@cluesmith/codev 3.0.0-rc.9 → 3.0.1

package/skeleton/protocols/tick/templates/review.md

@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
-# TICK Review: [Title]
-
-## Metadata
-- **ID**: ####-[short-name]
-- **Protocol**: TICK
-- **Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
-- **Specification**: [Link to spec file]
-- **Plan**: [Link to plan file]
-- **Status**: [completed/needs-fixes]
-
-## Implementation Summary
-[Brief description of what was implemented]
-
-## Success Criteria Status
-- [ ] [Criterion 1 from spec]
-- [ ] [Criterion 2 from spec]
-- [ ] [Criterion 3 from spec]
-- [ ] Tests passed
-- [ ] No breaking changes
-
-## Files Changed
-
-### Created
-- `path/to/file1.ts` - [purpose]
-- `path/to/file2.ts` - [purpose]
-
-### Modified
-- `path/to/existing1.ts` - [changes made]
-- `path/to/existing2.ts` - [changes made]
-
-## Deviations from Plan
-[None if plan was followed exactly, otherwise list what changed and why]
-
-## Testing Results
-
-### Manual Tests
-1. [Scenario 1] - ✅/❌
-2. [Scenario 2] - ✅/❌
-3. [Scenario 3] - ✅/❌
-
-### Automated Tests (if applicable)
-- [Test result summary]
-
-## Challenges Encountered
-1. [Challenge 1]
-   - **Solution**: [How resolved]
-2. [Challenge 2]
-   - **Solution**: [How resolved]
-
-## Lessons Learned
-
-### What Went Well
-- [Success point 1]
-- [Success point 2]
-
-### What Could Improve
-- [Improvement area 1]
-- [Improvement area 2]
-
-## Consultation Feedback
-
-[For each phase that had consultation, summarize every reviewer's concerns and how the builder responded. Use **Addressed** (fixed), **Rebutted** (disagreed with reasoning), or **N/A** (out of scope/moot) for each concern. If all reviewers approved with no concerns: "No concerns raised — all consultations approved."]
-
-### [Phase] Phase (Round N)
-
-#### Gemini
-- **Concern**: [Summary of concern]
-  - **Addressed**: [What was changed]
-
-#### Codex
-- **Concern**: [Summary of concern]
-  - **Rebutted**: [Why current approach is correct]
-
-#### Claude
-- No concerns raised (APPROVE)
-
-## TICK Protocol Feedback
-- **Autonomous execution**: [Worked well / Issues encountered]
-- **Single-phase approach**: [Appropriate / Should have used SPIR]
-- **Speed vs quality trade-off**: [Balanced / Too fast / Too slow]
-- **End-only consultation**: [Caught issues / Missed opportunities]
-
-## Follow-Up Actions
-- [ ] [Any remaining work]
-- [ ] [Technical debt created]
-- [ ] [Future enhancements]
-
-## Conclusion
-[Brief summary of outcome and whether TICK was appropriate for this task]

package/skeleton/protocols/tick/templates/spec.md

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
-# TICK Specification: [Title]
-
-## Metadata
-- **ID**: ####-[short-name]
-- **Protocol**: TICK
-- **Created**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
-- **Status**: autonomous
-
-## Task Description
-[What needs to be built? Be specific and concise.]
-
-## Scope
-
-### In Scope
-- [Feature/change 1]
-- [Feature/change 2]
-- [Feature/change 3]
-
-### Out of Scope
-- [What we're NOT doing]
-- [Future considerations]
-
-## Success Criteria
-- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 1]
-- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 2]
-- [ ] [Specific, testable criterion 3]
-- [ ] Tests pass
-- [ ] No breaking changes
-
-## Constraints
-- [Technical limitation 1]
-- [Technical limitation 2]
-- [Time/scope constraints]
-
-## Assumptions
-- [Assumption 1]
-- [Assumption 2]
-- [Dependencies]
-
-## Implementation Approach
-[Brief description of how this will be implemented - single approach only]
-
-### Key Changes
-- [File/component 1: what will change]
-- [File/component 2: what will change]
-- [File/component 3: what will change]
-
-## Risks
-| Risk | Mitigation |
-|------|------------|
-| [Risk 1] | [How to handle] |
-| [Risk 2] | [How to handle] |
-
-## Testing Approach
-### Test Scenarios
-1. [Happy path scenario]
-2. [Edge case scenario]
-3. [Error scenario]
-
-## Notes
-[Any additional context]