@clear-capabilities/agentic-security-scanner 0.172.1 → 0.174.0

package/dist/5199.index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,305 @@
+export const id = 5199;
+export const ids = [5199];
+export const modules = {
+
+/***/ 45199:
+/***/ ((__unused_webpack___webpack_module__, __webpack_exports__, __webpack_require__) => {
+
+/* harmony export */ __webpack_require__.d(__webpack_exports__, {
+/* harmony export */   ASSURANCE_MODES: () => (/* binding */ ASSURANCE_MODES),
+/* harmony export */   DEFAULT_ASSURANCE_MODE: () => (/* binding */ DEFAULT_ASSURANCE_MODE),
+/* harmony export */   evaluateAssuranceMode: () => (/* binding */ evaluateAssuranceMode)
+/* harmony export */ });
+/* unused harmony export _internals */
+/* harmony import */ var _posture_provenance_schema_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__ = __webpack_require__(49171);
+// Assurance modes (assurance-hardening PRD FR-204).
+//
+// "Add assurance modes: advisory, standard, and strict | Strict mode fails
+// when a required analyzer fails, times out, is unavailable, or is
+// silently skipped." Section 12.1 names the CLI surface:
+// `--assurance advisory|standard|strict`.
+//
+// Built directly on FR-203's coverage ledger (pipeline/coverage-ledger.js)
+// and FR-206's scan-health.js -- this module adds no new signal collection
+// of its own, only a POLICY over signals that already exist. That is
+// deliberate: assurance modes decide how strict to be about incomplete
+// analysis; they must never be the thing that DEFINES what "incomplete"
+// means, or the two concepts would drift out of sync.
+//
+// THREE MODES:
+//   advisory — never fails the gate over scan health, regardless of what
+//     scanHealth reports. Purely informational (surfaced in scanHealth /
+//     toShipVerdict / `ci`'s stderr, per FR-206's fix -- this mode does not
+//     suppress that, it just does not ADD a build-failing consequence).
+//   standard (the DEFAULT, matching this codebase's behavior before and
+//     after FR-204) — same as advisory for gate purposes: an incomplete
+//     scan is surfaced, never silently hidden, but does not itself fail a
+//     build independent of the ordinary --fail-on severity threshold. The
+//     distinction from advisory is one of INTENT/reporting emphasis, not
+//     mechanism -- see the module-level note below on why this codebase
+//     does not invent a mechanical difference the PRD text does not ask
+//     for.
+//   strict — an incomplete scan (any analyzer failed, timed out, or was
+//     skipped by policy -- the ledger's own three non-"completed" outcomes)
+//     is a HARD FAILURE, independent of and IN ADDITION TO --fail-on,
+//     mirroring cmdCi's own existing precedent for its --policy gate
+//     ("Policy runs ALONGSIDE the --fail-on threshold; either gate can
+//     fail the build").
+//
+// WHY ADVISORY AND STANDARD ARE MECHANICALLY IDENTICAL HERE: the PRD's own
+// one-line acceptance criterion only specifies STRICT mode's behavior in
+// full ("fails when..."); it does not name a distinct mechanical
+// consequence for standard beyond "the default, not strict." Inventing an
+// intermediate failure condition neither named in the PRD nor requested
+// would be exactly the kind of unrequested scope-widening this codebase's
+// own conventions warn against. If a future requirement needs standard
+// mode to behave differently from advisory, that is a deliberate, separate
+// decision -- not something to guess at here.
+
+
+
+const ASSURANCE_MODES = Object.freeze(['advisory', 'standard', 'strict']);
+const DEFAULT_ASSURANCE_MODE = 'standard';
+
+function _isValidMode(mode) {
+  return ASSURANCE_MODES.includes(mode);
+}
+
+// A real user hit this: `agentic-security ci <a directory downloaded as a
+// GitHub zip, no .git present> --assurance strict` failed with the bare
+// count this function used to produce alone — "1210 finding(s) have status
+// outside [complete, uncommitted]" — with no indication that all 1210
+// findings failed for the exact same, simple, fixable reason
+// (`coordinator.js`'s `annotateGitProvenance` already knows and records it,
+// in `finding.findingProvenance.limitations[0]`, but that reason never
+// reached this message). A user reading "1210 problems" reasonably assumes
+// their CODE has 1210 problems, not that their DIRECTORY isn't a git
+// repository. This surfaces the dominant recorded reason instead of a bare
+// count, and gives the two most common, fully-fixable reasons ("not a Git
+// repository" from a zip download instead of `git clone`; a shallow CI
+// checkout) a one-line, specific remedy — the same specificity the
+// scanHealth branch above already gives for a stale-EPSS-cache failure.
+function _provenanceFailureReason(badProvenance, totalFindings) {
+  const counts = new Map();
+  for (const f of badProvenance) {
+    const reason = f?.findingProvenance?.limitations?.[0] || f?.findingProvenance?.status || 'unknown';
+    counts.set(reason, (counts.get(reason) || 0) + 1);
+  }
+  const ranked = [...counts.entries()].sort((a, b) => b[1] - a[1]);
+  const base = `strict mode requires complete finding provenance; ${badProvenance.length}/${totalFindings} finding(s) have status outside [complete, uncommitted]`;
+
+  const gitReasons = ranked.filter(([r]) => r === 'not a Git repository' || r === 'repository state unavailable');
+  const gitCount = gitReasons.reduce((s, [, n]) => s + n, 0);
+  // engine.js's own comment on this branch: "unpinned_dep / no_lockfile...
+  // describe the ABSENCE of a declaration, so 'which commit introduced this
+  // version' is not a question that has an answer to defer ... this is a
+  // known, disclosed limitation, not a bug... strict mode WILL fail on
+  // nearly any real project that has a package.json." That disclosure lived
+  // only in a source comment nobody hits this error reads — the README's
+  // own quickstart explicitly invites pointing --assurance strict at "your
+  // own project," where this is the single most likely outcome. Named here
+  // so the person who hits it learns it is expected and permanent, not
+  // something to keep investigating. This prefix is deliberately narrower
+  // than "every non-vulnerable_dep supply-chain entry" — engine.js's
+  // provenance-stamping loop only uses it for unpinned_dep/no_lockfile,
+  // which genuinely have no origin commit; cdn_no_integrity/dynamic_require
+  // carry a real file:line and get a DIFFERENT string precisely so they
+  // never land in this "permanent, give up" bucket (adversarial premortem
+  // R2, 2026-09-07 — conflating the two told a user a resolvable coverage
+  // gap was an unfixable, by-design limitation).
+  const supplyChainReasons = ranked.filter(([r]) => r.startsWith('origin resolution does not apply to a'));
+  const supplyChainCount = supplyChainReasons.reduce((s, [, n]) => s + n, 0);
+  // Third known bucket (S1, adversarial premortem third pass, 2026-09-07):
+  // cdn_no_integrity/dynamic_require's "not yet wired" string (see the
+  // engine.js comment this file's `supplyChainReasons` block already
+  // references) was previously falling through to the generic `otherReasons`
+  // path below — honest, but verbose, and with no recommended next step,
+  // unlike every other named bucket here. Giving it its own bucket closes
+  // that inconsistency without touching the two already-fixed buckets.
+  const notYetWiredReasons = ranked.filter(([r]) => r.startsWith('origin resolution is not yet wired for a'));
+  const notYetWiredCount = notYetWiredReasons.reduce((s, [, n]) => s + n, 0);
+  const knownReasonSet = new Set([...gitReasons, ...supplyChainReasons, ...notYetWiredReasons].map(([r]) => r));
+  const otherReasons = ranked.filter(([r]) => !knownReasonSet.has(r));
+  const otherCount = badProvenance.length - gitCount - supplyChainCount - notYetWiredCount;
+  const knownCategoryCount = (gitCount > 0 ? 1 : 0) + (supplyChainCount > 0 ? 1 : 0) + (notYetWiredCount > 0 ? 1 : 0);
+
+  // Exactly one KNOWN category, and nothing outside it — the shape every
+  // caller before this fix assumed was the only shape, and the one every
+  // existing test was written against. Kept as tight, single-topic prose
+  // rather than the multi-segment form below.
+  if (knownCategoryCount === 0) {
+    if (otherReasons.length === 1) {
+      return `${base} — all ${badProvenance.length} share the same reason: "${otherReasons[0][0]}".`;
+    }
+    const breakdown = otherReasons.slice(0, 5).map(([reason, n]) => `${n}× "${reason}"`).join(', ');
+    return `${base} — breakdown: ${breakdown}${otherReasons.length > 5 ? ', …' : ''}.`;
+  }
+  if (knownCategoryCount === 1 && otherCount === 0) {
+    if (gitCount > 0) {
+      const gitReasonNames = gitReasons.map(([r]) => `"${r}"`).join(' and ');
+      return `${base} — reason: ${gitCount === badProvenance.length ? 'all of them are' : `${gitCount} of them are`} ${gitReasonNames}. ` +
+        `strict mode resolves finding provenance from git history, so it requires a real git repository ` +
+        `(a GitHub "Download ZIP" extracts without one). Run \`git init && git add -A && git commit -m init\` in ` +
+        `the scanned directory, point the scan at a real \`git clone\`, or drop --assurance strict for standard/advisory.`;
+    }
+    if (supplyChainCount > 0) {
+      return `${base} — ${supplyChainCount} of them describe an ABSENT dependency declaration ` +
+        `(an unpinned version, a missing lockfile) that has no origin commit to resolve, by design. This is a ` +
+        `known, permanent limitation: strict mode cannot pass while any are present, on any real project with ` +
+        `such a dependency. Fix the underlying SCA finding(s) (pin the version / add a lockfile) if you want ` +
+        `strict to pass, or use --assurance standard/advisory for a project you don't control the dependencies of.`;
+    }
+    return `${base} — ${notYetWiredCount} of them point at a real source location (a CDN script tag, a dynamic ` +
+      `require) this engine can't yet trace back to the commit that introduced it — unlike the ABSENT-declaration ` +
+      `case above, this is an ordinary coverage gap, not a permanent limitation, but it isn't fixable from your ` +
+      `side either. Use --assurance standard/advisory if you need this scan to pass today.`;
+  }
+
+  // Two or more independently-blocking categories on the SAME scan — the
+  // defect this closes (adversarial premortem R1, 2026-09-07): the old
+  // code picked whichever category had the most findings and silently
+  // dropped every other one, so a user could "fix" the reported problem,
+  // rerun, and hit a second wall the first run already had full information
+  // about but never mentioned — the same "the tool knew and didn't tell me"
+  // complaint this whole function exists to fix, recurring in a milder form.
+  //
+  // Rendered as a bulleted, newline-separated list rather than one
+  // semicolon-joined paragraph (S2, adversarial premortem third pass,
+  // 2026-09-07) — each bullet is independently actionable, and a wall of
+  // clauses buried the fact that they are SEPARATE problems, each with its
+  // own fix, rather than one problem described three ways.
+  const segments = [];
+  if (gitCount > 0) {
+    const gitReasonNames = gitReasons.map(([r]) => `"${r}"`).join(' and ');
+    segments.push(`${gitCount} of them are ${gitReasonNames} — strict mode requires a real git repository; ` +
+      `run \`git init && git add -A && git commit\`, or scan a real \`git clone\`.`);
+  }
+  if (supplyChainCount > 0) {
+    segments.push(`${supplyChainCount} of them describe an ABSENT dependency declaration (unpinned version / ` +
+      `missing lockfile) with no origin commit to resolve — a known, permanent limitation, not something a ` +
+      `rerun will fix.`);
+  }
+  if (notYetWiredCount > 0) {
+    segments.push(`${notYetWiredCount} of them point at a real source location this engine can't yet trace ` +
+      `back to a commit — an ordinary coverage gap, not a permanent limitation, but not fixable from your side.`);
+  }
+  if (otherCount > 0) {
+    if (otherReasons.length === 1) {
+      segments.push(`${otherCount} share the reason "${otherReasons[0][0]}".`);
+    } else {
+      const breakdown = otherReasons.slice(0, 5).map(([reason, n]) => `${n}× "${reason}"`).join(', ');
+      segments.push(`${otherCount} break down as: ${breakdown}${otherReasons.length > 5 ? ', …' : ''}.`);
+    }
+  }
+  const bullets = segments.map((s) => `  - ${s}`).join('\n');
+  return `${base} — MULTIPLE distinct reasons, not just one:\n${bullets}\nEvery category above must be ` +
+    `resolved for strict to pass (or drop to --assurance standard/advisory) — fixing only one will surface the ` +
+    `next on your following run.`;
+}
+
+/**
+ * @param {string} mode - one of ASSURANCE_MODES; invalid/missing degrades to the default.
+ * @param {object|null} scanHealth - the engine's computed scan.scanHealth (FR-206).
+ * @returns {{ok: boolean, mode: string, reason: string|null, conditions: string[]}}
+ *   ok:false only ever happens in strict mode; advisory/standard always ok:true
+ *   (they report, they do not gate).
+ */
+function evaluateAssuranceMode(mode, scanHealth, findings = []) {
+  const effectiveMode = _isValidMode(mode) ? mode : DEFAULT_ASSURANCE_MODE;
+  const conditions = Array.isArray(scanHealth?.conditions) ? scanHealth.conditions : [];
+
+  if (effectiveMode !== 'strict') {
+    return { ok: true, mode: effectiveMode, reason: null, conditions };
+  }
+
+  // Strict: any of the ledger's three non-"completed" analyzer outcomes,
+  // OR an annotator error / deep-mode failure (scanHealth's OTHER,
+  // non-analyzer conditions) -- "a required analyzer... is unavailable, or
+  // is silently skipped" covers more than just coverage-ledger.js's own
+  // per-detector accounting; a scan whose ANY known-good signal degraded
+  // is not "complete" under strict's own definition.
+  const status = scanHealth?.status;
+  if (!scanHealth || status !== 'complete') {
+    const a = scanHealth?.analyzers;
+    const parts = [];
+    if (a?.failed > 0) parts.push(`${a.failed} analyzer(s) failed`);
+    if (a?.timedOut > 0) parts.push(`${a.timedOut} analyzer(s) timed out`);
+    if (a?.skippedByPolicy > 0) parts.push(`${a.skippedByPolicy} analyzer(s) silently skipped by policy`);
+    const analyzerSummary = parts.length ? ` (${parts.join(', ')})` : '';
+    return {
+      ok: false,
+      mode: 'strict',
+      reason: `strict mode requires a fully complete scan; scanHealth.status is '${status ?? 'unknown'}'${analyzerSummary}`,
+      conditions,
+    };
+  }
+
+  // M2 §2.5: strict cares about overall scan completeness, which now
+  // explicitly includes PROVENANCE completeness, not just detector/analyzer
+  // completeness. A finding whose findingProvenance status is outside
+  // ['complete','uncommitted'] — including a finding with NO
+  // findingProvenance at all, e.g. --no-provenance was used — means strict
+  // cannot vouch for this scan's provenance the same way it already refuses
+  // to vouch for a scan with a failed analyzer.
+  //
+  // KNOWN INTERACTION: scan.secrets/scan.logicVulns are unconditionally
+  // stamped not_available today (M0+M1 deliberately deferred real origin
+  // resolution for those two channels — see the M2/M3/M4 design spec's
+  // §2.6). Any real secret or logic finding therefore fails strict mode
+  // until that resolution work lands. This is the literal, intended
+  // consequence of "never false certainty" applied to strict's own
+  // definition, not an oversight — a strict-mode operator with secrets
+  // findings should expect this until M3+ closes that gap.
+  //
+  // This list is INCOMPLETE without scan.supplyChain, and the omission
+  // matters more than the secrets/logic one above because it hits nearly
+  // every real project. engine.js stamps every supplyChain entry
+  // not_available too (see the loop over `supplyChain` right after the
+  // `annotateGitProvenance` calls), and that bucket covers three distinct
+  // populations, not one:
+  //
+  //  - transitive `vulnerable_dep` findings: a genuine, if currently
+  //    unresolved, DEFERRAL — same shape as secrets/logicVulns above. The
+  //    vulnerable version was never declared in this repo's own manifests,
+  //    so there is no local commit to walk yet, but one could exist to
+  //    resolve in a later phase.
+  //  - `unpinned_dep` / `no_lockfile` findings: a CATEGORY ERROR, not a
+  //    deferral. These describe an ABSENT state (a version range with no
+  //    pin, a manifest with no lockfile) — there is no "commit that
+  //    introduced a missing lockfile" for any future resolver to find,
+  //    because the finding is about the absence of an event, not an event
+  //    itself. No amount of future engineering work makes these resolvable.
+  //
+  // Direct `vulnerable_dep` findings DO go through real origin resolution
+  // (`resolveDirectSCAOrigin`, gated on `isDirect`) and are not part of this
+  // limitation.
+  //
+  // Net effect: because `unpinned_dep`/`no_lockfile` findings are a category
+  // error rather than a deferral, `--assurance strict` will fail on nearly
+  // any real project that has a `package.json` (or equivalent manifest)
+  // today — an unpinned or unlocked dependency is common, and this check has
+  // no way to ever resolve one. This is a known, disclosed limitation of the
+  // current implementation, not a bug, and it is not something this check
+  // should route around: exempting these finding types from the strict-mode
+  // gate was considered and deliberately deferred to a future milestone
+  // rather than done here, so strict mode keeps refusing to vouch for
+  // provenance it cannot actually speak to.
+  const badProvenance = (Array.isArray(findings) ? findings : []).filter((f) => !(0,_posture_provenance_schema_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__/* .isProvenanceHealthy */ .lL)(f?.findingProvenance));
+  if (badProvenance.length > 0) {
+    return {
+      ok: false,
+      mode: 'strict',
+      reason: _provenanceFailureReason(badProvenance, findings.length),
+      conditions,
+    };
+  }
+
+  return { ok: true, mode: 'strict', reason: null, conditions };
+}
+
+const _internals = { _isValidMode, _provenanceFailureReason };
+
+
+/***/ })
+
+};

package/dist/5216.index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+export const id = 5216;
+export const ids = [5216];
+export const modules = {
+
+/***/ 25216:
+/***/ ((__unused_webpack___webpack_module__, __webpack_exports__, __webpack_require__) => {
+
+__webpack_require__.r(__webpack_exports__);
+/* harmony export */ __webpack_require__.d(__webpack_exports__, {
+/* harmony export */   findingKey: () => (/* binding */ findingKey),
+/* harmony export */   latestProof: () => (/* binding */ latestProof),
+/* harmony export */   listProofs: () => (/* binding */ listProofs),
+/* harmony export */   saveProof: () => (/* binding */ saveProof),
+/* harmony export */   scrubDeep: () => (/* binding */ scrubDeep)
+/* harmony export */ });
+/* harmony import */ var node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__ = __webpack_require__(73024);
+/* harmony import */ var node_path__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__ = __webpack_require__(76760);
+/* harmony import */ var _state_dir_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__ = __webpack_require__(69259);
+/* harmony import */ var _encryption_provider_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__ = __webpack_require__(71425);
+/* harmony import */ var _llm_validator_redact_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_4__ = __webpack_require__(98039);
+/* harmony import */ var _reproducer_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_5__ = __webpack_require__(82034);
+// Proof artifact store: `.agentic-security/proofs/<findingKey>/<recordDigest>.json`.
+//
+// Reuses the existing state machinery rather than adding another: `safeWriteState` (refuses unsafe dirs and symlinks),
+// `maybeEncryptForWrite` / `maybeDecryptForRead` (the `proofs` artifact is registered `confidential`), retention
+// (evidence class) and legal holds (a hold on `proofs` blocks purge). Nothing persisted contains a plaintext credential:
+// records are passed through a recursive secret filter first, and the runner never returns its per-run nonce or secrets.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+const PROOF_RECORD_SCHEMA = 'agentic-security/proof-record';
+const PROOFS_DIR = 'proofs';
+const MAX_RECORD_BYTES = 512 * 1024;
+
+const findingKey = (id) => `${String(id).replace(/[^A-Za-z0-9._-]/g, '_').slice(0, 80)}-${(0,_reproducer_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_5__/* .sha256 */ .sc)(String(id)).slice(0, 8)}`;
+
+// The shared redactor catches key=value shapes; bare tokens need their own pass, so persisted evidence cannot carry one.
+const BARE_SECRET_RES = [
+  /\b(?:ghp|gho|ghu|ghs|ghr|github_pat)_[A-Za-z0-9_]{20,}\b/g, /\b(?:AKIA|ASIA)[A-Z0-9]{16}\b/g, /\bsk-[A-Za-z0-9_-]{20,}\b/g,
+  /\bxox[abprs]-[A-Za-z0-9-]{10,}\b/g, /\beyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]{8,}\.[A-Za-z0-9_-]{8,}\.[A-Za-z0-9_-]{8,}\b/g,
+  /-----BEGIN [A-Z ]*PRIVATE KEY-----[\s\S]*?(?:-----END [A-Z ]*PRIVATE KEY-----|$)/g, /\bSECRET-[0-9a-f]{24}-[a-z0-9_-]+\b/g,
+];
+function scrubString(text) {
+  let t = String(text);
+  try { t = (0,_llm_validator_redact_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_4__/* .redactSecrets */ .f)(t).text; } catch { return '[unredactable]'; }
+  for (const re of BARE_SECRET_RES) t = t.replace(re, '[REDACTED-SECRET]');
+  return t;
+}
+
+/** Deep-copy `v` with every string passed through the secret redactor. */
+function scrubDeep(v) {
+  if (typeof v === 'string') return scrubString(v);
+  if (Array.isArray(v)) return v.map(scrubDeep);
+  if (v && typeof v === 'object') return Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(v).map(([k, x]) => [k, scrubDeep(x)]));
+  return v;
+}
+
+function recordDigest(record) {
+  const { recordDigest: _omit, ...rest } = record;
+  return (0,_reproducer_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_5__/* .sha256 */ .sc)((0,_reproducer_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_5__/* .canonicalize */ .dw)(rest));
+}
+
+function saveProof(scanRoot, record) {
+  const safe = scrubDeep(record);
+  safe.schema = PROOF_RECORD_SCHEMA;
+  safe.recordDigest = recordDigest(safe);
+  const text = JSON.stringify(safe, null, 2);
+  if (Buffer.byteLength(text) > MAX_RECORD_BYTES) return { ok: false, reason: 'proof record exceeds the size limit' };
+  if (!(0,_state_dir_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__/* .ensureStateDir */ .xH)(scanRoot)) return { ok: false, reason: 'no safe state directory for this project' };
+  const enc = (0,_encryption_provider_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__/* .maybeEncryptForWrite */ .v2)(scanRoot, PROOFS_DIR, text);
+  if (!enc.ok) return { ok: false, reason: enc.reason };
+  const file = (0,_state_dir_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__.statePath)(scanRoot, PROOFS_DIR, findingKey(record.findingId), `${safe.recordDigest}.json`);
+  if (!(0,_state_dir_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__.safeWriteState)(file, enc.content)) return { ok: false, reason: 'state write refused' };
+  return { ok: true, file, digest: safe.recordDigest, encrypted: enc.encrypted };
+}
+
+function readRecord(file) {
+  const text = (0,_encryption_provider_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__.maybeDecryptForRead)(node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__.readFileSync(file, 'utf8'));
+  const rec = JSON.parse(text);
+  // A record whose content no longer matches its own digest was modified after it was written.
+  if (rec.recordDigest !== recordDigest(rec)) return { tampered: true, record: rec };
+  return { tampered: false, record: rec };
+}
+
+/** Newest-first records for a finding. Tampered records are returned flagged, never silently dropped or trusted. */
+function listProofs(scanRoot, findingId) {
+  const dir = (0,_state_dir_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__.statePath)(scanRoot, PROOFS_DIR, findingKey(findingId));
+  let names = [];
+  try { names = node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__.readdirSync(dir).filter((n) => n.endsWith('.json')); } catch { return []; }
+  const out = [];
+  for (const n of names) {
+    const f = node_path__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__.join(dir, n);
+    try { const { tampered, record } = readRecord(f); out.push({ file: f, tampered, record, mtime: node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__.statSync(f).mtimeMs }); } catch { out.push({ file: f, tampered: true, record: null, mtime: 0 }); }
+  }
+  return out.sort((a, b) => b.mtime - a.mtime);
+}
+
+function latestProof(scanRoot, findingId) {
+  return listProofs(scanRoot, findingId).find((p) => p.record) ?? null;
+}
+
+
+/***/ })
+
+};