@chrono-meta/fh-gate 1.4.26 → 1.4.27

package/CLAUDE.md

@@ -141,7 +141,19 @@ All 6 items below must pass before committing a new SKILL.md. If any fails, fix
 
 Skills without a Done When definition automatically qualify as harness-doctor L2 M-tier.
 Check-class declaration applies to **new** skills; existing skills backfill opportunistically
-(when next edited), not retroactively.
+(when next edited), not retroactively. **Trigger-accuracy probe backfill** follows the same
+opportunistic rule but scoped to **routing/gate skills only**: when an existing router/gate skill is
+edited (especially when its trigger phrases change), run steel-quench `Step 0.5 — Trigger-Accuracy
+Probe` on the changed trigger surface and record the fire-count — turning "do these triggers collide?"
+from a guess into a number. Not a retroactive sweep of all routers (that would be decorative
+over-work); it rides the edit that touches the router. **One-time baseline floor** (closes the
+never-edited-router gap — a stable router accumulates the most un-probed traffic): existing
+routing/gate skills get **one** baseline Step-0.5 probe at the next `harness-doctor` run (the 30-day
+cadence already enumerates skills), then opportunistic-on-edit thereafter — a single baseline pass,
+not a recurring sweep. **"routing/gate skill" (mechanical test)**: a skill whose *primary output is a
+dispatch decision or a pass/block verdict* — e.g. `agent-composer`, `goal-quench`, `asset-placement-gate`,
+`return-path-gate`, `phantom-quench` — NOT a skill that merely calls others as sub-steps (e.g.
+`harvest-loop`).
 
 ---
 
@@ -161,7 +173,17 @@ FH asset modified → Axis 1 (regression_guard.sh --pr {BRANCH})
       hook validates mechanically: below-floor blocks without below-floor-ack, and
       axis2-evidence must be non-vacuous — a recorded verdict/count, not "it ran". Honest
       scope: form + non-vacuity + auditability, NOT provenance — a fabricated marker is the
-      weekly audit's + operator's residual by design, judge-robustness swarm 2026-06-13)
+      weekly audit's + operator's residual by design, judge-robustness swarm 2026-06-13.
+      The below-floor-ack rubber-stamp is **structurally IRREDUCIBLE for an autonomous runner**: the
+      runner writes both the marker AND any transcript the hook could cross-check, so any in-boundary
+      check it can satisfy it can also forge (a runner-computed signature is false security). The one
+      genuine close needs a secret the runner does NOT hold — an **operator-present hard-close**: a
+      GPG-signed trailer **whose key requires a fresh interactive passphrase** (NOT an agent-cached
+      gpg-agent key, and NOT operator-git-identity alone — `user.email` is config the runner already
+      writes, forgeable, not a secret). The real guarantee is *uncached private-key access*, not commit
+      identity; optional, breaks full autonomy, use only when the operator is at the keyboard. Autonomous mode keeps the honest
+      residual + weekly-audit backstop — do NOT fake-close it. Gemini cross-analysis 2026-06-16 reached
+      this verdict independently, converging with the existing FH stance)
   → Axis 4 (/edit-manifest RECORD, today's entry in edit_manifest.yaml)
   → All 4 PASS → git commit allowed   |   Any FAIL → fix inline, re-run
 ```

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "@chrono-meta/fh-gate",
-  "version": "1.4.26",
+  "version": "1.4.27",
   "description": "FH runtime adapters — run FH governance, skills, and agents via Claude or Codex with machine-parseable gates.",
   "license": "MIT",
   "keywords": [

package/plugins/fh-meta/skills/context-bridge-dispatch/SKILL.md

@@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ successor: agent-composer
 
 ## Content preserved at
 
-`plugins/fh-meta/skills/agent-composer/SKILL.md §Step 3-a`
+`plugins/fh-meta/skills/agent-composer/SKILL.md §Step 3-a` — the live successor.
 
-> **Detail**: See `SKILL_detail.md §Archive` — full original content preserved — read only for historical reference.
+> The original pre-merge content is preserved in git history (this stub's earlier revisions); the
+> shipped `SKILL_detail.md` archive was removed in the curator shrink (2026-06-16) as redundant with
+> git history. No live content lost — the functional content lives in agent-composer Step 3-a.
 
 ## Done When
 

package/plugins/fh-meta/skills/edit-manifest/SKILL.md

@@ -43,11 +43,26 @@ edit history and negative-feedback buffer.
   predicted_impact: "users entering via phrase X will increase — estimate +1 session/week"
   predicted_measurable_by: "session start logs or user utterance pattern in next 2 sessions"
   validation_status: pending   # pending | verified | falsified | untestable
+  validation_type: judged      # mechanical (grep/count/git) | judged (cited observation) | untestable
+  baseline_value: null         # number, when a metric exists (mechanical)
+  measured_value: null         # filled at VERIFY
+  delta: null                  # measured_value - baseline_value, or null
+  match_score: null            # at VERIFY: 1.0 confirmed | 0.5 partial | 0.0 contradicted
   verified_at: null
-  verification_note: null
-  gate_decision: null   # accepted | rejected
+  verification_note: null      # one-line MEASURED outcome + cited evidence (never bare "seems better")
+  gate_decision: null   # accepted | redefine | rejected
 ```
 
+> **Status vocabulary is canonical and machine-greppable** — `validation_status` MUST be one of
+> `pending | verified | falsified | untestable`, never freeform prose. The verify pass (Step V1)
+> greps these literals; a freeform status like `"predicted — verify next session"` is **invisible to
+> the grep and silently never closes the loop** (the format-reconciliation bug fixed 2026-06-16 — put
+> the prose in `predicted_measurable_by`, keep `validation_status: pending`).
+>
+> `baseline_value` / `measured_value` / `delta` apply to **mechanical** entries only; judged and
+> untestable entries leave them `null`. **`match_score` is the gate input (Step V3) for all types** —
+> the numeric fields are a mechanical-entry audit detail, not a second gate signal.
+
 ## Trigger Conditions
 
 ### Automatic — Record Phase (on every FH asset edit)
@@ -105,14 +120,37 @@ that the edit rationale needs sharpening.
 **Step V1 — Load Pending Entries**
 
 ```bash
-grep -A20 "validation_status: pending" tracks/_meta/edit_manifest.yaml
+# canonical pending + legacy freeform "predicted ..." entries (transition: reconcile legacy to pending)
+# \b anchors the alternation so 'pending_review' / 'predicted_outcome' (non-canonical) still surface as legacy, not swept as pending
+grep -nA22 -E 'validation_status: *"?(predicted|pending)\b' tracks/_meta/edit_manifest.yaml
 ```
 
-Skip entries where `predicted_measurable_by` date has not yet passed.
+Skip entries where `predicted_measurable_by` date has not yet passed. **Reconcile any legacy
+freeform `validation_status: "predicted — ..."` entry to `pending` (move the prose into
+`predicted_measurable_by`) as you touch it — otherwise it stays invisible to future passes.**
+**Reconciliation completeness** (a half-reconciled entry stays unverifiable): when you touch a legacy
+entry, also backfill the fields a canonical entry needs — generate a missing `id`
+(`em-{date}-{slug}`), set `file:` from the edit's target, and set `validation_type` explicitly (default
+**mechanical** when `predicted_measurable_by` names a grep/count/git check; **judged** when it names a
+reviewer observation). A missing `validation_type` is not a silent default — name it, or the entry
+can't be scored consistently across passes.
 
 **Step V2 — Verify Each Entry**
 
-For each pending entry, check the evidence source specified in `predicted_measurable_by`:
+First classify the entry by `validation_type`, then collect evidence accordingly:
+
+- **mechanical** — prediction is a count/presence checkable by grep/git. Record `baseline_value` →
+  `measured_value` → `delta`. The check IS the evidence (non-vacuous by construction).
+- **judged** — prediction needs reviewer judgment. Requires **one concrete cited observation**
+  (file:line / a quoted signal), never a bare "seems better". No citation → stays `pending`, not verified.
+  **Non-Model Ground (the citation must be tool-confirmed, not asserted)**: the cited file:line MUST be
+  confirmed by an actual Grep/Read **in this verify pass** and the tool output (the matched line) pasted
+  into `verification_note` — a citation-shaped string asserted from memory is NOT evidence. An
+  unverifiable / un-pasted citation caps `match_score` at **0.5** (never 1.0). This is the same anchor
+  discipline as phantom-quench: a verdict rests on a surfaced span, not a claim that one exists.
+- **untestable** — no observable evidence source. Mark `untestable`, do not score.
+
+For each entry, check the evidence source specified in `predicted_measurable_by`:
 
 | Evidence Source | Check Method |
 |---|---|
@@ -121,6 +159,9 @@ For each pending entry, check the evidence source specified in `predicted_measur
 | User friction signals | Grep `tracks/_meta/fh_signal_*.md` for related friction |
 | Git commit frequency | `git log --oneline --since={date} -- {file}` |
 
+Then score `match_score`: **1.0** = evidence clearly confirms the prediction · **0.5** = partial/ambiguous
+· **0.0** = contradicted or no-occurrence. Record the score + the cited evidence in `verification_note`.
+
 > **Circularity guard**: edit-manifest is invoked *by* harvest-loop (Step 0-c). To avoid a
 > circular evidence loop, edit-manifest must NOT use harvest-loop's own synthesis outputs
 > (proposal lists, curator decisions) as verification evidence. Evidence sources are limited
@@ -129,12 +170,13 @@ For each pending entry, check the evidence source specified in `predicted_measur
 
 **Step V3 — Apply Validation Gate**
 
-| Outcome | Gate Decision | Next Action |
+| `match_score` | status → Gate Decision | Next Action |
 |---|---|---|
-| Evidence confirms prediction | `verified` → `accepted` | No action needed |
-| Evidence contradicts prediction | `falsified` → `rejected` | Add to rejected-edits buffer; propose revert if regression |
-| No evidence yet | Keep `pending` | Re-check next session |
-| Untestable | `untestable` | Flag for human judgment |
+| ≥ 0.75 | `verified` → `accepted` | No action needed |
+| 0.25–0.75 | `verified`(partial) → `redefine` | Sharpen the prediction/edit; note what partially held |
+| ≤ 0.25 | `falsified` → `rejected` | Add to rejected-edits buffer; propose revert if regression |
+| no evidence / window not matured | keep `pending` | Re-check next session |
+| no evidence source | `untestable` | Flag for human judgment |
 
 **Step V4 — Rejected-Edits Buffer Report**
 
@@ -195,13 +237,19 @@ RECORD mode:
   + Untestable flag applied if vague prediction
 
 VERIFY mode:
-  All pending entries checked
-  + Gate decisions applied (accepted / rejected / pending)
+  All pending entries checked (canonical + legacy freeform reconciled to pending)
+  + validation_type classified (mechanical / judged / untestable)
+  + match_score recorded with cited evidence (mechanical: delta; judged: one cited observation)
+  + Gate decisions applied (accepted / redefine / rejected / pending)
   + Rejected-edits buffer reported
   + Manifest file updated via Edit
   + Human gate presented for any proposed reverts
 ```
 
+**Check class** (per `harness_6axis_framework.md §Axis 5`): the verify pass itself is *measured* for
+mechanical entries (delta is a number) and *judged* for judged entries — the judged path is kept
+non-vacuous by the **mandatory cited observation** (no citation → stays pending, never auto-verified).
+
 ## References
 
 - Theoretical basis: AHE (arXiv:2604.25850) §4 change manifest + prediction falsifiability

package/plugins/fh-meta/skills/context-bridge-dispatch/SKILL_detail.md

@@ -1,144 +0,0 @@
----
-name: context-bridge-dispatch-detail
-description: Archived original body of the deprecated context-bridge-dispatch skill
-load: on-demand
----
-
-## §Archive
-
-# context-bridge-dispatch — Parallel Agent Context Bridge (archived)
-
-In agent dispatch, sub-agents can read files but do not have access to the live conversation context of the main session. This skill generates a session context card before dispatch and injects it into each agent prompt.
-
-## Triggers
-
-| Phrase pattern | Situation |
-|---|---|
-| "do it in parallel" / "agent view" + 2+ tasks | Auto-triggered |
-| "create a context bridge" | Explicit call |
-| `/context-bridge-dispatch` | Explicit call |
-| Immediately before dispatching 2+ agents | Auto-injected |
-
-## Context Card Format
-
-**N≤2 (standard)**:
-```
-[Session Context Card]
-Purpose: {the goal of this session / task}
-Completed: {what has already been decided or implemented — risk of duplication if agent doesn't know}
-This agent's task: {the specific task for this agent}
-Note: {constraints, directions, or history the agent must know before acting}
-```
-
-**N≥3 (Registry mode — DACS-inspired)**:
-```
-[Session Context Card]
-Purpose: {session goal}
-Completed: {done items + file paths}
-This agent's task: {specific task}
-Note: {constraints}
-
-[Agent Registry]
-Agent-1 ({role}): {≤1 sentence — what it's doing, key files}
-Agent-2 ({role}): {≤1 sentence}
-... (all agents except this one)
-```
-
-Registry entries keep other agents visible (≤200 tokens total) without flooding context.
-Each agent gets its own full card + compressed view of the parallel picture.
-
-## Step 1. Extract Session Context
-
-Summarize the 3 key items from the current conversation:
-- **Purpose**: Core goal of this session / request
-- **Completed**: What has already been built or decided (include file paths and commits)
-- **Note**: Constraints that could lead an agent in the wrong direction if unknown
-
-## Step 2. Identify Agent List + Generate Individual Cards
-
-For each of the N agents to dispatch:
-- Common Context Card (Step 1 summary)
-- Agent-specific item (`This agent's task` field customized per agent)
-
-**N≥3 — Registry mode**: additionally generate one Registry entry per agent:
-```
-Agent-X ({role}): {what it's doing in ≤1 sentence} | files: {key paths}
-```
-Each agent's card includes the Registry entries for all *other* agents (omit its own).
-Keep total Registry section ≤200 tokens. If an agent's task is simple (read-only lookup), its registry entry can be a single phrase.
-
-## Step 3. Execute Parallel Dispatch
-
-Prepend the Context Card to each agent's prompt and dispatch as a single message.
-
-```
-[Session Context Card]
-...
-
-{Agent's original task instruction}
-```
-
-## Focus Mode (on-demand, N≥3)
-
-When an agent's result is incomplete and it signals it needs another agent's full output:
-1. Orchestrator identifies the target agent (a_i) whose full context is needed
-2. Re-dispatch the requesting agent with: full Context Card of a_i + Registry-compressed entries for all others
-3. Use only when genuinely needed — adds one round-trip latency
-
-Trigger signal from agent: `"Need full context from Agent-X to proceed"` or equivalent explicit statement.
-
-## Coordination-Overhead Budget
-
-Centralized multi-agent coordination is not free: external reporting cites orchestrator-worker coordination adding ~+285% token overhead (see the digest Provenance), and coordination cost dominates once a wave exceeds ~4 agents. Apply the following before each dispatch wave.
-
-| Rule | Constraint |
-|---|---|
-| **Parallel fan-out cap** | 3–4 agents per dispatch wave. This is the upper bound for the 2+ parallel dispatch in the Simplification Guard — do not flat-fan-out past 4. |
-| **Capability-aware routing** | Route each subtask to the agent whose declared capability fits, reading `.claude/registry/agent_cards.json` as the routing source (`role` + `allowed_tools` + `writes`). Do not dispatch a `writes: false` audit agent (e.g. `fact-checker`, `hub-persona-auditor`) for a task needing edits. |
-| **Escalation** | If a task genuinely needs >4 parallel agents, decompose hierarchically (supervisor → sub-waves) rather than flat fan-out. |
-
-Source: `../../../../knowledge/shared/harness-core/harness_frontier_diagnosis_2026-06-02.md`
-
-## Step 4. Aggregate Results
-
-After all agents complete, consolidate results in the main session and report to the user.
-
-## Simplification Guard
-
-- Simple file lookup agents unrelated to context (e.g., "read file A") → card may be omitted
-- Single agent dispatch → card injection optional
-- 2+ parallel dispatch → card injection required
-
-## Why This Is Necessary
-
-Agents are spawned in an isolated environment (sub-agent sandbox). They can read what is recorded in files, but decisions made during the current main session conversation — direction changes, completed implementations, design intent — do not exist for the agent unless saved to a file.
-
-Problems this disconnection causes:
-- Attempting to redo already completed work
-- Working in the old direction without knowing the current session's direction change
-- Making wrong decisions without knowing the constraints
-
-Context Bridge corrects this asymmetry.
-
-## Done When
-
-```
-All steps 1–4 completed
-+ Context Card injected at the front of each agent prompt
-+ Results aggregated and reported after all agents complete
-```
-
-## Connected Skills
-
-| Situation | Connection |
-|---|---|
-| Context collapse risk after a long session | `/context-doctor` |
-| Task of promoting field patterns to FH | `/field-harvest` |
-| When agent orchestration itself is complex | `agent-composer` |
-| N≥3 agents / long-running orchestration (context drifts post-dispatch) | See sister asset: DACS (arXiv:2604.07911) — Registry+Focus dynamic isolation |
-
-## Design Basis
-
-Registry mode and Focus mode patterns absorbed from **DACS** (arXiv:2604.07911, Nickson Patel, 2026-04-09).
-DACS validated: steering accuracy 98.4% vs 21% baseline at N=10; context efficiency 3.53×.
-Cross-audit + import/propagate analysis: `tracks/_audit/session_2026-06-02_dacs-sister.md`