@clawos-dev/clawd 0.2.50-beta.77.3a9364e → 0.2.51-beta.78.2024c11

package/dist/persona-defaults/persona-researcher/.claude/skills/deep-research/reference/continuation.md

@@ -1,167 +0,0 @@
-# Auto-Continuation Protocol
-
-## When to Use
-
-Trigger auto-continuation when report exceeds 18,000 words in single run.
-
----
-
-## Strategy Overview
-
-1. Generate sections 1-10 (stay under 18K words)
-2. Save continuation state file with context preservation
-3. Spawn continuation agent via Task tool
-4. Continuation agent: Reads state -> Generates next batch -> Spawns next if needed
-5. Chain continues recursively until complete
-
----
-
-## Continuation State File
-
-**Location:** `~/.claude/research_output/continuation_state_[report_id].json`
-
-```json
-{
-  "version": "3.0.0",
-  "report_id": "[unique_id]",
-  "file_path": "[absolute_path_to_report.md]",
-  "mode": "[quick|standard|deep|ultradeep]",
-
-  "progress": {
-    "sections_completed": ["list of section IDs"],
-    "total_planned_sections": 15,
-    "word_count_so_far": 12000,
-    "continuation_count": 1
-  },
-
-  "artifacts": {
-    "sources_path": "[folder]/sources.jsonl",
-    "evidence_path": "[folder]/evidence.jsonl",
-    "claims_path": "[folder]/claims.jsonl",
-    "run_manifest_path": "[folder]/run_manifest.json"
-  },
-
-  "research_context": {
-    "research_question": "[original question]",
-    "key_themes": ["theme1", "theme2"],
-    "main_findings_summary": [
-      "Finding 1: [100-word summary]",
-      "Finding 2: [100-word summary]"
-    ],
-    "narrative_arc": "middle"
-  },
-
-  "quality_metrics": {
-    "avg_words_per_finding": 1500,
-    "citation_density": 5.2,
-    "prose_vs_bullets_ratio": "85% prose",
-    "writing_style": "technical-precise-data-driven"
-  },
-
-  "next_sections": [
-    {"id": 11, "type": "finding", "title": "Finding X", "target_words": 1500},
-    {"id": 12, "type": "synthesis", "title": "Synthesis", "target_words": 1000}
-  ]
-}
-```
-
----
-
-## Spawning Continuation Agent
-
-Use Task tool:
-
-```
-Task(
-  subagent_type="general-purpose",
-  description="Continue deep-research report generation",
-  prompt="""
-CONTINUATION TASK: Continue existing deep-research report.
-
-CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS:
-1. Read continuation state: ~/.claude/research_output/continuation_state_[report_id].json
-2. Read existing report: [file_path from state]
-3. Read LAST 3 completed sections for flow/style
-4. Load research context: themes, narrative arc, writing style
-5. Load source registry from state.artifacts.sources_path — use stable source_ids, assign display numbers via citation_manager.py
-6. Maintain quality metrics (avg words, citation density, prose ratio)
-
-YOUR TASK:
-Generate next batch (stay under 18,000 words):
-[List next_sections from state]
-
-Use Write/Edit to append to: [file_path]
-
-QUALITY GATES:
-- Words per section: Within +/-20% of avg_words_per_finding
-- Citation density: Match +/-0.5 per 1K words
-- Prose ratio: Maintain >=80%
-- Theme alignment: Section ties to key_themes
-
-After generating:
-- If more sections remain: Update state, spawn next agent
-- If final sections: Generate bibliography, verify report, cleanup state
-"""
-)
-```
-
----
-
-## Continuation Agent Quality Protocol
-
-### Context Loading (CRITICAL)
-
-1. Read continuation_state.json -> Load ALL context
-2. Read existing report file -> Review last 3 sections
-3. Extract patterns:
-   - Sentence structure complexity
-   - Technical terminology used
-   - Citation placement patterns
-   - Paragraph transition style
-
-### Pre-Generation Checklist
-
-- [ ] Loaded research context (themes, question, narrative arc)
-- [ ] Reviewed previous sections for flow
-- [ ] Loaded source registry from artifacts (stable source_ids, not citation numbers)
-- [ ] Loaded quality targets (words, density, style)
-- [ ] Understand narrative position (beginning/middle/end)
-
-### Per-Section Generation
-
-1. Generate section content
-2. Quality checks:
-   - Word count within +/-20%
-   - Citation density matches
-   - Prose ratio >=80%
-   - Theme connection verified
-   - Style consistent
-3. If ANY fails: Regenerate
-4. If passes: Write to file, update state
-
-### Handoff Decision
-
-Calculate: Current words + remaining sections x avg_words_per_section
-- If total < 18K: Generate all + finish
-- If total > 18K: Generate partial, update state, spawn next agent
-
-### Final Agent Responsibilities
-
-- Generate final content sections
-- Generate COMPLETE bibliography from state.citations.bibliography_entries
-- Read entire assembled report
-- Run validation: `python scripts/validate_report.py --report [path]`
-- Delete continuation_state.json (cleanup)
-- Report complete to user
-
----
-
-## User Communication
-
-After spawning continuation:
-```
-Report Generation: Part 1 Complete (N sections, X words)
-Auto-continuing via spawned agent...
-   Next batch: [section list]
-   Progress: [X%] complete
-```

package/dist/persona-defaults/persona-researcher/.claude/skills/deep-research/reference/html-generation.md

@@ -1,103 +0,0 @@
-# HTML Generation: McKinsey Style Report
-
-## Design Principles
-
-- Sharp corners (NO border-radius)
-- Muted corporate colors (navy #003d5c, gray #f8f9fa)
-- Ultra-compact layout
-- Info-first structure
-- 14px base font, compact spacing
-- No decorative gradients or colors
-- NO EMOJIS in final HTML
-
----
-
-## Generation Steps
-
-### Step 1: Read McKinsey Template
-Load template from: `./templates/mckinsey_report_template.html`
-
-### Step 2: Extract Key Metrics
-Extract 3-4 key quantitative findings for dashboard display at top.
-
-### Step 3: Convert MD to HTML
-
-Use Python script:
-```bash
-cd ~/.claude/skills/deep-research
-python scripts/md_to_html.py [markdown_report_path]
-```
-
-**Script outputs two parts:**
-- **Part A ({{CONTENT}}):** All sections except Bibliography
-- **Part B ({{BIBLIOGRAPHY}}):** Bibliography section only
-
-**Script handles all conversion:**
-- Headers: `##` -> `<div class="section"><h2 class="section-title">`
-- Headers: `###` -> `<h3 class="subsection-title">`
-- Lists: Markdown bullets -> `<ul><li>` with nesting
-- Tables: Markdown tables -> `<table>` with thead/tbody
-- Paragraphs: Text wrapped in `<p>` tags
-- Bold/italic: `**text**` -> `<strong>`, `*text*` -> `<em>`
-- Citations: [N] preserved for tooltip conversion
-
-### Step 4: Add Citation Tooltips (Optional)
-
-Attribution Gradients - wrap each [N] citation:
-```html
-<span class="citation">[N]
-  <span class="citation-tooltip">
-    <div class="tooltip-title">[Source Title]</div>
-    <div class="tooltip-source">[Author/Publisher]</div>
-    <div class="tooltip-claim">
-      <div class="tooltip-claim-label">Supports Claim:</div>
-      [Extract sentence with this citation]
-    </div>
-  </span>
-</span>
-```
-NOTE: This step is optional for speed. Basic [N] citations are sufficient.
-
-### Step 5: Replace Template Placeholders
-
-| Placeholder | Content |
-|-------------|---------|
-| {{TITLE}} | Report title (from first ## heading) |
-| {{DATE}} | Generation date (YYYY-MM-DD) |
-| {{SOURCE_COUNT}} | Number of unique sources |
-| {{METRICS_DASHBOARD}} | Metrics HTML from step 2 |
-| {{CONTENT}} | HTML from Part A |
-| {{BIBLIOGRAPHY}} | HTML from Part B |
-
-### Step 6: Verify HTML
-
-```bash
-python scripts/verify_html.py --html [html_path] --md [md_path]
-```
-- Pass: Proceed to open
-- Fail: Fix errors and re-run
-
-### Step 7: Open in Browser
-```bash
-open [html_path]
-```
-
----
-
-## PDF Generation
-
-**Option A: WeasyPrint Direct (Preferred)**
-
-1. Create print-optimized HTML following `./reference/weasyprint_guidelines.md`
-2. Critical CSS:
-   - `page-break-inside: avoid` on tables, boxes
-   - `page-break-after: avoid` on headings
-   - `orphans: 3; widows: 3` on paragraphs
-   - Use `display: table` not Flexbox/Grid
-   - Font sizes in pt (10pt body, 8pt citations)
-3. Generate: `weasyprint [html_path] [pdf_path]`
-4. Open: `open [pdf_path]`
-
-**Option B: generating-pdf Skill**
-
-Use Task tool with general-purpose agent, invoke generating-pdf skill.

package/dist/persona-defaults/persona-researcher/.claude/skills/deep-research/reference/methodology.md

@@ -1,421 +0,0 @@
-# Deep Research Methodology: 8-Phase Pipeline
-
-## Overview
-
-This document contains the detailed methodology for conducting deep research. The 8 phases represent a comprehensive approach to gathering, verifying, and synthesizing information from multiple sources.
-
----
-
-## Phase 1: SCOPE - Research Framing
-
-**Objective:** Define research boundaries and success criteria
-
-**Activities:**
-1. Decompose the question into core components
-2. Identify stakeholder perspectives
-3. Define scope boundaries (what's in/out)
-4. Establish success criteria
-5. List key assumptions to validate
-
-**Ultrathink Application:** Use extended reasoning to explore multiple framings of the question before committing to scope.
-
-**Output:** Structured scope document with research boundaries
-
----
-
-## Phase 2: PLAN - Strategy Formulation
-
-**Objective:** Create an intelligent research roadmap
-
-**Activities:**
-1. Identify primary and secondary sources
-2. Map knowledge dependencies (what must be understood first)
-3. Create search query strategy with variants
-4. Plan triangulation approach
-5. Estimate time/effort per phase
-6. Define quality gates
-
-**Graph-of-Thoughts:** Branch into multiple potential research paths, then converge on optimal strategy.
-
-**Output:** Research plan with prioritized investigation paths
-
----
-
-## Phase 3: RETRIEVE - Parallel Information Gathering
-
-**Objective:** Systematically collect information from multiple sources using parallel execution for maximum speed
-
-**CRITICAL: Execute ALL searches in parallel using a single message with multiple tool calls**
-
-### Query Decomposition Strategy
-
-Before launching searches, decompose the research question into 5-10 independent search angles:
-
-1. **Core topic (semantic search)** - Meaning-based exploration of main concept
-2. **Technical details (keyword search)** - Specific terms, APIs, implementations
-3. **Recent developments (date-filtered)** - What's new in last 12-18 months (use current date from Step 0)
-4. **Academic sources (domain-specific)** - Papers, research, formal analysis
-5. **Alternative perspectives (comparison)** - Competing approaches, criticisms
-6. **Statistical/data sources** - Quantitative evidence, metrics, benchmarks
-7. **Industry analysis** - Commercial applications, market trends
-8. **Critical analysis/limitations** - Known problems, failure modes, edge cases
-
-### Parallel Execution Protocol
-
-**Step 0: Get the current date**
-
-Before ANY searches, retrieve today's date using Bash: `date +%Y-%m-%d`
-Use the returned year for all date-filtered queries and recency checks. Do NOT assume a year from training data.
-
-**Step 1: Launch ALL searches concurrently (single message)**
-
-**CRITICAL: Use correct tool and parameters to avoid errors**
-
-**Primary: search-cli (multi-provider, always use first)**
-- Unified CLI aggregating Brave, Serper, Exa, Jina, and Firecrawl
-- Auto-detects best provider per query type (academic, news, general, people)
-- JSON output for structured processing: `search "query" --json`
-- Modes: general, news, academic, scholar, patents, people, images, extract, scrape
-- Example: `search "quantum computing 2025" -m academic --json -c 15`
-- For page content extraction: `search "URL" -m extract --json`
-- For scraping: `search "URL" -m scrape --json`
-- Run via Bash tool: `search "query" --json -c 10`
-
-**Fallback: WebSearch (if search-cli fails or is unavailable)**
-- Built-in Claude web search, no setup required
-- Parameters: `query` (required), optional `allowed_domains`, `blocked_domains`
-- Use when: search-cli returns errors, rate-limited, or for domain-restricted queries
-
-**Optional: Exa MCP (if configured, for semantic/neural search)**
-- Tool name: `mcp__Exa__exa_search`
-- Use for semantic exploration alongside search-cli keyword results
-
-
-**NEVER mix parameter styles** - this causes "Invalid tool parameters" errors.
-
-**Step 2: Spawn parallel deep-dive agents**
-
-Use Task tool with general-purpose agents (3-5 agents) for:
-- Academic paper analysis (PDFs, detailed extraction)
-- Documentation deep dives (technical specs, API docs)
-- Repository analysis (code examples, implementations)
-- Specialized domain research (requires multi-step investigation)
-
-**Sub-agent output format:** Require all sub-agents to return structured evidence, not free text:
-```json
-{"claim": "specific claim text", "evidence_quote": "exact quote from source", "source_url": "https://...", "source_title": "...", "confidence": 0.85}
-```
-This prevents synthesis fatigue when merging results from 3-5 agents.
-
-**Evidence persistence (v3.0):** After each retrieval batch, persist evidence immediately:
-```bash
-# Register the source first (returns stable source_id)
-python scripts/citation_manager.py register-source --json '{"raw_url": "...", "title": "..."}' --dir [folder]
-
-# Then persist each evidence span from that source
-python scripts/evidence_store.py add --json '{"source_id": "...", "quote": "exact text", "evidence_type": "direct_quote", "locator": "page 5"}' --dir [folder]
-```
-Evidence must not live only in model context — it must be persisted to `evidence.jsonl` before synthesis begins. This ensures continuation agents and claim-support verification can access the full evidence trail.
-
-**Example parallel execution (using search-cli via Bash):**
-```
-[Single message with multiple Bash tool calls]
-- Bash: search "quantum computing 2026 state of the art" --json -c 10
-- Bash: search "quantum computing limitations challenges" --json -c 10
-- Bash: search "quantum computing commercial applications 2026" -m news --json -c 10
-- Bash: search "quantum computing vs classical comparison" --json -c 10
-- Bash: search "quantum error correction research" -m academic --json -c 10
-- Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", description="Analyze quantum computing papers", prompt="Deep dive into quantum computing academic papers from [CURRENT_YEAR], extract key findings and methodologies")
-- Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", description="Industry analysis", prompt="Analyze quantum computing industry reports and market data, identify commercial applications")
-- Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", description="Technical challenges", prompt="Extract technical limitations and challenges from quantum computing research")
-```
-
-**Example parallel execution (using Exa MCP - if available):**
-```
-[Single message with multiple tool calls]
-- mcp__Exa__exa_search(query="quantum computing state of the art", type="neural", num_results=10, start_published_date="[use current year from Step 0]")
-- mcp__Exa__exa_search(query="quantum computing limitations", type="keyword", num_results=10)
-- mcp__Exa__exa_search(query="quantum computing commercial", type="auto", num_results=10, start_published_date="[use current year from Step 0]")
-- mcp__Exa__exa_search(query="quantum error correction", type="neural", num_results=10, include_domains=["arxiv.org"])
-- Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", description="Academic analysis", prompt="Analyze quantum computing academic papers")
-```
-
-**Step 3: Collect and organize results**
-
-As results arrive:
-1. Extract key passages with source metadata (title, URL, date, credibility)
-2. Track information gaps that emerge
-3. Follow promising tangents with additional targeted searches
-4. Maintain source diversity (mix academic, industry, news, technical docs)
-5. Monitor for quality threshold (see FFS pattern below)
-
-### First Finish Search (FFS) Pattern
-
-**Adaptive completion based on quality threshold:**
-
-**Quality gate:** Proceed to Phase 4 when FIRST threshold reached:
-- **Quick mode:** 10+ sources with avg credibility >60/100 OR 2 minutes elapsed
-- **Standard mode:** 15+ sources with avg credibility >60/100 OR 5 minutes elapsed
-- **Deep mode:** 25+ sources with avg credibility >70/100 OR 10 minutes elapsed
-- **UltraDeep mode:** 30+ sources with avg credibility >75/100 OR 15 minutes elapsed
-
-**Continue background searches:**
-- If threshold reached early, continue remaining parallel searches in background
-- Additional sources used in Phase 5 (SYNTHESIZE) for depth and diversity
-- Allows fast progression without sacrificing thoroughness
-
-### Quality Standards
-
-**Source diversity requirements:**
-- Minimum 3 source types (academic, industry, news, technical docs)
-- Temporal diversity (mix of recent 12-18 months + foundational older sources)
-- Perspective diversity (proponents + critics + neutral analysis)
-- Geographic diversity (not just US sources)
-
-**Credibility tracking:**
-- Score each source 0-100 using source_evaluator.py
-- Flag low-credibility sources (<40) for additional verification
-- Prioritize high-credibility sources (>80) for core claims
-
-**Techniques:**
-- Use search-cli for all searches (primary tool, multi-provider)
-- Fall back to WebSearch if search-cli fails or is rate-limited
-- Use WebFetch for deep dives into specific sources (secondary)
-- Use Exa search (via WebSearch with type="neural") for semantic exploration
-- Use Grep/Read for local documentation
-- Execute code for computational analysis (when needed)
-- Use Task tool to spawn parallel retrieval agents (3-5 agents)
-
-**Output:** Organized information repository with source tracking, credibility scores, and coverage map
-
----
-
-## Phase 4: TRIANGULATE - Cross-Reference Verification
-
-**Objective:** Validate information across multiple independent sources
-
-**Activities:**
-1. Identify claims requiring verification
-2. Cross-reference facts across 3+ sources
-3. Flag contradictions or uncertainties
-4. Assess source credibility
-5. Note consensus vs. debate areas
-6. Document verification status per claim
-
-**Quality Standards:**
-- Core claims must have 3+ independent sources
-- Flag any single-source information
-- Note recency of information
-- Identify potential biases
-
-**Output:** Verified fact base with confidence levels
-
----
-
-## Phase 4.5: OUTLINE REFINEMENT - Dynamic Evolution (WebWeaver 2025)
-
-**Objective:** Adapt research direction based on evidence discovered
-
-**Problem Solved:** Prevents "locked-in" research when evidence points to different conclusions or uncovers more important angles than initially planned.
-
-**When to Execute:**
-- **Standard/Deep/UltraDeep modes only** (Quick mode skips this)
-- After Phase 4 (TRIANGULATE) completes
-- Before Phase 5 (SYNTHESIZE)
-
-**Activities:**
-
-1. **Review Initial Scope vs. Actual Findings**
-   - Compare Phase 1 scope with Phase 3-4 discoveries
-   - Identify unexpected patterns or contradictions
-   - Note underexplored angles that emerged as critical
-   - Flag overexplored areas that proved less important
-
-2. **Evaluate Outline Adaptation Need**
-
-   **Signals for adaptation (ANY triggers refinement):**
-   - Major findings contradict initial assumptions
-   - Evidence reveals more important angle than originally scoped
-   - Critical subtopic emerged that wasn't in original plan
-   - Original research question was too broad/narrow based on evidence
-   - Sources consistently discuss aspects not in initial outline
-
-   **Signals to keep current outline:**
-   - Evidence aligns with initial scope
-   - All key angles adequately covered
-   - No major gaps or surprises
-
-3. **Refine Outline (if needed)**
-
-   **Update structure to reflect evidence:**
-   - Add sections for unexpected but important findings
-   - Demote/remove sections with insufficient evidence
-   - Reorder sections based on evidence strength and importance
-   - Adjust scope boundaries based on what's actually discoverable
-
-   **Example adaptation:**
-   ```
-   Original outline:
-   1. Introduction
-   2. Technical Architecture
-   3. Performance Benchmarks
-   4. Conclusion
-
-   Refined after Phase 4 (evidence revealed security as critical):
-   1. Introduction
-   2. Technical Architecture
-   3. **Security Vulnerabilities (NEW - major finding)**
-   4. Performance Benchmarks (demoted - less critical than expected)
-   5. **Real-World Failure Modes (NEW - pattern emerged)**
-   6. Synthesis & Recommendations
-   ```
-
-4. **Targeted Gap Filling (if major gaps found)**
-
-   If outline refinement reveals critical knowledge gaps:
-   - Launch 2-3 targeted searches for newly identified angles
-   - Quick retrieval only (don't restart full Phase 3)
-   - Time-box to 2-5 minutes
-   - Update triangulation for new evidence only
-
-5. **Document Adaptation Rationale**
-
-   Record in methodology appendix:
-   - What changed in outline
-   - Why it changed (evidence-driven reasons)
-   - What additional research was conducted (if any)
-
-**Quality Standards:**
-- Adaptation must be evidence-driven (cite specific sources that prompted change)
-- No more than 50% outline restructuring (if more needed, scope was severely mis scoped)
-- Retain original research question core (don't drift into different topic entirely)
-- New sections must have supporting evidence already gathered
-
-**Output:** Refined outline that accurately reflects evidence landscape, ready for synthesis
-
-**Anti-Pattern Warning:**
-- ❌ DON'T adapt outline based on speculation or "what would be interesting"
-- ❌ DON'T add sections without supporting evidence already in hand
-- ❌ DON'T completely abandon original research question
-- ✅ DO adapt when evidence clearly indicates better structure
-- ✅ DO document rationale for changes
-- ✅ DO stay within original topic scope
-
----
-
-## Phase 5: SYNTHESIZE - Deep Analysis
-
-**Objective:** Connect insights and generate novel understanding
-
-**Activities:**
-1. Identify patterns across sources
-2. Map relationships between concepts
-3. Generate insights beyond source material
-4. Create conceptual frameworks
-5. Build argument structures
-6. Develop evidence hierarchies
-
-**Ultrathink Integration:** Use extended reasoning to explore non-obvious connections and second-order implications.
-
-**Output:** Synthesized understanding with insight generation
-
----
-
-## Phase 6: CRITIQUE - Quality Assurance
-
-**Objective:** Rigorously evaluate research quality
-
-**Activities:**
-1. Review for logical consistency
-2. Check citation completeness
-3. Identify gaps or weaknesses
-4. Assess balance and objectivity
-5. Verify claims against sources
-6. Test alternative interpretations
-
-**Red Team Questions:**
-- What's missing?
-- What could be wrong?
-- What alternative explanations exist?
-- What biases might be present?
-- What counterfactuals should be considered?
-
-**Persona-Based Critique (Deep/UltraDeep only):**
-Simulate 2-3 specific critic personas relevant to the topic:
-- "Skeptical Practitioner" — Would someone doing this daily trust these findings?
-- "Adversarial Reviewer" — What would a peer reviewer reject?
-- "Implementation Engineer" — Can these recommendations actually be executed?
-
-**Critical Gap Loop-Back:**
-If critique identifies a critical knowledge gap (not just a writing issue), return to Phase 3 with targeted "delta-queries" before proceeding to Phase 7. Time-box to 3-5 minutes. This prevents publishing reports with known blind spots.
-
-**Output:** Critique report with improvement recommendations
-
----
-
-## Phase 7: REFINE - Iterative Improvement
-
-**Objective:** Address gaps and strengthen weak areas
-
-**Activities:**
-1. Conduct additional research for gaps
-2. Strengthen weak arguments
-3. Add missing perspectives
-4. Resolve contradictions
-5. Enhance clarity
-6. Verify revised content
-
-**Output:** Strengthened research with addressed deficiencies
-
----
-
-## Phase 8: PACKAGE - Report Generation
-
-**Objective:** Deliver professional, actionable research
-
-**Activities:**
-1. Structure report with clear hierarchy
-2. Write executive summary
-3. Develop detailed sections
-4. Create visualizations (tables, diagrams)
-5. Compile full bibliography
-6. Add methodology appendix
-
-**Output:** Complete research report ready for use
-
----
-
-## Advanced Features
-
-### Graph-of-Thoughts Reasoning
-
-Rather than linear thinking, branch into multiple reasoning paths:
-- Explore alternative framings in parallel
-- Pursue tangential leads that might be relevant
-- Merge insights from different branches
-- Backtrack and revise as new information emerges
-
-### Parallel Agent Deployment
-
-Use Task tool to spawn sub-agents for:
-- Parallel source retrieval
-- Independent verification paths
-- Competing hypothesis evaluation
-- Specialized domain analysis
-
-### Adaptive Depth Control
-
-Automatically adjust research depth based on:
-- Information complexity
-- Source availability
-- Time constraints
-- Confidence levels
-
-### Citation Intelligence
-
-Smart citation management:
-- Track provenance of every claim
-- Link to original sources
-- Assess source credibility
-- Handle conflicting sources
-- Generate proper bibliographies