@clear-capabilities/agentic-security-scanner 0.133.0 → 0.136.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (111) hide show
  1. package/CHANGELOG.md +299 -0
  2. package/bin/agentic-security-audit.js +2 -1
  3. package/bin/agentic-security-consistency.js +2 -1
  4. package/bin/agentic-security.js +348 -40
  5. package/dist/113.index.js +6 -6
  6. package/dist/117.index.js +3 -1
  7. package/dist/178.index.js +1 -1
  8. package/dist/220.index.js +5 -3
  9. package/dist/238.index.js +4 -4
  10. package/dist/317.index.js +270 -0
  11. package/dist/384.index.js +1 -1
  12. package/dist/435.index.js +13 -7
  13. package/dist/499.index.js +86 -0
  14. package/dist/513.index.js +7 -3
  15. package/dist/526.index.js +6 -6
  16. package/dist/609.index.js +741 -0
  17. package/dist/637.index.js +1 -1
  18. package/dist/675.index.js +7 -5
  19. package/dist/839.index.js +4 -3
  20. package/dist/905.index.js +1173 -0
  21. package/dist/agentic-security.mjs +56 -56
  22. package/dist/agentic-security.mjs.sha256 +1 -1
  23. package/dist/compliance-frameworks/ccpa.json +32 -0
  24. package/dist/compliance-frameworks/eu-ai-act.json +51 -0
  25. package/dist/compliance-frameworks/gdpr.json +45 -0
  26. package/dist/compliance-frameworks/hipaa-security-rule.json +56 -0
  27. package/dist/compliance-frameworks/nist-ai-600-1.json +51 -0
  28. package/dist/compliance-frameworks/nist-csf-2.json +73 -0
  29. package/dist/compliance-frameworks/nist-privacy-1-1.json +846 -0
  30. package/dist/compliance-frameworks/owasp-asvs-5.json +79 -0
  31. package/dist/compliance-frameworks/owasp-llm-top-10.json +69 -0
  32. package/package.json +14 -6
  33. package/src/badge.js +2 -1
  34. package/src/dataflow/cross-service-taint.js +2 -1
  35. package/src/dataflow/ifds-precise.js +6 -4
  36. package/src/dataflow/incremental.js +7 -5
  37. package/src/discovery/CLAUDE.md +48 -0
  38. package/src/discovery/confirm.js +47 -0
  39. package/src/discovery/disprove.js +79 -0
  40. package/src/discovery/hunter.js +116 -0
  41. package/src/discovery/index.js +331 -0
  42. package/src/discovery/judge.js +97 -0
  43. package/src/discovery/lenses.js +69 -0
  44. package/src/discovery/llm-invoke.js +120 -0
  45. package/src/discovery/memory.js +163 -0
  46. package/src/discovery/partition.js +92 -0
  47. package/src/engine.js +163 -7
  48. package/src/integrations/tickets.js +7 -6
  49. package/src/ir/ir-stats.js +1 -1
  50. package/src/ir/parser-cpp.js +1 -1
  51. package/src/leaderboard.js +3 -2
  52. package/src/llm-validator/consistency.js +6 -2
  53. package/src/llm-validator/index.js +30 -41
  54. package/src/llm-validator/providers.js +227 -0
  55. package/src/mcp/audit.js +2 -1
  56. package/src/mcp/tools.js +4 -3
  57. package/src/posture/CLAUDE.md +102 -1
  58. package/src/posture/accuracy-scorecard.js +59 -1
  59. package/src/posture/agents-memory.js +5 -3
  60. package/src/posture/auditor-walkthrough.js +9 -7
  61. package/src/posture/auth-posture-import.js +5 -4
  62. package/src/posture/autopilot.js +225 -0
  63. package/src/posture/comparison.js +181 -0
  64. package/src/posture/compliance-frameworks/nist-privacy-1-1.json +846 -0
  65. package/src/posture/compliance-policy.js +7 -9
  66. package/src/posture/custom-rules.js +7 -5
  67. package/src/posture/cve-alert-daemon.js +6 -5
  68. package/src/posture/dep-add-guard.js +2 -1
  69. package/src/posture/deterministic.js +3 -2
  70. package/src/posture/evidence-bundle.js +246 -0
  71. package/src/posture/execution-proof.js +25 -1
  72. package/src/posture/exploitability-probability.js +2 -1
  73. package/src/posture/feature-flags.js +3 -2
  74. package/src/posture/findings-memory.js +3 -3
  75. package/src/posture/fix-history.js +5 -2
  76. package/src/posture/fix-metrics.js +5 -5
  77. package/src/posture/fix-plan.js +2 -1
  78. package/src/posture/fleet.js +0 -0
  79. package/src/posture/grader-calibration.js +3 -4
  80. package/src/posture/intent-context.js +2 -1
  81. package/src/posture/learning.js +4 -3
  82. package/src/posture/license-attributions.js +5 -7
  83. package/src/posture/license-graph.js +2 -1
  84. package/src/posture/license-policy.js +2 -1
  85. package/src/posture/logic-claims.js +266 -0
  86. package/src/posture/model-rescan.js +4 -3
  87. package/src/posture/network-policy-import.js +3 -2
  88. package/src/posture/poc-inprocess.js +404 -2
  89. package/src/posture/pqc-migration-plan.js +7 -5
  90. package/src/posture/pr-augment.js +8 -5
  91. package/src/posture/privacy-framework.js +262 -0
  92. package/src/posture/proof-artifact.js +101 -0
  93. package/src/posture/prove-findings.js +28 -4
  94. package/src/posture/risk-dollars.js +2 -2
  95. package/src/posture/router.js +5 -4
  96. package/src/posture/ruleset-version.js +2 -2
  97. package/src/posture/runtime-correlation.js +2 -1
  98. package/src/posture/sbom-diff.js +12 -3
  99. package/src/posture/sca-policy.js +7 -4
  100. package/src/posture/scan-checkpoint.js +15 -0
  101. package/src/posture/state-dir.js +34 -0
  102. package/src/posture/telemetry-ingest.js +4 -3
  103. package/src/posture/threat-model-auto.js +4 -1
  104. package/src/posture/threat-model-grounding.js +11 -1
  105. package/src/posture/time-to-fix.js +3 -2
  106. package/src/posture/triage-memory.js +3 -2
  107. package/src/posture/waf-ingest.js +6 -5
  108. package/src/posture/watch-mode.js +4 -3
  109. package/src/report/index.js +9 -0
  110. package/src/sast/code-injection-multilang.js +29 -0
  111. package/src/sca/dep-confusion.js +2 -1
@@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
1
+ // NIST Privacy Framework 1.1 — assessment + remediation planning.
2
+ //
3
+ // The bundled control set (`compliance-frameworks/nist-privacy-1-1.json`) is
4
+ // rendered by `auditor-walkthrough.js` like every other framework. This module
5
+ // adds the half a walkthrough cannot give you: a gap becomes a FINDING carrying
6
+ // a concrete remediation, so it flows through the same triage and `/fix` path
7
+ // as any other finding rather than sitting in a narrative nobody actions.
8
+ //
9
+ // THE INTEGRITY RULE THIS MODULE EXISTS TO ENFORCE
10
+ // -----------------------------------------------
11
+ // NIST ships a `Code Testable?` rating per control — yes / partial / no. On the
12
+ // 104 controls: 23 yes, 33 partial, **48 no**.
13
+ //
14
+ // That rating says whether a control COULD be assessed from source code. It does
15
+ // NOT say this engine assesses it. Conflating the two is how a compliance tool
16
+ // starts reporting governance controls — "the organization's privacy values are
17
+ // communicated" — as PASSED because no scanner rule fired against them. Silence
18
+ // is not evidence, and a clean report over 48 controls nobody measured is worse
19
+ // than no report: it is a false assurance that someone will hand to an auditor.
20
+ //
21
+ // So every control lands in exactly one of four buckets, and the bucket is
22
+ // always stated:
23
+ //
24
+ // satisfied mapped to a real engine signal, and that signal is clean
25
+ // gap mapped to a real engine signal, and that signal is dirty
26
+ // → this is the only bucket that produces a finding
27
+ // engine-gap NIST rates it code-testable, but this engine has no signal
28
+ // → disclosed BY NAME, never counted as satisfied
29
+ // manual NIST rates it not code-testable (governance, policy, process)
30
+ // → out of scope for any scanner, stated as such
31
+ //
32
+ // `engine-gap` is the bucket that keeps this honest. It is the difference
33
+ // between "we checked and it is fine" and "nobody checked", and it is reported
34
+ // with the same prominence as a failure because to a reader relying on the
35
+ // output they are the same thing.
36
+
37
+ import { loadFramework, evaluateFramework } from './auditor-walkthrough.js';
38
+ import { statePath, safeWriteState } from './state-dir.js';
39
+
40
+ export const PRIVACY_FRAMEWORK_ID = 'nist-privacy-1-1';
41
+
42
+ /** Bucket names, in report order (worst first). */
43
+ export const BUCKETS = Object.freeze(['gap', 'engine-gap', 'manual', 'satisfied']);
44
+
45
+ /**
46
+ * Remediation per control family. Deliberately ACTIONABLE — a command or a
47
+ * concrete artifact — rather than a restatement of the control text, which is
48
+ * what a compliance report usually offers and what makes them ignorable.
49
+ *
50
+ * Keyed by the control-id prefix so a new control in an existing category
51
+ * inherits sensible guidance instead of silently getting none.
52
+ */
53
+ const REMEDIATION = [
54
+ [/^PR\.DS-P1$/, 'Encrypt data at rest with an AEAD cipher. Replace ECB mode and static IVs; run `/fix --family crypto-weak-cipher` to apply the deterministic swaps.'],
55
+ [/^PR\.DS-P2$/, 'Enforce TLS 1.2+ and stop disabling certificate verification. `/fix --family crypto-tls-no-verify` patches the verify-off call sites.'],
56
+ [/^PR\.AA-P1$/, 'Remove hardcoded credentials and add authentication to unauthenticated routes. `/fix --rotate-secret` handles the secrets; auth gaps need a route-level decision.'],
57
+ [/^PR\.AA-P4$/, 'Sign and verify identity assertions with a modern algorithm — no `none` alg, no weak-hash HMAC.'],
58
+ [/^PR\.AA-05$/, 'Add object-level authorization on endpoints that read or mutate personal data. Review the IDOR and authz findings individually; these are not safely auto-patchable.'],
59
+ [/^PR\.PS-P1$/, 'Tighten IaC: drop privileged pod security contexts and over-permissive IAM policies.'],
60
+ [/^PR\.PS-P2$/, 'Upgrade dependencies carrying known advisories. `/fix --sca` proposes the version bumps.'],
61
+ [/^PR\.PS-P4$/, 'Resolve dependency-confusion exposure by pinning internal scopes to your private registry.'],
62
+ [/^PR\.IR-P1$/, 'Restrict network and cluster access — no cluster-admin bindings, no wildcard IAM.'],
63
+ [/^PR\.DS-P8$/, 'Record an SBOM snapshot per release so dependency substitution is detectable.'],
64
+ [/^CT\.DP-P/, 'Reduce what is observable: minimise PII reaching logs, responses, and third parties; de-identify where the data action does not need identity.'],
65
+ [/^CT\.DM-P6$/, 'Transmit over TLS with a standard, current cipher suite.'],
66
+ [/^CT\.DM-P9$/, 'Retain scan history and the MCP audit log so data-processing activity is reviewable.'],
67
+ [/^CT\.DM-P10$/, 'Keep fix history so the technical measures you applied are demonstrably tested, not asserted.'],
68
+ [/^CT\.PO-P/, 'Declare the policy in `.agentic-security/compliance.policy.yml` so it is verified on every scan rather than remembered.'],
69
+ [/^CM\.AW-P4$/, 'Preserve the audit log — it is the record of disclosure this control asks for.'],
70
+ [/^CM\.AW-P6$/, 'Keep SBOM snapshots and signed scan state so provenance and lineage survive review.'],
71
+ [/^ID\.IM-P/, 'Produce the inventory artifacts: run a scan so the SBOM, threat model, and PII field map exist and are current.'],
72
+ [/^ID\.RA-P3$/, 'Triage the PII-exposure findings — each is a problematic data action this control asks you to identify.'],
73
+ [/^ID\.BE-P3$/, 'Generate the threat model so priority systems and their requirements are recorded.'],
74
+ [/^GV\.PO-P2$/, 'Commit a compliance policy file so privacy expectations are enforced in CI, not just documented.'],
75
+ ];
76
+
77
+ /** The remediation for a control, or null when none is defined. */
78
+ export function remediationFor(controlId) {
79
+ for (const [re, text] of REMEDIATION) if (re.test(controlId)) return text;
80
+ return null;
81
+ }
82
+
83
+ /**
84
+ * Bucket one evaluated control.
85
+ *
86
+ * `evaluateFramework` returns 'present' | 'partial' | 'manual'. That vocabulary
87
+ * cannot distinguish "no mapping because it is a governance control" from "no
88
+ * mapping because we never built the check" — which is exactly the distinction
89
+ * that decides whether a reader should worry. `codeTestable` supplies it.
90
+ */
91
+ export function bucketOf(result, { assessable = true } = {}) {
92
+ const c = result.control || {};
93
+ const mapped = Array.isArray(c.mapsTo) && c.mapsTo.length > 0;
94
+ if (mapped) {
95
+ // VACUOUS SATISFACTION GUARD. `evaluateFramework` clears a `family:`
96
+ // mapping when no findings of that family are open — which is also true of
97
+ // a scan that examined nothing at all. Without this, pointing the tool at
98
+ // an empty directory reports privacy controls as SATISFIED, on the strength
99
+ // of having looked at zero files. That is the same false assurance the
100
+ // manual bucket exists to prevent, arriving by a different route, and it
101
+ // was caught by this module's own test rather than in review.
102
+ if (!assessable) return 'engine-gap';
103
+ return result.status === 'present' ? 'satisfied' : 'gap';
104
+ }
105
+ return String(c.codeTestable || 'no').toLowerCase() === 'no' ? 'manual' : 'engine-gap';
106
+ }
107
+
108
+ /** Severity for a gap. Privacy controls are graded by what the gap exposes. */
109
+ function severityFor(controlId) {
110
+ if (/^PR\.(DS|AA)/.test(controlId)) return 'high'; // encryption, identity, access
111
+ if (/^CT\.DP/.test(controlId)) return 'medium'; // data minimisation
112
+ return 'low';
113
+ }
114
+
115
+ /**
116
+ * Assess a scan against NIST Privacy Framework 1.1.
117
+ *
118
+ * Returns `{ frameworkId, controls[], summary, findings[] }`. Never throws:
119
+ * posture modules degrade to a null result rather than failing a scan.
120
+ */
121
+ export function assessPrivacyFramework(scanRoot, scan, opts = {}) {
122
+ const fw = loadFramework(scanRoot, PRIVACY_FRAMEWORK_ID);
123
+ if (!fw) return null;
124
+
125
+ let evaluation;
126
+ try { evaluation = evaluateFramework(scanRoot, fw, scan || {}); } catch { return null; }
127
+
128
+ // Did the scan actually examine anything? A clean signal from a run that read
129
+ // no files is not evidence — see the guard in bucketOf.
130
+ const filesScanned = Number(scan && (scan.filesScanned ?? scan._scanMeta?.filesScanned)) || 0;
131
+ const assessable = filesScanned > 0
132
+ || (Array.isArray(scan?.findings) && scan.findings.length > 0)
133
+ || (Array.isArray(scan?.components) && scan.components.length > 0);
134
+
135
+ const controls = [];
136
+ const findings = [];
137
+ const summary = { gap: 0, 'engine-gap': 0, manual: 0, satisfied: 0, total: 0 };
138
+
139
+ for (const r of evaluation) {
140
+ const c = r.control || {};
141
+ const bucket = bucketOf(r, { assessable });
142
+ summary[bucket] += 1;
143
+ summary.total += 1;
144
+
145
+ const row = {
146
+ id: c.id,
147
+ function: c.function || null,
148
+ category: c.category || null,
149
+ summary: c.summary || '',
150
+ codeTestable: c.codeTestable || 'no',
151
+ bucket,
152
+ observations: r.observations || [],
153
+ };
154
+ if (bucket === 'engine-gap') {
155
+ // Named, not counted as a pass. See the header.
156
+ row.disclosure = (Array.isArray(c.mapsTo) && c.mapsTo.length && !assessable)
157
+ ? 'This control is mapped, but the scan examined no files — a clean signal from a run that read nothing is not evidence. NOT assessed.'
158
+ : `NIST rates this control code-testable (${row.codeTestable}), but this engine has no signal for it. It was NOT assessed.`;
159
+ }
160
+ if (bucket === 'manual') {
161
+ row.disclosure = 'NIST rates this control not code-testable — it is a governance, policy, or process control and is outside any scanner\'s reach.';
162
+ }
163
+ controls.push(row);
164
+
165
+ if (bucket !== 'gap') continue;
166
+ const remediation = remediationFor(c.id)
167
+ || 'Review the observations for this control and close the underlying findings.';
168
+ findings.push({
169
+ id: `privacy-framework:${c.id}`,
170
+ severity: severityFor(c.id),
171
+ // A compliance gap is a property of the project, not of one line. The
172
+ // framework file is cited so the finding still has a real, openable
173
+ // location rather than a fabricated one.
174
+ file: '.agentic-security/compliance/nist-privacy-1-1',
175
+ line: 0,
176
+ vuln: `NIST Privacy Framework ${c.id} not satisfied — ${c.summary}`,
177
+ cwe: 'CWE-359',
178
+ description: [
179
+ `Control ${c.id} (${c.category || c.function || 'privacy'}) is mapped to engine signals that are currently failing.`,
180
+ ...(r.observations || []),
181
+ ].join(' '),
182
+ remediation,
183
+ parser: 'COMPLIANCE',
184
+ family: 'privacy-compliance',
185
+ complianceControl: { framework: PRIVACY_FRAMEWORK_ID, id: c.id, codeTestable: c.codeTestable || 'no' },
186
+ });
187
+ }
188
+
189
+ return {
190
+ frameworkId: PRIVACY_FRAMEWORK_ID,
191
+ frameworkName: fw.name,
192
+ controls,
193
+ summary,
194
+ findings,
195
+ // Carried in the result so a consumer cannot present the numbers without
196
+ // it. `satisfied` is a share of the ASSESSED controls, never of all 104.
197
+ assessable,
198
+ interpretation:
199
+ (!assessable ? 'The scan examined no files, so NO control was assessed. ' : '') +
200
+ `${summary.satisfied} of ${summary.satisfied + summary.gap} assessed controls satisfied. ` +
201
+ `${summary['engine-gap']} controls NIST rates code-testable were NOT assessed by this engine, and ` +
202
+ `${summary.manual} are governance controls outside any scanner's reach. ` +
203
+ 'Neither group is evidence of compliance.',
204
+ ...(opts.includeFindings === false ? { findings: [] } : {}),
205
+ };
206
+ }
207
+
208
+ /**
209
+ * Render the assessment as Markdown, worst bucket first.
210
+ *
211
+ * Order is deliberate: gaps, then the controls nobody assessed, then governance,
212
+ * then satisfied. A report that opens with what passed invites the reader to
213
+ * stop there, which is precisely the wrong reading of a document where most
214
+ * controls carry no engine evidence at all.
215
+ */
216
+ function renderPrivacyMarkdown(result) {
217
+ if (!result) return '';
218
+ const L = [];
219
+ L.push(`# ${result.frameworkName} — assessment`);
220
+ L.push('');
221
+ L.push(result.interpretation);
222
+ L.push('');
223
+ L.push('| Bucket | Controls | Meaning |');
224
+ L.push('| --- | --- | --- |');
225
+ L.push(`| Gap | ${result.summary.gap} | Mapped to an engine signal, and that signal is failing |`);
226
+ L.push(`| Not assessed | ${result.summary['engine-gap']} | Code-testable, but this engine has no signal — **not** a pass |`);
227
+ L.push(`| Manual | ${result.summary.manual} | Governance/policy control, outside any scanner's reach |`);
228
+ L.push(`| Satisfied | ${result.summary.satisfied} | Mapped, and the signal is clean |`);
229
+ L.push('');
230
+ L.push('> A control in *Not assessed* or *Manual* is not evidence of compliance.');
231
+ L.push('> This document organizes scanner evidence; it does not certify anything.');
232
+ L.push('> A licensed assessor is responsible for the attestation.');
233
+ L.push('');
234
+ for (const bucket of BUCKETS) {
235
+ const rows = result.controls.filter(c => c.bucket === bucket);
236
+ if (!rows.length) continue;
237
+ L.push(`## ${bucket} (${rows.length})`);
238
+ L.push('');
239
+ for (const c of rows) {
240
+ L.push(`### ${c.id} — ${c.summary}`);
241
+ L.push(`- NIST code-testable: **${c.codeTestable}**`);
242
+ if (c.disclosure) L.push(`- ${c.disclosure}`);
243
+ for (const o of c.observations || []) L.push(`- ${o}`);
244
+ const rem = bucket === 'gap' ? remediationFor(c.id) : null;
245
+ if (rem) L.push(`- **Remediation:** ${rem}`);
246
+ L.push('');
247
+ }
248
+ }
249
+ return L.join('\n');
250
+ }
251
+
252
+ /**
253
+ * Persist the assessment. Through the seam, so a read-only scan writes nothing
254
+ * while still RETURNING the assessment — the switch changes what is written,
255
+ * never what is reported.
256
+ */
257
+ export function persistPrivacyFramework(scanRoot, result) {
258
+ if (!result) return null;
259
+ safeWriteState(statePath(scanRoot, 'privacy-framework.json'), JSON.stringify(result, null, 2));
260
+ safeWriteState(statePath(scanRoot, 'privacy-framework.md'), renderPrivacyMarkdown(result));
261
+ return result;
262
+ }
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
1
+ // Proof-artifact provenance (PRD Epic 1.4 + 7.4).
2
+ //
3
+ // An `execution-proven` finding is only worth more than a pattern match if a
4
+ // reader can tell WHAT was proven and check that the claim was not edited after
5
+ // the fact. This module turns the evidence a proof run produced into two things
6
+ // a report can carry:
7
+ //
8
+ // 1. `proofLevel` — the PRD's public vocabulary, mapped from the engine's
9
+ // internal `proofTier`. The engine's names are about analysis provenance;
10
+ // the PRD's are about what a reader may conclude. They are deliberately
11
+ // NOT the same strings, and mapping in one place stops the two vocabularies
12
+ // drifting into each other across reporters.
13
+ //
14
+ // 2. `proofArtifactSha256` — a digest over the evidence that actually
15
+ // justified the tier: the PoC that ran, the effect observed, the backend it
16
+ // ran on, and the tier claimed. A fix PR can then reference the digest, and
17
+ // anyone re-running the proof can check they are looking at the same
18
+ // artifact rather than a later, friendlier one.
19
+ //
20
+ // WHAT THE DIGEST IS AND IS NOT. It is tamper-EVIDENCE over the proof record,
21
+ // not proof the exploit is real — the execution is what does that. It is also
22
+ // not a signature: it commits to content, and anyone can recompute it. Signing
23
+ // belongs with `integrity.js`, which already has a key and a provenance story;
24
+ // duplicating that here would be a second crypto path for no gain.
25
+ //
26
+ // Timestamps are deliberately excluded. Two runs that proved the same thing the
27
+ // same way should produce the same digest, or the field cannot be used to say
28
+ // "this is the artifact the PR was reviewed against".
29
+
30
+ import crypto from 'node:crypto';
31
+
32
+ // Engine tier -> PRD proof level. Every tier maps; an unknown tier maps to the
33
+ // weakest level rather than being dropped, because a missing level would read
34
+ // as "not applicable" instead of "we do not know".
35
+ const TIER_TO_LEVEL = Object.freeze({
36
+ 'execution-proven': 'PROVEN',
37
+ 'proof-failed': 'PROBABLE_FP',
38
+ 'taint-proven': 'REACHABLE',
39
+ 'unproven': 'PATTERN',
40
+ });
41
+
42
+ export const PROOF_LEVELS = Object.freeze(['PROVEN', 'PROBABLE_FP', 'REACHABLE', 'PATTERN']);
43
+
44
+ /**
45
+ * The PRD-facing proof level for a finding.
46
+ *
47
+ * Returns null when the finding carries no tier at all — a scan that never ran
48
+ * the proof stage must not have every finding labelled `PATTERN`, which would
49
+ * assert that each was considered and found unprovable.
50
+ */
51
+ export function proofLevelOf(finding) {
52
+ const tier = finding?.proofTier;
53
+ if (!tier) return null;
54
+ return TIER_TO_LEVEL[tier] || 'PATTERN';
55
+ }
56
+
57
+ /**
58
+ * Digest over the evidence that justified the tier. Null when there is no
59
+ * evidence to commit to — an absent hash is honest; a hash over nothing is not.
60
+ */
61
+ export function proofArtifactDigest(finding) {
62
+ const ev = finding?.proofEvidence;
63
+ if (!ev || !finding?.proofTier) return null;
64
+ // Only fields that constitute the CLAIM. `at` (a timestamp) and `exitCode`
65
+ // are excluded: they vary between identical proofs and would make the digest
66
+ // useless for "same artifact?" comparisons.
67
+ const material = JSON.stringify({
68
+ tier: finding.proofTier,
69
+ ran: ev.ran === true,
70
+ backend: ev.backend ?? null,
71
+ observed: ev.observed ?? null,
72
+ reason: ev.reason ?? null,
73
+ marker: finding.poc?.marker ?? null,
74
+ poc: finding.poc?.code ?? null,
75
+ });
76
+ return crypto.createHash('sha256').update(material).digest('hex');
77
+ }
78
+
79
+ /**
80
+ * The reportable proof block, or null when the finding has no proof standing.
81
+ * One shape, so every reporter says the same thing the same way.
82
+ */
83
+ export function proofBlock(finding) {
84
+ const level = proofLevelOf(finding);
85
+ if (!level) return null;
86
+ const ev = finding?.proofEvidence || {};
87
+ return {
88
+ proofLevel: level,
89
+ proofTier: finding.proofTier,
90
+ proofRan: ev.ran === true,
91
+ ...(ev.backend ? { proofBackend: ev.backend } : {}),
92
+ ...(ev.observed ? { proofObserved: ev.observed } : {}),
93
+ // Carried on the weaker levels too: "the PoC ran and nothing happened" is a
94
+ // different statement from "no PoC was attempted", and the reason is what
95
+ // distinguishes them.
96
+ ...(ev.reason ? { proofReason: ev.reason } : {}),
97
+ ...(proofArtifactDigest(finding) ? { proofArtifactSha256: proofArtifactDigest(finding) } : {}),
98
+ };
99
+ }
100
+
101
+ export const _internals = { TIER_TO_LEVEL };
@@ -42,13 +42,35 @@
42
42
  // enable this on untrusted code without accepting that.
43
43
 
44
44
  import { synthesizeInProcessPoc } from './poc-inprocess.js';
45
- import { proveFinding } from './execution-proof.js';
45
+ import { proveFinding, DEFAULT_PROOF_TIMEOUT_MS } from './execution-proof.js';
46
46
  import { sandboxAvailable } from '../sandbox/index.js';
47
47
 
48
48
  const DEFAULT_MAX = 25;
49
49
  // Aggregate wall-clock across all candidates in one scan.
50
50
  const DEFAULT_TOTAL_BUDGET_MS = 120000;
51
51
 
52
+ /**
53
+ * The file set materialised into the sandbox root for one PoC.
54
+ *
55
+ * `requires` names the vulnerable source (the PoC imports it). `extraFiles`
56
+ * carries support files a template needs that are NOT that source — the SQL
57
+ * class ships a recording driver stub as `node_modules/<driver>/index.js`.
58
+ *
59
+ * `requires` WINS on a collision. Otherwise a template could name the
60
+ * vulnerable file in `extraFiles` and replace the very code the PoC is
61
+ * supposed to exploit with content of its own choosing, and the run would
62
+ * prove a fact about the template.
63
+ */
64
+ export function mergePocFiles(poc, content) {
65
+ const files = {};
66
+ for (const rel of poc?.requires || []) files[rel] = content;
67
+ for (const [rel, c] of Object.entries(poc?.extraFiles || {})) {
68
+ if (rel in files) continue;
69
+ if (typeof c === 'string') files[rel] = c;
70
+ }
71
+ return files;
72
+ }
73
+
52
74
  export function proveEnabled(env = process.env) {
53
75
  return env.AGENTIC_SECURITY_PROVE === '1';
54
76
  }
@@ -60,7 +82,10 @@ export function proveEnabled(env = process.env) {
60
82
  * @returns {object} a summary suitable for surfacing on the scan
61
83
  */
62
84
  export async function annotateExecutionProofs(findings, {
63
- fileContents = null, maxCandidates = DEFAULT_MAX, timeoutMs = 10000,
85
+ // Shares one ceiling with execution-proof.js so the two cannot drift; see the
86
+ // rationale on DEFAULT_PROOF_TIMEOUT_MS there. Bounded overall by
87
+ // maxCandidates, so a generous per-PoC budget cannot run away.
88
+ fileContents = null, maxCandidates = DEFAULT_MAX, timeoutMs = DEFAULT_PROOF_TIMEOUT_MS,
64
89
  totalBudgetMs = DEFAULT_TOTAL_BUDGET_MS, env = process.env, now = Date.now,
65
90
  } = {}) {
66
91
  const summary = {
@@ -112,8 +137,7 @@ export async function annotateExecutionProofs(findings, {
112
137
  summary.attempted++;
113
138
  // The PoC imports the vulnerable file, so it must exist in the sandbox
114
139
  // root alongside it.
115
- const files = {};
116
- for (const rel of c.poc.requires || []) files[rel] = c.content;
140
+ const files = mergePocFiles(c.poc, c.content);
117
141
  let proved;
118
142
  try {
119
143
  proved = await proveFinding({ ...c.finding, poc: c.poc }, { files, timeoutMs });
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@
23
23
  import * as fs from 'node:fs';
24
24
  import * as path from 'node:path';
25
25
 
26
- const STATE = '.agentic-security';
27
26
 
27
+ import { statePath } from './state-dir.js';
28
28
  // Base rates per family (annual probability of at-least-one exploit given
29
29
  // an exposed instance). Rough industry estimates; tune via config.
30
30
  const FAMILY_BASE_PROB = {
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ const REACH_DISCOUNT = {
79
79
  };
80
80
 
81
81
  function _loadConfig(scanRoot) {
82
- const fp = path.join(scanRoot, STATE, 'risk-config.yml');
82
+ const fp = statePath(scanRoot, 'risk-config.yml');
83
83
  if (!fs.existsSync(fp)) return null;
84
84
  try {
85
85
  const body = fs.readFileSync(fp, 'utf8');
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
17
17
  import * as fs from 'node:fs';
18
18
  import * as path from 'node:path';
19
19
 
20
+ import { stateDir, statePath } from './state-dir.js';
20
21
  function readJson(fp) {
21
22
  if (!fs.existsSync(fp)) return null;
22
23
  try { return JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(fp, 'utf8')); } catch { return null; }
@@ -32,7 +33,7 @@ function ageHours(fp) {
32
33
  // history to say anything honest. (premortem: never invent a trend from one
33
34
  // data point.)
34
35
  export function computeScanTrend(scanRoot) {
35
- const hist = readJson(path.join(scanRoot, '.agentic-security', 'scan-history.json'));
36
+ const hist = readJson(statePath(scanRoot, 'scan-history.json'));
36
37
  if (!Array.isArray(hist) || hist.length < 2) return {};
37
38
  const cur = hist[hist.length - 1];
38
39
  const prev = hist[hist.length - 2];
@@ -55,9 +56,9 @@ export function decide(opts) {
55
56
  }
56
57
 
57
58
  function baseDecision({ scanRoot, intent }) {
58
- const stateDir = path.join(scanRoot, '.agentic-security');
59
- const lastScan = readJson(path.join(stateDir, 'last-scan.json'));
60
- const scanAge = ageHours(path.join(stateDir, 'last-scan.json'));
59
+ const stateDirPath = stateDir(scanRoot);
60
+ const lastScan = readJson(path.join(stateDirPath, 'last-scan.json'));
61
+ const scanAge = ageHours(path.join(stateDirPath, 'last-scan.json'));
61
62
 
62
63
  if (!lastScan) {
63
64
  return {
@@ -25,14 +25,14 @@ import * as fs from 'node:fs';
25
25
  import * as path from 'node:path';
26
26
  import { SCANNER_VERSION } from './version.js';
27
27
 
28
+ import { statePath } from './state-dir.js';
28
29
  // Tied to scanner/package.json via posture/version.js — they cannot diverge
29
30
  // (premortem 3R1.3).
30
31
  export const CURRENT_RULESET_VERSION = SCANNER_VERSION;
31
32
 
32
- const FILE = '.agentic-security/ruleset-version.json';
33
33
 
34
34
  export function readPinned(scanRoot) {
35
- const fp = path.join(scanRoot || process.cwd(), FILE);
35
+ const fp = statePath(scanRoot || process.cwd(), 'ruleset-version.json');
36
36
  if (!fs.existsSync(fp)) return null;
37
37
  try { return JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(fp, 'utf8')); }
38
38
  catch { return null; }
@@ -35,12 +35,13 @@ import * as path from 'node:path';
35
35
  import * as readline from 'node:readline';
36
36
  import { createReadStream } from 'node:fs';
37
37
 
38
+ import { statePath } from './state-dir.js';
38
39
  const DEFAULT_TRACE_NAMES = ['runtime-trace.jsonl', 'runtime.jsonl', 'ebpf-trace.jsonl'];
39
40
  const DEFAULT_OBSERVATION_WINDOW_DAYS = 30;
40
41
 
41
42
  export async function loadTrace(scanRoot, opts = {}) {
42
43
  const explicit = opts.tracePath || process.env.AGENTIC_SECURITY_RUNTIME_TRACE_PATH;
43
- const candidates = explicit ? [explicit] : DEFAULT_TRACE_NAMES.map(n => path.join(scanRoot, '.agentic-security', n));
44
+ const candidates = explicit ? [explicit] : DEFAULT_TRACE_NAMES.map(n => statePath(scanRoot, n));
44
45
  let chosen = null;
45
46
  for (const c of candidates) {
46
47
  if (fs.existsSync(c)) { chosen = c; break; }
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
21
21
  // module produces the diff on the next scan.
22
22
 
23
23
  import * as fs from 'node:fs';
24
+ import { statePath, stateWritesEnabled } from './state-dir.js';
24
25
  import * as path from 'node:path';
25
26
  import * as crypto from 'node:crypto';
26
27
  import { execSync } from 'node:child_process';
@@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ import { execSync } from 'node:child_process';
28
29
  const HISTORY_DIR = 'sbom-history';
29
30
 
30
31
  function _historyDir(scanRoot) {
31
- return path.join(scanRoot, '.agentic-security', HISTORY_DIR);
32
+ return statePath(scanRoot, HISTORY_DIR);
32
33
  }
33
34
 
34
35
  function _gitHead(scanRoot) {
@@ -47,7 +48,11 @@ function _snapshotKey(component) {
47
48
  */
48
49
  export function persistSbom(scanRoot, components) {
49
50
  const dir = _historyDir(scanRoot);
50
- try { fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true }); } catch {}
51
+ // The mkdir is inside the switch too. Guarding only the write still left an
52
+ // empty `sbom-history/` in the scanned tree — invisible to `git status`,
53
+ // because git does not track empty directories, and therefore exactly the
54
+ // kind of mutation that passes a clean-status check while still being one.
55
+ if (stateWritesEnabled()) { try { fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true }); } catch {} }
51
56
  const sha = _gitHead(scanRoot) || crypto.createHash('sha256').update(JSON.stringify(components)).digest('hex').slice(0, 12);
52
57
  const snap = {
53
58
  sha, ts: new Date().toISOString(),
@@ -58,7 +63,11 @@ export function persistSbom(scanRoot, components) {
58
63
  sha256: c.sha256 || c.integrity || null,
59
64
  })),
60
65
  };
61
- try { fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, `${sha}.json`), JSON.stringify(snap, null, 2)); } catch {}
66
+ // NON_MUTATING_SCAN_PRD S1 history is a feature, but not at the cost of
67
+ // mutating a tree the caller only asked us to read.
68
+ if (stateWritesEnabled()) {
69
+ try { fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, `${sha}.json`), JSON.stringify(snap, null, 2)); } catch {}
70
+ }
62
71
  return snap;
63
72
  }
64
73
 
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ import * as fs from 'node:fs';
40
40
  import * as path from 'node:path';
41
41
  import * as yaml from '../util/yaml.js';
42
42
 
43
+ import { safeWriteState, stateDir, statePath } from './state-dir.js';
43
44
  const DEFAULT_POLICY = {
44
45
  acceptRisk: [],
45
46
  sla: {},
@@ -49,7 +50,7 @@ const DEFAULT_POLICY = {
49
50
  export function loadScaPolicy(scanRoot) {
50
51
  if (!scanRoot) return null;
51
52
  for (const name of ['sca-policy.yml', 'sca-policy.yaml', 'sca-policy.json']) {
52
- const p = path.join(scanRoot, '.agentic-security', name);
53
+ const p = statePath(scanRoot, name);
53
54
  if (!fs.existsSync(p)) continue;
54
55
  try {
55
56
  const raw = fs.readFileSync(p, 'utf8');
@@ -183,7 +184,7 @@ export function applyScaPolicy(findings, policy, scanTime = new Date()) {
183
184
  // If the policy file doesn't exist, one is created with safe defaults.
184
185
  export function appendAcceptRiskFromTriage(scanRoot, finding, reason) {
185
186
  if (!scanRoot || !finding) return { ok: false, reason: 'missing arguments' };
186
- const dir = path.join(scanRoot, '.agentic-security');
187
+ const dir = stateDir(scanRoot);
187
188
  const fp = path.join(dir, 'sca-policy.yml');
188
189
  let policy = loadScaPolicy(scanRoot);
189
190
  if (policy && policy._error) return { ok: false, reason: policy._error };
@@ -209,7 +210,6 @@ export function appendAcceptRiskFromTriage(scanRoot, finding, reason) {
209
210
  };
210
211
  policy.acceptRisk.push(newEntry);
211
212
 
212
- try { fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true }); } catch {}
213
213
  const serialized = yaml.dump({
214
214
  'accept-risk': policy.acceptRisk.map(e => {
215
215
  const o = {};
@@ -224,7 +224,10 @@ export function appendAcceptRiskFromTriage(scanRoot, finding, reason) {
224
224
  sla: policy.sla && Object.keys(policy.sla).length ? Object.fromEntries(Object.entries(policy.sla).map(([k, v]) => [k, _formatSlaDuration(v)])) : undefined,
225
225
  'major-version-freeze': policy.majorVersionFreeze && Object.keys(policy.majorVersionFreeze).length ? policy.majorVersionFreeze : undefined,
226
226
  });
227
- fs.writeFileSync(fp, serialized);
227
+ // Through the seam. This one is user-initiated (a triage decision), so a
228
+ // refusal is reported rather than swallowed: silently not recording an
229
+ // accepted risk would be worse than failing loudly. (PRD M1)
230
+ if (!safeWriteState(fp, serialized)) return { ok: false, reason: 'state writes disabled or path outside a project root', path: fp };
228
231
  return { ok: true, entry: newEntry, path: fp };
229
232
  }
230
233
 
@@ -43,6 +43,15 @@ import * as path from 'node:path';
43
43
  import * as crypto from 'node:crypto';
44
44
  import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
45
45
 
46
+ import { stateWritesEnabled } from './state-dir.js';
47
+
48
+ // DELIBERATELY NOT routed through statePath(). `resolveProjectRoot()` falls
49
+ // back to walking upward from process.cwd() when the given root does not exist
50
+ // on disk, so `checkpointPath('/some/root')` resolved into the SCANNER'S OWN
51
+ // SOURCE TREE — caught by the test that asserts a checkpoint is never written
52
+ // there. A checkpoint must land in the root it was handed or nowhere; silently
53
+ // relocating it into another directory is the exact failure this line of work
54
+ // exists to prevent. The read-only switch above is still honoured.
46
55
  const STATE_DIR = '.agentic-security';
47
56
  const FILE_NAME = 'scan-checkpoint.jsonl';
48
57
  const FORMAT = 'agentic-security-scan-checkpoint/1';
@@ -191,6 +200,12 @@ function _recover(handle, file, runKey) {
191
200
  */
192
201
  export function openCheckpoint(scanRoot, { runKey } = {}) {
193
202
  if (!scanRoot || !runKey) return _emptyHandle('no-run-key');
203
+ // A read-only scan cannot checkpoint, and must not try. Resume is purely an
204
+ // optimisation — without it the scan recomputes, which is slower and
205
+ // identical — so `--no-state` wins over `AGENTIC_SECURITY_RESUME=1` rather
206
+ // than the two conflicting. The disabled handle no-ops through the rest of
207
+ // the API, so no caller needs a new branch. (PRD M1)
208
+ if (!stateWritesEnabled()) return _emptyHandle('state-writes-disabled');
194
209
  const handle = _emptyHandle(null);
195
210
  try {
196
211
  const dir = path.join(scanRoot, STATE_DIR);