@clear-capabilities/agentic-security-scanner 0.150.1 → 0.150.2

package/dist/7838.index.js

@@ -0,0 +1,1037 @@
+export const id = 7838;
+export const ids = [7838,2238];
+export const modules = {
+
+/***/ 27785:
+/***/ ((__unused_webpack___webpack_module__, __webpack_exports__, __webpack_require__) => {
+
+/* harmony export */ __webpack_require__.d(__webpack_exports__, {
+/* harmony export */   _u: () => (/* binding */ gateFixOutput)
+/* harmony export */ });
+/* unused harmony exports checkResidualHonesty, requireCitedEvidence, computeFixTier, checkMechanicalTierEvidence, _internals */
+// Deterministic honesty gates on fix / finding output (#7).
+//
+// The project's verification discipline (scanner/CLAUDE.md) exists because
+// several releases shipped broken or false because work was reported as done
+// without confirming the artifact changed. Two of those failure modes are
+// *textual* — they live in the prose an agent emits alongside a fix — and can
+// be caught deterministically, with no LLM and no network:
+//
+//   1. Hand-wave residual-risk prose. "The input is adequately handled",
+//      "future work", "tbd", "later" — vague assurances that claim safety
+//      without naming a concrete remaining vector. A residual you can't name
+//      is a residual you're guessing about; reject the guess.
+//
+//   2. An unbacked "this is a false positive / provably safe" verdict. Marking
+//      a finding safe is a coverage *reduction* — it must cite a `file:line`
+//      that shows why, exactly like the rules-override gate refuses to silently
+//      shrink coverage.
+//
+// Plus a conservative fix-tier classifier so a partial remediation can never be
+// labelled FULL: any workaround-only signal (rate-limit, docs, log-without-
+// reject) is WORKAROUND; anything short of (sink signature changed + all callers
+// routed + a discriminating test) is at most MITIGATION; only the full set with
+// no partial-sanitization caveat earns FULL.
+//
+// Pure functions, no side effects, no throwing — safe to call from a command,
+// a hook, or the MCP verify_fix path.
+
+// Vague-assurance phrases that a real residual must never hide behind. Matched
+// case-insensitively with word boundaries so "later" doesn't trip on
+// "collateral" and "tbd" doesn't trip on a longer token.
+const BANNED_RESIDUAL_PHRASES = Object.freeze([
+  'adequately handled',
+  'adequately handles',
+  'properly validated',
+  'properly handled',
+  'handled properly',
+  'handled safely',
+  'future work',
+  'more work needed',
+  'to be done',
+  'tbd',
+  'later',
+]);
+
+// A citation shaped like `file:line` — one or more non-space, non-colon chars,
+// a colon, then digits. Unanchored: it need only appear somewhere in the item.
+const CITATION_RE = /[^\s:]+:\d+/;
+
+// Verdicts that assert the finding is not real and therefore demand a citation.
+// Compared after normalizing separators (`_`/space → `-`) and lowercasing, so
+// FALSE_POSITIVE, false-positive, and "provably safe" all land here.
+const FP_VERDICTS = Object.freeze(new Set(['false-positive', 'provably-safe', 'safe']));
+
+function _escapeRe(s) {
+  return s.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&');
+}
+
+/**
+ * Reject vague-assurance / hand-wave residual-risk prose.
+ *
+ * An empty or whitespace-only residual is ok — there is no residual to lie
+ * about. A non-empty residual is rejected when it contains any banned phrase;
+ * each match yields one violation naming the offending phrase.
+ *
+ * @param {string} residualText
+ * @returns {{ ok: boolean, violations: string[] }}
+ */
+function checkResidualHonesty(residualText) {
+  const text = typeof residualText === 'string' ? residualText : '';
+  if (text.trim() === '') return { ok: true, violations: [] };
+
+  const violations = [];
+  for (const phrase of BANNED_RESIDUAL_PHRASES) {
+    const re = new RegExp(`\\b${_escapeRe(phrase)}\\b`, 'i');
+    if (re.test(text)) {
+      violations.push(`vague-assurance phrase: "${phrase}"`);
+    }
+  }
+  return { ok: violations.length === 0, violations };
+}
+
+function _isCitation(item) {
+  if (typeof item === 'string') return CITATION_RE.test(item);
+  if (item && typeof item === 'object' && typeof item.location === 'string') {
+    return CITATION_RE.test(item.location);
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+function _normalizeVerdict(verdict) {
+  return String(verdict).trim().toLowerCase().replace(/[_\s]+/g, '-');
+}
+
+/**
+ * Require a file:line citation behind a "this is not real" verdict.
+ *
+ * For a false-positive / provably-safe / safe verdict (case-insensitive; also
+ * accepts FALSE_POSITIVE), at least one evidence item must be a `file:line`
+ * citation — either a string matching /[^\s:]+:\d+/ or an object
+ * `{ location: "file:line" }`. Any other verdict passes unconditionally.
+ *
+ * @param {string} verdict
+ * @param {Array|string|object} evidence
+ * @returns {{ ok: boolean, violations: string[] }}
+ */
+function requireCitedEvidence(verdict, evidence) {
+  if (typeof verdict !== 'string' || !FP_VERDICTS.has(_normalizeVerdict(verdict))) {
+    return { ok: true, violations: [] };
+  }
+  const items = Array.isArray(evidence)
+    ? evidence
+    : evidence == null
+      ? []
+      : [evidence];
+  if (items.some(_isCitation)) return { ok: true, violations: [] };
+  return {
+    ok: false,
+    violations: ['false-positive/safe verdict requires a file:line citation'],
+  };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Classify a fix into FULL | MITIGATION | WORKAROUND, conservative-first.
+ *
+ * @param {object} signals
+ * @param {boolean} signals.sinkSignatureChanged
+ * @param {boolean} signals.allCallersRouted
+ * @param {boolean} signals.testDiscriminates - a test that fails pre-fix, passes post-fix
+ * @param {boolean} [signals.rateLimitOnly]
+ * @param {boolean} [signals.docsOnly]
+ * @param {boolean} [signals.logOnlyNoReject]
+ * @param {boolean} [signals.partialSanitization]
+ * @returns {'FULL'|'MITIGATION'|'WORKAROUND'}
+ */
+function computeFixTier(signals) {
+  const s = signals && typeof signals === 'object' ? signals : {};
+  if (s.rateLimitOnly || s.docsOnly || s.logOnlyNoReject) return 'WORKAROUND';
+  const complete = s.sinkSignatureChanged && s.allCallersRouted && s.testDiscriminates;
+  if (s.partialSanitization || !complete) return 'MITIGATION';
+  return 'FULL';
+}
+
+/**
+ * FR-308: cross-check a fix-completeness TIER against MECHANICAL evidence,
+ * when any is available. `signals` (computeFixTier's input) is agent-
+ * self-reported — this module cannot compute sinkSignatureChanged /
+ * allCallersRouted / testDiscriminates itself (see the header above: "the
+ * gate can only run against claims the AGENT self-reports... nothing here
+ * is server-computable"). `pocLeg` is different: fix-verify.js's PoC leg is
+ * a REAL execution result (posture/CLAUDE.md's execution-proof tiers), not
+ * a claim. When it is available and shows the proof-of-concept STILL
+ * demonstrates the vulnerability against the patch, a self-reported FULL
+ * tier is not merely internally inconsistent — it is REFUTED by fact. This
+ * is the literal "a mitigation or workaround cannot be represented as a
+ * full fix" acceptance criterion, now backed by mechanical evidence where
+ * it exists rather than by self-report consistency alone.
+ *
+ * A `pocLeg` of `not-requested` or `inconclusive` carries no mechanical
+ * signal either way and is a no-op here — this check can only ever ADD a
+ * violation on real contrary evidence, never manufacture one from absence.
+ *
+ * @param {string} tier
+ * @param {{status: string, reason?: string}|null} pocLeg
+ * @returns {{ ok: boolean, violations: string[] }}
+ */
+function checkMechanicalTierEvidence(tier, pocLeg) {
+  if (!pocLeg || typeof pocLeg !== 'object') return { ok: true, violations: [] };
+  if (tier === 'FULL' && pocLeg.status === 'still-exploitable') {
+    return {
+      ok: false,
+      violations: [`tier 'FULL' is refuted by mechanical evidence: the proof-of-concept still demonstrates the vulnerability against the patch${pocLeg.reason ? ` (${pocLeg.reason})` : ''}`],
+    };
+  }
+  return { ok: true, violations: [] };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Compose the four gates for a single fix's output.
+ *
+ * ok = residual-honesty ok AND evidence-citation ok AND mechanical-tier-
+ * evidence ok, further constrained by the tier/residual consistency
+ * invariant:
+ *   - a FULL tier must NOT carry a residual (a full fix has nothing left);
+ *   - a non-FULL tier MUST document a residual (say what's still open).
+ *
+ * @param {{ residual?: string, verdict?: string, evidence?: any, signals?: object }} input
+ * @param {{ pocLeg?: object|null }} [mechanical] - FR-308: optional real
+ *   execution evidence (fix-verify.js's pocLeg) to cross-check the
+ *   self-reported tier against. Omitted entirely by any caller that has no
+ *   PoC leg to offer — this parameter never REQUIRES mechanical evidence,
+ *   it only USES it when present.
+ * @returns {{ ok: boolean, tier: string, violations: string[] }}
+ */
+function gateFixOutput({ residual, verdict, evidence, signals } = {}, { pocLeg = null } = {}) {
+  const tier = computeFixTier(signals);
+  const residualCheck = checkResidualHonesty(residual);
+  const evidenceCheck = requireCitedEvidence(verdict, evidence);
+  const mechanicalCheck = checkMechanicalTierEvidence(tier, pocLeg);
+
+  const violations = [...residualCheck.violations, ...evidenceCheck.violations, ...mechanicalCheck.violations];
+  let ok = residualCheck.ok && evidenceCheck.ok && mechanicalCheck.ok;
+
+  const residualEmpty = typeof residual !== 'string' || residual.trim() === '';
+  if (tier === 'FULL' && !residualEmpty) {
+    violations.push('FULL tier cannot carry a residual');
+    ok = false;
+  }
+  if (tier !== 'FULL' && residualEmpty) {
+    violations.push('non-FULL tier must document a residual');
+    ok = false;
+  }
+
+  return { ok, tier, violations };
+}
+
+const _internals = Object.freeze({ BANNED_RESIDUAL_PHRASES, CITATION_RE, FP_VERDICTS });
+
+
+/***/ }),
+
+/***/ 32238:
+/***/ ((__unused_webpack___webpack_module__, __webpack_exports__, __webpack_require__) => {
+
+/* harmony export */ __webpack_require__.d(__webpack_exports__, {
+/* harmony export */   I3: () => (/* binding */ recordFixAttempt),
+/* harmony export */   fixDurationReport: () => (/* binding */ fixDurationReport),
+/* harmony export */   renderFixDurationSummary: () => (/* binding */ renderFixDurationSummary),
+/* harmony export */   sU: () => (/* binding */ loadFixAttempts)
+/* harmony export */ });
+/* unused harmony exports FIX_STAGES, bucketOf, summarizeFixDurations, _internals, summarizeFixAxes, renderFixAxes */
+/* harmony import */ var node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__ = __webpack_require__(73024);
+/* harmony import */ var node_path__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__ = __webpack_require__(76760);
+/* harmony import */ var _state_dir_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__ = __webpack_require__(31174);
+// Time-to-validated-fix (R5, the reporting half).
+//
+// `verifyFix` already RUNS the stages and `test-runner.js` already times the
+// slowest one. What did not exist was anything durable to read afterwards, so
+// "how long does a fix actually take to validate" had no answer from real runs
+// — only an estimate (`time-to-fix.js` guesses engineering hours from family
+// and patch shape, before anything runs). This module is the opposite: it
+// records what the pipeline observed and reports the distribution.
+//
+// THE HONESTY RULES, which are most of why this file is longer than a mean:
+//
+//  1. A failed attempt is NOT a data point about how long a fix takes. Fixes
+//     that fail verification fail fast (a re-scan that still sees the finding
+//     never reaches the test suite), so blending them into one average makes
+//     the pipeline look faster the worse it performs. Validated and failed
+//     attempts are summarised separately and never merged.
+//
+//  2. "Tests skipped" is not "tests passed". A project with no detectable
+//     suite can reach `ok:true` having run only the re-scan and the linter.
+//     That is a weaker claim than a fix whose suite executed, and it is also
+//     much faster, so counting the two together would quietly deflate the
+//     headline. They get their own bucket: `validated` means the suite ran and
+//     passed, `validatedWithoutTests` means there was no suite to run.
+//
+//  3. Every figure carries its `n`, and a percentile computed from too few
+//     samples is labelled unreliable rather than omitted or silently reported.
+//     Same precedent as the accuracy scorecard's `{n, d}` rates: a number
+//     without its denominator is not a measurement.
+//
+// Storage is append-only JSONL at `<scanRoot>/.agentic-security/fix-metrics.jsonl`,
+// one record per verification attempt. Nothing here throws (posture
+// convention) — an unwritable or corrupt log degrades to "no metrics", never
+// to a failed verification.
+
+
+
+
+
+const LOG_FILE = 'fix-metrics.jsonl';
+
+// Below this many samples a percentile is an artifact of the sample, not a
+// property of the pipeline. Reported anyway (hiding it invites re-deriving it
+// wrong downstream) but flagged, so a caller cannot quote it as settled.
+const RELIABLE_N = 10;
+
+// The stages verifyFix runs, in execution order. Kept here so the recorder and
+// the summariser cannot drift apart on stage naming.
+const FIX_STAGES = Object.freeze(['rescan', 'lint', 'tests', 'honesty', 'poc']);
+
+function _logPath(scanRoot) {
+  return (0,_state_dir_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__.statePath)(scanRoot, LOG_FILE);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Append one verification attempt. Best-effort and silent on failure: metrics
+ * must never be able to fail a fix that otherwise verified.
+ *
+ * @returns {boolean} whether the record was written (for tests, not callers).
+ */
+function recordFixAttempt(scanRoot, record) {
+  if (!scanRoot || !record || typeof record !== 'object') return false;
+  try {
+    const dir = (0,_state_dir_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__/* .stateDir */ .Pn)(scanRoot);
+    if (!(0,_state_dir_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__.isSafeStateDir)(dir)) return false;
+    if (!(0,_state_dir_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__.stateWritesEnabled)()) return false;
+  node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true });
+    // One writeSync of one newline-terminated line: a concurrent reader sees
+    // whole records or nothing, and a torn tail is dropped on read.
+    node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__.appendFileSync(_logPath(scanRoot), JSON.stringify(record) + '\n', 'utf8');
+    return true;
+  } catch { return false; }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Read every well-formed attempt. A line that does not parse is skipped, not
+ * fatal — the last line of an interrupted write is the expected case.
+ */
+function loadFixAttempts(scanRoot) {
+  try {
+    const raw = node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__.readFileSync(_logPath(scanRoot), 'utf8');
+    const out = [];
+    for (const line of raw.split('\n')) {
+      if (!line.trim()) continue;
+      try {
+        const rec = JSON.parse(line);
+        if (rec && typeof rec === 'object' && typeof rec.totalMs === 'number') out.push(rec);
+      } catch { /* torn or hand-edited line — drop it, keep the rest */ }
+    }
+    return out;
+  } catch { return []; }
+}
+
+// Nearest-rank percentile over an ascending array. Nearest-rank rather than
+// interpolated because these are observed durations, and an interpolated p50
+// reports a duration that no run actually took.
+function _pct(sorted, p) {
+  if (!sorted.length) return null;
+  const rank = Math.ceil((p / 100) * sorted.length);
+  return sorted[Math.min(sorted.length - 1, Math.max(0, rank - 1))];
+}
+
+function _dist(values) {
+  const v = values.filter(x => typeof x === 'number' && Number.isFinite(x) && x >= 0).sort((a, b) => a - b);
+  if (!v.length) return { n: 0, minMs: null, p50Ms: null, p90Ms: null, maxMs: null, meanMs: null, reliable: false };
+  const sum = v.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
+  return {
+    n: v.length,
+    minMs: v[0],
+    p50Ms: _pct(v, 50),
+    p90Ms: _pct(v, 90),
+    maxMs: v[v.length - 1],
+    meanMs: Math.round(sum / v.length),
+    // Says whether the percentiles above may be quoted, not whether the count
+    // is real. n and min/max/mean are exact at any sample size.
+    reliable: v.length >= RELIABLE_N,
+  };
+}
+
+// Which bucket an attempt belongs to. Deliberately total: every attempt lands
+// in exactly one, so the bucket counts always sum to the attempt count and a
+// mis-shaped record cannot silently vanish from the denominator.
+function bucketOf(a) {
+  if (!a?.ok) return 'failed';
+  return a.testsRan ? 'validated' : 'validatedWithoutTests';
+}
+
+/**
+ * Summarise a set of attempts into the reported distribution.
+ *
+ * `validated` is the headline: attempts that verified AND whose test suite
+ * actually ran and passed. The other two buckets exist so that headline cannot
+ * be inflated by counting weaker or faster outcomes inside it.
+ */
+function summarizeFixDurations(attempts) {
+  const all = Array.isArray(attempts) ? attempts : [];
+  const buckets = { validated: [], validatedWithoutTests: [], failed: [] };
+  for (const a of all) buckets[bucketOf(a)].push(a);
+
+  const byStage = {};
+  for (const stage of FIX_STAGES) {
+    // Per-stage timings come from validated runs only. A stage's duration in a
+    // failed run is truncated by the failure (the pipeline stops), so mixing
+    // them in would understate every stage after the first failure point.
+    byStage[stage] = _dist(buckets.validated.map(a => a?.stages?.[stage]));
+  }
+
+  return {
+    attempts: all.length,
+    counts: {
+      validated: buckets.validated.length,
+      validatedWithoutTests: buckets.validatedWithoutTests.length,
+      failed: buckets.failed.length,
+    },
+    timeToValidatedFix: _dist(buckets.validated.map(a => a.totalMs)),
+    timeToValidatedFixWithoutTests: _dist(buckets.validatedWithoutTests.map(a => a.totalMs)),
+    timeToFailure: _dist(buckets.failed.map(a => a.totalMs)),
+    byStage,
+    reliableAtOrAbove: RELIABLE_N,
+  };
+}
+
+/** Read + summarise in one step. */
+function fixDurationReport(scanRoot) {
+  return summarizeFixDurations(loadFixAttempts(scanRoot));
+}
+
+function _ms(v) {
+  if (v == null) return '—';
+  return v >= 1000 ? `${(v / 1000).toFixed(1)}s` : `${v}ms`;
+}
+
+/**
+ * One-paragraph human summary. Returns null when there is nothing measured —
+ * callers print nothing rather than printing an empty table.
+ */
+function renderFixDurationSummary(sum) {
+  if (!sum || !sum.attempts) return null;
+  const d = sum.timeToValidatedFix;
+  const parts = [];
+  if (d.n) {
+    parts.push(
+      `time-to-validated-fix: median ${_ms(d.p50Ms)}, p90 ${_ms(d.p90Ms)} `
+      + `(n=${d.n}${d.reliable ? '' : `, below ${sum.reliableAtOrAbove} — percentiles not yet reliable`})`,
+    );
+  } else {
+    parts.push('time-to-validated-fix: no fix has both verified and had its test suite run yet');
+  }
+  if (sum.counts.validatedWithoutTests) {
+    parts.push(`${sum.counts.validatedWithoutTests} verified with no detectable test suite (excluded from the median above)`);
+  }
+  if (sum.counts.failed) {
+    parts.push(`${sum.counts.failed} failed verification, median ${_ms(sum.timeToFailure.p50Ms)} (counted separately)`);
+  }
+  return parts.join('; ') + '.';
+}
+
+const _internals = { _dist, _pct, RELIABLE_N };
+
+
+// ── PRD F6.1 — score fixes on THREE AXES, not one ──────────────────────────
+//
+// The three axes the PRD names:
+//   (a) does the finding disappear      — the rescan leg
+//   (b) does the project's own suite pass — the tests leg
+//   (c) does an independent verifier agree — the PoC re-check leg
+//
+// All three were already computed by verifyFixCore and then collapsed into one
+// boolean, which is the problem: **(a) alone is satisfiable by deleting code.**
+// A patch that removes the vulnerable function passes the rescan, has nothing
+// left to fail, and — on a project with no detectable test suite — reaches
+// ok:true having proven only that the detector went quiet.
+//
+// Reporting the axes separately makes that visible. `aOnly` is the number that
+// matters most and the one nobody was publishing: attempts that satisfied ONLY
+// the disappearance axis. A high aOnly with a high headline is the shape of a
+// remediation feature that is deleting code and calling it a fix.
+function summarizeFixAxes(attempts) {
+  const list = Array.isArray(attempts) ? attempts.filter(Boolean) : [];
+  const d = list.length;
+
+  const rate = (pred) => ({ n: list.filter(pred).length, d });
+
+  // Each axis is judged INDEPENDENTLY of the overall verdict, so a leg that
+  // passed inside a failed attempt still counts for its own axis. Reading them
+  // off `ok` would make the three axes three copies of the same number.
+  const findingDisappeared = rate((a) => a.rescanOk === true || (a.ok === true && a.rescanOk !== false));
+  const testsStillPass = rate((a) => a.testsRan === true && a.testsOk !== false);
+  const verifierAgrees = rate((a) => a.pocOk === true);
+
+  const satisfiesAll = rate((a) =>
+    (a.rescanOk === true || (a.ok === true && a.rescanOk !== false))
+    && a.testsRan === true && a.testsOk !== false
+    && a.pocOk === true);
+
+  // The honesty number: disappearance WITHOUT either corroborating axis.
+  const aOnly = rate((a) => {
+    const disappeared = a.rescanOk === true || (a.ok === true && a.rescanOk !== false);
+    const corroborated = (a.testsRan === true && a.testsOk !== false) || a.pocOk === true;
+    return disappeared && !corroborated;
+  });
+
+  return {
+    total: d,
+    findingDisappeared,
+    testsStillPass,
+    verifierAgrees,
+    satisfiesAll,
+    aOnly,
+    meaning:
+      'findingDisappeared = the detector went quiet; testsStillPass = the project suite ran AND passed; '
+      + 'verifierAgrees = an independent PoC re-check confirmed the hole is shut. '
+      + 'aOnly counts attempts that satisfied ONLY disappearance — the shape a code-deleting "fix" produces.',
+    caveat: d === 0
+      ? 'no attempts recorded; every rate is 0/0 and means nothing'
+      : 'rates carry {n,d}; a small d is indicative, not settled',
+  };
+}
+
+/** Markdown for a report. Denominators always attached. */
+function renderFixAxes(sum) {
+  if (!sum || !sum.total) return '_No fix attempts recorded._\n';
+  const row = (label, r, note) => `| ${label} | ${r.n}/${r.d} | ${note} |`;
+  return [
+    '| Axis | Rate | Meaning |',
+    '|---|---|---|',
+    row('(a) finding disappeared', sum.findingDisappeared, 'the detector went quiet'),
+    row('(b) project tests pass', sum.testsStillPass, 'the suite RAN and passed'),
+    row('(c) verifier agrees', sum.verifierAgrees, 'an independent PoC re-check confirmed it'),
+    row('all three', sum.satisfiesAll, 'the only row that means "fixed"'),
+    row('(a) ALONE', sum.aOnly, 'satisfiable by deleting code — watch this number'),
+    '',
+  ].join('\n');
+}
+
+
+/***/ }),
+
+/***/ 27838:
+/***/ ((__webpack_module__, __webpack_exports__, __webpack_require__) => {
+
+__webpack_require__.a(__webpack_module__, async (__webpack_handle_async_dependencies__, __webpack_async_result__) => { try {
+__webpack_require__.r(__webpack_exports__);
+/* harmony export */ __webpack_require__.d(__webpack_exports__, {
+/* harmony export */   runProjectLinter: () => (/* binding */ runProjectLinter),
+/* harmony export */   verifyFix: () => (/* binding */ verifyFix),
+/* harmony export */   verifyPatch: () => (/* binding */ verifyPatch)
+/* harmony export */ });
+/* harmony import */ var node_child_process__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__ = __webpack_require__(31421);
+/* harmony import */ var node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__ = __webpack_require__(73024);
+/* harmony import */ var node_path__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__ = __webpack_require__(76760);
+/* harmony import */ var _engine_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__ = __webpack_require__(67198);
+/* harmony import */ var _fix_honesty_gate_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_4__ = __webpack_require__(27785);
+/* harmony import */ var _test_runner_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_5__ = __webpack_require__(35136);
+/* harmony import */ var _fix_metrics_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_6__ = __webpack_require__(32238);
+var __webpack_async_dependencies__ = __webpack_handle_async_dependencies__([_engine_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__]);
+_engine_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__ = (__webpack_async_dependencies__.then ? (await __webpack_async_dependencies__)() : __webpack_async_dependencies__)[0];
+// Closed-loop /fix verification (Sentinel-parity FR-L4-4, FR-L4-5).
+//
+// Given a candidate patch (the new file content + the finding stableId being
+// fixed), verify it:
+//
+//   1. The original finding's stableId no longer fires on the patched file.
+//   2. No new findings at severity ≥ medium were introduced by the patch.
+//   3. The project's existing linter (when present) passes on the patched file.
+//   4. The project's own test suite (when detectable) still passes. This is
+//      the R5 gap-closer: a patch that silently deletes the feature would
+//      satisfy (1) and (2) just as well as a real fix — only running the
+//      tests catches that. See `test-runner.js` for detection + execution.
+//
+// If any of those fail, the caller is expected to NOT apply the patch and
+// instead surface a "fix plan" — a numbered list of steps the engineer can
+// follow — rather than dump a broken patch on the user.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+const SEVERITY_RANK = { critical: 0, high: 1, medium: 2, low: 3, info: 4 };
+
+// Run a focused re-scan over just the patched file(s) using the in-memory
+// engine. No filesystem write needed — we hand the new content in via the
+// fileContents map.
+async function verifyPatch({
+  scanRoot,
+  originalFindingStableId,
+  files,   // { [relPath]: newContent }
+  depFileContents = {},
+} = {}) {
+  if (!files || typeof files !== 'object') return { ok: false, reason: 'no-files-provided' };
+  const fileContents = { ...files };
+  let scan;
+  try {
+    // `provenance:false` is REQUIRED here, not an optimisation. This scan is
+    // deliberately scoped to just the patched file(s), so its finding set is a
+    // tiny subset of the project's. updateLifecycle marks every open stableId
+    // NOT in the set it is handed as `remediated` — so a single fix
+    // verification (every /fix, apply_fix, and autopilot iteration runs one)
+    // would mass-mark the rest of the project as remediated, then
+    // `reintroduced` on the next real scan. The patched content is also not
+    // committed, so there is no history to resolve provenance against anyway.
+    scan = await (0,_engine_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__/* .runFullScan */ .wW)({ fileContents, depFileContents, scanRoot, provenance: false }, () => {});
+  } catch (e) {
+    return { ok: false, reason: 'rescan-failed', error: e.message };
+  }
+  const findings = (scan && scan.findings) || [];
+  const stillHasOriginal = !!originalFindingStableId &&
+    findings.some(f => f.stableId === originalFindingStableId);
+  if (stillHasOriginal) {
+    return { ok: false, reason: 'original-finding-still-present', stableId: originalFindingStableId };
+  }
+  const introducedHighOrAbove = findings.filter(f =>
+    (SEVERITY_RANK[f.severity] ?? 9) <= SEVERITY_RANK.medium);
+  // Don't count findings on lines outside the patched files — but our
+  // fileContents map IS the patched files, so every finding is in-scope.
+  return {
+    ok: introducedHighOrAbove.length === 0,
+    reason: introducedHighOrAbove.length === 0 ? 'verified' : 'introduced-new-findings',
+    introduced: introducedHighOrAbove.map(f => ({
+      vuln: f.vuln, file: f.file, line: f.line, severity: f.severity,
+      stableId: f.stableId,
+    })),
+  };
+}
+
+// Detect which linter the project uses and run it on the patched files.
+// Returns { ok, runner, output } or { ok: true, runner: 'none' } when no
+// linter is configured (silent pass).
+function runProjectLinter(scanRoot, filePaths) {
+  if (!scanRoot || !Array.isArray(filePaths) || filePaths.length === 0) {
+    return { ok: true, runner: 'none' };
+  }
+  const has = (p) => { try { return node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__.existsSync(node_path__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__.join(scanRoot, p)); } catch { return false; } };
+  // Pick the linter by config file present in the repo root.
+  const jsFiles = filePaths.filter(f => /\.(?:js|jsx|ts|tsx|mjs|cjs)$/i.test(f));
+  const pyFiles = filePaths.filter(f => /\.py$/i.test(f));
+  const goFiles = filePaths.filter(f => /\.go$/i.test(f));
+  const javaFiles = filePaths.filter(f => /\.java$/i.test(f));
+
+  if (jsFiles.length && (has('.eslintrc') || has('.eslintrc.json') || has('.eslintrc.js') || has('eslint.config.js') || has('eslint.config.mjs'))) {
+    return runLinter(scanRoot, 'eslint', ['--no-error-on-unmatched-pattern', ...jsFiles]);
+  }
+  if (pyFiles.length && (has('pyproject.toml') || has('ruff.toml') || has('.ruff.toml'))) {
+    return runLinter(scanRoot, 'ruff', ['check', ...pyFiles]);
+  }
+  if (pyFiles.length && has('.flake8')) {
+    return runLinter(scanRoot, 'flake8', pyFiles);
+  }
+  if (goFiles.length && (has('.golangci.yml') || has('.golangci.yaml'))) {
+    return runLinter(scanRoot, 'golangci-lint', ['run', ...goFiles]);
+  }
+  if (javaFiles.length && has('checkstyle.xml')) {
+    return runLinter(scanRoot, 'checkstyle', ['-c', 'checkstyle.xml', ...javaFiles]);
+  }
+  return { ok: true, runner: 'none' };
+}
+
+function runLinter(cwd, cmd, args) {
+  let r;
+  try {
+    r = (0,node_child_process__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__.spawnSync)(cmd, args, { cwd, encoding: 'utf8', timeout: 60_000 });
+  } catch (e) {
+    return { ok: true, runner: cmd, skipped: true, reason: 'binary-missing', error: e.message };
+  }
+  if (r.error && r.error.code === 'ENOENT') {
+    return { ok: true, runner: cmd, skipped: true, reason: 'binary-missing' };
+  }
+  if (r.status === null) {
+    return { ok: false, runner: cmd, reason: 'timed-out', output: (r.stderr || r.stdout || '').slice(-2000) };
+  }
+  return {
+    ok: r.status === 0,
+    runner: cmd,
+    exitCode: r.status,
+    output: ((r.stderr || '') + (r.stdout || '')).slice(-2000),
+  };
+}
+
+// Top-level verify: re-scan + lint. Returns the combined verdict + a
+// human-readable summary string suitable for surfacing to the user.
+// Addition #7 — deterministic honesty gates on fix output. When the caller
+// supplies `fixMeta` ({ residual, verdict, evidence, signals }) — e.g. the
+// security-fixer agent's residual-risk text + completeness signals — the fix's
+// claims are checked mechanically (no hand-wave residual prose, a cited
+// file:line for any FP/safe verdict, and a FULL/MITIGATION/WORKAROUND tier). A
+// dishonest or over-claiming fix fails the gate. When `fixMeta` is absent
+// (the deterministic MCP write path, which has no claims to check) the honesty
+// gate is skipped and behavior is unchanged.
+// R5 (partial) — the test-suite stage. Runs the target project's own tests,
+// in the target project's own directory, against whatever is currently on
+// disk there. See `test-runner.js`'s header comment for why that run is
+// deliberately NOT routed through the R1 PoC-confinement sandbox: this is
+// the project's own already-trusted suite, not untrusted synthesized code.
+//
+// Caveat that matters for callers: `verifyPatch` above re-scans the
+// candidate patch purely in memory (no write to disk), but a test runner
+// needs real files — there is no cheap way to hand a runner an in-memory
+// overlay. So this leg reports on the CURRENT on-disk tree, not the
+// candidate `files` map, when `verifyFix` is used as a pre-write preview
+// (e.g. the `verify_fix` MCP tool). Callers that apply the patch first and
+// then re-verify get the strongest signal; that ordering is not enforced
+// here — it's the caller's responsibility, same as it already is for the
+// closed-loop `fix-verify-loop.js` path.
+// Does the caller's candidate patch differ from what is on disk right now?
+// If so, any test run necessarily exercised the pre-patch tree. Compared by
+// content so a patch that happens to match disk (already applied) is correctly
+// treated as NOT pre-patch.
+function _candidateDiffersFromDisk(scanRoot, files) {
+  if (!files || typeof files !== 'object') return false;
+  for (const [rel, content] of Object.entries(files)) {
+    if (typeof content !== 'string') continue;
+    try {
+      const abs = node_path__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__.resolve(scanRoot, rel);
+      if (node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__.readFileSync(abs, 'utf8') !== content) return true;
+    } catch {
+      return true; // candidate file absent on disk -> definitely not applied
+    }
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+async function verifyFix({
+  scanRoot,
+  originalFindingStableId,
+  files,
+  depFileContents,
+  fixMeta,
+  testTimeoutMs,
+  recordMetrics = true,
+  poc,
+} = {}) {
+  // R5 (reporting half) — time each stage as it runs. Measured here rather
+  // than inside each stage because only this function knows the boundaries of
+  // one verification ATTEMPT, which is the unit the distribution is over.
+  const stages = {};
+  const t0 = Date.now();
+  let mark = t0;
+  const _lap = (name) => { const now = Date.now(); stages[name] = now - mark; mark = now; };
+
+  const rescan = await verifyPatch({ scanRoot, originalFindingStableId, files, depFileContents });
+  _lap('rescan');
+  const lint = runProjectLinter(scanRoot, Object.keys(files || {}));
+  _lap('lint');
+  const tests = (0,_test_runner_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_5__/* .runProjectTests */ .I)(scanRoot, testTimeoutMs != null ? { timeoutMs: testTimeoutMs } : {});
+  _lap('tests');
+  // True when a candidate patch was supplied but has not been written, so the
+  // suite necessarily ran against the pre-patch tree. Surfaced in the summary
+  // and on the result so a caller cannot mistake it for a verified patch.
+  const _testedPrePatch = !tests.skipped && _candidateDiffersFromDisk(scanRoot, files);
+  const testsOk = tests.skipped ? true : tests.passed === true;
+  // R5 — the PoC leg. Re-run the finding's proof-of-concept against the
+  // CANDIDATE patch inside R1's sandbox. A patch that still lets the PoC
+  // demonstrate the predicted effect has not fixed anything, however green the
+  // re-scan looks: the re-scan only proves the DETECTOR stopped firing, which
+  // a cosmetic edit can achieve. Execution is the stronger claim.
+  //
+  // Direction matters and is asymmetric on purpose. `execution-proven` after
+  // the patch is a hard FAIL. Anything else is NOT a pass — a PoC that failed
+  // to run, or a sandbox that could not start, is recorded as `inconclusive`
+  // and left out of the verdict entirely. Treating "could not prove it" as
+  // "fixed" is exactly the false confidence this leg exists to prevent.
+  //
+  // Computed BEFORE the honesty gate (FR-308): a still-exploitable PoC is
+  // MECHANICAL evidence, not a self-report, and gateFixOutput cross-checks a
+  // self-reported FULL tier against it below — the ordering matters, not
+  // just the value.
+  let pocLeg = { status: 'not-requested', reason: null, tier: null };
+  if (poc?.code) {
+    try {
+      const { proveFinding } = await Promise.resolve(/* import() */).then(__webpack_require__.bind(__webpack_require__, 1291));
+      const proved = await proveFinding({ ...(poc.finding || {}), poc }, { files });
+      const tier = proved.proofTier;
+      pocLeg = tier === 'execution-proven'
+        ? { status: 'still-exploitable', tier, reason: proved.proofEvidence?.observed || null }
+        : proved.proofEvidence?.ran
+          ? { status: 'no-longer-proven', tier, reason: proved.proofEvidence?.reason || null }
+          : { status: 'inconclusive', tier, reason: proved.proofEvidence?.reason || null };
+    } catch (e) {
+      pocLeg = { status: 'inconclusive', tier: null, reason: `proof harness error: ${e.message}` };
+    }
+  }
+  _lap('poc');
+  const pocOk = pocLeg.status !== 'still-exploitable';
+
+  // FR-308: "a mitigation or workaround cannot be represented as a full
+  // fix" — gateFixOutput's tier/residual check is a pure self-consistency
+  // check (fixMeta.signals is agent-self-reported; see fix-honesty-gate.js's
+  // header for why nothing there is server-computable). pocLeg IS
+  // server-computable — a real execution result, not a claim — so it is
+  // passed through as the one MECHANICAL cross-check available: a
+  // self-reported FULL tier is refuted, not just internally inconsistent,
+  // when the PoC still demonstrates the vulnerability against the patch.
+  // D-0024: `fixMeta` is a shared envelope — FR-307/FR-1002's `approval`
+  // key lives alongside FR-308's completeness self-report (`residual`/
+  // `verdict`/`evidence`/`signals`). Gating on mere object-truthiness meant
+  // a caller supplying ONLY `approval` (a real, common shape once the CLI's
+  // --approved-by flag and the MCP schema fix made that reachable) got
+  // silently gated on an UNRELATED FR-308 self-consistency check it never
+  // engaged with — computeFixTier(undefined) defaults to MITIGATION, which
+  // then demands a `residual` nobody was ever asked to supply, blocking an
+  // otherwise-genuine, approved fix for a reason that has nothing to do
+  // with completeness honesty. Scope the gate to fixMeta shapes that
+  // actually make a completeness-adjacent claim.
+  const hasHonestyClaim = fixMeta && typeof fixMeta === 'object' &&
+    (fixMeta.residual !== undefined || fixMeta.verdict !== undefined ||
+     fixMeta.evidence !== undefined || fixMeta.signals !== undefined);
+  let honesty = null;
+  if (hasHonestyClaim) {
+    try { honesty = (0,_fix_honesty_gate_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_4__/* .gateFixOutput */ ._u)(fixMeta, { pocLeg }); } catch { honesty = null; }
+  }
+  _lap('honesty');
+
+  const ok = rescan.ok && (lint.ok || lint.skipped) && testsOk && pocOk && (honesty ? honesty.ok : true);
+
+  // FR-305 (assurance-hardening PRD): `ok` alone conflates "every leg
+  // genuinely ran and passed" with "passed, but a required leg was skipped
+  // or unavailable" — `lint.ok`/`testsOk` are both true in the skipped case
+  // by design (this codebase does not fail-closed just because a repo has
+  // no linter or no detected test runner), so a caller checking only `ok`
+  // cannot tell the difference. `lint.skipped` is only ever true when a
+  // linter WAS configured but its binary could not be run (missing config
+  // entirely returns `runner: 'none'` with no `skipped` field at all — that
+  // is a genuine N/A, nothing was required, not a degradation). `verifiedFull`
+  // is the honest label: true only when nothing that WAS required was
+  // skipped. A caller must never present `ok: true, verifiedFull: false` as
+  // "fully verified" — `degradedLegs` names exactly what was skipped so a
+  // report can say so plainly instead of a bare pass.
+  const degradedLegs = [];
+  if (lint.skipped) degradedLegs.push(`lint: ${lint.runner} not installed`);
+  if (tests.skipped) degradedLegs.push(`tests: skipped (${tests.reason})`);
+  const verifiedFull = ok && degradedLegs.length === 0;
+
+  const durations = { ...stages, totalMs: Date.now() - t0 };
+  const summary = [
+    `re-scan: ${rescan.ok ? 'PASS' : 'FAIL — ' + rescan.reason}`,
+    `linter:  ${lint.runner === 'none' ? 'skipped (no linter config)'
+              : lint.skipped ? `${lint.runner} not installed`
+              : lint.ok ? `${lint.runner} PASS`
+              : `${lint.runner} FAIL (exit ${lint.exitCode})`}`,
+    // Say which tree the suite actually ran against. `files` is a candidate
+    // patch held in memory; the runner needs real files, so it sees whatever is
+    // on disk. Reporting a bare "PASS" here would let a caller believe the
+    // PATCH passed the tests when the suite may have run on unpatched code.
+    `tests:   ${tests.skipped ? `skipped (${tests.reason})`
+              : tests.timedOut ? 'FAIL (timed out)'
+              : tests.passed ? `PASS${_testedPrePatch ? ' — on the CURRENT on-disk tree, NOT the candidate patch' : ''}`
+              : `FAIL (exit ${tests.exitCode})`}`,
+    honesty ? `honesty: ${honesty.ok ? `PASS (${honesty.tier})` : 'FAIL — ' + honesty.violations.join('; ')}` : null,
+    // Never render `inconclusive` as a pass — say plainly that nothing was proven.
+    pocLeg.status === 'not-requested' ? null
+      : pocLeg.status === 'still-exploitable' ? `poc:     FAIL — the proof-of-concept still demonstrates the vulnerability against the patch`
+      : pocLeg.status === 'no-longer-proven' ? 'poc:     PASS (ran against the patch and no longer demonstrates the vulnerability)'
+      : `poc:     inconclusive — not counted either way (${pocLeg.reason || 'no detail reported'})`,
+    // FR-305: never let a degraded pass read the same as a full one.
+    ok && !verifiedFull ? `NOTE:    PASSED, but NOT fully verified — ${degradedLegs.join('; ')}` : null,
+  ].filter(Boolean).join('\n');
+  // Persist the attempt so the distribution can be reported from real runs.
+  // `testsRan` is the load-bearing field: it is what keeps "verified with no
+  // test suite to run" out of the headline time-to-validated-fix bucket.
+  // A patch that was never written to disk is recorded too, but flagged — its
+  // suite ran against the pre-patch tree, so its timing is real while its
+  // verdict is about a different tree.
+  if (recordMetrics && scanRoot) {
+    (0,_fix_metrics_js__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_6__/* .recordFixAttempt */ .I3)(scanRoot, {
+      at: new Date().toISOString(),
+      stableId: originalFindingStableId || null,
+      ok,
+      verifiedFull,
+      testsRan: !tests.skipped,
+      testsPassed: tests.skipped ? null : tests.passed === true,
+      testedPrePatch: _testedPrePatch,
+      lintRan: !(lint.skipped || lint.runner === 'none'),
+      honestyGated: honesty != null,
+      pocStatus: pocLeg.status,
+      files: Object.keys(files || {}).length,
+      stages,
+      totalMs: durations.totalMs,
+    });
+  }
+
+  return { ok, verifiedFull, degradedLegs, rescan, lint, tests, testedPrePatch: _testedPrePatch, honesty, poc: pocLeg, durations, summary };
+}
+
+__webpack_async_result__();
+} catch(e) { __webpack_async_result__(e); } });
+
+/***/ }),
+
+/***/ 35136:
+/***/ ((__unused_webpack___webpack_module__, __webpack_exports__, __webpack_require__) => {
+
+/* harmony export */ __webpack_require__.d(__webpack_exports__, {
+/* harmony export */   I: () => (/* binding */ runProjectTests)
+/* harmony export */ });
+/* unused harmony export detectTestCommand */
+/* harmony import */ var node_child_process__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__ = __webpack_require__(31421);
+/* harmony import */ var node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__ = __webpack_require__(73024);
+/* harmony import */ var node_path__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__ = __webpack_require__(76760);
+// R5 (partial, roadmap) — the project's own test suite as a verification
+// stage for `verifyFix()` (see `fix-verify.js`). Closes the gap where a
+// "verified" fix only proved a finding's stableId stopped firing — a patch
+// that deletes the feature entirely would satisfy that just as well as a
+// real fix. Running the project's own tests is the cheapest available check
+// that the application still works.
+//
+// Execution-safety note: this spawns the TARGET PROJECT's own test command
+// in the target project's own directory. That is deliberately NOT routed
+// through the R1 confinement sandbox (`../sandbox/`). That sandbox exists to
+// contain untrusted proof-of-concept exploit code the scanner itself
+// synthesizes — code nobody has vetted, being run for the first time. A
+// project's pre-existing test suite is the opposite case: it is the
+// project's own trusted source, already sitting on disk, and running it is
+// exactly what a human developer does by hand before trusting a fix.
+// Wrapping "npm test" / "pytest" / "go test" in the PoC sandbox's
+// syscall/network/filesystem restrictions would break the large majority of
+// real test suites (they bind local ports, spawn child processes, write temp
+// fixtures, etc.) for no corresponding security benefit.
+
+
+
+
+
+const DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS = 300_000;
+const NPM_PLACEHOLDER = /Error: no test specified/i;
+
+function _exists(scanRoot, rel) {
+  try { return node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__.existsSync(node_path__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__.join(scanRoot, rel)); } catch { return false; }
+}
+
+function _isDir(scanRoot, rel) {
+  try { return node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__.statSync(node_path__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__.join(scanRoot, rel)).isDirectory(); } catch { return false; }
+}
+
+function _binaryAvailable(cmd) {
+  try {
+    const r = (0,node_child_process__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__.spawnSync)(cmd, ['--version'], { timeout: 5_000, stdio: 'ignore' });
+    return !(r.error && r.error.code === 'ENOENT');
+  } catch {
+    return false;
+  }
+}
+
+// Detect the project's test command. Read-only — never spawns the actual
+// test run, only (optionally) a cheap `--version` probe to confirm a tool
+// like `pytest` is actually installed before committing to it. Returns
+// `null` when nothing detectable is found — most scanned repos will hit
+// this path, and that must not be treated as a failure by callers.
+function detectTestCommand(scanRoot) {
+  if (!scanRoot) return null;
+
+  // JS/TS — package.json with a real (non-placeholder) `scripts.test`.
+  let pkg = null;
+  try { pkg = JSON.parse(node_fs__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_1__.readFileSync(node_path__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2__.join(scanRoot, 'package.json'), 'utf8')); } catch { pkg = null; }
+  const testScript = pkg && pkg.scripts && pkg.scripts.test;
+  if (testScript && !NPM_PLACEHOLDER.test(String(testScript))) {
+    if (_exists(scanRoot, 'pnpm-lock.yaml')) return { cmd: 'pnpm', args: ['test'], kind: 'pnpm' };
+    if (_exists(scanRoot, 'yarn.lock')) return { cmd: 'yarn', args: ['test'], kind: 'yarn' };
+    if (_exists(scanRoot, 'bun.lockb') || _exists(scanRoot, 'bun.lock')) return { cmd: 'bun', args: ['test'], kind: 'bun' };
+    return { cmd: 'npm', args: ['test', '--silent'], kind: 'npm' };
+  }
+
+  // Python — pytest.ini / pyproject.toml / tox.ini / a tests/ dir, and the
+  // `pytest` binary actually available. If pytest isn't installed we do NOT
+  // report a python test command — falling through lets a later language
+  // marker (e.g. go.mod in a polyglot repo) still be detected.
+  const pyMarker = _exists(scanRoot, 'pytest.ini') || _exists(scanRoot, 'pyproject.toml') ||
+    _exists(scanRoot, 'tox.ini') || _isDir(scanRoot, 'tests');
+  if (pyMarker && _binaryAvailable('pytest')) {
+    return { cmd: 'pytest', args: ['-q'], kind: 'pytest' };
+  }
+
+  // Go
+  if (_exists(scanRoot, 'go.mod')) {
+    return { cmd: 'go', args: ['test', './...'], kind: 'go' };
+  }
+
+  return null;
+}
+
+// Run the detected test command with a walltime budget. Always returns a
+// result object — never throws. Distinguishes four outcomes:
+//   - no detectable/runnable command  -> status: 'skipped'  (does NOT fail)
+//   - ran and exited 0                -> status: 'passed'
+//   - ran and exited non-zero         -> status: 'failed'
+//   - ran past the timeout budget     -> status: 'failed', timedOut: true
+function runProjectTests(scanRoot, { timeoutMs = DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_MS } = {}) {
+  const startedAt = Date.now();
+  const command = detectTestCommand(scanRoot);
+  if (!command) {
+    return {
+      status: 'skipped', passed: null, skipped: true,
+      reason: 'no-test-command-detected', exitCode: null, timedOut: false,
+      durationMs: Date.now() - startedAt,
+    };
+  }
+
+  let r;
+  try {
+    r = (0,node_child_process__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0__.spawnSync)(command.cmd, command.args, {
+      cwd: scanRoot,
+      encoding: 'utf8',
+      timeout: timeoutMs,
+      env: { ...process.env, CI: '1' },
+    });
+  } catch (e) {
+    // The spawn call itself threw (rare — e.g. cwd vanished). Treat as
+    // "could not run", not "ran and failed".
+    return {
+      status: 'skipped', passed: null, skipped: true,
+      reason: `spawn-error: ${e.message}`, exitCode: null, timedOut: false,
+      durationMs: Date.now() - startedAt,
+    };
+  }
+  const durationMs = Date.now() - startedAt;
+
+  if (r.error && r.error.code === 'ENOENT') {
+    // The detected tool isn't actually installed on this machine. Not a
+    // test failure — the suite never ran.
+    return {
+      status: 'skipped', passed: null, skipped: true,
+      reason: `${command.kind}-not-installed`, exitCode: null, timedOut: false, durationMs,
+    };
+  }
+
+  if (r.status === null) {
+    // spawnSync sets status:null both on timeout-kill and on being killed by
+    // another signal; either way the run did not complete, which is a
+    // verification failure, never a skip — we asked for a result and the
+    // process was terminated before producing one.
+    return {
+      status: 'failed', passed: false, skipped: false,
+      reason: 'timed-out', exitCode: null, timedOut: true, durationMs,
+    };
+  }
+
+  return {
+    status: r.status === 0 ? 'passed' : 'failed',
+    passed: r.status === 0,
+    skipped: false,
+    reason: r.status === 0 ? null : 'test-failures',
+    exitCode: r.status,
+    timedOut: false,
+    durationMs,
+  };
+}
+
+
+/***/ })
+
+};