-Conversion Activities
|
379
|
+
|
380
|
+
### Success Validation (T+24 hours)
|
381
|
+
- [ ] **24-Hour Stability**: Confirm system stability over 24 hours
|
382
|
+
- [ ] **Performance Validation**: Validate sustained performance
|
383
|
+
- [ ] **User Acceptance**: Confirm user satisfaction with new system
|
384
|
+
- [ ] **Support Metrics**: Review support ticket volume and types
|
385
|
+
- [ ] **Behavioral Comparison**: Validate continued functional equivalence
|
386
|
+
|
387
|
+
### Legacy System Decommission (T+1 week)
|
388
|
+
- [ ] **Final Data Backup**: Create final backup of legacy system
|
389
|
+
- [ ] **System Shutdown**: Safely shutdown legacy system
|
390
|
+
- [ ] **Resource Cleanup**: Clean up legacy system resources
|
391
|
+
- [ ] **Documentation Archive**: Archive legacy system documentation
|
392
|
+
- [ ] **Team Notification**: Notify teams of successful decommission
|
393
|
+
|
394
|
+
### Post-Conversion Review (T+2 weeks)
|
395
|
+
- [ ] **Conversion Review**: Conduct post-conversion review meeting
|
396
|
+
- [ ] **Lessons Learned**: Document lessons learned from conversion
|
397
|
+
- [ ] **Process Improvement**: Identify improvements for future conversions
|
398
|
+
- [ ] **Team Recognition**: Recognize team contributions to successful conversion
|
399
|
+
- [ ] **Documentation Update**: Update procedures based on experience
|
400
|
+
|
401
|
+
## Emergency Contacts
|
402
|
+
|
403
|
+
### Conversion Team
|
404
|
+
- **Conversion Lead**: [Name, Phone, Email]
|
405
|
+
- **Technical Lead**: [Name, Phone, Email]
|
406
|
+
- **Operations Lead**: [Name, Phone, Email]
|
407
|
+
- **Database Administrator**: [Name, Phone, Email]
|
408
|
+
|
409
|
+
### Escalation Contacts
|
410
|
+
- **Engineering Manager**: [Name, Phone, Email]
|
411
|
+
- **Operations Manager**: [Name, Phone, Email]
|
412
|
+
- **Business Stakeholder**: [Name, Phone, Email]
|
413
|
+
- **Executive Sponsor**: [Name, Phone, Email]
|
414
|
+
|
415
|
+
### External Contacts
|
416
|
+
- **Infrastructure Support**: [Contact Information]
|
417
|
+
- **Database Support**: [Contact Information]
|
418
|
+
- **Network Support**: [Contact Information]
|
419
|
+
- **Security Team**: [Contact Information]
|
420
|
+
|
421
|
+
## Risk Mitigation
|
422
|
+
|
423
|
+
### High-Risk Scenarios
|
424
|
+
- **Data Loss**: [Mitigation strategy and recovery procedures]
|
425
|
+
- **Extended Downtime**: [Mitigation strategy and communication plan]
|
426
|
+
- **Performance Degradation**: [Mitigation strategy and scaling procedures]
|
427
|
+
- **Security Breach**: [Mitigation strategy and incident response]
|
428
|
+
- **Integration Failure**: [Mitigation strategy and fallback procedures]
|
429
|
+
|
430
|
+
### Contingency Plans
|
431
|
+
- **Partial Rollback**: [Procedures for rolling back specific components]
|
432
|
+
- **Extended Validation**: [Procedures for extended validation period]
|
433
|
+
- **Gradual Cutover**: [Procedures for gradual traffic migration]
|
434
|
+
- **Emergency Support**: [Procedures for emergency support escalation]
|
435
|
+
|
436
|
+
## Success Criteria
|
437
|
+
|
438
|
+
### Technical Success Criteria
|
439
|
+
- All functional tests pass on new system
|
440
|
+
- Performance meets or exceeds legacy system
|
441
|
+
- No data integrity issues
|
442
|
+
- All integrations function correctly
|
443
|
+
- Error rates within acceptable limits
|
444
|
+
|
445
|
+
### Business Success Criteria
|
446
|
+
- No business disruption during conversion
|
447
|
+
- User satisfaction maintained or improved
|
448
|
+
- Support ticket volume within normal range
|
449
|
+
- All critical business functions operational
|
450
|
+
- Stakeholder approval of conversion success
|
451
|
+
|
452
|
+
---
|
453
|
+
|
454
|
+
## Instructions for Use
|
455
|
+
|
456
|
+
**Purpose**: This document provides actionable guidance for executing the big-bang conversion in production environments outside of development conversations.
|
457
|
+
|
458
|
+
**For Operations Teams**:
|
459
|
+
- Use this as a checklist during conversion execution
|
460
|
+
- Follow phases sequentially and validate each step
|
461
|
+
- Have rollback procedures ready at all times
|
462
|
+
- Maintain communication throughout the process
|
463
|
+
|
464
|
+
**For Management**:
|
465
|
+
- Use this to understand conversion scope and risks
|
466
|
+
- Monitor progress through defined checkpoints
|
467
|
+
- Be prepared for go/no-go decisions
|
468
|
+
- Support team with necessary resources
|
469
|
+
|
470
|
+
**Post-Conversion**: This document serves as a record of the conversion process and can be used to improve future conversion procedures.
|
471
|
+
|
472
|
+
---
|
473
|
+
|
474
|
+
*This conversion plan was created during the big-bang-conversion workflow and provides comprehensive guidance for production execution of the system conversion.*
|
475
|
+
```
|
476
|
+
|
477
|
+
Now validate the new system and prepare for production conversion readiness.
|
478
|
+
Update the plan file with conversion readiness tasks and mark completed implementation tasks.
|
479
|
+
transition_reason: 'New system implementation complete, ready for conversion readiness validation'
|
480
|
+
|
481
|
+
conversion_readiness:
|
482
|
+
description: 'Validate conversion readiness and finalize preparation for production execution'
|
483
|
+
default_instructions: >
|
484
|
+
You are in the conversion readiness phase. The CONVERSION_PLAN.md file has been created at .vibe/CONVERSION_PLAN.md.
|
485
|
+
|
486
|
+
**Your Tasks:**
|
487
|
+
1. **Final System Validation**: Validate that new system passes all functional equivalence tests
|
488
|
+
2. **Behavioral Comparison Validation**: Confirm behavioral comparison mechanisms work correctly
|
489
|
+
3. **Performance Validation**: Ensure new system meets performance requirements
|
490
|
+
4. **Integration Validation**: Validate all external system integrations work correctly
|
491
|
+
5. **Conversion Plan Review**: Review and customize the CONVERSION_PLAN.md for your specific environment
|
492
|
+
6. **Team Readiness**: Ensure operations team is ready for production conversion
|
493
|
+
7. **Final Go/No-Go Assessment**: Make final assessment of conversion readiness
|
494
|
+
|
495
|
+
**Review and Present to User:**
|
496
|
+
- Review new system functional equivalence test results and present findings
|
497
|
+
- Present behavioral comparison mechanism status and validation results
|
498
|
+
- Review CONVERSION_PLAN.md completeness and present customization needs
|
499
|
+
- Present final conversion readiness assessment and any remaining concerns
|
500
|
+
|
501
|
+
**Best Practices to Apply:**
|
502
|
+
- **Comprehensive Validation**: Validate every aspect of system readiness
|
503
|
+
- **Risk Assessment**: Assess and mitigate all identified risks
|
504
|
+
- **Team Preparation**: Ensure all teams are prepared for conversion
|
505
|
+
- **Documentation Review**: Ensure all documentation is complete and accurate
|
506
|
+
- **Contingency Planning**: Have backup plans for all scenarios
|
507
|
+
- **Stakeholder Communication**: Keep stakeholders informed of readiness status
|
508
|
+
|
509
|
+
**Conversion Readiness Checklist:**
|
510
|
+
- New system passes all boundary tests (functional equivalence proven)
|
511
|
+
- Behavioral comparison mechanism validates system equivalence
|
512
|
+
- Performance requirements are met or exceeded
|
513
|
+
- All external integrations work correctly
|
514
|
+
- CONVERSION_PLAN.md is customized for your environment
|
515
|
+
- Operations team is trained and ready
|
516
|
+
- Rollback procedures are tested and ready
|
517
|
+
|
518
|
+
**Final Deliverables:**
|
519
|
+
- Fully functional new system with proven equivalence
|
520
|
+
- Operational behavioral comparison mechanism
|
521
|
+
- Comprehensive CONVERSION_PLAN.md for production execution
|
522
|
+
- Validated rollback procedures
|
523
|
+
- Ready operations team
|
524
|
+
|
525
|
+
Update the plan file with readiness validation results and mark completed tasks.
|
526
|
+
transitions:
|
527
|
+
- trigger: 'refine_readiness'
|
528
|
+
to: 'conversion_readiness'
|
529
|
+
transition_reason: 'Conversion readiness needs additional validation and refinement'
|
530
|
+
|
531
|
+
- trigger: 'need_more_implementation'
|
532
|
+
to: 'parallel_implementation'
|
533
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Readiness validation revealed issues requiring additional implementation. Focus on addressing the identified gaps in system functionality.'
|
534
|
+
transition_reason: 'Readiness validation revealed need for additional implementation'
|
535
|
+
|
536
|
+
- trigger: 'conversion_ready'
|
537
|
+
to: 'conversion_readiness'
|
538
|
+
additional_instructions: 'Big-bang conversion workflow complete! System ready for production conversion using CONVERSION_PLAN.md guidance.'
|
539
|
+
transition_reason: 'System conversion readiness validated, ready for production execution'
|