@christang/keel 5.65.0 → 5.66.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "keel",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "5.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "5.66.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Keel OpenSpec execution discipline: stateless continuity, task capsules, deterministic gates, and expectation alignment for Codex and Claude Code.",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "TanglmChris",
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "keel",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "5.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "5.66.0",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Keel OpenSpec execution discipline: stateless continuity, task capsules, deterministic gates, and expectation alignment for Codex and Claude Code.",
|
|
5
5
|
"author": {
|
|
6
6
|
"name": "TanglmChris",
|
|
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ REQUIRED_SCRIPTS = [
|
|
|
38
38
|
"scripts/validate_plugin.py",
|
|
39
39
|
]
|
|
40
40
|
|
|
41
|
-
PACKAGE_VERSION = "5.
|
|
42
|
-
PROTOCOL_VERSION = "5.
|
|
41
|
+
PACKAGE_VERSION = "5.66.0"
|
|
42
|
+
PROTOCOL_VERSION = "5.66.0"
|
|
43
43
|
LEGACY_MANAGED_START = "<!-- keel:start version=2.1 -->"
|
|
44
44
|
OPENSPEC_SCHEMA_NAME = "keel-spec-driven"
|
|
45
45
|
# Mirrors KEEL_PACKAGE_NAME in scripts/install_to_repo.py, one of the two
|
|
@@ -17027,6 +17027,42 @@ STANDING_AUTHORIZATION_ACTIONS = (
|
|
|
17027
17027
|
)
|
|
17028
17028
|
|
|
17029
17029
|
|
|
17030
|
+
def run_node_expression(root: Path, expression: str) -> str:
|
|
17031
|
+
"""Evaluate a Node expression with `root` as the working directory.
|
|
17032
|
+
|
|
17033
|
+
The declaration set is read from the module that defines it rather than by
|
|
17034
|
+
regexing its source: a regex over the source would be a second copy of the
|
|
17035
|
+
same literal the check exists to remove, one level down (issue #143).
|
|
17036
|
+
"""
|
|
17037
|
+
result = subprocess.run(
|
|
17038
|
+
["node", "-e", expression],
|
|
17039
|
+
cwd=root,
|
|
17040
|
+
text=True,
|
|
17041
|
+
encoding="utf-8",
|
|
17042
|
+
errors="replace",
|
|
17043
|
+
capture_output=True,
|
|
17044
|
+
check=False,
|
|
17045
|
+
)
|
|
17046
|
+
return result.stdout
|
|
17047
|
+
|
|
17048
|
+
|
|
17049
|
+
def config_header_problem(names: list, flat_header: str) -> str:
|
|
17050
|
+
"""The one rule for "the header names every declaration", or "" when it does.
|
|
17051
|
+
|
|
17052
|
+
Returns the diagnostic naming the missing declaration. Deliberately reports
|
|
17053
|
+
no count: a count tells an author that two numbers differ, and the name tells
|
|
17054
|
+
them which line to write.
|
|
17055
|
+
"""
|
|
17056
|
+
for name in names:
|
|
17057
|
+
if name not in flat_header:
|
|
17058
|
+
return (
|
|
17059
|
+
f"keel/config.yaml's header does not name the `{name}` "
|
|
17060
|
+
"declaration, so a project reading it would never learn it may "
|
|
17061
|
+
"write one. Add it to the header's list."
|
|
17062
|
+
)
|
|
17063
|
+
return ""
|
|
17064
|
+
|
|
17065
|
+
|
|
17030
17066
|
def write_authorize_config(repo: Path, body: str) -> None:
|
|
17031
17067
|
(repo / "keel").mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
|
|
17032
17068
|
(repo / "keel" / "config.yaml").write_text(body, encoding="utf-8")
|
|
@@ -18117,11 +18153,27 @@ def validate_delegation_resident_text_scenario() -> int:
|
|
|
18117
18153
|
# M1 — the config header counts its declarations correctly.
|
|
18118
18154
|
config = ROOT / "keel/config.yaml"
|
|
18119
18155
|
cfg = flat(config)
|
|
18120
|
-
|
|
18121
|
-
|
|
18156
|
+
# Derived from the module that reads the declarations, not restated here. The
|
|
18157
|
+
# literal this replaces had been hand-bumped twice, and the second bump was
|
|
18158
|
+
# found by a red suite run in a scenario named for something else (#143).
|
|
18159
|
+
declarations = [
|
|
18160
|
+
name
|
|
18161
|
+
for name in run_node_expression(
|
|
18162
|
+
ROOT,
|
|
18163
|
+
"process.stdout.write("
|
|
18164
|
+
"require('./src/core/config.js').CONFIG_DECLARATIONS.join(','))",
|
|
18165
|
+
).strip().split(",")
|
|
18166
|
+
if name
|
|
18167
|
+
]
|
|
18168
|
+
if not declarations:
|
|
18169
|
+
report(
|
|
18170
|
+
"delegation-resident-text: src/core/config.js exports no declaration "
|
|
18171
|
+
"list, so the header cannot be checked against what Keel reads."
|
|
18172
|
+
)
|
|
18122
18173
|
return 1
|
|
18123
|
-
|
|
18124
|
-
|
|
18174
|
+
header_problem = config_header_problem(declarations, cfg)
|
|
18175
|
+
if header_problem:
|
|
18176
|
+
report(f"delegation-resident-text: {header_problem}")
|
|
18125
18177
|
return 1
|
|
18126
18178
|
if "delegation" not in cfg:
|
|
18127
18179
|
report("delegation-resident-text: the config header does not document delegation.")
|
|
@@ -28591,6 +28643,104 @@ def validate_a_negation_is_not_a_marker_scenario() -> int:
|
|
|
28591
28643
|
return 0
|
|
28592
28644
|
|
|
28593
28645
|
|
|
28646
|
+
def validate_a_count_is_derived_from_what_it_counts_scenario() -> int:
|
|
28647
|
+
"""Issue #143: the header assertion restated a set as an English numeral.
|
|
28648
|
+
|
|
28649
|
+
It had been hand-bumped twice, and the second bump was discovered by a red
|
|
28650
|
+
suite run in a scenario whose name has nothing to do with what was changed.
|
|
28651
|
+
An assertion about a set belongs to the set: read it from the module that
|
|
28652
|
+
defines it, and name the member that is missing rather than a count.
|
|
28653
|
+
"""
|
|
28654
|
+
label = "a-count-is-derived-from-what-it-counts"
|
|
28655
|
+
|
|
28656
|
+
def declared_names(root: Path) -> list[str]:
|
|
28657
|
+
result = run_node_expression(
|
|
28658
|
+
root,
|
|
28659
|
+
"process.stdout.write("
|
|
28660
|
+
"require('./src/core/config.js').CONFIG_DECLARATIONS.join(','))",
|
|
28661
|
+
)
|
|
28662
|
+
return [name for name in result.strip().split(",") if name]
|
|
28663
|
+
|
|
28664
|
+
names = declared_names(ROOT)
|
|
28665
|
+
if not names:
|
|
28666
|
+
report(
|
|
28667
|
+
f"{label}: the assertion is a literal — `src/core/config.js` exports "
|
|
28668
|
+
"no declaration list, so nothing the header is checked against comes "
|
|
28669
|
+
"from the code that reads it."
|
|
28670
|
+
)
|
|
28671
|
+
return 1
|
|
28672
|
+
for expected in (
|
|
28673
|
+
"fast_check",
|
|
28674
|
+
"authorize",
|
|
28675
|
+
"precedents",
|
|
28676
|
+
"triage",
|
|
28677
|
+
"delegation",
|
|
28678
|
+
"full_mode_paths",
|
|
28679
|
+
):
|
|
28680
|
+
if expected not in names:
|
|
28681
|
+
report(
|
|
28682
|
+
f"{label}: the exported declaration list omits {expected!r}, so "
|
|
28683
|
+
f"the header is not checked for it; got {names!r}."
|
|
28684
|
+
)
|
|
28685
|
+
return 1
|
|
28686
|
+
|
|
28687
|
+
header = (ROOT / "keel/config.yaml").read_text(encoding="utf-8")
|
|
28688
|
+
flat_header = re.sub(r"\s+", " ", header)
|
|
28689
|
+
for name in names:
|
|
28690
|
+
if name not in flat_header:
|
|
28691
|
+
report(
|
|
28692
|
+
f"{label}: keel/config.yaml's header does not name {name!r}, "
|
|
28693
|
+
"which is the declaration a new project would never learn it may "
|
|
28694
|
+
"write."
|
|
28695
|
+
)
|
|
28696
|
+
return 1
|
|
28697
|
+
|
|
28698
|
+
# The derivation is proved by feeding the check a member the header cannot
|
|
28699
|
+
# contain. Without this the whole scenario is satisfied by a list that
|
|
28700
|
+
# happens to agree with a header nobody compared it to.
|
|
28701
|
+
missing = config_header_problem(names + ["invented_declaration"], flat_header)
|
|
28702
|
+
if not missing:
|
|
28703
|
+
report(
|
|
28704
|
+
f"{label}: the assertion is a literal — a declaration absent from "
|
|
28705
|
+
"the header produced no failure, so the check is not reading the "
|
|
28706
|
+
"exported list."
|
|
28707
|
+
)
|
|
28708
|
+
return 1
|
|
28709
|
+
if "invented_declaration" not in missing:
|
|
28710
|
+
report(
|
|
28711
|
+
f"{label}: the failure does not name the missing declaration; got "
|
|
28712
|
+
f"{missing!r}."
|
|
28713
|
+
)
|
|
28714
|
+
return 1
|
|
28715
|
+
if re.search(r"\b(?:four|five|six|seven)\b", missing, re.IGNORECASE):
|
|
28716
|
+
report(
|
|
28717
|
+
f"{label}: still says six declarations — the failure reports a "
|
|
28718
|
+
f"count rather than the missing name; got {missing!r}."
|
|
28719
|
+
)
|
|
28720
|
+
return 1
|
|
28721
|
+
|
|
28722
|
+
# A header naming every declaration while miscounting them in prose passes:
|
|
28723
|
+
# membership is the checkable property, and a count is a lossy restatement.
|
|
28724
|
+
miscounted = flat_header.replace(
|
|
28725
|
+
"Six independent declarations", "Five independent declarations"
|
|
28726
|
+
)
|
|
28727
|
+
if miscounted == flat_header:
|
|
28728
|
+
report(f"{label}: the header's prose count could not be located to vary it.")
|
|
28729
|
+
return 1
|
|
28730
|
+
if config_header_problem(names, miscounted):
|
|
28731
|
+
report(
|
|
28732
|
+
f"{label}: still says six declarations — a header naming all of them "
|
|
28733
|
+
"while miscounting them in prose was refused."
|
|
28734
|
+
)
|
|
28735
|
+
return 1
|
|
28736
|
+
|
|
28737
|
+
if label not in {name for name, _ in SCENARIOS}:
|
|
28738
|
+
report(f"{label}: the scenario registry does not include it.")
|
|
28739
|
+
return 1
|
|
28740
|
+
report(f"{label} scenario passed.")
|
|
28741
|
+
return 0
|
|
28742
|
+
|
|
28743
|
+
|
|
28594
28744
|
SCENARIOS: tuple = (
|
|
28595
28745
|
("stateless-continuity", validate_stateless_continuity_scenario),
|
|
28596
28746
|
("core-gates", validate_core_gates_scenario),
|
|
@@ -28953,6 +29103,10 @@ SCENARIOS: tuple = (
|
|
|
28953
29103
|
"a-negation-is-not-a-marker",
|
|
28954
29104
|
validate_a_negation_is_not_a_marker_scenario,
|
|
28955
29105
|
),
|
|
29106
|
+
(
|
|
29107
|
+
"a-count-is-derived-from-what-it-counts",
|
|
29108
|
+
validate_a_count_is_derived_from_what_it_counts_scenario,
|
|
29109
|
+
),
|
|
28956
29110
|
)
|
|
28957
29111
|
|
|
28958
29112
|
|
package/src/core/config.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -68,6 +68,21 @@ function classifyAuthorizationEntry(entry) {
|
|
|
68
68
|
// and the declaration must still be correct after both.
|
|
69
69
|
const DELEGATION_TIERS = ["routine", "standard", "deep"];
|
|
70
70
|
|
|
71
|
+
// Every declaration this module reads, in the order the file documents them. One
|
|
72
|
+
// list, so an assertion about the set can be derived from the set instead of
|
|
73
|
+
// restating it: the header check used to pin an English numeral and had been
|
|
74
|
+
// hand-bumped twice, each time discovered by a red suite run in a scenario named
|
|
75
|
+
// for something else (issue #143). Adding a declaration now costs a header line
|
|
76
|
+
// and an entry here, and nothing has to agree about a number.
|
|
77
|
+
const CONFIG_DECLARATIONS = [
|
|
78
|
+
"fast_check",
|
|
79
|
+
"authorize",
|
|
80
|
+
"precedents",
|
|
81
|
+
"triage",
|
|
82
|
+
"delegation",
|
|
83
|
+
"full_mode_paths",
|
|
84
|
+
];
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
71
86
|
const CONFIG_RELATIVE_PATH = path.join("keel", "config.yaml");
|
|
72
87
|
|
|
73
88
|
// The declarations share keel/config.yaml with fast_check, so the reader stays
|
|
@@ -533,6 +548,7 @@ function triageIssue(repo, labels, issue = null) {
|
|
|
533
548
|
module.exports = {
|
|
534
549
|
CONFIG_RELATIVE_PATH,
|
|
535
550
|
DELEGATION_TIERS,
|
|
551
|
+
CONFIG_DECLARATIONS,
|
|
536
552
|
STANDING_AUTHORIZATION_ACTIONS,
|
|
537
553
|
SCOPED_AUTHORIZATION_ACTIONS,
|
|
538
554
|
readFullModePaths,
|