@chrisdudek/yg 0.3.1 → 0.3.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -168,8 +168,8 @@ However, you must NOT dump all knowledge into a single file. Yggdrasil's context
168
168
  ### CRITICAL RULE: CAPTURE INTENT, BUT NEVER INVENT IT
169
169
  The graph is not just a structural map; it is the semantic meaning of the system. Code explains "what" and "how". The graph MUST explain "WHY".
170
170
 
171
- 1. **ALWAYS Capture the User's "Why":** If the user explains the business reason, intent, or rationale behind a request (e.g., "We need to do X because Y"), you MUST permanently record this reasoning in the relevant graph artifacts (e.g., \`responsibility.md\`, \`constraints.md\`, \`decisions.md\`). Do not let the conversation context evaporate.
172
- 2. **NEVER Invent the "Why":** Files that imply human judgment (like \`decisions.md\` or \`knowledge/invariants\`) must reflect ACTUAL human choices.
171
+ 1. **ALWAYS Capture the User's "Why":** If the user explains the business reason, intent, or rationale behind a request (e.g., "We need to do X because Y"), you MUST permanently record this reasoning in the relevant graph artifacts (from \`config.artifacts\` that fit the content). Do not let the conversation context evaporate.
172
+ 2. **NEVER Invent the "Why":** Artifacts that imply human judgment (e.g. local decisions, \`knowledge/invariants\`) must reflect ACTUAL human choices.
173
173
  3. **NO Hallucinations:** You MUST NEVER infer or hallucinate a rationale, an architectural decision, or a business rule.
174
174
  4. **Ask if Missing:** If the user requests a significant architectural or business logic change but does not provide the rationale, you MUST ask them "Why are we making this change?" before documenting the decision in the graph.
175
175
 
@@ -178,10 +178,19 @@ When mapping a file, execute this mental routing:
178
178
  ### Layer 1: Unit Identity (Local Node Artifacts)
179
179
  * **What goes here:** Things exclusively true for this specific node.
180
180
  * **Routing:** **DO NOT ASSUME FILE NAMES.** You MUST read \`.yggdrasil/config.yaml\` (the \`artifacts\` section) to see the exact allowed filenames for the current project and their requirement conditions (e.g., \`required: always\` vs \`when: has_incoming_relations\`). Write local node knowledge ONLY into these configured files next to \`node.yaml\`.
181
- * **logic.md:** Algorithmic flow, control flow, branching logic, decision trees the "how" of execution. Create when the node has non-trivial logic that cannot be inferred from interface alone. Extract from source; do not invent.
182
- * **model.md:** Data structures, schemas, entities, type definitions — the shape of data this node owns. Create when the node manages non-trivial data structures. Extract from source types/interfaces; do not invent fields.
181
+ * For each artifact in \`config.artifacts\`, use its \`description\` to decide what content belongs there. Create optional artifacts (those with \`required: never\`) when the node has matching content. Extract from source; do not invent.
183
182
 
184
- **Subagents:** When mapping a node (reverse engineering or graph-first), if the source code contains non-trivial logic (branching, control flow, algorithms, workflows), create \`logic.md\` for that node. Document: control flow, branching conditions, decision trees, sequencing. Follow Layer 1 routing. Do not invent — extract only what is implemented.
183
+ **Subagents:** When mapping a node, for each optional artifact in config, ask: "Does the source contain content matching this artifact's description?" If yes, create it. Do not invent — extract only what is implemented.
184
+
185
+ ### Optional Artifacts — Explicit Consideration
186
+
187
+ When creating or editing a graph node, or mapping source files to a node, after fulfilling required artifacts, read \`config.yaml\` and for each artifact with \`required: never\`, ask: "Does this node contain content that matches this artifact's description?" If yes, create it. Base decisions on source code analysis, not file names or structure.
188
+
189
+ **Interpretation of \`required: never\`:** The artifact is optional for validation, not forbidden. Create it when the node has content that fits its description in config.
190
+
191
+ **Interpretation of "don't be over-eager":** Do not invent content, do not document what is not in the code, do not create empty or trivial artifacts. It does NOT mean: avoid adding optional artifacts when they add value based on code analysis.
192
+
193
+ **Post-node checklist:** After completing work on a node, for each optional artifact (from \`config.artifacts\` where \`required: never\`), check: does this node have content for it? If yes, create it. If uncertain, propose with brief justification rather than silently skipping.
185
194
 
186
195
  ### Layer 2: Surroundings (Relations & Flows)
187
196
  * **What goes here:** How this node interacts with others. You must not duplicate external interfaces locally.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "@chrisdudek/yg",
3
- "version": "0.3.1",
3
+ "version": "0.3.2",
4
4
  "description": "Make your repository self-aware. Persistent semantic memory and deterministic context assembly for AI agents.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "bin": {