@clipboard-health/ai-rules 2.9.0 → 2.9.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -32,20 +32,16 @@ Then, for EVERY comment (both `unresolvedComments` AND `nitpickComments`):
|
|
|
32
32
|
|
|
33
33
|
1. Group comments by file path and read each file once (not per-comment)
|
|
34
34
|
2. If a file no longer exists, note that the comment may be outdated
|
|
35
|
-
3. Assess
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
- **Disagree**: Explain why the current code is acceptable
|
|
38
|
-
- **Already fixed**: Note that the code already addresses this concern
|
|
39
|
-
4. When multiple comments appear at the same file and line, they are part of the same review thread — read them together as a conversation and assess the original feedback
|
|
40
|
-
5. Present your assessment in list format (renders reliably in terminals):
|
|
35
|
+
3. Assess each comment against the current code. When multiple comments appear at the same file and line, they are part of the same review thread — read them together as a conversation
|
|
36
|
+
4. Group your assessment as follows:
|
|
41
37
|
|
|
42
|
-
**
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
38
|
+
**Should address**
|
|
39
|
+
- Description of the comment with file path(s)
|
|
40
|
+
- Why it's a real issue (bug, a11y, UX, etc.)
|
|
44
41
|
|
|
45
|
-
**
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
42
|
+
**Can ignore**
|
|
43
|
+
- Description of the comment with file path(s)
|
|
44
|
+
- Why: already fixed, not actionable, not worth addressing in this PR, etc.
|
|
47
45
|
|
|
48
|
-
**
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
Then, offer to fix any issues where you agreed.
|
|
46
|
+
**Net**
|
|
47
|
+
Summary of how many are worth fixing and what kind of issues they are. Offer to fix, but **do NOT start until the user confirms**.
|