@chrono-meta/fh-gate 1.4.58 → 1.4.59

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -11,13 +11,13 @@
11
11
  "plugins": [
12
12
  {
13
13
  "name": "fh-meta",
14
- "version": "1.4.58",
14
+ "version": "1.4.59",
15
15
  "description": "Hub meta-operations toolkit — 33 skills + 7 agents. New in 1.4.53: `fh-codex-doctor` (npm bin) — Codex adapter drift scanner; reads the documented M1/M2/M3 skill tier map + skill/agent source and reports codex-native/adapter-required/claude-native/unclassified per unit, wired into `npm test`/`prepublishOnly` (fail-closed on unclassified Claude-native primitives). New in 1.4.49: steel-quench gains Step 0.6 Verdict-Invariance Probe (groundedness axis — a load-bearing judged gate's verdict must track behavior, not rubric phrasing; measured flip-count over cross-family paraphrases; arXiv:2605.06161 Policy Invariance anchor); multi_model_sidecar_strategy §Vendor-native harness (a model is strongest in its own vendor CLI — Claude/CC, GPT/codex, Gemini/Antigravity; a universal router degrades all of them, so it stays an autocomplete/QA sidecar, never orchestration); predelete_check.sh fail-closed rewrite; memory-hygiene A-TMA anchor. New in 1.4.48: phantom-quench + steel-quench gain external frontier anchors (arXiv:2607.02052 package-hallucination; arXiv:2607.02057 prompt-coverage-adequacy); README model-flat claim reframed from a per-release point-curve to structural invariants (operation flattens across tiers; depth tier-order fixed within a generation). New in 1.4.47: onboarding step ① surfaces the Mode D companion-store session-start load in the auto-read salience anchor (previously only in the local binding + rules, so a greeting could skip the load). New in 1.4.46: context-doctor command-output axis (route to rtk/proxy for verbose CLI stdout, complementing .claudeignore; risk-gated to token-scarce envs). New in 1.4.41: context-doctor 2026 trigger vocab (context engineering/rot/collapse) + phantom-citation hardening; hub measurement-integrity-checklist (cross-model measurement pre-flight: display-name pin/reps≥3/discriminating probe). New in 1.4.40: install-wizard queryable-wiki scaffold (INDEX + session-start read + R/W/C ingest). New in 1.4.39: auto-decorrelation (cross-family verifier sidecar recruitment) + video-ingest (capability-routed video ingestion). New in 1.4.x: verify-axis check-class taxonomy (mandatory-pass/measured/judged), no-reinvention Tier-0 inventory, 7-class failure taxonomy, Destructive-Op Gate, Wave-T (Temper), tier-floor governance, Mode D Model Notice, FC consent lane, default-Sonnet guidance. New in 1.3.0: public-surface-audit, field-harvest Mode B auto-trigger, 4-axis gate scope ext. Validated cross-CLI: Claude Code, Codex, Gemini.",
16
16
  "source": "./plugins/fh-meta"
17
17
  },
18
18
  {
19
19
  "name": "fh-commons",
20
- "version": "1.4.58",
20
+ "version": "1.4.59",
21
21
  "description": "Project-agnostic utility skills — 4 skills (convergence-loop · deliberation · mcp-circuit-breaker · token-budget-gate) + 1 agent (quench-challenger). Domain-independent utilities transplantable into any project.",
22
22
  "source": "./plugins/fh-commons"
23
23
  }
package/CLAUDE.md CHANGED
@@ -82,6 +82,25 @@ Two orthogonal layers — never collapse them.
82
82
  judgment rigor — if a response reads as more agreeable, less verified, or hedged, the tone layer has
83
83
  leaked into the judgment layer and the response is wrong, not warm.
84
84
 
85
+ ## Envelope-Boundary Discipline — the reinvention-reflex counterweight
86
+
87
+ When the operator's input introduces something that does **not** fit an existing asset or category — a
88
+ novel insight, a specific case that resists the known boxes, a live path with no slot — the default
89
+ reflex is to **normalize** it ("we have that / that's like X") and pull it back inside the envelope.
90
+ That pull mis-scores the new as familiar and can extinguish what would become net-new. The entire asset
91
+ base leans toward normalization (no-reinvention gate · `asset-placement-gate` · "build only what adds
92
+ governance"), so this is its deliberate **counterweight** — and the reflex **strengthens with maturity**
93
+ (more boxes to pattern-match against), so the counterweight must be explicit, never assumed.
94
+
95
+ **Discipline**: at the boundary, do **not** normalize. Hold the unfamiliar unfamiliar; test what it
96
+ actually *is* — net-new? tool-shaped (→ possible EMIT) or judgment-shaped (→ doctrine)? — **before**
97
+ mapping it to a known asset. This is the meta-harness's growth point: it evolves by *not-collapsing the
98
+ unfamiliar*, not by adding machinery. The reflex fires **before** memory recall, so this lives
99
+ always-loaded, not only in memory. (Measured 2026-07-14, one session, 3×: two identities each collapsed
100
+ onto their single hardest sub-mechanism, and a failure from a **non-harness** run mapped onto a harness
101
+ metric — each read a live-but-incomplete thing as zero, each caught by the operator, not self-caught.
102
+ Detail: `[[feedback_reinvention_reflex_normalization_counterweight]]`.)
103
+
85
104
  ## New Project Onboarding
86
105
 
87
106
  > Detailed procedure: `knowledge/shared/rules/auto_project_mapping.md` (5-step mapping + §6 Full-Harness Mode)
@@ -459,6 +478,10 @@ let the innovator center a recommend cascade, produce a ranked install plan, and
459
478
  **Guards**: (a) **non-overwriting is inviolable** — the one thing both revfactory surfaces get wrong; FH
460
479
  proposes merge, never clobbers; (b) **no-reinvention** — Tier 0/1 first, scaffold only what adds governance;
461
480
  (c) **company residency** — discovery of a company sibling repo surfaces it, does not auto-map/leak it;
481
+ promoted to a machine field (`residency` on the skill registry, `fh_detail_protocols.md §1-c`) so any
482
+ derived recommendation naming a `company`/`operator-private` entry lands only in gitignored `tracks/_meta/`
483
+ or the private companion store, never a tracked public file (chamber run #7, 2026-07-14 — the guard was
484
+ prose-only and the field didn't exist);
462
485
  (d) **autonomy floor** — the discover/rank judgment is trusted at opus-tier+; below-floor, present the raw
463
486
  recommend and ask; (e) **once per door-entry**, not a per-turn nag. This is the door ③ (accelerate) engine
464
487
  and the new-project/harness-write path made autonomous — the operator asks once and the harness discovers,
@@ -58,10 +58,26 @@ Then **fail-closed** (irreversible-ish: a silent empty overwrite blinds the bus)
58
58
  **and** the existing registry has >0 entries, do **not** overwrite — flag `⚠️ scan returned 0 (root=$ROOT);
59
59
  kept existing registry` and skip the rewrite. Only rewrite when the scan is non-empty (or the registry
60
60
  was absent). Group by project (parent dir name). Record per skill: name · path · description · trigger
61
- phrases · `requires_cwd` · `direct-executable` · `origin(FH|project|external)`+trust. **Non-FH skills are
62
- propose-only (ask-tier), never auto-run** — a cross-project skill body is an injection surface. Propose
63
- cross-project skills when a request maps to the registry. Scan once per session. (Detection belongs at
64
- install too `/install-wizard` records HUB/ROOT so the runtime never guesses; see install-wizard.)
61
+ phrases · `requires_cwd` · `direct-executable` · `origin(FH|project|external)`+trust ·
62
+ **`residency(public|company|operator-private)`** · **`generality(general-purpose|project-specific)`**.
63
+ **Non-FH skills are propose-only (ask-tier), never auto-run** a cross-project skill body is an
64
+ injection surface. Propose cross-project skills when a request maps to the registry. Scan once per
65
+ session. (Detection belongs at install too — `/install-wizard` records HUB/ROOT so the runtime never
66
+ guesses; see install-wizard.)
67
+
68
+ **`residency` derivation (mechanical, not asserted)** — from the project's git remote at scan time:
69
+ company org/account (e.g. a known company-dev namespace) → `company`; the operator's own account, repo
70
+ not `public` on the host → `operator-private`; else → `public`. **`generality` derivation (judged, not
71
+ mechanical — the scan flags a candidate, a session confirms)**: a skill whose description names no
72
+ project/company-specific noun and needs no project-local context to run elsewhere → `general-purpose`
73
+ candidate; confirmed only when a session actually reads the skill body and judges it works outside its
74
+ origin project (never auto-confirmed from the tag alone — chamber run #7, 2026-07-14, found the
75
+ generality field itself absent and the confirmed-general-purpose seed count effectively 0, which is
76
+ exactly the gap these two fields close). **Output landing-surface rule** (residency-restricted
77
+ combinations must never reach a public surface): any derived recommendation, "better-together" list, or
78
+ synergy output that names a `company`/`operator-private` residency entry lands **only** in gitignored
79
+ `tracks/_meta/` (or the private companion store) — **never** in tracked `tracks/{project}/` or any other
80
+ public-tracked file. A `public`-only combination may land in tracked docs.
65
81
 
66
82
  ### Step 2 — Active Proposal
67
83
 
@@ -99,19 +99,38 @@ this chamber's field emit terminus); an **FH-internal utility** (a skill/script/
99
99
  field harness) instead routes through the **New-Skill Pre-Commit gate + `asset-placement-gate`** (the
100
100
  same gate every FH asset passes). KILL emits nothing — the workspace stays as the evidence record.
101
101
 
102
- **EMIT-worthiness — the measured screening criterion (run #5, 2026-07-14)**: five chamber runs, EMIT 0/5,
103
- all KILL. Run #5 (`degrade-lint`) measured *why* the chamber has not birthed, and the finding is a reusable
104
- screen: a candidate is emit-worthy only if it clears **all three** of (1) **net-new** (not a reinvention
105
- of an existing FH/official asset, nor a cosmetic re-wrap of code that already ships runs #2–#4 died here);
102
+ **EMIT-worthiness — the measured screening criterion (runs #5–#6, 2026-07-14)**: six chamber runs, EMIT
103
+ 0/6, all KILL. A candidate is emit-worthy only if it clears **all four** of (1) **net-new** (not a
104
+ reinvention of an existing FH/official asset, nor a cosmetic re-wrap of code that already ships runs
105
+ #2–#4 died here, and run #6 partially here too its core was already conceived in a parked FH signal);
106
106
  (2) **artifact-shaped** (a tool/script/rule that stands alone, *not* a judgment-method — run #5's genuine
107
107
  niche was real, but its value lived in a scan∪cross-family *lens*, i.e. an LLM judgment, which cannot be
108
- `npm publish`ed); (3) **real-code-precision-adequate** (its mechanical form, measured on real external code,
109
- does not cry-wolf — run #5's rule scored 5/5 false-positive on 111 real files because the fail-open shape is
110
- syntactically identical to ubiquitous-benign skip-if-empty code; the real/benign split is semantic, not
111
- grep-able). 0/5 candidates cleared all three. This is not "keep trying" it is a **pre-screen for future
112
- candidates**: a KILL that fails (1) or (2) is cheap to predict; only (3) needs a measurement leg (semgrep
113
- baseline + real-repo FP run), which run #5 established as the decisive test. The chamber's honest value to
114
- date remains *screening* preventing reinventions and low-precision births not yet *birthing*.
108
+ `npm publish`ed); (3) **real-code/real-data-precision-adequate** (its mechanical form, measured on real
109
+ external inputs, does not cry-wolf — run #5's rule scored 5/5 false-positive on 111 real files; run #6's
110
+ heuristic scored 14/22 false-fire on a real sibling-folder scan); (4) **hub-state-independent** (run #6,
111
+ new axis a capability whose value structurally depends on hub-held state, e.g. the curated registry +
112
+ company-residency knowledge, is not a standalone-first candidate: run #6's `harness-orchestrator` hit
113
+ private/company repos it structurally could not know to suppress, because residency knowledge lives only
114
+ in the hub. Contrast with fh-commons's 4 skills, which graduated cleanly to portable precisely because they
115
+ never depended on hub state). 0/6 candidates cleared all four. This is not "keep trying" — it is a
116
+ **pre-screen for future candidates**, cheapest-to-costliest: (1)/(2)/(4) are cheap to predict from the
117
+ candidate's own design (does it need hub-only knowledge to work correctly?); only (3) needs a measurement
118
+ leg (a real-input precision run), which runs #5–#6 established as the decisive test. The chamber's honest
119
+ value to date remains *screening* — preventing reinventions, low-precision births, and premature
120
+ standalone graduations — not yet *birthing*. **Graduation order** (run #6's positive finding): a
121
+ hub-state-dependent capability graduates hub-internal → proven in use → THEN extracted portable, never
122
+ speculated standalone-first — the only path every successfully-portable FH asset actually took.
123
+
124
+ **Chamber scope — what belongs in the chamber at all (run #7, 2026-07-14)**: run #7 tested a hub-internal
125
+ reactivation of the cluster-wizard signal and KILLed it — decisively on its own merits (its "narrow
126
+ net-new" claim collapsed against the real shipped registry and an already-existing synergy skill), but
127
+ it also surfaced a scope question worth keeping regardless: **a small feature graft onto an
128
+ already-shipped hub-internal mechanism is ordinary Mode D self-development under the 4-axis gate, not
129
+ automatically a chamber-EMIT question.** The chamber screens candidates that would become a **new
130
+ independent artifact** (a skill, a plugin, a standalone tool) — not every internal feature extension.
131
+ Route by this test: *would this, if built, be net-new as a standalone thing someone installs/adopts, or
132
+ is it two lines added to something already shipped?* The former is chamber-scope; the latter is ordinary
133
+ self-dev review.
115
134
 
116
135
  *Vocabulary reservation (term hygiene, not standardization)*: a run of this skeleton is a **chamber
117
136
  run** — going forward, run/workspace/log labels use "chamber" for incubation and keep "sim/simulation"
@@ -109,20 +109,26 @@ decision is logged here and the tag's notes state the real status.
109
109
  | ③ | 거버넌스 게이트 (governance) | 🟢 GREEN | pre-commit/pre-push physically block; moat measured 3–4 family blind (HITL 8/8 ABSENT); cross-family caught a real companion-store-name leak 2026-07-14 (fail-closed) |
110
110
  | ⑤ | 증폭자 (amplifier) | 🟢 GREEN | short-intent→literature-grounding→ultimate-doc real instances; rules-diet −18.2k measured; intent-routing probe 94% (below) |
111
111
  | ④ | 프런티어→조직 전파 | 🟡 YELLOW | frontier-digest launchd auto + AX submission docs both real, but digest→org never closed as ONE pipeline |
112
- | ① | 멀티하네스 클러스터 (연속경유) | 🔴 RED | mapping/routing materials work, but continuous relay channel + external-harness recommend are "not built yet" (source-admitted); cluster-wizard parked |
113
- | ② | 프로젝트 인큐베이터 (챔버 EMIT) | 🔴 RED | chamber ran **5×, EMIT (5 KILL)**. run #5 (2026-07-14) *measured* why it hasn't birthed: all 5 candidates were either **reinventions** (#2 sim-conductor, #3 G4/resume, #4 steel-quench) or a **non-artifact judgment-method** (#5 degrade-lint a genuine niche, but the mechanical rule scored **5/5 false-positive on 111 real qasp files**; the valuable capability is scan∪cross-family *judgment*, which cannot be shipped as a standalone tool). A real EMIT needs **net-new ∧ artifact-shaped ∧ real-code-precision-adequate** 0/5 cleared all three. Runner wired; the gap is a candidate, not the pipe |
112
+ | ① | 멀티하네스 클러스터 | 🟡 PARTIAL | routing runs for real — 17 nodes mapped, sidecar-orchestrator, Skill Bus routing qasp/dashboard/stockbattle (so NOT 🔴 ideal-only). Missing: continuous 2-node relay channel + external-harness recommend (cluster-wizard parked) → 🟡 not 🟢 |
113
+ | ② | 프로젝트 인큐베이터 | 🟡 PARTIAL | incubation is running **stockbattle is being incubated now** (S1 built, mid-flight) + qasp/pmh spin-out precedent + scaffold-emit shipped (doctrine: "emit shipped today as scaffold+approval; the chamber flow is the named target"). What's still 0 is the **formal chamber simulate-then-emit** mechanism (6 runs, 6 KILL runs #5–#6 *measured* the emit-worthiness criterion: net-new ∧ artifact-shaped ∧ real-data-precision-adequate hub-state-independent, 0/6 cleared all four; run #6 also confirmed the graduation-order principle hub-internal proof before standalone extraction, never the reverse). That mechanism is ONE path of ②, not the whole identity → 🔴 was too narrow; incubation runs but no closed emit-via-incubation yet → 🟡 |
114
114
 
115
115
  **Cross-cutting measured (intent-based autonomous completion)**: blind floor-tier Sonnet trigger-accuracy
116
116
  probe (n=10, 2026-07-14): **should-fire 7.5/8 (94%), false-fire 0/2**. One weak trigger (simulate-first /
117
117
  incubator entry absorbed into deep-clarify) — the identity-② weakness surfaces in routing too.
118
118
 
119
- **Verdict (2026-07-14)**: FH is tagged **`v0.1.0` = honest baseline**, not all-green. ③⑤ are 🟢, ④ 🟡,
120
- ①② 🔴 — the `v0.1.0` notes state exactly this and make no all-green claim (per the refined 0.x↔1.0 mapping
121
- above). **`v1.0.0` remains the all-green target.** What blocks v1.0 is **real runs, not wiring**: ①'s live
122
- 2-node orchestration, ②'s first *net-new artifact-shaped precision-adequate* chamber candidate (the
123
- measured criterion from run #5), ④'s closed digest→org pipeline. Each remedy is a run that leaves an
124
- artifact, tracked in `tracks/_meta/identity_audit_*.md`. The honest baseline is publishable *because* 0.x
125
- carries an incomplete status by design; forcing a green it hasn't earned would be the theater the gate bars.
119
+ **Verdict (2026-07-14, ①② corrected)**: FH is tagged **`v0.1.0` = honest baseline**, not all-green. ③⑤ are
120
+ 🟢, ①②④ 🟡, **none 🔴** — the `v0.1.0` notes state this and make no all-green claim (per the refined 0.x↔1.0
121
+ mapping above). **`v1.0.0` remains the all-green target.** What blocks v1.0 is **closing the 🟡s**: ①'s
122
+ continuous 2-node relay channel, ②'s first closed emit-via-incubation (formal chamber first EMIT criterion
123
+ measured in run #5 — or a chamber-incubated spin-out closing), ④'s closed digest→org pipeline. Each remedy
124
+ is a run that leaves an artifact, tracked in `tracks/_meta/identity_audit_*.md`.
125
+
126
+ > **①② correction (2026-07-14)**: an earlier pass marked ①② 🔴 by collapsing each identity onto its most
127
+ > advanced *single mechanism* — ② onto the formal chamber EMIT (0/5), ① onto the continuous-relay channel.
128
+ > That contradicts the doctrine (emit is "shipped today as scaffold+approval; the chamber is the named
129
+ > target") and the live reality (routing runs; **stockbattle is being incubated now**; qasp/pmh spun out).
130
+ > An identity whose broad path *runs* is not 🔴 ideal-only. Both are 🟡: running, not yet closed. Lesson:
131
+ > do not score an identity by its hardest sub-mechanism — that reads a live-but-incomplete path as zero.
126
132
 
127
133
  ## For a field harness (e.g. pmh, qasp)
128
134
  Same gate, its own identities. A field harness ships to its team when its identity checklist is all-green,
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@chrono-meta/fh-gate",
3
- "version": "1.4.58",
3
+ "version": "1.4.59",
4
4
  "description": "FH runtime adapters — run FH governance, skills, and agents via Claude or Codex with machine-parseable gates.",
5
5
  "license": "MIT",
6
6
  "keywords": [
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "fh-commons",
3
- "version": "1.4.58",
3
+ "version": "1.4.59",
4
4
  "engines": {
5
5
  "claudeCode": ">=1.0.0"
6
6
  },
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "fh-meta",
3
- "version": "1.4.58",
3
+ "version": "1.4.59",
4
4
  "engines": {
5
5
  "claudeCode": ">=1.0.0"
6
6
  },